Sully Movie CLIP - On the Hudson (2016) - Aaron Eckhart Movie
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 жов 2024
- Starring: Tom Hanks, Aaron Eckhart, Mike O'Malley, Jamey Sheridan, Anna Gunn
Sully Movie CLIP - On the Hudson (2016) - Aaron Eckhart Movie
The story of Chesley Sullenberger, who became a hero after gliding his plane along the water in the Hudson River, saving all of the airplane flights 155 crew and passengers.
Subscribe to COMING SOON: bit.ly/H2vZUn
Subscribe to TRAILERS: bit.ly/sxaw6h
Like us on FACEBOOK: bit.ly/1QyRMsE
Follow us on TWITTER: bit.ly/1ghOWmt
The Fandango MOVIECLIPS Coming Soon channel is the destination for movie clips, interviews, trailers, TV spots, behind-the-scenes videos, and all promo content for the hottest new movies. Fandango MOVIECLIPS Coming Soon has all the newest content in one place. Good luck getting any work done once you start poking around this channel. - Фільми й анімація
the combined power of thier mustaches saved the lives of 150 souls.
Never underestimate the power of a mustache.
God I love u broseph
🤣😂🤣😂🤣that’s funny
All hail the 'stache!
Thanks 😂
You either die a copilot or you live long enough to see yourself in a deposition.
"You can't give in...YOU CAN"T GIVE IN!!" LOL
I understood that reference.
"He was simply following the QRH"
Me: shut up Skylar
LOL XD
shut up shut up shut up T_T
She wanted to go swimming with them
She says not knowing that a) he turned the APU on before they pulled the QRH and b) that turning on the APU isn't actually ON the QRH. She was guessing.
The video before this one was of Skylar as the bimbo accountant in Breaking Bad true story 😅
damn that mustache is glorious
Oh, if only Harvey Dent had that moustache too...
and Christian Bale...
The mustache is only surpassed by the glutes on his chin 😍
but which one... which ONE
Yeah, I wish Aaron Eckhart kept that for the long run.
In the actual investigation of flight 1549, the NTSB was totally professional and understanding towards the pilots (even Captain Sullenberger and First Officer Skiles praised the NTSB investigation).
The chief investigator Robert Benson is a former Air Force pilot and airline pilot and had flown the A320 himself and quickly concluded through flight test simulations that ditching the aircraft in the River Hudson was the correct decision, its very rare the NTSB gets the wrong conclusion to an accident or incident their usually very professional.
Yes, but then you wouldn't have a movie.
*They’re(as in they’are)
Eckhart doesn't get even half the credit he deserves as an actor.
I see what you did there o_O
It's about what's fair!
The only only unfair thing is his mustache: it’s unfair because none of us will ever have a beauty like that....
"ON the Hudson River." Hahaha well played
Thats some damn fine loyalty to his captain
This needs to be repeated everyone so often. In real life, the investigators did none of this. They pegged Sully as a hero pretty damned fast. All of this is nonsense just to have some drama in the movie.
In the real investigation, the NTSB very quick determined the aircraft was brought down by a bird strike, their wasn't any attempt to blame the pilots from the start.
I suspect the reason we got Flight (2012) is that Sully is just too darn mature and competent so they had to create a fictionalised event.
If they could've done a 180 and landed back on the runway, it would have been much safer than a water landing. Initial simulations suggested they did have enough momentum and altitude to turn around, so there was a serious investigation into whether the right choice was made.
Eventually they found that Sully was right. By the time they were ready to make the decision (checked the plane's systems and made the mayday call), they'd lost too much height to turn round.
@@st0rmforce they addressed that in the movie. They could have made it back if they started to turn towards the airport immediately after the bird strike. No reaction time, no calling ATC, just turn and hope you don’t hit another plane.
@@whatisgoingonherebruh1 What I meant was that there had to be a full investigation to make sure the right choice had been made. Lets say there was a tiny bit of thrust from an engine, or they were higher when they hit the birds, or something like that, then a turnaround could have been possible. It didn't need to be a tight turn if they had enough hight.
IF it was possible to safely turn around, an emergency landing on the ground would definitely be safer than on water. Listen to Sully and Jeff talk about how risky it was. Water landings are dangerous, no matter how calm the water is.
If he'd miscalculated and there was enough margin to turn around, then in choosing the river he needlessly endangered everybody.
So they had to make sure he'd made the right choice. And everyone agreed that he had.
What's most impressive about that whole thing is how the plane didn't sink as soon as it hit the water.
The mass of those two guys testicles would almost certainly cause a lesser plane to sink like a rock.
It's design to float as long as the hull is intact
@@johnwhite5897 this is true, but enough mass will sink anything. And let's face it, the combined mass of those two men's testicles adds up to a very large number. So i was impressed the plane could float
@@johnwhite5897 r/whooosh
Yeah a 737-800 would have submerged instantly
Testicles float
One of the main factors why all the passengers survived was that the a320 was able to land on a water surface and to stay floating for about 30 mins, Airbus made the aircraft that way. A normal aircraft would sink much quicker, this was never mentioned in the film.
I'm not sure if "a normal aircraft would sink much quicker" - I've never heard of a valid comparison being made. But it is certain that if a passenger hadn't opened one of the rear doors allowing river water to flow into the cabin then the a/c would have stayed afloat for even longer. Also, even though the initial impact caused superficial damage to the belly, the a/c's fuselage didn't rupture, and that structural integrity ensured prolonged buoyancy. Broken metal tubes sink rapidly.
The real lesson of flight 1549 is that the FAA should require all pilots to grow a mustache.
it's brilliant because i haven't seen this movie but the more I look, the more actors I recognise.
Turning on the APU is 15th on the list. They'd definitely have been dead had he followed procedure from the QRH.
Kelly Rayburn Which, in the Air Crash Investigations episode, the real woman Skylar is based on goes out of her way to confirm.
Why is that? I am not second-guessing you, not at all. I just wish to understand, thats all.
@@roadwarrior144 Loss of both engines checklist was made for 20000ft of altitude to start with - following up a single engine loss in cruise altitude. They encountered the birds at around 2800ft.
Sylvia Divinora Yes, all of that makes sense, but in the event of the loss of both engines, why is activating the APU 15th? If you loose both engines, why not start the APU first, because it will provide electrical power to communications and hydraulic pumps to control the aircraft.
I wonder, is it because the air-driven generator is deployed first, and the next task is focused on re-starting the engines? If so, that would explain why, in another clip, Skyles was reading off the checklist and said “optimum re-light speed: 300 knots.”
@@roadwarrior144 yes, relight speed relates to restart engines, the RAT comes out immediately and provides hydraulics and electrics. I think the APU is no emergency equipment on Airbus, takes minutes to run it all up. I think it is really mainly intended for ground operations and to give a tiny extra of takeoff power in hot and high conditions - taking over pneumatics (bleed air for A/C) and electrics from the engines
ON the Hudson river!!!!!
"He was not following the QRH Skylar, I HAD THE QRH. A pilot follows the QRH and crashes and you think that of him? No, he IS the one who KNOWS."
Skylar, Harvey dent, and Forrest Gump in one scene
Imagine almost dying, coming to terms with and then having to be interviewed by the NTSB. (Although in real life the NTSB wasn't quite so bad).
Sully had to land the plane with the wings perfectly aligned with the water surface, otherwise one engine would have hit the water slightly earlier, the plane would have rotated and broken apart. What is impressive though is he managed to compensate for Jeff's moustache during the maneuver.
He actually used Jeff's moustache as an extra flap during the landing.
I mean yeah, but seeing as how the equipment tells you if the plane is level or not that’s not the impressive part.
That mustache is the reason all those passengers are still alive.
forget the investigation... god damn that mustache looks amazing!
Turning on the APU is the 15th thing on that list!
No No No - our moustaches landed that damn plane!
'I am drunk '
'I was drunk'
I'd take Sully's eyeballing it over any yahoo's calculations any day.....1000's of flights - 40 years. Do the math!
I hope after a long hard day of work, Anna Gunn drives home, gets into her house, smells dinner cooking, walks into the kitchen and says "Oh wow, thanks for starting dinner honey, can I help?" and her husband turns, looks her right in the face and says "Shut up Skylar."
Why does this feel it's "damned if you do and damned if you don't" with this situation? He landed the plane of the Hudson river and saved the people on board from years of experience and not following the rules and they're not happy and finding fault. But if he did follow the rules and they ended up crashing, causing the lives of hundreds of people, they still would have found fault and blame the pilot.
Actually, no. They would blame Airbus and their inconsistent manual. It has happened before with Boeing. Even though the movie portrays NTSB as villains they are extreme professionals
Watch the Mayday episode concerning the Hudson incident
Maybe you should read about the actual investigation rather than the movie portrayal of it. Eastwood's script made the NTSB guys out to be assholes, cos it made for more drama. Even Sully asked for the script to be changed, and not include the real names of NTSB people because it did not portray them properly. The real investigator in charge, a guy called Benzon was actually a former US Air pilot, and had previously flown the very plane that Sully and Skiles landed on the Hudson. Benzon also personally tried the simulations and concluded that Sully made the right call because the chances of making it back to La Guardia were not good enough. If portrayed more realistically then the movie would have had one major point of drama - the birdstrike and landing, and then just the grinding process of a drawn out inquiry.
From what I've heard the movie plays up the investigation side of things for dramatic effect, and in reality this wasn't nearly as antagonistic as it's shown in the movie. The investigation did happen, and part of that was going into detail of every decision made in the cockpit to understand what happened and how it could have been improved, but the intention of the process wasn't to villify Sully, but rather to understand what happened and how we can better react to similar situations in the future. Yes, this involved playing Devil's advocate on a lot of decisions made, but again from what I've heard I think everybody was on the same page of what the purpose was.
Serenity113 a
Investigators are so smart
Harvey!!!
It's not about what I want, it's about what's *FAIR!*
It's amazing when ever i see her all i hear is
I GAVE THE MONEY TO TED
Ahh. So now I know what happened to Walter whites wife after BB!
I still don't get why they were so hostile towards him. He saved lives, leave it be.
This isn't what happened in reality
Didnt play out this way. It was a lot less dramatic.
It’s frustrating how naive people are when they see this movie. Most of this didn’t happen.
Because it's a movie. And that's what happens in movies that try cashing in on real life situations.
's why i dont like this movie.
In any actual emergency, a man only has himself and God
Sometimes, you have to break the rules in order to save lives.
The Government oversight committee.. always has a panel that that couldn't pick their nose without poking themselves in the eye.
In movies, sure. In reality these people are indispensible.
"these guys don't listen to me. boo hoo. =
That's why they make rules,,,,,,, so you can break them and come away alive. Way to go Captain Sully, you ole steely eyed pilot you.
There’s only two people who were in the cockpit that day, and I’d like to thank them both for smoking.
Who was his. Co-- pilot the actor???
Two face
Aaron Eckhart is the actor's name.
SKYLAR!!!!
Why is it such a big deal? No lives were lost, no any other damage was done other then the plane going in the Hudson, but I guess human lives and hundreds of millions of dollars in property damages and lawsuits pale in comparison
All my 5 chidren are so scared to take planes after seeing this plane crash
it wasn't a crash
It’s a water landing
a FORCED water landing.
All 5 of your children need proper education then its safer to fly than use a bicycle lol
Dear lord don’t them see Flight!!
process orientated workforce ......oh yes really?
Irl they prolly just says gj bro
I’m sorry, but this is a TOM HANKS movie
Returning to La Guardia would've worked.
Captain Sully just got lucky landing in the Hudson.
Skylar still meddling, I see.
To everyone complaining about how the investigators were super nice, understanding, and professional in real life. Seriously, we get it. But that makes for a boring @$$ movie. Unfortunately you can't make a 5 minute forced water landing last for an hour and a half. GET OVER IT!
first