10 Cheapest Aerobatic Airplanes For Sale

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 сер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 62

  • @mikepolen5903
    @mikepolen5903 2 роки тому +6

    There are two "Aerobat"s, the Cessna 150 version and the 152 Version. Both are +6/-3 g aircraft, the differences between them being the same as the basic differences between the 150/152: most importantly, the change from the O-200 Continental to the O-235 Lycoming. The "Aerobat" versions add stronger struts, some thicker metal in key areas, and D-ring pulls to jettison the doors in an emergency.

  • @rosswhittle1910
    @rosswhittle1910 3 роки тому +19

    The 15oA is the "Aerobat", not the "Acrobat".

  • @robcooper2791
    @robcooper2791 3 роки тому +9

    Music drowned out the whispered narration. Otherwise, quite useful...

  • @mikemike6443
    @mikemike6443 2 роки тому +1

    This was quite fun to watch! Thank you for putting it together

  • @kirkwagner461
    @kirkwagner461 Рік тому

    Thanks for this. Concise and to the point information.

  • @fuffoon
    @fuffoon 8 місяців тому

    The blue Pitts looks purplish on the thumbnail and I like it.

  • @jvon811
    @jvon811 Рік тому +1

    7:23 hmm… that RV-4 looks pretty dang familiar, lol

  • @peterlovell8106
    @peterlovell8106 9 місяців тому +1

    the red, white, blue “Sonex” is actually a “Onex”, how do I know, beause it’s mine. It’s also a very modified 80hp aerovee in order to run sustained inverted. it would be nice to be asked before being “reposted” like this

  • @scotabot7826
    @scotabot7826 2 роки тому +1

    What is a Cezzna? Cool video? The Aerobat is a +6 -3 G aircraft.

  • @jorgedanaia7727
    @jorgedanaia7727 3 роки тому +2

    Hi Maxx... you didn´t mention on this video, but I would still like to know what you think of the "Chisten Eagle"?! Difference tween the Eagle and the Pitts?? Great video man, well done!

    • @maxxmccrae6383
      @maxxmccrae6383  3 роки тому +1

      I can do a video compairing the two if you would be interested? But breifly, the differences between the two are aerobatic G range/limits. The Eagle is more of a recreational aerobatic plane (Basic/ intermediate competition performer) and the Pitts is more of a stronger plane that can handle more stress. The Pitts will take you into advanced category. But Ive flown the Eagle personally and it is an amazing plane.

    • @jorgedanaia7727
      @jorgedanaia7727 3 роки тому

      Thanks for that Maxx, and in terms of price? I suppose the Pitts would be more expensive, if it is a stronger plane?!

    • @maxxmccrae6383
      @maxxmccrae6383  3 роки тому

      @@jorgedanaia7727 Depends on the model, if you want a single seat Pitts you can find them for fairly cheap but the two seat models are well north of 100k, if your looking for performance then the pitts but if your looking for an affordable two seat with decent aerobatics eagle is the best for that.

    • @maxxmccrae6383
      @maxxmccrae6383  3 роки тому

      @@jorgedanaia7727 Yeah, the Pitts 2 seat model will run you around 100-150k while you can find eagles around 70-100k

  • @pcbondart
    @pcbondart 2 роки тому

    I owned a Citabria, THANK YOU!

  • @thegreatdeception2563
    @thegreatdeception2563 18 днів тому

    My dad had a Pitts s1c

  • @citabria4804
    @citabria4804 3 роки тому

    Yep a Citabria is for me preferably a 7GCAA or 7GCBC

  • @rosswhittle1910
    @rosswhittle1910 3 роки тому +4

    There is no option to put a 180HP engine in a Sonex- the maximum in 100. Did you mean 80HP, as in the AeroV?

    • @philipritson8821
      @philipritson8821 6 місяців тому

      Actually a Jabiru 3300 is 120 horsepower!

  • @zenvairpilot
    @zenvairpilot 2 роки тому

    you should add the SPA Panther.

  • @goldwinger5434
    @goldwinger5434 3 роки тому +3

    Isn't the Cessna the "AERObat" not the "ACRObat"?

    • @maxxmccrae6383
      @maxxmccrae6383  3 роки тому

      Correct, for some reason I thought it was the acrobat? My bad.

  • @cmhbaxter
    @cmhbaxter 3 роки тому +2

    Good job! Which one are you getting?!

  • @TheMarcball
    @TheMarcball 10 місяців тому

    Thanks.
    Please lower the background music.

  • @josephliptak
    @josephliptak 2 роки тому

    You forgot the 160HP Piper Tri-Pacer. In the 70s I did aerobatics all day long in one.

  • @crunchied8
    @crunchied8 2 роки тому

    I am looking at the steen skybolt, Bucker Jungmann and Christian eagle still not sure on it need more information

  • @philipgardner-uz5ne
    @philipgardner-uz5ne 4 місяці тому

    Howabout,,robin 2160/yak 52??

  • @rosswhittle1910
    @rosswhittle1910 3 роки тому +1

    NOT why it's called "One design"- it because it was intended for a "One design" competition category.

  • @40joel
    @40joel Рік тому

    You only have two aerobatic competitors on here. The DR and the Pitts.

  • @deani2431
    @deani2431 7 місяців тому

    You missed the best one of all……the Thorp T-18. All metal, 2 seater, 1,000 mile range, 180+ MPH, 80 lbs baggage!!

  • @josephliptak
    @josephliptak 2 роки тому +1

    The Cessna is an Aerobat, not Acrobat.

  • @cavu22
    @cavu22 2 роки тому

    Christen Eagle......blows the doors off most in your list.

    • @maxxmccrae6383
      @maxxmccrae6383  2 роки тому

      The eagles an amazing airplane for sure! Just that purchase price is $$

    • @cavu22
      @cavu22 2 роки тому

      @@maxxmccrae6383 No! They are the best 2 seat buy on the market at the moment. A steal now,until the owners realize what they have and how the market has gone up so much in the past few years.

  • @Jim.Thunda
    @Jim.Thunda 2 роки тому

    Next time include the Thunder Mustang that's Not
    If you can keep the Falconer going.

    • @maxxmccrae6383
      @maxxmccrae6383  2 роки тому

      Ill inclued the Thunder Mustang for most expensive airplane hahah!

  • @francisbalzer9324
    @francisbalzer9324 3 роки тому +7

    When flipping around the sky, maybe I don’t want my last thought to be how economic I was getting into a precarious situation. Just saying.

    • @maxxmccrae6383
      @maxxmccrae6383  3 роки тому

      Purely for entertainment.

    • @mikepolen5903
      @mikepolen5903 2 роки тому +1

      If you understand how aircraft are designed and engineered, and you stay within the design limits of your aircraft, there is no significant increase in risk from flying these aircraft vs. a $200k+ Extra, Edge, or Sukhoi. Find good people to help you pick a solid example, get the proper training, maintain your aircraft properly, and go have fun.

  • @philipritson8821
    @philipritson8821 6 місяців тому

    180 horsepower in a Sonex?
    I don't think so!

  • @Truthwarrior106
    @Truthwarrior106 Рік тому

    The Pitts S1S rolls at 180 degrees per second, the S1T comes with symmetrical ailerons rolls 270 per second , and the 2 passenger 6cyl Pitts S2B rolls 240 per second. Certainly NOT 400 per second !

  • @vloogle4924
    @vloogle4924 Рік тому

    What did he say?

  • @scotabot7826
    @scotabot7826 2 роки тому

    I would use the word inexpensive!! Cheap and aircraft don't go in the same sentence.

  • @cptcliffhanger
    @cptcliffhanger Рік тому

    That's not a clipped wing cub. Just a cub.

  • @umami0247
    @umami0247 2 роки тому

    The Pitts all the way.

  • @rafdecc
    @rafdecc 3 роки тому

    PITTS S 1 IS RATED 9 + 6- 3000 FT. P.M. CLIMB WITH MY 180 A4B CROSS OVER EXHAUSTS = 200 HP FUEL INJECTED EXPERIMENTAL

  • @stickandrudderindy
    @stickandrudderindy Рік тому

    It’s Cessna “aerobat” not “acrobat”

  • @cw93711
    @cw93711 Рік тому

    under 100k
    the rv8 😂 it's up to 200k
    go with
    the rv4 is bette
    the one one design 107 or 109 is much better.
    the acroduster 2 seat
    the one one design 107 or 109 is much better.
    star duster 2.
    yak 55
    yak52
    cj6a
    great lakes bi plane

  • @Llewen.werdna
    @Llewen.werdna 2 роки тому

    Music is too loud!

  • @user-jx1mz8rg6t
    @user-jx1mz8rg6t 8 місяців тому

    Steam locomo

  • @bryanaveri6816
    @bryanaveri6816 3 роки тому

    A Beechcraft sport can be bought for $25,000

  • @williamkrise2583
    @williamkrise2583 Рік тому

    Music and you talk way to fast could not understand anything try listening to the video before you post or did you rob the video from someone

  • @BetterCallGatto
    @BetterCallGatto 3 роки тому

    You talk like that guy
    From family guy

  • @DC8Super72
    @DC8Super72 Місяць тому

    Speak up son!

  • @AerobatBrian
    @AerobatBrian 2 роки тому

    The Cessna Aerobat does NOT cruise anywhere near 120MPH, maybe the "ACROBAT" does. Honestly if you are going to review/rate airplanes at least become familiar with them.

    • @mikepolen5903
      @mikepolen5903 2 роки тому +4

      Actually, a nice 152, Aerobat or regular, can cruise around 105 kts, which is...121 mph...just sayin'.