I totally disagree with it's the only way to get our rights we have the 2nd Amendment, and no one is using it for what it was intended for if so we would not be talking about this like the government wants us to do so they can brush it off again and again.
@@someoneyouknow525 You need to reread my comment never said that I disagree with the Institute of Justice. I said I disagree that it's the only way to get our rights back. You need to read the comments correctly before you reply
@@tazman9954 lol Then maybe take your own advice because I never said that it's the only way to get our rights back... Nor did anyone in this thread. (Hence the confusion on what the fuck you were talking about genius.)
We need citizens to create grand juries that hold government accountable, and with the authority to jail or take money from the government officials to pay for the damages they cause.
John Three16 - Then who holds the “Citizen controlled grand juries” accountability? You’re back to the kangaroo court scenario. Authority is part of our Constitutional Republic.
@ Rogue Mentality It is an ugly truth. I heard a superior court judge state he was tired of hearing people use the term "freeman on the land". People don't believe me when I tell them the law society has their own language called legalese. The law society created the penal codes(policies of the law society) for the different categories of law they created to generate income from the public. The only law that serves the people properly is known as common law today. AKA Law of the universe, Law of/from time immemorial as well as God's Law. The Law is about determining there was a crime or theft, or wrong committed and providing as just a remedy as possible to the victim. It also is not about punishment, it is about discipline to bring about correction in the wrong doer so offences r not reoccurring.
Jim, agreed. Legalese is a legal word, also known as words of art. You’ll find in all vehicle codes, that all terms that they use, such as vehicle, driver, etc. pertain to someone acting in a commercial way.
people like truth as much as poetry.... and people HATE poetry. a lot easier to just keep their heads in the sand and keep beLIEving that the govt cares about them and wants the best for the people. hahahaha
@@Elwould23 sick govt fuc##ers, It seems more and more like we have been infiltrated by aliens , or Evil , or what ever you want to call it..... nothing makes common sense, nothing seems to be rightious, all the actions and transactions seem to go against the good man.
I have reminded the 9th circuit, in my civil suit (involving Sheriff, judges and prosecutors) "the only absolute for us humans is death." And, "When justice fails, retribution is the solution."
Precident law actually became limited in the 1930s when we finally lost any real pretense that we are still a Republic and previous earlier than a specific date could not be used by attornies in their cases. However, those who are not attornies are probably NOT limited to cases only after that date but they will get unlawful pushback when they try to use them.
@@jessewoodsonjames6669 Does it specifically mention immunity by name? The Constitution has many Amendments that each offer specifi guarantees. Why? So that there can be no plausible deniability when government tries to play the ignorance card. The Constitution also acknowledges "unalienable Rights." Yet even as I write this the fight rages on to establish a Constitutional basis confirming that these Rights apply to women as equally as to men, firmly establishing that it's no longer subject to individual interpretation. So in this same tradition of not leaving to interpretation, why not an Amendment specific to the issue of immunity as well?
And make it a crime for any of our public employees (mainly cops) to carry a firearm while in the daily employment of We, the people. Cops murder 3 citizens every day of the year, needlessly, and criminally. (unless they have audio and video evidence to the contrary)
hahaha, sorry, but that made me laugh more than it should have. that's like telling a kid to punish themselves. taint gonna happen. govt is not there for you, govt does not care about you. govt only seeks to gain more power, that is it's only goal. and to think that it would give any of that power up, is, well, naive
That's actually kind of the issue, at least for qualified immunity, it is NOT even the law, per se! (That's exactly what this episode is all about, were you paying any attention at all?) Qualified immunity is a doctrine (basically a tradition or habit of how to deal with a category of cases by the courts), or a kind of habitually used exception to virtually any law. Civil asset forfeiture is actually part of the law in many states as well as federally; and those laws clearly need to be repealed/abolished. And qualified immunity needs to recognized and acknowledged for the blatantly egregious unjust lure to corruption that it is, as well as a carte blanche for public servants to break the law and commit atrocities against private citizens with impunity; and it needs to be brought to an end!
4th of July. Qualified Immunity can not be used in cases of Constitutional Rights violations. The rights listed in the Constitution, Bill of Rights are the highest and most established laws in US, ratified in 1791, by the Founding Fathers. They are Constitutional Amendment Laws. Don't let malpractice of immunity spread. Rather, the defense must prove good faith.
are they even law? the legislative branch creates law. what is it when the judges decide to create a thing and obey it as if law? sounds like treason to me. we have checks and balances specifically for this
@@azza-in_this_day_and_age It's called a doctrine. Just how bad is Qualified Immunity... it was instituted in 1967, against civil (Constitutional) right workers who were trying to sue police for violating they're civil (Constitutional) rights. And the Justice Black(?) is recorded as saying... "except in cases of established law." There are no laws more established than the Bill of Rights (attached to the Supreme Law of the United States) the Constitution, ratified (yes, that means those are Amendment Laws) in 1791. On it's very first use, it was used against Constitutional Rights (civil) rights workers. It's so absurd, it undermines it's own legitimacy and those of the Supreme Court. They also violated the SCOTUS oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. Basically, all it amounts to is "obstruction of justice" by the judicial system. Soon as you exit the court room, the doctrine holds no weight and never did. But such is the malpractice of law.
@@starbase51shiptestingfacil97 the only doctrine they have comes from the legislature, to my understanding. they dont have authority to create doctrine or law or anything else not specifically instructed unto them by the people and the peoples constitution, do they?
The SJPD murdered an old friend of mine who was distraught and hiding in the crawl space of the home he rented. So instead of helping him they fired tear gas in the confined space killing him by asphyxiation. (It says it is not intended for use in a confined space right on the can) They sat around yukking it up for five hours then did it again to make sure he was dead. And after another five hours had medics go in and retrieve his body. There were better ways to handle the situation but since they were not liable this made for a great way to send someone out for food and get everyone on the force some overtime. The next day the SJ Mercury News deemed my friend guilty of everything from abusing women, dealing drugs, to downloading child pornography on his phone during his 12 hour standoff with the police. (And they had his phone to prove it) They blamed the neighbor who complained about noise, saying he informed them that my friend was armed and dangerous and would not be taken alive. (Which he was not nor did the neighbor make that statement) Plus the home owner gave them permission to do whatever they needed to help my friends situation. Just another day at the office for SJPD and the SJ Mercury News.
how tf would you know?...lol sup Wasky, long time. I see you had autoplay on too. You should come to discord, I've stopped commenting on most vids. No one wants to hear it anywho... Lemme know if you want an invite to discord. :v:
nah, they just know how to work the system (UA-cam search: "WCPO 9,Recycled Cops move from department to department") i put it in a playlist if u can't find it :)
Ronald Reagan put it best " I am from the government and am here to help" is the most frightening statement that could ever be uttered. They mean the 9th circus court.
BUT that statement should NOT be and need not be a frightening thing at all! It is only because our government has become so corrupt and bureaucratic that we are scared by this! It actually kind of funny and very ironic that in many parts of Europe that statement would bring comfort and relief! That is ironic, of course, because the whole point of the formation of this nation and the reason the European immigrants fled Europe was to escape the tyranny and theft/excessive taxation of the European governments (as well as religious and ethnic persecution), and now the tables have turned! And while we extol our unique American "freedom" and our government that is for the people and by the people, blessings that supposedly no other countries have. In Europe, government actually IS, in many cases, for the people, and actually DOES help and protect the "little guy", the weak, sick and poor!
*Qualified immunity* is another word for *fascism.* Will the illustrious courts admit this? *Of course not!* Will government actors admit to perpetrations of tyranny? *No!* People are being psychologically tortured into submission... and often being murdered for challenging injustice. This governmental terrorism began *long before 1984.* The "judicial system" is *not* about truth or justice, but about winning and losing. This video spoke many words, and said absolutely *nothing.* "Good words mean nothing if they don't amount to something." ~Chief Black Kettle, Cheyenne
Judges are some of the lowest criminal slime you'll never suspect are absolutely shameless, worthless, and inherently deluded. They are "People of The Lie". Republican Judges are always the dumbest most fraudulent scum in society. They actually think anyone gives a fuck about their pathetic attempts at rationalizing and intellectualizing their own pathetic bias against justice, freedom, liberty, and equity. If you've ever dealt with The South Dakota Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals......you'll realize just how subverted society is, was, and most likely will be.
WE have a right to redress the government for grievances - if we can afford it and/or the government allows us. Tell me again about "freedom and justice for all!"
Whatever happened to government by consent of the governed? Unless the government gets our consent, we can assume they don't have it. They only have the authority we delegated to them in the first place. If we don't have the right to do something, then how can we have delegated to them the same rights? That's what it means to have a 'representative republic'. They represent us as our agents, not as our overlords or usurpers of our powers and rights.
I know this all to well... I couldn't find a lawyer to take my case, not because i didn't have one, but because they all said they wanted to continue to work in the state, and if they took on my case, they wouldn't be aloud to work in California anymore!!! I fought it pro se, and even know I didn't win, I still prevailed!
One agreement on the opposition to civil forfeitures with senator Bernie Sanders and other similar politicians is insufficient for the other massive wrongs they would do. Have their actions matched their words? Senator Bernie Sanders' bill Medicare for All outlaws competing private medical insurance. This outlawing is wrong and is not needed, it is government take-over. Sanders past remarks on support for communism and opposition to capitalism have doubtless remained the same regardless of his current rhetoric. No to B.S.
If these Cops would be held personally monetary responsible, they would think it through and develop other options to preform their duties. With immunity, they can do it the easiest for them, with no consideration for citizens and property. If insurance companies or governments pay for damages, I doubt the Cops would be able to keep their jobs or get another one in LE. It is called vicarious liability and departments don't like that.
42 U.S.C. § 1983: . . . allows people to sue the government for civil rights violations. It applies when someone acting “under color of” state-level or local law has deprived a person of rights created by the U.S. Constitution or federal statutes. Civil Rights Act of 1871
@@jessiej3991 Whether the CONstitution be one thing or another, this much is certain. It has either authorized such a govt as we have had; or it's been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist. I see you too had auto play on.
Judge made laws.....is that Constitutional? And, don't forget how the pussified, controlled, inbred, shitheads known as the state and fed legislative bodies have also refused to help the citizen by passing reasonable laws that protect what we want protected. Society has been subverted by a very dangerous and well oiled machine-cult. Believe it or not, it is Illuminati-Masonic-Jesuit. It's also Satanic and Luciferian. Mostly, the problem is caused by those who are unamerican...unpatriotic...and unable to control their own reliance on The Seven Deadly Sins (Pride, Envy, Greed, Rage, Sloth, Gluttony, Vanity). Everything about the courts and cops is driven by selfishness.......certainly not altruistic public service. There is nothing so dangerous than those who are not babtized, or have taken communion in a christian church. It's all anti christian. It's all anti God. It's all anti Love. God is Love. The courts and judiciary are the total opposite and serve as proof that society has failed in America because the Authorities were only good at hiding their own self interest.
They MUST be held PERSONALLY, INDIVIDUALLY accountable for their own actions!!! As long as there remains ANY shield, be it insurance purchased by their departments or government, or some form of immunity for their otherwise illegal and harmful, injurious actions, the men and women dressed up in costumes WILL NOT STOP BEHAVING LIKE TYRANTS!!! The insurance companies do not care if they have to pay out more claims! They simply charge higher premiums! The government doesn't care about paying higher premiums because they are spending money stolen, at the point of a gun, from the populace by mercenaries who are also paid with STOLEN MONEY! The cycle WILL NEVER STOP, unless those costumed men and women are forced to think about their actions (and their jobs), BEFORE taking them, conscious of the DIRECT PERSONAL CONSEQUENCES they WILL face if they abuse the power they have been entrusted with and bring harm or injury to those they have SWORN AN OATH OR AFFIRMATION TO PROTECT!!!
Congressional officials have immunity, not false officials claiming they’re government & people with size 14 shoe & a vegan corporate contract have the same immunity!
Apparently not Charles. The Constitution was stripped of its power with the NDAA and The Patriot Act, among others. Enjoy the tyranny my friend - it's only getting worse. Do you enjoy those endless wars we've been in since WW2? Last time I checked - only Congress could declare war. How's the War on Drugs coming along? LOL! How about The War on Terrorism?
Thank you IJ! More donations coming from me and you’re in my new Will now!
4 роки тому+2
when i got out of the police academy i was assigned to the 60 prct in brooklyn ny, coney island. shortly there after a seasoned officer recommended i get a throwaway weapon such as a knife screwdriver gun in case im involved in a bad shooting. i knew then i had to take the firefighters exam.
Wow, someone else who was actually listening! Seems like a huge portion of the comments reveal that they either weren't listening or didn't understand what they were hearing!
One set of rules for state and another for the citizens is unjust and simply untenable. If this situation is not addressed it has to lead anachy. Instead of Congress wasting time and huge resources trying to overrule the voters choice of president, it would be far more useful to come up with laws to normalise the balance of power.
Years ago there was a confrontation in W Philly with a group named MOVE. The end was a police helicopter dropping a satchel charge onto the residents killing many innocents. Was broad cast live
Quantifiable Immunity is the very reason there is a second amendment to remove tyrants who make laws to protect themselves for their criminal tyrannical activities.
No law enforcement officer or judge knows 1/4 of the laws on the books and decisions made by appellate courts. Every day you have officers attempting to enforce policy or things they think are law and are not
That long standoff with an empty house must have been _traumatic_ for those police officers. I hope they got time off and the necessary counseling. < /sarcasm >
Oh this is so horrible. I am glad that I am on the way out of this world. If I would have known this when i was younger, I would have been fighting this big time. People need to protest this. There will be a lot of vigilantes running around here seeking justice.
This would all be fixed if the Gov remembered it's "for the people, by the people" and protect citizens instead of the Gov. We were warned that positions of power attract those that would seek to abuse it. I'm greatful IJ is fighting for us!
I'm being censored , so I'll try here again: 7:27, that's where the jury are judges and the man posing as a judge is present as a witness to pass the judgment over to the man wronged who then has the court clerk, who is also a witness, to file the judgment, then the man wronged takes the judgment to the sheriff and orders the sheriff to seize the wrong-doers property, (this is only after the surety bond ; pension, doesn't cover the debt ), and auctions the property to pay the debt. If the debt still isn't meet write an order of garnishment for wages.
And a case. The James King case 2016. A FBI agent and Police Officer beat a innocent man and violated every right. Legal officials are getting out of control and irresponsible.
I could never get an attorney to help me after Harris county sheriffs department officers went to the wrong address and refused to show me a search warrant for the person they were looking for.No attorney would take my case.I was told that because of qualified immunity that my case would not be feasible to the attorney's..
This is the result of Congress creating the Administrative State. Seeking a legal solution is an exercise in futility. We must hold our elected officials accountable.
This is an idea who's time has come. Kudos to the Institute for Justice, couldn't be a better time to be making these kinds of desperately needed changes, there is definitely 'something in the air'.
Congress could amend 42usc1983 to provide strict liability (which they would not be likely to do) OR to provide liability based on respondent superior. i.e., deem political subdivisions responsible for any civil violations committed by any of their agents/officers/employees. (Congress would more likely go for that option)
“What goes around will always come right back around.”~Karma~ “Never ever do to another man nor his own, you likewise would never desire being done to thyself nor thine own.”~Our Elders~
When their judgement comes that same arbitrariness will be given back to them. This is their kingdom and the kingdom to come will they not inherit. So I say let them keep going with their lawlessness and building up their kingdom here until they are taken away. Good luck
Insurable risks are still covered by the tax payers as they are the ones paying for the insurance coverage. Until part of the burden for doing bad government directly starts to impact the folks in government that did bad, they have no real motivation to do better.
What does a reasonable look like? Where can we see an example? Asking the government to be held accountable to reasonable behavior has got to be a joke. It is an old joke you just don't get it.
Good program everytown city should have these along with mAndatory debates with leaders on what police are doing on our streets. and put policies in place to protect citizens from this abuse .Don't need the Federal courts to tell us this is wrong. and that we can't hold people accountable for their actions even if they where a badge. we are all equal under the law.
Personally, I say make the government officials and cops personally carry liability insurance. If they screw up, they have to pay higher premiums...or they lose their insurance and their jobs at the same time. As long as those in power are insulated from the consequences of their decisions and aren't PERSONALLY held responsible, this kind of crap will continue.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
@@sweetbread9008 I hear that a lot. I researched it long ago. They are interchangeable; completely synonymous. I use unalienable when it would be more difficult to speak the line and inalienable when it flows well enough. For example, "the exercise of unalienable individual rights" flows better to me spoken when compared to "the exercise of inalienable individual rights." When speaking, I would often stumble over "inalienable individual." The choice to use one or the other is that of style rather than definition since they both mean precisely the same thing. grammarist.com/usage/inalienable-unalienable/
If it was the judges house it would have been taken care of within days. If it was the judges son that was sitting instead of laying down he would have been awarded millions.
Thanks for your effort. We need people actively trying to fix problems like this. I feel it really helps public opinion of the government and I believe opinions and justice from the government now is low.
I don't know if I agree that private citizens should be able to sue government officials as a private individual. For something they did in their official capacity except for maybe some certain circumstances, but I totally think we should be allowed to sue the agency or government entity responsible if a cop does something illegal sue the police department, if a prosecutor does something illegal sue their office
Okay..okay I got one. I was arrested for growing nine small plants in my bedroom closet, and my LANDLORD gave consent to search to the police and oh yeah, they kicked the shit out of that apartment, holes in walls even a broken window. My roommate and I (he was arrested too) were like WTF. So I was sentenced to 80 days in jail and while there I was arrested for criminal mischief in the 4th degree, a felony, for the damage to the apartment. It was a total scam, the charges were dismissed once I agreed to pay the insurance deductible. I am SOOO glad they are going after this shit. They need to try to do something about asset forfeiture too. That is legalized theft. And the courts and police do it all the time.
All Statutes or provision that causes or results in the infringement, impairment or restriction of any God given Rights protected by the Constitution MUST be declared by the PEOPLE or the U.S. Supreme Court and NULL AND VOID. The questioned Statute can be Constitutionally impremissible as written on its face or as applied or both. The Statutes are like directives which are like official authoritative instructions that guide and direct police thoughts and behavior and if they are not compliant then they are ordered by supervisors to enforce the UNLAWFUL STATUTES, so police violate their Oath and the Rights of Citizens because they do not want to get fired. Most police know what are doing is UNLAWFUL, but they are just following orders like in Nazi Germany. The justify it by saying I AM JUST DOING MY JOB.
I’ve heard it all now. With the economy in the shape its in and business barely being able to keep their doors open, what genius decided stores couldn’t sell certain goods. You’d think the government would want stores to make as much as the could. Then they could pay for those inconvenient things like rent and electricity.
24:24 @Scott: A 'crescendo' is NOT something that is 'reached'! That would be the climax or the tipping point. The crescendo is growing (lit.) and building process itself of getting to that tipping point or apex. The 'crescendo' enters English from the world of music, specifically classical music notation and training from the Italian language which is still often formally used for orchestral scores or music written to be performed by classically trained instrumentalists/musicians. 'Crescendo' is the present participle of the verb 'crescere' (to grow) in Italian; -a/-endo is equivalent to the -ing verbal suffix in English (commonly known as the present participle) which is used to describe an action which is in a current (or continuous) state of progression.
Well I heard it from a friend who hears it from a friend that they had a dream where police cars all over just blown up all over .on same day clos3 to same time the people said thank you who ever it was
Immunity is amoral and unconstitutional on its face. Even talking about it politely is an insult to any reasonable person's intelligence. _Judges know precisely_ that immunity is an immoral legal trick allowing government agents to knowingly escape responsibility for any crimes they commit, _period!_
They destroyed the woman's property BEFORE entering, and therefore her permission to enter does NOT apply. THAT has been a winning lawsuit many MANY times against police departments. Also, have her sue each and every single one of the individual officers that launched a grenade, since as an individual, they overstepped their own sensibilities and competency and are therefore open to individual lawsuits.
I'm so thankful that groups like the Institute for Justice exist.
OutOfSight123 I thank God for these servants of Godly justice rooted in Christian principle of His righteousness.
I totally disagree with it's the only way to get our rights we have the 2nd Amendment, and no one is using it for what it was intended for if so we would not be talking about this like the government wants us to do so they can brush it off again and again.
@@tazman9954 You disagree that we are thankful for the Institute of Justice? lol
@@someoneyouknow525 You need to reread my comment never said that I disagree with the Institute of Justice. I said I disagree that it's the only way to get our rights back. You need to read the comments correctly before you reply
@@tazman9954 lol Then maybe take your own advice because I never said that it's the only way to get our rights back... Nor did anyone in this thread. (Hence the confusion on what the fuck you were talking about genius.)
We need citizens to create grand juries that hold government accountable, and with the authority to jail or take money from the government officials to pay for the damages they cause.
John Three16 - Then who holds the “Citizen controlled grand juries” accountability? You’re back to the kangaroo court scenario. Authority is part of our Constitutional Republic.
Good luck with that. They call the police at any and all organized marches and if the police can't handle then the national guard are called.
@ Rogue Mentality It is an ugly truth. I heard a superior court judge state he was tired of hearing people use the term "freeman on the land". People don't believe me when I tell them the law society has their own language called legalese. The law society created the penal codes(policies of the law society) for the different categories of law they created to generate income from the public. The only law that serves the people properly is known as common law today. AKA Law of the universe, Law of/from time immemorial as well as God's Law. The Law is about determining there was a crime or theft, or wrong committed and providing as just a remedy as possible to the victim. It also is not about punishment, it is about discipline to bring about correction in the wrong doer so offences r not reoccurring.
And a fuckton more jury nullification.
Jim, agreed. Legalese is a legal word, also known as words of art. You’ll find in all vehicle codes, that all terms that they use, such as vehicle, driver, etc. pertain to someone acting in a commercial way.
Stand your ground , never give up on truth, speak loud and keep fighting, be public
I agree Christopher - However that takes HUGE courage to do. Not many folks have that kind of conviction anymore.
@@skippylippy547 AMERICAN VALUES 1776
evolution to snowflakes is bull shit
people like truth as much as poetry.... and people HATE poetry. a lot easier to just keep their heads in the sand and keep beLIEving that the govt cares about them and wants the best for the people. hahahaha
@@Elwould23 Right.
And we got COVID-19 from government scientists. As well as Ebola, H1N1, HIV and others.
@@Elwould23 sick govt fuc##ers,
It seems more and more like we have been infiltrated by aliens , or Evil , or what ever you want to call it..... nothing makes common sense, nothing seems to be rightious, all the actions and transactions seem to go against the good man.
I have reminded the 9th circuit, in my civil suit (involving Sheriff, judges and prosecutors) "the only absolute for us humans is death." And, "When justice fails, retribution is the solution."
you kept it real my brother. till the end my friend. ✌️🙏
Precedent "law" isn't based on justice, but what people have gotten away with.
Yup, it's a JUDICIAL SCAM!
@@rkba4923 oh. So Rosa Parks should have gone to the back of the bus?
@@bartconnolly6104 Yea, that's right Bart. With you!
Well they day justice is blind, it America it seems her eyes were forcibly ripped out and now justice just weeps tears of blood.
Precident law actually became limited in the 1930s when we finally lost any real pretense that we are still a Republic and previous earlier than a specific date could not be used by attornies in their cases. However, those who are not attornies are probably NOT limited to cases only after that date but they will get unlawful pushback when they try to use them.
3:27 "But you won't find it mentioned anywhere in the Constitution." Time for a new Amendment outright banning government immunity in all its forms?
convention of states article 5
@@jessewoodsonjames6669 Beware a Convention of States, we might end up with something worse than we have now!
@@jessewoodsonjames6669 Does it specifically mention immunity by name? The Constitution has many Amendments that each offer specifi guarantees. Why? So that there can be no plausible deniability when government tries to play the ignorance card. The Constitution also acknowledges "unalienable Rights." Yet even as I write this the fight rages on to establish a Constitutional basis confirming that these Rights apply to women as equally as to men, firmly establishing that it's no longer subject to individual interpretation. So in this same tradition of not leaving to interpretation, why not an Amendment specific to the issue of immunity as well?
And make it a crime for any of our public employees (mainly cops) to carry a firearm while in the daily employment of We, the people. Cops murder 3 citizens every day of the year, needlessly, and criminally. (unless they have audio and video evidence to the contrary)
hahaha, sorry, but that made me laugh more than it should have. that's like telling a kid to punish themselves. taint gonna happen. govt is not there for you, govt does not care about you. govt only seeks to gain more power, that is it's only goal. and to think that it would give any of that power up, is, well, naive
This is exactly why certain citizens take matters into their own...FULL STOP!
qualified immunity and civil asset forfeiture are two laws that are completely abused by law enforcement.
That's actually kind of the issue, at least for qualified immunity, it is NOT even the law, per se! (That's exactly what this episode is all about, were you paying any attention at all?) Qualified immunity is a doctrine (basically a tradition or habit of how to deal with a category of cases by the courts), or a kind of habitually used exception to virtually any law. Civil asset forfeiture is actually part of the law in many states as well as federally; and those laws clearly need to be repealed/abolished. And qualified immunity needs to recognized and acknowledged for the blatantly egregious unjust lure to corruption that it is, as well as a carte blanche for public servants to break the law and commit atrocities against private citizens with impunity; and it needs to be brought to an end!
4th of July. Qualified Immunity can not be used in cases of Constitutional Rights violations. The rights listed in the Constitution, Bill of Rights are the highest and most established laws in US, ratified in 1791, by the Founding Fathers. They are Constitutional Amendment Laws.
Don't let malpractice of immunity spread. Rather, the defense must prove good faith.
are they even law? the legislative branch creates law. what is it when the judges decide to create a thing and obey it as if law? sounds like treason to me. we have checks and balances specifically for this
@@azza-in_this_day_and_age It's called a doctrine.
Just how bad is Qualified Immunity... it was instituted in 1967, against civil (Constitutional) right workers who were trying to sue police for violating they're civil (Constitutional) rights.
And the Justice Black(?) is recorded as saying... "except in cases of established law."
There are no laws more established than the Bill of Rights (attached to the Supreme Law of the United States) the Constitution, ratified (yes, that means those are Amendment Laws) in 1791.
On it's very first use, it was used against Constitutional Rights (civil) rights workers.
It's so absurd, it undermines it's own legitimacy and those of the Supreme Court.
They also violated the SCOTUS oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.
Basically, all it amounts to is "obstruction of justice" by the judicial system.
Soon as you exit the court room, the doctrine holds no weight and never did.
But such is the malpractice of law.
@@starbase51shiptestingfacil97 the only doctrine they have comes from the legislature, to my understanding. they dont have authority to create doctrine or law or anything else not specifically instructed unto them by the people and the peoples constitution, do they?
The SJPD murdered an old friend of mine who was distraught and hiding in the crawl space of the home he rented.
So instead of helping him they fired tear gas in the confined space killing him by asphyxiation. (It says it is not intended for use in a confined space right on the can)
They sat around yukking it up for five hours then did it again to make sure he was dead. And after another five hours had medics go in and retrieve his body.
There were better ways to handle the situation but since they were not liable this made for a great way to send someone out for food and get everyone on the force some overtime.
The next day the SJ Mercury News deemed my friend guilty of everything from abusing women, dealing drugs, to downloading child pornography on his phone during his 12 hour standoff with the police. (And they had his phone to prove it)
They blamed the neighbor who complained about noise, saying he informed them that my friend was armed and dangerous and would not be taken alive. (Which he was not nor did the neighbor make that statement)
Plus the home owner gave them permission to do whatever they needed to help my friends situation.
Just another day at the office for SJPD and the SJ Mercury News.
what was your friend's name?
@@AnimalFarmDance Mark Spencer (Google search: "MercuryNews, San Jose officers cleared in tear-gas death of domestic violence suspect")
The government and it's agency's should be held accountable for their actions, we have no immunity, they shouldn't either.
Michael Armstrong, they should be accountable with worse consequences because it also includes “abuse of authority”.
The lesson here is, never never ever give consent
kingdomfor1 - Correct, if she had said no she would have received a hefty settlement.
@@ipsurvivor or got shot for obstructing!
IE IL IL - There’s that...
Never talk to police.
Madatory vacs in Fl.now?
Got it, give a cop a key to the door they’ll go thru the wall. Sounds like government.
how tf would you know?...lol sup Wasky, long time. I see you had autoplay on too. You should come to discord, I've stopped commenting on most vids. No one wants to hear it anywho...
Lemme know if you want an invite to discord. :v:
one of those guys I thought you were dead lol I’ll have to load discord on a device. I’ll hyu when I get it loaded.
Only idiots (taxpayers) continue to keep incompetent retards (government) on the payroll. 😉
nah, they just know how to work the system (UA-cam search: "WCPO 9,Recycled Cops move from department to department") i put it in a playlist if u can't find it :)
Historically most empires crumbled from internal causes.
Keep fighting the good fight! The People appreciate you!
I would argue step it up.
When discussing crooked officials, let's name names and post pics pls
Ronald Reagan put it best " I am from the government and am here to help" is the most frightening statement that could ever be uttered. They mean the 9th circus court.
BUT that statement should NOT be and need not be a frightening thing at all! It is only because our government has become so corrupt and bureaucratic that we are scared by this! It actually kind of funny and very ironic that in many parts of Europe that statement would bring comfort and relief! That is ironic, of course, because the whole point of the formation of this nation and the reason the European immigrants fled Europe was to escape the tyranny and theft/excessive taxation of the European governments (as well as religious and ethnic persecution), and now the tables have turned! And while we extol our unique American "freedom" and our government that is for the people and by the people, blessings that supposedly no other countries have. In Europe, government actually IS, in many cases, for the people, and actually DOES help and protect the "little guy", the weak, sick and poor!
IT'S CALLED TYRANNY.
Judges wallowing in the power of their judgements.
Why not just use the constitution instead of using other courts previous decisions.
Yea i dont understand how these laws can trump the constitution 😒
@@Towelie4200 because America is a corporation. The constitution is just a piece of paper with lies on it.
*Qualified immunity* is another word for *fascism.* Will the illustrious courts admit this? *Of course not!* Will government actors admit to perpetrations of tyranny? *No!* People are being psychologically tortured into submission... and often being murdered for challenging injustice. This governmental terrorism began *long before 1984.*
The "judicial system" is *not* about truth or justice, but about winning and losing.
This video spoke many words, and said absolutely *nothing.*
"Good words mean nothing if they don't amount to something." ~Chief Black Kettle, Cheyenne
Judges are some of the lowest criminal slime you'll never suspect are absolutely shameless, worthless, and inherently deluded. They are "People of The Lie".
Republican Judges are always the dumbest most fraudulent scum in society. They actually think anyone gives a fuck about their pathetic attempts at rationalizing and intellectualizing their own pathetic bias against justice, freedom, liberty, and equity. If you've ever dealt with The South Dakota Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals......you'll realize just how subverted society is, was, and most likely will be.
No need to throw the book when you own it.
DO AWAY WITH THE "IMMUNITY" FOR THUGS!
NEVER GIVE CONSENT~!!!
WE have a right to redress the government for grievances - if we can afford it and/or the government allows us. Tell me again about "freedom and justice for all!"
yes absolutely you have the right to redress the government for grievances as long as the government allows you
Whatever happened to government by consent of the governed? Unless the government gets our consent, we can assume they don't have it. They only have the authority we delegated to them in the first place. If we don't have the right to do something, then how can we have delegated to them the same rights?
That's what it means to have a 'representative republic'. They represent us as our agents, not as our overlords or usurpers of our powers and rights.
I know this all to well... I couldn't find a lawyer to take my case, not because i didn't have one, but because they all said they wanted to continue to work in the state, and if they took on my case, they wouldn't be aloud to work in California anymore!!!
I fought it pro se, and even know I didn't win, I still prevailed!
What was your case?
@@Thoralmir 42 U.S.C.1983 & 1988 for constructional rights violations...
@@mrbigmoney2081 Ummm... -_- ?
@@Thoralmir ???
@@mrbigmoney2081 Details, man, details!
What it boils down to is the taxpayer's has to pay. Must be nice.
The Old Saying "You Can't Fight City Hall"... "I Fought The Law And The Law Won"... It's True!
No one has immunity towards lead and copper. They would be wise to remember this.
One agreement on the opposition to civil forfeitures with senator Bernie Sanders and other similar politicians is insufficient for the other massive wrongs they would do. Have their actions matched their words?
Senator Bernie Sanders' bill Medicare for All outlaws competing private medical insurance. This outlawing is wrong and is not needed, it is government take-over. Sanders past remarks on support for communism and opposition to capitalism have doubtless remained the same regardless of his current rhetoric. No to B.S.
WEEKEND AT BERNIE'S . HE'S ALL READY THE WALKING DEAD .
Everybody real loud, thank you Institute for Justice!!!!!!
And the police wonder why no one trusts them anymore and why they are despised.
End qualified immunity
That's definitely the answer.
If these Cops would be held personally monetary responsible, they would think it through and develop other options to preform their duties. With immunity, they can do it the easiest for them, with no consideration for citizens and property. If insurance companies or governments pay for damages, I doubt the Cops would be able to keep their jobs or get another one in LE. It is called vicarious liability and departments don't like that.
Sunny Day and yet conservatives are silent on this!
I like the way y'all did this video, podcast style educational stories, interview format
I've never been so satisfyingly infuriated. I love this channel.... But.... dammit. I get so mad watching these videos
42 U.S.C. § 1983:
. . . allows people to sue the government for civil rights violations. It applies when someone acting “under color of” state-level or local law has deprived a person of rights created by the U.S. Constitution or federal statutes.
Civil Rights Act of 1871
All public servants that violate human rights should be publically executed
Rights are not created by constitution or man made law.Only created by the creator or natural born rights if you prefer.
if the constitution was the law of the land? there would be no immunity.!!
Except for the 16th Amendment
There is no immunity where brave men rule.
Constitution should be the law
@@jessiej3991 Whether the CONstitution be one thing or another, this much is certain. It has either authorized such a govt as we have had; or it's been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist.
I see you too had auto play on.
Thank you gents. You are amazing, thank you for doing this and helping people who are unable to help themselves. You truly are amazing people.
Thanks for the TRUE news 2 SHARE TO ALL LISTEN to ALL I Can . AMEN 🙃
The REAL reason how they get away with it is THEY are the ones MAKING the rules.
Judge made laws.....is that Constitutional? And, don't forget how the pussified, controlled, inbred, shitheads known as the state and fed legislative bodies have also refused to help the citizen by passing reasonable laws that protect what we want protected. Society has been subverted by a very dangerous and well oiled machine-cult. Believe it or not, it is Illuminati-Masonic-Jesuit. It's also Satanic and Luciferian.
Mostly, the problem is caused by those who are unamerican...unpatriotic...and unable to control their own reliance on The Seven Deadly Sins (Pride, Envy, Greed, Rage, Sloth, Gluttony, Vanity). Everything about the courts and cops is driven by selfishness.......certainly not altruistic public service.
There is nothing so dangerous than those who are not babtized, or have taken communion in a christian church. It's all anti christian. It's all anti God. It's all anti Love. God is Love. The courts and judiciary are the total opposite and serve as proof that society has failed in America because the Authorities were only good at hiding their own self interest.
They MUST be held PERSONALLY, INDIVIDUALLY accountable for their own actions!!! As long as there remains ANY shield, be it insurance purchased by their departments or government, or some form of immunity for their otherwise illegal and harmful, injurious actions, the men and women dressed up in costumes WILL NOT STOP BEHAVING LIKE TYRANTS!!! The insurance companies do not care if they have to pay out more claims! They simply charge higher premiums! The government doesn't care about paying higher premiums because they are spending money stolen, at the point of a gun, from the populace by mercenaries who are also paid with STOLEN MONEY! The cycle WILL NEVER STOP, unless those costumed men and women are forced to think about their actions (and their jobs), BEFORE taking them, conscious of the DIRECT PERSONAL CONSEQUENCES they WILL face if they abuse the power they have been entrusted with and bring harm or injury to those they have SWORN AN OATH OR AFFIRMATION TO PROTECT!!!
it’s amazing this hasn’t started many small wars
I'm hoping for the citizens to at least make the police chief to resign or the mayor and those in city hall won't get reelected.
They're not immune on private land in a trust.
If the person that owns the private land is paying property taxes then they are immune even if you don't want it to be that way
If you think for a second that that land is owned by anyone, stop paying taxes and see how clear it becomes that you do not own it.
@SOUND MINDS I completely agree
Congressional officials have immunity, not false officials claiming they’re government & people with size 14 shoe & a vegan corporate contract have the same immunity!
The constitution has a way of dealing with this kind of out of control government
Apparently not Charles.
The Constitution was stripped of its power with the NDAA and The Patriot Act, among others.
Enjoy the tyranny my friend - it's only getting worse.
Do you enjoy those endless wars we've been in since WW2?
Last time I checked - only Congress could declare war.
How's the War on Drugs coming along? LOL!
How about The War on Terrorism?
Constitution regarded only as suggestions by ruling class,only words on paper.
@@thereport4896 Actually none of this matters anymore - We are all going to die of COVID-19.
@@skippylippy547 The NDAA and Patriot act are just words on paper, you let them stand or fall by your actions.
@@00vTv00 That's not true. Nor is it a valid argument.
Now you go ahead and act out and see where that gets you.
Thank you IJ! More donations coming from me and you’re in my new Will now!
when i got out of the police academy i was assigned to the 60 prct in brooklyn ny, coney island. shortly there after a seasoned officer recommended i get a throwaway weapon such as a knife screwdriver gun in case im involved in a bad shooting. i knew then i had to take the firefighters exam.
3:24 "Immunity doctrines are not in the constitution, it came from judges, courts..."
Paraphrased
Wow, someone else who was actually listening! Seems like a huge portion of the comments reveal that they either weren't listening or didn't understand what they were hearing!
One set of rules for state and another for the citizens is unjust and simply untenable. If this situation is not addressed it has to lead anachy.
Instead of Congress wasting time and huge resources trying to overrule the voters choice of president, it would be far more useful to come up with laws to normalise the balance of power.
This is great!! I just finished printing out a four page letter to send to the Parliamentarian! My story could be a movie.
Hello ALL 🙏 from Louisville KY in the USA 😉
Years ago there was a confrontation in W Philly with a group named MOVE. The end was a police helicopter dropping a satchel charge onto the residents killing many innocents. Was broad cast live
MOVE, should never have had an identity, they would not have to become a target, do not broadcast to your enemy.
@@00vTv00 ~ True but remember the police unnecessarily involved innocents by dropping a bomb on a row house.!
Time for vigilante justice.
Quantifiable Immunity is the very reason there is a second amendment to remove tyrants who make laws to protect themselves for their criminal tyrannical activities.
No law enforcement officer or judge knows 1/4 of the laws on the books and decisions made by appellate courts. Every day you have officers attempting to enforce policy or things they think are law and are not
That long standoff with an empty house must have been _traumatic_ for those police officers. I hope they got time off and the necessary counseling. < /sarcasm >
Immunity can be taken away when Government officials violate a constitutional right. 42 USC 1983
Like those petitions for "crimes against humanity" that never come to trial
government is accountable to those in whose ever deepening pockets it is kept like so may nickels and dimes.
Oh this is so horrible. I am glad that I am on the way out of this world. If I would have known this when i was younger, I would have been fighting this big time. People need to protest this. There will be a lot of vigilantes running around here seeking justice.
Take everything as a case by case basis. Also use what the government has never had "heart" and " common sense ".
This would all be fixed if the Gov remembered it's "for the people, by the people" and protect citizens instead of the Gov. We were warned that positions of power attract those that would seek to abuse it. I'm greatful IJ is fighting for us!
I'm being censored , so I'll try here again: 7:27, that's where the jury are judges and the man posing as a judge is present as a witness to pass the judgment over to the man wronged who then has the court clerk, who is also a witness, to file the judgment, then the man wronged takes the judgment to the sheriff and orders the sheriff to seize the wrong-doers property, (this is only after the surety bond ; pension, doesn't cover the debt ), and auctions the property to pay the debt. If the debt still isn't meet write an order of garnishment for wages.
This is such an inversion of the general law theory. So the government is entitled to do everything that is not explicitly forbidden.
And a case. The James King case 2016. A FBI agent and Police Officer beat a innocent man and violated every right. Legal officials are getting out of control and irresponsible.
While so many people are polishing silverware on this titanic of ours, IFJ are really trying to patch a few holes. Good luck and thank you
I could never get an attorney to help me after Harris county sheriffs department officers went to the wrong address and refused to show me a search warrant for the person they were looking for.No attorney would take my case.I was told that because of qualified immunity that my case would not be feasible to the attorney's..
This is the result of Congress creating the Administrative State. Seeking a legal solution is an exercise in futility. We must hold our elected officials accountable.
ummm any man can sue any man for any harms done by man
This is an idea who's time has come. Kudos to the Institute for Justice, couldn't be a better time to be making these kinds of desperately needed changes, there is definitely 'something in the air'.
The old query about asking a lawyer about how you can legally commit a crime. And, the Answer: Become a cop.
This government is off it's rails. It needs to be replaced immediately, or eliminated all together.
Congress could amend 42usc1983 to provide strict liability (which they would not be likely to do) OR to provide liability based on respondent superior.
i.e., deem political subdivisions responsible for any civil violations committed by any of their agents/officers/employees. (Congress would more likely go for that option)
So the bottom line is; NEVER give consent for ANYTHING, because your property can be destroyed under the "Qualified Immunity," assertion.
Welcome to the california fire. ! ^_^
Money making machine
“What goes around will always come right back around.”~Karma~
“Never ever do to another man nor his own, you likewise would never desire being done to thyself nor thine own.”~Our Elders~
When their judgement comes that same arbitrariness will be given back to them. This is their kingdom and the kingdom to come will they not inherit. So I say let them keep going with their lawlessness and building up their kingdom here until they are taken away. Good luck
We need a website where anyone can post addresses of any gov. tyrant cop, prosecutor, judge etc. So we the people can take care of them.
Insurable risks are still covered by the tax payers as they are the ones paying for the insurance coverage. Until part of the burden for doing bad government directly starts to impact the folks in government that did bad, they have no real motivation to do better.
What does a reasonable look like? Where can we see an example? Asking the government to be held accountable to reasonable behavior has got to be a joke. It is an old joke you just don't get it.
& they wonder what turns people into a Roger Pion or Marvin Heemeyer.
Thank God Blue was ok. If Blue had been shot, police would have said his paw was reaching for his waistband.
First time watching. Loved it! These guys are the best! I'm subbing
Good program everytown city should have these along with mAndatory debates with leaders on what police are doing on our streets. and put policies in place to protect citizens from this abuse .Don't need the Federal courts to tell us this is wrong. and that we can't hold people accountable for their actions even if they where a badge. we are all equal under the law.
Personally, I say make the government officials and cops personally carry liability insurance. If they screw up, they have to pay higher premiums...or they lose their insurance and their jobs at the same time. As long as those in power are insulated from the consequences of their decisions and aren't PERSONALLY held responsible, this kind of crap will continue.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
Hans Oak unalienable? Inalienable? Both seem to fit. For some reason I remember it as inalienable tho. As in not to surrender. Interesting.
@@sweetbread9008 I hear that a lot. I researched it long ago. They are interchangeable; completely synonymous. I use unalienable when it would be more difficult to speak the line and inalienable when it flows well enough.
For example, "the exercise of unalienable individual rights" flows better to me spoken when compared to "the exercise of inalienable individual rights." When speaking, I would often stumble over "inalienable individual." The choice to use one or the other is that of style rather than definition since they both mean precisely the same thing.
grammarist.com/usage/inalienable-unalienable/
Hans Oak the flow off the tongue makes sense. I was almost thinking it was one of those Mandela things. Lol almost.
@@sweetbread9008 Yep. If I hadn't researched it, I too would've thought, "perhaps Mandela Effect."
If it was the judges house it would have been taken care of within days. If it was the judges son that was sitting instead of laying down he would have been awarded millions.
Thank you.
LOL! Judges in the 9th circuit never are embarrassed and have no shame.
Thanks for your effort. We need people actively trying to fix problems like this. I feel it really helps public opinion of the government and I believe opinions and justice from the government now is low.
Can the Supreme Court of the United States be sued for dereliction of duty? Maybe sue Congress to make the courts do their jobs.
This is why we have a Second Amendment people.
I don't know if I agree that private citizens should be able to sue government officials as a private individual. For something they did in their official capacity except for maybe some certain circumstances, but I totally think we should be allowed to sue the agency or government entity responsible if a cop does something illegal sue the police department, if a prosecutor does something illegal sue their office
Okay..okay I got one. I was arrested for growing nine small plants in my bedroom closet, and my LANDLORD gave consent to search to the police and oh yeah, they kicked the shit out of that apartment, holes in walls even a broken window. My roommate and I (he was arrested too) were like WTF. So I was sentenced to 80 days in jail and while there I was arrested for criminal mischief in the 4th degree, a felony, for the damage to the apartment. It was a total scam, the charges were dismissed once I agreed to pay the insurance deductible. I am SOOO glad they are going after this shit. They need to try to do something about asset forfeiture too. That is legalized theft. And the courts and police do it all the time.
All Statutes or provision that causes or results in the infringement, impairment or restriction of any God given Rights protected by the Constitution MUST be declared by the PEOPLE or the U.S. Supreme Court and NULL AND VOID. The questioned Statute can be Constitutionally impremissible as written on its face or as applied or both. The Statutes are like directives which are like official authoritative instructions that guide and direct police thoughts
and behavior and if they are not compliant then they are ordered by supervisors to enforce the UNLAWFUL STATUTES, so police violate their Oath and the Rights of Citizens because they do not want to get fired. Most police know what are doing is UNLAWFUL, but they are just following orders like in Nazi Germany. The justify it by saying I AM JUST DOING MY JOB.
I’ve heard it all now. With the economy in the shape its in and business barely being able to keep their doors open, what genius decided stores couldn’t sell certain goods. You’d think the government would want stores to make as much as the could. Then they could pay for those inconvenient things like rent and electricity.
24:24 @Scott: A 'crescendo' is NOT something that is 'reached'! That would be the climax or the tipping point. The crescendo is growing (lit.) and building process itself of getting to that tipping point or apex. The 'crescendo' enters English from the world of music, specifically classical music notation and training from the Italian language which is still often formally used for orchestral scores or music written to be performed by classically trained instrumentalists/musicians. 'Crescendo' is the present participle of the verb 'crescere' (to grow) in Italian; -a/-endo is equivalent to the -ing verbal suffix in English (commonly known as the present participle) which is used to describe an action which is in a current (or continuous) state of progression.
Well I heard it from a friend who hears it from a friend that they had a dream where police cars all over just blown up all over .on same day clos3 to same time the people said thank you who ever it was
Wouldn’t it be easier to get hands on and use Arpg?
Immunity is amoral and unconstitutional on its face. Even talking about it politely is an insult to any reasonable person's intelligence. _Judges know precisely_ that immunity is an immoral legal trick allowing government agents to knowingly escape responsibility for any crimes they commit, _period!_
The Law has been given by our CREATOR. Follow that.
This world system is sick in the head.
They destroyed the woman's property BEFORE entering, and therefore her permission to enter does NOT apply. THAT has been a winning lawsuit many MANY times against police departments.
Also, have her sue each and every single one of the individual officers that launched a grenade, since as an individual, they overstepped their own sensibilities and competency and are therefore open to individual lawsuits.