CJI vs SG, CJI: How Can You Not Standy by Parliament ?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 лют 2024
- CJI vs SG, CJI: How Can You Not Standy by Parliament ? #supremecourt #lawchakra #legal
Visit Our Website:- lawchakra.in/
Patna High Court Karnataka High Court Live Stream.
#Patnahighcourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Supremecourt
Courtesy :- Supreme Court of India
Books on Constitution:- amzn.to/3rqFpbh
Tools Used for editing:- amzn.to/3EelR1r
For business Enquiries:- enquire@lawchakra.in
#SupremeCourt#Mussorrie #advocate #lawyer #legal #livehighcourt #indianlaw #law #live #court #argument #criminaljustice #guiltyminds #learnadvocacy #courtlive #justicelive #lawmotivation #beajudge #ias #judge #law #legal #patnahighcourt #justiceashutoshkumar #judiciary #motivation #learnlaw #IAS #supremecourtofindia #IPS #2022 #Patnahighcourtstream #orissahighcourt #SupremeCourt #Orissahighcourt#GujaratHighCourt
#Law #Chakra#JusticeAshutoshkumar
*This Video is strictly for Legal Awareness & Education Purpose only.📚
🙏 Follow us on twitter, Instagram and facebook.
@Lawchakra
👉Twitter
/ lawchakra
👉 Instagram.
/ lawchakras
📑*Fair Use Policy -*
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
All amendments made during emergency should be revisited and expunged if not needed or detrimental.
Exactly. To be true every law passed could be reviewed, amended, fresh law could be passed and even withdrawn. Parliament has power to do.
The parliament need to do that
@@sudhirchandra9790 Yes. There is no time now. Modi do if he comes back to power with enough majority. That's why he is not taking any risk. He even welcoming all who abused him. RSS, BJP aim is bigger one not taking revenge like other parties. Dangerous Islamists( not general Muslims, conversion mafia ( not ordinary Christians should bet and LeLis to be sterilised . Khan Mary (Sonia) anti Hindu party should be forced to bite dust. Modi is no Vajpayee. Carrot and stick policy will be ensured. Of course all Hindus should vote him otherwise it's not possible. Ayodhya about temple only? Uniting Hindus, make them vote united like Muslims and Christians.
Clappings 👏👏
The same SC sat on Farm Laws passed by Parliament. The same SC said I don't see 85% of the farmers who are supporting these farm laws on roads.
Correct. Height of hypocrisy displayed by Milords!! 🙄🙄🙄
Yeah thr government said the same.
Supreme Court can do that not govt employee 😐
@@subbaraotanguturu9271 get help!
Least accountable
Least responsible.
How can a law officer of the executive branch of the government say I don't stand by the law of the land made by the legislature?
Becouse current law officer doesn't have the responsibility towards the laws passed under other law officer of some bygone government. Law officer of government is a law officer, not advocate for the government that he has to speak only "FOR" his client.
@@insearchof9090 the executive is bound by the laws made by the legislature until the concerned law has been amended. Why has the government not amended the said law?
@@tamoghnapramanick2735 becouse your are slow. This issue has been put into the court with a PIL against government's advances to be made on the law. Now, until it's merit isn't decided by court, legislature can't touch the old law, which exactly Tushar Mehta said to CJI and CJI didn't followup knowing the validity of claim. He went on convention that "law officer has to be in approval of government, always, as he represents government, which is the basis of his hired position".
Did u understand what I just said? Becouse i doubt it given your ability to understand the content already given in video.
Have you ever seen a law made by any gov, which has gone into PIL and while it is in the courts, government changed it and now fighting the PIL on the changed laws. Courts would stop the legislature.
Don't know? All could be amended, fresh law could be passed and even repeal the law passed by parliament by parliament itself.
@@subbaraotanguturu9271 not when it is subjudice. For some cases, this is hard and fast rule. You are witnessing such one case as above.
When I see these arguments it makes me feel proud that justice reigns supreme in my country.
fooling yourself, these sold out judges are selling out the country to george soros, cia & china
As per MiLords, What happened to the supreme status of Parliament in the case of NJAC ?
You have not understood. In any ACT passed by the parliament it is only the judiciary who can refuse to agree, after due process of trial and arguments. A representative of the Govt cannot but abide by the law when judiciary has not pronounced any judgment against that particular law.
Fool parliament cannot change the basic structure of the constitution. Independence of judiciary is paramount in a democracy
Exactly. Hypocrites to the core.
@@sasthamaniiyer9718The same Parliament reviewed the status and the passed fresh bill by authority given to parliament. It is within it's right to amend,pass fresh bill and withdraw as well.
Well said jury should thank their stars that SG did not quote that example
Laws made in the past should be revisited and made ammendments according to the present societal needs
Beautiful comment ❤
Like UAPA
But under supervision of SC and LOA.
The Judiciary is educated and follows the Constitution unlike the local elected representative who mostly is a slumlord or earning from dubious means laundered thru political means
😢😢😢😮nowadays atrocious of lawyers and judges increased enormously blackmailing for money we need unbiased judicial systems unbiased police systems 🎉4r
I don't understand how the same SC accepted and heard Article 370 if parliament is supreme they should not have accepted the case into court. If there is an issue with the law where the people will go. SC can't change the amendment but they can suggest what could be done.
I think You're reading wrong books😂
@@AbhiiiYadavvvv it is you are not at all reading any book i will buy it for you kid. :)
Art 245 will make it clear that the Constitution, not the Parliament, is supreme. Art 13(2) and Art 37 will nail any further doubts. Art 370 was written when J& K had not become a part of India. It had acceded to India in 1947 through the Instrument of Accession, which was an international treaty, granting specific powers to India, and Art 7 of the treaty provided that no provision of any future Constitution of India would be applicable without specific acceptance. The Constitution of India was then in the making only. It was in 1956 that the Constituent Assembly of J&K, though the un-amendable S. 3 of its Constitution, made all provisions of the Constitution of India and all laws passed by Parliament pursuant thereto applicable and enforceable proprio vigore in J& K. Integration with India became complete in 1956.
Parliament is not last truth.
Excellent argument by the SG
CJI SIR ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
जब शर्म की बात गर्व की बात बन जाए,
तब समझो कि जनतंत्र बढ़िया चल रहा है।
- हरिशंकर परसाई
Salute to CJI ❤
Parliament is supreme to make a law and SC is supreme to check the law whether it is under steel frame of constitution or not.
Once again the CJI upheld sovereignty of the Constitution..
That argument of CJI's 44th amendment दिल जीत लिया..
It is constitution is supreme & not parliament. Why SC needed if parliament is supreme? CJI telling in different context.
6@@Sahil-lover-gy6djtill when reservations should continue? 75 years is not enough?
If any sc/st/obc people working in government jobs or coming under tax bracket, what is the need of reservations?
@@sathyamjyanamanantham
This is never about need or economic conditions.
Don't you know ?
Reservation is based on CASTE.
This is against very concept of democracy. They r not elected but selected and they are very much corrupted not by small folks like you but global hegemone and deep state. The problem is their power now exceeds even the mps and cabinet minister which you folks voted out from yourself.
👍
Then why did they consume a lot of resources for article 370 for Kashmir 😂
Supreme sir .. your views are accurate and accepted
I think a Act or amendment by Parliament must be sent back to the sane to revise it, if the judiciary may feel so.
Congratulations cji
Super SG
Super glue of BJP
Well argued by SG, kudos to him
That we have sent during bond hearing gilli billi
Tushar Mehta should not assume CJI to be a RSS cadre like him
The CJI and his team ask probing and their assumptions as questions to SG but don’t do the same to opposition lawyers
btw, these people were not even letting SG say what he wanted to say
the same court sat and i believe is still on the case by bhusan regarding previous lok sabha election total votes in many constituencies not tallying with votes cast...
then what about CAA,NRC and farmer act ,new driver bill all were passed by parliament
Now we don't have Emergency or extended Parliament
Excellent SG .who is law officer???
when was this live streamed ? date?
SG says he doesnt stand by the law of the land.
He is so disrespectful & arogant he doesn't hv patience what so ever to llisten.
So arguing for the government or in individual capacity ? It is agreeable that if individually then he is correct in accepting or denying as one own will. He should have argued that on government Side it is so as enacted by parliament itself being done by elected minsiters. The question ask was whether government wouldn’t accept the enactment/amendment or whether you accept or denied. At this juncture, he should have replied in a way as stated above being representing the government/ parliament.
कभीं कभी ऐसा लगता है जो काम अंग्रेजो ने किया आज उसी को आज कोर्ट भी आगे बढ़ा रहे है और वो भी उन्हीं की भाषा में
Which case?
Amendment kis paristithi me kiya gaya hai yeh dekhna kyu jaruri nahi hai?
If Parliament is supreme as CJI says then why was NJAC struck down by Supreme Court?
Don't ask logical questions which goes against the narrative.
But SC is tester of law. That's why sc had trucked down the NJAc.
@@MulesloverDo you think self appointment of judges by the judges for the judges i.e collegium system is better than NJAC ??
How shameless these judges are ??
@@abhimanyusingh6761 remove collegium through parliment and then see how these judges are reacting to that !
@@abhimanyusingh6761 collegium is always better then NJAC. NJAC is brought by government to send their sanghi judge in supreme court higher positions
there are no Muslims in decision making in parliament there are no Muslim in lawyers who is arguing each other, there are no muslims in supreme court who he is hearing the debate, first make sizeable muslims part of process and then debate anything about so personal to muslims
Will cji explain Why 20% populated cult in India is getting Minor!ty benefits & jobs in Kerala and Kashmir States where they are in complete Majority?
.
Why is there No definition of "Min0rity" in our Constitution and even 20% populated group is considered as "Minority" compared to other relig0ns which are below 2% populated? Why 20% group is not treated as Second largest Majrity instead of Minrity? And consider that WAKF Board holds 3rd largest land in India after Defence and Raiways?
.
Why only 2002 Gujarat is talked about when there have been numerous other incidents (Naokhali, Moplah, Marichjhapi, Ajmer, Kashmiri Pandits, not to forget the Mughal Rule)?
.
Why STSJ and voicing Ola Uber 5 times a day over loudspeakers is considered okay as 'Freedom of Speech' but chanting JSR is considered as H@te Spech?
.
Why mocking and making fun of H religon in Bollywood, Comic Shows etc is considered as 'Freedom of Speech' but same thing on the Cult is not okay and considered as Izlm0phbia?
Is it the job of CJI to explainthese things
A nonsensical and hate filled typically "Andhbhakt" reply.
@@khadirkhan9681 He's right. If muslims get reservation in Hindu majority population states. Hindus should get reservation in muslim captured states.
Courts have their own hypocrisy
If Parliament is supreme then why did the supreme court strike down the NJC
Parliament is supreme 😂😂😂 NJAC laugh at corner 😂
Chapri comment "laugh at the corner"
@@hendy553😂
Brother judiciary is there to maintain checks on the arbitrariness of the legislature and executive you should study basic polity atleast if you are watching a video on a yt channel based on law
@@LuckySingh-po1rrsame parliament is there to keep check on MILORDS, they are doing everything else solving already pending cases
@@indiathatis2987 parliament has no right of authority over the judiciary
Parliament is Supreme unless... its in case of judiciary, eg NJAC.
CJi is contradicting himself
Why does not the CJI
Let the counsel talk?
Strange !!! Very strange. The court is supposed to listen to articles and not be the arguing counsel himself.
We are fed up with Judge Chandrachur. No other judge talks.
Very strange Supreme Court and has no dignity whatsoever.
Farm Law was passed in old Tea Shop of Modi cji knows that.. So he jumed up... 370 was redone by Vishwahindu parishad so he got urgent urge to discuss that..
Excellent argument by Tushar mehta
Jab tak collegium system rahega, aur bhai-bhateejavad ke chalte ghatiya judges select /appoint hote rahenge, tab tak SC mein aisee hi quality ke judges, and unke waise hi whimsical decisions aate rahenge. Parliament should impeach some judges and appoint better read learned judges
Fir get
His oath of office. But, how can the Court have taken political sides right from 1950> Schedule Three oath and S 166 IPC r/w S 44 IPC does not allow it.
missing bela trivedi to add balance to the bench
Ah Bela Trivedi the law secretary during the modi gujrat cabinet
How Ms population grows from 5 percent in 1947 to 20 percent in 2024 in India? But Hindu, Sikh, Chrtstan population reduces to single digit in Pakistan, Banglesh and Afghanistan? So where is persction evident on the basis of these facts?
.
How leading Ms Film Stars (Khans brigade, Dilip, Katrina etc), Music Directors (Anu Malik, A Rahman etc) Singers (Javed Ali, Rahat Khan, Atif, Noora), Cricketers (Pathan brothers, Azhar, Kaif, Shami) Businessmen (Wipro, Cipla etc) floursh and make wealth in India being cried as such an oppssd Country?
.
How the Ms Political breed (Abdullahs,Owaisis, Mehb00ba etc) and Jounos (Arfa, Rana, Saba, Sayma) who cryng oppresson regularly travel abroad in luxury flights and have their children studying in bestest of universities abroad?
Irrelevant statement to this case.
A very biased and hate filled communal reply. You must be an "Andhbhakt."
CJI exudes arrogance n prejudice towards Mehta... albeit very softly... but it is still arrogance
Why are Muslims only and not Convents etc. The genesis can be that India was Founded edu medium in UP.
The problem could also be that they build schools and you don't 😂
SG Tushar Mehta well argued against 7 Judges
Wonderful S G facing the confused and perhaps opiniated bench....
How one looks at the proceedings is also subject to which side of the political aisle one stands. Someone on the other side may call the SG belligerent, appearing to making an attempt to badger the courts.
BENCH SHOULD LISTEN
Always problematic all over the world
Lets have reservation in Supreme Court for the post of Judges.
Hope this confirms that the Judiciary will be stripped of its power if Modi is reelected. Some judges are resigning and joining the BJP/RSS.
Cji can not digest the fact don't tell him naked truth it's bitter
Will the SG accept a muslim teach Upanishad? It is a great tragedy that the CJ has to teach the SG what is his role.
solicitor general Hon'ble Sri Tushar ji Mehta, super super, salute to you. But I don't understand why the Hon'ble CJI decided to not to hear SG Hon'ble Sri TM ji. From whom the Hon'ble CJI wanted to hear
😂😂😂😂😂 acha tarika hai logo sacchai se dur rakhne ka zubaa hi badal do Jo aam admi ko samjh hi n aye😢😢
There is nothing like you can not amend the constitution. So many amendments were made. How SC stuck down NJAC and Farm laws? Can CJ explain this?
Did SC struck down farm laws😂😂😂
Mehta ji is booked for H#|| ...... few days n counting
Not stand by parliament? Doesn't he know amendments that take place, laws passed even withdrawn? Then? Wrong legislation which found now repealed. That's all. What about their not accepting NJAC bill passed by parliament, reviewing EC,CBI director appointment bills passed by parliament reviewed by it?
But Supreme court can't cancel/abolish the laws passed by the parliament!!
This powers only rest with parliament!!
That's why Parliament is supreme.
@@Worldofnaagins2995 Not answered how NJAC bill annulled by it?
SG is not representing the union of India and rather the ruling party.
sc speaks one and gives different judgement.
parliament is supreme !
Long live Judiciary
Its funny and ironic how people consider them so intelligent but unable to get what CJI is saying. Those mentioning farm laws or NJAC , please listen what SC is saying they are saying that the law officer if govt cant say they dint agree with parliament , sc can and will interprent things , thats rheir mandate but the govt themselves can't disagree with the constitution , if they do they must vring Constitutional ammendment (which SC can review too if needed ).
I salute toTushar Mehta SG who is facing 7 judges bravely.
Desh me shiv sach aahe ❤️🕉️ esliye shiv aase hi mili bhagat rahegi rishwat or bhrashtachar ki vajah se ❤️ shiv sach aam Aadmi or Kisan koi bhi kuch nahi kar sakta na aap logo ko dekh kar yese log raha hai ❤️🕉️
Independent judiciary means not dependent...on parliament too... some day parliament may dissolve democracy and install autocracy😂😂😂 so where people can go and ask😮
Ye kya logic h ki jo b emergency k samay me bill pass hue chahe wo unconstitutional hi kyu n ho unhe parliament hi rectify kre ki ye past me sahi ni hua to fir court ka meaning hi kya h.. Ese to kl pariyament ye bol de ki ab kbi election ni hoge yhi govt continue kregi to court usme kya kregi ki ye decision parliament hi sahi kre..
cji 😅😅😅 wow ..he says parliament is supreme ...SC overturn judiciary reforms, hears cases against caa, 370 abrogration by parliament etc...laughable hypocrisy by chandru
Parliment have to be supreme in democracy... In india judicial activism is high..
Incompatible lawyer or solicitor
What is this case discussion about?
Should AMU be given national madarsa status or not.
@@insearchof9090 It is already a Madarsa. Govt should just not fund it. I can't believe I once thought of studying there for my Engineering.
@@aditygrover 😂
@@insearchof9090What about BHU national castism temple
Mr Tushar mehata may become CJ also
SG words does not sound democratic at all...
A Load of bullshit not respecting Parliament 🙄
Law offucer with sisil.modi criminal arguing fir a criminal govt
Parliament jo bolega
Wo cji karega
Talking about somnath snd sesham are you not allieed to kerp some idiots as election commission
Law chakra ko bahut bahut dhanyavad ji lekin Desh bachao evm hatao 🎉🙏🇮🇳
Chandigarh me phir kyo ro rhe ho?😂
#saynotoballotvoting
@@rudr_nlyes 😂
EVM bhi nahi chahiye ballot bhi nahi chahiye toh kya sidhe sidhe virodhio ko he election winner declare karde? 🤬🤯
In EVM case some people may not be aware that before Congress introduced these,there used to be Honda raj to forcibly force bulk voting by not allowing genuine voters to vote.Therefore EVM is most safe voting system
CJI kaise pressure kar sakta hai kisi bhi party ko amendment accept karne ko?🤔
Bhai kya boo rahe ho toda soch lo bolne se phle 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🥲
Before Thsy decide the case let bench decide who and what makes a minority.. 20% is minority 😅😅
Law does not need not be Muslim. Why bench is not accepting. Thst amme dment 55 has sucessed the old processing
Tushar is illogical. He doesn't accept Law paees by Parliament of India and is hiding behind a HC judgement to claim it's in limbo rather than have the Parliament pass another law overruling that amendment, AND, of course, pay the political cist for it. His comparison to laws passed in Emergency are misleading and purile.
How are the arguments of SG misleading? Eat some almonds before opening your mouth
@@prakharrathi1427 Because he says he doesn't accept a law passed by Parliament. That's why. Please hear what he says and what the SC Judge warns him to be very careful about before opening his mouth. Hope you can comprehend spoken English.
@@sukhparhar CJI is congress stooge.
You didn't understand the whole video 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@Anonymous_self Ohh, ok
This is very scary. Back answering judges and raising voice that too in SC !!!! What kind of profession conduct is this 😢
When judge does not allow the SG to speak (they do it routinely) one has to raise the voice to be heard.This is a hearing of the case and not hearing of the CJI's voice
@@srinivasaiyer22 SC is not the place to react like this. Judge cannot be forced to listen unnecessary things
One Law one nation one flag. New India 🇮🇳 vision. Namaste 🙏
Our nation is already one. Our constitution is already one. Our national flag is already one. What are you even smoking? Also our unity in diversity is our strength because it represents the freedom. If you take that out then it's just a fascist country.
Rinbing indua from no where
SUPREME CIRCUS
Sharia court
When one Nation one flag,why can't institution one for all understand so called democratic country
Are all SC hearings related to muslims?
Hus nasres vouce has got a dog
This sg Tushar Mehta is unfit to be law officer. He does not know basic law. And this bench is impotent to not check such conduct
Tushar Mehta is incompetent always singing song of BJP.
SG’s arguments are not balanced because he has lost his balance. It is preposterous to think that a law officer can speak against his own party., viz., the govt. it is beyond the brief given to him. CJ pulled him up rightly.
sumpreme Kotha is proving it again !
When it was farmer laws, when it was 370 and be it demonetization , vaccines and many more why this kotha accept them at all for hearing since those were passed by parliament already still this chandu bai wants to poke his nose in that ? and now here he want us to follow a law created some 150 years ago ? what a hypocritic judge he is ! kick him out he does not deserve to be a SC judge ! remove collegium through parliment and then see how these judges will react !