The Art Of War (Final Battle) | Battleship | All Action

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 лип 2022
  • Lt. Hopper (Taylor Kitsch) uses a daring tactic to beat the alien invaders once and for all.
    What is Battleship (2012) about?
    An international fleet of ships encounter an alien armada and discover their destructive goals. To defeat their enemies, they are forced to fight an intense battle on sea, land and air.
    Watch full movie here: www.uphe.com/movies/battleship
    Welcome to All Action. A channel that brings you the greatest scenes, explosive moments and more, from the biggest action movies in history.
    Subscribe for more here: / @allaction
    #battleship #alienmovie #scifi #allaction
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,5 тис.

  • @IRONMAN-to7yl
    @IRONMAN-to7yl Рік тому +4405

    "If she leaves you for another, there is always her mother."
    -Sun Tzu Art of war

    • @LarsonChristopher
      @LarsonChristopher Рік тому +51

      A+😎

    • @rickydasudasin
      @rickydasudasin Рік тому +107

      and her younger sister , or both 🥳

    • @LarsonChristopher
      @LarsonChristopher Рік тому +14

      @@rickydasudasin 💯

    • @Can_you_answer-
      @Can_you_answer- Рік тому +11

      I...uh.. is that what art of war really means ..

    • @johnnyreb2241
      @johnnyreb2241 Рік тому +20

      Did that to my ex. All it cost me was a 12 pack. She ran off with two n snuck off while i was at work and aborted our kid. Best payback i ever did. Her mother was 10x better 🤣

  • @truthhitshard
    @truthhitshard Рік тому +12644

    imagine having the technology to travel thru space for thousands of light years and you still have ballistic weapons with no targeting system.

    • @jamessmall6499
      @jamessmall6499 Рік тому +1750

      Honestly looking at their ships, their suits, etc, this was not an invasion army. This looks more like the aliens were like, a mining survey team. They had no ranged weapons, etc. They were likely shooting blasting charges. The tech is just that far advanced the equivalent of a Cat Backhoe is the U.S.S. Missouri in terms of offensive capability.

    • @winwin3428
      @winwin3428 Рік тому +231

      That's why they called it Art of war bro

    • @martinnovotny3148
      @martinnovotny3148 Рік тому +55

      Cry.

    • @Darshan_Loni
      @Darshan_Loni Рік тому +53

      once watch the film bro

    • @paulbouse8565
      @paulbouse8565 Рік тому +309

      @@jamessmall6499 I couldn’t have said it better myself that’s why they were trying to call home to bring the Calvary and the actual troops this is a light security.. the fact the dude who posted this didn’t get this is hilarious and shows his low level of intelligence.

  • @equarg
    @equarg Рік тому +814

    Say what you will about this movie, but they used genuine Japanese and American Veterans and freaking Tokyo Drifted a WW2 Battle Ship.
    Masterpiece 🤌

    • @Alastair_
      @Alastair_ 10 місяців тому +27

      Yeh but they also had Rihanna trying to act..

    • @txgunguy2766
      @txgunguy2766 10 місяців тому +19

      It's an actual centuries old naval combat maneuver known as "club hauling".

    • @alkatheri-pk4hc
      @alkatheri-pk4hc 10 місяців тому +1

      Allah! La ilaha illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He), the Ever Living, the One Who sustains and protects all that exists. Neither slumber, nor sleep overtake Him. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on earth. Who is he that can intercede with Him except with His Permission? He knows what happens to them (His creatures) in this world, and what will happen to them in the Hereafter. And they will never compass anything of His Knowledge except that which He wills. His Kursi extends over the heavens and the earth, and He feels no fatigue in guarding and preserving them. And He is the Most High, the Most Great. [This Verse 2:255 is called Ayatul-Kursi.]
      [Surah al-Baqarah 2: 255]

    • @txgunguy2766
      @txgunguy2766 10 місяців тому +7

      @@alkatheri-pk4hc
      If you say so.

    • @whyjnot420
      @whyjnot420 9 місяців тому +5

      @@txgunguy2766 Kedge or kedging off. Not Keelhauling. It is for moving a ship/boat by bringing the anchor out by ships boats, dropping it, reeling it in, repeat. It is for moving a ship when the wind is not in your favor. Though with a small enough boat, I guess you might be able to drift it :P
      Keelhauling is when you tie a man to a rope and toss him over the bow, then bring him back up at the stern, bounding him off the barnacle encrusted hull the length of the keel. It comes from the Dutch words for the keel (which is just 'kiel') and to lift or to haul up (halen... Frisian aside, Dutch is about as close to English as it gets) and you get "kielhalen". Or in English, keelhaul. Add in the 'ing' suffix and you get the present participle (i.e. doing it right now) keelhauling.
      caveat: 'halen' also apparently can mean "fetch" or "catch".
      addendum: "keel hauling" by rights would be moving a keel around somewhere, as in hauling the keel around, presumably at a shipyard. Keelhauling as in the punishment is a single word.

  • @sapathchakraborty
    @sapathchakraborty 10 місяців тому +357

    "Let's drop some lead on those Mother--""FIRE"
    no badassery can be more badass than this badassest line.

    • @cybercat29
      @cybercat29 3 місяці тому +4

      I second that and agree with you 💯

    • @OliverJacobsen777
      @OliverJacobsen777 2 місяці тому +1

      Even in the heart of heaven, angels can still feel fear? Diablo entering heaven d3

    • @user-vv3dt9my5u
      @user-vv3dt9my5u 24 дні тому

      @@OliverJacobsen777 ไป

    • @TankerYanker55
      @TankerYanker55 5 днів тому

      And then seeing those big guns be let loose

  • @eban_9896
    @eban_9896 Рік тому +2813

    The fact that the “amateurs” second guess the orders and the veterans go straight into the order without thinking makes this so much realistic.

    • @corkingcoggo8375
      @corkingcoggo8375 Рік тому +99

      i mean realistically thats what they should do, If an oder seems deranged, you have a right to speak up.

    • @SendarSlayer
      @SendarSlayer Рік тому +204

      @@corkingcoggo8375 Most soldiers operate with the expectation they don't have the full picture. I don't think many soldiers would disobey, or even hesitate to execute, a command given during a combat situation where everything is on the line. Orders given when its quieter, maybe.

    • @corkingcoggo8375
      @corkingcoggo8375 Рік тому +18

      @@SendarSlayer while I do agree with you there, these naval officers are now trained to question the captian if they believe something is being done that could harm the ship

    • @camelfilters3224
      @camelfilters3224 Рік тому +97

      Guys former Navy here from back in 2000.
      This is all Hollywood and is grossly misrepresented as far as military tacks and so forth.
      The ship has several departments that work together but have their own chain of command contained in each department. We all communicate the basics of a mission, now no one knows what's going on "having the full picture" outside of the top of the command ie the CO (Captian), XO (2nd in command), bridge staff if it's talked about in the bridge, Nav/Com (Navigation and communication), CWO (Chief Warrent officer) maybe and that's about it. The rest of us get a ship wide briefing outlining the over all mission.
      There's also the scuddle butt (rumor mill) that goes around the ship about what's going on but outside of those mentioned we don't know much.
      The only way communication and things like you see in thisovie to happen is if 70%+ of the crew is dead or wounded and even then it would be ordered to return to port rather then be lost if the option is there.
      Another thing "dropping the anchor" in the open ocean is the best way to lose your anchor before even touching the see bed. Not to mention the extreme amount damage to the windless (the system that controls the anchor), the ship and everything else on deck. Believe it or not that entire system for the anchor is manually operated by team of sailors below deck on top side. And that ship wouldn't be doing a G slide to get into gun range, it would nose dive into the water and probably rip off the bow if the anchor WAS to catch something.
      Sorry for the novel long explanation 😅 some movies are close to getting it right and some....well don't really come close. Lol hope some of this helped. 😅

    • @gscurd75
      @gscurd75 Рік тому +30

      @@camelfilters3224 Knew the Gunnery Chief on the USS Missouri. He hates this movie for all those reasons.

  • @gabos7892
    @gabos7892 Рік тому +5229

    This is the most realistic movie I've ever seen. No CGI, no cheesy lines, no fake actors. Masterpiece.

  • @lunch2102
    @lunch2102 Рік тому +136

    I find it hilarious that so many people in the comments fail to realise that the alien weapons are supposed to be the pins from the OG battleship game..

    • @anotherHelldiver
      @anotherHelldiver 2 місяці тому +6

      Oooooooohhhhhh.

    • @jonathanmabardy
      @jonathanmabardy 5 днів тому +2

      That is actually really funny now that I see it

    • @johnrsherwood
      @johnrsherwood 15 годин тому

      It's not every day that you find somebody on the internet comments sections that maintains a pulse and a body temp right around 98 degrees
      Thank you sir for the comment...

    • @russell-xt6mp
      @russell-xt6mp 10 годин тому

      Dude, thats brilliant.

    • @cloudstreets1396
      @cloudstreets1396 9 годин тому

      That is hilarious. People didn’t know that????

  • @jackr2287
    @jackr2287 11 місяців тому +377

    "I want every available plane on this ship, in the air! Now!" Most sensible line in the entire movie.

    • @alkatheri-pk4hc
      @alkatheri-pk4hc 10 місяців тому +3

      Allah! La ilaha illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He), the Ever Living, the One Who sustains and protects all that exists. Neither slumber, nor sleep overtake Him. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on earth. Who is he that can intercede with Him except with His Permission? He knows what happens to them (His creatures) in this world, and what will happen to them in the Hereafter. And they will never compass anything of His Knowledge except that which He wills. His Kursi extends over the heavens and the earth, and He feels no fatigue in guarding and preserving them. And He is the Most High, the Most Great. [This Verse 2:255 is called Ayatul-Kursi.]
      [Surah al-Baqarah 2: 255]

    • @jackr2287
      @jackr2287 9 місяців тому +33

      @@alkatheri-pk4hc What are you trying to accomplish by randomly quoting false prophets?

    • @abzersabar3705
      @abzersabar3705 9 місяців тому

      that wasnt a quote from any prophet. thats a verse in the quran describing the attributes of God@@jackr2287

    • @AstroNovelist54
      @AstroNovelist54 6 місяців тому +1

      @@jackr2287 No it isn't false'.

    • @jackr2287
      @jackr2287 6 місяців тому +9

      @@AstroNovelist54 Tell that to the severed aorta.

  • @secondaccounte1209
    @secondaccounte1209 Рік тому +1972

    "But thats not what it means.. not even close"... best line in the movie

  • @arizuokusawa6953
    @arizuokusawa6953 Рік тому +5440

    10 years later and I'm still getting goosebumps everytime I hear the Veteran claiming that there is no way that aliens sink their Battleship

    • @fakename9008
      @fakename9008 Рік тому +57

      so self-aggrandizing

    • @kamaruddin9172
      @kamaruddin9172 Рік тому +249

      Yes until today none of the battleship ever been sink by aliens.

    • @pro-lb9ix
      @pro-lb9ix Рік тому +36

      i agree.. goosebumps everytime.

    • @pliashmuldba
      @pliashmuldba Рік тому

      Me too but i trigger on " lets drop some lead on these motherfuckers "

    • @beyerch
      @beyerch Рік тому +16

      Yeah, that was a great line.

  • @mrcaboosevg6089
    @mrcaboosevg6089 Рік тому +39

    Drifting a battleship into a full broadside is the greatest thing in cinema

  • @carmennel7092
    @carmennel7092 8 місяців тому +67

    "lets drop some lead on that mother-" "FIRE!" gets me every time

  • @blackknight9156
    @blackknight9156 Рік тому +3892

    No matter how advanced your technology is or how superior your weapon systems are, getting hit by a big boom boom tube still hurts.

    • @colonelthyran7755
      @colonelthyran7755 Рік тому +181

      lobbing unguided stick grenades in an arc.
      Yes, very advanced technology. Much superior.

    • @blackknight9156
      @blackknight9156 Рік тому +93

      @@colonelthyran7755 They are an interstellar species bruh. Primitive concept ≠ Primitive technology

    • @methos-ey9nf
      @methos-ey9nf Рік тому +36

      Stargate SG1 has entered the chat.

    • @colonelthyran7755
      @colonelthyran7755 Рік тому +4

      @@blackknight9156 exactly

    • @tsuaririndoku
      @tsuaririndoku Рік тому +21

      A gun is a gun, it hurts shits and tear everything if it can

  • @jackjames7806
    @jackjames7806 Рік тому +630

    The mastery of engineering needed to design and build these boats truly makes them a work of art. Incredible machines operating on the worlds greatest stage: the open oceans.

    • @eriklerougeuh5772
      @eriklerougeuh5772 Рік тому +4

      sur 6 people for run a battleship :D

    • @J.Wolf90
      @J.Wolf90 11 місяців тому +3

      I've always had some awe for huge boats navy or civilian. They are like independent cities

    • @hadmatter9240
      @hadmatter9240 10 місяців тому

      @@J.Wolf90 Ever been on a WW2 battleship?

    • @J.Wolf90
      @J.Wolf90 10 місяців тому

      @@hadmatter9240 no I havnt

    • @localroger
      @localroger 4 місяці тому

      @@hadmatter9240 I've toured and explored the Alabama. Both claustrophobic and awesome.

  • @clefsan
    @clefsan Рік тому +180

    Imho one of the funniest scenes in the movie. Hopper is so proud of himself for finally getting the meaning of "Art of War" - or so he thinks - only for his japanese battle buddy to dryly tell him "Nope. Not even close." 😂🤣😂

  • @Anamnesis
    @Anamnesis 9 місяців тому +40

    People who think this movie had nothing to do with the board game couldn't be more wrong. The aliens thought they were about to score a direct hit on the Missouri, but it wasn't where they thought it would be. 😆

    • @MorgorDre
      @MorgorDre 2 місяці тому +1

      Still a better story than twilight.

    • @rasenche4562
      @rasenche4562 Місяць тому

      1st i thought it was just a fun Dumb action movie.
      but when i heard it was based on the board game im omg thats so bad XD

  • @jaksdt
    @jaksdt Рік тому +589

    After that anchor is dropped and that battle ship swings around....... Goosebumps!

    • @martyclary1177
      @martyclary1177 Рік тому +38

      Tokyo drift Battleship style

    • @ntombizodwamotsoene7102
      @ntombizodwamotsoene7102 Рік тому +12

      i have watched this movie more 10x i still get goosebumps.... it is a masterpiece 👌

    • @johanvanroekel8253
      @johanvanroekel8253 Рік тому +26

      Yeah it is fun to watch, but totally unrealistic. Even if the achor could touch bottom, (given the depth of the ocean around hawaii, i'd say it can't). Anchors are designed to keep a ship in place when stationary. And even then a ship the size of Missouri would use multiple. That is a 40.000 ton battleship. IRL she'd immediatly snap the chain and keep on going.

    • @jaksdt
      @jaksdt Рік тому +19

      @@johanvanroekel8253 🤣 The anchor bit is unrealistic for you, but nothing about the aliens are? Anyway, it's just a movie mate.

    • @simply_its_shiva
      @simply_its_shiva Рік тому

      @@johanvanroekel8253 Yeah, the most unrealistic things about the video is anchor apart from that everything is believable, like aliens with guns having manual aiming system and ships capabale of creating impenetrable dome of energy, humans with ability to see long distances with binoculars etc all are believable just the anchor part is unrealistic

  • @AnkitThakur-jg8qh
    @AnkitThakur-jg8qh Рік тому +1038

    This final scene is EPIC! While the entire movie may have been average, this final scene made up for it 10 times over

    • @ddm_-
      @ddm_- Рік тому +24

      yeah , so epic a few tons of that anchor turn the whole fucking ship like that lmao

    • @markus539
      @markus539 Рік тому

      @@ddm_- At a point where the ocean is 15000 foot deep^^

    • @aniketmazumdar4637
      @aniketmazumdar4637 Рік тому +12

      @@ddm_- Your name checks out.

    • @pokepikash
      @pokepikash Рік тому +1

      @@ddm_- 🤣🤣🤣so true

    • @MrMaster2262
      @MrMaster2262 Рік тому +1

      Average... i wouldn't go that far!

  • @mr.h1083
    @mr.h1083 Рік тому +16

    Modern have their bells and whistles, but there’s a level of satisfaction when a battleship delivers a full broadside and do what they do best:
    Deliver superior firepower.

  • @Q45t
    @Q45t Рік тому +32

    Nothing is as magnificent as a Iowa Class Battleship.

  • @Furzkampfbomber
    @Furzkampfbomber Рік тому +394

    I don't care what people say about this movie, shallow, stupid, logic flaws... I love this movie and always will. Period.

    • @slobert1970
      @slobert1970 Рік тому +28

      amen. I recognize all the flaws and warts and still love it. a good friday night flick when I dont want to think and just want to be entertained.

    • @cookie_original2770
      @cookie_original2770 Рік тому +13

      People who say they love a movie even if its has all these flaws are the real gigachads.

    • @MrSoulinet
      @MrSoulinet Рік тому +6

      I call a it a guilty pleasure.

    • @paulprovenzano3755
      @paulprovenzano3755 Рік тому +1

      Fkn love it enough to have it in my phone, just in case😂

    • @trevorbrooks9637
      @trevorbrooks9637 7 місяців тому +1

      There will always be a romance about battleships. They were the size of skyscrapers, punched so hard they induced localized earthquakes and did all that while moving almost 40 miles per hour.

  • @Sahilprakash1999
    @Sahilprakash1999 Рік тому +46

    3:47 Beast: YOU ALL RIGHT
    USS Missouri Veteran: they ain't gonna sink this Battleship no way

  • @edwinentertainment5063
    @edwinentertainment5063 Рік тому +44

    Can you imagine getting back to your home and saying to your grandchildren that you brought down an alien spaceship? Such a good day for the veterans.

  • @chrisparkes
    @chrisparkes Рік тому +7

    The anchor handbrake turn is the moment the film gives into its own stupidity and becomes genuinely fun.

    • @txgunguy2766
      @txgunguy2766 10 місяців тому +2

      It's a genuine centuries old naval combat maneuver called "club hauling".

    • @chrisparkes
      @chrisparkes 10 місяців тому

      @@txgunguy2766 🙏🏼 then it’s even more fun!

  • @shadowgaming5139
    @shadowgaming5139 Рік тому +709

    I am not a navy guy but more an army guy however, I respect the massive firepower that battleships have that they give me goosebumps

    • @DetectiveCreeps
      @DetectiveCreeps Рік тому +10

      Look up the USS Texas. The Fat Electrician does a hilarious sotry on it.

    • @ViktorShahter
      @ViktorShahter Рік тому

      Battleships are useless in conditions of modern warfare. It's just big easy target for any modern weapon system. One good rocket can deal more damage on big distances. So you simply can't use this firepower for something else then bombarding some land targets.

    • @sethcourtemanche5738
      @sethcourtemanche5738 Рік тому +7

      16 inch fifty caliber armor piercing with high explosive filler to be precise

    • @butercumdribbleiii8033
      @butercumdribbleiii8033 Рік тому +6

      As field artillery I can appreciate big boom devices

    • @JSolisHD
      @JSolisHD Рік тому +1

      BuT iT's a Museum Battleship. How did they get the armaments and charges so quickly before they sailed out...

  • @siliconwolverine
    @siliconwolverine Рік тому +180

    I remember seeing a pre release cut of this scene wherein at the moment he drops the anchor, one of the old sailors grabbed onto a stanchion and yelled out “it’s the okacroke slide boys! And blackbeards at the helm!” Then the anchor snapped taught. Loved it.

  • @m1abramstankcrew467
    @m1abramstankcrew467 Рік тому +11

    2:50 easily the most humorous line of the whole clip

  • @randomlyentertaining8287
    @randomlyentertaining8287 Рік тому +26

    One of my favorite bit is if you watch really close at 2:58-3:00, you can see they even CGI'd the barrels recoiling back as they're fired. Nice touch.

    • @FP194
      @FP194 2 місяці тому +2

      That’s because the entire ship is CGI

  • @Michael-ez3zg
    @Michael-ez3zg Рік тому +256

    Science Fiction requires the suspension of disbelief. So I don't understand all the hate for this movie. I loved and enjoyed this movie but I guess that's mostly just me... "I Got This!" and "Calm down, okay? I'm gonna frigging save you!"...

    • @yzdatabase4175
      @yzdatabase4175 Рік тому

      movies such as this require an actual lobotomy

    • @Pobrez
      @Pobrez Рік тому +5

      I also love that movie i hope they make more

    • @matthewdudael1931
      @matthewdudael1931 Рік тому +1

      Suspension of "disbelief " ?

    • @martinmtonga5698
      @martinmtonga5698 Рік тому +8

      I enjoyed it too. Some people don't get it. It's a movie n not a documentary.

    • @varza_cu_ciolan
      @varza_cu_ciolan Рік тому +5

      @@matthewdudael1931 "Suspension of disbelief, sometimes called willing suspension of disbelief, is the intentional avoidance of critical thinking or logic in examining something unreal or impossible in reality, such as a work of speculative fiction, in order to believe it for the sake of enjoyment."

  • @ShawnPack
    @ShawnPack Рік тому +38

    2:49 Best line ever. Let's drop some lead...

    • @kidz4p509
      @kidz4p509 Рік тому

      Let’s drop some lead on those mother-
      FIRE!

    • @simplyminipainting
      @simplyminipainting Рік тому +3

      putting warheads on foreheads

    • @chihao8565
      @chihao8565 Рік тому +1

      No it’s Let’s drop some lead on some motherfuckers

  • @michaelriddick7116
    @michaelriddick7116 4 дні тому

    There's something really satisfying about watching those 16" guns fire like that! 😁

  • @returnoftheromans6726
    @returnoftheromans6726 Рік тому +16

    There is something about heavy machinery, especially war machines whirring into action. Gives me chills.

  • @RedDeadRanger
    @RedDeadRanger Рік тому +905

    1:43 the USS Missouri is 270m, and that gap looks slightly less than 2 but we'll call it 550 for simplicity. The alien missiles took approximately 37 seconds to reach the ship, meaning they were moving at around 54kmph, or 29knots, meaning pretty much any modern military ship could easily outpace them.

    • @Progamerguy101
      @Progamerguy101 Рік тому +84

      we don't have battleships commissioned anymore, that was the movie's point of calling that ship a relic.

    • @RedDeadRanger
      @RedDeadRanger Рік тому +39

      @@Progamerguy101 Changed it especially for you mate.

    • @achilles8804
      @achilles8804 Рік тому +136

      The Missouri’s guns also have a range of over 20 miles so them getting within a few hundred meters and in alien tomahawk range is even stupider, they could’ve shelled the aliens from a different area code

    • @Progamerguy101
      @Progamerguy101 Рік тому +3

      @@RedDeadRanger Thanks

    • @Absolut531kmh
      @Absolut531kmh Рік тому +20

      USS Iowa class (modified after cold War) 80s :
      270m (L), 32m (w), 56988tons full load, 16inch main batteries (Mark 7) [9 shells/3turrets/9 barrels], 5 inch secondary guns (Mark 12) [12 shells/6 turrets/12 barrels], bofors machine guns ×2, Sea-Ram AA missile countermeasures ×4, comanche helicopter ×1, 2 slots of swarmer missiles, 30knots.
      IJN Yamato 1945:
      263m (L), 38m (w), 73000 tons full load, 18.1 inch main batteries (type 94 SK model) [9 shells/3 turrets/9 barrels], 6 inch secondary guns [6 shells/2 turrets/6 barrels], 6 inch autocannons [12 shells/6 turrets/12 barrels], 5 inch autocannons/AA [12 shells/6 turrets/12 barrels], 24 AA 5 inch guns [72 shells/24 turrets/72 barrels], type zero fighter planes ×7, 27 knots.

  • @8-random258
    @8-random258 Рік тому +465

    Love how the Veteran said They are never sinking this battleship no way.
    That ship has faced and survive many battles ain't no way its going down by some aliens.

    • @KimJongFunny
      @KimJongFunny Рік тому +17

      Not so much Battles, it was the Last Class of Battleships... so the Action was mostly over.

    • @user-rb2ze1bq7q
      @user-rb2ze1bq7q Рік тому

      전쟁은 전략 전술 많은 무기보다 한방이 중요합니다.
      무너지는건 단한방 전일보처럼 등짝에 손자국없으면 허리반동 사용할수없지여
      손자국은 인간의 의지?!

    • @MarkEmperor
      @MarkEmperor Рік тому +6

      It won’t be going down by aliens….
      ……just not yet.
      PEACE❤️

    • @KimJongFunny
      @KimJongFunny Рік тому +3

      @@MarkEmperor This Aliens are weak.

    • @funveeable
      @funveeable Рік тому +18

      Battleships are built in a way that makes them virtually unsinkable by other battleships. The guns can only shell what is above the water, and during the Bismark vs the Royal Navy, 4 ships hammered the Bismark for hours at point blank and she didn't sink until some torpedoes from a destroyer hit it below the water line.

  • @daakudaddy5453
    @daakudaddy5453 Місяць тому

    Haters gonna hate, but I LOVE this scene! Not ashamed to admit it, it's movies. Watch a documentary if you want real.

  • @BRORANDYMARTIN
    @BRORANDYMARTIN Рік тому +36

    That is a powerful scene I so enjoy watching every once in a while. The questioning of his orders at every turn, like the direction of the guns, the anchor, etc just takes away from the scene so much

  • @user-jpdiwpapapmpdpmw
    @user-jpdiwpapapmpdpmw Рік тому +258

    They ain't going to sink this battleship, no way.
    Yamato「That's right.」
    Musashi「That's right.」
    Bismarck「That's right.」

    • @smythers1981
      @smythers1981 Рік тому +15

      hms hood lol

    • @richardfrench2863
      @richardfrench2863 Рік тому +5

      @@smythers1981
      Hood didn't have armor.

    • @xsupremeyx9923
      @xsupremeyx9923 Рік тому +3

      Add Tirpitz too

    • @sandeeppallapu
      @sandeeppallapu Рік тому +18

      They sunk because of the relentless fire they were subjected to.... Not because they were unsinkable....
      They endured what none of the so called modern ships of today could even dream of .......
      Take Bismarck, that thing was so strong despite relentless fire from basically the whole Royal navy, it refused to sink.
      Only when that destroyer HMS dorsetshire( sorry if i got that name wrong) launched torpedoes, only then did it go down....
      Yamato, went down only because it was overwhelmed by the USAF.... Relentless torpedoing and dive bombing that thing..... Still refused to sink then sunk later.
      Hood on the other side was so unlucky.... Had weak deck armor and only needed a shell from Bismarck to pierce it and detonate the magazine....
      Point is, nothing is too strong or too weak... It's just that fate seems to have a different destiny for all things...

    • @jjsancho2340
      @jjsancho2340 Рік тому +1

      @@sandeeppallapu it was scuttled by its crew of Bismarck... I read an article few years ago that a mechanic from bismarck claimed it was scuttled due to an order to put charges then abandon the ship.
      And i dont know if CV planes are covered by the USAF since those planes were from the CV of the USN

  • @Gokul-ob5hx
    @Gokul-ob5hx Рік тому +122

    2:50 that dialogue give me chills

  • @Splappa09Gaming
    @Splappa09Gaming Рік тому +1

    Watching Mighty Mo drop hot lead on that alien craft was so satisfying. Chef's kiss

  • @gregschmidt4776
    @gregschmidt4776 Рік тому +282

    I think the ending should've had the battleship sailing home with the jet fighters flying around it radioing back to the carrier telling the admiral there is a battleship out here and the admiral standing there in disbelief

    • @cocaine2046
      @cocaine2046 Рік тому +14

      100% should have happened

    • @NicPTheMeme
      @NicPTheMeme Рік тому +28

      Just "There's a battleship out here!! It's Missouri!!"
      Admiral: _???????????????_

    • @guts-141
      @guts-141 Рік тому

      They probably cut the scene out because they can see when the barrier went down

    • @joeflores615
      @joeflores615 Рік тому +6

      No matter how flawed a movie, there are scenes that just stand out. This is one of them. This effectively demonstrated the awesome firepower of a battleship.

    • @alexh3974
      @alexh3974 Рік тому +9

      100% the shock of acting captain Hopper of USS Missouri radioing in permission to join the fleet and sailing as lead ship.

  • @patrickhill7083
    @patrickhill7083 Рік тому +192

    This film is so underrated.
    I love this simple Human vs Alien action.

    • @jtphr33ky
      @jtphr33ky Рік тому +4

      It really could have been something if they nixed the secondary storyline with the hikers and dropped the ties to the board game.... movie has to be paid for somehow I guess...

    • @andrefasching1332
      @andrefasching1332 Рік тому +6

      Problem was that they released it at an very unfortunate time.
      Some Marvel Movie i already forgott, dropped at the same time and everybody just forgot about Battleship

    • @fakhrymuhammad4612
      @fakhrymuhammad4612 Рік тому +6

      @@andrefasching1332 yeah that's actually kinda sad. I watch this movie few times and never bored, since the conflict between human and aliens are pretty simple, and only happen inside a sphere Shield that around 300 km or more

    • @dimitarmargaritov
      @dimitarmargaritov Рік тому

      @@andrefasching1332 I think it was Avengers in 2012.

    • @patrickhill7083
      @patrickhill7083 Рік тому

      @@andrefasching1332 I guess that was "The Avengers". in 2012 when both avengers and battleship released.

  • @Eric_Nguyen.
    @Eric_Nguyen. 10 місяців тому +1

    As unrealistic this movie is, it's still a nice one to watch, especially the old man saying, "They ain't gonna sink this battleship, no way."
    Battleships were built to take punishment but return it back.
    Although obsolete in modern Navies, the legacy of how they've played in the Pacific during WWII is unforgettable.
    Although not a battleship, the most famous ship in WWII I would say be the Aircraft Carrier The Enterprise.
    Although the original was scrapped because of fundings, the name will never be forgotten in the Navy.

  • @Taikutsu_Rii
    @Taikutsu_Rii Рік тому +4

    "I betcha I can drift a 58,000 Tons chunk of pure metal boat with canons, Tokyo style against an outer space alien."
    -Sun Tzu The Art of War

  • @dk832002
    @dk832002 Рік тому +38

    Dudes a legend, who knew you could drif a battleship

  • @3skFq7pSM8tcFfF
    @3skFq7pSM8tcFfF Рік тому +29

    4:37
    And I can't believe it has already been a decade since this movie came out.

  • @timberhead2069
    @timberhead2069 Місяць тому

    Having those veterans in this movie makes it even cooler.

  • @imanoldurango8213
    @imanoldurango8213 Рік тому +5

    For a movie based on a board game, I’d say it’s better than any video game based movie

  • @curtisdaniel9294
    @curtisdaniel9294 Рік тому +46

    A lot of people think this is a dumb movie...perhaps...but I enjoyed it anyway

    • @fakhrymuhammad4612
      @fakhrymuhammad4612 Рік тому +8

      Same man, for me it's because it has good CGI and the story was pretty simple with a lot of action. I also love how it's not just typical "America vs aliens" it's combination from other country too that makes it look better

    • @blank4319
      @blank4319 Рік тому +1

      It's an entertaining movie I gotta say. I even enjoyed it myself. But it's just that. There're moments that are unrealistic and the most notable one for me, as a former sailor, is the one where they use the anchor to "drift" at sea. That's dumb. Even if it's a battle ship, the anchor chain is not immune to intense friction. If that anchor is dropped in that situation, not only would it fail miserably since the anchor chain will burn and snap or the gravity itself pulling the anchor block and decommissioning the entire windlass, there would also be a lot of factors to be considered. Even if by some miracle, the anchor chain didn't snap, is the anchor actually able to secure itself at the sea floor strong enough for the whole heavy battleship to "drift"? Worse case scenario the anchor wouldn't grab anything strong and instead of "drifting", the ship would still go forward and they still get hit by those alien Molotov. I can't blame people for thinking it's dumb even though it's an enjoyable movie.

  • @hiteshparashar
    @hiteshparashar Рік тому +8

    3:59 My contribution in a group project

  • @supachotsangrungruang1401
    @supachotsangrungruang1401 Рік тому +2

    Is movie is 10 years ago but I like it is I watch it again I just like it

  • @Erakius323
    @Erakius323 Рік тому +2

    I really liked this movie, even though it got slated critically. Not every movie needs to be aiming for an oscar.

  • @helpmereach45ksubswithoutvideo
    @helpmereach45ksubswithoutvideo Рік тому +16

    These videos is the thing we need

  • @tarn1135
    @tarn1135 Рік тому +22

    “That’s not what it means.” “Really?” “Not even close.” ---Got to be the best dialogue in this movie.

  • @raidenthenctzenwithinsomni4961

    Say what you will about the movie but there's no denying Steve Jablonsky's score is GOATed.

  • @kintingkam6704
    @kintingkam6704 Рік тому +11

    A retired US Navy Admiral once said "This happens to be one of my favorite movie". Think about it.

    • @gscurd75
      @gscurd75 Рік тому +3

      A retired US Gunnery Chief from one of those ships once said "This is even less believable than Under Siege and I didn't think that was possible."

    • @esther1914
      @esther1914 Рік тому +1

      God is always w US

  • @dennismccunney4462
    @dennismccunney4462 Рік тому +59

    The daring tactic is an old one dating from the says of sail. It's called anchoring on springs, to let you better orient your ship to bring your broadside in best position to engage te enemy, And a fundamental problem for naval gunners is that your ship and your opponent are moving in three dimensions simultaneously,
    In Age of Sail days, you were at the mercy of the gun captain of a cannon being ble to judge the exact moment to actually ire the gun with a hope of hitting the target, And the technique provided a more stable gun platform, dampening some of the possible movement that would throw the gun off target.
    A modern battleship was s floating artillery platform, whose sheer size and displacement offered far more stability that an Ship of the Line in the Age of Sail. And it could shoot much farther. The 16" guns had a possible range of 20 miles in WWII, with improvements in smokeless powder increasing the to 40 miles in later year, But the ship would be firing at targets it couldn't even see over the horizon. There are reasons why the battleship was likely obsolete as a surface combatant when WWII began, and the biggest service battleships performed was fire support for amphibious landings against identified shore installations that could be accurately targeted. Might hae to fire a few rounds to walk the fire into the correct place, but a major blockhouse or shore battery wasn't moving anywhere...

    • @jaredharris1970
      @jaredharris1970 Рік тому +4

      I would think by turning the ship that way your exposing more of the ship making a bigger target for the enemy and easier for them to hit u I would think by positioning bow first and firing bow guns would make your profile smaller and harder to hit if that makes sense

    • @CFMLEAP
      @CFMLEAP Рік тому +5

      @@jaredharris1970 yes it would make you a smaller target but a broadside would absolutely destroy your enemy especially since battleships are designed to absorb a few hits. If you wanted to sink an enemy battleship then you would need a full broadside to do it.

    • @shawnr771
      @shawnr771 Рік тому +1

      Inland from Pointe Du Hoc on DDay.
      Special joint Army Navy Fire Control teams translated calls for fire from the Army system to Navy system.
      The 2nd Ranger battalion and the 116th Infantry were calling for fire from the Battleship Nevada targeting single German tanks.
      The Nevada fired rounds from its gun batteries for 80 continous hours.
      At one point the Captain orderef the ship closer to the beaches because smoke was obscuring the targets on the beach.
      Colonel Rudder of the 2nd Rangers made the remark.
      Today the Rangers love the Navy.

    • @Shizuna560
      @Shizuna560 Рік тому +1

      Bruh didn't some veteran navy just prove that this movement is impossible to do in real live? Go watch "insider"

    • @wargriz8213
      @wargriz8213 Рік тому

      It is impractical to design ships with the fire power they can carry, and have all guns able to fire forward. And the front profile needs to be slim for speed/maneuverability. So a broadside brings the most guns to bear with a turreted design. With ships as large as battleships getting hit is inevitable. So they were designed to take hits and exchange fire. Modern warships tend to have less guns but forward turret mounted I believe.

  • @VideoGamingCinematic
    @VideoGamingCinematic 2 дні тому

    art of war is one of the most strategic gameplan of war

  • @fionawimber1028
    @fionawimber1028 4 місяці тому +10

    3:40 One thing that I need to point out here is that how beautifully the armor of a battleship is illustrated in this scene. Remember earlier in the film what just a handful of those rounds did to the destroyers. Missouri practically shrugs off the hits with only the outer layers of turret 3 being blown off.

    • @hisaddle
      @hisaddle 4 місяці тому

      Yeah the armor of the Iowa class is crazy.

    • @xxnightdriverxx9576
      @xxnightdriverxx9576 3 місяці тому +1

      You have no idea what you are talking about.
      The turret is completely destroyed and clearly blows up from the inside, dislodging the guns.
      The other hits occur on areas of the ship that do NOT CARRY ANY ARMOR.
      Yes that is correct, the areas around the main gun turret, including everything that is hit in this clip, are not armored at all. The plating in this location is only 30mm thin, or just over an inch. That is nothing.
      The main armor belt is 307mm thick, but only covers the waterline. The main armor deck is 150mm thick, but is located one deck lower in the ship, just above the waterline, connecting to the main armor belt.
      Just google "Iowa class armor scheme" and you will see what I mean. With the exception of the gun turret, no armor was hit in this scene.

    • @xxnightdriverxx9576
      @xxnightdriverxx9576 3 місяці тому +1

      ​@@hisaddlethe armor of the Iowa class is rather average. It's not great or "crazy" at all. For the size of the ship and the time it was build, it is actually below average.
      Some comparisons:
      As mentioned in my other comment, the 48.000 ton standard displacement Iowa class had a main armor belt that was 307mm thick inclined at 19 degrees. The deck was 152mm with a 32-38mm bomb deck above it and a 16mm splinter deck.
      The French 37.000 ton Richelieu class had a 327mm belt inclined at 15 degrees plus a 170mm thick main deck plus a 40-50mm thick splinter deck.
      The British 36.000 ton King George V class featured a 375mm thick belt, contoured to the hull (so not completely vertical as often stated), and a 150mm thick main deck plud 32mm weather deck.
      The Italian 40.000 ton Littorio class had a 280+70mm thick belt armor inclined at 15 degrees, and a 150mm thick main armor deck plus 36mm weather deck.
      The German 41.000 ton Bismarck class featured a 320mm thick belt and a 120mm thick main armor deck plus 50mm weather deck.
      The French 26.000 ton Dunkerque class, the first of the modern fast battleships to be build and also by far the smallest one, featured a 225mm thin belt on Dunkerque and a 283mm thick belt on Strasbourg, inclined at 11 degrees, with a 125mm thick main deck and 40mm thick lower deck.
      The famous 69.000 ton Japanese Yamato class had a 410mm thick belt inclined at 20 degrees plus a 200mm thick main armor deck with a 50mm thick weather deck.
      It is important to remember that the Iowa class came a couple of years after all of the ships mentioned above, with none of the treaty restrictions, and with the exception of Yamato, the Iowa's were also far bigger and heavier than all of them.
      So yeah, pretty average across the board. And that includes the area/volume protected by armor, which was also pretty average.
      Now don't understand me wrong, the Iowa's were excellent battleship designs. And overall, they were THE BEST designs of the war, no questions there. But being the best overall does not mean they were the best in every single category, which is something many people tend to forget. And protection (armor and torpedo protection) was something that was not meaningfully improved in the Iowa's compared to the previous South Dakota and North Carolina classes, which were 12.000 tons lighter than the Iowa's (25% lighter).

    • @fionawimber1028
      @fionawimber1028 3 місяці тому

      @@xxnightdriverxx9576 and you clearly don’t pay enough attention!
      When the shells hit, their explosions snapped off the three barrels and partially crumpled the barrette but nothing below the deck was damaged. Whereas with the destroyers earlier, just two shells caused a hull breech in Samson and a few more destroyed the JMSDF ship.

    • @xxnightdriverxx9576
      @xxnightdriverxx9576 3 місяці тому

      @@fionawimber1028 you are right that there wasn't a hull breach, but we literally see the turret explode from the inside, leaving behind a burning mess in follow up scenes. The entire turret blew up. The explosion also logically traveled down into the barbette, though it is clear that it was stopped somewhere before reaching the magazines.
      When one of the Iowa's suffered an explosion inside her number 2 turret during I think the Vietnam war, 70 people died. This here looks like a similar explosion.

  • @jocymarhummeldasilva8642
    @jocymarhummeldasilva8642 Рік тому +64

    Assistiria mais 10 vezes! Fantástica essa cena!

  • @andrefasching1332
    @andrefasching1332 Рік тому +43

    Im a (not yet) naval engineer coming from a landlocked country (Austria)
    Seeing the Iowa for the first time gave me the same chills these guys must have had after seeing that alien thing unfold its weapons.

    • @Sturmta
      @Sturmta 11 місяців тому

      @Notmuchnoob it's an iowa-class, still technically true

  • @mikeprovost
    @mikeprovost Місяць тому

    This movie really is one of those "guilty pleasure" movies.

  • @laurabogue3503
    @laurabogue3503 10 місяців тому +4

    Those ships were meant to slug it out and who ever was able to put enough steel on target won. Plain and simple. During world war II they were the Titans of the sea. Everybody wanted one yet only a few could afford it. They were expensive and bulky and really hard to upgrade. But, they also were robust and extremely versatile. I got to see one up close while it was active as a kid. They were amazing machines who the crew absolutely loved.

    • @Snowwie88
      @Snowwie88 8 місяців тому

      And let's not forget this same vessel actually SERVED in 1991 during the invasion of Iraq, in Desert Storm. It even fired it's mains guns at some Iraqi Bunkers and artillery positions.

  • @sa1lor_jarry139
    @sa1lor_jarry139 Рік тому +11

    I'm amazed his ears aren't bleeding after being topside during a full broadside with no hearing protection.

    • @fakhrymuhammad4612
      @fakhrymuhammad4612 Рік тому +1

      Well it's actually possible, since during World War a lot of Navy works on the deck even though those big cannon are shooting other ship

  • @mikiwiz8436
    @mikiwiz8436 Рік тому +8

    I am AIRFORCE but this film makes me love the NAVY. WHAT A FILM

    • @dimitarmargaritov
      @dimitarmargaritov Рік тому +1

      Not American, but why do you say it like that, is there some sort of conflict so to speak between the branches?

  • @robertwall1419
    @robertwall1419 9 місяців тому +24

    I saw this movie when it first came out (ALL the critics HATED it,so I decided to see it )I wasn’t expecting much,so I was pleasantly surprised to absolutely love this movie! The ONLY beef I have with it is that there is NO WAY IN H€££ that those pegs could take out that turret that easily!They were DESIGNED to take hits just as powerful as those pegs and keep on firing!😎😎😎

    • @masterdynamo6457
      @masterdynamo6457 9 місяців тому +1

      Utter American exceptionalism. Several of the hits the Mo took in this movie would have sunk her or disabled her.

    • @robertwall1419
      @robertwall1419 9 місяців тому +8

      @@masterdynamo6457 Utter American Hater. All of the world’s top of the line battleships were designed to take direct hits from most of the main batteries on the current ships of the line (the Yamato Class being the sole exception because nobody knew what caliber the main guns were) .Now they could shoot up the upper superstructure badly,but during the kamikaze attacks, they only suffered a slight dent. Plus when they found the Bismarck, She Wasn’t as shot up as the British said. All evidence points to her being scuttled to keep Her from being captured!

    • @wardfiction5693
      @wardfiction5693 8 місяців тому

      Most of the firepower from the pegs would have been reflected off the hard armored hull of the ship, making that massive explosion.@@masterdynamo6457

    • @tarrantwolf
      @tarrantwolf 5 місяців тому

      ​@robertwall1419 I've never heard she was scuttled with the entire crew still on board. From everything I've seen on it they think a round managed to hit a powder mag after her rudder locked up.

    • @tarrantwolf
      @tarrantwolf 5 місяців тому +1

      @@robertwall1419 man, I'd have loved to have seen a video of mustache man if he found out his priced Bismarck had been captured. But even a video of him hearing it was scuttled would have been great.

  • @Junaidkhan-nd7zx
    @Junaidkhan-nd7zx 4 місяці тому +2

    I just cant get over the battleship drifting logic, but the scene is good😂

  • @spectrickx1678
    @spectrickx1678 Рік тому +9

    These behemoths of the past are priceless relics.

  • @Mike91337
    @Mike91337 Рік тому +9

    Wasn't in here but when he says "I need to borrow your boat" that gets me every time.

    • @howardsmith9342
      @howardsmith9342 Рік тому

      No Navy guy would ever say that. Submarines are boats, battleships are ships.

    • @Mike91337
      @Mike91337 Рік тому

      @@howardsmith9342 I was army anyway. Go give some marines a ride.

    • @howardsmith9342
      @howardsmith9342 Рік тому

      @@Mike91337 LOL. I managed to not get drafted at the end of Vietnam. Never been in the military, but I do read a lot.

  • @marcyweisinger1537
    @marcyweisinger1537 Рік тому +4

    Don't know if people knows this but they actually used the real uss Missouri battleship. Which that is so awesome. But this is my favorite movie ever.

  • @Ani_Hub2k04
    @Ani_Hub2k04 9 місяців тому +2

    Every ships needs a captain like Hopper.

  • @caseypleasant1922
    @caseypleasant1922 Рік тому +14

    The sheer audacity and ridiculousness of this movie made me love it!!!

  • @agenttxgaming4409
    @agenttxgaming4409 Рік тому +11

    I wish I could reload that fast in World of Warships... All jokes aside, amazing movie I wish they would make another one.

  • @leonthompson3433
    @leonthompson3433 Рік тому +3

    This film does have it faults, and there are quite a few. But to honest, I really enjoyed it, thought it was really good fun as popcorn films should be:-)

    • @mikldude9376
      @mikldude9376 Рік тому +1

      Indeed , people do forget this is escapism and not reality , I liked it , it was a fun movie imo .

  • @jawedkhan1984
    @jawedkhan1984 8 місяців тому +6

    Every time I see this battle. Left awesome that no matter how better technology or AI becomes. A human mind still best at its peak.

  • @lotokend9171
    @lotokend9171 Рік тому +52

    That slide always gives me chills and brings a smile to my face

  • @justrob4586
    @justrob4586 Рік тому +7

    Fighting aliens is far more believable than that anchor actually sticking and turning a battleship on a dime 🤣😂… I still like the movie though lol

  • @jenniferkirby6567
    @jenniferkirby6567 3 місяці тому

    As silly as the premise was, Battleship was a good movie. I watch it any time it's on.

  • @robertosanudo2474
    @robertosanudo2474 Рік тому +1

    Una gran película espectacular saludos cordiales desde Mexicali Baja California México 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • @visiblefrequency7005
    @visiblefrequency7005 Місяць тому

    Underrated movie and the old guys were real WW2 vets along with Iraq and Afghanistan vets.

  • @achilles8804
    @achilles8804 Рік тому +43

    The biggest suspension of disbelief in this movie isn’t anything to do with the aliens but that this scene even exists despite that the main guns of an Iowa class battleship like this could’ve shelled the aliens from over 20 miles away

    • @Taospark
      @Taospark Рік тому +7

      That's also true of basically every space battle ever since any kind of remotely laser-like weapon could engage from 200,000 miles away.

    • @benyseus6325
      @benyseus6325 Рік тому +2

      They can’t shell the aliens from 20 miles away cuz they were trapped by the force field

    • @achilles8804
      @achilles8804 Рік тому +10

      @@benyseus6325 20miles is the range of the guns not how far I’m saying they should be, inferences are important
      Also if you think a forcefield that can be seen from space and encompassed Hawaii wasn’t bigger than 20 miles I got some bad news for you

    • @alexanderkarl1344
      @alexanderkarl1344 Рік тому +5

      @@achilles8804 Didn't they say that due to the aliens mobility their best chance of hitting them was to get as close to them as they could?

    • @MasterOfTruck
      @MasterOfTruck Рік тому +8

      @@achilles8804 the reason why they didnt was because they had a limited ammunition supply and couldnt afford to waste it. yes a battleships main gun has a range of 20 miles but that doesnt mean it can accurately _hit_ a target at 20 miles. on average with an experienced gunner, a battleships main gun was only around 32% accurate at _nine_ miles.

  • @NoCH34TER
    @NoCH34TER Рік тому +19

    I hope they‘ll release a sequel one time

  • @joelreis5366
    @joelreis5366 8 місяців тому +2

    This movie is dumb af, but i freaking love it. The Missouri is such a beautiful ship.

  • @user-vc5cm5jk2b
    @user-vc5cm5jk2b Місяць тому

    These Iowa Battleships are such magnificent and graceful machines that pack a better punch than smashing

  • @rask624
    @rask624 Рік тому +6

    2:44 i still remember i was screaming so loud seeing this scene

  • @johngunderson6168
    @johngunderson6168 Рік тому +54

    Love this movie, especially when they take the battleship over to attack the alien ship. The music just pumped me up watching the movie

    • @funveeable
      @funveeable Рік тому +1

      Funny thing about Navy battles in the modern era, they end very quickly and actually have a hard time being draw out for more action. Battleships had to shell each other for hours to get a kill because their guns damage what's above the waterline rather than below it.

    • @minsapint8007
      @minsapint8007 11 місяців тому

      @@funveeable Except for the Hood

  • @rolytnz
    @rolytnz 3 місяці тому +1

    This movie get a lot of stick But it was a fun romp with some cool sequences and some well done ideas. Will watch again. And they used *actual* Navy vets? Too cool.

  • @disappointed6859
    @disappointed6859 9 днів тому

    I love war documentaries.

  • @Sjrick
    @Sjrick Рік тому +4

    I just watched this recently. Such a great scene. Ac/Dc really added to it.

  • @shapesandcolors2826
    @shapesandcolors2826 Рік тому +5

    This movie was the most realistic war movie ever. It's the equivalent of a P-51 Mustang defeating an F-22 Raptor.

  • @billy_chad
    @billy_chad Рік тому +1

    "Let's drop some lead on those mother-" "FIRE" love it😆

  • @spaghettisaucer8870
    @spaghettisaucer8870 Рік тому +26

    When I got the movie ended and my wife told me what did we just waste our money on. Goosebumps

  • @star69thatish
    @star69thatish Рік тому +5

    He drifting a battle ship.... Paul walker would be proud

  • @TheArchemman
    @TheArchemman Рік тому +36

    I love this part. Never get tired of watching Mighty Mo fire her guns.
    Although there is one thing I don't get. Why doesn't he understand Art of War!
    His in the Military, you would think that's day 1 lecture!!!

    • @rishi2791
      @rishi2791 Рік тому +9

      That's the reason he forgot it. Too many lectures after day 1.

    • @patrickkenyon2326
      @patrickkenyon2326 Рік тому +2

      Sun Tzu is required reading at the academies.

    • @thepsychicspoon5984
      @thepsychicspoon5984 Рік тому

      As an enlisted you dont get that stuff, but he is an officer. That is required reading for them.

    • @christopherarthur9577
      @christopherarthur9577 Рік тому +2

      Never studied. Too busy planning the next chicken burrito heist.

  • @BlackTemplar679
    @BlackTemplar679 Рік тому +1

    “Let’s drop some led on those mother-FIRE” is my favorite line

  • @AhmadmuhammadAhmadmuhamm-el3yd
    @AhmadmuhammadAhmadmuhamm-el3yd 11 місяців тому

    Best woo...ini movie msa thun baru...ah hon dtg bantu..masa ni sy tonton ah hon sampai.dye tnya mcn ne kerja..sy ckp.masa ni sy separuh mati ke hulu hilir suport palong meman btl2

  • @thefluffyshark5202
    @thefluffyshark5202 Рік тому +35

    Im suprised Aliens with spacefaring capabilities hasn't figured out missiles and yet uses advanced computers to predict where their unguided stick grenade looking things are gonna land.

    • @dangeary2134
      @dangeary2134 Рік тому +3

      We use smart bombs and cruise middles, but we also still use mortars and RPGs!
      Would aliens be so much different than us?
      Really?

    • @cracklinjack___9466
      @cracklinjack___9466 Рік тому +5

      I'm betting they figured out toilet paper extremely quick after this.

    • @dtvjho
      @dtvjho Рік тому +7

      The alien weapons were deliberately chosen to look like the pegs in the board game.

    • @silentwraith9674
      @silentwraith9674 Рік тому +2

      These guys were a scouting team at best, probably some kind of research team to see if the planet is habitable.

    • @Fizban712
      @Fizban712 Рік тому +5

      @@silentwraith9674 There's actually a theory that the aliens are just a mining team, which is why their "munitions" hit and sink in before exploding.

  • @thadofalltrades
    @thadofalltrades Рік тому +4

    This movie gave me Independence Day vibes. It's just a fun movie.

    • @andrefasching1332
      @andrefasching1332 Рік тому +1

      absolutely same. It just radiates this "We will NOT surrender" feeling.

  • @mycroft16
    @mycroft16 2 місяці тому

    For all it's problems and idiocy, this is just a fun movie. You just have to let go of any sort of realistic ideas. And this scene, more than makes up for it. Getting to see the Missouri be badass again, and using a bunch of the original crew members... that's awesome.

  • @fracturedraptor7846
    @fracturedraptor7846 2 місяці тому +1

    If you can suspend your belief this scene is amazing. If you focus too much on physics you know just how wrong it is. Ships of any size simply can't have the anchor go taught like that and not sustain severe damage, not unless they were specifically designed for it and reinforced to brunt the immense amount of stress that would place on the ship and the anchor itself. Which I think is impossible but I could be wrong. The other point of contention is the decision to get up close. Those guns have a severe amount of range on them, the kind of range that would have made the alien's method of attack wholly moot. Those charges are launched short distances. Those guns can be effective for miles and miles. The ship would have won without breaking a sweat.

  • @Sahilprakash1999
    @Sahilprakash1999 Рік тому +55

    USS Missouri is one of the most strongest Iowa Class Battleship in the history of the United States Navy

    • @jason9035
      @jason9035 Рік тому +3

      Yep, her and big J , the New Jersey.

    • @waldeauxgrover5946
      @waldeauxgrover5946 Рік тому +2

      America's Navy needs 12 of this class battleship with all the modern warfare upgrades. OH, YEAH!!!

    • @artermis2294
      @artermis2294 Рік тому +1

      🗿

    • @Sahilprakash1999
      @Sahilprakash1999 Рік тому +1

      @@jason9035 I know USS New Jersey she's one of the most greatest toughest strongest and the most mightiest Iowa Class Battleship in the history of the United States Navy World War 2, Korean War, Vietnam War, Lebanon War, and the Persian Gulf her battle won by rewarding 19 battle stars as a true American Warship in the world

    • @Turican76
      @Turican76 Рік тому

      USA is a terror state