Another Dan McClellan strawman and contradiction.

Refuting Dan mainly in his own terms, philosophical problems and with counter scholarship. I give an overview of the Christian position, but if you want a more theological take: go to the Fathers and get an Orthodox priest, watch our clergy on UA-cam.

[@DeanBurrito]

NICE. Keep these McClellen refutations coming!!

[@Ac-ip5hd]

Refuting Dan mainly in his own terms, philosophical problems and with counter scholarship. I give an overview of the Christian position, but if you want a more theological take: go to the Fathers and get an Orthodox priest, watch our clergy on UA-cam. There are further issues I have been careful on here for TOS.
I have critiqued “them” enough and have no wish to debate either those who blame them for everything nor those who cannot allow them to be criticized for anything. Revelation has an element of mystery and many Theologoumenon, wether the genuine article capital A Antichrist comes from “they” or not, the fact he is of the world against Christ and the tribe of Dan forsook their inheritance and mixed with the world and was a judge of Israel is an indisputable fact of the Bible.
The choice between submission to God and worldly power is a recurrent theme throughout.