More videos: Interview Part 1 Reaction: ua-cam.com/video/Bw015LP3gVQ/v-deo.html Interview Part 2 Reaction: ua-cam.com/video/DPqgusw3JpI/v-deo.html Interview Part 3 ua-cam.com/video/WhHZ9wRvWSU/v-deo.html Watch my UK #johnnydepp trial analysis Amber Heard INTERVIEW REACTION PART 1: ua-cam.com/video/Bw015LP3gVQ/v-deo.html JUROR SPEAKS OUT: REACTION: ua-cam.com/video/g42oqjO9k6w/v-deo.html UK Trial ANalysis: PART 1: ua-cam.com/video/iPfPG0qSERs/v-deo.html Part 2: ua-cam.com/video/OWMMcKVEaLA/v-deo.html PART 3 ua-cam.com/video/pt4efD6uTJk/v-deo.html Petition: www.change.org/JusticeForJohnnyDeppUK #JohnnyDepp Playlist: ua-cam.com/play/PLOu1C4wHKjG56JEzgHzNjfbgyJfPzHa9Z.html Also me: ua-cam.com/users/blackbeltsecrets My wife's cooking: ua-cam.com/users/easychinesecooking
Respectively, you should put timestamps in the video, that 40 sec intro felt so long for me i almost quit the video 2 or 3 times but i was patient. I would have not thought about quitting if I saw a timestamp : 1) Intro 2) Video 3) end.
She always says what felt like my eye or my this or that. She is clearly mentally ill and I don’t mean that in a bad way. AmberHeard needs a psychological intervention.
@@thoughtleader96 She absolutely mean everything in a bad way. She chose Delusion + no accountability + EGO + Arrogance and not accepting when not being wrong. She is in fault dont worry about that.
What stuck with me was, if he was abusing her, why would she chase him down when he wanted to leave? That makes zero sense. Listening to the tapes, you could hear her trying to egg it on, trying to get him to react violently, which isn't Johnny's nature, and must have really pissed her off. The blackmail paper's were very telling as well, that just screamed gold digger.
Its about possesion and control. I don't want that toy and discard it. But as soon as someone else shows interest it becomes, no thats mine (possesion) or loss of control. Childish Nursery school playground tactics/politics. Also by taking action means attention and contact/control with the desired object. Potentially a mentally unstable "if i cant play with it " then "nobody else will" danger.
Yes I did notice in court AH pointed to the wrong side of her face. I real victim does not forget where they were injured. This woman needs to be brought up on perjury charges
AH is not done. She is relentless. She is ramping up for the next battle. Every time she opens her mouth she betrays herself and reveals her intentions. I feel everything needs to be completely taken apart and analyzed. Please keep going.
Imagine having to cope with this if you were married to her. She'd never let an argument go until she won. Has she got a deeper psychiactric problem? Apart from the narciscism thing?
@UCtD-2nsKZg6jyUviLNfGnAg You have seen and heard it ONLY YOU, because all of us who have FOLLOWED THE WHOLE process HAVE NEVER SEEN NOR HEARED ANYTHING of what you wrote while the Nick name you gave yourself tells us a lot about you !!! Recover yourself and don't tell lies there is not enough a liar: the videos and audio tapes, even those that could not be seen by everyone, were ALL available to the jury and above all to the judge.!!!
She’s like my ex she’ll never stop a court order will need to be put in place were she can be locked up if she continues n even then if she gets a court order against her she’ll still try to push the boundaries there too my ex still tries to push boundaries now 8 yrs on despite an order in place narcs especially obsessed narcs never stop
Exactly! Could you imagine Bill Cosby or Harvey Weinstein being on talk shows after their trials! Why does she get a platform to lie about JD after losing in court because she will just keep doing it!
She uses "Felt Like" many times during the trial. You can't argue with it. You can't say she didn't feel it. Right? She used so many weird made-up or learned tactics it's not funny. Very "Witchy" soul she has.
Another BIG sign of deception which is really prevalent in this instance, is when she shows the hand motion of the phone being thrown. She claims she didn't throw it, so why is she motioning as if she had? If it was actually thrown at her, she should have shown herself ducking or moving her head as though she been hit. A perfect example of this, is the hand motions and head movement that Johnny used when describing what happened when she threw the first bottle at him. He motioned his hand to show the bottle flying by his head, and moved his head out of the way, which is how he would have reacted in the moment when it happened.
Also when she talks about being grabbed by her hair, she uses a gesture of her pulling and not her grabbing at her own head where she claimed to be grabbed. I thought it was very odd using gestures that show you doing the action.
I just mentioned this and now have scrolled to find yours. That really jumped at me. She can’t help but mime her own actions. Not from her supposed perspective as victim, cos it didn’t happen!
She does the same for the choking I think too. She doesn’t mine trying to remove hands from her throat…she mimes choking someone else. And she mimes the act of head butting too…not the reaction to the head butt. Even as she acts things out she is not the victim in the pantomime. She is the aggressor. She acts out the hits but not BEING hit. When JD demonstrated something he is obvious in his position in the situation as he tried to explain it. That is what I expect from someone reenacting and explaining a situation from their memory.
I am a DV survivor. What I particularly look for are markings (or bruises) of a mentioned area. IF she was hit in the eye, not only would there be bruising,swelling and discolouration but there would be blood inside the whites of the eyes. PLUS there would have been a record of the findings from a hospital or optometrist or from any health specialist
A woman threw a whisky tumbler at me in 1982, it hit me on my left eyebrow, causing a gash, and a closed black eye. A thin bloodshot streak in the white, still there after 40 years.
I don’t necessarily think there would be blood in the whites of her eyes, that is from broken blood vessels in the eyes. It doesn’t happen to everyone. From just one incident I had very severe injuries requiring emergency surgery on my nose, septum and lips. A second nose surgery and had to wear splints on my teeth for about 6 months and have a root canal. I am still recovering and it was over a year and a half ago. I did get sort of black eyes, at least one but no blood in the whites of my eyes. The nerves of my nose, lips and teeth have not returned to normal. I still have pain and sort of a numb/tingling sensation all around the area. But I guess you did say if she was hit IN the eye. Then you would probably be right.
with the way she describe what happen to her in her testimony i imagine she was in a coma with an unrecognizable face / in her last breath in hospital , not perfectly fine in the next day picture . this is why you dont over exaggerate your testimony AH it backfired big and made your entire case not trustworthy at all 😂
Can you imagine the size of the lacerations from the rings on JD's fingers? Plus AH admitted in the audio the JD recorded that when JD walks away to de escalate it is the same as punching her.
It seems to me the job opportunity was the entire point for her. edit- took out the part where I feel bad for her. Because I really don't. I feel bad for him.
YAH WHEN SHE WAS AUDITIONING WITH JOHNNY FOR HIS FRIENDS BOOK AND MOVIE ROLL RUM DIARY SHE WAS PROBABLY WORKING ON AUDITIONING FOR THE ROLE TO BE WITH JOHNNY AS THE ONE WOMAN SHOW OF MAN EATING GOLD DIGGER LOL
The “ aging “ of the bruise doesn’t correspond to a facial impact bruise that was supposed to be 6 days old when she filed for the TRO in the Courthouse. Those pictures show a red fresh bruise and that’s not what she would have after 6 days
This was actually one of her more obvious slip ups, if I were JD I’d be continuing to do more of the same and ignore everything that she does from here in the woman is clearly very troubled 😕
she also said that was what she called it---I hate Amber and I am glad she lost but lets not take things out of context. She said she called it her bruise kit because she used it to cover bruises
She also stated in court that she has never called herself a victim nor want anyone to say that. But yet in the tell all she clearly calls herself a victim. This lady is crazy and needs help.
She overreacted to that too, like she is thinking "I'm a SURVIVOR, not a VICTIM". It was eerily similar to the part in the Jussie Smollett interview where he tried to emphasize how much he "fought back" to show he wasn't some pushover. I haven't seen people who have really been victims of violence overreact quite that way to someone calling them a victim. They might say they don't think about themselves that way, but there is a different connotation. It's more like a positive statement that they are making to affirm their own self image, not attempting to boast or brag or glorify themselves.
She went to the court house for that restraining order one week after Johnny left the country. He was not going to be there again for a few months and she new it.
I feel that talking about it cannot be done too much until we start acknowledging that it's abuse not just female getting abused but males getting abused and because mainstream media won't acknowledge it we have to keep putting it out there
I don't think its quite true to say that MSM isn't acknowledging male abuse; I have heard it mentioned quite a few times now. I also think that this is a reflection of society which we all (majority) often participate in minimizing abuse of all kinds.
I have noticed that no MSM outlet has dared to go near the female on male domestic violence. It is like it does not exist. I think it may be due to the fact that the domestic violence industry has a lot of important financial stake holders and the MSM always sides with not rocking the boat. Billions of tax dollars are given away to NGOs and government agencies under the guise of the male on female domestic violence model. It is like when Henry Ford introduced the Model T, the horse centric industry fought tooth and nail. A lot of women are waking up because abused men are their brothers, fathers, sons, nephews and so on.
Compared the Guardian's deluge of opinion pieces on the 'Holocaust" of misogyny that the jury found Heard defamed Depp to their complete and utter silence on the 800+ child rapists who have had all charges dropped as they supposedly "apologised".
This was exactly what I said watching live. She had a “ mark” on her right cheek, but motioned to her left. There was also testimony where she was claiming JD threw a glass at her, but her hand motions did the action of throwing the glass instead of dodging the glass. Thank you for your breakdown, I didnt catch the shrug, I just thought her arm was awkward at the throwing motion.
Same with her describing the bottle she threw. She said it was him. She thinks everyone else is stupid. When she described the bottle, she said he was holding it when she was motioning she was holding it. Saying did you drink all of this. Amber is a horrible LIAR
Dude was gone six days. He left the day after his mom died and had to go right away to the premiere in Spain... He wasn't thinking about her. Then she does the lawyer threat letter she knows he can't respond/show up cause he's gone. Files for divorce, THEN LATER, files for the TRO. Changes his locks and around midnight has Franco up. Like her friend and feebie neighbor Josh said, over 30 as he knows off WHILE they were married. But she was in fear? Wanted to stay where she was abused? She's so independent, a star, progressive woman hear me roar but no better than poor me, I need a man to get anything. This is global BS to move legal agendas against men, these women moving these cases across ponds aren't smart enough to get where they've gotten. This shouldn't have gotten a TRO, period. No ER reports, bum friends never took her to a hospital, other shelter, support group, police precinct, victims servies in Hollywood? All those friends and she didn't have a place to live away from there? And no one has mentioned how she was with the kids, which pisses me off. She's sitting there with a kid she couldn't be bothered to have (seems that way since the trial too, she'd come out better just being a mom than what she's doing now without her); whose dad fought to have the embryos destroyed, who's rich and lost? Nah, this is global emasculation of men, all around. It doesn't make sense. She has a PR that sexually harassment/allegedly assaulted several women? Come on, wha'ts going on here? And all those bringing cases use the same lawyers, people? I don't know if the dudes are in on it too cause I know, from the audios, and not being a man, she would have been underground within 15 minutes or met with an unfortuanate accident while I was off shooting/filming in another country.
@@aligaines8476 "This shouldn't have gotten a TRO, period." Absolutely! "No ER reports." And "stay where she was abused?" And so many other great points!
The fact that she constantly directed her answers to the jury as opposed to looking at the attorney who was questioning her was a sign that she was trying to get the jurors to believe what she was saying, along with her display of annoying facial expressions. it truly came across as a way to get the jurors on her side. Anyone could see that it was part of her acting skills.
She was setting Depp up from the very beginning. She’s relentless and won’t stop until she’s in jail. She’s released some ‘doctor’s’ notes now that weren’t allowed in court, as the judge said they were here say. I’m getting really bewildered now how she just won’t let it go. Johnny cleared his name in court but still she is defaming him. It’s not fair.
Therapist's notes, not doctor's medical notes. What she said to her therapist and not admissible, and even they look a bit suspicious to me. Considering how fast Amber talks, that writing would be impossible to do in the time. The therapist would surely use some type of shorthand to keep up!
The one part of the trial that proved she was lying was when the TMZ employee came on to say that they had obtained permission from the copyright owner to publish the video. Surely if Amber hadn’t give permission she would have sued TMZ for publishing the video. 🤷♂️
Actually, this is a very key point.. You own the Copyright if recorded on your device. Camille Vasquez stated that TMZ now owned the Copyright. The only way that ownership would shift, is if Amber Heard SOLD the Video to TMZ. That in itself is enough evidence. Its a shame the excellent Miss Vasquez did not push that point further. Amber Heard really needs to be brought to account & serve some time. That seems to be the only way to teach her a lesson.
The TMZ guy also stated that it can takes days, weeks or even Months to track down, and obtain copyright from the owner of any footage/photos etc. He stated it took 15 minutes to obtain copyright ownership from the owner of the footage, the guy stated that copyright ownership can only be obtained that quickly is if the owner is in contact with them, sends them the footage/images and signs off the copyright ownership to them. Hence, this came directly from the source. Amber Heard.
Yea and she makes it sound like 'How could she? She was on the plane' ummmmm there's WiFi on the plane and there has been for several years. So yes, she could have sent it from the plane.
That and she never stated, "I want to know who leaked footage from MY phone." Who has private media leaked and doesn't mention feeling betrayed or exploited? Just cannot stop lying.
@@jamiem6562 And sending a dropbox link literally takes less than 60 seconds. They really tried to act like we're stupid people who do not use technology.
To me the key gesture is she makes the action of throwing the phone, not the phone coming at her as Johnny does when he describes when Amber threw the bottles at him in Australia. She doesn’t realize it but she’s telegraphing that she’s the aggressor.
also what she describes is there is a time for her to move her head, normally if something thrown at you, especially you have seen it coming from the very beginning, you just move your head to doge it.
Yes, I noticed that she gestured toward her left eye although the other side was supposedly injured. And what's huge about that to me is if you're talking about what you felt you certainly wouldn't go to the wrong side. You would be remembering the feeling when the phone hit so you would automatically point to where you felt it.
When she stops and adds “-what /felt/ like my eye” signaled to me that she is trying to avoid a definitive statement “the phone hit my eye.” Instead of saying that the phone absolutely hit her eye, she says “it felt like” it did. We can’t tell her what she “felt”, I think she was hoping that adding those words would save her. If she said “it hit me in this eye”- that’s black and white and there’s no wiggle room if she gets caught lying. So she falls on the “well it felt like my eye”, right in this safe grey area.
She is used to looking at photos of herself and remembers the pictures instead of the event itself - because the event did not happen. Gesturing to the wrong side is a definite tell, IMHO.
When she did that in court, I was yelling at my computer that she's pointing to the wrong side! I couldn't believe what I was seeing. Another big tell.
She should be charged with contempt of court and Johnny Depp should be given a restraining order against her and any contact or coming within 100miles of him or anyone connected with him. She should be behind bars preferably with a straight jacket on and men in white coats
I noticed that pointing to the other cheek during the trial. Believe me, when a loved one betrays you with violence, you don’t ever make that mistake. The emotional scar becomes almost muscle memory of touching where you were struck.
I also noticed and wondered why she was gesturing to the opposite side of her face. People don’t tell stories of things that really happened to them and get the FACTS wrong!
If I am not mistaken this happened years ago. And also, this is the face, not a knee. You only see it in the mirror. Which could confuse a person. How she said it was more telling.
I wrote this quote down from her interview the other night because it really stood out to me as a survivor myself. I had to go back and pause several times so I could get it verbatim: “when your life is at risk, not only will you take the blame for things that you shouldn’t take the blame for, but when you are in an ABUSIVE DYNAMIC psychologically, emotionally and physically, you don’t have the resources THAT YOU OR I DO with the luxury of saying ‘hey it’s black and white”. I take issue first of all with the repositioning of blame. To me, she is trying to shift from a he was abusive and I was not at fault at all argument, to a “well it was a toxic relationship so there is fault on both sides”. Damage limitation. My abuser did this to me when I left him. He wrote letters to my close family and friends stating we were just in a toxic relationship, making it out like it was a two-way thing to deflect blame from him. And the really telling thing here is her saying to the interviewer that people who are abused don’t have the resources of those who haven’t been abused - the use of “you or I” so she is not seeing herself as someone who was abused and is aligning herself with someone she assumes hasn’t been either. She does not speak for abuse survivors because she isn’t one. It’s sickening.
A.H Is A narcissistic sociopath lying gaslighting coldhearted evil ABUSIVE women . Amber Turd DOES. NOT speak for Abuse Victims Or victims of violence of any kind … PERIODT!!!!!
You're aware the NBC, when they aired the full interview, cut the "you or I" part, so it had her saying "you don't have the resources of saying "hey, it's black and white". I wonder who made that decision and why? Because the full clip had already been aired.
Learned and skilled people like you are hope for people like us who are genuine DV survivors. You’ve pointed very accurately many facts about this case in the UK trial and your observations on the US trial are spot on! I, and most of us, have also noticed many such gestures, facial expressions/contortions, body language and multi speak (for the lack of a better expression) and found her so obscenely dishonest. It would be a travesty of justice if the dialogue doesn’t continue. She should be made accountable and punished for her evil deeds. Thank you for your relentless efforts and informative videos. We’re with you.
A hit in the eye - you would know, and remember. A projectile to the face without any response to deflect would also be rare. Thanks for spotlighting this gem.
This! This is exactly what I was thinking when she was testifying. She also doesn't describe what happened in detail. One would think that she'd be able to describe things like which part of the phone hit her and how, ie "the corner of the phone hit my cheek" or "the phone hit flat against my face", etc. If you listen to her accounts of the attacks she says she suffered, you'll realize that she is missing a shocking amount of details. She says a lot that sound like details but are actually vague generalities more often than not.
Just like when she "owned up" to her behavior in that recent interview "Oh yeah I've been so ambiguously horrible and toxic, done all sort of... uh nondescript things." We know, Amber, we know all the shit you've done the idea was for you to actually own up to even one single event, but no she couldn't even do that.
What she never took into the equation when planning to frame Johnny is that he is in his late 50,s.He had a clean record until he met her in spite of admitting to addiction to pain killers ( this never affected his behaviour) All his past girlfriends, his children, his family and friends had the same description of him.A gentle soul, kind, caring ,very protective and very generous as well as being a fantastic actor.She on the other hand has a string of past aggression towards family and friends and partners That's why I won't believe Johnny was toxic.He had to defend himself all the time and she kept him from his loved ones whilst moving her family and friends into Johnny's Penthouses They lived off him,paid nothing whilst all calling him a monster and plotting with her Josh Drew seemed the most honest.
@@loati94 not only did she not mention pain, but she downplayed the pain and the bruises. The 1st time he "slapped" 3 times and she said "I wish he had said he was joking, because it didn't hurt, it didn't physically hurt".... it's been a few decades since my last slap but I remember the sting of it (like an echo 🤣) Or when Camille ask her about her face with no swelling (after being punches repeatedly) she said she used ice and the swelling isn't that bad in those kind of attack and for her it wasn't that swollen at all.... 😳 has she ever seen a face after a SINGLE punch!?! My sister-in-law was punched on the cheek, a single punch, and the entire left part of her face was grotesquely swollen, eye closed up, red from a few busting veins.... you couldn't look at her and not feel distressed even though she started the fight... allegedly. Swollen for about 2 weeks and it took a few months before make-up could effectively cover it up. When she said that I was screaming at my phone in JD voice "don't tell us what it looks like to be punched!!!!"
Agreed. Whenever she was on the stand talking about Johnny "attacking" her, it was always in very general "he was hitting and hitting me" or "Johnny grabbed me by the hair and just kept punching me: etc. She never actually gave any direct, full descriptions of any of the alleged attacks. I found that very disturbing about all of her accounts. No full, complete details...just general descriptions.
I agree with this. I specialise in HR investigations and do a lot of them, and I too have learned to spot the "tells" of deception which are very much as you describe. Truthful responses are short, to the point and don't come with fluffy narrative. People creating a story inadvertently fall into the trap of over-embellishing the narrative, feeling that it will somehow make their account more credible. Of course, I can never base a finding on body language, but it is a great signpost for where to go scratch at the story!
All her body cues are wrong. She does not realize that the human body never forgets trauma. It becomes etched, sometimes it is then packed away, or manifests in other more destructive ways. Nevertheless the body will remember and will spring it on trauma victims unawares.
I’m not so sure about this. I have experienced having had to do a lot of explaining to clear up misunderstandings, and feeling as I’m explaining that it looks like I’m lying even though I’m being truthful.
@@j.j.1064 Thanks! I can only talk from my own experience which is that, when something signals that a particular line of narrative warrants closer examination, more often than not an inconsistency is revealed. As I said originally, I'm not suggesting making a determination or finding based on such a signal, simply that it's something that catches my attention that will often result in the discovery of some inconsistency or concealment. The JCSPsychology channel here on UA-cam has some good analysis on police interviews and the topic of truthful vs non-truthful signposts pops up regularly. I'm not sure about logical fallacies, but it certainly would be true that there are many cognitive biases which one must be aware of and cautious not to succumb to in such a situation. Gladwell references truth-default theory a lot but in my view this theory does not have that solid a foundation - indeed Hanlon's Razor is an aphorism arising from the tendency to distrust - the assumption of malice.
It felt, to me, that she kept qualifying with those “I feel” statements because you can’t falsify a feeling. She’s trying to protect herself from being caught in a lie. E.g. if in cross-examination she was asked “but you weren’t hit in the eye, were you?” she thinks she can say “that’s what it felt like to me”.
Like someone else pointed out, whenever he left to escape her, she used words and emotional blackmail that made it sound like him walking away was him physically abusing her, and maybe it does feel like that someone with her conditions, but that doesn't make it reality.
Agreed. She did the same with the 2 versions of the face picture. Something like "It looks to me like the different light was turned on, you know, those makeup lights", so she couldn't be done for perjury.
This night , Johnny asked his bodyguard to wait just outside the door. When he was aware of a physical event, something like, “stop hitting me!”, he rushed in and saw nothing of the sort. It wasn’t a physical fight. Amber was doing her dramatic rant and it was for anyone in earshot. However, she was not aware the bodyguards were outside, and was amazed to see them. The best thing she could come up with then and there, was that Johnny threw a phone. I don’t see the logic of him throwing his own phone and busting it. So he purportedly grabbed Amber’s phone from (typically) her hand, BACKED UP and threw it. Because what is the point of throwing the phone from a foot away? Just hit her. But no, grab something handy. Anything. I am saying, draw this quick move and break it down. I want to know if people throw a phone to hurt someone. It won’t fly through the air like a ball. Who knows. Everybody grab an old phone and throw it. I bet it is uncontrollable. She said “phone”, because the bodyguard was there immediately to protect Johnny, but there was nothing to see. She had not yet thrown a bottle, or spilled the wine( in the hallway! nice. Just have the hallway carpet cleaned) The police body cameras did not ‘capture’ any spilled wine. Explain that! JD had already left. So if the wine was not spilt, and JD is in NYC, AH is ready for her close-up. She is getting a restraining order to protect her from a man who will be in Europe for three months.
We should carry on talking about this while she still gallivants around the telly stated how bad the judgement was and we shouldn't stop until people treat her correctly as the guilty party of the court case. If she was a man she would be blacklisted from all these media outlets she's chatting *BS* to.
Amber is being given airtime simply to create chaos. Keep in mind who owns the media and you can easily understand why. It's another sign of the times. And, no doubt, it's not going away any time soon either. So put on your seatbelts, "It's going to be a bumpy ride." (Bette Davis)
The thing is, this is not over with Amber Heard and Johnny Depp. She is still trying to appeal and she still is talking about him abusing her regardless of the ruling. This is an ongoing situation that we should talk about.
Amber's body language is very evident. no abused person behaves that way. Those of us who have suffered abuse in our lives have very easy and spontaneous emotions. we have a hard time hiding fear and pain. Amber inadvertently declared, having a kit to make/paint, blows. there is a video of the court, which we can listen to her testimony.
Especially the way that she acted when she was leaving the stand but didn't fully realize that JD was there as he and his party were leaving as court was dismissed.
The trial is over. The world can see how full of shit she is, we're all agreed there. What is not helpful is weighing in with "oh, I don't think an abuse victim would behave like this", "an abuse victim would remember that". Regardless of the fact that Heard specifically is discredited - and not before time - given neither you nor I are experts in domestic abuse, I don't think it helps anyone - least of all people who may have actually experienced domestic abuse and have to give evidence one day - to let them know people will be picking apart their mannerisms to make "well, I reckon" conclusions about their honesty.
You mean the "bruise kit" when she accidentally 🤣 says my bruise kit, I mean my theatre make up kit, which "I called my bruise kit" and us "average" people as she just call us were like, WHAT? She just slipped right there, but Johnny's lawyers didn't notice in the court in that moment
One more detail: The demonstration she makes with her arm when she is describing Johnny allegedly throwing the phone at her is far more convincing and natural than - what you are pointing out - her demonstration of the phone hitting her eye. I’m no expert but too me it makes me think that she is recalling one of the many times that SHE - in my opinion - has thrown something at Johnny…
In that moment, she also shakes her head "NO" when she says it... Denial... Her brain knows it's false... Plus, a cell phone is HEAVY... One would need some EXPERT aim (as one would if throwing an axe) to be able to know how to throw a phone and hit a specific target...
@@RAe-om3ld good point. In many instances she has stolen others stories to pedal as her own. The instances with her previous assistant and also the story from Evan Rachel Wood.
Well said, as always. - I most heartedly agree that we DO need to continue talking about this (for at least as long as she continues to do so), precisely because of the very serious nature of what she not only attempted to perpetuate, but very nearly DID. Were it NOT for the cameras in the court, to allow the public to see certain aspects firsthand, we might never have really known the truth. And it is only important for the public to know in so much as it shows what is POSSIBLE for someone to do and get away with. It is fundamentally wrong, and shows another area of weakness in our legal system, I think.
Yes, thank you! So many times she referred to something and then doesn't follow thru with what one would expect a natural body reaction to be. This is a perfect example , its the wrong damn cheek!.. A true victim wouldn't mistake which cheek had been hit!
it's more than memory. The SENSATION of being struck, the swelling, the injury being painful and carefully attended to for the next few days remains. She also claimed to conceal the bruises at all times with makeup; how could she gesture to the left cheek when she felt every stroke of the brush on her injured and sensitive right cheek? Even without the shoulder shrug, can conclude that she was lying.
@@edwardh50g And of course the day she was at court and had alerted TMZ (which she has also lied about) for paparazzi to be present, she had a "bruise" not concealed, and moved her head to display it for the cameras as TMZ worker said she was expected to do. She also gave away about her bruise kit, changed the wording when she slipped up.
@@mizofan Yeah, "This is my bruise kit, because unlike everybody else in my industry I refer to a bruise kit as something to cover up bruises not to apply them. You will obviously believe me because I am such a great actress so nobody is going to think I slipped up there"
Absolutely logical and fact based. No way I can tell you last month I broke my right arm and lift the left arm while saying it. I really wish in the furure you have the time to break down every single incident because there are SO MANY that went unnoticed. Thank you Sir 👍
I'm so glad you pointed this out! I saw the same thing, and I think I noticed it unconsciously, but after you pointed it out... You're definitely right! This trial has been hashed over and rehashed, but I don't see anyone talking about that, and that is a definite sign of deception. She's not "recalling an incident." If she was, she would have pointed to the right (correct) cheek!
My vote is for you to keep talking about this case. I watched most of it on youtube, and so I find it fascinating to hear your legal analysis and compare it to my own 'reasonable member of the public' view of what I saw.
One lie runs into another lie into another lie into another lie. I think she starts off with the intention of one lie but then exaggerates it which sends her off on a lying spree with no option to turn back. She is a compulsive liar and I don’t believe she believes it. She knows it’s lies but doubles down anyway because she would rather dig her heels in than admit defeat.
In an audio when JD accused her of lying to the security guard after she punched him. She finally admitted the punch (even if she refuses to call it a punch) but not the lie. He said I watch you lie and she lose her mind and refuses to admit it. I was kind of like that as a kid. I could confess any wrong doings but never a lie. Nothing was worse and more humiliating to me than to be caught on a lie. It still is, I think. That's why I never lie. Plus I have a very bad memory, nothing is easier to tell and remember than the truth.
@@lilyluh You have to have a good memory to be a liar. She has told that many lies I dare say if the trial was re-run again it would be a completely new set of lies but with the same end spin. Just a different route to the end spin. She clearly refuses to accept defeat and to blatantly spin in front of millions of ppl on TV with no signs of any remorse speaks volumes about her dark personality. It’s confession through projection and I hope she pays every day for the rest of her life but I do hope she has ppl in her life with integrity who would be a good influence on her child. I fear what type of environment and what impression she will make on that child with her being a narcissist.
After a month went by Johnny not being there. He and two body guards went up so he could pick up a few things. He tossed the phone on the couch, went into the kitchen area. She started yelling 'stop hitting me' (something like that) The guards came in and saw they were far from each other. They had Johnny get what he needed and they left. Only being there half an hour. She's such a liar on all levels ...
And in her UK testimony she put her hand to her right eye. Seemed strange. Of course, she was lying. Thankyou for your legal view. Always illuminating! #AbuseHasNoGender #IStandWithJohnnyDepp #JohnnyDeppGotJustice #JohnnyDeppKeepsWinning
She pointed at the left side of her face when she described where the phone hit her during her court testimony, yet in her now infamous appearance at court in 2016, her "bruise" appears fresh [even after 6 days after the alleged incident] on her right cheek.
This makes me laugh because it’s so true, the cruel narcissist I was with tripped in our local park and decided to claim compensation from the council by faking injury during the claim he had to go and see an independent physician he came back feeling pretty pleased with himself, I can’t remember how long it was before he found out he had the doctor examine the wrong ankle. I got the blame, which wasn’t unusual, but despite his temper I still couldn’t stop laughing on the inside that he had made such an idiot of himself.
That is an excellent story. All of AH’s lies are coming back to haunt her. Yet she still keeps running her mouth. I think they should have cuffed her after the trial because she admitted she assaulted Depp. Then she would be in jail and no one would have to hear all of the lies on top of lies at least not on TV. When she got on the stand the final last time she said “that’s why. I wrote the Op Ed due to all his power” but in the interview she says “the Op Ed was never about Johnny”. And the sad part is they give her the questions in advance so planned that response. If I was Savannah, I would have called her on that one and I would have said, you do realize you totally lost the case in statement because that was what the trial was all about and you did Depp’s job of proving you defamed him. She is so idiotic and truthfully has completely lost track of all her lies and reality.
@@bonitameredith8991 She's grossly entitled, probably thinks she is clever, but is actually surprisingly dumb, unaware of the effect of inconsistencies in her poor-harmless-me tales of woe that are not backed up with physical evidence of injuries. Contrast that to Depp responding totally straight about everything.
Yes! I caught it immediately. She pointed to her left side in court and her apparent bruise was on her right side. Again, one is easily led to believe she lied about getting the hit. Thank you highlighting the fact. I’m glad others recognized the difference.
I was accidentally hit by a basketball on the left side of my face which gave me a really bad bruise right below my outer eyebrow. That incident wasn't even particularly traumatic. It was just an accident that had happened to me over 10 years ago. But if you ask me about it now, my body would still naturally point to where the bruise was cause my body would just remember it by instinct. That's just stuff that you almost never get wrong.
The last thing she said on the stand was how she wanted it all to be over, and she just WANTED TO BE LEFT ALONE! She whinged about how JD wouldn't leave her alone .. Yet here she is. STILL GOING. Just another BS LIE!!
The most revealing point in this trial for me and my refuge sisters ; who have survived violence, was the carpet reference. None of us, when in an actual state of fight or flight, or freezing in fear during violence, would have the head space to even notice the condition of the carpet. Drug use would be my only suggestion for this creativity but on the whole, to me, that narrative does not and did not stack up, at all. The carpets are the last thing you would be worrying about in those moments , it’s chaos 🙏
Very true and insightful. In moments of violence you are just trying to survive and it’s fight/ flight so your brain doesn’t often notice little insignificant things.
And how many survivors say they still love the man who raped them with a broken bottle? And refer to the situation as both Ugly and Beautiful? And why is she pretending to write at the table? Donate vs pledge and she shouldn't have to donate for people to believe that she did? Clip of her "oh no" covering her mouth because she slipped that she notified TMZ in previous interviews... the list goes on and on.... she wants to keep Depp engaged and the rest of us transfixed! Parakeet floors, file rank? ARGHHH if she doesn't shut up soon the only work she will get will be in adult films....
Amber Heard is said to read a lot. I read some, too. And writers often go into details like that because it paints a picture in the reader’s mind. My guess is that she was emulating that writing technique. She did it in other instances, too. Like when JD “threw” her across the floor and while she was sliding on the floor, she noticed how beautiful the wooden floor was.
I do remember thinking when she described this incident that " it felt like my eye". If I was describing it after the fact I would know exactly where it hit. It feels like she is entwining how one might feel in the moment vs the actual event. Ergo acting word salad 😒
I love your channel, found u through popcorned planet.. u are so spot on, living in the UK I really hope we can hope we can right this wrong for JD and real survivors- whatever gender where ever they live x
Yes found you through popcorned planet as well and I'm subscribed and you're one of my go to favorites now. Along with your analysis of this trial and the connection to narcissistic behaviors creating so much trouble for people you could easily jump over to Meghan and Harry and the narcissistic world they live in 😆
Very good observations. I never noticed her hand pointing to the left eye, then the bruising being on the right eye. I hope you continue to point things out to us! The one that got me in the trial, was when she 'accidentally' mentioned her bruise kit!!! I don't remember everything off hand, but she may have said something to the effect that she got her bruise kit, but immediately changed her slip-up, to something like she meant her make-up kit. I wish I could recall her wording exactly, but at the time she said that I was shocked!
The fact that it wasn’t even the same side of her face is very telling… when I’ve been hurt and go to the doctor retelling/enacting what happened for me to get hurt; even after I’m healed I point and motion to the same area that was hurt originally it’s like a natural reaction when it’s actually occurred…You just remember
Exactly! Like the part where she says it hit what felt like my eye?!!! How would you have to guess at this?! I was abused and was hit with a beer bottle in the right eyebrow/cheek bone area and I can definitely remember that. She sickens me with all his because I was abused for ten years by my alcoholic husband and I can probably recount every single incident vividly if someone were to ask me. You don't forget these things when they actually happen to you.
I really enjoy the way you explain things. Lies need to be dismantled systematically with clear language by legal professionals. This way we know justice stands a chance in this society.
I quite agree. But I am sadly coming to the conclusion that the word truth has become tarnished by so many twisting it to suit their own ends. In short: Truth is now a dirty word. And we are all becoming victims as a result.
I noticed the left-gesture thing when I first saw her testimony. (I was a ballet dancer, so am conditioned to mentally reversing demonstrations of choreography or what I see in the mirror.) I did feel it could be because of lying. I also imagined it could be because she is performing for the jury, off to her oblique right, and automatically/subconsciously (as an actress) doesn't want to cover her face with her hand. Yet even that indicates she's constantly aware that she is "performing" her testimony.
It could be either she forgot what side she fabricated an injury, (because it was fabricated) or just as possible, the photograph of her has been flopped.
TWO THINGS struck me about her testimony of this incident: 1. The inconsistency in the position of the "injury" she said she sustained during the alleged phone incident. I picked up almost instantly that, while on the stand, she indicated using her left hand that the phone had hit her by her left eye/left side of her face. However, the "injury" is supposedly on the right side of her face according to her photos. If you have an injury, old or current, and you're referring to it, you'll always point to the actual position of that very injury no matter how old it is. 2. The bold and almost "look at me" manner in which she sported her "injury" in front of the courthouse. People who are visibly injured as a result of DV tend to hide their injuries and/or try to disguise themselves from the public. When I listened to her testimony on the stand, she claimed to not want "it" to get out there. YET, in her photos, she was standing tall with her chin held high, sporting the "injury" and not cowering or making ANY attempt to hide from the media at all. THOSE TWO inconsistencies are what made me doubt her testimony on that incident.
I’m a nurse practitioner and people do this all the time. They point to the injured body part, so I can usually guess where the injury is. Great catch!
In all of her testimony she used phrases as disclaimers so she wouldn't be caught in a direct lie, or perceived as lying: I thought at the time, I remember, I can't remember, I think it was about, and the big one: It felt like. She used that line a lot, especially surrounding abuses to her body. Convenient when she turns out to be incorrect, isn't it? Love your channel. Thanks so much.
@@markusgorelli5278 yes!! It felt like my nose was broken, it felt like a broken bottle, it felt like it hit my eye.... all potentially very serious injuries but she never felt *the need* to go the hospital! And she never once said she was scared to see a doctor, just that she didn't need it.
@@markusgorelli5278 Didn't she say something like "I thought I had a concussion and I was certain I had a broken nose" which became "yes, I thought my nose was certainly broken" or some other twisting of words when it was picked up in cross. So she was trying to claim that just because she had used "thought" in the previous statement that carried over to everything that followed. The problem for her is it just looks really bad when she has to jump through hoops like that to get out of a lie.
PLEASE! As a woman, investigate the timeliness, allegation of how he "dragged me through broken glass and my feet were sliced up." Then within 24? Hours or kess she was on a talk show/event with 4 inch heels. How did she get jnjured feet to walk in heels??????
In the recording of Dr. Kipper and nurse Debbie in Australia you can hear AH walking around in heels. How could she have possibly been wearing heels if her feet had glass in them?
Whoever told her to do the interview it was a disaster and now a jury member comes forward and tells it like it is. It destroyed her entire interview. I told ppl In that part of VA, some ppl do not do social media, YT, at all. So for her to say social media played a part I knew that was a lie. Ex my husband has never had one social media account he can’t stand it. There are a lot of ppl who feel the same. But it came down to credibility and AH is not credible. There were just to many lies that she told that ended up being debunked. And yet she is still in denial. 😳🙄
Right!! She has no shame & doesn’t care how much evidence there is against her & how many witnesses & how much she’s been debunked!! She just keeps on & on & refuses to stop trying to explain her lies, proving how guilty she truly is!!!
Did you notice that when she testified about getting hit by the phone she pointed to the left side of her face, but the courthouse video showed the bruise on the right side of her face. I don’t think I would forget which side was injured. Also, if Johnny is right handed and was facing her, it’s likely it would have been the left side. But the bruise was on the right. By the way, I also posted this yesterday.
I feel someone should have had a cotton wool swab with make up remover on and wipe the bruise kit off her in public She had no bruises except for when she had Botox or her cheekbones enhanced
The only time he might have used a different hand is post finger cut but her story just doesn't add up at all and I definitely noticed she actioned the phone hitting the opposite side from her "bruise" 🤦♀
@YT none of her bruised photos were mirrored, you can tell because her face isn’t perfectly symmetrical. Her left brow is angled at the tail end, while her right rounds out. Her bottom lip is much thicker on the left side than the right and also droops downward. Her bruises are always depicted on the right because it’s easier to apply makeup on the same side as your dominant hand.
@YT also there is video on UA-cam of her coming out of the courthouse for the TRO. The bruise is infact on the right side of her face. So there is no mirroring. Plus as you said text but that could have been added after if a picture had indeed been mirrored
It's still very relevant because Amber Heard is treating the court and jury's judgement with utter contempt by repeating lies that have already been disproved in the case verdict. She should have an injunction at the very least put on her to prevent any further deformation. It's insulting to the Judge, jury and overall verdict. Keep up the good work BBB! 👏
Your exactly Right her testimony doesn't add up especially when Camille called her out on how many times she slipped up. And used her own words against her.. amber kept blaming everyone else for lying and won't take accountability for her own Lies...
My issue is how her hand motioned for "pulls his arm back with the phone" & her arm moves for "and throws it at my face". Hand looks more like it's about to make a fist. Arm moves like it's skipping a rock on the water. Who throws something, intending to do damage, sidearm instead of overhand like a baseball. It looked like she was playing Rock Paper Scissors. I guess overall it looked like she was throwing a punch, not a phone.
One way people say you can know you're dealing with a narcissist is if it feels like every interaction with them brings out the worst in you. And I think that's what happened to Johnny. He crossed a line, occasionally, but it was always in reaction to her over the top insulting behavior, and of course, physical threats. I think he admitted to head butting her, but that's when he couldn't dodge her blows anymore and tried to "bear hug" her to get her to stop it. He needs his career back and she needs to go off into obscurity.
I think it's called reactive abuse. The abuser will antagonize you until you explode. You will do & say things that aren't normal for you. This is great for the abuser bc they get to look like the victim (ala AH) & they get to say "SEE? I TOLD YOU THEY'RE CRAZY!". It's a double-whammy. Actually I think it might be a triple because as a person with empathy you'll feel bad about the things you said & did, so you will apologize to them & they get to forever use it against you. Aren't they fun people? 🤯
@@AprilsJessesGirl you both hit the mail on the head. I don’t deny that he hit her, but it was in reaction to her antagonism and crazy making. My sister is an abusive narcissist and I saw her in Amber Heard. She’s on her second marriage with DV and has even lost her kids because of it. But she has this way of antagonizing and egging, with her words and body language that is so threatening that it activates your fight or flight. My sister once threw a glass of water in my face and I reacted by pulling back my fist to hit her. I was assaulted first! Then she shrank back like some victim and I realized what had happened, what happened in her marriages. It’s what happened with Johnny and Amber. It is wrong to hit someone, even reactively. If Johnny never reacted, she wouldn’t have been able to twist things to make a domestic violence narrative. And I’m sure Amber isn’t 100%. There is an element of truth somewhere but we have no idea where it is and it’s definitely not what she’s trying to make everyone believe. She takes no accountability for her actions, it’s always everyone else, and she is the one who has authority and should be believed. And it all has to do with maintaining this sense of superiority and specialness that they think they deserve. It is so triggering for me.
@@hermitwatcher8997 I have been married for 33 years. About 15 years ago, during an argument, my husband said something so hurtful and untrue about me that I slapped him across the face. He instinctively slapped me too. First and last time either of us got physical. I remember it all very clearly, unlike AT who is deliberately vague about everything.
@@hermitwatcher8997 reactive abuse isn’t actually abuse though. I thoroughly researched it after seeing the therapist claiming they abused each other, based on Ambers claims only of course. I disagree that it’s wrong to hit reactively. Many instances of hitting reactively is in self defense and you damn well have every right to defend yourself, period.
I remember that too, but I believe he said it wasn't on purpose and that it happened accidentally while he tried to stop her. Didn't he even stand up in court and showed how it happened?
I remember that testimony and one of my thought was that one knows when the eye is impacted it’s not a question of maybe, this includes any part of the orbital socket. It’s very sensitive and damages to it don’t quickly disappear (I’ve had bruises in that area) yet the so called bruise in the photo was a small circle on the cheekbone NOT within the eye socket. I questioned the validity of that bruise as based on my experience and her story about where she claimed the alleged injury and the timeline of it was not matching her photo.
So mad I said exactly the same thing this morning on your Amber interview review that she had acted out the incident on the total wrong side am so glad that you’ve agreed with me 👍🏻🥰
I remember it bothering me during the trial and again during the video of her interview. Why would she point out the wrong side?! She seems right-handed, she described JD throwing movement with her right hand and her being hurt with her left hand... that plus the inability to produce tears while fake crying it's almost as if her body can't tell no lie! Except her mouth. People say she doesn't have one truthful bone in her body and I'm starting to disagree. Her body very much would like to escape the prison of her lies.
Highly informative being able to look over a barrister's shoulder. I remember one barrister from AU saying that they had many ways of reaching the truth in a case. Another time I was asked to forward transcripts between AU and USA. That trial lasted 21 days, slewed much money. Reading the texts was compelling to say the least. Never having seen either party, one had to "imagine" what the parties looked like.
Yes! I noticed that straight away, it was so very obvious. And, as you correctly say, subconsciously, we point to the injured area that we're describing 99 percent of the time. It's as though her continuity controller has missed the most obvious things, which is why I've always believed she was being untruthful. I tried so hard to believe her at first, but she made it too difficult to do so with her obvious lies. Thanks for continuing with these clips and observations. I don't think we'll ever see anything else more interesting for body language education any time soon. :)
I spent 7 weeks watching and rewatching this trial. It is important for both men and women. I recently listened to a podcast where they were talking about how careful people need to be because everyone on the podcast had been accused unfairly of abuse by a partner, coworker, or even family member. He said it was important to use your phone to record things so you had some proof. Pretty sad that this is what is still occurring in our society. Please continue to drop some nuggets of information.
As a DV survivor I thought she was lying about being hit around the head and face several times especially the ‘broken nose’ because there was never any pictures of blood in the whites of her eyes, even after the swelling went down and I could open my eyes again I still had bloodshot eyes for days if not weeks sometimes.
the thing that got me was she had NO MEDICAL EXAMINATION - there's no record of it, after this supposed incident, but she claims her NOSE WAS BROKEN..So who diagnosed that????
I badly injured my right knee 15 years ago. Had final corrective surgery 5 years ago. Injured my left knee not less than 8 months afterwards. I vividly remember both incidents and even though I have equally qualifying injuries to each knee I do not mix up the side I'm speaking of when I retell each injury.
That gesture to the wrong eye stood out to me in the trial as well. I haven't heard anyone else mention it until now, so thank you for that. I love your videos, keep up the good work! ❤️
When she walked out of the court toward her car she was looking forward but then you could see her deliberately turn her face to the photographer so they can see the supposed bruise, if your a real victim you try to hide your face.
Yes!!! She was practically looking straight up to make sure it wasn't hidden 🙄 Uggghhhh !! Everyone with a brain can see she was setting him up... I'm so glad he won !!
My ex hurt my left arm when he tried to drag me from car. The veins on my hands bruised as I hung onto the steering wheel. That happened in 1997. Whenever I recall the story, I can still feel the pain and emotions. She pointed to the wrong side, plus it simply didn’t feel as if she was recalling a traumatic event.
@@BassHeartRiffs What a ridiculous thing to say, maybe you can't recreate the exact biological response from memory, but of course you can remember that something hurt and you were in pain and you don't want it to happen again. Combined with an event like this where someone you should be able to trust has turned on you, this isn't something you would forget. Reliving that experience in testimony and not even being able to touch the place where you were hit seems like a massive red flag to me.
Interesting. If anyone has ever watched any videos of Jackie Chan speaking about his injuries through the years, you will see him point to various parts of his body. It is done instinctively without hesitation. AH was stuttering when she was on the stand recounting what had happened to her. Her mind was going into overload because she couldn't keep up with all the lies.
I have just subscribed because it’s good to hear different perspectives from different legal standpoints! I like that you notice the finer details which (most likely), not all of us would. I really hope you’ll continue to discover and then share other findings you have , that are pertinent to A.H’s deceit! Thank you 🙏🏼👍💯👌🇨🇦
When people start getting really vague about major, impactful incidents it's a clear sign of either lying or having been very intoxicated or somehow impaired when the incident took place.
This is something I picked up on at the time when watching her testimony and also that of all her witnesses (ex-friends) who mentioned her bruised cheek: they all gestured to their left cheek as they talked about it. I seem to remember only one of them was then asked which cheek it was (iirc Elizabeth Marz but they all blurred together at one point; though her whole testimony stood out as odd), idk if I'm misremembering, but I seem to recall a pause before she then then said it was the right cheek. With the clip you showed of AH it's even more telling because she had just gestured with her right hand, so her hand was already in use but she then swapped it for the other. Idk about the other witnesses but she is right handed so it doesn't even make sense in context where they could have claimed she gestured with her dominant hand. It's a clear indication the injury wasn't real, but it's even more telling because it makes me wonder how they _all_ could make the same mistake with their action...the only explantation I can think of was they originally intended to do it on the left side (maybe even tried it but couldn't get lighting/angles for the photos they took... so the redid them by creating the red mark on the right) and then changed it for when they took the photos & went for the TRO. Also, someone needs to call her out on not being able to get the TRO privately, because lawyers who have worked in that court have said there are three private exits and they will ask which exit you want to leave by. I could understand 1 or even 2 people indicating the wrong side, but when everyone who claimed to have seen the marks makes the same erroneous gesture, it sets off alarm bells. As for self-correcting her wording, she realised that it would be picked up on because the bruise wasn't "in" the eye, so she changed it to "felt like", the same as she did when challenged about the broken nose, so it became "it felt like it was broken".
Noooo ..... now I gotta go back and re-watch testimony. lol. Ok I have an idea. Which of the pictures were taken with the front facing camera? Meaning that she took them herself - and they were reversed. So it was in fact on the left side of her face. I recall with the head-butt pictures, there was a framed letter in the background that we could read. But the phone-bruise pictures have most of the background cropped off. And because AH & Rocky were relying on the photos for the TRO and it was a few days afterwards, they forgot. 😬
@@markusgorelli5278 I did wonder that myself at the time about her taking them herself, but then I'm fairly sure either Rocky or her ex said they took the pics.
THANK you for pointing out that Amber’s gesture while testifying was indicating that she was hit on the LEFT side of her face!! That jumped out at me while watching the trial & I wondered if the jurors or others noticed that, too!!
It sounds like a scripted scene, when someone who claims being assaulted, starts by describing the assaulting part's arm movement before, and then adds "with the phone". Too much information / observation is often a sign of lying.
Please keep giving us your expertise on this case. There's so much to unpack after a 6 week trial. And I think this case and its aftermath is important.
50 years ago as a teenager, I got hit by a piece of wood on the right side of my nose. I have never, ever referred to it as hitting (or felt like hitting) the other side. It's in my body's cellular memory, not my conscious memory. You don't forget where you were hit.
More videos:
Interview Part 1 Reaction: ua-cam.com/video/Bw015LP3gVQ/v-deo.html
Interview Part 2 Reaction: ua-cam.com/video/DPqgusw3JpI/v-deo.html
Interview Part 3 ua-cam.com/video/WhHZ9wRvWSU/v-deo.html
Watch my UK #johnnydepp trial analysis
Amber Heard INTERVIEW REACTION PART 1:
ua-cam.com/video/Bw015LP3gVQ/v-deo.html
JUROR SPEAKS OUT: REACTION:
ua-cam.com/video/g42oqjO9k6w/v-deo.html
UK Trial ANalysis:
PART 1:
ua-cam.com/video/iPfPG0qSERs/v-deo.html
Part 2:
ua-cam.com/video/OWMMcKVEaLA/v-deo.html
PART 3
ua-cam.com/video/pt4efD6uTJk/v-deo.html
Petition:
www.change.org/JusticeForJohnnyDeppUK
#JohnnyDepp Playlist:
ua-cam.com/play/PLOu1C4wHKjG56JEzgHzNjfbgyJfPzHa9Z.html
Also me: ua-cam.com/users/blackbeltsecrets
My wife's cooking: ua-cam.com/users/easychinesecooking
Respectively, you should put timestamps in the video, that 40 sec intro felt so long for me i almost quit the video 2 or 3 times but i was patient. I would have not thought about quitting if I saw a timestamp : 1) Intro 2) Video 3) end.
@Pianochick88 yeap unfortunately had to do that
She always says what felt like my eye or my this or that. She is clearly mentally ill and I don’t mean that in a bad way. AmberHeard needs a psychological intervention.
@@thoughtleader96 She absolutely mean everything in a bad way. She chose Delusion + no accountability + EGO + Arrogance and not accepting when not being wrong. She is in fault dont worry about that.
Thanks so much for the UK Trial Analysis. I haven't been able to find any of the UK Trial material.
What stuck with me was, if he was abusing her, why would she chase him down when he wanted to leave?
That makes zero sense.
Listening to the tapes, you could hear her trying to egg it on, trying to get him to react violently, which isn't Johnny's nature, and must have really pissed her off.
The blackmail paper's were very telling as well, that just screamed gold digger.
Its about possesion and control. I don't want that toy and discard it. But as soon as someone else shows interest it becomes, no thats mine (possesion) or loss of control. Childish Nursery school playground tactics/politics. Also by taking action means attention and contact/control with the desired object. Potentially a mentally unstable "if i cant play with it " then "nobody else will" danger.
Yes I did notice in court AH pointed to the wrong side of her face. I real victim does not forget where they were injured. This woman needs to be brought up on perjury charges
I definitely never forget which parts of my head were stamped on.
And you don't say "it felt like it hit" we know where things hit! I know where on my body injuries are
I agree with you!
@@surviving8316 That's horrific. I can only imagine what that's like.
More like assault charges...
AH is not done. She is relentless. She is ramping up for the next battle. Every time she opens her mouth she betrays herself and reveals her intentions. I feel everything needs to be completely taken apart and analyzed.
Please keep going.
Imagine having to cope with this if you were married to her. She'd never let an argument go until she won. Has she got a deeper psychiactric problem? Apart from the narciscism thing?
@UCtD-2nsKZg6jyUviLNfGnAg You have seen and heard it ONLY YOU, because all of us who have FOLLOWED THE WHOLE process HAVE NEVER SEEN NOR HEARED ANYTHING of what you wrote while the Nick name you gave yourself tells us a lot about you !!! Recover yourself and don't tell lies there is not enough a liar: the videos and audio tapes, even those that could not be seen by everyone, were ALL available to the jury and above all to the judge.!!!
I’m with you there. Amber doesn’t care what type of media attention she is getting be it good or negative she thrives upon it.
At this point she reminds me of Terminator.
She’s like my ex she’ll never stop a court order will need to be put in place were she can be locked up if she continues n even then if she gets a court order against her she’ll still try to push the boundaries there too my ex still tries to push boundaries now 8 yrs on despite an order in place narcs especially obsessed narcs never stop
She is essentially “stalking”Johnny with her inability to let him go!
And everyone assisting her by having her on talk shows is complicit!
She can't let him go. This is too much fun and play for her. She has no moral compass. What a lousy way to live.
Exactly! Could you imagine Bill Cosby or Harvey Weinstein being on talk shows after their trials! Why does she get a platform to lie about JD after losing in court because she will just keep doing it!
Her loyalists say JD “stalked her & constantly watched her on his cameras & is still stalking her.” 🤦🏻♀️
@@Mellyboowhowho projection…
well thats a stretch. she's not stalking him, she just thinks she so smart that she can convince the world to come to her side
"it felt like it hit me in the eye"
Trust me, if someone threw a phone at you with full force, you would know exactly where it hit you with certainty
She uses "Felt Like" many times during the trial. You can't argue with it. You can't say she didn't feel it. Right? She used so many weird made-up or learned tactics it's not funny. Very "Witchy" soul she has.
Another BIG sign of deception which is really prevalent in this instance, is when she shows the hand motion of the phone being thrown. She claims she didn't throw it, so why is she motioning as if she had? If it was actually thrown at her, she should have shown herself ducking or moving her head as though she been hit. A perfect example of this, is the hand motions and head movement that Johnny used when describing what happened when she threw the first bottle at him. He motioned his hand to show the bottle flying by his head, and moved his head out of the way, which is how he would have reacted in the moment when it happened.
Very good catch. She did that with the bottle demonstration too.
Yes! perfectly said
Also when she talks about being grabbed by her hair, she uses a gesture of her pulling and not her grabbing at her own head where she claimed to be grabbed. I thought it was very odd using gestures that show you doing the action.
I just mentioned this and now have scrolled to find yours. That really jumped at me. She can’t help but mime her own actions. Not from her supposed perspective as victim, cos it didn’t happen!
She does the same for the choking I think too. She doesn’t mine trying to remove hands from her throat…she mimes choking someone else.
And she mimes the act of head butting too…not the reaction to the head butt.
Even as she acts things out she is not the victim in the pantomime. She is the aggressor. She acts out the hits but not BEING hit.
When JD demonstrated something he is obvious in his position in the situation as he tried to explain it. That is what I expect from someone reenacting and explaining a situation from their memory.
I am a DV survivor. What I particularly look for are markings (or bruises) of a mentioned area. IF she was hit in the eye, not only would there be bruising,swelling and discolouration but there would be blood inside the whites of the eyes. PLUS there would have been a record of the findings from a hospital or optometrist or from any health specialist
A woman threw a whisky tumbler at me in 1982, it hit me on my left eyebrow, causing a gash, and a closed black eye. A thin bloodshot streak in the white, still there after 40 years.
I don’t necessarily think there would be blood in the whites of her eyes, that is from broken blood vessels in the eyes. It doesn’t happen to everyone. From just one incident I had very severe injuries requiring emergency surgery on my nose, septum and lips. A second nose surgery and had to wear splints on my teeth for about 6 months and have a root canal. I am still recovering and it was over a year and a half ago. I did get sort of black eyes, at least one but no blood in the whites of my eyes. The nerves of my nose, lips and teeth have not returned to normal. I still have pain and sort of a numb/tingling sensation all around the area.
But I guess you did say if she was hit IN the eye. Then you would probably be right.
with the way she describe what happen to her in her testimony i imagine she was in a coma with an unrecognizable face / in her last breath in hospital ,
not perfectly fine in the next day picture .
this is why you dont over exaggerate your testimony AH it backfired big and made your entire case not trustworthy at all 😂
Can you imagine the size of the lacerations from the rings on JD's fingers? Plus AH admitted in the audio the JD recorded that when JD walks away to de escalate it is the same as punching her.
@@anthonypreece6599 wasn't 2nd of november was it?
somebody should tell Amber Heard that her partner isn’t a source of income it’s a relationship not a job opportunity.
What? Wow, you nailed that perfectly. It’s exactly how she treated it.
It seems to me the job opportunity was the entire point for her.
edit- took out the part where I feel bad for her. Because I really don't. I feel bad for him.
LOL GOOD ONE
YAH WHEN SHE WAS AUDITIONING WITH JOHNNY FOR HIS FRIENDS BOOK AND MOVIE ROLL RUM DIARY SHE WAS PROBABLY WORKING ON AUDITIONING FOR THE ROLE TO BE WITH JOHNNY AS THE ONE WOMAN SHOW OF MAN EATING GOLD DIGGER LOL
A career move that required instant inclusion in the Will and no pre nup post nup agreement. Enter the rage
The “ aging “ of the bruise doesn’t correspond to a facial impact bruise that was supposed to be 6 days old when she filed for the TRO in the Courthouse. Those pictures show a red fresh bruise and that’s not what she would have after 6 days
None of her bruises ever looked like bruises. A bruise is mot only discoloration...especially in the face...there should be swelling too
She probably ran out of blue in her bruise kit.
True! Good point!
Dont worry the next day she didnt have nothing in her face 😆😆
Bruise? It was just fake up
She admitted, by accident, that she used a "bruise kit" which is theatrical makeup to MAKE bruises, not to hide them. She totally gave herself away!
JD noticed n smiled...she is awful at everything.
This was actually one of her more obvious slip ups, if I were JD I’d be continuing to do more of the same and ignore everything that she does from here in the woman is clearly very troubled 😕
Most dope heads are...
she also said that was what she called it---I hate Amber and I am glad she lost but lets not take things out of context. She said she called it her bruise kit because she used it to cover bruises
@@r613-v7y but it does not cover bruises; it makes bruises that the next day totally were gone!
She also stated in court that she has never called herself a victim nor want anyone to say that. But yet in the tell all she clearly calls herself a victim. This lady is crazy and needs help.
She needs time out in a cage to self reflect
💯
She is not a Lady ….
She overreacted to that too, like she is thinking "I'm a SURVIVOR, not a VICTIM". It was eerily similar to the part in the Jussie Smollett interview where he tried to emphasize how much he "fought back" to show he wasn't some pushover. I haven't seen people who have really been victims of violence overreact quite that way to someone calling them a victim. They might say they don't think about themselves that way, but there is a different connotation. It's more like a positive statement that they are making to affirm their own self image, not attempting to boast or brag or glorify themselves.
sick chick
She went to the court house for that restraining order one week after Johnny left the country. He was not going to be there again for a few months and she new it.
I feel that talking about it cannot be done too much until we start acknowledging that it's abuse not just female getting abused but males getting abused and because mainstream media won't acknowledge it we have to keep putting it out there
I agree but careful not just change guard's uniform 😉
I don't think its quite true to say that MSM isn't acknowledging male abuse; I have heard it mentioned quite a few times now. I also think that this is a reflection of society which we all (majority) often participate in minimizing abuse of all kinds.
1993 movie, Men Don't Tell starring Peter Strauss and Judith Light (on you tube)
I have noticed that no MSM outlet has dared to go near the female on male domestic violence. It is like it does not exist. I think it may be due to the fact that the domestic violence industry has a lot of important financial stake holders and the MSM always sides with not rocking the boat. Billions of tax dollars are given away to NGOs and government agencies under the guise of the male on female domestic violence model. It is like when Henry Ford introduced the Model T, the horse centric industry fought tooth and nail. A lot of women are waking up because abused men are their brothers, fathers, sons, nephews and so on.
Compared the Guardian's deluge of opinion pieces on the 'Holocaust" of misogyny that the jury found Heard defamed Depp to their complete and utter silence on the 800+ child rapists who have had all charges dropped as they supposedly "apologised".
This was exactly what I said watching live. She had a “ mark” on her right cheek, but motioned to her left. There was also testimony where she was claiming JD threw a glass at her, but her hand motions did the action of throwing the glass instead of dodging the glass. Thank you for your breakdown, I didnt catch the shrug, I just thought her arm was awkward at the throwing motion.
It could be possible that the photograph could be flopped.
@@PhantomFilmAustralia TMZ was tipped to get the right side of her face
Same with her describing the bottle she threw. She said it was him. She thinks everyone else is stupid. When she described the bottle, she said he was holding it when she was motioning she was holding it. Saying did you drink all of this. Amber is a horrible LIAR
Dude was gone six days. He left the day after his mom died and had to go right away to the premiere in Spain... He wasn't thinking about her. Then she does the lawyer threat letter she knows he can't respond/show up cause he's gone. Files for divorce, THEN LATER, files for the TRO. Changes his locks and around midnight has Franco up. Like her friend and feebie neighbor Josh said, over 30 as he knows off WHILE they were married. But she was in fear? Wanted to stay where she was abused? She's so independent, a star, progressive woman hear me roar but no better than poor me, I need a man to get anything. This is global BS to move legal agendas against men, these women moving these cases across ponds aren't smart enough to get where they've gotten. This shouldn't have gotten a TRO, period. No ER reports, bum friends never took her to a hospital, other shelter, support group, police precinct, victims servies in Hollywood? All those friends and she didn't have a place to live away from there? And no one has mentioned how she was with the kids, which pisses me off. She's sitting there with a kid she couldn't be bothered to have (seems that way since the trial too, she'd come out better just being a mom than what she's doing now without her); whose dad fought to have the embryos destroyed, who's rich and lost? Nah, this is global emasculation of men, all around. It doesn't make sense. She has a PR that sexually harassment/allegedly assaulted several women? Come on, wha'ts going on here? And all those bringing cases use the same lawyers, people? I don't know if the dudes are in on it too cause I know, from the audios, and not being a man, she would have been underground within 15 minutes or met with an unfortuanate accident while I was off shooting/filming in another country.
@@aligaines8476 "This shouldn't have gotten a TRO, period." Absolutely! "No ER reports." And "stay where she was abused?" And so many other great points!
The fact that she constantly directed her answers to the jury as opposed to looking at the attorney who was questioning her was a sign that she was trying to get the jurors to believe what she was saying, along with her display of annoying facial expressions. it truly came across as a way to get the jurors on her side. Anyone could see that it was part of her acting skills.
Although I sometimes question her acting skills in this trial. See: "my dog stepped on a bee" and the following facial expressions
She was setting Depp up from the very beginning. She’s relentless and won’t stop until she’s in jail. She’s released some ‘doctor’s’ notes now that weren’t allowed in court, as the judge said they were here say. I’m getting really bewildered now how she just won’t let it go. Johnny cleared his name in court but still she is defaming him. It’s not fair.
She'd look nice in orange color behind bars. I'm sorry that might not be nice but what she is doing needs to stop.
She sure did. I said same thing. She set him up from the beginning
Therapist's notes, not doctor's medical notes. What she said to her therapist and not admissible, and even they look a bit suspicious to me. Considering how fast Amber talks, that writing would be impossible to do in the time. The therapist would surely use some type of shorthand to keep up!
I agree….she seduced him on the set of The Tourist with an end game in mind…..a true predator
She won’t stop even after she’s in jail.
The one part of the trial that proved she was lying was when the TMZ employee came on to say that they had obtained permission from the copyright owner to publish the video. Surely if Amber hadn’t give permission she would have sued TMZ for publishing the video. 🤷♂️
Actually, this is a very key point.. You own the Copyright if recorded on your device. Camille Vasquez stated that TMZ now owned the Copyright. The only way that ownership would shift, is if Amber Heard SOLD the Video to TMZ. That in itself is enough evidence. Its a shame the excellent Miss Vasquez did not push that point further. Amber Heard really needs to be brought to account & serve some time. That seems to be the only way to teach her a lesson.
The TMZ guy also stated that it can takes days, weeks or even Months to track down, and obtain copyright from the owner of any footage/photos etc.
He stated it took 15 minutes to obtain copyright ownership from the owner of the footage, the guy stated that copyright ownership can only be obtained that quickly is if the owner is in contact with them, sends them the footage/images and signs off the copyright ownership to them.
Hence, this came directly from the source.
Amber Heard.
Yea and she makes it sound like 'How could she? She was on the plane' ummmmm there's WiFi on the plane and there has been for several years. So yes, she could have sent it from the plane.
That and she never stated, "I want to know who leaked footage from MY phone." Who has private media leaked and doesn't mention feeling betrayed or exploited? Just cannot stop lying.
@@jamiem6562 And sending a dropbox link literally takes less than 60 seconds. They really tried to act like we're stupid people who do not use technology.
To me the key gesture is she makes the action of throwing the phone, not the phone coming at her as Johnny does when he describes when Amber threw the bottles at him in Australia. She doesn’t realize it but she’s telegraphing that she’s the aggressor.
Authenticthreads -
Great comment & great observation!
👍👍👍
Yes that is also a red flag to me also, there are a few like this throughout the trial. 👍🏼
@@sharonkenyon531 Ambuser Turd could be Communist China on parade day she has so much red flags
also what she describes is there is a time for her to move her head, normally if something thrown at you, especially you have seen it coming from the very beginning, you just move your head to doge it.
@Michelle Doyle lol yes, that is what this video points out
Yes, I noticed that she gestured toward her left eye although the other side was supposedly injured. And what's huge about that to me is if you're talking about what you felt you certainly wouldn't go to the wrong side. You would be remembering the feeling when the phone hit so you would automatically point to where you felt it.
Yes I saw that immediately when watching the trial live.
When she stops and adds “-what /felt/ like my eye” signaled to me that she is trying to avoid a definitive statement “the phone hit my eye.” Instead of saying that the phone absolutely hit her eye, she says “it felt like” it did. We can’t tell her what she “felt”, I think she was hoping that adding those words would save her. If she said “it hit me in this eye”- that’s black and white and there’s no wiggle room if she gets caught lying. So she falls on the “well it felt like my eye”, right in this safe grey area.
Please help the guy get his UK trial re tried!!
She is used to looking at photos of herself and remembers the pictures instead of the event itself - because the event did not happen. Gesturing to the wrong side is a definite tell, IMHO.
Remembers in mirror image
She’s the kind of person that would harm herself just to prove a point.
I think she did it - 2012 photo split lip. That's whatshe does...
Be our guest !!
Absolutely!!
nah, she'd get a surrogate.
Taz,
Yup, that's coming next...wait for it!
When she did that in court, I was yelling at my computer that she's pointing to the wrong side! I couldn't believe what I was seeing. Another big tell.
Her testimony only ensures all who followed this trial that she's a chronic liar - and those analysis just ensure this opinion more and more...
She should be charged with contempt of court and Johnny Depp should be given a restraining order against her and any contact or coming within 100miles of him or anyone connected with him. She should be behind bars preferably with a straight jacket on and men in white coats
and the baby should be followed by a child protection service
I noticed that pointing to the other cheek during the trial. Believe me, when a loved one betrays you with violence, you don’t ever make that mistake. The emotional scar becomes almost muscle memory of touching where you were struck.
I noticed this too at the time she testified. This is the first person that I've heard mention it. Very telling.
I also noticed and wondered why she was gesturing to the opposite side of her face. People don’t tell stories of things that really happened to them and get the FACTS wrong!
Exactly you don't forget what they put you through and your story doesn't change...
She was "acting" with a "stage" punch/impact, which doesn't hurt, so no pain memory.
If I am not mistaken this happened years ago. And also, this is the face, not a knee. You only see it in the mirror. Which could confuse a person. How she said it was more telling.
I wrote this quote down from her interview the other night because it really stood out to me as a survivor myself. I had to go back and pause several times so I could get it verbatim: “when your life is at risk, not only will you take the blame for things that you shouldn’t take the blame for, but when you are in an ABUSIVE DYNAMIC psychologically, emotionally and physically, you don’t have the resources THAT YOU OR I DO with the luxury of saying ‘hey it’s black and white”. I take issue first of all with the repositioning of blame. To me, she is trying to shift from a he was abusive and I was not at fault at all argument, to a “well it was a toxic relationship so there is fault on both sides”. Damage limitation. My abuser did this to me when I left him. He wrote letters to my close family and friends stating we were just in a toxic relationship, making it out like it was a two-way thing to deflect blame from him. And the really telling thing here is her saying to the interviewer that people who are abused don’t have the resources of those who haven’t been abused - the use of “you or I” so she is not seeing herself as someone who was abused and is aligning herself with someone she assumes hasn’t been either. She does not speak for abuse survivors because she isn’t one. It’s sickening.
Yeah the "you or I" was her biggest slip up over this whole thing, potentially bigger than "TMZ, who was notified"
A.H Is A narcissistic sociopath lying gaslighting coldhearted evil ABUSIVE women . Amber Turd DOES. NOT speak for Abuse Victims Or victims of violence of any kind … PERIODT!!!!!
You're aware the NBC, when they aired the full interview, cut the "you or I" part, so it had her saying "you don't have the resources of saying "hey, it's black and white". I wonder who made that decision and why? Because the full clip had already been aired.
Learned and skilled people like you are hope for people like us who are genuine DV survivors. You’ve pointed very accurately many facts about this case in the UK trial and your observations on the US trial are spot on! I, and most of us, have also noticed many such gestures, facial expressions/contortions, body language and multi speak (for the lack of a better expression) and found her so obscenely dishonest. It would be a travesty of justice if the dialogue doesn’t continue. She should be made accountable and punished for her evil deeds.
Thank you for your relentless efforts and informative videos. We’re with you.
A hit in the eye - you would know, and remember. A projectile to the face without any response to deflect would also be rare. Thanks for spotlighting this gem.
This! This is exactly what I was thinking when she was testifying. She also doesn't describe what happened in detail. One would think that she'd be able to describe things like which part of the phone hit her and how, ie "the corner of the phone hit my cheek" or "the phone hit flat against my face", etc. If you listen to her accounts of the attacks she says she suffered, you'll realize that she is missing a shocking amount of details. She says a lot that sound like details but are actually vague generalities more often than not.
Just like when she "owned up" to her behavior in that recent interview "Oh yeah I've been so ambiguously horrible and toxic, done all sort of... uh nondescript things." We know, Amber, we know all the shit you've done the idea was for you to actually own up to even one single event, but no she couldn't even do that.
What she never took into the equation when planning to frame Johnny is that he is in his late 50,s.He had a clean record until he met her in spite of admitting to addiction to pain killers ( this never affected his behaviour) All his past girlfriends, his children, his family and friends had the same description of him.A gentle soul, kind, caring ,very protective and very generous as well as being a fantastic actor.She on the other hand has a string of past aggression towards family and friends and partners That's why I won't believe Johnny was toxic.He had to defend himself all the time and she kept him from his loved ones whilst moving her family and friends into Johnny's Penthouses They lived off him,paid nothing whilst all calling him a monster and plotting with her Josh Drew seemed the most honest.
@@loati94 not only did she not mention pain, but she downplayed the pain and the bruises. The 1st time he "slapped" 3 times and she said "I wish he had said he was joking, because it didn't hurt, it didn't physically hurt".... it's been a few decades since my last slap but I remember the sting of it (like an echo 🤣)
Or when Camille ask her about her face with no swelling (after being punches repeatedly) she said she used ice and the swelling isn't that bad in those kind of attack and for her it wasn't that swollen at all.... 😳 has she ever seen a face after a SINGLE punch!?! My sister-in-law was punched on the cheek, a single punch, and the entire left part of her face was grotesquely swollen, eye closed up, red from a few busting veins.... you couldn't look at her and not feel distressed even though she started the fight... allegedly. Swollen for about 2 weeks and it took a few months before make-up could effectively cover it up.
When she said that I was screaming at my phone in JD voice "don't tell us what it looks like to be punched!!!!"
Agreed. Whenever she was on the stand talking about Johnny "attacking" her, it was always in very general "he was hitting and hitting me" or "Johnny grabbed me by the hair and just kept punching me: etc. She never actually gave any direct, full descriptions of any of the alleged attacks. I found that very disturbing about all of her accounts. No full, complete details...just general descriptions.
I agree with this. I specialise in HR investigations and do a lot of them, and I too have learned to spot the "tells" of deception which are very much as you describe. Truthful responses are short, to the point and don't come with fluffy narrative. People creating a story inadvertently fall into the trap of over-embellishing the narrative, feeling that it will somehow make their account more credible. Of course, I can never base a finding on body language, but it is a great signpost for where to go scratch at the story!
Telling vs selling
YAH AND NECK JERK REACTIONS TURNING TO THE JURY TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONERS QUESTIONS WHAT A ......
All her body cues are wrong. She does not realize that the human body never forgets trauma. It becomes etched, sometimes it is then packed away, or manifests in other more destructive ways. Nevertheless the body will remember and will spring it on trauma victims unawares.
I’m not so sure about this. I have experienced having had to do a lot of explaining to clear up misunderstandings, and feeling as I’m explaining that it looks like I’m lying even though I’m being truthful.
@@j.j.1064 Thanks! I can only talk from my own experience which is that, when something signals that a particular line of narrative warrants closer examination, more often than not an inconsistency is revealed. As I said originally, I'm not suggesting making a determination or finding based on such a signal, simply that it's something that catches my attention that will often result in the discovery of some inconsistency or concealment. The JCSPsychology channel here on UA-cam has some good analysis on police interviews and the topic of truthful vs non-truthful signposts pops up regularly. I'm not sure about logical fallacies, but it certainly would be true that there are many cognitive biases which one must be aware of and cautious not to succumb to in such a situation. Gladwell references truth-default theory a lot but in my view this theory does not have that solid a foundation - indeed Hanlon's Razor is an aphorism arising from the tendency to distrust - the assumption of malice.
It felt, to me, that she kept qualifying with those “I feel” statements because you can’t falsify a feeling. She’s trying to protect herself from being caught in a lie. E.g. if in cross-examination she was asked “but you weren’t hit in the eye, were you?” she thinks she can say “that’s what it felt like to me”.
Like someone else pointed out, whenever he left to escape her, she used words and emotional blackmail that made it sound like him walking away was him physically abusing her, and maybe it does feel like that someone with her conditions, but that doesn't make it reality.
Exactly. Anyone who was hit in the eye, would say, he hit me in the eye, and point at the right bloody one.
@@xRainbowCloud To be clear, I don’t agree with her in anyway. I think she was being weaselly by framing it in that way.
Agreed. She did the same with the 2 versions of the face picture. Something like "It looks to me like the different light was turned on, you know, those makeup lights", so she couldn't be done for perjury.
This night , Johnny asked his bodyguard to wait just outside the door. When he was aware of a physical event, something like, “stop hitting me!”, he rushed in and saw nothing of the sort. It wasn’t a physical fight. Amber was doing her dramatic rant and it was for anyone in earshot. However, she was not aware the bodyguards were outside, and was amazed to see them. The best thing she could come up with then and there, was that Johnny threw a phone. I don’t see the logic of him throwing his own phone and busting it. So he purportedly grabbed Amber’s phone from (typically) her hand, BACKED UP and threw it. Because what is the point of throwing the phone from a foot away? Just hit her. But no, grab something handy. Anything. I am saying, draw this quick move and break it down. I want to know if people throw a phone to hurt someone. It won’t fly through the air like a ball. Who knows. Everybody grab an old phone and throw it. I bet it is uncontrollable. She said “phone”, because the bodyguard was there immediately to protect Johnny, but there was nothing to see. She had not yet thrown a bottle, or spilled the wine( in the hallway! nice. Just have the hallway carpet cleaned) The police body cameras did not ‘capture’ any spilled wine. Explain that! JD had already left. So if the wine was not spilt, and JD is in NYC, AH is ready for her close-up. She is getting a restraining order to protect her from a man who will be in Europe for three months.
We should carry on talking about this while she still gallivants around the telly stated how bad the judgement was and we shouldn't stop until people treat her correctly as the guilty party of the court case.
If she was a man she would be blacklisted from all these media outlets she's chatting *BS* to.
Amber is being given airtime simply to create chaos. Keep in mind who owns the media and you can easily understand why. It's another sign of the times. And, no doubt, it's not going away any time soon either. So put on your seatbelts, "It's going to be a bumpy ride." (Bette Davis)
All I hear when she speaks is blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
The thing is, this is not over with Amber Heard and Johnny Depp. She is still trying to appeal and she still is talking about him abusing her regardless of the ruling. This is an ongoing situation that we should talk about.
Amber's body language is very evident. no abused person behaves that way. Those of us who have suffered abuse in our lives have very easy and spontaneous emotions. we have a hard time hiding fear and pain. Amber inadvertently declared, having a kit to make/paint, blows. there is a video of the court, which we can listen to her testimony.
Especially the way that she acted when she was leaving the stand but didn't fully realize that JD was there as he and his party were leaving as court was dismissed.
The trial is over. The world can see how full of shit she is, we're all agreed there.
What is not helpful is weighing in with "oh, I don't think an abuse victim would behave like this", "an abuse victim would remember that".
Regardless of the fact that Heard specifically is discredited - and not before time - given neither you nor I are experts in domestic abuse, I don't think it helps anyone - least of all people who may have actually experienced domestic abuse and have to give evidence one day - to let them know people will be picking apart their mannerisms to make "well, I reckon" conclusions about their honesty.
if you have make up to hide the evidential blows, you also have makeup to create them as well
You mean the "bruise kit" when she accidentally 🤣 says my bruise kit, I mean my theatre make up kit, which "I called my bruise kit" and us "average" people as she just call us were like, WHAT? She just slipped right there, but Johnny's lawyers didn't notice in the court in that moment
@@guaytambitabella2568 yesss
Wife pointed out that her cheeks looked bruised when being cross examined.
Ms Turd is a real piece of work.
That’s from her Joan Crawford grotesque cheek implants. 😂
One more detail:
The demonstration she makes with her arm when she is describing Johnny allegedly throwing the phone at her is far more convincing and natural than - what you are pointing out - her demonstration of the phone hitting her eye.
I’m no expert but too me it makes me think that she is recalling one of the many times that SHE - in my opinion - has thrown something at Johnny…
In that moment, she also shakes her head "NO" when she says it... Denial... Her brain knows it's false... Plus, a cell phone is HEAVY... One would need some EXPERT aim (as one would if throwing an axe) to be able to know how to throw a phone and hit a specific target...
Yup she did that while describing all the things. Acting out the motions of the aggressor instead of the victim, in all the scenarios the describes.
Have you guys seen the info that Johnny’s mom used to throw the phone at him? Perhaps that is what is being recalled?
@@RAe-om3ld good point. In many instances she has stolen others stories to pedal as her own. The instances with her previous assistant and also the story from Evan Rachel Wood.
@@the_mum
Also Rhianna
Well said, as always. - I most heartedly agree that we DO need to continue talking about this (for at least as long as she continues to do so), precisely because of the very serious nature of what she not only attempted to perpetuate, but very nearly DID. Were it NOT for the cameras in the court, to allow the public to see certain aspects firsthand, we might never have really known the truth. And it is only important for the public to know in so much as it shows what is POSSIBLE for someone to do and get away with. It is fundamentally wrong, and shows another area of weakness in our legal system, I think.
She won't stop ,she can't stop ,this is who she is !She thrives on constant friction ,argueing and aggression !
Yes, thank you! So many times she referred to something and then doesn't follow thru with what one would expect a natural body reaction to be. This is a perfect example , its the wrong damn cheek!.. A true victim wouldn't mistake which cheek had been hit!
it's more than memory. The SENSATION of being struck, the swelling, the injury being painful and carefully attended to for the next few days remains. She also claimed to conceal the bruises at all times with makeup; how could she gesture to the left cheek when she felt every stroke of the brush on her injured and sensitive right cheek? Even without the shoulder shrug, can conclude that she was lying.
@@edwardh50g And of course the day she was at court and had alerted TMZ (which she has also lied about) for paparazzi to be present, she had a "bruise" not concealed, and moved her head to display it for the cameras as TMZ worker said she was expected to do. She also gave away about her bruise kit, changed the wording when she slipped up.
@@mizofan Yeah, "This is my bruise kit, because unlike everybody else in my industry I refer to a bruise kit as something to cover up bruises not to apply them. You will obviously believe me because I am such a great actress so nobody is going to think I slipped up there"
Absolutely logical and fact based. No way I can tell you last month I broke my right arm and lift the left arm while saying it. I really wish in the furure you have the time to break down every single incident because there are SO MANY that went unnoticed.
Thank you Sir 👍
She's not recalling something that happened to her so she got her story wrong. Amazing.
I’m so glad you called out her referencing the wrong side of her face. I noticed and no one was talking about it
I'm so glad you pointed this out!
I saw the same thing, and I think I noticed it unconsciously, but after you pointed it out...
You're definitely right!
This trial has been hashed over and rehashed, but I don't see anyone talking about that, and that is a definite sign of deception.
She's not "recalling an incident."
If she was, she would have pointed to the right (correct) cheek!
My vote is for you to keep talking about this case. I watched most of it on youtube, and so I find it fascinating to hear your legal analysis and compare it to my own 'reasonable member of the public' view of what I saw.
Agreed! Love Daniel's logic - he is so down to earth whilst being highly intelligent and has expierence to back it.👍🏻❣️
I agree too !
One lie runs into another lie into another lie into another lie. I think she starts off with the intention of one lie but then exaggerates it which sends her off on a lying spree with no option to turn back. She is a compulsive liar and I don’t believe she believes it. She knows it’s lies but doubles down anyway because she would rather dig her heels in than admit defeat.
In an audio when JD accused her of lying to the security guard after she punched him. She finally admitted the punch (even if she refuses to call it a punch) but not the lie. He said I watch you lie and she lose her mind and refuses to admit it.
I was kind of like that as a kid. I could confess any wrong doings but never a lie. Nothing was worse and more humiliating to me than to be caught on a lie. It still is, I think. That's why I never lie. Plus I have a very bad memory, nothing is easier to tell and remember than the truth.
@@lilyluh You have to have a good memory to be a liar. She has told that many lies I dare say if the trial was re-run again it would be a completely new set of lies but with the same end spin. Just a different route to the end spin. She clearly refuses to accept defeat and to blatantly spin in front of millions of ppl on TV with no signs of any remorse speaks volumes about her dark personality. It’s confession through projection and I hope she pays every day for the rest of her life but I do hope she has ppl in her life with integrity who would be a good influence on her child. I fear what type of environment and what impression she will make on that child with her being a narcissist.
After a month went by Johnny not being there. He and two body guards went up so he could pick up a few things. He tossed the phone on the couch, went into the kitchen area. She started yelling 'stop hitting me' (something like that) The guards came in and saw they were far from each other. They had Johnny get what he needed and they left. Only being there half an hour. She's such a liar on all levels ...
Try, all levels . She can’t stop lying.
@@roberthampton6438 Yes, you're right 🙂👍
There was one part in her recording she was yelling at johnny to stop pushing her to the wall and Johnny was like "Amber I'm not pushing you"
And in her UK testimony she put her hand to her right eye. Seemed strange. Of course, she was lying. Thankyou for your legal view. Always illuminating!
#AbuseHasNoGender
#IStandWithJohnnyDepp
#JohnnyDeppGotJustice
#JohnnyDeppKeepsWinning
She pointed at the left side of her face when she described where the phone hit her during her court testimony, yet in her now infamous appearance at court in 2016, her "bruise" appears fresh [even after 6 days after the alleged incident] on her right cheek.
This makes me laugh because it’s so true, the cruel narcissist I was with tripped in our local park and decided to claim compensation from the council by faking injury during the claim he had to go and see an independent physician he came back feeling pretty pleased with himself, I can’t remember how long it was before he found out he had the doctor examine the wrong ankle. I got the blame, which wasn’t unusual, but despite his temper I still couldn’t stop laughing on the inside that he had made such an idiot of himself.
They tend to see themselves as superior because they see other people as constrained by moral scruples whereas they themselves are not.
Yes, he did make an idiot of himself. However, I hope you have found happiness away from him now.
That is an excellent story. All of AH’s lies are coming back to haunt her. Yet she still keeps running her mouth. I think they should have cuffed her after the trial because she admitted she assaulted Depp. Then she would be in jail and no one would have to hear all of the lies on top of lies at least not on TV. When she got on the stand the final last time she said “that’s why. I wrote the Op Ed due to all his power” but in the interview she says “the Op Ed was never about Johnny”. And the sad part is they give her the questions in advance so planned that response. If I was Savannah, I would have called her on that one and I would have said, you do realize you totally lost the case in statement because that was what the trial was all about and you did Depp’s job of proving you defamed him. She is so idiotic and truthfully has completely lost track of all her lies and reality.
@@bonitameredith8991 She's grossly entitled, probably thinks she is clever, but is actually surprisingly dumb, unaware of the effect of inconsistencies in her poor-harmless-me tales of woe that are not backed up with physical evidence of injuries.
Contrast that to Depp responding totally straight about everything.
😃 😆 🤣 😂 👍
Yes! I caught it immediately. She pointed to her left side in court and her apparent bruise was on her right side. Again, one is easily led to believe she lied about getting the hit. Thank you highlighting the fact. I’m glad others recognized the difference.
I was accidentally hit by a basketball on the left side of my face which gave me a really bad bruise right below my outer eyebrow. That incident wasn't even particularly traumatic. It was just an accident that had happened to me over 10 years ago. But if you ask me about it now, my body would still naturally point to where the bruise was cause my body would just remember it by instinct. That's just stuff that you almost never get wrong.
The last thing she said on the stand was how she wanted it all to be over, and she just WANTED TO BE LEFT ALONE! She whinged about how JD wouldn't leave her alone .. Yet here she is. STILL GOING.
Just another BS LIE!!
She said and did this in her court testimony also and I questioned it then but no one took it up. THANKYOU for your commenting on it Sir 👍👏👏👏👏👏
The most revealing point in this trial for me and my refuge sisters ; who have survived violence, was the carpet reference. None of us, when in an actual state of fight or flight, or freezing in fear during violence, would have the head space to even notice the condition of the carpet. Drug use would be my only suggestion for this creativity but on the whole, to me, that narrative does not and did not stack up, at all. The carpets are the last thing you would be worrying about in those moments , it’s chaos 🙏
Very true and insightful. In moments of violence you are just trying to survive and it’s fight/ flight so your brain doesn’t often notice little insignificant things.
Yes!! So true 💯
And how many survivors say they still love the man who raped them with a broken bottle? And refer to the situation as both Ugly and Beautiful? And why is she pretending to write at the table? Donate vs pledge and she shouldn't have to donate for people to believe that she did? Clip of her "oh no" covering her mouth because she slipped that she notified TMZ in previous interviews... the list goes on and on.... she wants to keep Depp engaged and the rest of us transfixed! Parakeet floors, file rank? ARGHHH if she doesn't shut up soon the only work she will get will be in adult films....
Amber Heard is said to read a lot. I read some, too. And writers often go into details like that because it paints a picture in the reader’s mind. My guess is that she was emulating that writing technique. She did it in other instances, too. Like when JD “threw” her across the floor and while she was sliding on the floor, she noticed how beautiful the wooden floor was.
@@catscattying the parakeet floors?
I do remember thinking when she described this incident that " it felt like my eye". If I was describing it after the fact I would know exactly where it hit. It feels like she is entwining how one might feel in the moment vs the actual event. Ergo acting word salad 😒
I love your channel, found u through popcorned planet.. u are so spot on, living in the UK I really hope we can hope we can right this wrong for JD and real survivors- whatever gender where ever they live x
THAT'S HOW I FOUND THIS TOO. HE'S GOOD RT ?
Yes found you through popcorned planet as well and I'm subscribed and you're one of my go to favorites now. Along with your analysis of this trial and the connection to narcissistic behaviors creating so much trouble for people you could easily jump over to Meghan and Harry and the narcissistic world they live in 😆
Very good observations. I never noticed her hand pointing to the left eye, then the bruising being on the right eye. I hope you continue to point things out to us!
The one that got me in the trial, was when she 'accidentally' mentioned her bruise kit!!! I don't remember everything off hand, but she may have said something to the effect that she got her bruise kit, but immediately changed her slip-up, to something like she meant her make-up kit. I wish I could recall her wording exactly, but at the time she said that I was shocked!
The fact that it wasn’t even the same side of her face is very telling… when I’ve been hurt and go to the doctor retelling/enacting what happened for me to get hurt; even after I’m healed I point and motion to the same area that was hurt originally it’s like a natural reaction when it’s actually occurred…You just remember
And she's done that more than once. If it had actually happened to her (which it DIDN'T) she would NEVER FORGET EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED TO AND WHERE.
Exactly! Like the part where she says it hit what felt like my eye?!!! How would you have to guess at this?! I was abused and was hit with a beer bottle in the right eyebrow/cheek bone area and I can definitely remember that. She sickens me with all his because I was abused for ten years by my alcoholic husband and I can probably recount every single incident vividly if someone were to ask me. You don't forget these things when they actually happen to you.
The whole trial was an act.
I really enjoy the way you explain things. Lies need to be dismantled systematically with clear language by legal professionals. This way we know justice stands a chance in this society.
I quite agree. But I am sadly coming to the conclusion that the word truth has become tarnished by so many twisting it to suit their own ends.
In short: Truth is now a dirty word. And we are all becoming victims as a result.
I noticed the left-gesture thing when I first saw her testimony. (I was a ballet dancer, so am conditioned to mentally reversing demonstrations of choreography or what I see in the mirror.) I did feel it could be because of lying.
I also imagined it could be because she is performing for the jury, off to her oblique right, and automatically/subconsciously (as an actress) doesn't want to cover her face with her hand. Yet even that indicates she's constantly aware that she is "performing" her testimony.
She forgot that she had been practising in a mirror.
I wouldnt qualify her as an actress, frankly.
Yes I agree. It's such a shame for her that she's a crap actor.
Youre giving her too much credit. Our thoughts and memories go all with gestures, but I understand your theory.
It could be either she forgot what side she fabricated an injury, (because it was fabricated) or just as possible, the photograph of her has been flopped.
TWO THINGS struck me about her testimony of this incident:
1. The inconsistency in the position of the "injury" she said she sustained during the alleged phone incident. I picked up almost instantly that, while on the stand, she indicated using her left hand that the phone had hit her by her left eye/left side of her face. However, the "injury" is supposedly on the right side of her face according to her photos. If you have an injury, old or current, and you're referring to it, you'll always point to the actual position of that very injury no matter how old it is.
2. The bold and almost "look at me" manner in which she sported her "injury" in front of the courthouse. People who are visibly injured as a result of DV tend to hide their injuries and/or try to disguise themselves from the public. When I listened to her testimony on the stand, she claimed to not want "it" to get out there. YET, in her photos, she was standing tall with her chin held high, sporting the "injury" and not cowering or making ANY attempt to hide from the media at all.
THOSE TWO inconsistencies are what made me doubt her testimony on that incident.
I’m a nurse practitioner and people do this all the time. They point to the injured body part, so I can usually guess where the injury is. Great catch!
In all of her testimony she used phrases as disclaimers so she wouldn't be caught in a direct lie, or perceived as lying: I thought at the time, I remember, I can't remember, I think it was about, and the big one: It felt like. She used that line a lot, especially surrounding abuses to her body. Convenient when she turns out to be incorrect, isn't it? Love your channel. Thanks so much.
Exactly!! I pointed this out in a different post. Common Sense and Critical Thinking! Something the Quackeroo's that are still supporting her lack!
EXACTLY!
"My nose was broken" turned into *"It felt like* my nose was broken"
@@markusgorelli5278 yes!! It felt like my nose was broken, it felt like a broken bottle, it felt like it hit my eye.... all potentially very serious injuries but she never felt *the need* to go the hospital! And she never once said she was scared to see a doctor, just that she didn't need it.
@@markusgorelli5278 Didn't she say something like "I thought I had a concussion and I was certain I had a broken nose" which became "yes, I thought my nose was certainly broken" or some other twisting of words when it was picked up in cross.
So she was trying to claim that just because she had used "thought" in the previous statement that carried over to everything that followed. The problem for her is it just looks really bad when she has to jump through hoops like that to get out of a lie.
I feel like everyone should set a week of not talking about Amber and see how desperate she is for attention.
YUP IT WOULD DRIVE HER BAT SHIT CRAZY OH WAIT SHE ALREADY IS LOL
Let's keep talking about this. It's highly educational about jurisprudence and being detail oriented with witnesses.
Whenever she describes an injury, she ALWAYS says "felt like" that is uncertainty
PLEASE! As a woman, investigate the timeliness, allegation of how he "dragged me through broken glass and my feet were sliced up." Then within 24? Hours or kess she was on a talk show/event with 4 inch heels. How did she get jnjured feet to walk in heels??????
In the recording of Dr. Kipper and nurse Debbie in Australia you can hear AH walking around in heels. How could she have possibly been wearing heels if her feet had glass in them?
Than you! Camille missed that one.
Whoever told her to do the interview it was a disaster and now a jury member comes forward and tells it like it is. It destroyed her entire interview. I told ppl In that part of VA, some ppl do not do social media, YT, at all. So for her to say social media played a part I knew that was a lie. Ex my husband has never had one social media account he can’t stand it. There are a lot of ppl who feel the same. But it came down to credibility and AH is not credible. There were just to many lies that she told that ended up being debunked. And yet she is still in denial. 😳🙄
Right!!
She has no shame & doesn’t care how much evidence there is against her & how many witnesses & how much she’s been debunked!!
She just keeps on & on & refuses to stop trying to explain her lies, proving how guilty she truly is!!!
Did you notice that when she testified about getting hit by the phone she pointed to the left side of her face, but the courthouse video showed the bruise on the right side of her face. I don’t think I would forget which side was injured. Also, if Johnny is right handed and was facing her, it’s likely it would have been the left side. But the bruise was on the right. By the way, I also posted this yesterday.
I feel someone should have had a cotton wool swab with make up remover on and wipe the bruise kit off her in public She had no bruises except for when she had Botox or her cheekbones enhanced
The only time he might have used a different hand is post finger cut but her story just doesn't add up at all and I definitely noticed she actioned the phone hitting the opposite side from her "bruise" 🤦♀
@YT Morgan Tremaine also testified that the paparazzi knew the bruise would be on the right side of her face, so those images aren’t flipped
@YT none of her bruised photos were mirrored, you can tell because her face isn’t perfectly symmetrical. Her left brow is angled at the tail end, while her right rounds out. Her bottom lip is much thicker on the left side than the right and also droops downward.
Her bruises are always depicted on the right because it’s easier to apply makeup on the same side as your dominant hand.
@YT also there is video on UA-cam of her coming out of the courthouse for the TRO. The bruise is infact on the right side of her face. So there is no mirroring. Plus as you said text but that could have been added after if a picture had indeed been mirrored
It's still very relevant because Amber Heard is treating the court and jury's judgement with utter contempt by repeating lies that have already been disproved in the case verdict. She should have an injunction at the very least put on her to prevent any further deformation. It's insulting to the Judge, jury and overall verdict. Keep up the good work BBB! 👏
Your exactly Right her testimony doesn't add up especially when Camille called her out on how many times she slipped up. And used her own words against her.. amber kept blaming everyone else for lying and won't take accountability for her own Lies...
My issue is how her hand motioned for "pulls his arm back with the phone" & her arm moves for "and throws it at my face". Hand looks more like it's about to make a fist. Arm moves like it's skipping a rock on the water. Who throws something, intending to do damage, sidearm instead of overhand like a baseball. It looked like she was playing Rock Paper Scissors. I guess overall it looked like she was throwing a punch, not a phone.
One way people say you can know you're dealing with a narcissist is if it feels like every interaction with them brings out the worst in you. And I think that's what happened to Johnny. He crossed a line, occasionally, but it was always in reaction to her over the top insulting behavior, and of course, physical threats. I think he admitted to head butting her, but that's when he couldn't dodge her blows anymore and tried to "bear hug" her to get her to stop it. He needs his career back and she needs to go off into obscurity.
I think it's called reactive abuse. The abuser will antagonize you until you explode. You will do & say things that aren't normal for you. This is great for the abuser bc they get to look like the victim (ala AH) & they get to say "SEE? I TOLD YOU THEY'RE CRAZY!". It's a double-whammy. Actually I think it might be a triple because as a person with empathy you'll feel bad about the things you said & did, so you will apologize to them & they get to forever use it against you.
Aren't they fun people? 🤯
@@AprilsJessesGirl you both hit the mail on the head. I don’t deny that he hit her, but it was in reaction to her antagonism and crazy making. My sister is an abusive narcissist and I saw her in Amber Heard. She’s on her second marriage with DV and has even lost her kids because of it. But she has this way of antagonizing and egging, with her words and body language that is so threatening that it activates your fight or flight. My sister once threw a glass of water in my face and I reacted by pulling back my fist to hit her. I was assaulted first! Then she shrank back like some victim and I realized what had happened, what happened in her marriages. It’s what happened with Johnny and Amber.
It is wrong to hit someone, even reactively. If Johnny never reacted, she wouldn’t have been able to twist things to make a domestic violence narrative. And I’m sure Amber isn’t 100%. There is an element of truth somewhere but we have no idea where it is and it’s definitely not what she’s trying to make everyone believe.
She takes no accountability for her actions, it’s always everyone else, and she is the one who has authority and should be believed. And it all has to do with maintaining this sense of superiority and specialness that they think they deserve.
It is so triggering for me.
@@hermitwatcher8997 I have been married for 33 years. About 15 years ago, during an argument, my husband said something so hurtful and untrue about me that I slapped him across the face. He instinctively slapped me too. First and last time either of us got physical. I remember it all very clearly, unlike AT who is deliberately vague about everything.
@@hermitwatcher8997 reactive abuse isn’t actually abuse though. I thoroughly researched it after seeing the therapist claiming they abused each other, based on Ambers claims only of course. I disagree that it’s wrong to hit reactively. Many instances of hitting reactively is in self defense and you damn well have every right to defend yourself, period.
I remember that too, but I believe he said it wasn't on purpose and that it happened accidentally while he tried to stop her. Didn't he even stand up in court and showed how it happened?
I remember that testimony and one of my thought was that one knows when the eye is impacted it’s not a question of maybe, this includes any part of the orbital socket. It’s very sensitive and damages to it don’t quickly disappear (I’ve had bruises in that area) yet the so called bruise in the photo was a small circle on the cheekbone NOT within the eye socket. I questioned the validity of that bruise as based on my experience and her story about where she claimed the alleged injury and the timeline of it was not matching her photo.
So mad I said exactly the same thing this morning on your Amber interview review that she had acted out the incident on the total wrong side am so glad that you’ve agreed with me 👍🏻🥰
I remember it bothering me during the trial and again during the video of her interview. Why would she point out the wrong side?! She seems right-handed, she described JD throwing movement with her right hand and her being hurt with her left hand... that plus the inability to produce tears while fake crying it's almost as if her body can't tell no lie! Except her mouth. People say she doesn't have one truthful bone in her body and I'm starting to disagree. Her body very much would like to escape the prison of her lies.
Highly informative being able to look over a barrister's shoulder. I remember one barrister from AU saying that they had many ways of reaching the truth in a case. Another time I was asked to forward transcripts between AU and USA. That trial lasted 21 days, slewed much money. Reading the texts was compelling to say the least. Never having seen either party, one had to "imagine" what the parties looked like.
Yes! I noticed that straight away, it was so very obvious. And, as you correctly say, subconsciously, we point to the injured area that we're describing 99 percent of the time. It's as though her continuity controller has missed the most obvious things, which is why I've always believed she was being untruthful. I tried so hard to believe her at first, but she made it too difficult to do so with her obvious lies. Thanks for continuing with these clips and observations. I don't think we'll ever see anything else more interesting for body language education any time soon. :)
I spent 7 weeks watching and rewatching this trial. It is important for both men and women. I recently listened to a podcast where they were talking about how careful people need to be because everyone on the podcast had been accused unfairly of abuse by a partner, coworker, or even family member. He said it was important to use your phone to record things so you had some proof. Pretty sad that this is what is still occurring in our society. Please continue to drop some nuggets of information.
As a DV survivor I thought she was lying about being hit around the head and face several times especially the ‘broken nose’ because there was never any pictures of blood in the whites of her eyes, even after the swelling went down and I could open my eyes again I still had bloodshot eyes for days if not weeks sometimes.
the thing that got me was she had NO MEDICAL EXAMINATION - there's no record of it, after this supposed incident, but she claims her NOSE WAS BROKEN..So who diagnosed that????
I badly injured my right knee 15 years ago. Had final corrective surgery 5 years ago. Injured my left knee not less than 8 months afterwards. I vividly remember both incidents and even though I have equally qualifying injuries to each knee I do not mix up the side I'm speaking of when I retell each injury.
The more she speaks the more she reveals the truth and lies. 💙
That gesture to the wrong eye stood out to me in the trial as well. I haven't heard anyone else mention it until now, so thank you for that. I love your videos, keep up the good work! ❤️
When she walked out of the court toward her car she was looking forward but then you could see her deliberately turn her face to the photographer so they can see the supposed bruise, if your a real victim you try to hide your face.
Yes!!! She was practically looking straight up to make sure it wasn't hidden 🙄 Uggghhhh !! Everyone with a brain can see she was setting him up... I'm so glad he won !!
Excellent point! There's a lot of shame involved in abuse.
My ex hurt my left arm when he tried to drag me from car. The veins on my hands bruised as I hung onto the steering wheel. That happened in 1997. Whenever I recall the story, I can still feel the pain and emotions. She pointed to the wrong side, plus it simply didn’t feel as if she was recalling a traumatic event.
@@BassHeartRiffs What a ridiculous thing to say, maybe you can't recreate the exact biological response from memory, but of course you can remember that something hurt and you were in pain and you don't want it to happen again. Combined with an event like this where someone you should be able to trust has turned on you, this isn't something you would forget. Reliving that experience in testimony and not even being able to touch the place where you were hit seems like a massive red flag to me.
@@BassHeartRiffs lol yes we can. It even causes anxiety because we can remember and we never want to feel it again.
@@BassHeartRiffs Ya we remember when we suffered pain.
Interesting. If anyone has ever watched any videos of Jackie Chan speaking about his injuries through the years, you will see him point to various parts of his body. It is done instinctively without hesitation. AH was stuttering when she was on the stand recounting what had happened to her. Her mind was going into overload because she couldn't keep up with all the lies.
Pre-requisite of a good liar is a brilliant memory! Sadly lacking here.
AND LOOKING UP SO MANY TIMES AS IF TO BE LOOKING FOR ANSWERS IN THE SKY DOES THE SKY LIE TOO AMBER LOL
I have just subscribed because it’s good to hear different perspectives from different legal standpoints! I like that you notice the finer details which (most likely), not all of us would. I really hope you’ll continue to discover and then share other findings you have , that are pertinent to A.H’s deceit! Thank you 🙏🏼👍💯👌🇨🇦
I've been waiting for someone else to point this out. I knew I wasn't the only one that caught it so Ty for posting!
When people start getting really vague about major, impactful incidents it's a clear sign of either lying or having been very intoxicated or somehow impaired when the incident took place.
It's pretty clear that she is an alcoholic and substance abuser.
This is something I picked up on at the time when watching her testimony and also that of all her witnesses (ex-friends) who mentioned her bruised cheek: they all gestured to their left cheek as they talked about it. I seem to remember only one of them was then asked which cheek it was (iirc Elizabeth Marz but they all blurred together at one point; though her whole testimony stood out as odd), idk if I'm misremembering, but I seem to recall a pause before she then then said it was the right cheek.
With the clip you showed of AH it's even more telling because she had just gestured with her right hand, so her hand was already in use but she then swapped it for the other. Idk about the other witnesses but she is right handed so it doesn't even make sense in context where they could have claimed she gestured with her dominant hand. It's a clear indication the injury wasn't real, but it's even more telling because it makes me wonder how they _all_ could make the same mistake with their action...the only explantation I can think of was they originally intended to do it on the left side (maybe even tried it but couldn't get lighting/angles for the photos they took... so the redid them by creating the red mark on the right) and then changed it for when they took the photos & went for the TRO. Also, someone needs to call her out on not being able to get the TRO privately, because lawyers who have worked in that court have said there are three private exits and they will ask which exit you want to leave by.
I could understand 1 or even 2 people indicating the wrong side, but when everyone who claimed to have seen the marks makes the same erroneous gesture, it sets off alarm bells.
As for self-correcting her wording, she realised that it would be picked up on because the bruise wasn't "in" the eye, so she changed it to "felt like", the same as she did when challenged about the broken nose, so it became "it felt like it was broken".
Noooo ..... now I gotta go back and re-watch testimony. lol. Ok I have an idea. Which of the pictures were taken with the front facing camera? Meaning that she took them herself - and they were reversed. So it was in fact on the left side of her face. I recall with the head-butt pictures, there was a framed letter in the background that we could read. But the phone-bruise pictures have most of the background cropped off.
And because AH & Rocky were relying on the photos for the TRO and it was a few days afterwards, they forgot. 😬
@@markusgorelli5278 I did wonder that myself at the time about her taking them herself, but then I'm fairly sure either Rocky or her ex said they took the pics.
THANK you for pointing out that Amber’s gesture while testifying was indicating that she was hit on the LEFT side of her face!! That jumped out at me while watching the trial & I wondered if the jurors or others noticed that, too!!
It sounds like a scripted scene, when someone who claims being assaulted, starts by describing the assaulting part's arm movement before, and then adds "with the phone". Too much information / observation is often a sign of lying.
You're the only one who has talked about this that I have seen...I had exactly the same thoughts when I saw this! Thanks for sharing!
Please keep giving us your expertise on this case. There's so much to unpack after a 6 week trial. And I think this case and its aftermath is important.
PROBABLY DEFINITELY DUE TO A POSSIBLE APPEAL YIKES
False allegations are important to talk about they absolutely destroy lives there needs to be punishment against dishonesty 👍
There's another phone lie.........she said he threw both phones out the window, she has no phone, and then in the same breath says she's texting him.
50 years ago as a teenager, I got hit by a piece of wood on the right side of my nose. I have never, ever referred to it as hitting (or felt like hitting) the other side. It's in my body's cellular memory, not my conscious memory. You don't forget where you were hit.