Yale Law Professor Explains The Rise Of Political Tribalism | CNBC
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 вер 2024
- Amy Chua, Yale Law School professor, discusses how the U.S. political discussion has segregated the electorate into political tribes.
» Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/Subscrib...
About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
Connect with CNBC News Online
Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
Find CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Twitter: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Google+: cnb.cx/PlusCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/Instagra...
Yale Law Professor Explains The Rise Of Political Tribalism | CNBC
The Internet makes it so easy to find people with similar thoughts that people don't even try having conversations with those that are different.
True people be so stuck with their biases and can’t have a level headed fair forum
Actually kinda fair for CNBC. I’m a little surprised and impressed
Shepherd Smith works there now.
The dude gets triggered at 2:42. It kind of proves her point.
flaterikify by making a correct statement?
I was talking about how he gets all butt-hurt when she points out some shortcomings of his own tribe. Both sides also engage in identity mongering and victim worshiping, but he doesn't cry about that because the used those terms to describe those nasty people that he doesn't identify with.
and you proved a point t0o. i hate the over used term "triggered". how come he cant express his issue without being accused of being "triggered"?
Carlos Trevino Are you triggered?
“HAha lIbtarD trRiggErEd. I use the word trigger, I’m so superior” stfu.
Tribalism arises under stress, it's hardwired and can't be fixed. Have a war, reduce the stress :(
The problem: Tribalism is often abused by the deficiently conjured thoughts and actions of narcissists.
Thank
Takes one to know one lol
Along with eckhart, this woman is fronting the new conscious movement.
This feels like the North vs. South again. What's going on we have grown and are better than this?
Urban vs Rural vs Suburban (Moderate Swing)
No, we have not grown out of it. We will never grow out of it sadly.
“Is it the 2008 financial crisis.....”. HUH ??????
An American yes interesting question. That probably did contribute to tribalism a little since so many people got screwed and they stuck to their ideological guns more
Travis Jones except the rich and political elite. THAT tribe always survives. They are bipartisan about that.
Political Tribes, group instinct, and the Fate of Nations… Amy Chua.
An objective look at American politics today, published in 2018… Panned by the Guardian as “a well-intentioned book that never quite comes together”. As well as a less than a glowing review from
The Financial Times which acknowledges the “Tribalism” mentality, however, a “crucial question” was left unanswered.
To the first criticism, Amy missed the Pivot that occurred on August 23, 1971, when future Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell sold out the American people to a friend and confidant Eugene B. Sydnor. On that day America took on the traits of a classic Fascist government. America lost its integrity on that date. So, while most Americans believed America was exercising Thomas Jefferson’s Democratic Republic, it was exercising the traits of a Libertarian Government, waiting for someone to lead them.
Enter the Federalist Party, people who believe in the teachings of Alexander Hamilton, under the guise of James Madison (funny what a logo can do).
Federalists believe in the power of the Executive branch, however, not all Federalists are created equal.
Some Federalists, ALSO represent people who believe they are better than the common man, and therefore they should reap the benefits the system provides. Completely unAmerican, so they have to fool Americans by doing it in front of their very eyes.
This is the purpose of controlling Wall Street Banks and the Federal Reserve. Wall Street banks are leverage banks and the Federal Reserve creates the currency for our Status Quo to survive.
This is where America is today, being carved up by the special interests who control our Markets.
The Financial Times' “critical question” can best be described by historian George Tichnor Curtis. Who in 1854 and 1861 published the Financial Times' answer to the "critical question" in his books, History of the Origin, Formation, and Adoption of the Constitution of the United States.
This quote is borrowed from Benson Lossing books Our Country, attributed to the said author: At that time the world had witnessed no such spectacle as that of the deputies of a nation, chosen by the free action of great communities, and assembled for the purpose of thoroughly reforming its Constitution, by the exercise and with the authority of the National Will...Neither among the Greeks nor the Romans was there a precedent and scarce an analogy.
This is why America is special, THERE IS NO OTHER COUNTRY with America’s past.
Thomas Jefferson's Republic allows for the PIVOT, unlike other forms of government. This allows Americans 20/20 hindsight which means "We, the People" can learn from our mistakes. While Republicans want a king, a dead-end government created on "Birthrights", the Republican solution.
wel the scots hated the english until james 1 then they just got together and hated catholics
For every few hundred tribalists who fight each other over money, power and prestige, one capitalist is going get a lot of money, power and prestige. That is my prediction.
Like Capital (forms of Money and Trade) never existed until America Created it...?
People who think this way are as shallow as a kiddie pool.
You’re just now feeling it?... I’m from a federally recognized tribe... so, if you feel your “tribe “ is more on the defensive to “attack” against “invading terrorists”, then, welcome to our world 😉✊🏼
I read this book a while ago is a very interesting, never read anything like it.
Wow that host Becky sounded so dismissal to Professor Chua like yeah yeah what does that mean. 🙄
Guy on the far right is being facetious throughout the interview. He represents the problem.
I freaking love clash of clans!
I can't give her credit. She only talked about the right while she identified herself as left. And next time she identified herself as right and talked about left. So She is just not sure if she can say the truth.
It's because of the natural tribalism per se. What would you expect?
Fox and CNN
My tribe is heterosexual white conservative male
today people be like: born as a white man I identify myself as a black Filipina lesbian woman.
I don't have a tribe
@@kilocesar ?
@@tommyanomaly6193 Smart tribal people lose their personal identity confirming to that group and never understanding themselves.
Saying "just sit down and talk" doesn't work when one party in the discussion is an ethno-nationalist.
Wanting ethnic cleansing isn't a "different opinion". It's openly advocating genocide.
Eoin O'Connor Maybe you're misinterpreting what they stand for? How about you just sit down and talk to someone with a different opinion to find out?
You're claiming the entire Republican Party is White Nationalist?
Eoin O'Connor who TF is doing that? This is why we can't have nice things:. Ppl like you constantly conflate opposing views as, literally, Nazis...which, although stupid, may be fine if you held ALL groups to the same ridiculous standard. But you don't. Groups like La Raza, BLM, Zionists, Feminists...you view those as OK under the guise of 'the other' or 'marginalised'....all the while holding a different standard to what you conceive as 'dominant' or 'oppressive'. Pull her head out.....
Eoin said "one party in the discussion is an ethno-nationalist", meaning the Republicans, I assume?
I literally have no idea what you're trying to say, T.
I don't like BLM or modern feminists? I'm assuming as you bring up Zionists you're not a fan of jews?
Honestly. Your comment isn't even coherent.
I'm confused. I never said that?
What side am I on, btw? I'm a British Conservative.
Mediagenic. Millsian debate is needed.
Yes she is, FOX News perhaps? And I thought that's the type of causation debate she was having, for the most part.
Explains so much of base...
She looks like an evil empress from a martial arts film.
Todd sperling What an insightful comment, Todd. Thank you for sharing.
Lol.
Yes Todd. You are stupid, we are not! Your jokes aren't funny, ours are. And what's with that martial art? That's not cool! Talk about star wars if you must... 😡
kkk true.
Yale Law School, what struggle exactly did you experience. This is the issue i find most alarming. People telling other people about a struggle they know nothing about.
As far as I know, the word nationalism has existed for over a hundred years. Nothing new here. Move on
It's what Hitler's movement thrived and relied on.
Holy cow, I would love to marry her. Educated and beautiful. Damn!
Jason Gafar gross
@@user-rr8io7gk1b how is that gross?
me too
"It's hardwired" isn't really an acceptable explanation, in my opinion.
It doesn’t need to be acceptable to you to be true. In fact you saying you need a more in-depth explanation sits you in a tribe of humans which have a problem with agreeing to things without hearing the full story. Now are you aware of that? Only if you are actively in a group of humans who speak on this topic openly. But if you aren’t aware of it in that way, then is is a subconscious and automatic part of your identity, and thus hardwired.
Distinguishing "hardwired" from learned social behavior isn't easy to do. I'm just saying I would like to hear more evidence before I am ready to accept that conclusion. Expert authority doesn't carry a lot of weight for me; hard evidence does. Skepticism (a strong BS filter) is my modus operandi, and has served me well in life.
I can completely agree with you, and normally i’d be the same way, but something about this lady just really feels, in my heart, like she’s trying to do something good. The look in her eyes, her body movements, the way she comes back at the hosts politely, yet firmly, the way she’s hardcore exposing sports for the tribal fantasies that they are.
She seems genuine, but more data is definitely needed to come to a final conclusion.
@@Sound8VisionVibe I think you are confusing “a group of people” with just a “set of people”-ie. for whom just a qualification of some sort has been presented, without any sketch of affiliations b/n them. for example, “the set of extraordinary people” is not a group in the sense of this discussion, almost by definition.
@{Jess Stuart} : a surprising deficit in this discussion seems to be the almost total disregard for the “software” (although the discussion itself is an instance of it) as a, possibly much stronger, driving force for humanity. The effect of reasoning by the agents, above their genetics and memetics, is horrendously harder to model scientifically-and one seems to have chosen to do the easy science instead.. of searching under the lamppost.
@@namusmotorola8075 Your splitting hairs. This does not rely on someone needlessly acknowledging a semi-illusory difference between two words that, in this context, can be used interchangably to make ones point without any confusion whatsoever. All that brought to the table was a toss of the good ol’ seeds of confusion.
I can speak to a “Group” of extraordinary people, I can speak to a set of extraordinary people, and the whole time, they were the exact same people, definition be damned. The people do not have to be consciously together in something to be seen as a group by an outside eye, the difference lies only in the importance of the group to bee rigidly referred to as a group, and not a “set”, or a “flock”, etc.