You're missing the point. Nintendo has NEVER in over 40 years of history in the gaming industry, EVER, numbered their system (before you go there, I am talking about calling a sequel console the ______2 instead of some other iteration, not the numbers that appear in the name of N64 or 3DS, which were referring to how many bits the system handled and it being a 3D dual screen - 3DS - respectively and had NOTHING to do with them being a sequel system). Ever. They don't DO that. So if they DID do that here, it'd be the first time in over 40 years they EVER have. Think about it. Nintendo --> SUPER Nintendo (NOT Nintendo 2) Super Nintendo --> N64 (NOT Super Nintendo 2) N64 --> Gamecube (NOT N64 2) Gamecube --> Wii (NOT Gamecube 2) Wii --> Wii-U (NOT Wii-2). Wii-U ---> Switch (NOT Wii-U 2) Also the same with their handhelds and other devices. Gameboy --> Gameboy ADVANCE (not Gameboy 2) --> Gameboy Color DS --> 3DS (NOT DS 2) Anyone hanging on to hope of it being Switch 2 has not paid attention to Nintendo's history in the industry. They don't do "2" systems. Now, they could always go AGAINST that history - that's true - but historically, it's HIGHLY unlikely to be simply called "Switch 2".
@@minecrafter3448Super Switch is worse than Switch 2. If they called it the "Super Switch," it would be as big of a failure as the Wii U, because LIKE the Wii U, the people who aren't nintendo fans (parents, children, businesses) would just assume it's an accessory for the previous console, leading them to believe that it's unnecessary to buy.
@@d500dev that’s… what it is. It is just an upgrade. People didn’t buy the Wii U because they thought it was an expensive ACCESSORY. It would take a name like switch attach to confuse casuals. The switch has far fewer accessories than the Wii did, and none of them are labeled “switch blank” Only something the directly implies accessory can be confused for an accessory.
The Super NES Switch 3DSi
"your hired"
Banger
If the dual screen patents that Nintendo filed are for the next switch I would be surprised if it was called the Nintendo flip
I like that a lot actually
Maybe it's the 3ds 2
You are right, It's not the Switch 2 because the real name should be the "Nintendo G10"
Cool
Hey, I'm interested in being a gamer. Any suggestions u can make? Also, I love ur videos
Oh, because 2 implies that it’s just the switch and not a sequel, of course. /s
You're missing the point.
Nintendo has NEVER in over 40 years of history in the gaming industry, EVER, numbered their system (before you go there, I am talking about calling a sequel console the ______2 instead of some other iteration, not the numbers that appear in the name of N64 or 3DS, which were referring to how many bits the system handled and it being a 3D dual screen - 3DS - respectively and had NOTHING to do with them being a sequel system). Ever. They don't DO that. So if they DID do that here, it'd be the first time in over 40 years they EVER have.
Think about it.
Nintendo --> SUPER Nintendo (NOT Nintendo 2)
Super Nintendo --> N64 (NOT Super Nintendo 2)
N64 --> Gamecube (NOT N64 2)
Gamecube --> Wii (NOT Gamecube 2)
Wii --> Wii-U (NOT Wii-2).
Wii-U ---> Switch (NOT Wii-U 2)
Also the same with their handhelds and other devices.
Gameboy --> Gameboy ADVANCE (not Gameboy 2) --> Gameboy Color
DS --> 3DS (NOT DS 2)
Anyone hanging on to hope of it being Switch 2 has not paid attention to Nintendo's history in the industry. They don't do "2" systems. Now, they could always go AGAINST that history - that's true - but historically, it's HIGHLY unlikely to be simply called "Switch 2".
@@kalevipoeg6916 Super is the second most popular speculated name for the system. Super switch would be great.
@@minecrafter3448Super Switch is worse than Switch 2. If they called it the "Super Switch," it would be as big of a failure as the Wii U, because LIKE the Wii U, the people who aren't nintendo fans (parents, children, businesses) would just assume it's an accessory for the previous console, leading them to believe that it's unnecessary to buy.
@@d500dev that’s… what it is. It is just an upgrade. People didn’t buy the Wii U because they thought it was an expensive ACCESSORY. It would take a name like switch attach to confuse casuals. The switch has far fewer accessories than the Wii did, and none of them are labeled “switch blank”
Only something the directly implies accessory can be confused for an accessory.
@@minecrafter3448 ok, i meant accessory. how does that change my argument?
'Promo sm'