@@comradecetacean1927 it was to let the Russian ship in front of them know, that they meant no harm, they are friendly and have president on board, if they wouldn't have surfaced, that ship would have lightened it up with grenade launchers and torpedoes. Already before reaching this point, sub had taken a lot of damage.
@@comradecetacean1927yes but u are right best think would have been they could have just dived inside water, when they got track of missile being launched from land launch vehicles, instead of taking more damage, and asking the Russian ship to provide cover. 😂 That's Hollywood
I know it’s a film but I’ve always thought that if humans had this kind of faith in each other rather than suspicion and deception, we could build such a beautiful world together
Not going to happen, because every country has advantages and disadvantages of resources, to fill the shortage of nature resource every country need to pay to other country, some countries think how can we have those resources without having to pay again? Or how about raising the price? Fighting over certain resources, Anything to make my country more prosperous than other countries, although war can be avoided, suspicion, envy, cheating between countries Will always exist.
"No, they'll be firing on you" I didn't get this line at first. And it seems to come off as an insult. After rewatching this scene it totally make sense. Love how it demonstrate loyalty to their president
@@ediman2000"On you" in this context is shorthand for "on your command/order/signal," albeit used as a metaphor. Haven't watched the movie, but based on the synopsis, it seemed that the crew of the Yevchenko still had loyalties to their old captain (Andropov, who was inside the submarine with the President) and chose to go against the new captain, who was a member of Durov's conspiracy.
@@ahrithegumiho2199 actually that SOB had no idea that his Trump card was about to go boom. He had about as much warning as the people on the dark side of Alderaan.
Hollywood stereotypes about Russians are very funny, we in Russia always laugh at this. I thought that now the fighting bears would appear and throw balalaika at the submarine! 😂
Correct bro. I guess... they have understood they can win only in Hollywood movie...due to this they are creating this type of movie again again.. Bro let them feel happy by watching this type of shit. We know in reality it is far opposite.
The crew in that other ship knew what would happen if the sub had fired on them just as they knew what it would Plunge Russia into No one wants Nuke war but sadly I don't think its going to be able to be Avoided in the future humans are retards
Actually, The only land based Anti Ship missiles in active russian military service are Ramjet powered (most likely this one bing the K-300 series.) So they will burn Liquid Kerosene.
@@yamabushi170 The mistake is not that it is wrong. The mistake is that considering the necessary brevity of communication, during the firing sequence, this is non-pertinent information and would not have been stated.
Quite rare to see war movies of this quality lately not to miss this Hunter killer Commandos, submarines, coup d'etat, many well-received situations make this film an excellent surprise. The casting does the job, the scenario spares the suspense and the fight scenes are rather realistic. Everything is not perfect but let's not sulk our pleasure.
Honestly thats so fucking cringe to hear background speaking basic russian words/phares, and the First Officer speaking english in thick russian accent. Like they cant get it more realistic to get actors who know how to speak russian or those who are willingly to learn russia for the role, isnt that like what actors do?
really, its been long time since watched this one but remembered they had these cringe moment here and there or was it just this clip what make it feel like it.
It is also worth mentioning that submarines do not launch missiles from the surface, this threatens to damage the skin. The launch is carried out from a certain depth of 50-100 meters, a large amount of gas is supplied to the cell containing the rocket and, due to the high pressure, the rocket flies out at high speed, flies out from under the water and flies up to a height of 40-50 meters, after which the engines will turn on. It is possible to launch from the surface position only from a certain type of submarine, and for this they are tipped a little on their side so that the rocket after departure does not damage the skin with a jet stream. Another silly point - the Russians used anti-ship missiles. Submarines are destroyed with the help of helicopters, which, thanks to special devices, find submarines and launch torpedoes or with the help of special ships. The missiles fired by the Russians are capable of destroying a ship, but not a submarine. And the last point - rockets don't explode like that. If they are conventional-fuel rockets, they will catch fire, explode slightly due to the ignition of the fuel, and fall into the water. There is also another type of rockets that fly due to their aerodynamics rather than fuel, and are more difficult to shoot down. Missiles do not explode instantly and completely, this is impossible.
Also, no CIWS system made by anyone is stopping that many missiles in that span of time. And why would you build a base without any form of air defense?
Huge plot hole: If the Yevchenko's CADS could neutralise 6 incoming missile travelling at full speed, it could even more easily blow two slow-launching Tomahawks right out of the sky. So the sub was absolutely no threat at all and the bluff just didn't exist.
It wasn't just about the nukes. The simple possibility that they actually could've pulled the trigger was the threat, because that would've kicked off World War III.
The crew of the Ыевченко we're aware that the Kapitan and the Federation President are onboard the Arkansas! And they saw Durov launch the S-500's from Polarney,there was only one choice to be made to divert total nuclear exchange!
According to the tactical principle, never arrange 2 rocket launchers close to each other and the radar vehicles are also located very far away, the director did not learn anything about the military.
@@nadaramadhan3377 the thrust of the rockets will set each other off course for one. These are not mlrs, these are asbm . Also possiblity of collision. Also radars will get mass distortion at this close proximity from signal overlap and rift in the air from so many simultaneous launches.
Thế ông mong đợi gì ở bọn holyweed? :)) Tướng Nga luôn trong hình ảnh già, quân phục không chỉnh tề, dáng đi béo bự hoặc gà rù. Mỹ luôn trong trang phục thẳng thớm với bộ ngực nở rộng :)))))
When those missiles are about to hit the Russian President containing American submarine and the nearby Russian ship machine gun just whittles them out, is one of the most dramatically intense action scenes ever! This movie is seriously an underrated gem!
@@Vardhan_Mantri bro, there is no perspective change, same location inside the sub. Also it was a joke, congratulations for not having a sense of humor.
This is just an action movie but it has a deep meaningful story within. It tells of how in the end militaries all over the world have the same duty to defend not to wage war but all it takes is just a group of small people to bring nations to war with one another....an that is how it has always happened, sadly!!
The closer the rockets get to the CIWS, the more efficient they are given the proximity factor. That close to the sub, the bullets from the CIWS create a barrier, which is what the rockets detonate against as if they had struck the sub itself.
If you want some realistic aspect then you should enlist , it's a movie for entertainment purposed not a history channel that goes to detail about how shit works ..
@@khordad1216 it's not even a woosh because it's true if they accidentally pressed the first triggered there's still a switch to activate it first before pressing the main to launch.
One thing about this that is accurate, Russian ships tend to have a lot more offensive firepower than ours. We rely on our carriers for offense, the other ships are there almost entirely to defend a carrier. A lot of them don't have any direct attack missiles anymore.
@@Suojeluninja Soviet design their ship for massive saturation attack and they would be fighting close to their naval base so it doesn't matter. US destroyers were designed to operate far from their base and be a multirole so.
@@kashmirha Flip flops and a constant supply of Stinger missiles, CIA instructors and back door weapons from Pakistan and elsewhere. The US has taken far less casualties and have been there longer. More than twice as long as the Soviets, yet they withdraw in such a humiliating fashion? Somethings not right if you ask me.
People always forget that the USA did not "lose" the Vietnam war. What was 'lost' was the support of the American taxpayers who didn't want the war to continue. Without proper supplies and financing, no country in the world can accomplish winning a war and it has nada to do with skill or ability. It's like if someone handed you a gun with no bullets and said to kill someone. What would you say? "With what? Hitting them over the head with the empty gun with no bullets?"
@@user-tb2jy9lu3d what about Afghanistan, 2.25 trillion dollars and still of us army somehow managed to lose. Any explanation for this? 2.25 trillion dollar is enough to end world food hunger
@@julianthursky-moore2438 looks like trash especially the building blowing up painfully obvious CGI.. some AAA games these days look more realistic than movies...
This film gets it's fair share of critique but it's nice to see an illustration of modern naval weaponry. These hyper speed defensive gattling guns are absolutely real and designed specifically to shoot down incoming armament. But shooting across like it does as depicted would be harder than straight on.
@@nitonono4143 The system is not fully integrated with a central battle management system which alerts the ciws systems to ready themselves like it's being done with the western phalanx ciws. in the case of the castan it is being operated one individual who manually handles the system and only when gives the ok to the castan system it starts to fire. In the case of the Moskva it was ambushed so good that they didn't have the time. to react... In my country Greece we have a laughable saying but serious if anyone knows its meaning:Silk shorts also require skillful asses. Which means if you have the tool you need also a skilled person to handle it.. I really doubt if the Russian navy has ever make drills for such scenarios... In my country we do... The same think can also happen to west ships if their being targeted with hypersonic missiles or supercavitation torpedoes.
No one gonna talk about them saying they are firing from "russian soil", when on 1:53 on the map it shows them atleast 400km away from the russian border. Thats some fast rockets or the russians annexed norway without anyone noticing.
@@BigBoss-rr4sw That still doesn't change the fact that launching missiles from Russian soil towards Norway would take more than a few seconds... They get shot down by the magic CIWS system on the ship, which then launches two missiles of its own to 'Russian soil', again some 400KM away... The movie depicts it as if they are at ~1500 meters distance, the director and editor don't even know where Norway and Russia are on a map...
They always fire them in volleys A few go high and guide the others and if they get intercepted the low flying ones take their place That way at least one or two make it These systems are designed to hit carriers so it makes sense with all the f18s and cwis around in such a scenario
@@allent.g560 while it does seem odd at first glance, it's not entirely without merit. Many modern anti-ship missiles(such as the US's Harpoon are infact multi-purpose. They can either break apart to reveal the torpedo to attack a submarine, or remain intact and strike a surface ship. Im not entirely sure if Russia has a similar multi-purpose missile. But hey, its Hollywood, since when do they ever get anything historically accurate
This clip from Hunter Killer is packed with tension! ⚓ The strategic moves and high-stakes decisions really keep you on the edge of your seat. The cinematography and action sequences are impressive! Gerard Butler and the cast bring such intensity to this underwater thriller!!!
@@hprgaming9249 why are you getting so riled up!? I am not saying that this movie is bad or you shouldn't watch it, why are you trying to pick a fight? A lot of comments are saying the same thing, are you going reply to everyone of them!? If you are having a bad day then don't bother others... Move on!!
любому человеку у которого голова не только для того чтобы в неё кушать , прекрасно понимает что данный фильм это отборная хуйня. Лютая клюква с примесью дичайшией фантазии
I thought this was a fun movie, I know there's technicalities a lot of stuff that wouldn't actually happen. That's why it's a work of fiction! But they did a good job making it believable to Everyday viewers! And I like that it had a peaceful ending between the Nations, if only real life was so.
MCmaddawg -- On subs in reality, the sorts of missiles that have nuclear warheads, require two commanding officers to approve the launch together, both independent of one another. The scene isn't too bad, because Butler's character to accede on his own terms, just as the officer holding the trigger did. Though in reality I doubt it would get so far as one them holding the trigger.
@@7777777fresh if american have ciws why not russian have it. Its like the us destroyer that have phalanx ciws, in russian ship they use AK-630 or Kortik 30MM
Some western submarine sunk the Russian submarine kursk , that time Russia was a wick and Putin in front of people Putin given promise he will change a Russian ships .
@@нацияинтернационал Except the publicly available results of the investigation into why she sank revealed that there was a fuel leak in one of the torpedos. When the crew went to fire the training torpedoes at the battlecruiser in the exercise the spark used to turn on the torpedo ignited the leaking fuel. The resulting blast traveled through the forward torpedo room, through the open hatch into the bridge killing the command crew. That hatch was supposed to be closed as the boat was meant to be at alert. The remaining crew were forced to try and escape, it was noted in the investigation that in some compartments the blast had knocked oxygen producing tiles off the walls which upon touching water on the deck caught fire. The tiles converted CO2 to oxygen but produced a lot of heat, it wound up performing the same reaction on the water and the resulting heat made the tiles catch fire. The only good thing about the accident was that the reactor technician followed his training and scrammed the reactor, sealing himself in with it.
1:37 Old man yelling "fire" has a rank on his shoulderboard with a star and above that, a wreath with a small star in that. I did the research and its a General of the Army.
There are a few mistakes here. One, submarines are difficult to fire missiles while floating, the surface of the submarine is able to withstand water pressure and cold temperatures but not the high heat from the rocket engine. Two, Tomahawk cruise missiles are not used to intercept other flying targets. Third, the Russian destroyer does not have that type of missile launcher, it uses small circular launchers on a large circle.
The submarine was forced to emerge before that scene, else they would have been destroyed. They kind of gave up and made clear, that they are not the enemy but that they got that old captain on board (who had trained most of the Russian sailors on the warship) and the Russian president - who also made clear that any attack on the US submarine would be seen as high treason. The only question was, if the Russian warship would believe that AND not be on the side of the general who had planed this whole thing to take over. Well, they were not, so they not only didn't follow the order to destroy the US submarine, but defended it against the attack ordered by the general (and yes, of course the CIWS scene was made for tension, they would have fired anti air missiles and shoot at the incoming missiles much earlier). The Tomahawks were an order of the US defense minister, to take out the Russian command center with the general, but the captain of the submarine of course saw this as an insane risk to start WW3. The Tomahawks were not meant to defend them against the incoming missiles (in that case it would be just stupid to wait). He didn't fire to make clear, that they are not the aggressor.
@@reaperch.2476 both Kortik and Kashatan have missile and non-missile variants. Thing is that "Kashtan" was initially export name for the system but now "Kashatan-M" is also used for mounts placed on russian ships too. "Kortik" now is just an old name.
@@briellabounce the AO-18K autocannons are part of the Kashtan CIWS, it mounts 2 of them. These however may actually be the AO-18KD, and this could be a Pantsir-M (the incoming replacement for the Kashtan, basically a direct upgrade in all regards). Its hard to tell from that angle as both systems have a similar profile and I can't recall which year this film is based in.
@@cgi2002 its not Pantsir-M or 3M87 (Kortik/kashtan), its 3M89 (Phalash/Palma). AO-18K also functions differently from regular GSh-6-30 due addition of cooling system and electric motor
@@Nothing_._Here seems you right, its profile does match the 3M89 which means its using A0-18KD's. There is surprisingly little info around about the 3M89, other than that it's basically the light weight version of the Kashtan with the upgraded gun from the Pantsir-M. Have to admit it's a nice piece of hardware and still follows the same design logic of "more dakka".
I am Russian, I am a patriot... I think the same as you, patriots of your countries. Believe me, none of the normal people want war... It's all politics and political games. And for the most part, we're all the same. God forbid that there was no war. God is with us!!!
@@lorensrewolle3860 and nothing went through the hull n out the otherside. We are talking supersonic here. Not a granade schrapnel. That boat should have been hit n hit bad like a few dead ppl inside the hull
yeah. Except for a few things. Artillery guns turning on a dime to snipe missiles. 2 tomahawks ready to shoot down 8 missiles S-300 Anti-air missiles used as ballistic missiles (well, that one, as it seems, is actually possible)
And it is impossible for CIWS system to destroy as many missiles at the same spot especially when they fire ~perpendicularly to their flight path. Every process takes some time, even impact on warhead and its explosion and with the speed of those missiles some would explode when hitting the sub. Besides - hitting missile cannot guarantee setting off its warhead - it is known issue of the CIWS system design - missile has to be successfully intercepted at some distance from the ship, otherwise it may suffer great damage from the near explosion; or if the missile is just destroyed in terms of its controlled flight, its inertia and crash course may still keep it on collision course with the ship - in that case, there would be no difference between intercepted and non-intercepted missile (unless by some luck, detonating system were disabled).
Я хочу сказать что только вместе можно иметь безопасности и красивое небо над головой.... война не когда не хорошо,мы не дикие животные чтобы друг друга порвать и ховастаться....
Inside the sub: no shock wave and the sub didn't shake.
Outside the sub: several explosions that can blow your eardrums 50 times.
A
Haha cwis go brrrrrrrrrrrrr
I don't get why the sub surfaced in the first place! Subs can fire missiles while being submerged.
@@comradecetacean1927 it was to let the Russian ship in front of them know, that they meant no harm, they are friendly and have president on board, if they wouldn't have surfaced, that ship would have lightened it up with grenade launchers and torpedoes. Already before reaching this point, sub had taken a lot of damage.
@@comradecetacean1927yes but u are right best think would have been they could have just dived inside water, when they got track of missile being launched from land launch vehicles, instead of taking more damage, and asking the Russian ship to provide cover. 😂 That's Hollywood
2:32 that scene is the purest gold of all gold; sound design, CGI, and every thing else.
You call this good cgi
🤣🤣🤣
@@martineriksson8445uhh okay buddy whatever you say
@@martineriksson8445 Ok show us something better than this
Unwavering Unflinching Unparalleled Designed
I don't care how realistic this is but when I first saw those guns create a wall of protective bullets, I was blown away. Fucking beautiful.
The sub would have been blown away too.
I mean, CWIS does sort of do that.
@@Zantidessame for a russian sub. Would’ve been blown away.
Russians have CIWS? @@PeterJavi
CIWS@@PeterJavi
I know it’s a film but I’ve always thought that if humans had this kind of faith in each other rather than suspicion and deception, we could build such a beautiful world together
Not in our nature
Not going to happen, because every country has advantages and disadvantages of resources, to fill the shortage of nature resource every country need to pay to other country, some countries think how can we have those resources without having to pay again? Or how about raising the price? Fighting over certain resources, Anything to make my country more prosperous than other countries, although war can be avoided, suspicion, envy, cheating between countries Will always exist.
doesnt work like that
@@fillah4910 it’s not even that it’s just comes down to jealously and greed. Throughout human Existence that’s all we done. Fight and take
@@JoseHernandez-dq1cz yes greed
"No, they'll be firing on you" I didn't get this line at first. And it seems to come off as an insult. After rewatching this scene it totally make sense. Love how it demonstrate loyalty to their president
I have watched the movie more than 5 times just because I loved it so much, and now I finally get it. thank you
I still dont get it, can you explain it for me, please?
they are trying to kill the president so the coup could work@@ediman2000
@@ediman2000"On you" in this context is shorthand for "on your command/order/signal," albeit used as a metaphor.
Haven't watched the movie, but based on the synopsis, it seemed that the crew of the Yevchenko still had loyalties to their old captain (Andropov, who was inside the submarine with the President) and chose to go against the new captain, who was a member of Durov's conspiracy.
@@ediman2000 The traitor general does not care about the US submarine, he wants to kill the Russian president.
3:44 I just love Durov's shocked and surprised look on his face, knowing that "it's over"
what's the tittle plzz
That man expression reminds me to Admiral Tarkin from star wars... before death star 1 blew up
@@ahrithegumiho2199 actually that SOB had no idea that his Trump card was about to go boom. He had about as much warning as the people on the dark side of Alderaan.
@@BrowncoatGofAZThis^ Tarkin was overconfident and arrogant. Which is exactly what lead to his own demise.
For the next 2 days, all output from the sub's reactors went to the laundry machines.
reporting for skivvie duty
Supply some ammunition.
I'm sure the sub had a peculiar odor to it after that.
@@munk_ken probably have a metallic taste in mouth too
You can feel the power in your linen
Hollywood stereotypes about Russians are very funny, we in Russia always laugh at this. I thought that now the fighting bears would appear and throw balalaika at the submarine! 😂
@@mcbure1 Thank you for your reaction! 👍:)
that is reserved for the sequel ;-)
Correct bro.
I guess... they have understood they can win only in Hollywood movie...due to this they are creating this type of movie again again..
Bro let them feel happy by watching this type of shit.
We know in reality it is far opposite.
🤣🤣🤣👍👍👍 greetings from the Crimea!
The crew in that other ship knew what would happen if the sub had fired on them just as they knew what it would Plunge Russia into No one wants Nuke war but sadly I don't think its going to be able to be Avoided in the future humans are retards
"Missiles are fueled and ready sir"
"FAIYE!"
lol
"missiles are fueled and ready sir"
> shoots missiles that are very clearly solid fuel
Actually, The only land based Anti Ship missiles in active russian military service are Ramjet powered (most likely this one bing the K-300 series.) So they will burn Liquid Kerosene.
Technically he's not wrong. The missiles are fuelled
@@yamabushi170 That type of missile is always fueled.
@@BenjaminPitkin Yes I know. So technically he's correct when he says the missiles are fuelled :)
@@yamabushi170 The mistake is not that it is wrong. The mistake is that considering the necessary brevity of communication, during the firing sequence, this is non-pertinent information and would not have been stated.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein.
If Einstein saw human stupidity in its modern form, he would've run away screaming.
@@TheAngelOfDeath01 Which is the reason why god made him born in the 20th century instead
@@TheAngelOfDeath01 That's why 'some' people turn away voluntarily!!
7
To quote one of my favorite authors Laura K Hamilton: Stupidity isn't punishable by death if it were the world would have a hell of a population drop.
Quite rare to see war movies of this quality lately not to miss this Hunter killer
Commandos, submarines, coup d'etat, many well-received situations make this film an excellent surprise.
The casting does the job, the scenario spares the suspense and the fight scenes are rather realistic.
Everything is not perfect but let's not sulk our pleasure.
The least they could have done is made the Russians in the Russian Ship speak Russian for Russian Sake lol
Honestly thats so fucking cringe to hear background speaking basic russian words/phares, and the First Officer speaking english in thick russian accent. Like they cant get it more realistic to get actors who know how to speak russian or those who are willingly to learn russia for the role, isnt that like what actors do?
Yeah, at least in Red October, they speak Russian onboard Red October.
They speak Russian when they're with the Americans.
really, its been long time since watched this one but remembered they had these cringe moment here and there or was it just this clip what make it feel like it.
Says the Indian guy in the stupid picture holding his phone with earbuds in with strings attached to it. Lol
It is also worth mentioning that submarines do not launch missiles from the surface, this threatens to damage the skin. The launch is carried out from a certain depth of 50-100 meters, a large amount of gas is supplied to the cell containing the rocket and, due to the high pressure, the rocket flies out at high speed, flies out from under the water and flies up to a height of 40-50 meters, after which the engines will turn on. It is possible to launch from the surface position only from a certain type of submarine, and for this they are tipped a little on their side so that the rocket after departure does not damage the skin with a jet stream.
Another silly point - the Russians used anti-ship missiles. Submarines are destroyed with the help of helicopters, which, thanks to special devices, find submarines and launch torpedoes or with the help of special ships. The missiles fired by the Russians are capable of destroying a ship, but not a submarine.
And the last point - rockets don't explode like that. If they are conventional-fuel rockets, they will catch fire, explode slightly due to the ignition of the fuel, and fall into the water. There is also another type of rockets that fly due to their aerodynamics rather than fuel, and are more difficult to shoot down. Missiles do not explode instantly and completely, this is impossible.
Russian subs do...remember Syria?!
Also, no CIWS system made by anyone is stopping that many missiles in that span of time. And why would you build a base without any form of air defense?
Bruhhh, chill it's a movie
@@MrAfganistanac اكيد نتذكر كل شئ
There's a small chance missiles can explode if a direct hit is made on the blasting cap unless it is an electronic bridge blasting cap.
Huge plot hole: If the Yevchenko's CADS could neutralise 6 incoming missile travelling at full speed, it could even more easily blow two slow-launching Tomahawks right out of the sky. So the sub was absolutely no threat at all and the bluff just didn't exist.
It wasn't just about the nukes. The simple possibility that they actually could've pulled the trigger was the threat, because that would've kicked off World War III.
Sub did pose a threat not by missiles but by torpedoes. In the ending two tomahawks ready call was for command center not for the ship anyway.
0
@@usermk99 Exactly. Only idiots that didn't pay attention thought that the tomahawks were for the ship.
The crew of the Ыевченко we're aware that the Kapitan and the Federation President are onboard the Arkansas! And they saw Durov launch the S-500's from Polarney,there was only one choice to be made to divert total nuclear exchange!
US sub: "Batten down the hatches, boys. Big one coming our way"
Russian ship: "Chill, little brother. I got this"
According to the tactical principle, never arrange 2 rocket launchers close to each other and the radar vehicles are also located very far away, the director did not learn anything about the military.
They cgid it over some old katyusha launches LoL
@@mohsinshahidferdous708 🤣
Why the launchers can't close to each other?
@@nadaramadhan3377 the thrust of the rockets will set each other off course for one. These are not mlrs, these are asbm . Also possiblity of collision.
Also radars will get mass distortion at this close proximity from signal overlap and rift in the air from so many simultaneous launches.
Thế ông mong đợi gì ở bọn holyweed? :))
Tướng Nga luôn trong hình ảnh già, quân phục không chỉnh tề, dáng đi béo bự hoặc gà rù. Mỹ luôn trong trang phục thẳng thớm với bộ ngực nở rộng :)))))
When those missiles are about to hit the Russian President containing American submarine and the nearby Russian ship machine gun just whittles them out, is one of the most dramatically intense action scenes ever!
This movie is seriously an underrated gem!
🤣🤣🤣
@@olodiandrew219 what so funny?
@@computerscience1101 russian president containing american submarine
Funny thing this anti-missile system actually exist
CIWS
it does what it wouldnt be that effective xd
@@aalmeida1
They are that effective just from a greater distance
Kashtan??
Phalanx?
2:05 Fifteen seconds to impact
2:35 almost impact
Time moves twice as slow in the movie, hence proved, explains a lot
Dumb asś, they need to show the other scenes going on at that same time. Soooo use some brain.
@@Vardhan_Mantri bro, there is no perspective change, same location inside the sub.
Also it was a joke, congratulations for not having a sense of humor.
@@shashwatsharma2596 It seemed like a serious comment lol.
@@Vardhan_Mantri ok, np, every other comment was dunking on it, so I joined in
This is just an action movie but it has a deep meaningful story within.
It tells of how in the end militaries all over the world have the same duty to defend not to wage war but all it takes is just a group of small people to bring nations to war with one another....an that is how it has always happened, sadly!!
neam pls ?
@@obadajodeh9085 Hunter Killer
@@obadajodeh9085 it says the name in the description
Tbh, what I’ve never understood is why the Russian CIWS didn’t fire earlier.
Hollywood suspense purposes probably
WILL RUIN THE EXPERIENCE
Wasn't in the script lol
The closer the rockets get to the CIWS, the more efficient they are given the proximity factor. That close to the sub, the bullets from the CIWS create a barrier, which is what the rockets detonate against as if they had struck the sub itself.
It's just a movie, that why :)
They would never set MLRS up like that! Keep up the good work Hollyweird
If you want some realistic aspect then you should enlist , it's a movie for entertainment purposed not a history channel that goes to detail about how shit works ..
@@manjack235 oh blow it out ya arse, nobody cares about you correcting me.
the way the general was like fire was so funny, he was so determined
Imagine after all that, the Americans in sub pressed the missile by mistake
Tridents have sophisticated launch mechanisms one could abort the target
@@Mbfrmdao r/woooooooosh
@@khordad1216 it's not even a woosh because it's true if they accidentally pressed the first triggered there's still a switch to activate it first before pressing the main to launch.
@@bored-z2397 I woshed because he missed the joke. Jokes are not intended to be realistic you know.
Tomahawks would have been intercepted as well.
US: *does nothing*
Also US: GOOD JOB GOOD JOB
sometimes doing nothing is incredibly hard
Hahahahahahaha
@@TheDa6781 Yes, if ur an idiot.
Never get bored of that scene 👌
Can you explain what happened
3:43 When you fucked around and found out.
One thing about this that is accurate, Russian ships tend to have a lot more offensive firepower than ours. We rely on our carriers for offense, the other ships are there almost entirely to defend a carrier. A lot of them don't have any direct attack missiles anymore.
However Russian ships have also a lot less range or need to be supplied more often due to using more of their payload for weapons.
@@Suojeluninja Soviet design their ship for massive saturation attack and they would be fighting close to their naval base so it doesn't matter. US destroyers were designed to operate far from their base and be a multirole so.
@@Boomkokogamez Yup. It's a major difference in combat doctrine.
@Vulture Xxx Things someone from a second tier country would say
@@Elthenar it's fourth tier
I only have one question:
Why are Submarine movies always Bloody Awesome!
GB owned this role. Great movie Actor.
What are other submarine movies to watch
@@TheSouthAfricanPost The Hunt for Red October. K19 The Widowmaker. Das Boot. U571? The Enemy Below. Crimson Tide (awesome!) Enjoy!
Movie: Beat advanced Russian technology
Reality: Run from flip flop sandal wearing, AK totting Taliban
They have a 34 nation Group to just keep an eye on Russia 🤷
Well what do you know
"AK47's IS FOR EVERYONE!!!!!"*ANGRY MOB CHEER NOISES INTENSIFIES*
As far as I remember some 26.000 soviet dies from those flip flops.
@@kashmirha but USA always said they superior to soviets which is actually true but the outcome was the same.
@@kashmirha Flip flops and a constant supply of Stinger missiles, CIA instructors and back door weapons from Pakistan and elsewhere. The US has taken far less casualties and have been there longer. More than twice as long as the Soviets, yet they withdraw in such a humiliating fashion? Somethings not right if you ask me.
is us army really as powerful as shown in hollywood
Americans: yes
Taliban: no!
Vietnam: no
Russians: blyat!!
yes they are, more powerful then u think
power serves purpose, and that purpose is to stay in power, so far so good, trust me.
Aliens: Be quiet you kids, or is bed time
People always forget that the USA did not "lose" the Vietnam war. What was 'lost' was the support of the American taxpayers who didn't want the war to continue. Without proper supplies and financing, no country in the world can accomplish winning a war and it has nada to do with skill or ability. It's like if someone handed you a gun with no bullets and said to kill someone. What would you say? "With what? Hitting them over the head with the empty gun with no bullets?"
@@user-tb2jy9lu3d what about Afghanistan, 2.25 trillion dollars and still of us army somehow managed to lose. Any explanation for this? 2.25 trillion dollar is enough to end world food hunger
I think this is the best US-Russia bromance movie since Hunt for Red October😅😅
Scenes of men hugging each other are most common in american war movies and gay porn.
🤣🤣
🤣🤣🤣
😂😂 lucky us they didn't su*k eachother o*f 😂😂
Timestamp?
@@Jr-mr2jk They are saving that for Hunter Killer part 2.
The title: "Love has no boundaries in the US NAVY"
the amount of waiting for every decision has me thinking they didnt actually get the brightest captain.... LOL
2:40 What a beast of a gun with that fire speed and accuracy
It's more faster and effective in real life, it's the Ak-630M1-2
@@icekidtvshorts4504 no it’s the kashtan
This movie litterally had the same amount of effort put into the effects as a monster movie from Syfy.
I'd that a lot or not much? Coz they look pretty good imo
People like you just mindlessly bash on this
Movie name
@@julianthursky-moore2438 looks like trash especially the building blowing up painfully obvious CGI..
some AAA games these days look more realistic than movies...
@@fonkyman Let's be real, if the effects were the best CGI in the world you'd still be hating on the film, so your argument is invalid to begin with.
The way he said "fire" is just so awkward.
Tbh, I think it sounded like an angry dog bark
He is russian , that is the most hype as it can get
I don't know how many times I have to rewatch that scene only.... 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂FIRE
He sounded like a german though 😀😀😀
@@miked9260 lol
In movies : 😎
In real life: ☠️🤣
Never seen that movie. I will be watching it tonite.
Great scene. Everything Butler touches is gold.
Have you seen The Bounty Hunter? 😂
@@LucasRogers92 No, I'll check it out.
We all know why
@@johnnyjohnston7879 Explanation is key, bro! I'm all ears...
This film gets it's fair share of critique but it's nice to see an illustration of modern naval weaponry. These hyper speed defensive gattling guns are absolutely real and designed specifically to shoot down incoming armament. But shooting across like it does as depicted would be harder than straight on.
Absolutely impossible from that distance and with that many missiles
look what happend to moskva, can't even stop just 2 neptunes
@Александр Якимов
For America the chief geopolitical prize is Eurasia(Russia)
-
Z.Brzezinski
@@nitonono4143 ну конечно нептун не смогои остановить))) блажен кто верует
@@nitonono4143 The system is not fully integrated with a central battle management system which alerts the ciws systems to ready themselves like it's being done with the western phalanx ciws.
in the case of the castan it is being operated one individual who manually handles the system and only when gives the ok to the castan system it starts to fire.
In the case of the Moskva it was ambushed so good that they didn't have the time. to react...
In my country Greece we have a laughable saying but serious if anyone knows its meaning:Silk shorts also require skillful asses. Which means if you have the tool you need also a skilled person to handle it..
I really doubt if the Russian navy has ever make drills for such scenarios... In my country we do...
The same think can also happen to west ships if their being targeted with hypersonic missiles or supercavitation torpedoes.
"Ох уж эти сказочки! Ох уж эти сказочники! Эх хо-хо."(с)
а мечтать под запретом ??
No one gonna talk about them saying they are firing from "russian soil", when on 1:53 on the map it shows them atleast 400km away from the russian border. Thats some fast rockets or the russians annexed norway without anyone noticing.
Lol
It says it is a hit *on* Russian soil, not *from* Russian soil
@@BigBoss-rr4sw That still doesn't change the fact that launching missiles from Russian soil towards Norway would take more than a few seconds... They get shot down by the magic CIWS system on the ship, which then launches two missiles of its own to 'Russian soil', again some 400KM away...
The movie depicts it as if they are at ~1500 meters distance, the director and editor don't even know where Norway and Russia are on a map...
that is the most awesome display of firepower I have ever seen
6 missiles to destroy 1 sub?? And just 2 missiles to destroy entire base?? 😂😂
And they use anti-ship missiles to kill submarine
They always fire them in volleys
A few go high and guide the others and if they get intercepted the low flying ones take their place
That way at least one or two make it
These systems are designed to hit carriers so it makes sense with all the f18s and cwis around in such a scenario
Yep! one has an advantage of mobility!
@@allent.g560 while it does seem odd at first glance, it's not entirely without merit. Many modern anti-ship missiles(such as the US's Harpoon are infact multi-purpose. They can either break apart to reveal the torpedo to attack a submarine, or remain intact and strike a surface ship. Im not entirely sure if Russia has a similar multi-purpose missile. But hey, its Hollywood, since when do they ever get anything historically accurate
😂😂🤣🤣
I’m in love watching this movie over and over again
Qual o nome do filme?
@@andersonpereira4649 Hunter killer
This clip from Hunter Killer is packed with tension! ⚓ The strategic moves and high-stakes decisions really keep you on the edge of your seat. The cinematography and action sequences are impressive! Gerard Butler and the cast bring such intensity to this underwater thriller!!!
3:23 the perfect wallpaper...
LoL... I always came back to watch that AAA destroying missiles 😁🤭.... just love that AAA sound n Rate of 🔥
Best movie out there ! 3 story lines and 100% action plus great acting and super plot !
You know its a movie because the rockets and trucks actually work and look well cared for.
This film they are not underestimate the russian Navy. In martial arts never underestimate your opponent Good Movie❤
That guy holding the trigger to launch, waiting for years to do that one role he has but couldn't. 😅
Very good movie. It's outstanding in humanity. The enemy is not always the enemy.
One of the best scene in navy movie
Movie name
Have u ever seen battleship ?
More like one of the dumbest scene.
@@lingeringsnowleaf3829 yeah yeah🤣🤣
Das Boot
النصر لروسيا و الشعب الروسى العظيم.... و الموت و العار لأمريكا و حلف النيتو و كلابهم💪💪👍👍Viva Russia
Not realistic at all but cool for sure!!
If you want realistic watch documentary.
@@hprgaming9249 why are you getting so riled up!?
I am not saying that this movie is bad or you shouldn't watch it, why are you trying to pick a fight?
A lot of comments are saying the same thing, are you going reply to everyone of them!?
If you are having a bad day then don't bother others... Move on!!
@@harbinger_1984 LoL you blame this movie not realistic not me. 🤣
@@hprgaming9249 what!?
You need to learn some basic English!
Anyways.. It is unrealistic and that's a fact, now take your trap somewhere else!!
@@harbinger_1984 nah you blame this movie again...
As i said watch documentary if you want realistic scene. 😅
A movie scene that when i watch ALWAYS gives me a CHUBBY ...
More like this please .I love it ❤❤❤
Я русский... Живу в России. Офицер запаса. Мне хочется смеяться, глядя на это)))
любому человеку у которого голова не только для того чтобы в неё кушать , прекрасно понимает что данный фильм это отборная хуйня. Лютая клюква с примесью дичайшией фантазии
Ты тоже куриш
Мартыхан, это ж кинцо. Там по сюжету генерал берет в заложники избранного (уже смешно) президента.
Как настроения? Готовы к участию в отвоевании Малороссии?
I thought this was a fun movie, I know there's technicalities a lot of stuff that wouldn't actually happen. That's why it's a work of fiction! But they did a good job making it believable to Everyday viewers! And I like that it had a peaceful ending between the Nations, if only real life was so.
*To everyday American viewers
@@shubhajitdolui2184 nah us Europeans too.
Very authentic. Amazing tehnological feat.
Yeah, the sailor that held the missile launch device and did nothing else did a really good job according to another sailor.
MCmaddawg -- On subs in reality, the sorts of missiles that have nuclear warheads, require two commanding officers to approve the launch together, both independent of one another. The scene isn't too bad, because Butler's character to accede on his own terms, just as the officer holding the trigger did. Though in reality I doubt it would get so far as one them holding the trigger.
Hahaha
....good job for nothing
well he did do what he was supposed to do
Russian military to American military: - Everything is a joke to you right🙄😂
I love when Hollywood shows how military toys work
that gattling gun is cool as hell... damn
CIWS
@@aishitekurenai2041 AK-630
@@mrregik its kortik 30mm
@@aishitekurenai2041 CIWS on a russian ship? i have no comment
@@7777777fresh if american have ciws why not russian have it. Its like the us destroyer that have phalanx ciws, in russian ship they use AK-630 or Kortik 30MM
This is insane man ❤
when your team try to steal your kill but friendly fire is on
Russian warships are great. They even have battlecruisers. Although it was a Russian guided missile cruiser that fired the missiles. I think.
If By Battlecruisers you mean literally Spam Cruise Missile ships with god knows how much CIWS then yeah they have god tier ships.
Some western submarine sunk the Russian submarine kursk , that time Russia was a wick and Putin in front of people Putin given promise he will change a Russian ships .
@@нацияинтернационал Except the publicly available results of the investigation into why she sank revealed that there was a fuel leak in one of the torpedos. When the crew went to fire the training torpedoes at the battlecruiser in the exercise the spark used to turn on the torpedo ignited the leaking fuel. The resulting blast traveled through the forward torpedo room, through the open hatch into the bridge killing the command crew. That hatch was supposed to be closed as the boat was meant to be at alert. The remaining crew were forced to try and escape, it was noted in the investigation that in some compartments the blast had knocked oxygen producing tiles off the walls which upon touching water on the deck caught fire. The tiles converted CO2 to oxygen but produced a lot of heat, it wound up performing the same reaction on the water and the resulting heat made the tiles catch fire. The only good thing about the accident was that the reactor technician followed his training and scrammed the reactor, sealing himself in with it.
A destroyer to be correct, and no it doesnt carry the missiles it fires in the film. Just Hollywood bs.
i learn something new,thank you sir
Why Russian military base don't have anti missiles system to save military base.
Because That's American movie
Exactly
@@albertofelicani4190 buon giorno italiano?
Because of this is USA propaganda movie.
@@nicolovalsecchi4856 Don’t fall in love in the comment section!
1:37 Old man yelling "fire" has a rank on his shoulderboard with a star and above that, a wreath with a small star in that. I did the research and its a General of the Army.
No submarines nor sub personnel was harmed during the playing of this film because.... plot armor is INVINCIBLE
Logic is omitted in this scene
Thanks for following me do you have WhatsApp number or hangout email for good conversation
What? Why do u want to talk with me? I am from India.. From where are u
Boat Turret Gun America 😏😎🔥 hell Damn COOL :D
Very impressive and very best scene of this movie
“What just happened?”
Russians. Russians happened.
There are a few mistakes here.
One, submarines are difficult to fire missiles while floating, the surface of the submarine is able to withstand water pressure and cold temperatures but not the high heat from the rocket engine.
Two, Tomahawk cruise missiles are not used to intercept other flying targets.
Third, the Russian destroyer does not have that type of missile launcher, it uses small circular launchers on a large circle.
Because that ship couldnt be custom built and everything need to be real inside fiction?
The sub never fired any missiles.They just opened the silo doors.
The submarine was forced to emerge before that scene, else they would have been destroyed. They kind of gave up and made clear, that they are not the enemy but that they got that old captain on board (who had trained most of the Russian sailors on the warship) and the Russian president - who also made clear that any attack on the US submarine would be seen as high treason. The only question was, if the Russian warship would believe that AND not be on the side of the general who had planed this whole thing to take over.
Well, they were not, so they not only didn't follow the order to destroy the US submarine, but defended it against the attack ordered by the general (and yes, of course the CIWS scene was made for tension, they would have fired anti air missiles and shoot at the incoming missiles much earlier).
The Tomahawks were an order of the US defense minister, to take out the Russian command center with the general, but the captain of the submarine of course saw this as an insane risk to start WW3. The Tomahawks were not meant to defend them against the incoming missiles (in that case it would be just stupid to wait). He didn't fire to make clear, that they are not the aggressor.
They said to counter fire meaning they would fire at the mlrs and the building they even said they could start a war
Wow i like the sound kortik's CIWS if firing, Its soo satisfying
Kashtan my dude.
@@gigachad4715 it's both actually Kashtan is an export name for Kortik CIWS
yeah, sounds like a chain gun of some sort
@@ReFr4ct1oN actually kashtan is the missile mounted variant of kortik
@@reaperch.2476 both Kortik and Kashatan have missile and non-missile variants. Thing is that "Kashtan" was initially export name for the system but now "Kashatan-M" is also used for mounts placed on russian ships too.
"Kortik" now is just an old name.
Love it love it👍😃.
0:35: Wait a sec. That's Upstanding citizen Vlad from Payday 2.
2:39 Yevchenko fires Kortik (30mm) CIWS gatling gun. Try to save the USS Arkansas from Durov's Kh-35 Anti Ship Missiles
I think that kanstan,air defense
@@briellabounce the AO-18K autocannons are part of the Kashtan CIWS, it mounts 2 of them.
These however may actually be the AO-18KD, and this could be a Pantsir-M (the incoming replacement for the Kashtan, basically a direct upgrade in all regards). Its hard to tell from that angle as both systems have a similar profile and I can't recall which year this film is based in.
@@cgi2002 its not Pantsir-M or 3M87 (Kortik/kashtan), its 3M89 (Phalash/Palma). AO-18K also functions differently from regular GSh-6-30 due addition of cooling system and electric motor
@@Nothing_._Here seems you right, its profile does match the 3M89 which means its using A0-18KD's.
There is surprisingly little info around about the 3M89, other than that it's basically the light weight version of the Kashtan with the upgraded gun from the Pantsir-M. Have to admit it's a nice piece of hardware and still follows the same design logic of "more dakka".
@@cgi2002 3M89 has existed for 2 decades longer than Pantsir-M. Pantsir-M if anything is a downgrade from 3M87/89 due inferior electronics.
I am Russian, I am a patriot... I think the same as you, patriots of your countries. Believe me, none of the normal people want war... It's all politics and political games. And for the most part, we're all the same. God forbid that there was no war. God is with us!!!
get out of ukraine then
1:38. Как он говорит слово "FIRE"😂 Ржу нимагу. Как будто собака подавилась костью и пропердела через задницу😂
да это не собака, это обычная жертва блокадного ленинграда😉
Wow, so charming, the huge fire power this machines can carry is just awesome.
0:43 nice 30$ safe... The one which u can open even without code
CREDITS:
TM & © Lionsgate Films (2018)
Cast: Gerard Butler, Gary Oldman, Common
Screenwriter: Jamie Moss, Arne Schmidt
Director: Donovan Marsh
I don't understand how Hollywood most of the time gets military ranks wrong
Not even one piece of debris or scrapnel hit that sub
They did, you heard the metal banging sounds as some of it fell on the sub
@@lorensrewolle3860 and nothing went through the hull n out the otherside. We are talking supersonic here. Not a granade schrapnel. That boat should have been hit n hit bad like a few dead ppl inside the hull
@Kevin cruise missiles don't fly supersonic speeds
Good job joblo ❤❤❤
A RUSSIA naval base with no missile defense, highly effective CIWS system and a plot armor sub. Nice!
This scene was incredibly well done. Every detail, including the missile targeting radar
Эта сцена невероятная чушь, а игра актеров еще хуже нереального боя😂😂😂
@Extrorvor well it's Hollywood so they are entitled to some liberty
@@oksysparrow6254 nonsence like all Hollywood 😂
yeah. Except for a few things.
Artillery guns turning on a dime to snipe missiles.
2 tomahawks ready to shoot down 8 missiles
S-300 Anti-air missiles used as ballistic missiles (well, that one, as it seems, is actually possible)
@@nurnburgring3102 The Tomahawks were intended to be a counterstrike against the base not the missiles, sort of like M.A.D.
It's a movie, fellas, not a documentary.
After all its a Hollywood movie 😂😂 in reality the sub would already been destroyed 😂 such close detonation even if its intercepted.
Because Hollywood makes films for brainless people
And it is impossible for CIWS system to destroy as many missiles at the same spot especially when they fire ~perpendicularly to their flight path. Every process takes some time, even impact on warhead and its explosion and with the speed of those missiles some would explode when hitting the sub. Besides - hitting missile cannot guarantee setting off its warhead - it is known issue of the CIWS system design - missile has to be successfully intercepted at some distance from the ship, otherwise it may suffer great damage from the near explosion; or if the missile is just destroyed in terms of its controlled flight, its inertia and crash course may still keep it on collision course with the ship - in that case, there would be no difference between intercepted and non-intercepted missile (unless by some luck, detonating system were disabled).
@@mungo7136 most people who watch Hollywood films have never heard about science, they eat popcorn and believe what they are shown
@@Жизньучителявдеревне I know.
Its a fucking movie
러샤 형들 넘 멋짐..
RIP Mikael Nyqvist - He Played Sergei Andropov 8 November 1960 - 27 June 2017
Engagement radar deploying at the same time as the missiles. That will be interesting ..
Я хочу сказать что только вместе можно иметь безопасности и красивое небо над головой.... война не когда не хорошо,мы не дикие животные чтобы друг друга порвать и ховастаться....
Актуально для Украины
Человек на самом деле куда хуже диких животных
@@ayzekus как это называется!!?
@@Мурзик-э5щ это называется дружба народов)
That destroyer has the world respect
Salut
2:10 Robin Williams is the triggerman?
Movie came out 4 years after he passed.