Article 370 Hearing, 370 Will End, CJI Tutors Sibal

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
  • Article 370 Hearing, 370 Will End, CJI Tutors Sibal #SupremeCourtIndia #LawChakra
    Visit Our Website:- lawchakra.in/
    Patna High Court Karnataka High Court Live Stream.
    #Patnahighcourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Supremecourt
    Courtesy :- Supreme Court of India
    Books on Constitution:- amzn.to/3rqFpbh
    Tools Used for editing:- amzn.to/3EelR1r
    For business Enquiries:- enquire@lawchakra.in
    #SupremeCourt#Mussorrie #advocate #lawyer #legal #livehighcourt #indianlaw #law #live #court #argument #criminaljustice #guiltyminds #learnadvocacy #courtlive #justicelive #lawmotivation #beajudge #ias #judge #law #legal #patnahighcourt #justiceashutoshkumar #judiciary #motivation #learnlaw #IAS #supremecourtofindia #IPS #2022 #Patnahighcourtstream #orissahighcourt #SupremeCourt #Orissahighcourt#GujaratHighCourt
    #Law #Chakra#JusticeAshutoshkumar
    *This Video is strictly for Legal Awareness & Education Purpose only.📚
    🙏 Follow us on twitter, Instagram and facebook.
    @Lawchakra
    👉Twitter
    / lawchakra
    👉 Instagram.
    / lawchakras
    📑*Fair Use Policy -*
    Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 840

  • @chittaranjandas7140
    @chittaranjandas7140 Рік тому +654

    Sibal feels he can create technical ambiguity and twist the case on his favour but
    Honble Judges are alao equal careful.

    • @suvarnanaik8261
      @suvarnanaik8261 Рік тому +3

      😂👍

    • @Surihampi
      @Surihampi Рік тому +30

      Honorable Judges are not only careful but they are brilliant and impartial. This is why when everything fails to do justice, we believe in Honorable Courts for justice. Hats off to them.

    • @ubaidarshad
      @ubaidarshad Рік тому +2

      @@Surihampiwhat is justice according to you

    • @positive120
      @positive120 Рік тому +9

      ​@@ubaidarshadmake people to abide by laws framed by democratically elected
      Indian govt.

    • @cccc2740
      @cccc2740 Рік тому +3

      @@ubaidarshad 70 year old not being able to 6 year old girl..first point of justice...

  • @ParikhTirth
    @ParikhTirth Рік тому +325

    The fact is Amit Shah and team has done the job so flawlessly that no arguments are worthy enough to reverse the decision... Amit Shah in his reply confidently spoke that there is no way this can be reversed

    • @ritakaul99
      @ritakaul99 Рік тому

      887

    • @Northby
      @Northby 3 місяці тому

      Park thirth, mind this great man sibal, who, ten yers ago, try arduosly to pour buckets of water, into the millions of "chulas " India's homes. Inlastcongress regime!

  • @digvijaysingh2305
    @digvijaysingh2305 Рік тому +262

    Sibal is down to the level of "Chahe mujhe pitt do, lekin gariyao mat".
    😂😂😂

  • @asrajan2489
    @asrajan2489 Рік тому +290

    Mr. Sibal confuses to the maximum. Honourable Judges should be very careful in dealing with him.

    • @bahdeng5588
      @bahdeng5588 Рік тому +6

      No, Mr. Sibal is 100℅ right.

    • @dalinaik9996
      @dalinaik9996 Рік тому +12

      Anti nation sibal

    • @deepakkumarjoshi
      @deepakkumarjoshi Рік тому +1

      Subal said what's in the constitution, centre can't make Uttar Pradesh as union territory just because they don't like ppl there, same goes for jNk, ppl should decide.

    • @AnilSharma-vo8ok
      @AnilSharma-vo8ok Рік тому +3

      ​@@deepakkumarjoshi for you kind information J&k is not UT.

    • @NavjotSidhu-s6z
      @NavjotSidhu-s6z 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@AnilSharma-vo8okDo you lack even basic comprehension?

  • @rocketsingh4830
    @rocketsingh4830 Рік тому +165

    What a waste of time by a senior sc lawyer once in congress, habits don't go easily 😂😂😂

  • @gvija69
    @gvija69 Рік тому +169

    These two lawyers Sibal and Singhvi are like Imran Khan. They are fighting cases for so many people and on other side making congress weak by weak day by day.
    Good work for BJP

    • @ismail3901
      @ismail3901 Рік тому +5

      They r fighting in behalf of Pakistan

    • @UserBkj
      @UserBkj Рік тому

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @manoharshirsat2864
      @manoharshirsat2864 Рік тому +4

      😂😂They earn Congress looses

  • @Antharishk
    @Antharishk Рік тому +135

    The 370 and Sheik abdulla a gone case. Why so much seriousness on this issue. Why sibal wants Kashmir burning again

    • @dhkw007
      @dhkw007 Рік тому +21

      To make some money. He also knows the result

    • @Saqib_weqyq
      @Saqib_weqyq Рік тому +2

      If it is injustice it will not happen,
      If its justice then it must happen without worrying about further consequences
      Truth must revealed

    • @ishiinghajput1230
      @ishiinghajput1230 Рік тому +14

      @@Saqib_weqyq what injustice, injustice happens with kashmiri pandits did you admit and re habilate them no you wants to make kashmir apart of pakistans it will never happen and poi will back soon

    • @VijayKumar-76
      @VijayKumar-76 Рік тому +1

      Who is fighting for what? Who is on whose side and what this is all for.... Pls someone could explain me
      .. ty

    • @Ashish-rf2eh
      @Ashish-rf2eh Рік тому +10

      @@Saqib_weqyq original victims are kamiri pandit not muslim

  • @sagarviswanathan1956
    @sagarviswanathan1956 Рік тому +83

    Sibal is fighting for money and nothing else. He knows that his argument is hollow and he will only face failure. For Sibal temporary provision can be permanent 😂. How much money he has taken to fight this case which he will lose without a doubt.

  • @sidhainsan1
    @sidhainsan1 Рік тому +171

    Sibal is stuck between temporary and permanent.
    Everyday he is changing his stand.
    For this he charges 25-30 lac per hearing.
    Kismet ho to Natthulal jaisi

    • @ads7506
      @ads7506 Рік тому +17

      He has habit of getting stuck

    • @nagarampasulamogili3912
      @nagarampasulamogili3912 Рік тому +4

      In view of non existence of constitutional assembly of J&K as of now the temporary status of Artcle 370 will become permanently temporary and it will continue to be applicable.

    • @suvarnanaik8261
      @suvarnanaik8261 Рік тому +1

      😂👍

    • @damon5517
      @damon5517 Рік тому +5

      😂😂😂😂 Congress ☕☕☕

    • @nikshrivastava5514
      @nikshrivastava5514 Рік тому +2

      He thinks he can justify his fees by misleading judges.

  • @hanumanthrao3465
    @hanumanthrao3465 Рік тому +174

    I feel like Sibbal is pleading the judges to give him a face saving from this embarrassment.....atleast once say "here you are right Sibbal" but...

    • @TarusScorpene
      @TarusScorpene Рік тому +13

      Agreed. That is why .he keeps saying “ Milords “ after every sentence hoping that the esteemed judges will sympathise with him and rule in his favour. 😂

    • @nageshlali
      @nageshlali Рік тому +5

      Sibal is arguing the case as if he is arguing in a Bail matter very very POOR SHOW

    • @esasidharan6573
      @esasidharan6573 Рік тому

      😅

  • @subramaniampanchacharam9438
    @subramaniampanchacharam9438 Рік тому +109

    Sibal's argument-- if you keep stolen items long enough, then it becomes your property. Humbug arguments. Fiction.

    • @madhusoodananunniyattil9421
      @madhusoodananunniyattil9421 Рік тому +9

      If these guys comes to power, then imagine the situation of India : Let alone Kashmir and Ladakh

    • @deepakkumarjoshi
      @deepakkumarjoshi Рік тому

      ​@@madhusoodananunniyattil9421like the current situation in the china border 😂

  • @subash32118
    @subash32118 Рік тому +52

    HOW MUCH ANTI INDIAN LOBBY IS WORKING IN INDIA

  • @dhrdas
    @dhrdas Рік тому +344

    Congress created the problem in Kashmir. Half of Kashmir was lost due to negligence of Neheru, Neheru went to UN and made it an international dispute, Neheru did not change Article 370 neither Indira Gandhi did although she almost changed the entire constitution. Now when the the temporary article is removed, Congress is again creating trouble to bring it back. What Congress really want?

    • @paapkishtwaer
      @paapkishtwaer Рік тому +9

      modi came to power in2014. how much pok taken back ????

    • @AnkitSingh-zm9dg
      @AnkitSingh-zm9dg Рік тому +82

      @@paapkishtwaerpappu jaisi bate mat kar bro… it cannot be taken back unless UN intervenes, bcz pappu k nehru ne apni marayi ja k UN me… muh ka kaur ni hai ki le lenge… Army can capture it anytime they want but cannot bcz we have not to attack first policy… understand the logics..

    • @raghavendravishwas5929
      @raghavendravishwas5929 Рік тому +2

      ​@@paapkishtwaer👌

    • @abhinavgoswami9574
      @abhinavgoswami9574 Рік тому +34

      ​@@paapkishtwaerHow to say I am immature without saying it...

    • @TheKrish1972
      @TheKrish1972 Рік тому +26

      @@paapkishtwaer in my view, there is no need to get POK because we get 4m more peaceful in this process. As long as there is not killing in Kashmir and life is normal, I am happy. 😂

  • @manjunathaks607
    @manjunathaks607 Рік тому +48

    Sibal is famous for confusing Indian courts by doing China and Pakistani laws in India..😂

  • @nikshrivastava5514
    @nikshrivastava5514 Рік тому +25

    After hearing all the arguments of CJI. It is clear that sibal is just wasting time of the court and acting like a stubborn child that keep on ranting without logic to prove his point.

  • @suryavaliveti8355
    @suryavaliveti8355 Рік тому +40

    He's testing their patience. They will strike down this petition soon.

    • @ranapartap1501
      @ranapartap1501 Рік тому +1

      hopefully they send him to jail for 50 years for wasting time and Jhangerssi suer

  • @prakashnarasimha1044
    @prakashnarasimha1044 Рік тому +27

    Sibal was heard suggesting Brexit like vote for the people of J & K. I wonder what kind of man is this and what kind of mentality is this ?

  • @lasu596
    @lasu596 Рік тому +45

    Sibal lost the case
    He dint hv anything to say except what Abdulla wanted

  • @chatrukripalani7671
    @chatrukripalani7671 Рік тому +210

    Mr Sibal should clarify whether J&K is an integral part of India? If yes, then, how come, it can have its own constitution, national flag, and a prime minister. In that case Mr Sibal should explain why should India have the responsibility of protecting, feeding, and incurring financial expenditure in its development, yet have no authority to protect its own safety and security, and of Hindus living there?

    • @somashreechowdhury2382
      @somashreechowdhury2382 Рік тому +7

      Exact"?"ly so that's exactly what the" messiah,of the santidoot international gang" have to answer,"". Also every

    • @kumark214
      @kumark214 Рік тому +6

      Isn’t it obvious? Because it was given special status by India, just like Assam, Sikkim etc.

    • @somashreechowdhury2382
      @somashreechowdhury2382 Рік тому

      Also every legislation and Articles ,Amendments,proviso,additions,to the Constitution are to be read with the appeasement scenario in which such proviso ,amendments additions,legislations were laid by & under the governance of a govt. as we gather from The history had been headed by Mr. Nehru who did not have a single of the 16 "VOTES" of the representatives representing the people of BHARAT and as such are imperatively questionable????And therefore such proviso, acts, Articles, legislations ,need neccessarily&imperatively be read with such history of appeasement & power sharing formulas that were the cause of such provisos , legislations, amendments , additions outrageous to the sanctity of the power of the government elected

    • @kumark214
      @kumark214 Рік тому +2

      @@somashreechowdhury2382 complete nonsense. Regardless of who is in power, constitution is the same. Anything can be done if allowed by constitution, if not it’s illegal like this repeal.

    • @XPERTEDUCATOR
      @XPERTEDUCATOR Рік тому +1

      Not integral part but temporary part

  • @divyasatheesh2529
    @divyasatheesh2529 Рік тому +21

    Precious court time got wasted!!! CJI should not encourage this.still thousands of laymen are waiting for justice. But nowadays I feel that SC favours VIPs..they are ready to take political cases that too of opposition mostly even at midnight.

  • @AnandSharma-qt3gi
    @AnandSharma-qt3gi Рік тому +74

    Sibbal knows how to exploit loopholes of Constitution by intrepreting it so subjectively.. But judges should be ekadiken ( one step more)

    • @Saumil5
      @Saumil5 Рік тому +2

      Shukracharya hay

  • @chandrasekharakula-m9z
    @chandrasekharakula-m9z Рік тому +73

    Sibal feels, J&K is part of Pakistan, he even feels India to be part of Pakistan too.
    but he wants Indian money, that too in crores per every day of his attendance in court/parliament.

    • @petergriffin6575
      @petergriffin6575 Рік тому +3

      Have u ever read law?

    • @megacharizardx2276
      @megacharizardx2276 Рік тому +7

      ​@@petergriffin6575Plz explain what is a law I'm an law student.
      Sibbal comparing UK & India but he forgets in UK there is no Reservation system SC St Obc doesn't enjoy job food dress from tax payers money is there any equality between UK & India?

    • @petergriffin6575
      @petergriffin6575 Рік тому +1

      @@megacharizardx2276 considering u r a law student let me give u a piece of advice that a lawyer should always see loopholes in the case and argue them and twist the facts to favour him.
      It's not necessary to provide only facts.

    • @chandrasekharakula-m9z
      @chandrasekharakula-m9z Рік тому +1

      @@petergriffin6575 In general sense yes, articles from here and there, cannot say as expert, My comment is not about law, about a person. As a lawyer he may be doing good, his argument struck like Gramaphone needle at one place, he do not want the judges to even debate/venture into other relevant points. if this is what law is, then i do not subscribe to it, my understanding is law should be for greater good not for one or select few!

    • @karma5396
      @karma5396 Рік тому +1

      ​@@petergriffin6575does exploiting loophole strengthen our democracy? Asking as a lay man with zero understanding of Constitution.

  • @susilkumarbarik8304
    @susilkumarbarik8304 Рік тому +42

    Advocate like sibal not only confusing honorable SC but also betry indians and this is the true face of Congress....

  • @vandemataram2506
    @vandemataram2506 Рік тому +36

    After 100/200 years, people will remember Kapil as a Villain Advocate in History!!!

    • @ListenSilent121
      @ListenSilent121 Рік тому

      🎯

    • @bahdeng5588
      @bahdeng5588 Рік тому

      Ater 100/200 yrs people will remember kabil not as villain but as Hero (advocate)like kapil indian cricketer.

  • @RajeevAnand
    @RajeevAnand Рік тому +34

    Sibal needs to take english classes again if he doesn't understand the basic difference between temporary and permanent. This will be a good judgement to also remove caste based reservations which was also temporary.

    • @vinayakdhulap
      @vinayakdhulap Рік тому +1

      The National Conference and the like think that they will always have the dine in and India will take care of the washing and kitchen.Then they were worried of their minority status and reservation. Whats wrong if we say let's all be at the dinner table and enjoy?All states are equal for last 76 years and prosperous.

    • @PC-tz6rw
      @PC-tz6rw Рік тому +1

      You have a case there! Bravo!!

  • @pandit-jee-bihar
    @pandit-jee-bihar Рік тому +37

    Sibal wants 370 to stay not because it's abrogation he deem was unconstitutional but because there is no clarity on when and how a temporary provision became permanent.
    Looks like it became permanent on it's own without exercising 368 because no government said anything till date.
    I think such cases should be dismissed simply based on Article 1, 2 & 3 which gives centre enough power to parliament to reorganise or change the boundaries of any state without state's consent.

  • @RS-sx1lo
    @RS-sx1lo Рік тому +23

    The logic is simple
    J&K is happier and more peaceful now !
    370 has to go !

  • @narsinhgujari3938
    @narsinhgujari3938 Рік тому +3

    Sibal is really gone mad for getting publicity, each and every day we can see , this guy is standing for anti-nationals and sympathy with pak's propoganda.

  • @VipinSingh-vg8iq
    @VipinSingh-vg8iq Рік тому +11

    it feels so sad that we are hearing this kind cases being accepted in the courts of our country that challenges the authority of our country over our own state. Sibal is appearing for some anti-India client here, court shouldn't have accepted the Plea in the first place.
    It's a wastage of taxpayers hard earned money and resources. Moreover, it further raises question on the non-transparent model of working of the judiciary itself.

  • @subbunittala2012
    @subbunittala2012 Рік тому +1

    Wasting tax payed money..on this gone case

  • @muralilakka6161
    @muralilakka6161 Рік тому +1

    This man called Kapil Sibal represents congress party although he is SP MP. He is wasting SC's valuable time for the past three days. CJI should not allow him and his lawyers to make further useless arguments and put fullstop to this.

  • @ramalingamsadasivan2835
    @ramalingamsadasivan2835 Рік тому +7

    How can a politician become a lwayer, conflict of interest.

  • @nimmamithra-learning7647
    @nimmamithra-learning7647 Рік тому +17

    Sibal's procrastination is at the height of his obedience to dynasty.

  • @maheshnag944
    @maheshnag944 Рік тому +4

    कृपया हिंदी में subtitile डालें ताकि हम हिंदीभाषी भी देश के जिम्मेदार लोगों के अनुच्छेद ३७० पर उनके विचार जाने

  • @raghavuchil2098
    @raghavuchil2098 Рік тому +36

    Why we are still folowing British way of addressing judges as " My Lord" ? As per Indian tradition, we must call them at the best " Your Honor" Calling them My Lord makes no sense. Only Lord for us is our Gods and no one else...

    • @sigmamale3115
      @sigmamale3115 Рік тому +2

      Judge k samne jra bolna ye baat....juban se pocha na lgwa dia th wo bhi judge ni

    • @deepakkumarjoshi
      @deepakkumarjoshi Рік тому

      But do you want to use? Old caste based way of addressing?

  • @leelaaiyappa6277
    @leelaaiyappa6277 Рік тому +13

    Well replied by CJI👍

  • @mazerrackham1280
    @mazerrackham1280 Рік тому +68

    As a Kashmiri i have always rejoiced the 370 abrogation since it was nothing but a dead horse and most probably SC will uphold the abrogation as well. What i fail to understand is why is it irking so many people. The deliberations upon it in the highest court only reflects the true character of Indian democracy and the fact that arbitary legislations are liable to be struck down if passed in an illegitimate manner. If you ask me the proceedings itself is enhancing the democratic spirit of the country rather than doing any harm.

    • @miskangan986
      @miskangan986 Рік тому +1

      Mal gudood

    • @malayaranjansahu7650
      @malayaranjansahu7650 Рік тому +4

      same bro...i don't understand why...may be this gives us hint that what national prosperity & security means to these people who are represented by sibal.

    • @Aj.K.R
      @Aj.K.R Рік тому +2

      We love constitution Democracy and Supreme court. We are not biased and court as well to hear any significant cases. Sibbal is trying his best argument. Law is important than your emotions. Law makes a country not an uneducated King.

    • @malayaranjansahu7650
      @malayaranjansahu7650 Рік тому +4

      @@Aj.K.R but is it good to waste time on a sealed case which was needed for the security of India???

    • @ydgokhale1
      @ydgokhale1 Рік тому

      Great point.

  • @theexposer9483
    @theexposer9483 Рік тому +18

    During British time many Indian lawyers use to appear against Indians and one of them was father of j l Nehru. They made lot of money by going against Indians, the same breed of people are still practising even today. No country in this world will have such type of people thriving.

    • @PC-tz6rw
      @PC-tz6rw Рік тому +4

      In fact it is this batch of people who are now termed as liberaaaands!

    • @truthseeker327
      @truthseeker327 Рік тому +3

      they are the lutyens gang or khan market gang. they are extremely intolerant towards those who do not belong to their ilk

    • @medasbabu
      @medasbabu Рік тому +1

      Sad part even after 70 years, we see people like Sibal thriving and given so much importance, he is a national shame.

    • @deepakkumarjoshi
      @deepakkumarjoshi Рік тому

      India is intact bcz of such great ppl not bcz of RSS rioter

    • @PC-tz6rw
      @PC-tz6rw Рік тому

      @@deepakkumarjoshi I can bet you are the devil's advocate!
      Very unlikely that your ID is real. The new law which has been presented in parliament will definitely make life miserable for such a lot , which passes opinions as judgements and truth. Very soon, if you shoot off the hip, even in courts, you'll have to come up with evidence and hearsay will not make a dent on judgements. That goes for fake news and concocted news too!

  • @vipstervipster5002
    @vipstervipster5002 Рік тому +3

    Stop wasting courts time, send Kapil Sibal to Pakistan. Let us close the matter of 370 and solve the evil intent of Kapil Sibal.

  • @rockyvillan562
    @rockyvillan562 Рік тому +6

    If it's temporary it's temporary.
    What's the difference then if it's permanent ??

  • @krkraju7190
    @krkraju7190 Рік тому +2

    I think he is arguing on behalf of PAKISTAN? Why he is so pessimistic on india.

  • @bluesailengineering5003
    @bluesailengineering5003 Рік тому +6

    CHAPPAL IS GOOD AT BAIL ONLY. HE HARDLY WINS ANY CASE.

  • @sarojjena9947
    @sarojjena9947 Рік тому +12

    CHAPPAL IS CONFUSED OF HIS OWN EXISTENCE AS A BHARATIYA. . . . . .

  • @nadieperumal5770
    @nadieperumal5770 Рік тому +8

    \\One thing is for sure: No going Back

  • @utsavgoel8254
    @utsavgoel8254 Рік тому +3

    Who pays for sibbal's fees...is it the Congress party ?

  • @sayand2706
    @sayand2706 Рік тому +7

    Sibal is going round and round but CJI called out his bluff ..

  • @vasudevannagaswamy7068
    @vasudevannagaswamy7068 Рік тому +7

    Akanda Bharat is following sanatana dharma. Every devoted hindu should wake up from slumber and hear what Kapil Sibal is arguing. Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India and all states should follow what is practised from immemorial times. Vallabhai Patel and Ambedkar was not fir article 370. Article 370 has done so much harm to hindus and particularly Kashmiri pandits.

  • @mitron7588
    @mitron7588 Рік тому +6

    4:47 really he is saying that temporary is not part of A370 😂😂😂

  • @sridharancr1542
    @sridharancr1542 Рік тому +2

    This person is not actually presenting the real & sensible arguments which presupposes constuctive & not distructive debate. Not totally non sensible,non sensitive one only for the sake of argument. The arguments at that level should be holistic, meaningful & not a blabber.
    It is not understood how with this standard of low quality, he has become a senior lawyer. Shame on the system that has encouraged, nurtured and appreciated such shallow & hollow blabbering called arguments.
    The saying goes the taste of the pudding is in eating, the maturity & the quality of the arguments can be seen even after 50 long years as he claims, that too at SC level.

  • @kamalakantamohanty7045
    @kamalakantamohanty7045 Рік тому +2

    What 370 will end...370 is history. Can you reverse the creation of Pakistan...then try to reverse 370...

  • @drsubashn4025
    @drsubashn4025 Рік тому +22

    SC has made it clear in its famous judgement that parliament has the power to amend the constitution or enact laws without affecting the basic structure of the constitution. Then why can Art 370 not amended or abrogated or deleted by the parliament? Removal of Art 370 does not affect the basic structure of the constitution !

    • @vishalbharti1139
      @vishalbharti1139 Рік тому +1

      Due to the presence of the explicit process on the removal of Article 370

    • @drsubashn4025
      @drsubashn4025 Рік тому +1

      @vishalbharti1139 can you please explain , sir ? That was an explicit process , otherwise, what other processes are available? Govt did not resort to the ordinance route. I am sorry I do not understand. .

    • @vishalbharti1139
      @vishalbharti1139 Рік тому

      @@drsubashn4025 Sir,it was explicitly mentioned that the abrogation of article 370 can be held by the President but only on the advice of the Constituent Assembly of the J&K which Sibbal is arguing of.What the Union has done is through an implicit process,which is right in the sense and logic but a question on the process of abrogation of the article.

    • @aeonsleo2
      @aeonsleo2 Рік тому +2

      The recommendation to remove 370 should come from constituent assembly because at that time jnk Constitution was not in place. Then Constitution came and elections and constiruent assembly was dissolved. So arguably the recommendation should come from legislative Assembly which wasn't there because of President rule. This isbthe argument.

    • @drsubashn4025
      @drsubashn4025 Рік тому +1

      When J&K constituent assembly was dissolved and J&K constitution was replaced with Indian constitution , was the replacement not 100% ? How come some laws of Indian constitution were not accepted in to-to ? That's what one would expect. All provisions of Indian constitution were accepted and according to the same Indian constitution, govt of India and Indian parliament have the right and capacity amend any law without touching the basic tenets of the Indian constitution. I am not able to understand how some provisions were left out when J&K constitution was replaced with Indian constitution. . .

  • @grpublishers
    @grpublishers 6 місяців тому +2

    Chief Justice should be the role model of our youngsters rather than some chapri influencers.... Look how humble je is and how convincingly he talks.....

  • @anandnairkollam
    @anandnairkollam Рік тому +6

    How does the hon judge have so much time for such cases but not for common man's cases?

  • @ketanpatel-wu3ds
    @ketanpatel-wu3ds Рік тому +7

    Only a selfish lawyer would argue so vehemently for overturning the decision on abrogation of Article 370 which has brought peace to Kashmir and given human rights to the downtrodden segments of Kashmir. Disgusting.

  • @sarmanudurupati7618
    @sarmanudurupati7618 Рік тому +2

    Nehru and Abdullah made all this nonsense. India has to bear all this nonsense all these days, because of Congress. It is evendent from thier so many deeds they are against the Hindus or sanathana Dharma which is the back bone of ondian culture

  • @ranjnasandeep
    @ranjnasandeep Рік тому +29

    Sibal feels that he can make fool any one

  • @damodharkarale5939
    @damodharkarale5939 Рік тому +1

    सिब्बलको Vote Bank बनाना है।

  • @sairamsairam9890
    @sairamsairam9890 Рік тому +6

    I hope S C will DISMISS the Application...

    • @paapkishtwaer
      @paapkishtwaer Рік тому

      what if they give verdict against the abrogation ?

    • @vikasgowda1391
      @vikasgowda1391 Рік тому

      ​@@paapkishtwaerhell no, just see the cross questions by CJI to sibal. And even CJI know if he restore 370 then central govt will pass the bill in both houses easily because if any opposition goes against it then it will be a death of their own in upcoming elections.

  • @ManoharRao-yo8ir
    @ManoharRao-yo8ir 5 місяців тому +2

    Mr sibal always argues for defaulters

  • @sugatomitra6391
    @sugatomitra6391 Рік тому +2

    Supreme Court judges have all the time in the world to hear such nonsense cases, but no time to hear cases that affect the lives of common people. I would rather go and see a circus than such frivolous and useless arguments.

  • @kingjulien3511
    @kingjulien3511 6 місяців тому +1

    CJI argument are way better then SG.😂... seems CJI took charge of SG

  • @kamathmanoj
    @kamathmanoj 5 місяців тому +1

    How is CJI allowing Seeballs to interrupt his own speech 😮 contempt 😡

  • @jayakeshavan8047
    @jayakeshavan8047 Рік тому +1

    Whom sibal is representing. Is it Abdulla or muftis or Pakistan.

  • @jagbhushanjagbhushansingh2111
    @jagbhushanjagbhushansingh2111 Рік тому +1

    Sir plzz 371 article apply in j&k state and restore statehood 🇮🇳 371 article one nation one flag 🇮🇳 and one savidan

  • @RakeshVerma-tv8wi
    @RakeshVerma-tv8wi Рік тому +1

    Current government had cleaned the whole mess which was created by Chacha Nehru and Congress by abrogating article 370. Thank god they did that, what is the point of having 2 constitutions in a single country.

  • @Lakshyam9
    @Lakshyam9 Рік тому +1

    6.38 _ CJI nails it. The 370 was a temporary provision brought in- the Constituent Assembly of J&K could have made it permanent. They didn't , while agreeing to acede to India.
    Assembly dissolved.
    370 remains a TEMPORARY providion, NEVER made permanent.
    Case closed.
    Bye Sibal.
    Sibal has no case.

  • @XineoMatrix
    @XineoMatrix Рік тому +1

    Arey Sibbal saab, kitna temporary khichoge.. plz wrap up and end the session.. Our indian army and people are waiting, we want permanent J&K as a top heaven state of bharat. Judge bhaiyo and beheno kaha fase ho idhar, chalo bindhast hoke J&K ghumne.

  • @arunachalamhariharan9082
    @arunachalamhariharan9082 Рік тому +1

    Let Sibbal find his place of peace in PAKISTAN with his cronies .

  • @sheikhnissar2358
    @sheikhnissar2358 Рік тому +1

    Caption is misleading … it should. Be Sibal tutors judge . Anyways.. it’s clear that the way 370was abrogated was unconstitutional.

  • @shankarcg786
    @shankarcg786 Рік тому +3

    When in 1976 the word secular was introduced when half the parliament was in jail that was not violation of constitution 😊

  • @vaghelas4719
    @vaghelas4719 Рік тому +6

    Some body must challange "secualr word" Introduced in Constitution by Indira Gandhi during imergency on similar ground

  • @ghosh9903
    @ghosh9903 Рік тому +1

    Why Mr Sibal confusing CJI ?

  • @pullamraju4855
    @pullamraju4855 Рік тому +1

    Jihadi lawer is this kapi, taking crores from 🇨🇳&🇵🇰!?

  • @purushottamdakua6328
    @purushottamdakua6328 Рік тому +1

    Janta hai to desh hai desh hai to constitution hai janta constitution ko mante hain ishiliye constitution ka power hai ... Ishiliye Janta ke bhabnao ke sath mat khelo koi bhi faisla esa mat karo ke janta bhadak uthe fir janta ish constitution ko hi na badal de...

  • @sheoran56
    @sheoran56 Рік тому +1

    Sibal :- _Law Kya Hota Hai, Anti India Kaam Karne Hai To Bol_

  • @pawanballi
    @pawanballi Рік тому +4

    No law supreme than country.....
    Always first nation...... Law should be changed according to the need and conditions of the country....

    • @truthexposed4403
      @truthexposed4403 Рік тому

      Country is for the people who want to be governed by themselves by their choices,not by foreigners or any intruders who autocratically break their laws made for the govern.first human being then country then law it is the actual sequence.

  • @jawaharlalkoul460
    @jawaharlalkoul460 Рік тому +1

    Every second He is unfaithful to his masters who hired him ,he is king Of Chameleon Family,He Has Not Only Bored the Hon'ble Judges But Also Dried And Exhausted Their Bodies With Repeated Same Arguments That HAVE No Legality,Ley Him Allow To Speak Continuously For Months Together Without Countering Him And When Stops Ask Him When Fair Elections Were Held In Jammu And Kashmir And Have Kashmiri Hindus/Pandits Participated In These Elections Before And After Forced and Brutally Migration Then Whole Truth Will Come Out And Will Find Door To Escape. Sir I Promise All Truth Will Come Out About Constitutional Assemblies.

  • @Biswajit2019-n3y
    @Biswajit2019-n3y Рік тому +1

    Kyun faltu ka time barbad kar rahe ho tum log chahoge tab bhi 370 bahaal nei ho sakta. Logon ko naya do faltu time waste na karo.. lakhon log naya pane kelie line me khade hen our tum faltu time waste kar rahe ho court ki ! Ye KapiL Sibbal Pata nei kab marega ye admi 😡

  • @kamathak
    @kamathak Рік тому +2

    Sibbal is clueless.. He is just wasting court's time.

  • @jagdishraj8529
    @jagdishraj8529 Рік тому +1

    Sibbal sir
    Paisa ke chakkar me pade ho
    Baki 370per kush be nhi hone bala

  • @rishavsingh2356
    @rishavsingh2356 Рік тому +5

    Remember Sibil is mp of RS from SP which is part of I.N.D.I.A and he is in court for restoring Article 370.

  • @indopakk
    @indopakk Рік тому +1

    Judge or chief justice has to listen both sides or let them have a debate...is it cji or government advocate....😂😂😂😂

  • @Tanialungte
    @Tanialungte Рік тому +1

    Kapil Sibal ji. Congress power main nahi hai iska Matlab yeh nahi hai ki constitution ka ullangan huwa hai. Yeh insaan batak gya hai. Koi inne yaad dilao ki yeh bhi ek Hindustani nagrig hai

  • @divyamrathi299
    @divyamrathi299 2 місяці тому +1

    I Regret Wasting my 8 minutes and 46 seconds.

  • @muralimohangr8396
    @muralimohangr8396 Рік тому +1

    Kashmiries are not aware of Article 370 .
    Why this fellow is argueing and for whom

  • @777-Movies
    @777-Movies 6 місяців тому +1

    What the Hell , Congress want 370 ?

  • @somashreechowdhury2382
    @somashreechowdhury2382 Рік тому +5

    Particular Officer of the SUPREME COURT is of the FIRM CONVICTION that ..."I am the Supreme law , I am the Supreme court Department of Telecommunication, Governm

  • @bhakarism
    @bhakarism Рік тому +1

    Temporary, permanent, temporary, permanent loop. No other point.

  • @jayaram8950
    @jayaram8950 Рік тому +1

    Whatever may be the arguments J&K is one state among the other states of India. There were Maharajas in all other states also. Democracy is now the King of India. J&K must be treated at par with all other states. It needs no special status. Hyderabad Nizam did not wanted to join Union of India. What was done then? Same applies to J&K also. Article 370 must end. This is the opinion of more than 80% of the people of India.

  • @anandasonar3909
    @anandasonar3909 Рік тому +1

    Cji purely wasting time by entertaining suvh nonsense.
    Cji is wasting time of india which could jv been used by to discuss rohigya or currption related cases... but it looks like leftist hv highjacked judiciary

  • @Atul-gl5qx
    @Atul-gl5qx Рік тому +1

    In salo Congressia ko ham ne 10 sal desh chala ne ke liye diye the.. dhanya he oo voter jo

  • @yogendravasadia7922
    @yogendravasadia7922 Рік тому +1

    There are no merits and convincing Arguments on the part of Mr.Sibble. He is just wasting time and energy as the CJ is the brilliant judge. No need to argue by Govt.siide

  • @peacekeeper9840
    @peacekeeper9840 Рік тому +1

    Waste of taxpayers money.
    Some issues are above law and thats why wars are fought.

  • @HO-mg2yl
    @HO-mg2yl Рік тому +1

    Special status ?? For what ? All are same . Then make all states supperate country ?? With different special status states look like different country ??
    if constitution is wrongly written then correct it ??
    Special states will always devide states from being one ..

  • @143ankur1
    @143ankur1 5 місяців тому +1

    Kapil sibillll congress se bhi gya

  • @uppalurisrinivas583
    @uppalurisrinivas583 Рік тому +1

    Kapil Sibal should be kept in mental asylum for his anti-national activities by misusing his legal profession

  • @nageshlali
    @nageshlali Рік тому +1

    Sibal is arguing the case as if he is arguing in a Bail matter very very POOR SHOW

  • @soumitrajalak9760
    @soumitrajalak9760 Рік тому +1

    Pak ISI invest lot of Dollar 💵 for this drama

  • @spikes1210
    @spikes1210 Рік тому +3

    Sibal. One man who is always hand in hand with anti-India forces

  • @hemantmallapur
    @hemantmallapur 5 місяців тому +1

    If Sibal is Devil's advocate who is the Devil?