Sully Movie CLIP - I Eyeballed It (2016) - Tom Hanks Movie
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 жов 2024
- Starring: Tom Hanks, Aaron Eckhart, Mike O'Malley, Jamey Sheridan
Sully Movie CLIP - I Eyeballed It (2016) - Tom Hanks Movie
The story of Chesley Sullenberger, who became a hero after gliding his plane along the water in the Hudson River, saving all of the airplane flights 155 crew and passengers.
Subscribe to COMING SOON: bit.ly/H2vZUn
Subscribe to TRAILERS: bit.ly/sxaw6h
Like us on FACEBOOK: bit.ly/1QyRMsE
Follow us on TWITTER: bit.ly/1ghOWmt
The Fandango MOVIECLIPS Coming Soon channel is the destination for movie clips, interviews, trailers, TV spots, behind-the-scenes videos, and all promo content for the hottest new movies. Fandango MOVIECLIPS Coming Soon has all the newest content in one place. Good luck getting any work done once you start poking around this channel.
"I was drunk... I'm drunk now."
Wait, wrong airplane movie.
Well hello sir.
😆😆
it's the twist we didn't see coming-- he DID the calculations because he was super hooped up on time dilators
this actually made me cry of laughter
thumbs up for you!
Hahahaha goddamn
When an f4 Phantom pilot tells you he "eyeballed it", you respond with "excellent decision Sir. Thank you and congratulations."
He's also a glider pilot. He knows n his gut the equation which balances altitude and distance.
@@bridgefin He's also a cart collector that used the change to buy hamburgers when he lived in an airport in his younger years.
@@BoopSnoot
I met Sully earlier this month in Seattle at the memorial for Al Haynes (pilot United 232). He gave a great talk and was very impressive about what Hayne's miracle had meant to him over the years.
The actual investigators were on his side. This movie is a dramatisation
@@bridgefin Damn I never knew Al Haynes died! Was hoping I'd get to meet him again. Met him before his presentation at Wichita years ago and got to visit with him in the hallway alone for a few minutes. Great man!
Sully managed to land the plane because he eyeballed it. Meanwhile, Denzel managed to land the plane because he eightballed it.
lollers
Both however was effective.
well done sir
🤣 Good one!
Denzel is an awesome man. Kind and loving.
no sir - I used the IBM supercomputer we have in the cockpit to do a few million simulated landings and asked the boys back at the airport to check the calculations through while I went and got myself some coffee and leftover lasagna from the kitchen. It checked all out, so after we all had a short nap to ensure maximum efficiency we put it down in the Hudson River.
Perfection
Lol
Sounds good to me
Hero
good work
*THIS IS NOT WHAT HAPPENED IN REAL LIFE.* Sully himself hates this movie for how it portrayed the investigators. They are legally required to investigate every crashlanding everytime it happens. Sully made it clear that they were very respectful and understanding to the situation and cleared the whole thing up quickly. They just added this drama to make the movie longer.
Douglas Murphy Exactly, the real life investigators weren’t trying to get at Sully or get him into trouble. They were simply just trying to get the full story on why Sully did what he did. That way they could possibly formulate a plan for other pilots on what they might need to do in case they found themselves in the position Sully was in. In fact Sully was just doing his job, if a plane needed to make an emergency landing and the airport couldn’t be reached, pilots were instructed to ditch into the Hudson River. No one was seriously injured or killed during the landing which by all means would mean that Sully pulled off a well executed emergency landing into a body of water. Even if Sully could’ve made it to the airport without having to conduct a emergency landing, the investigators at least should try to understand why he made that call.
they had to add the drama to give the movie a plot... without the drama you cant make this movie. you might as well make another documentary(when dozens already exist).
It's a movie human, what did you expact
Douglas Murphy it’s a movie based on true events that happened. if it was an exact carbon copy of what happened, an exact account of events, then it would be classed as a documentary.
@@lilytheflower7467 Or expect.
As a Kerbal Space Program player, there is no such thing as crashing, only lithiobraking
*unintentional lithobraking
@@technicallydifficulties7094 with rapid disassembly scheduled right after touchdown
@@chriseffpunkt4333 even Elon musk uses that term for spaceX. Rapid Kinetic Disassembly.
I am so proud you are top comment. May the kraken be on your side.
Rapid disasemblement
Unrealistic. Crash investigators would have understood the difficulty of running "calculations" in the limited time available
The 80/20 Drummer Lol
Well there was an investigation into this flight and initially there was an argument that they could have made it back to LaGuardia
It isn't that unrealistic. There was an investigation.
No it's not
They did have to deal with an investigation. They made it slightly more intense in the movie.
I think Sully made one other decision that isn't being discussed: That was to if humanly possible not kill anyone on the ground. Even if the landing is unsurvivable going into the Hudson limits the damage.
not in the movie.. but in real life the investigators (who DIDNT tried to blame him) lauded his decision as the best posible one as it possed the less risk for everyone involved.. including people in Manhattan
I can no longer remember the details or even find this in Google, but decades ago a USAF pilot had a choice between orienting his plane for safe ejections of his crew (this was before the awesome ACESII seat that will do incredible stuff) but also put the bomber over a neighborhood. He chose to bank and go for a landing in a field. No survivors, but coldblooded heroism. That bomber would have killed dozens, maybe hundreds.
This is where the term controlled ditch comes from. Choosing where to crash to both save those on the ground and your crew.
@@JWilliamsLangley He made a great officer. Please tell me who it was.
@@@virtuosowins Sadly I remember reading about it in an Air Force safety publication too long ago.
no one died?
thats a landing in my book...
hell, he could have landed inside a volcano, no casualties?
LANDED in a volcano
MaxUniverse
Sully and the volcano
How does one “land” on what is not land?
@@AlphosnoMango it simply means to return the the earth after fight. Plenty of planes use floats for water landings, very common in Alaska. Floats are extremely common, as I'm sure your well aware
TheTyphoon365 thanks
Oddly enough, Tom Hanks did a movie called Joe Versus The Volcano.
Not enough altitude to perform the “Impossible Turn.”
When technology fails you, experience and Sir Isaac Newton in the driver’s seat is the only alternative left.
What happened was this. After the event, experienced airline pilots were put in a simulator and set up in the same scenario. They were able to make a direct return and landing on the airport. However, they knew the event was going to happen and were mentally prepared for the procedures necessary to set the plane up and what the prime maneuvers would be. So, they had the ideal situation. Sculley, on the other hand, neither had foreknowledge of the event nor did he have the situation fully pre briefed before it happened. He had to establish what happened, determine the damage to the plane, start emergency procedures, communicate the situation to the tower, and determine the best path forward. All on the fly. The investigation was Monday morning quarterbacking at its best.
@Anthony ImBoden not sure myself. The article I read just talked about the tests that told them ahead of time.
What this movie gets TOTALLY wrong is that the NTSB was in full support of the pilots. The real CPT Sully said si himself and was actually angry and the production for going that route.
BUT.....the movie needed an antagonist. SO......
@@Soldier4USA2005 I think the reason the director went the rout he did was to portray the NTSB in the role of the Monday morning quarterbackers who tried to show the water landing was unnecessary. It would have made it a much more complicated movie if they had introduced too many viewpoints. Anyone truly interested in the full story can easily find the info. The movie was designed to be entertaining rather than documentary.
yeah i mean if it was at 7,000 going 250kts indicated sure. But less than 3,000 only 200kts, NOPE way too dangerous.
There was no where near this level of cynicism from officials in reality. This movie really did do a hatchet job on a lot of professionals for the sake of drama and contrived conflict.
Yeah, it's the same thing in Apollo 13. The movie has all this yelling and drama, but you can listen to the recording of the astronauts and everyone is just calmly Getting On With It. Professionals don't have time for drama.
These are movies for entertainment, not documentaries.
@@sabatino1977 Yes, but drama that doesn't feel natural makes for "bad" entertainment.
This movie is mostly about Clint Eastwood’s dislike of government.
@@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549 starring...... an empty chair
"Another happy landing." - Obi-Wan Kenobi
GENIUS!!!!!!!!!! LOL
The eyechrometer is widely regarded in engineering as one of the most reliable tools. Didn't know it was used in aviation too.
oh its used in a myriad of professions :)
We call it the Mark 1 eyeball. Best instrument you’ll ever have, doesn’t need batteries and you’ll always know where it is when you need it
In 10 years of machining, I’ve never heard someone say eyechrometer. I fully choked on my drink, and will now never say anything else. Thank you for pissing off coworkers for decades to come.
From all my years of flying planes… over 20 of them… I can look out the window and pretty much immediately know what I can glide to, what is beyond gliding distance, and what will result in too steep of an angle to glide directly to unless you do some extra maneuvering or add a lot of drag.
It is found to be most effective when used with the S.W.A.G. method.
Sully was a hero, especially to the NTSB. He prevented certain tragedy and did what should have been impossible with no time to prepare. He had only his years of commercial and military aviation to tap into. And a crew that worked like a well oiled machine.
Let's not forget he also had a flight instructor certificate for gliders which came in handy here.
YuuUP!
@@joeuser2360The two best dead stick landings in commercial aviation history, Sully’s, and the Gimli Glider were both piloted by experienced glider pilots.
This is actually good testament to what mastery looks like. Whatever you do it becomes second nature to you. Much like he said about thousands of flights. For people like him "eyeballing" is on whole different level that it would be for inexperienced pilot.
Sully should have simply said:
"Sirs, Madam, I direct you to my co-pilot's awesome moustache. Your arguments are now invalid."
That would have ended the movie too early. Far too epic an ending imo
Magnum PI approved
Lmao
that `tash is right. ALWAYS.
🤣🤣🤣
The movie negatively portrays the investigators when in actual fact it's just standard procedure.
But I love the point about "I eyeballed it", when you have no engines and you're deciding what to do you can't waste even a few minutes going back and forth with control over what action to take and whether it will work, pilots are indeed trained to have good judgement in this kind of situation and make that call on what action is most likely to save the most lives. The real life event is truly a testament to training and experience, not only from the pilots but also the cabin crew, and also demonstrates why it's important to pay attention to pre-flight safety videos and follow cabin crew instruction.
Standard?
There was a crazy amount of leaking which was trying to portray Sully as the culprit the media did not generally buy it but it still made its way in. This standard procedure when it involves a billion dollar industry. They try to reduce it down to one person so as to make it look like it is not a problem outside that experience.
In big air accidents if the pilot is dead they normally try to find grey areas that can be blamed on the pilot. This is not done to damage the pilots name but to ensure that it is not focused on technical systems that have wider implications.
The Hudson River landing was a grey area and was not a clear cut ruling. They only gave their support to Sully when it was realized that he public was on his side.
Reading the Pilot Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge reveals that some decisions need to be made quickly and critically. Some circumstances dictate that extended focus on any one variable will cost you precious time in making a decision, executing, and observing the results.
"i love the point about i eyeballed it" lol wut thats barely a point. i can tell from that sentence u have no idea what ur talking bout
The problem with this the NTSB knew he made the right decision. I guess it would have been a boring movie without it.
Daniel Treadwell
That’s a good name
I approve
@Daniel Treadwell In reality I think the airline themselves were kinda pissed because they felt the plane could've been saved after landing potentially
@Daniel Treadwell yes - apparently he didn't close a particular hatch in time (because he was busy saving people) and if he had the plane wouldn't have sunk
Exactly if the plane is doomed anyway why add to possible collateral damage?
@@Relbl they have insurance for these kinds of things and if he attempted to land in an airport it could've ended much worse
I think people see a movie based on an actual event and think "Yep, that's how it happened." The NTSB did not try and make Sully out to be the bad guy or even try and say he made any mistakes. He actually got very high praise from the NTSB for his decisions.
I wonder how many people think Rose and Jack were real from Titanic??? lmao
No, they don't. But a lot of people it seems see a movie that has dramatized events, and just assume everyone else is dumber than they are and don't realize it isn't factual. We all get it. They took dramatic liberties. You're not the only one who understands that it's fiction.
Jack Dawson wasn't real?😢
So are you claiming that they did not try to go down the route of pilot error and that the rumours that were being circulated that he did not carry out the correct procedures were not started from within the system.
Titanic was based on a true story, so jokes on you.
@@MalrickEQ2 But Jack and Rose weren't.
It's always the same....people who have no idea how to do your job, trying to tell you how you should have done your job.
Scott Cooper always the same, people assume trash in movies are in real life.
Chicha 17 not sure where this is coming from.
Chicha 17 You realise the NTSB is made up of experienced pilots. How the movie portrayed investigated what completely different of what actually happened. The movie did that only to create conflict where was none for entertainment.
Amen Amigo! LOL
It's always people in government too. You never get this kind of unsolicited second opinion nonsense in the private sector, because if you didn't know how to do your job you'd be fired.
Experience and one hell of a gifted pilot saved lives....the end.
If you read the comments below any movie clip, you see how we got to the mixed states of “reality” we find ourselves in. An astounding amount of people seem to mix portrayals of reality with actual events and lose the thread on which is which.
Lovely! Just f’ing lovely.
40 years of experience is what Sully had to work with and he had to go with a Forced Water Landing...So you lose a 60 million dollar Jet it's Insured ...Everybody gets a Second Chance to tell a loved one I love you
In all fairness, it is more than just the loss of a jet. Water landing is extremely difficult and dangerous. When you watched the film, do you remember the part where the young control tower guy locked himself in a room after finding out Sully decided to land on the Hudson? The control tower guy thought they were all dead because how dangerous it is. These investigators (for the right reason, but the wrong attitude) thought Sully is too rash to land the plane on water -- which is very risky.
This is why it was a *miracle* on the Hudson with no one person getting hurt.
Chemicalkinetics i sincerely hope youre not trying to defend this movie.
Defend what? A very entertaining and well acted movie? I mean it's not Saving Private Ryan or The Green Mile but not every movie needs to be on that level to be considered good.
Chemicalkinetics water landings are a disaster. I agree with you.landing in a river ,however,is not so crazy ...oceans cause of the waves cause havoc and destroy planes which gladly is not the case here :-)
Thanks.
You can tell this movie was directed by Clint Eastwood. He disdains the government, and made the FAA and NTSB investigators into the enemy.
Even Sullenberger himself said that he ever got any issue or anything but admiration and amazement from every member of the FAA that investigated the water landing.
Did the investigators go over every part of the crash? Of course. That's the job. But nobody questioned that the flight would have been a disaster had the crew made any other decision.
Shrugs, “He eyeballed it.”
At the end of the day he saved the crew and it’s passengers. Remarkable!
I have a buddy who saved his own skin on a bike. Lady in front of him slammed on the brakes going through an intersection. We thought he was laying it down and prolly get killed. Just at the last second almost laying it down he popped the clutch downshifted slammed the gas swung the bike around the car and saved himself. We talked about it. Just like sully he cashed in 40 years of riding knowledge to pull that off. It was something to see.
This is the reason why college graduates are not good in the workplace. They have been give confidence they have simply not learned.
In a military career real world experience is far more important than drills.
I can’t watch the movie without thinking about him and Baldwin doing SNL about this! Hilarious “I’m sully” 😂
Sully is a hero. It is pretty reasonable to figure you can not make it back to an Airport when you "eyeball it" and you realize that you are lower than the nearby skyscrapers. And that a relatively soft landing in the river is by far the best choice.
I love how when the bald dude says dumb things and sully corrects him and then the bald says "Captain" with such emphasis as if sully is the dumb one
“I eyeballed it”
*meanwhile*
“What do you mean, you ‘eyeballed it’?”
“Well, sir, we weren’t going to make contact if we didn’t divert our flight. I told the whole flock to turn East so we could make contact with that damn plane!”
*Goose Pack Leader*
His experience and skill made this water landing as good as it was.
I will fly with this man anytime!!!!!!
Tom hanks is perfect for every role ge played
He's such an inspiration! And definitely alive still! Even though all his interviews are him with a shaved head and with minimal perspective
First, I still have MILES of respect for Captain Sullivan. I would always aspire to be able to be as cool and clearminded in an emergency as he was. I know this interview was dramatized to make the movie more interesting, but the NTSB guys should have challenged all of his decisions, then told him, "Sully, you done good!" I don't think anyone questions Sully's judgment in this case. But the point that is MOST important, that I think gets overlooked, is that in an emergency, New Yorkers, once again, proved they are EXCELLENT human beings. From someone that has lived out west, I have watched New Yorkers do stunning things that surprise me every single time. When the chips are down, I think that the people of the City of New York have proven that they'll drop what they're doing and rush in to help. So, from someone that has watched from the other side of the country, Sully wasn't the only hero that day, the people of New York are, too.
The NTSB investigators actually DID say that Sully made the right call, and there was no witch hunt against him inside the NTSB. That was purely Hollywood fiction because their stories need some kind of conflict.
"How dare you not do any calculating, I'd just tell the plane to wait and whip out my calculator!"
Eyeballing it saved the passengers, crew and countless citizens on the ground.😇
That's how I serve myself when it comes to food. I just eyeball how much I can consume. Works everytime.
"can consume" is usually much more than what is needed to consume 😁
@@freezedeve3119 Nope. I know exactly how much I need, years of expertise 😂
Tom Hanks is more Badass the more he grows older.
Watch this, then watch the clip of these guys trying to replicate the landing adding "The Human Factor". Great job Sully!
I agree we should not question these pilots in these situations and just consider it just another day at the office.
Especially when no one got harmed in the landing.
Fortunately, real life worked out better than this. The real investigators were extremely understanding and impressed with his actions. This is all just to make the movie more entertaining. Tom Hanks said it best at the end; "Everyone did their jobs perfectly."
This is me when someone asks how I made my BBQ ribs 😂
I rely on my experience of managing thousands of BBQ ribs for over four decades. I eyeballed it.
Sully:" I just showed all of u how to drop an airliner on the river and gave you training videos for decades. No lost passengers. You're welcome "
Me--What happend?
Sully--Lost both engines made a safe landing in the river. Everyone walked away some with minor injuries.
Me--Ok I'm good.
100/100 Tom Hanks is an awesome actor and always will be :)
Check out the scene after he's rescued in Captain Phillips
I know the actual investigators from this incident have said the movie portrays them in a very negative way that isn't faithful to how they were at the time... Doesn't change the fact that I hate all 3 of them every time I watch this movie.
They changed the names of the investigators in the movie as per Sully's personal request. The real investigators are actually fans of Sully lol!
A movie without a villain wouldn't make good bank. Someone has to be the bad guy.
You gotta love how he saved everyone and the investigators are basically accusing him of incompetence or doing it all on purpose like he wanted it to happen.
It's all hollywood bullshit BTW, the investigators (who are required to take a report) knew their jobs enough to recognize a good landing when they saw it, and were way more like "right, that was freakin' sweet - tell us everything!"
@Visplight in fact the motto of the NSTB investigation was "no one wanted to Skully, Sully!"
"How did you torture the guy?"
"I eyeballed him"
“Eyeballing” it is why everyone onboard survived. That and 40+ years of flying experience.
I feel better trusting his “eye-balling” vs others “calculations”.
Thats what I do every time I play kerbal space program
No, Spock. He means that he feels safer about your guesses than most other people's facts.
I prefer fight or flight over lengthy calculations.
Maybe eyeball them birds before you run over them.
@@romanfields7900 Clearly planes could benefit from falcon escort.
How does someone trust Tom Hanks knowing how great of an actor he is?
Yeah, they didn't even notice he wasn't the real Sully.
Nah, he opened up the calculator.exe from windows 95. He had plenty of time.
lolool
Sully rocks.
"I suppose pilots are as useful as they ever were, but they sure didn't live the way we did. I'll tell ya, there was a time when you took real pride in just GETTING there. Flyin' used to be FUN, Lou!"
- Frank Towns (James Stewart), "Flight of the Phoenix" (1965)
@joe jitsu Actually that is incorrect. Nobody died during the filming of Flight of the Phoenix. The pilot was killed while flying the "Phoenix" on a promotional tour after filming was completed. The hodgepodge finally crumbled under the strain and took the pilot's life in the process.
The point was, no matter how much you automate and computerize aircraft, there can never be a substitute for an actual trained and experienced pilot.
can they just give tome hanks the oscar every year already
Yes, he eyeballed it, but he also ball-balled it.
Never forget.
He "bean bagged" it, and when your bean bags are bigger then my bean bags, then you can question my decision.
I have worked with the FAA and NTSB before on an incident. All were highly professional, efficient and subdued given the nature of the work. None that i had ever seen shown any kind of behavior exibited by these movie investigators. It shows the real professional investigators in a negative light. Hollyweird is just that, weird.
It's just like internal affairs in law enforcement. Nobody likes the guys who are out to hurt their own people!!
The real pilot deserved a presidential medal of freedom
That's when experience and ability kicked in
"So then we decided to eat the passengers."
Wait, wrong airplane movie.
Captain Sully if your watching this video and comments, all I can say that eyeballing was a good move. You saved lives who gives a heck about the aircraft.
Translation: I got mad skill bruh
Thank you for dumbing this scene down for us uneducated viewers.
And I'd be happy for him to eyeball it again and again and again. There are MANY scenarios in aviation where you don't have the time to sit there and run calculations. You have fall back on your experience and instincts as an aviator to make some very fast decisions that could be the difference between life and death. This is a perfect example of a pilot quickly assessing his options and based on his experience, decided it was better to guarantee trashing a plane but saving everyone's lives, than MAYBE saving a plane but risking those same lives.
To Sully, the lives of his passengers meant more to him than the cost of the plane
Considering the circumstances if I were in the investigator's shoes after hearing Sully explain how he "eyeballed it" I would've said "alright,fair enough," shake his hand, then walk out of the room and the credits would roll.
That's basically what happened in the real investigation XD
The NTSB was highly praised throughout the investigation by the pilots, the members are the cream of their industry most being pilots themselves for decades like Sully. In fact Sully insist the script be rewrote to avoid the film revealing the real NTSB investigators names.
somewhere in the back of my mind....i think sully has been ready for this scenario to go down for YEARS!!.
I should hope so. I know a guy who's a flight instructor, and he can recite around 250 different types of emergency situations and exactly what to do in each. I suspect most pilots won't be able to memorise them all, but if they remember about 25%, landing on a river should be a piece of cake.
Sully was In a plane crash before... he lived on a island and ate coconuts for over 4 years! ...... he also had a friend, his name was Wilson 😌
So many souls
With great mustache comes great responsibility
Good mustache - tom Tucker
I'll fly with you anytime Sully
This is an entirely unrealistic depiction of how the NTSB actually works. This isn't some criminal investigation trying to get Sully in a "gotcha" moment. Maybe an insurance company lawyer would, but not the NTSB. Those men and women have a collective experience of decades in the air, and have the resources to hire experts from across the spectrum of the aviation industry.
Gives the theatrical movie some vavavoom tho doesn't it?
What you're thinking of is a documentary, which this is not.
Exactly, it's analysing everything to see if planes can be safer, look at what pilots did right so it can be incorporated into pilot training if it wasn't already, and anticipate any repeats of the same incident if at all possible.
Most members of the NTSB are former pilots themselves, and as stated by Nathan Johnson have vast experience in the aviation industry in multiple sectors from engineering to psychology, usually their very professional, (usually the cream of the industry) and not judgemental. Its very rare for the NTSB to come to the wrong conclusions of a accident or incident.
God bless captain sully
It's certainly a reasonable question to ask in the abstract: Was it possible to return to La Guardia and land safely rather than attempt a highly risky landing in the Hudson? Conclusion reached: ""Although an emergency return to La Guardia Runway 13 was technically feasible from an aircraft flight performance point of view, the emergency landing on the Hudson seems the most appropriate decision," Airbus said in an assessment submitted to the board."
The question was raised, did Sully spend too much time evaluating the situation until it was no longer possible to return to the airport? The answer was that what Sully did was reasonable given the circumstances.
Imagine the public outrage if the commission had decided to punish Sully.
That's the reason why the commission did not punish Sully. If he had of crashed the aircraft they would have blamed him for the accident.
Most people do not realize that politics is actually being played in these situations.
It wasn't just what was reasonable, it's what is required in an emergency situation. Pilots are not supposed to make decisions based on hunches but to follow proper emergency procedures. Turning around for LaGuardia immediately would have been improper procedure.
"That's how they taught us at Launchpad McQuack University."
This movie is about as accurate as "The Imitation Game", and both are slightly less realistic than Police Academy 6.
with 4 decades of flights and experience... I think he earned the right to say "I eyeballed it".
Yup ^^
"eyeballing" altitude and speed is probably one of the first things you learn as a private pilot.
I am stealing that quote from now on!!! I eyeballed it! haha
There will always be "Monday morning quarterbacks", whether it's the NFL, baseball, business, medicine, or aviation. Simulations have some value in training but a simulation is never a real life or death emergency.
Tom Hanks does such a great job in this movie.
208 seconds total.
Of course there were no calculations.
Even a few seconds slower decision-making may have resulted in disaster.
Pilot experience is gold & I will never trust a fully automated or remotely piloted aircraft.
I admire the sentiment, but pilot experience is what goes into these machine learning models. Eventually these algorithms will catch up. For many functions they already have replaced human pilots. In the Air Force, the AI in drones can now reliably defeat fighter aces who have decades of experience that they transferred to the AI by fighting against it.
@@cccspwn I still wouldn't fly on it. You cannot teach AI the value of a human life or hundreds of them.
I don't even get on an airplane unless I know Tom Hanks is at the controls.😎
I bet the Joker sent those birds to kill Harvey Dent.
Damn best eyeballing I've ever heard of.
I actually saw the landing kinda, I was driving to a store in Edgewater, NJ, which is literally next to the Hudson river and I saw a descending plane, really low, and I was 'huh, that's odd.' Because while there are three major airports near NYC, you never see planes that low in that particular area so close to the city, but the plane was flying so smoothly I said to myself, 'must be okay'. Then I go to the store to do my shopping, nothing was going on to indicate an emergency, you know police etc, traffic wasn't affected. Later I get home and see the news! I had one 'friend' who didn't believe me because everything had been so calm in the area, then later she was like, 'oh yeah you probably did see it', cause you know that sort of thing happens every day. *sarcastic face*
Sully “I eyeballed it.” Investigator on the right tries not to crack up laughing
This challenging drama was fabricated for the move. In reality investigators found no fault with Sully's eyeballing or judgement.
Yes, they know that what he did was nothing short of brilliance.
Did the investigators say that themselves or did the real life Sully say that in one of his interviews? Because if this movie is as accurate as it is, it seems as though Sully’s trying to give the NTSB the benefit of the doubt by saying “Oh they’re fine they’re just doing their job”
@@nelixsulu6201 A friend I've known for 19 years is in the FAA here as an inspector. Trust me. The movie did not present the investigation with much accuracy.
Yah, then why did he go to jail??
I can understand this. If you know how a plane operates and the physics involved it goes from being one of calculation to experiences leading to gut instinct where you can feel what the plane can do and can’t do. What I find cool is that he has 40 years of experience yet flew a plane (A320) that isn’t that old, but still knows the plane well.
This scene summarizes why I always hated it when people referred to the "Miracle On The Hudson". It wasn't a miracle, it was experience and skill. It also summarizes why I hate movie and television depictions of investigative committees. Their committees are always clueless and officious demagogues. In reality, most committees outside of congress are seeking answers and would rather not ruin careers.
I mean it was lucky that no-one on the river was hit.
"Experience and skill on the Hudson" just doesn't have the same ring to it though, lol.
Aaron Eckhart's mustache should have won an Academy Award.
If I'm in a plane where things are going to shit, I want a pilot with 40 years experience.
Sometimes that is the exact opposite of what you want. As I pilot myself some of the worst pilots I've flown with have had the most time.
Sloth55Chunk why is that?
@@rent2242 They get extremely cocky and they have most likely 40 years of bad habits. Airspace and rules change and as the saying goes: "you can't teach an old dog new tricks".
Save Tom Hanks! Get well, soon sir!
I like in this scene how Sully and Jeff are in all white almost as if they were angels.
I highly doubt that the investigators actually thought he was going to pullout a note pad, and start calculating distance and airspeed. I would bet this is movie mythology to add drama.
According to his book, if anything the real investigators were more certain that he got it right than Sully himself.
@@TPTGopher Correct. Hollywood butchers everything. Because real life is rather boring. They have to make up endless lies about how it happened, to make the movie remotely interesting.
Even though this movie paints the picture of those doing the investigation as the bad guys, the overall point is, it was just showing what Sully was thinking, and how he got out of the situation. Further more, I actually thought the dialogue in this movie from the Investigators didn't really look that bad. It was clearly showing it was their job. No outrageous yelling, and finger pointing. They displayed their side of how they thought he could have made it back to airport, they investigate every plane incident, this was nothing new. What was displayed here, looked understandable to me. Of course, Sully snapped back saying why he didn't want to risk it.
A little drama doesn't hurt anyone. You do need to make a case that was drawn out over hours on end, into something watchable. Besides, if this movie did go full drama, investigators would have looked like vengeful psychopaths with anger issues, making a big deal out nothing. Sully in the movie would have been shown as an emotional wreck, sobbing with the wife as if he got the death sentence, and cue dramatic music. Everyone in this film looked rather soft tensed due to some uncertainty, but no high emotions. Reasonably short movie, got to the point. It could have easily been blown way out of proportion and run 2.5 hours, but they didn't.
Agreed. Someone has to hold up a standard or baseline and maintain it through the investigation, if only to eventually prove how impossible it was to get back to an airport, and in the end, how remarkable it was.
A master's most valuable assets are his hands and his ability to accurately eyeball something
In reality, NTSB did not question the decision to land I n the Hudson.
bionicsjw didnt they?are u sure?it is their job to do so!i would be surprised if they didnt.
they did but they didn't interrogate him nor doubt him
That's a glider pilot right there. Then again I think he flew everything with wings.
I wish the NTSB would sue the producers of this movie for Slander.
?
Its not crashing its falling with style
Good 👁. I’ll fly with you eyeballing everything