Ex IAS Ne Bataya Electoral Bonds Ka Poora Sach | Jist

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 лют 2024
  • In a recent Jist interview, the former finance secretary Subhash Chandra Garg discussed the Indian government's thoughts on Electoral bonds and the controversies surrounding it.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 162

  • @uditpatwardhan
    @uditpatwardhan 4 місяці тому +48

    Instead of holding poltical parties accountable and prevent corruption, this man seems more proud that corruption is now legalised and is through formal banking channels.

    • @pany167
      @pany167 4 місяці тому +2

      Dont live in idealism.... Live in practicality.
      Corruption existed.... is existing and will exist.
      Tell me 1 political party in whole india which does not indulge in corruption ??

    • @Saif_Ali_Khan_1301
      @Saif_Ali_Khan_1301 4 місяці тому +4

      ​@@pany167 corruption as illegal entity,
      Bjp made it legal through electoral bonds

    • @offred6013
      @offred6013 4 місяці тому +5

      ​​@@pany167😂😂😂. Rape existed, exists, will exist .
      Become pragmatic nd stop making laws to prevent rape .
      😂😂😂

    • @SatymevaJayate007
      @SatymevaJayate007 4 місяці тому +3

      Legalizing illegal matters by Govt. is very dangerous for citizens.

    • @rohanmondal9970
      @rohanmondal9970 4 місяці тому

      He even said protection chahiye

  • @theVegabobond
    @theVegabobond 4 місяці тому +76

    Sir there are 2 primary points you didn't discuss.
    the main point here is right To information .A voter has every right to know the data of these so called donations .
    And the other point is that Only the ruling party can potentially check the electoral bond data and Opposition can't.

    • @doglover1511
      @doglover1511 4 місяці тому +3

      As if while giving cash to political parties u knew well

    • @Anonymous_384
      @Anonymous_384 4 місяці тому +5

      ⁠@@doglover1511yes, one could know

    • @ps-gh3hu
      @ps-gh3hu 4 місяці тому

      What you'll do with the knowledge?
      Information is available with everyone
      It's easy to guesstimate in case of electoral bonds we have companies data we have party data, is easy to guess, no brainer.
      Now SC has made it more shady & opaque.
      Cji just want to act smart, he don't want to understand the consequence.

    • @mh5616
      @mh5616 4 місяці тому

      ​@@ps-gh3hu you're an uneducated smartass.. you think you know the consequences you idiot.. you know shit

    • @Terahydron
      @Terahydron 4 місяці тому +3

      ​@@ps-gh3huit must be a right not guessing

  • @anitrai3515
    @anitrai3515 4 місяці тому +51

    He is quoting wrong percentage. In fact more than 90% fund collected through Electoral bonds received by BJP.

    • @renishjaviya6894
      @renishjaviya6894 4 місяці тому +2

      He is quoting overall number from 2018. 90 percent figure is only about in 2022- 2023.

    • @teqbasket9541
      @teqbasket9541 4 місяці тому +1

      Overall figure is 48.4% for BJP. Reported in Tribune newspaper today

    • @ps-gh3hu
      @ps-gh3hu 4 місяці тому +1

      Ha Bhai tujhe zaada pata hai 😂

    • @kedarnathpanda8724
      @kedarnathpanda8724 4 місяці тому +2

      So what , people see good governance by bjp so they volunteer to donate only to bjp. Any donations to congress would have misutilsed for Rahul benefit.
      If ruling party get most then the congress should win election but not to use cji for its benefit to promote cash transactions in election system.

    • @leisingh20011
      @leisingh20011 3 місяці тому

      Numbers change with the party

  • @letstalk458
    @letstalk458 4 місяці тому +15

    BJP uses this type of officers to run it's undemocratic machines smoothly.

  • @inderjeetsinghkunner8290
    @inderjeetsinghkunner8290 4 місяці тому +21

    This man is here for defending his ex bosses...

  • @anirudh_dh
    @anirudh_dh 4 місяці тому +14

    Let me ask simple questions
    1) How electoral bond stops from giving cash donations now?
    2) The limit which existed earlier that you can donate only 7.5% of average of last 3 yrs profit, why that limit was removed, doesn't that lead to creating shell companies and giving donations to political parties.
    3) Why did you allow foreign companies to donations for political parties
    4) Why do you want to keep secret name of doners?

    • @ps-gh3hu
      @ps-gh3hu 4 місяці тому

      There is reason buddy, perfect legit conditional reason, cji just messed it up

    • @anirudh_dh
      @anirudh_dh 4 місяці тому +2

      @@ps-gh3hu Tell us na what are the reasons, which problem it solved.

    • @uditpatwardhan
      @uditpatwardhan 4 місяці тому +2

      ​@@ps-gh3hu basically your argument is "trust me bro" 😂

    • @chetankaler5148
      @chetankaler5148 4 місяці тому

      @@ps-gh3hu andhbhakt lmao. why would a company going in loss do donations? can you think of any reason?

  • @publicvoice2360
    @publicvoice2360 4 місяці тому +12

    I do not understand why Income Tax is exempted while doing Party funding.....Income Tax is a Federal Revenue. So our political parties are using Citizens Money and Shareholders Money to fight elections? How is this constitutional?

    • @chetankaler5148
      @chetankaler5148 4 місяці тому

      " modi hai toh mumkin hai " india is no more a democratic country, it's being run by industrialists from a long time now

  • @ShubhamKumar-js8uv
    @ShubhamKumar-js8uv 4 місяці тому +11

    The RBI and EC has opposed it. The law ministry called ut unconstitutional in 2017. But obviously everyone let it go once because jiski laathi uski bhaish. The electoral bonds are past now stop justifying them.

  • @abhinavverma-2030
    @abhinavverma-2030 4 місяці тому +13

    Electoral bond = protection money 😅

    • @ps-gh3hu
      @ps-gh3hu 4 місяці тому

      No, without electoral bonds, now it's protection money, you didn't understand anything, re-watch

  • @ari_chakraborty
    @ari_chakraborty 4 місяці тому +4

    Your thumbnail is misleading

  • @prabhatk
    @prabhatk 4 місяці тому +4

    The real question is:
    Why do corporates donate to political parties? Once you know their motive, you will understand the quid pro quo. And that's why they don't want to put it on records. Most if these businesses are not doing charity by political donations.
    Ideally, every donation to political parties should go via banking system.

  • @prateekmodified
    @prateekmodified 4 місяці тому +6

    Ideally the constitutional body like EC should create a law and process to build a transparent solution for political funding

  • @sagaryadav-um1zq
    @sagaryadav-um1zq 4 місяці тому +4

    Thankyou for this video, now i know jist is also digital godi media, who just defend govt. even when they were proved blatantly weong

  • @mantrik007
    @mantrik007 4 місяці тому +2

    Transparency kaha thi electoral bonds mein? Shell companies ke jariye kala dhan se electoral bonds khareeda ja sakta tha.

  • @Super-verse
    @Super-verse 4 місяці тому +5

    Make every donation even Rs1 mandatory through digital means. If companies have to hide the fact that they are donating to which political party then mostly it's quid pro pro. Would be interesting to see the data for all for all political parties.

  • @ceaselesswhisperer4254
    @ceaselesswhisperer4254 4 місяці тому +5

    Interviewer should have immediately asked a counter question and demolished Garg's incorrect assertion of 30-35% transparency. It is well known, except to the interviewer (or he is too afraid to say this), that parties get about 90-95% of funding though Electoral Bond.

    • @mtkoshy6284
      @mtkoshy6284 4 місяці тому

      If the hidden agenda of the interviewer was to justify electoral bonds, why would he ask a counter question ⁉️

  • @Oceansta
    @Oceansta 4 місяці тому +1

    Tell me why Electoral bonds worth 1Cr should be transferrable?

  • @Un-known29
    @Un-known29 4 місяці тому +13

    In this case where there are two sides in which one side public interest and other side business men interest , GOVT will go to business men interest side seeing that their profits increase (which is white) will bring more donation in party then in keeping public interest priority.

  • @Sachithgpai
    @Sachithgpai 4 місяці тому +2

    "jo sarkar me Hein, ussi SE tho protection chahiye.. *benefits chahiye*..."
    🫢
    Phir isse electoral bonds kyun kahe.

  • @pmcm5536
    @pmcm5536 4 місяці тому +3

    This secretary supports the Govt as most of the IAS persons do. These IAS people support the Govt irrespective of whether t is right or wrong as they want personal favours from the politicians for their postings.

    • @kedarnathpanda8724
      @kedarnathpanda8724 4 місяці тому

      Atleast they r IAS because they passed a tough exam unlike judges who gets judge post because of his father & uncle despite non meritious having llb degree from substandard law college.
      No uniformity in judges selection create bizzare & wrong verdict as expected.
      Who is bhusan ? He should contest election if he thinks he is great to know the public perception on this issue.

    • @pmcm5536
      @pmcm5536 4 місяці тому

      @@kedarnathpanda8724 Absurd comparisons. Atleast judges are educated, what about politicians????? Why Bushan should stand in elections????? He has upheld people's faith in democracy.

    • @kedarnathpanda8724
      @kedarnathpanda8724 4 місяці тому

      @@pmcm5536 what education ? LLb from substandard law college, judgeship because of father In a opaque manner.
      Pl compare the qualification of present politician, judges would be no where.
      Why SC not divulging the name of corrupt judges in the list given by bhusan.
      Why SC not revealing the final report on sexual Harrssment acqused by Lady on SC judges.
      SC only know to preach but not to follow .

  • @sabyasachijds93
    @sabyasachijds93 4 місяці тому +1

    After the Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court called ELECTORAL BONDS UNCONSTITUTIONAL this is hilarious 😂

  • @ddeb
    @ddeb 4 місяці тому +2

    How shameless! Half truths are more dangerous than lies. Both the interviewer and interviewee are telling half truths and lies.

  • @rams5474
    @rams5474 4 місяці тому +1

    This subject is a very big issue. Why you issue bond every month? To buy MLAs? Wrong practice. Now ask the expenditures from the Electoral fund collrcted. How much each MLA cost?

  • @soumenpaul7544
    @soumenpaul7544 4 місяці тому +1

    Basic question isnwhy should any company donate to any party? Obviously there is some quid pro quo ? Making it anonymous only helps in removing it from the public eye, to be able to find the connection between how much has been donated to a party and what benefits the company has accrued.
    What is so difficult to understand?
    Ofcourse there are other points of these bonds undermining RBI and EC

  • @drmqs9210
    @drmqs9210 4 місяці тому +1

    When voters are people then why companies are donating to political parties . Only citizens of India must be allowed to donate political parties.

  • @shadabahmed
    @shadabahmed 4 місяці тому +1

    Does it sound like? Democracy will run by companies if we follow electroral bond scheme

  • @Natureandlove06
    @Natureandlove06 4 місяці тому +7

    Bohot jyda Dimag laga lia Electoral bond banane balo ne...
    Jo govt.ko milega wo govt.ko pta ni chalega haina ?
    SBI itna bhi independent nahi hai jo Govt.of India ko na bataye...
    Govt.ko to sab pata hoga Opposition ko kisne Donation Dia hai usse k Ghar ED BHEJ DO..
    ELECTORAL BOND LEGALISE CORRUPTION.
    And Convert Black Money into White

  • @rraghur965
    @rraghur965 4 місяці тому +2

    He conveniently leaves out that this is clearly bribery..... says 'govt ko hi diya jata hai... Benefit/protection bhi to wahi dete Hain'

  • @injamulhussain1590
    @injamulhussain1590 3 місяці тому

    Sir ensured safety for his family

  • @injamulhussain1590
    @injamulhussain1590 3 місяці тому

    Indeed a very-clever way to call a bond reform necessary by legitimating anonymity to corporates offering funds

  • @hdamor63
    @hdamor63 4 місяці тому

    There should be ceiling on donations for national, state and regional parties. Democracy is not something which can be purchased and so does the citizens of India.

  • @Indianlogic
    @Indianlogic 3 місяці тому +1

    What this man purposely ommited that that ruling party BJP was getting information on donar within 48 hrs of any other party availing the bond since SBI was sharing this info on daily basis with finance ministry. In this ruling party had advantage and can bully others if anyone dare to donate its rival faction. Earlier large companies and foreigners where not able to fund party in India due to need for cash but with electoral bond this become feasible.

  • @anoopnand
    @anoopnand 4 місяці тому

    Very deep info 05:55 Right Sir thanks👍

  • @pacifikx
    @pacifikx 4 місяці тому +1

    When we are shouting so much about Digital India, then we should have every single rupee by cashless means. The person who doesn't have this facility also should focus more on getting a mobile rather than giving donation.

  • @jamesT008
    @jamesT008 4 місяці тому +2

    So called EX-IAS person is in fvr of bjpigs. Opposition got funding coz of their rule in state while bjpig got funding coz of center rule. Its pure kickback system.

  • @patel.k
    @patel.k 4 місяці тому

    He has a point. We may not like it.

  • @kunalpawar2517
    @kunalpawar2517 4 місяці тому +1

    how to sell a fraud fluently? lesson 101

  • @ManojKumarVishwas
    @ManojKumarVishwas 4 місяці тому +1

    Can u ask this person How much Adani give to BJP and How much company he bought

  • @ManojKumar-vf3xv
    @ManojKumar-vf3xv 4 місяці тому

    This is how bureaucrats typically solve problems and pat their backs. Democracy gayee...me.

  • @arushirana1118
    @arushirana1118 4 місяці тому +2

    Very well explained

  • @rakesh12888
    @rakesh12888 4 місяці тому +1

    Lagta hai , inka hi idea tha, electoral bond ka

  • @satyamvadami2770
    @satyamvadami2770 4 місяці тому

    These person as finance secretary comes with this bond n now what is he doing first of all take back everything from him salary perks etc

  • @preethamarchana7578
    @preethamarchana7578 4 місяці тому +2

    why RBI and EC oppose this?

    • @chetankaler5148
      @chetankaler5148 4 місяці тому

      because it's constituional, large industralists give money to political parties in the form electoral bonds for their own personal benefits

    • @ananyasain1241
      @ananyasain1241 4 місяці тому

      ​@@chetankaler5148 Supreme Court Said This Electoral Bond Scheme is Unconstitutional.
      Where Are You From Andhbh@kt???

    • @chetankaler5148
      @chetankaler5148 4 місяці тому

      @@ananyasain1241 lmao 😂😂, it was a typo. i also wanted to type unconstitutional, i just forgot to write the 'un'. and i literally defined how EB were unconstitutional.

    • @curious_one1156
      @curious_one1156 4 місяці тому

      It is unconstitutional, but will stopping these bonds actually stop corporations from donating to parties ?

    • @chetankaler5148
      @chetankaler5148 4 місяці тому

      @@curious_one1156 atleast there would be transparency

  • @kumarkrishna852
    @kumarkrishna852 4 місяці тому +1

    He is defending his papa😂....

  • @abhisheksingh-ck1nl
    @abhisheksingh-ck1nl 4 місяці тому

    I think it was 2000 rs and not 20000

  • @reepusingh2136
    @reepusingh2136 4 місяці тому +7

    Sorry to say but he needs to check his data, coz what I have read is Bjp is getting 90% of electoral bonds not 60-65% and second there is no transparency, so quid pro quo.. Problem is there(where u can give n take favour)

    • @daniellatifi8260
      @daniellatifi8260 4 місяці тому

      This is what happens when the interviewer is a stupid fellow and interview without any research.

    • @arno557
      @arno557 4 місяці тому

      Bjp got 55% in the last 3 years. Opposition have increased their share from 12% to 45 % 😅😅.

  • @shredder2cop
    @shredder2cop 4 місяці тому

    What is the big idea on this ?
    Has anybody availed Draft facility by banks ?
    It's almost the same concept.
    Bonds buying is not a difficult thing.
    The problem is why public doesn't get to know if Adani has given 10 cr to congress or BJP and get 100 cr business from govt ...

  • @user-jc5gv1zh9c
    @user-jc5gv1zh9c 4 місяці тому

    Ekectrol Bond's is 🍚 Like Sri Krishna got from his old friend Sudhama, it is very clearly accepted that Donation providers and benefiting people's are old friend, it is called full Transperency 😂😂😂😂

  • @kedarnathpanda8724
    @kedarnathpanda8724 4 місяці тому

    A voter has every right to know that on what merit / test chandrachud could be cji. Why the collegium is not publishing the method of selection of judges.
    Why selective Transparency, no Transparency in listing the cases, no Transparency in adjudicating the cases, no Transparency in teesta darsan at mid night.

  • @saurabhamin
    @saurabhamin 4 місяці тому +1

    point is isme galat kya tha !!! white mei he hoga na paisa ! pehele black cash jaata tha. congress has always favoured Cash economy !!

  • @rohitmadashri7250
    @rohitmadashri7250 4 місяці тому

    So lets say out if ten rupees, the ruling party gets 9 rupees and the opposition gets 1. How's it a level playing field for democracy?

  • @dixanshtiwari6003
    @dixanshtiwari6003 4 місяці тому

    Dude got fired and still defending bosses

  • @kedarnathpanda8724
    @kedarnathpanda8724 4 місяці тому

    No Transparency in judges asset , no Transparency why cji took manipur but left suffering of kashmir women. No Transparency why different verdict for juber & nupur. When the cji is messy ,his selection is messy from where the Transparency would come.
    Why no Transparency on verdict of sexual allegation against SC judges.
    Why no Transparency in naming the corrupt judges by bhusan which is suppressed by SC till date .
    Master is diplomacy, bizzare verdict to favour black money for congress & its the only intent of our cji who is a nomine of congress.

  • @samratjpatil
    @samratjpatil 4 місяці тому

    Watch the wires discussion on electoral bonds than this sham.

  • @vivekroshansuri
    @vivekroshansuri 4 місяці тому

    Now back to black money in the form of cash.To many commentrators this appears to be better solution.

  • @kulwindersingh-du6lt
    @kulwindersingh-du6lt 3 місяці тому

    डोनेशन बंद कर देनी चाहिए। इलेक्शन का प्रचार भी बंद होना चाहिए ।वोटर पार्टी का काम देख कर वोट करे।

  • @kishordurve1
    @kishordurve1 4 місяці тому

    This man is smiling shamelessly when he says 'benefits are to be extracted from the ruling party'.

  • @blkuril6728
    @blkuril6728 4 місяці тому

    इलेक्शन मेनेज करने के लिए इतना दिमाग लगाने वाले को मानना पड़ेगा।

  • @devilsadvocate9166
    @devilsadvocate9166 4 місяці тому

    sare IAS s ko ex hone k baad hi imandari ki yaad aati hai...kaam me hote time sab imandar ho jayein to desh jyada sudhar jaye

  • @drsatishparmar9422
    @drsatishparmar9422 4 місяці тому

    Smiling face
    Not serious on
    Both sides.

  • @nishasingh18788
    @nishasingh18788 4 місяці тому

    Waah kitni pavitra soch thi. Inke hisaab se toh Supreme toh moorkh hai shayad. 🙏😂😂😂 Achha, chacha yeh bhi bata dete ki 7.5% of profit ka cap hatakar companies jitna chahe donation de sakte hain, iske peeche ki pavitra soch kya thi? 😂😂😂

  • @AryaRishi
    @AryaRishi 4 місяці тому

    Government ko donation chaiye business se, tax chahiye public se wah. Sahi hai. Beta ye krne se na public bachegi na business.

  • @rams5474
    @rams5474 4 місяці тому

    Nothing is true and straight answer no one going to tell. The problem is with tax. Once tax is removed all money directly come into economy.

  • @ShubhamKumar-js8uv
    @ShubhamKumar-js8uv 4 місяці тому

    I think he has not read the Supreme Court judgement about bonds because ruling party can easily know who has funded whom and they know it. The total money given through the electoral bonds in financial year 2022-2023 was almost given wholely to the ruling BJP. 90 percent of money was funded to the ruling party. And there is a lot to electoral bonds it's unconstitutional at any degree even if he is an ex-IAS that doesn't means that if he justifies something using logical fallacy then it would be accepted.
    Civil servants are not GODS. Stop believing them read the judgement.
    Look at how he is justifying something illegal which the honourable supreme court has found illegal.

  • @ps-gh3hu
    @ps-gh3hu 4 місяці тому

    Matlab opposition ke ghode lag gaye SC verdict se 😂

  • @Mohammadi4Humanity
    @Mohammadi4Humanity 4 місяці тому

    Koun si party kiss say donation lay rahi h aur kis kay interest may kaam kar rahi h ,ye jaankaari lena janta ka adhikaar ha.
    Democracy may Janta sab say oopar h aur soochna ka adhikaar RTI Janta ka haq h

  • @trackkerssecurity7252
    @trackkerssecurity7252 4 місяці тому

    Modi ji to ekdum masoom the..unko kahan kuch samajh ata hai

  • @ravi-it3vj
    @ravi-it3vj 4 місяці тому

    dont tell a lie. check the. amount before 2014. You will be surprised. 138 yr old party struggling for fund says it all.

  • @abisheklunia
    @abisheklunia 4 місяці тому

    Why not remove the cash limit of 20k? Why not make it mandatory to donate by UPI? If ordinary voter wants to donate(which is very rare) he can donate thru UPI. Company can donate thru normal bank transfer. Why electoral bond in all this? With bond, even foreign owned company can donate in india (eg. Amazon, Meta) anonymously. And where is the confidentialty for donors? The ruling party (which runs the govt, which owns SBI) knows who gave to whom.
    Garg saab ke saare thark jhoote saabit hue. SC ne electoral bond ko a-samvidhanik karaar diya hai aur is poore fraud scheme ko raddh kar diya hai.
    Garg saab jaise gyani log apne padhai aur gyan ka galat istemaal karke neta logon ko aise bakwaas scheme banana sikhate hain.

  • @rohankubasad1821
    @rohankubasad1821 4 місяці тому

    PURA SACH TO SIRF MEDIA WALE HI JAANTE HAI 🤣🤣🤣🤑🤑🤑💄💄💄

  • @sanjanameenasanjanameena
    @sanjanameenasanjanameena 4 місяці тому

    अगर सब 20हजार का डोनेशन ही देते थे तो फिर बीजेपी हजारों करोड़ खा sy लाई

  • @deepakrahi
    @deepakrahi 4 місяці тому

    Biased opinion..Agla CAG or RBI Governor

  • @foxusanews
    @foxusanews 4 місяці тому

    liked

  • @1Thisthathesethose
    @1Thisthathesethose 4 місяці тому

    Sir apne bhi todha khaya hi hoga?

  • @suyashprksh
    @suyashprksh 4 місяці тому

    jaate jaate isne bta dia ki ye ex ias bhi andhbhakt hai.

  • @user-ys9bj8ot2x
    @user-ys9bj8ot2x 4 місяці тому

    Isko seat chahiye hoge....😂

  • @abhijaiswal3961
    @abhijaiswal3961 4 місяці тому

    Ek baat hai ki paisa kharcha hota hai aap ek mukhya ke chunav lade to 1crore tak kharcha hota . Aur dusri baat hai ki koi business man chanda ke roop me koi party ko deta agar ye nahi hua to kya karegi waise chara ghotala hoga bofors ghotala jo logo ka paisa hota hai seedha and cut baat😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @kvprasad4
    @kvprasad4 4 місяці тому

    95% to BJP and 5% to others

  • @ulhaskShanbhag-gi2md
    @ulhaskShanbhag-gi2md 4 місяці тому

    A ias nahi 😮isi ka lagta hai😢

  • @wellnessforall6663
    @wellnessforall6663 4 місяці тому

    BJP ने भ्रष्टाचार के सारे रिकॉर्ड ध्वस्त कर दिए हैं।

  • @ahamathsClasses
    @ahamathsClasses 4 місяці тому

    Kis murkh ko baitha liye bhai, isko ye bhi nahi pata ki jo sarkar mein rahega usko sara imformation to mil hi jayega ga ki kon kitna paisa de raha hain.
    Aur jo pahle cash mein milta tha usko sirf bank mein kar deta, to cash wala problem solve.
    Aur public se paisa kamyega aur public ko hi nahi bateyega?
    Isse achha koi class 10th ke student se puch leta wo achha answer deta.

  • @iamvivek9876
    @iamvivek9876 4 місяці тому

    3:16 koi sense h iss bat ka ? kuchj v bol rhe

  • @khadirkhan9681
    @khadirkhan9681 3 місяці тому

    UA-cam godi media😅

  • @rajparab5051
    @rajparab5051 4 місяці тому

    here is the catch
    SBI knows who buys the bond
    and govt is the owner of sbi
    so the govt says
    you scratch my back
    i scratch yours

    • @varungautam8826
      @varungautam8826 4 місяці тому

      There is no scratching back, PSBs simply do whatever the government says.

    • @ananyasain1241
      @ananyasain1241 4 місяці тому

      ​@@varungautam8826 Yes There is Scratching Back Strategy.
      This is Called Protection Money Legalised By BJP & Terrorist Organisation RSS.

  • @hirakjyotichakraborty9180
    @hirakjyotichakraborty9180 4 місяці тому

    Conveniently hiding the truth that the maximum donation cap of 7.5% of total profit was removed, in fact essentially ensuring that loss making companies can also make a donation (of course to get a loan waiver); also FCRA was changed to make it easier for foreign cos. To make a donation. I mean Supreme court has made their verdict very clear that the transparency in political funding is absolutelt essential as thhe public needs to know, who influences the decisions of the decision makers they chose by voting. And this person is so conveniently lamenting on behalf of the opposition? Sir, please remember the PIL was filed only by 1 political party CPIM, which didn't take 1 single rupee donation through electoral bonds along with NGO ADR. All the other parties never even said they have a problem with this scheme. Don't try to paint this as something the opposifion was against please. Have some self respect.

  • @muditbhardwaj1845
    @muditbhardwaj1845 4 місяці тому +1

    92 percent bjp ko mila hai

  • @sankalphouse705
    @sankalphouse705 4 місяці тому

    bhai sabbb tatte de rhe hain.
    Jb compny chq se donation de skti thi tohh usse cash me convert krme ki kyaa jrurat thi??
    Cash ki jrurat uss se hi pdti thi jo "gupt daan" de k apna kaam krwana chahta tha.

  • @argonneon4938
    @argonneon4938 4 місяці тому

    Kuch bhi dono me apne phaide ke liye hi donation dete hai

  • @udayshan888
    @udayshan888 4 місяці тому

    Bhrashtachar Jumla Party.😢

  • @NEERAJSINGH-jl7hm
    @NEERAJSINGH-jl7hm 4 місяці тому

    Modi ka fan lag raha hai, khulla facts galat bata raha hai, jhooth bol kr. Chehre me muskan bhi hai. Wah 😂

  • @rshelar377
    @rshelar377 4 місяці тому

    Padelikhe andh bhakt

  • @Msaheb9740
    @Msaheb9740 4 місяці тому +1

    Why always general category blindly support BJP, even when they know bjp is wrong, don't they think what if other category person like sc st obc, also starts thinking like them they and there orthodox thinking will be obliterated in entirety. The most flexible and intellectual class nowadays is of obcs who really don't vote on caste cause if they have done bjp wouldn't have ever been in power.

  • @NielHirjee
    @NielHirjee 4 місяці тому

    Bjp spokesperson hai.

  • @dnyaneshpatil3921
    @dnyaneshpatil3921 4 місяці тому

    Ex IAS clearly wants new job.

  • @user-lo9cv3ui7o
    @user-lo9cv3ui7o 4 місяці тому +1

    Half baked truth
    channel unsubscribe