The Secrets of The Fifth Element Explained

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 лип 2024
  • Today we start a new series in which we examines the hidden themes in films. I've long wanted to do a video on The Fifth Element and so the series begins with this fun sci-fi classic.
    FACEBOOK: / generationfilms
    TikTok: / generationfilms
    INSTAGRAM: / thegenerationfilms
    FOLLOW OUR HOSTS
    American Ben: / @americanbenjamin
    Allen Xie: / thebeardedasianman
    Ben Hedges: / benhedgesntd
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 570

  • @GenerationFilms
    @GenerationFilms  3 роки тому +64

    What other films should I dig into? (Don't you dare say "Holes" fellow Dad jokers out there)

    • @christenorio9555
      @christenorio9555 3 роки тому +2

      I want an fifth element TV show franchise of leading up to the movie

    • @christenorio9555
      @christenorio9555 3 роки тому +1

      Earth fire wind water with the fifth element is heart an modernize version of captain planet or avatar the last airbender cartoon tv series

    • @Sidekick_Snowman
      @Sidekick_Snowman 3 роки тому +3

      Men in Black please!

    • @Aezeus
      @Aezeus 3 роки тому +1

      Holes is good

    • @thicklydelicious
      @thicklydelicious 3 роки тому +2

      Dark City

  • @Deimos001
    @Deimos001 3 роки тому +149

    Man the performance of gary oldman in this film is 10/10
    He's a really awesome actor

    • @pruje
      @pruje 3 роки тому +9

      He might be the most underrated actor in modern history. He is versatile AF.

    • @Deimos001
      @Deimos001 3 роки тому +1

      @@pruje true,he is an chameleon, he fits the role as if it was made for him.

    • @WickedPrince3D
      @WickedPrince3D 3 роки тому +3

      Watch Bram Stoker's Dracula; he plays Dracula. An incredible interpretation made awesome mostly by his portrayal of Dracula.

    • @Deimos001
      @Deimos001 3 роки тому

      Already watched and yes he is an amazing actor.

    • @WickedPrince3D
      @WickedPrince3D 3 роки тому

      @@Deimos001 The film is old enough you never know who has seen it anymore. His passion for his character in that movie was so great I almost wanted to root for him even though he was the villain. And his ability to transition from the Warrior to the ancient and frightening old man to the handsome Modern Man was incredible.

  • @OdariArt
    @OdariArt 3 роки тому +81

    The Fifth Element is a live-action anime. I love the fact that Tommy 'Tiny' Lister is the president.

    • @jakeaurod
      @jakeaurod 3 роки тому +3

      I read somewhere that it use the comic book aesthetic of France, not Japan.

    • @UGNAvalon
      @UGNAvalon 3 роки тому +2

      @Jake Aurod - So, Valerian?

    • @Hopscotchlemonadespritz
      @Hopscotchlemonadespritz 3 роки тому +1

      That's what it is! I couldn't put my finger on it... Fifth Element was released a year two ahead of my discovery of Anime.

    • @WildeFyre69
      @WildeFyre69 3 роки тому +4

      He was a great actor and a decent fellow. RIP. Also, my favorite movie of all time :)

    • @Solarsystemrdffdfyyhh
      @Solarsystemrdffdfyyhh 3 роки тому +2

      Debo

  • @garygauvin5933
    @garygauvin5933 3 роки тому +94

    I always see Lilu as just another vessel, just like the 4 stones, she needed to be activated by a sample of the element. In her case the 5th element (love)

    • @ricoy.9258
      @ricoy.9258 2 роки тому +15

      Earth, Fire, Wind, Water, HEART

    • @cobaltplasma
      @cobaltplasma 2 роки тому +4

      Maybe you could even say that the element of love is used as the direct foil to its opposite, a sort of 6th element: Hate. You'd have a sort of pyramid / inverted pyramid, the base of the 4 elements being a simple square until the diametrically opposed 5th and 6th elements are brought to bear, creating the pyramids of equal, yet opposing force.

    • @Powerhaus88
      @Powerhaus88 2 роки тому +1

      @@ricoy.9258 GOOO PLANET

  • @rockyperez6668
    @rockyperez6668 3 роки тому +144

    The part where Tucker's character Ruby Rhod walks by Bruce Willis and then spins to give him a crazy look always makes me chuckle. 😂

    • @donaldsmith8648
      @donaldsmith8648 3 роки тому +7

      Chris Tucker is hilarious threw out the film 😆

    • @danielm6049
      @danielm6049 3 роки тому +4

      Yeah, that and the attempted mugging...

    • @coletaylor725
      @coletaylor725 3 роки тому +2

      Tuckers character.. in a way, half made the movie, but this was a solid af movie imo on its own.

    • @lando8913
      @lando8913 3 роки тому +4

      They must have cracked up a ton during filming. The most challenging thing for Bruce to film probably wasn't the stunts and action, it was staying completely stoic while Chris Tucker is in a rose covered dress being.. well, Chris Tucker.

    • @righty-o3585
      @righty-o3585 3 роки тому +4

      The part where Corbin gives Ruby the blaster against the Mangalore head laying on the ground...... And Corbin accidently scares the shit out of Ruby who shoots the Mangalore in the face lol that part makes me laugh every single time 😂

  • @bradygainz
    @bradygainz 3 роки тому +138

    Yes the fifth element is truly a damn good film

    • @superomegaprimemk2
      @superomegaprimemk2 3 роки тому +6

      It's a real shame Hollywood has stopped making such films, these days it's got to be a brand or apart of a shared Universe while trying to push a outdated manner of thinking!!

    • @Riceball01
      @Riceball01 3 роки тому +2

      @@superomegaprimemk2 The reason being is that the costs of making movies has become exorbitant and a s result, the big studios have become risk adverse and thus rather stick to things that they think will pretty much be a safe bet. That, and the international market, China in particular, has really become a big part of Hollywood's movie making strategy, which is why there are so many reboots, they're old to us but new to the Chinese and other people overseas. It's also why a lot of big movies these days are big on action and short on story, because action translates universally across all languages.

  • @chrisvandick591
    @chrisvandick591 3 роки тому +28

    This is one of the most underrated movies of the 90s, thanks for the breakdown. Well done...

  • @Jayjay-qe6um
    @Jayjay-qe6um 3 роки тому +232

    The most important thing I like about this movie, NO SEQUELS.

    • @stevenwilliams1805
      @stevenwilliams1805 3 роки тому +10

      Perfect as is.

    • @Jason-jb3xt
      @Jason-jb3xt 3 роки тому +28

      Apparently the writer wrote the outline as a 3 parter similar to lotr but the but the studio didnt want it. Sequels are generally fine if the are written together imo.

    • @Shervin86
      @Shervin86 3 роки тому +9

      Ya 6th element would have sucked.

    • @gamingchamp6728
      @gamingchamp6728 3 роки тому +4

      @@Shervin86 let alone 7th element

    • @4OrCE1on
      @4OrCE1on 3 роки тому

      Amen

  • @howardbabcom
    @howardbabcom 3 роки тому +44

    Cornelius is more 'passive' because his role was to protect the secret (Like his predecessors) concerning the weapon until the Montigewans return it to earth for use. That plan appears to go pear-shaped thanks to Zorg and co, but the forces of good have already jumped ahead of what he's up to, so the one unexpected 'element' in the story is Corbyn Dallas, who chooses to side with Lilu for the oldest reason in the book (surely, the reason for life) - love, which ends up saving the universe. The 'big' themes of the story really revolve around that. There's a wonderful line when Zorg's goons arrive at Conrelius' residence and he opens the door to them and asks "Weddings?', repeating what he said to Corbyn when he arrives with Lilu. Actually, that's the key - the 'marriage' had already taken place between these two because of what had unfolded in the cab (as Corbyn declares in his call to his buddy)... the rest, as they say is merely icing the cake.

    • @rahulshah1408
      @rahulshah1408 Рік тому +2

      I would like to add Corbyn was a soldier. A man who excelled at destroying and tired of it. He loved life after falling in love with Lelu. He shared his epiphany.
      Time, wisdom , and love moves “evil” to “good”.

  • @Robo5apien
    @Robo5apien 3 роки тому +23

    The main human protagonist and main human antagonist never know of the others existence. Love that and your content, stay safe.

    • @DeathBYDesign666
      @DeathBYDesign666 3 роки тому +6

      Actually they do, remember Dallas was employed by Zorg and Zorg has one of his henchmen try to steal Dallas's identity to get on the ship. I think you mean they never meet face to face, but both definitely do know of each other.

    • @Robo5apien
      @Robo5apien 3 роки тому

      @@DeathBYDesign666 I forgot about that

  • @jaspr1999
    @jaspr1999 3 роки тому +16

    What I find interesting is the very first murder of the movie... The archaeologist, killed by the Mondochiwans. They killed an unarmed man, for absolutely no reason. The priest was trying to kill the guy as well by poisoning the water. If evil begets evil, then the movie starts off with an act that would be considered evil. This is even acknowledged by the assistant who called them monsters. At what point does an evil act lead to an act to preserve good? Leeloo fights, but it's unknown if she actually killed anyone. The beam of light from her at the end may not have been a weapon by definition but more of an equal opposite just neutralizing the evil and not destroying it. Similar to baking soda in hydrochloric acid. Making something inert is not destruction.

    • @keevansixx4185
      @keevansixx4185 3 роки тому +7

      ok, interesting take...too bad every word of your premise is entirely wrong. the old priest was going to drug them (not poison) to sleep so they would not see the arrival of the Mondochiwans {you would know this, if you read the book released with the movie all those years ago} (priests aren't exactly known as blatant murderous bastards throughout history....extreme buggerers...yes, cold blooded killers...no). the Archeologist was not killed, just rendered unconscious by the advanced superior technology of the mondochiwans. During the first 45 minutes of the film, it was established that the mondochiwans were an extremely peaceful race that abhorred violence as a solution, so why in the hell would they, an actively peaceful race, resort to murder when their technology was extremely capable of incapacitating (not murdering) a lifeform into unconsciousness. they made the old fart professor faint into unconsciousness with a little red light. the first act of violence in the film was when billy pulled the german pistol, and accidentally fired it when he tripped backwards on the dig site gear causing the large metal weeble wobble alien to get pancaked into the door. seriously? that's what you took away from watching the movie? it's like we watched two entirely different movies...

    • @jaspr1999
      @jaspr1999 3 роки тому +5

      @@keevansixx4185 - You read the book. Cool. I have not done so and only have the movie to go by. As the priest prayed for forgiveness prior to pouring the contents of the flask into the cup and the assistance yelling, "They killed the professor! They're monsters." There is nothing in that scene indicating that the professor is alive. Now if there is something I missed in my memory about that specific scene to indicate otherwise I would love to know.

    • @keevansixx4185
      @keevansixx4185 3 роки тому +3

      @@jaspr1999 ok, then....when the priest prayed for forgiveness, it was because he was about to commit a dishonorable act against a close friend (as per the book), which, in old middle eastern cultures was considered a very bad thing in the eyes of their gods, and your entire argument was struck down when the mondochiwan commander stated "time is not important, only life is important." before getting pancaked in the wall. a species who values the concept of protecting life above all else, would not randomly off some curious old guy just because he happened to stumble across their super secret squirrel snack chamber. They were the superior technologically advanced civilization appearing in a, to them, primitive backwater planet full of life where they chose to hide their ultimate weapon against evil. (plus the book describes the knockout act as a neural disruption beam to pacify hostile forces by basically putting them to sleep....) The professor didn't die, he was put to sleep for his own safety, and Billy reacted with that very human attribute of "overreact, jump to conclusions, and shoot first" You know how i know the professor didn't die? the book that the priest Vito Cornellius reads from and shows pages to the prez was partially written using the archeologists notes and panel drawings from billy (if you have a really good hi-def 4k tv, and a great player you can pause/advance on pages of the open book to see the signatures of both the professor and billy on certain pages) . they contributed to the sum of knowledge of that religious order...hell, they were probably recruited after that incident INTO the order to protect the secrets, but mostly, your premise died when the mondo said "time is not important, only life is important."

    • @jaspr1999
      @jaspr1999 3 роки тому +4

      @@keevansixx4185 Fair enough. However, I still stand by my statement about the scene as there is nothing that says the Archaeologist lived. While I appreciate your view, reading the book would drastically change my perspective. Because of you, I probably will as it sounds awesome!

    • @keevansixx4185
      @keevansixx4185 3 роки тому +3

      @@jaspr1999 the book is good, it fills in A LOT of the missing backstory, and reasons for everyone doing everything. The movie was a glossover camp fest which made it great, and the book just fills in all the gritty realism that was missing in the film. I think the most disturbing implication in the book, was the concept of how cheap a life had become. like how a criminal would be killed, slapped into a tube, rushed to a nucleo lab, rebuilt, only to be executed again as part of their punishment, lather, rinse, repeat. It was sad dystopian futurism with a dash of glam. that's why the movie is so good, all the ugly is painted over with garrish lifestyles, excessive architecture, and a false sense of opulence that thinly veneers the societal rot underneath.

  • @IchigoKurosaki_
    @IchigoKurosaki_ 3 роки тому +17

    "I am a meat popsicle"

  • @davidjuby7392
    @davidjuby7392 3 роки тому +34

    it was never a weapon. In the classic yin yang symbol at the point where one color is strongest is the point where the other color starts. The five symbolic elements were not a weapon but just the spark for change. The great evil is not killed but shows up some where else where the great good is at its strongest and the cycle continues

    • @darthhodges
      @darthhodges 3 роки тому +9

      In the beginning of the movie they did say it was a cycle lasting 5000 years. What they didn't ever cover was that if evil "won" and all life was destroyed would some "good" force appear 5000 years later and attempt to bring life again? If so it would certainly reinforce the idea that both forces must exist in balance.

    • @davidjuby7392
      @davidjuby7392 3 роки тому

      @@darthhodges interesting, thanks

    • @gregthomson2299
      @gregthomson2299 10 місяців тому

      The book goes into a lot more detail and is really worth a look.

  • @philiphendersonjr1760
    @philiphendersonjr1760 3 роки тому +23

    Almost didn't recognize you after the haircut and shave!

  • @ChickSage
    @ChickSage 3 роки тому +44

    Let me play Devil's advocate, here :) Not attacking the evil mass was the right call. You can't defend yourself, unless you're being attacked. Rather than listening to the priest, they decided to attack the evil mass without provocation, and as a result, their battleship and all her hands were incinerated.
    In response to your 5th element weapon question, the difference could be that the 5th element weapon only works against the evil mass, whereas the evil mass weapon has no such restrictions and can destroy anything.
    Of course he saved Zorg, it isn't for the priest to decide who is or isn't worthy to live. Do you think the priest should let everything die, just in case it tries to do something evil, in the future? It seems obvious that saving Zorg's life was a life saving action. Zorg can't change his ways and do the right thing, if the priest lets him die. Of course, Zorg isn't going to do the right thing, but the Priest doesn't know that, so he saves his life, as the potential first step toward saving Zorg's soul, it seems.
    peace

    • @darthhodges
      @darthhodges 3 роки тому +5

      I agree. Morals aren't moral if you can't apply them on both large and small scales. If something is wrong in the small scale but right in the large scale (letting Zorg die) then it's still wrong. Most of these supposed paradoxes are resolved if you acknowledge that free will (or liberty) is a right. If Zorg dies he no longer has the choice to do right or wrong. Willfully denying him that choice is wrong unless you have been specifically authorized by society to punish those who break the law.

    • @markuhler2664
      @markuhler2664 3 роки тому +3

      Excellently said. Especially liked you using the term Devil's Advocate, given how you point out the priest needs to save Oldman's life to give him a chance to redeem himself.

    • @neepsmcfly4176
      @neepsmcfly4176 2 роки тому +2

      Mega-points for Chick but I gotta giggle a little after reading AJ's response. As if society somehow is the great moral adjudicator. Society's laws create it's own mixed bag of paradoxes... the easiest example here being govmnt sponsored murder. it's also a shame we have such difficulty separating a strong moral code from organized religion. If that were possible, he could've let zorg die without the need for govmnt blessing or fear of angering an uninterested god... just walk away recognizing the countless lives that will never know they were saved by a cherry.... and a man brave enough to walk away.
      On Zorg's right to do good.... well, he would've had many opportunities before that and, well, he preached his moral code. "Live by the sword, die by the pit" seems true enough to me.

    • @gregthomson2299
      @gregthomson2299 10 місяців тому

      @@neepsmcfly4176doing what you believe to be the right thing (not letting zorg choke to death) doesn’t have to be related to religious beliefs, personal ones could cause you to act the same way. As could self preservation, he probably wouldn’t have been able to leave the place alive if he came out of the meeting with Zorg dead. (I doubt the “he choked on a cheery explanation would be believed). Saving him was, imo, the right thing to do and I’m not religious. I just think all life has value. Would I have let him choke? Probably, even though I believe saving him was “right”. That probably shows, by my standards, I’m far from perfect. I continue to try to live up to my values through (often failing). I don’t believe in heaven or being rewarded for good deeds when I pass, more just to be proud of what I see in the mirror with regards my values. (Sorry, am probably not explaining myself very articulately).

    • @neepsmcfly4176
      @neepsmcfly4176 10 місяців тому

      @@gregthomson2299 Actually, I think you did a fine job of making your point. And to most all your points, I can understand is not outright agree w them (faults and all). In fact, given your supremely honest and brave expose' I've got half a mind to simply express my belief that you're on the right track and to leave us nimrods in yt comments before it stains your soul (bc it will). Regrettably, my gift (curse) of debate (in the interest of lessons in perspective, seldom just for the win... depending on the topic and # of consumed beers) forces me to remind you that he WAS a monkish leader of a religious sect whose goal was to protect the 5th hottie, er, element. It's true that as a general statement, religion needn't be your only motivation to make the ethical choice. I'm actually a bit perplexed on this side of the explanations since, as an atheist I'm typically making your self same argument.
      Nonetheless, keeping on topic, he does make some dogmatic references as well so I'd be pretty comfortable w betting that even if his personal morals made him take action, his moral code was influenced in a major way by the scriptures he surrounded himself with on a daily basis.
      It's just a movie, though. It's nice to know, though, that even if you think I wronged you, there's a good possibility you won't just let me die.

  • @michaelhowell2326
    @michaelhowell2326 3 роки тому +34

    The Fifth Element and Starship Troopers are my favorite movies of all time I think. I watch them every time I have an opportunity.

    • @Alex-hd9ef
      @Alex-hd9ef 3 роки тому +6

      I prefer the book starship troopers infinitely more. When I watch the movie I can instantly see the director’s bias

    • @Jason-jb3xt
      @Jason-jb3xt 3 роки тому +1

      @@Alex-hd9ef i listened to the audio book recently and damn it was good

    • @user-sg9mg6cn2c
      @user-sg9mg6cn2c 3 роки тому +1

      Galaxy Quest should be on that list.😁

    • @khalood4584
      @khalood4584 3 роки тому

      Stargate too

  • @MarvelX42
    @MarvelX42 3 роки тому +9

    I love that the fifth element is love.

  • @kellyrk2007
    @kellyrk2007 3 роки тому +52

    The Fifth Element is a Live-Action HEAVY METAL story.

    • @jonnyq680
      @jonnyq680 3 роки тому +3

      I'LL BUY THAT FOR A DOLLAR!

    • @philvanderlaan5942
      @philvanderlaan5942 3 роки тому +1

      @@jonnyq680 no that’s Running Man

    • @jonnyq680
      @jonnyq680 3 роки тому +1

      @@philvanderlaan5942 perhaps Robocop?

    • @philvanderlaan5942
      @philvanderlaan5942 3 роки тому

      @@jonnyq680 ok I'm wrong to quote. '. CinemaSins CinemaSins'. we’re not film critics , we’re @$$holes

    • @tristramcox4615
      @tristramcox4615 3 роки тому

      @@jonnyq680 facts

  • @barnettmcgowan8978
    @barnettmcgowan8978 3 роки тому +33

    I loved the Fifth Element when it came out, and I think it stands the test of time. It was a fun ride that didn't take itself too seriously. Nice video.

  • @mechtheist
    @mechtheist 3 роки тому +10

    In the creation/destruction balance and life thing, was there any mention of the basic fact that life eats life, most living organisms can _only_ live by killing and ingesting other organisms

  • @coletaylor725
    @coletaylor725 3 роки тому +4

    :O "Mr. Rhod!"
    "You can call me Ruby"
    XD

  • @kitdesilva
    @kitdesilva 3 роки тому +21

    I bought the DVD like 20 years ago, watched it lots of times. Totally unlike other hollywood garbage, it's actually funny & entertaining. Here in australia, TV channel "SBS" occasionally goes berserk & shows it continuously all day on one of their channels.

    • @pattiwilliams6765
      @pattiwilliams6765 3 роки тому +1

      And they’ve done it again over the last couple of days, and even though I too have owned it on DVD for years, I still binge watch on SBS...I’m wondering if they’re sending a message to the world.. LOVE....is the 5th element.

    • @willy-johndejager6810
      @willy-johndejager6810 3 роки тому

      hi patti.willy from namibia, gday! australia i want to visit.

    • @Thor-Orion
      @Thor-Orion 2 роки тому

      This is not really a Hollywood film.

  • @danielbloomquist9810
    @danielbloomquist9810 3 роки тому +7

    Smashing, gents. The only flaw in this video is a deficiency of Ruby Rhod, which is okay because it opens the door for the follow up video focusing squarely on how super green he is. Love your stuff.

  • @nicolaiveliki1409
    @nicolaiveliki1409 3 роки тому +20

    Father Cornelius is almost comically pacifistic, except for when he smashes Corben's trophy over his head... also Corben looks like he's from Florida with the frosted tips. Zork is also comically evil, but somehow it all just fits together. The Film itself is oddly well balanced

    • @GenerationFilms
      @GenerationFilms  3 роки тому +3

      Good call on Cornelius' hitting Dallas! Didn't think of that.

  • @realironballs
    @realironballs 3 роки тому +30

    I for one don't support the idea of making a direct sequel to this movie, but it would be cool to see some stories that are set in that universe. This film must NEVER be put through the reboot-atron!!!

    • @sasquatchteam420
      @sasquatchteam420 3 роки тому +3

      Rebooting films does usually ruin them 😂

    • @JSwanKilowJ
      @JSwanKilowJ 3 роки тому

      well...Valerian.....

    • @MadSpaceWolfDiary
      @MadSpaceWolfDiary 3 роки тому +1

      It was planned. The concept art and some genral story beats came from one of the founding artists of Heavy Metal magazine, Mobius. They had a larger scope in mind during development to cover other worlds and stories. Shame it never became a featured graphic novel.

  • @PerTrygveMyhrer
    @PerTrygveMyhrer 3 роки тому +6

    I do wonder how that alien singer was supposed to deliver those stones.

    • @TriMarkC
      @TriMarkC 3 роки тому +1

      I’ve always wondered that too!
      Maybe she was like “My Alien” or “The Thing” & can split open/

    • @TheWelshDwarf
      @TheWelshDwarf 3 роки тому

      I think that she knew she was going to die (hence the fact that there was only ever going to be one performance). Cornelius was black and white, the Mondoshawan are far more pragmatic about things (hence the fate that befalls the archaeologist at the start of the movie). Leeloo was on her first outing in forever and as such was a blank slate, hence the disillusionment.

    • @gregthomson2299
      @gregthomson2299 10 місяців тому

      Alien enema’s are really strong (apparently).

  • @MissMalevolent
    @MissMalevolent 3 роки тому +66

    Ben looks like a whole new man after the removal of the C ovid beard/hair.

    • @Shatterverse
      @Shatterverse 3 роки тому +2

      Yeah that scragle was threatening to murder him in his sleep.

    • @sir_ridley3886
      @sir_ridley3886 3 роки тому +1

      Didn't notice till about 6 minutes into the video

    • @jaymanla
      @jaymanla 3 роки тому

      Didn’t realize how handsome he is with all that scruff on his head 😊

  • @Hopscotchlemonadespritz
    @Hopscotchlemonadespritz 3 роки тому +5

    Glad you focused on Cornelius and Zorg's dialog! It's the most important scene in the film, if not it's most awe-inspired or entertaining:
    We get a playfully nuanced interpretation of destruction and creation, not only the barebones contrast of evil vs. good. This pair of veteran actors have a little fun; Oldman adopting an implacable accent in his oddest characterisation.

  • @morlath4767
    @morlath4767 3 роки тому +31

    So what you're saying is that the Fifth Element is a thesis on the reality and need for Grey Jedi against the blind extremism of Jedi and Sith Orders?

  • @mrmacguff1n
    @mrmacguff1n 3 роки тому +37

    I can't be the only one who never realized Vito Cornelius was played by the original Bilbo, Ian Holm

    • @DLordSadow
      @DLordSadow 3 роки тому +2

      Yes, God rest his soul. 😞

    • @MrHadenhenson
      @MrHadenhenson 3 роки тому +4

      Totally didn't notice until you just now brought it to my attention

    • @slckb0y65
      @slckb0y65 3 роки тому +6

      wanna hear a better one ? the moment you realise he's also Ash the android from alien ;)

    • @mrmacguff1n
      @mrmacguff1n 3 роки тому

      @@slckb0y65 shut up right now lol

    • @dudeguy8686
      @dudeguy8686 3 роки тому +1

      For year i've been wondering where i recognized him from, thanks for that

  • @vectorshaman338
    @vectorshaman338 2 роки тому +5

    Always loved that movie, also one of the few movies where the good guy and the bad guy not only never meet each other, they don't even know they exist.

  • @Janoha17
    @Janoha17 3 роки тому +6

    Saving Zorg keeps the Great Evil at bay because Mr. Shadow was relying on Zorg to recover the Elements. Letting Zorg die there would have gotten the Great Evil to accelerate, like it did when Zorg died and Corben got the Elements.

  • @PeanutStrawberry
    @PeanutStrawberry 3 роки тому +11

    Yin and yang, negative and positive, passive and active, creation and destruction; all found in one another, interconnected, interdependent.

  • @RGSneaker
    @RGSneaker Рік тому +1

    In my opinion, Leeloo is not refusing to help in the scene before she "takes care of evil". She educates Corben for him to reach the correct conclusion. They both know 'Love' but Corben needed to know how important it is.

  • @cannoneer155mm
    @cannoneer155mm 3 роки тому +6

    The Fifth Element or Die Hard in Space.

  • @robkemp598
    @robkemp598 3 роки тому +7

    Leelo is a sanctioned Xeno........ She has a multipass

    • @nobleman9393
      @nobleman9393 3 роки тому

      lol no, you are a Heretic

    • @UGNAvalon
      @UGNAvalon 3 роки тому

      Desperate times call for desperate alliances when fighting the Ruinous Powers.

  • @joeguy5989
    @joeguy5989 3 роки тому +2

    I never get sick of watching this movie over and over again.

  • @JBrace78
    @JBrace78 3 роки тому +3

    Very interesting perspective. I picked up on many of those subtle nuances in the countless times I've watched The Fifth Element (one of my all time favorite films) but you managed to point out at least a few that I hadn't caught before. Well done!

  • @GohnwithaG
    @GohnwithaG 3 роки тому +4

    Ruby Rhod is my spirit animal

  • @ryanhayes68
    @ryanhayes68 3 роки тому +2

    Awesome video as always and you have again made me think more about the underlying themes of one of my favorite movies from childhood. 👍

  • @alexjessop5330
    @alexjessop5330 Місяць тому +1

    rewatching it. It was better than I remembered. It really was 90's Guardians of the Galaxy.

  • @moreenpackard6897
    @moreenpackard6897 3 роки тому +3

    BEN got a haircut ??? THANK GOD !!!

  • @mcrande
    @mcrande 3 роки тому +14

    I'm glad that you loved my documentary everything that you saw happened and it was real. We did not use any CGI and it was not scripted.

    • @KazzArie
      @KazzArie 3 роки тому +2

      Korbeeen dallaaaaaas

    • @robbietorkelsonn8509
      @robbietorkelsonn8509 3 роки тому +1

      @@KazzArie almost true, except the entire movie was filmed on set and no real scenery is used in here

    • @keirfarnum6811
      @keirfarnum6811 3 роки тому

      How’s piloting that cab? Where was that filmed? Not on earth!

    • @mcrande
      @mcrande 3 роки тому

      @@keirfarnum6811 That was in New York it was crazy for me I was flying on pure instinct.

    • @Thor-Orion
      @Thor-Orion 2 роки тому

      Pretty sure it’s spelled Corbyn

  • @jonmcgee6987
    @jonmcgee6987 3 роки тому +1

    Been a few years since i last watched it. Clearly time to take it off the shelf and watch it again.

  • @erikswenson2659
    @erikswenson2659 3 роки тому +4

    For what it is worth, Zorg is often shown with a halo around his head in the form of a glowing blue circle or golden round portal behind him.

  • @slckb0y65
    @slckb0y65 3 роки тому +4

    sorry but i think you kinda missed the point, the whole idea is just that the only thing that can truelly defeat evil, is love.
    exact same story as in star wars, ultimatly what end up both saving anakin and destroying the empire is the mutual love between anakin and luke.

  • @fabiorabelo3506
    @fabiorabelo3506 3 роки тому +2

    Text book case to "overthinking"..... but I like it ...

  • @Flameboar
    @Flameboar 3 роки тому +2

    Thanks, Ben!
    I have always loved the 5th Element.

  • @ericbowers2828
    @ericbowers2828 3 роки тому +2

    Super Green!

  • @moonsorrow77
    @moonsorrow77 3 роки тому +1

    Pretty cool movie love the sci fi theme and Leeloo and the blue alien opera singer..don’t understand the words but still enjoying watching her sing..

  • @coryandrum
    @coryandrum 3 роки тому +8

    Who's that sharp looking guy? They must have cloned Ben and could not speed up the hair growth.

  • @anonymousrex5207
    @anonymousrex5207 3 роки тому +1

    Still one of the best sci-fi (and overall) films I've ever seen. It just has fun flow from the characters to the story and the visuals. I would love to see it get more love on your channel.

  • @therestingrancor8259
    @therestingrancor8259 3 роки тому +11

    Not a neutral force, love is,..but the strongest positive force, it is!
    Yoda❤️
    Oh.....&....
    MULTIPASS!!

  • @Shumac
    @Shumac 3 роки тому +1

    One of the most underrated sfi-fi masterpieces. 5th Element, Starship Troopers, and Stargate never get the credit that they deserve.

  • @Sam_Svit
    @Sam_Svit 5 місяців тому

    Magnificent analysis ❤
    Thank you!

  • @darrenskjoelsvold
    @darrenskjoelsvold 3 роки тому +3

    Umm, no love is the 5th element. You put water o the water stone fire on the fire stone and so on so you love the warrior and thus activating her and by extension the weapon. He didn't convince her, he activated her. He activated her like the stones were activated by their complimentary elements and the element that activated her was love.

    • @TriMarkC
      @TriMarkC 3 роки тому

      Good point

    • @darrenskjoelsvold
      @darrenskjoelsvold 3 роки тому +1

      @@TriMarkC well when you think about it, it's simple. The message then is that the way to defeat hate, which the big bad planetoid is supposed to be is the embodiment of hate, but the way to defeat hate is love. Kinda simple message really.

  • @Connor.SG-1Ring
    @Connor.SG-1Ring 3 роки тому +8

    *Suggestion:* Methods of Instantaneous Travel.

    • @joecrowe7062
      @joecrowe7062 3 роки тому +1

      Aleins do it by thinking it....they don't limit themselves by laws of nature.according to abducties

  • @stratometal
    @stratometal 3 роки тому +2

    I posit that when a star "explodes" its not being destroyed, its being transformed. Transformation (or transmutation) is the third force present in the dynamic between destruction and creation. Thus things in the universe are not really destroyed, at least not by the cycle of nature, but changed. Destruction then is not part of the cycle itself, not a part of nature, but a concept or manifestation of non-existence, and thus not really a "force". True destruction would then be the antithesis of the natural forces in the universe, since nihilation would then be truly something "outside" of the universe.
    I think that is what's been portrayed in the movie then. A "being" manifested within the universe, true nothingness, and what we observe then is the matter or the universe itself being deleted at the focal point. When Lilu releases the energy of creation, she "plugs" the hole in the fabric of reality, replacing the void with a new piece of reality, the moon is then just a byproduct of her reconstruction. Whatever matter was in the process of being unmade around the "hole" just collapses into a ball of dust, rock and ship pieces. That is my interpretation of what occurs in the Fifth Element, which really is love, or spirit, or whatnot, feminine force?
    That is another theme of the movie. Female creates and nurtures and male protects and transmutes, both forces then exist in harmony and balance, even within a singular person, we all carry both the female and male elements, since we can all create and transform. The protagonists represent these elements, at first in their "pure forms", but without their combining and evolving neither of them can complete the quest and save the universe. Of course the elements of female and male are not the same as gender, since we all have them and are more of a spiritual concept than a physical one, they just happen to be better understood when depicted in the duality of boy and girl.

  • @animac2004
    @animac2004 3 роки тому +3

    Bro, this was so insightful.

  • @danvegt85
    @danvegt85 3 роки тому +1

    This is my all time favorite movie! Good analysis!

  • @Slypto
    @Slypto 3 роки тому +1

    one of my favorite movies, I would kill for a new fifth element

    • @WRMonger1
      @WRMonger1 3 роки тому

      They totally left it open for a series or the franchise favorite trilogy.

  • @dogofwar6769
    @dogofwar6769 3 роки тому +5

    When I tell my children who Elon Musk is I'm going to use a photo of Zord to explain him to them.

  • @anthonyhiggins7409
    @anthonyhiggins7409 3 роки тому +2

    Aw... American Ben cut his lovely hair. The source of his power has been damaged.

    • @joeshmoe7485
      @joeshmoe7485 3 роки тому +1

      Samson and Delilah... Who stole your power, Ben??

  • @calenoch8813
    @calenoch8813 3 роки тому +2

    How about a look at an old school sci fi? Forbidden Plant, original War of the Worlds or The Day the Earth Stood Still.

  • @bloemundude
    @bloemundude 3 роки тому +1

    CORBIN?? CORBIN!!

  • @LindaB651
    @LindaB651 3 роки тому +1

    This just came up on my "recommended" list- and I'm impressed! Have subscribed!
    Hello from Rhode Island.

  • @egeo03
    @egeo03 2 роки тому +1

    Ian Holm was wonderful in this film. That man had range. ❤️

  • @dariustiapula
    @dariustiapula 3 роки тому +2

    My favorite part is the "WAR" search.

  • @Shatterverse
    @Shatterverse 3 роки тому +2

    Well the "ultimate weapon" doesn't destroy the ultimate evil - it _changes it._ Into moon 2.0. The ultimate evil doesn't seem to destroy so much as consume, like a black hole. The missiles the humans throw at it just... vanish, and the evil gets bigger. It would probably consume earth, not transform it into a dead rock.

  • @justinmacneil623
    @justinmacneil623 3 роки тому +1

    One of the most underrated films of the last 20-30 years. Thanks for this. It remains one of my all-time favourites alongside The Princess Bride (and The Empire Strikes Back, of course - but it at least is more widely recognised as an excellent film).

  • @PelenTan
    @PelenTan 3 роки тому

    Loved this.

  • @richardrodriguez6849
    @richardrodriguez6849 Рік тому

    Excellent work. My brother

  • @Aiden999
    @Aiden999 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you! Absolutely love it when you get all Philosophical!!

  • @CrymeScene
    @CrymeScene 3 роки тому +2

    send someone to negotiate. **headshot** anybody else want to negotiate? my favorite line of the film

  • @CurtHowland
    @CurtHowland Рік тому +1

    Zorg restates Bastiat's "Broken Window" fallacy, with the broken glass. All that ballet of supposedly "productive" work only gets back to what things were before the glass was broken. All that "productive" work is in fact effort running in circles to return to the starting point having accomplished the generation of waste heat.

  • @craigkdillon
    @craigkdillon 3 роки тому +1

    I am a sci-fi fan. I like serious science fiction, like Day the Earth Stood Still, Forbidden Planet, Blade Runner, etc.
    Fifth Element does not reach their levels, IMO.
    YET, I have watched Fifth Element more times.
    WHY?? It is just so much damn fun.
    True, I could, like you, apply my cerebral cortex and analyze it. And, you have shown it holds up to that.
    BUT, you don't have to do that to enjoy it.
    Chris Tucker adds nothing to the story, the plot, or the underlying themes.
    However, he adds humor, texture, and depth. He steals his scenes.
    What a great character.

  • @TheQuincyEdwards
    @TheQuincyEdwards 3 роки тому +4

    My favorite sci-fi film next to Event Horizon.

  • @joec9486
    @joec9486 3 роки тому +3

    Ouchie my face has been scienced

  • @Vogelkinder
    @Vogelkinder 3 роки тому +3

    \o/ : One of my top five movies of all time...

  • @temujanradari1105
    @temujanradari1105 3 роки тому +2

    5th element is awesome!

  • @yodaslovetoy
    @yodaslovetoy 3 роки тому +3

    Multi-pass?

  • @chrisortega7521
    @chrisortega7521 3 роки тому +2

    Finally cleaned up, eh ‘Merican Bean?

  • @donaldsmith8648
    @donaldsmith8648 3 роки тому +4

    YAHOOOOOOO i asked you last month to do a vid on The 5th Element.. And you did!! Thank you .. = NERDGASAEM!!!

  • @stevenwilliams1805
    @stevenwilliams1805 3 роки тому +3

    Still got the DVD.

  • @belladeann8398
    @belladeann8398 3 роки тому +1

    Thank You
    Because I LOVED this movie 🎥

  • @jordanbarkow4065
    @jordanbarkow4065 3 роки тому +2

    Takeaways- Sweaty Gary Oldman is GOAT, Life Life Life Life, Quar leads to circular thinking, Lilu Dallas Multipass

  • @MastinoNapoletano420
    @MastinoNapoletano420 3 роки тому +1

    There is a difference between Chaotic and Evil...a chaotic force can be good or evil just as a lawful force can be good or evil.
    The Mondoshawans are Lawful Good. They believe in saving the universe and do not raise a hand to attack nor defend themselves. They believe in sacrificing themselves for the greater good. They would rather jump in front of the bullet than shoot back or hide.
    Cornelius is Neutral Good, he is trying to do good in a neutral way. He will not get his hands dirty but will not be against others getting their hands dirty. Hence why he sees the weapon as a good thing but does not dare go on the quest to put it together himself. Eventually, when he is called upon, he steps up and takes a swing.
    Dallas and Leeloo are Chaotic Good. Their cause is for good but they can get destructive to see their mission completed and they don't see that as evil. If they have to crack a few eggs to make an omelet, they are the first ones to start cracking. (I personally fall in this category)
    Zorg is Lawful Evil, he is evil in its purest form in a man. He looks at it in a way that he thinks he is good or lawful, this is why he is rich and in control of a large corporation. He thinks what he does is righteous but deep down he does it for selfish and egotistical reasons.
    The Mangalores are Chaotic Evil. They will kill for selfish reasons, attack from behind, and are generally not pleasant to be around.
    Of course, it's not that simple. In each situation, the characters act in different alignments than in the ones I put them in above but they never stray from the good to the evil side and vice versa.
    One of my favorite movies, you had a great take on it 👍

  • @sherijobe9754
    @sherijobe9754 3 роки тому

    This is one of my favorites

  • @michaels.chupka9411
    @michaels.chupka9411 9 місяців тому

    seeing this as Saturday morning hangover fodder neglects to recognize luc benson's "the professional". "the professional" uses the hit man movie as a jumping off point to delve a relationship between a preteen and an adult male. luc benson tackles some very troubling themes within some very comfortable tropes.

  • @chrissnyder2091
    @chrissnyder2091 3 роки тому +2

    The dynamic interplay between order and chaos.

  • @TheEvilmooseofdoom
    @TheEvilmooseofdoom 3 роки тому +4

    I had issues with the audio. I could hear Ben speak but the movie clips were so low as to be silent and after that happened twice I decided it wasn't worth chasing the volume up and down. So I'll take your word for it.

    • @manicmarauder
      @manicmarauder 3 роки тому +1

      Same here, the volume matching between video segments was non existent. If I turned it up high enough to hear the movie the guy talking was way too loud. Usually they do better here but this one was broken.

  • @eastlynburkholder3559
    @eastlynburkholder3559 3 роки тому +1

    The warm fuzzy loving and nurturing force will never be separated from the harsh seeming protective force.

  • @torgomax
    @torgomax 3 роки тому +2

    ! CORBINMYMAN !

  • @jeromethiel4323
    @jeromethiel4323 3 роки тому +1

    You should read the recluse books by L.E. Modesette. The major theme of those books is that chaos (destruction) and law (order) are inherently at war, and inherently balanced. That an excess of one in an area, necessitates an excess in the other somewhere else. And that balance of order and chaos should be the true aim of society.
    A society that is pure chaos is just super violent and cannot proceed as they eat themselves. Whereas pure order is stagnant, and impotent. So you need chaos tempered with order to advance as a society.
    And Chris Tucker owned that movie. That was the best character in the film, and pretty much owned every scene he was in.

  • @donshipman8441
    @donshipman8441 3 роки тому

    I never looked at 5E in that light before. Thank you

  • @disbeafakename167
    @disbeafakename167 3 роки тому +1

    Hey, you finished the "Dirty Man Challenge"! That's awesome!

  • @danytargaerys712
    @danytargaerys712 2 роки тому +1

    One thing that's very interesting to me, is how the planets line up. The "evil" ball of fire charges forward at exactly the right time, to line up with the weapon. Which says to me, every inch of the story was pre-meditated. That's really the question that will cook your noodles. Had it taken a few minutes longer, or shorter to be activated, the light of creation coming from Leeloo and the stones would miss the ball of fire, due to the Earth's rotation.

  • @Sorontur3
    @Sorontur3 3 роки тому +1

    My mother thinks weapons were created to just kill (end life). But I think weapons were made first to protect life and to acquire resources for survival (perpetuate life). And the thing is, you can weaponise everything, even a damn cup.

  • @mrkrabstinysadviolin1400
    @mrkrabstinysadviolin1400 Рік тому +1

    I’ve never thought about this movie 1/10th as deeply as this and I’ve still always loved it lol. Is it weird to be a movie lover but not really ever think deeply about/analyze the films I watch and love? I just take them as they are, and that’s enough for me. I think about some things very deeply, movies just aren’t usually one of them for some reason. Idk.

    • @gregthomson2299
      @gregthomson2299 10 місяців тому

      It’s a good film, there’s no need to over analyse it imo, just enjoy it. To many films push a message these days before making an enjoyable film. It an easy to watch piece of escapist entertainment. No a common thing of late sadly.

  • @TogetherinParis
    @TogetherinParis 16 днів тому

    I provided much of the 5th element, right after the 6th Sense, if I remember right. You reference Braveheart and Saving Private Ryan, both of which also received my help. I wrote the speeches for Braveheart and made up some of the plot points. SPR was mostly my dialog with Spielberg, as with Braveheart, a few word-a-day vocabulary words thrown in just for good measure.
    Life is a local maximum of organization that increases overall entrope in the end, poop.