There is a random event that make you ally with Venice out of nowhere, so if I have to put my money, I am going to put in on Republic to be the next dlc
I think we will get - Trade / merchant republics (the foundations have been laid by Tours and Tournaments and Adventurers in Roads to Power) - An expansion based on nomads - Some event pack I also NEED a Crusader and warfare rework but I don’t think it’s coming, maybe 2026
This would be my bet, but I really hope they go with expanding and revamping religion alongside trade and republics instead of nomads. That really is just because I never ever play as a nomad though, but I play with religion a ton, so thats just my preference
@@tuxtitan780 I don't play as nomads either but that's because there isn't any to play. The steppe is just tribal with horse archers right now. I would like to see a religion revamp, but I think religion is in a far better spot than the steppe is. Personally, I would rather see Nomads to flesh out that region of the map. They would probably interact with neighboring regions in an interesting way as well.
Since you mentioned alliances, I really wish standard alliances were just Defensive alliances, which you could negotiate further into a full alliance through an interaction or scheme or something. Defensive alliances being the default would make things difficult in a way that makes gameplay deeper. And having to negotiate a full alliance for them to aid in offensive wars would add another element to warfare and roleplay and strategy that would benefit the game's depth.
07:00 as a veteran I would appreciate stuff like this. Marching formation and logistics, maneuvers such as flanks etc . The staging posts idea you said is good. Maybe Acre. If the units could form a line or if they deliberately dispatched smaller units - this is in response to you mentioning the way the armies move around the map
Related to the desire for knights/commanders to be more interesting: I think it would be cool to have a knight you could assign to manage/lead a unit of men at arms. For instance, having an acclaimed knight that specializes in heavy calvary lead the heavy cavalry.
I always play Ireland as an American Irish boy I for sure feel like forming alba and taking over brittainia as the irish should be the flavor pack have an intermezio or whatever it is in persia but with scotland england fractiring into mercia and possibly the norse think that would be sick
I think warfare could be improved by scaling how much you rely on levies. Make levies more important when you're a count, tribal and it's early game. Once it's like the 15th century and you're an emperor, your army shouldn't have to be 99% levies anymore. This would also allow them to implement consequences to having levies raised. If you raise every levy you have, and they get 100% stack wiped, that should have an economic impact. That's effectively most able bodied men in your realm being killed all at the same time. That would crush a country.
Tbh if they made it into an event pack or something that would'nt get in the way of the larger features i would be all for it, western europe is all too easy for tje feudal lords even if the mongols are at their doorstep. People bitched about far too much, you can just not buy the dlc or disable it, no one's forcing them to.
I think we should have more... Peasants and laws to smallfolk and trade interactions with other kingdoms? Buffs and debuffs with actions... I really really want more options to interact with smallfolk
Does anyone else feel like the "Buildings" could be expanded? I just feel like there could be so much more flavor if the amount to build was increased while lowering the actual bonuses.
I play a lot of warfare games, everything from Total War to HoI4 and even hardcore Wargame Design Studio releases. But I like CK3's battle system a lot and it seems perfect for this type of game. What I _would_ like to see is the depiction of these battles in a more interesting manner. An optional battle screen that graphically depicts what the AI is doing to determine the outcome. Skirmishers duking it out, archers firing volleys, knights getting beheaded by other knights, and cavalry pursuing routed units. Nothing the player can affect once it starts, but simply a visual presentation. AoW4 has a system that allows the player to watch an AI battle if they want to, so it's certainly feasible.
Ok last comment but it's worth it, Thanks for shouting out Eastern Europe, I agree and if you know me by now it's what I would have like yesterday. You made some other great suggestions too but yeah I think I have said enough already lol
I'd love subcommanders. For almost no other reasons than RP. Leading your army and having your heir lead your flank and your best friend/knight to the other flank was the kind of thing i loved to see. It added just the extra layer of strategy to not be overly complex and still relevant. It could be even more if events based on your subcomanders could appear.
As far as warfare reworks go, I think the army stance system from imperator could add some flavor. Perhaps along side a better battle simulation it would take in the stance of each army and how that affects the battlefield. Great video as always btw
I think the flavour and core context together is good. I think I can see a religious rework, which is needed sorely; I could see a diplomacy rework with that DLC. Which would make sense, how religion and diplomacy effect each other. Merchant republics would be great due to Roads of Powers, Tours and tournaments giving us key ground work for it. I think I can see them working on the horse lords too with DLC trade stuff. Personally I be happy with either Villains and Vagabonds or the romantic flavour DLC.
Staging area would be perfect for crusades but the issue isnt just with that especially if your battlling like a large abassid empire the issue is the enemies knights/men at arms, and supplies are superior on the islam sude and so the AU just run away from them instead of fighting
I hope that when they add republics to the game, they finally do something with Empower sicilian parliament. It would be cool to see what they'd do with it.
I think this year was great for dlc. What I'm really hoping for is a nomads / steppe rework for an eventual map expansion into China. Jade Dragon in CK2 was fun, but now that we have administrative mechanics you could actually pull of something great in the region.
A republics dlc will need silk road content, a silk road dlc will need india content or nomads content. So the amount of work left is huge if they keep a 1 chapter a year pace.. Id wish for a monastic dlc too, maybe something for africa also. But that wont be before 2028 judging by the timeline
One thing I actually think could be fun especially as a british pack is a rework to paganism and witchcraft with a theme of celtic welsh, cornish, irish and scottish witchcraft and a rework to it, possibly also a european witchcraft update with different types of witchcraft ranging from "harvest witches" to outright murder cults, which if you wanted a flavour pack to go wtih it could lead to landless players being able to rp a holy order/inquisitoin hunting down witches for piety especially with the idea of playable theocracies.
In terms of warfare, my biggest hope (albeit an unlikely hope, I don't think they'd go for this change) is the way armies are raised. I liked the way CK2 raised armies in their own provines, in vassal capitals and whatnot. I feel like that change alone would add a lot to gathering your armies, choosing which to raise and where and how much, weighing that with striking before your enemy can raise theirs, and adding a more organic reason not to overextend (isolated exclaves at the very edge or even disconnected from your empire would take time to get troops there and defend Rather than just placing a rally point and teleporting there) Never was a fan of flanks in Ck2. Felt gimmicky. And I like MAA. So that "raising armies in vassal capitals" change would be what I'd change with warfare primarily. I think it would make a very big, beneficial difference. (Along with general AI improvements. But that's a whole lot more complicated I'm assuming)
They should absolutely put naval combat into the game in my opinion. Lets just look at the most obvious example of Constantinople: One of the main reasons, that the byzantines were able to defend the city against sieges (in the ck3 timeline Rus', Bulgars, Civil Wars) was naval hegemony (at least in their area) and I think the addition of a naval combat system would fit perfectly into either a military/war rework or even the merchant republics rework. And of course merchant republics also liked to get into rivalrlies against each other and use battleships aside from merchant ships. But of course war is not the main focus but I still wanted to leave my opinion.
Last time we got insight from one of pdx programmer, they said that we likely won't get any proper warfare DLC. Just bits here and there. I hope they'll change their minds on this
I don’t remember the exact language used but I’m pretty sure we’ll still get flavor packs. The core mechanics pack which is $5 more is simply a different option they can slot into the Season Pass. If CK3 gets DLC for 3 or 4 more years I imagine we’ll get 2 flavor packs and 2 mechanical packs. Maybe only 1 mechanical pack.
I think there is def a Merchant Republic sized hole in the game. I think they will go the easy route of Nomads too with the domicile system and traveling being so focused on now. It seems likely to me although I agree that we need a religion update/overhaul. The fact the coronations arent in the game is crazy with the activities system.
As a whole Government Mechanics is probably the best thing Paradox can do to change up the Gameplay experience for CK3. I would love DLCs dedicated to making Theocracies, Republics, and Nomads playable. A unique Indian Government makes sense. I would over to see Clans and Feudalism to get touched up more. I would even like alternative versions of tribalism for Africa and a unique clan government for Ireland/Scotland.
I want trade republics in part because how much that would do for CK3 AGOT or I want nomadic government. I don't know why nomadic stuff is my 2nd I guess I have a subconscious need for horses😄
My dream for the next season pass is, like you said, a Major DLC about the HRE and Catholicism and everything that comes with that. A mechanical DLC about warfare maybe? It seems scummy so it probably won’t happen. Maybe instead a Flavor pack for Russia that has a warfare rework embedded into it. And finally a minor DLC. The minor DLCs are literally anything so who knows. I would probably love a minor DLC that heavily expands upon unlanded gameplay.
If they ever did a dlc around economy, I hope coins would be part of that with a coins mini game, when you became a kingdom you have the choice of making your own coins, the more wide spread and used you coin are inside and outside the Kingdom the better, and you have the choice on how many coins you make with a debasing system. Also I think Indian need a massive dlc, nomadic culture too, I understand that you forced primary on Europe because it's where you mostly play, but for me I could use an India and an Africa dlc about culture and religion their
I would like to see an unreformed Christianity, just being called Christianity, which would be the original one before it split to Catholicism and Orthodoxy. So when you unite the churches, either under orthodoxy or catholicism, it would convert one or the other to Christianity(either all orthodox or all catholics, depending who unites it), and since you need all 5 holy sites of one, you can then reform it instantly.
I miss the immersion of raising troops and them being raised in the counties the are actually levied from. Nope, the count and his retinue from tyrol are mustered in Luxembourg with the rest of my army some how?
What returns again and again in these kinds of discussions, in some degree on your channel, but heavily emphasized by other content creators, is the idea that PDX should bring CK3 to feature parity with CK2. There seems to be a vocal minority of players/creators who often voice this sentiment (I think that this is a minority, since Steam numbers show that CK3 is way more popular since its release than CK2 was some time before that and later). One of the idea voiced by these people is to bring trade and merchant republics and republic government, and it returns like every time PDX releases a major update, with all disappointed people that this is not their dreamed republic DLC. While I don't care about CK2, and I don't think republics should be a priority for CK3, I think PDX might cave in to these demands. As opposed to many of these CK2 lovers, I like flavor packs and flavor DLCs in CK3: I played intensively in both struggles, and I enjoyed Byzantine flavor part of the last DLC. Clearly, the east part of the map is underdeveloped, and I'd like to see a flavor pack in India, Tibet, or for Asian nomads, although I fail to see any possible combinations of such a flavor pack with general mechanic, like with Roads to Power. For political reasons, I hope they won't make East Slavic DLC (or Slavic DLC in general), since that would ignite clashes between players in social media amid ongoing conflict in Ukraine (where a lot of both sides ideology is based on their interpretation of medieval history of those territories). Despite some people claiming otherwise, I think many players come to CK3 to play with mods, particularly with total conversions (as shown again by Steam numbers every time a big mod like AGOT has an update), and I think these people cannot care less what vanilla DLCs we have, unless they bring something interesting to their beloved mods. I'd like to see PDX cater to these people, so new systems and mechanics would be interesting for that reason. Also, event packs are universally despised, I see no reason for making them, they can easily add these features to big DLCs, and do away with event packs altogether. Let's be honest, nobody buys these $5 expansions anyway, unless they come in a bundle, like a season pass.
I think the game would be so much better if they just used the imperator war and army system, especially since it does have a bit of a character focus at times
The more important question is what will AGOT add in 2025? Modders added more flavor to this game than these guys since launch that are more than a few lame events.
true but also got to respect Paradox give modders all these tools and support them so we get that stuff for free, they could easily be like some companies and block mods etc
Hopefully Republics and Trade. I really wish they would do a Content Pack with Cybrxkhan (from RICE MOD) too
Yes! Such a good mood with crazy amounts of content
There is a random event that make you ally with Venice out of nowhere, so if I have to put my money, I am going to put in on Republic to be the next dlc
Also guilds or merchant leagues
They set up the navy part with that greek fire decision with the eastern romans
I think we will get
- Trade / merchant republics (the foundations have been laid by Tours and Tournaments and Adventurers in Roads to Power)
- An expansion based on nomads
- Some event pack
I also NEED a Crusader and warfare rework but I don’t think it’s coming, maybe 2026
I could see that combo for sure, crusades would have to be 2026 if not this year
This would be my bet, but I really hope they go with expanding and revamping religion alongside trade and republics instead of nomads. That really is just because I never ever play as a nomad though, but I play with religion a ton, so thats just my preference
@@tuxtitan780 Agreed, but they mentioned actively working on nomads in a dev diary which is why I think it comes in 2025.
@@tuxtitan780 I don't play as nomads either but that's because there isn't any to play. The steppe is just tribal with horse archers right now. I would like to see a religion revamp, but I think religion is in a far better spot than the steppe is. Personally, I would rather see Nomads to flesh out that region of the map. They would probably interact with neighboring regions in an interesting way as well.
Now that they have done Administrative I feel like Theocracy, Republic, and Nomadic governments are in the cards.
100% that was the building blocks for other government types
But how could they make theocracies work if in many religions clergy is required to live in celibacy and have no heirs?
@@gerwazy6869 Let them figure it out.
Since you mentioned alliances, I really wish standard alliances were just Defensive alliances, which you could negotiate further into a full alliance through an interaction or scheme or something.
Defensive alliances being the default would make things difficult in a way that makes gameplay deeper. And having to negotiate a full alliance for them to aid in offensive wars would add another element to warfare and roleplay and strategy that would benefit the game's depth.
My heart still hopes for a Core Expansion with both Merchant Republics and Theocracies, like we get both Admin and Unlanded in the same RtP DLC.
🤞🏻
would be so good to get both this year and then they can build on them in the future
07:00 as a veteran I would appreciate stuff like this. Marching formation and logistics, maneuvers such as flanks etc . The staging posts idea you said is good. Maybe Acre. If the units could form a line or if they deliberately dispatched smaller units - this is in response to you mentioning the way the armies move around the map
Related to the desire for knights/commanders to be more interesting: I think it would be cool to have a knight you could assign to manage/lead a unit of men at arms. For instance, having an acclaimed knight that specializes in heavy calvary lead the heavy cavalry.
That would be cool
IMO we need a Celtic flavor pack or at least an update for them, they’ve been pretty untouched since release and their history is super fascinating.
I always play Ireland as an American Irish boy I for sure feel like forming alba and taking over brittainia as the irish should be the flavor pack have an intermezio or whatever it is in persia but with scotland england fractiring into mercia and possibly the norse think that would be sick
I think warfare could be improved by scaling how much you rely on levies. Make levies more important when you're a count, tribal and it's early game. Once it's like the 15th century and you're an emperor, your army shouldn't have to be 99% levies anymore. This would also allow them to implement consequences to having levies raised. If you raise every levy you have, and they get 100% stack wiped, that should have an economic impact. That's effectively most able bodied men in your realm being killed all at the same time. That would crush a country.
I think it would be really funny if they made Sunset Invasion again
The Dream! It's what the players want
Tbh if they made it into an event pack or something that would'nt get in the way of the larger features i would be all for it, western europe is all too easy for tje feudal lords even if the mongols are at their doorstep. People bitched about far too much, you can just not buy the dlc or disable it, no one's forcing them to.
The map expansion that they do is for Mexico and not China
5:28 I would argue that the conqueror trait makes this also a map painter when the player get the trait with the default rules.
Definitely does help that playstyle
I think we should have more... Peasants and laws to smallfolk and trade interactions with other kingdoms? Buffs and debuffs with actions... I really really want more options to interact with smallfolk
Does anyone else feel like the "Buildings" could be expanded? I just feel like there could be so much more flavor if the amount to build was increased while lowering the actual bonuses.
when we get merchant/trade i think they will do a light balance of the buildings too
3:05 hello mongol empire in the corner
I play a lot of warfare games, everything from Total War to HoI4 and even hardcore Wargame Design Studio releases. But I like CK3's battle system a lot and it seems perfect for this type of game. What I _would_ like to see is the depiction of these battles in a more interesting manner. An optional battle screen that graphically depicts what the AI is doing to determine the outcome. Skirmishers duking it out, archers firing volleys, knights getting beheaded by other knights, and cavalry pursuing routed units. Nothing the player can affect once it starts, but simply a visual presentation. AoW4 has a system that allows the player to watch an AI battle if they want to, so it's certainly feasible.
Ok last comment but it's worth it, Thanks for shouting out Eastern Europe, I agree and if you know me by now it's what I would have like yesterday. You made some other great suggestions too but yeah I think I have said enough already lol
I'd love subcommanders. For almost no other reasons than RP. Leading your army and having your heir lead your flank and your best friend/knight to the other flank was the kind of thing i loved to see. It added just the extra layer of strategy to not be overly complex and still relevant. It could be even more if events based on your subcomanders could appear.
As far as warfare reworks go, I think the army stance system from imperator could add some flavor. Perhaps along side a better battle simulation it would take in the stance of each army and how that affects the battlefield.
Great video as always btw
Thank you!
I think the flavour and core context together is good.
I think I can see a religious rework, which is needed sorely; I could see a diplomacy rework with that DLC. Which would make sense, how religion and diplomacy effect each other.
Merchant republics would be great due to Roads of Powers, Tours and tournaments giving us key ground work for it. I think I can see them working on the horse lords too with DLC trade stuff.
Personally I be happy with either Villains and Vagabonds or the romantic flavour DLC.
A struggle for Britain would be dope 🤷♂️
Staging area would be perfect for crusades but the issue isnt just with that especially if your battlling like a large abassid empire the issue is the enemies knights/men at arms, and supplies are superior on the islam sude and so the AU just run away from them instead of fighting
Yeah supply is an issue for sure, maybe they could bring in a supply type unit like that's coming in EU5
I hope that when they add republics to the game, they finally do something with Empower sicilian parliament. It would be cool to see what they'd do with it.
I sure hope they add something where maybe we would be able to go on tours. Hell, maybe even tournaments!
No way! Impossible
Unlanded and Landless Imperial play already suits itself very well to Republics and Theocracies
Yes! Republic with you visiting other ports to make deals
What about calling it “Sword and Quill” instead of “war and priests”?
That's a good one too
I think this year was great for dlc. What I'm really hoping for is a nomads / steppe rework for an eventual map expansion into China. Jade Dragon in CK2 was fun, but now that we have administrative mechanics you could actually pull of something great in the region.
A republics dlc will need silk road content, a silk road dlc will need india content or nomads content. So the amount of work left is huge if they keep a 1 chapter a year pace..
Id wish for a monastic dlc too, maybe something for africa also. But that wont be before 2028 judging by the timeline
Content for India would be amazing
One thing I actually think could be fun especially as a british pack is a rework to paganism and witchcraft with a theme of celtic welsh, cornish, irish and scottish witchcraft and a rework to it, possibly also a european witchcraft update with different types of witchcraft ranging from "harvest witches" to outright murder cults, which if you wanted a flavour pack to go wtih it could lead to landless players being able to rp a holy order/inquisitoin hunting down witches for piety especially with the idea of playable theocracies.
Nice. I really hope they work on warfare and religion. When do you think chapter 4 will be introduced?
Probably end of January beginning of February?
In terms of warfare, my biggest hope (albeit an unlikely hope, I don't think they'd go for this change) is the way armies are raised.
I liked the way CK2 raised armies in their own provines, in vassal capitals and whatnot. I feel like that change alone would add a lot to gathering your armies, choosing which to raise and where and how much, weighing that with striking before your enemy can raise theirs, and adding a more organic reason not to overextend (isolated exclaves at the very edge or even disconnected from your empire would take time to get troops there and defend
Rather than just placing a rally point and teleporting there)
Never was a fan of flanks in Ck2. Felt gimmicky. And I like MAA. So that "raising armies in vassal capitals" change would be what I'd change with warfare primarily. I think it would make a very big, beneficial difference. (Along with general AI improvements. But that's a whole lot more complicated I'm assuming)
They should absolutely put naval combat into the game in my opinion. Lets just look at the most obvious example of Constantinople: One of the main reasons, that the byzantines were able to defend the city against sieges (in the ck3 timeline Rus', Bulgars, Civil Wars) was naval hegemony (at least in their area) and I think the addition of a naval combat system would fit perfectly into either a military/war rework or even the merchant republics rework. And of course merchant republics also liked to get into rivalrlies against each other and use battleships aside from merchant ships.
But of course war is not the main focus but I still wanted to leave my opinion.
Last time we got insight from one of pdx programmer, they said that we likely won't get any proper warfare DLC. Just bits here and there. I hope they'll change their minds on this
I think it will come as a smaller part of some DLC, it wont be a huge warfare only one
I don’t remember the exact language used but I’m pretty sure we’ll still get flavor packs. The core mechanics pack which is $5 more is simply a different option they can slot into the Season Pass. If CK3 gets DLC for 3 or 4 more years I imagine we’ll get 2 flavor packs and 2 mechanical packs. Maybe only 1 mechanical pack.
I think there is def a Merchant Republic sized hole in the game. I think they will go the easy route of Nomads too with the domicile system and traveling being so focused on now. It seems likely to me although I agree that we need a religion update/overhaul. The fact the coronations arent in the game is crazy with the activities system.
I think the Silk Road+mongols+nomad rework is more important to the overall game than republics, crusade rework, etc
The Hanseatic League is already available on debug mode
If they improved how struggles worked I wouldn't mind crusades becoming a struggle of a sort
As a whole Government Mechanics is probably the best thing Paradox can do to change up the Gameplay experience for CK3. I would love DLCs dedicated to making Theocracies, Republics, and Nomads playable. A unique Indian Government makes sense. I would over to see Clans and Feudalism to get touched up more. I would even like alternative versions of tribalism for Africa and a unique clan government for Ireland/Scotland.
I want Cults, Nomads, and Republics back so bad man
I would like to see a rework of commanders/knights like in ck2, but also merchant republics/expanded trade would be so good
Hopefully they add something like societies you can join again. That was fun with ck2
I think the more weird things like that probably start coming 2026
Ck3 content from Malf 😁
Can't wait for everything next year to talk about
Playable Holy Orders for all religions (example: Gazi-Darwish within Muslims)? Unlanded Assassins with Hasan Sabah was good move in the way
So the Kwarezmanids do this Everytime right and they always change from blue to red, and I don't know why. Anyone care to share some light on this?
I want trade republics in part because how much that would do for CK3 AGOT or I want nomadic government. I don't know why nomadic stuff is my 2nd I guess I have a subconscious need for horses😄
Hopefully a pope system and republics
I want trade, more map and a warfare rework
The lack of Egyptian flavour is odd to me
They just got that Egyptian Scottish content 😂
I feel like holly orders should also have a different government type and be able to grow.
I would love to see naval battle in the game.
My dream for the next season pass is, like you said, a Major DLC about the HRE and Catholicism and everything that comes with that. A mechanical DLC about warfare maybe? It seems scummy so it probably won’t happen. Maybe instead a Flavor pack for Russia that has a warfare rework embedded into it. And finally a minor DLC. The minor DLCs are literally anything so who knows. I would probably love a minor DLC that heavily expands upon unlanded gameplay.
If they ever did a dlc around economy, I hope coins would be part of that with a coins mini game, when you became a kingdom you have the choice of making your own coins, the more wide spread and used you coin are inside and outside the Kingdom the better, and you have the choice on how many coins you make with a debasing system.
Also I think Indian need a massive dlc, nomadic culture too, I understand that you forced primary on Europe because it's where you mostly play, but for me I could use an India and an Africa dlc about culture and religion their
I'd love content in Africa, India, steppes to get people to play there more
I would like to see an unreformed Christianity, just being called Christianity, which would be the original one before it split to Catholicism and Orthodoxy.
So when you unite the churches, either under orthodoxy or catholicism, it would convert one or the other to Christianity(either all orthodox or all catholics, depending who unites it), and since you need all 5 holy sites of one, you can then reform it instantly.
I miss the immersion of raising troops and them being raised in the counties the are actually levied from. Nope, the count and his retinue from tyrol are mustered in Luxembourg with the rest of my army some how?
I liked it in Imperator Rome where the county raised in affected the type of troops you got
The only thing i want is really to up the difficulty of the game to ck 2 levels
Can a man dream of a Religion DLC with perhaps a great schism in 867 start date?
GIVE ME A NEW LAW SYSTEM
What returns again and again in these kinds of discussions, in some degree on your channel, but heavily emphasized by other content creators, is the idea that PDX should bring CK3 to feature parity with CK2. There seems to be a vocal minority of players/creators who often voice this sentiment (I think that this is a minority, since Steam numbers show that CK3 is way more popular since its release than CK2 was some time before that and later). One of the idea voiced by these people is to bring trade and merchant republics and republic government, and it returns like every time PDX releases a major update, with all disappointed people that this is not their dreamed republic DLC. While I don't care about CK2, and I don't think republics should be a priority for CK3, I think PDX might cave in to these demands.
As opposed to many of these CK2 lovers, I like flavor packs and flavor DLCs in CK3: I played intensively in both struggles, and I enjoyed Byzantine flavor part of the last DLC. Clearly, the east part of the map is underdeveloped, and I'd like to see a flavor pack in India, Tibet, or for Asian nomads, although I fail to see any possible combinations of such a flavor pack with general mechanic, like with Roads to Power. For political reasons, I hope they won't make East Slavic DLC (or Slavic DLC in general), since that would ignite clashes between players in social media amid ongoing conflict in Ukraine (where a lot of both sides ideology is based on their interpretation of medieval history of those territories).
Despite some people claiming otherwise, I think many players come to CK3 to play with mods, particularly with total conversions (as shown again by Steam numbers every time a big mod like AGOT has an update), and I think these people cannot care less what vanilla DLCs we have, unless they bring something interesting to their beloved mods. I'd like to see PDX cater to these people, so new systems and mechanics would be interesting for that reason. Also, event packs are universally despised, I see no reason for making them, they can easily add these features to big DLCs, and do away with event packs altogether. Let's be honest, nobody buys these $5 expansions anyway, unless they come in a bundle, like a season pass.
Thats were we disagree i want boat!!!!!!!!!!!!! 🤣
No boats 😂
I bet we will rather get nomads.
for warfare just bring ck2 system if they are too lazy.
Religion please, it's so flat and 2-dimensional. And warfare, how alliances work, and so on. Dynamic CBs and being able to escalate a war.
Hopefully they add china 😄
booooo you 😂
One thing I guarantee will not come: Hard mode
I mean no way to really do "hard mode" bar just boosting the AI stats
19:28 The Russians?
Idk about you guys but am i the only one getting bored of ck3 in general ? 😢
Good time to take a break till next DLC is out
@@Malforian yeaa
I think the game would be so much better if they just used the imperator war and army system, especially since it does have a bit of a character focus at times
I'd love the commands you could give them per army to automate some of it
The more important question is what will AGOT add in 2025? Modders added more flavor to this game than these guys since launch that are more than a few lame events.
Play agot ck3 without any dlc
true but also got to respect Paradox give modders all these tools and support them so we get that stuff for free, they could easily be like some companies and block mods etc
@@Granochereal
What makes you think I need any?
@@jabarithomopson1960 you don't, so don't.