Endorsement Scenarios

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 чер 2024
  • Taking the information that we have discussed in prior videos, we can now use that knowledge to discuss specific scenarios that a pilot examiner may ask in a check ride. Please make sure to post any comments that you may have below so that I can work with you on answering any questions you may have.
    Standard Endorsements: www.amazon.com/clouddrive/sha...
    For a more complete guide to the CFI practical exam, try my book. It is filled with detailed information about FOI's, regulations, and endorsements. It is written from the examiner's perspective, as well as a veteran CFI and an active student.
    www.ToddShellnutt.com/shop
    Check out my Patreon channel for more great content!
    / toddshellnutt
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 46

  • @josiahwissmann6912
    @josiahwissmann6912 4 місяці тому +1

    I’m a SEL CFII that has been out of teaching for a while. I recently got my MEL and am currently working on my MEI. I was looking for something to help me get back up to speed on all the instructor endorsements and logbook entries. I came across your channel and it is phenomenal!!! Your content is really well done and has helped me tremendously!! Thank you!!

  • @MasterClassComments
    @MasterClassComments 2 роки тому +11

    Todd I was a CFI from 2015 to 17 and I'm working to get it reinstated now. These CFI and endorsement specific videos with the acronyms and FAR explanations are the best and most comprehensive tools I've used. I just loop the video over and over until I have every acronym down with explanations and the FAR that proves it PLEASE keep making more videos that do more scenarios about ALL the requirements AND endorsement s needed for someone wanting to add a category and also complex or off the wall endorsements/student scenarios!! Thanks!!

  • @Tyler-yb4mc
    @Tyler-yb4mc Рік тому

    Thank you!!

  • @peterhoover182
    @peterhoover182 4 роки тому +4

    great video. keep up the informative content!

  • @Tyler-yb4mc
    @Tyler-yb4mc Рік тому +1

    thank you

  • @CaptainSuarez
    @CaptainSuarez 4 роки тому +14

    Once again you are killing it Todd. Question, Have you ever considered conduct a seminar for the Wings Program? I would love other more people to watch you and receive wings credits. You are the best.

    • @ToddShellnuttCPC
      @ToddShellnuttCPC  4 роки тому +2

      I could do that! I am going to start some UA-cam live broadcasts this month, and I think I will add that one to the list. Thanks for being a loyal subscriber!!

  • @bulamoves2987
    @bulamoves2987 3 роки тому +2

    Mahalo nui Todd!

  • @petermegariotis1055
    @petermegariotis1055 3 роки тому +4

    I’ve watched all your regulation videos and love it. I learned a lot. I understand the Tim loves bacon. But what is the Tim loves bacon plus 1,2,3,1,2,32,33?

    • @patrickkotyuk205
      @patrickkotyuk205 3 роки тому +3

      1,2,3 61.93 1,2 3 (solo XC endorsements) 1,2,32,33 are the A. Numbers listed on AC 61-65H (needed for the practical test)

  • @martinl9137
    @martinl9137 2 роки тому +1

    Great content. Do you have any CFII Scenarios?

  • @bennemcek5856
    @bennemcek5856 Рік тому

    Hi Todd, I was wondering if you could answer my question?
    Is the A.8 endorsement a one time authorization OR does it allow for repeated flights? For example if I want to allow my students to make repeated solo cross country flights 20NM away do I have to provide A.11 or is A.8 sufficient? Thank you for the video!

  • @leoarjuncrasto
    @leoarjuncrasto 3 роки тому +2

    Wonderful and informative Tod!
    I had a question ...
    What is the difference between 61.31.d.2 where we give the Endorsement of A72 from Advisory Circular 61.65, for Sending a student solo on an aircraft for which they are not rated
    v.s
    The PIC training needed as per 61.129.b.4. where eg- Due to insurance purposes the Commercial Student with ASEL logs PIC time with the instructor on board demonstrating PIC capabilities on a Multi-engine.

    • @toddshellnutt540
      @toddshellnutt540 3 роки тому +3

      The difference is that one authorizes solo and the other one has an instructor in the airplane. So you would not give the 61.31.d.2 endorsement if there's gonna be another person in the airplane. That endorsement would only be used if the pilot would be solo in an aircraft that they were unrated to fly. Hope this helps.

    • @leoarjuncrasto
      @leoarjuncrasto 3 роки тому

      @@toddshellnutt540 thanks a ton Tod. ❤️

  • @phibra8845
    @phibra8845 Рік тому +2

    Quick question Todd: I am slightly confused about the necessity of endorsement A72. I understand that this is required in order to fulfil SOLO requirements, however is this endorsement also required for someone who will be conducting their checkride for an added rating? I ask because the Pilot who is conducting the checkride has to be the PIC on that day (not the DPE), therefore, am I correct to think that A 72 is ALWAYS required for an added rating when taking a checkride? Thank you for your invaluable help and stunning videos - I watched them all!!! :)

    • @ToddShellnuttCPC
      @ToddShellnuttCPC  Рік тому +1

      2 part reply.
      1 - See this letter of interpretation from the FAA regarding acting and logging PIC on checkrides: www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/agc/practice_areas/regulations/interpretations/Data/interps/2009/Murphy_2009_Legal_Interpretation.pdf
      2 - The A72 is only required for solo. Since the checkride is not that, it is not needed. See the above LOI.

    • @phibra8845
      @phibra8845 Рік тому +2

      @@ToddShellnuttCPC You are stunning Todd! I truly appreciate your effort and willingness to help and share your invaluable knowledge! Thank you!!

  • @Timothy_Texan
    @Timothy_Texan 4 місяці тому

    70 on written exam is absolutely not enough. I require my students to have at least 90 before even considering sending them to their checkrides

  • @tomerobligenarz4115
    @tomerobligenarz4115 4 роки тому +2

    not sure if I undurstood you at 16:55: the instructor need not be rated to act as PIC for a flight review? but then you said as long as its an airplane with no type rating? don't you need to be rated appropriately any time you are singing "instruction given"? if you could please clarify that, much appriciated, thanks!

    • @ToddShellnuttCPC
      @ToddShellnuttCPC  3 роки тому +1

      Sorry for the long time for your reply - what I said at that part was acting PIC in regards to the medical and additional endorsements. Meaning, you would only need to meet the requirements of 61.195(b) to give instruction if you are not acting as the PIC. So, any instance in which you are required to act at the PIC, you would have to meet ALL of the requirements to do so. However, you can give a flight review to a pilot of a King Air 90 as long as they can act as PIC for the duration of the flight.

  • @ltcterry2006
    @ltcterry2006 4 місяці тому

    Todd- love your videos. As a CFI involved in training new CFIs, I take lots of notes in my spiral bound FIH and PTS (great tip!). Nit pick question - Number 4 says "Required endorsement of a pilot logbook for the satisfactory completion of the required FAA flight review." Isn't that then about the *endorsement* rather than how to conduct a Flight Review. Or, isn't the DPE straying off the PTS if that becomes the question? (No doubt a new CFI needs to know how to do a FR.)

    • @ToddShellnuttCPC
      @ToddShellnuttCPC  4 місяці тому +1

      The intent is for the CFI to understand how to get to the endorsement. You can't give the endorsement without actually conducting the flight review. However, the PTS states that the DPE shall test to the greatest extent possible. That means everything is fair game.

  • @hansreeves8166
    @hansreeves8166 3 роки тому +2

    Can you elaborate on the scenario you give at 24:45? What would the differences be?

    • @ToddShellnuttCPC
      @ToddShellnuttCPC  3 роки тому +4

      Sorry for the delay in responding - the privileges only apply to the pilot certificate you are exercising. For instance, I hold an ATP Single and Multiengine pilot certificate, but when I am flying my own plane for pleasure, I am only exercising Private Pilot privileges. Does this help?

  • @evelynhsieh2830
    @evelynhsieh2830 3 роки тому +1

    Is it possible share the flight review book mention in the video?

    • @ToddShellnuttCPC
      @ToddShellnuttCPC  3 роки тому

      Here you go! www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_61-98D.pdf

  • @JuliusG73
    @JuliusG73 2 роки тому +1

    QQ: If time has lapsed for the pilot requiring a BFR, meaning over 24 calendar months since last checkride or BFR, can a CFI not acting as PIC (eg no medical, not type rated etc) conduct the flight review? I would've thought the answer was 'no' but please correct me if I'm wrong.

    • @ToddShellnuttCPC
      @ToddShellnuttCPC  2 роки тому +3

      You are correct. Someone has to act as PIC on the flight, and in this scenario, neither can.

  • @hegeltorina3347
    @hegeltorina3347 3 роки тому +1

    1) if a commercial MEL pilot wants to get a SEL, what does that person need to solo a SEL airplane during its training?

    • @ToddShellnuttCPC
      @ToddShellnuttCPC  3 роки тому

      If that person only holds a MEL and no SEL privileges, then they would only need the 61.31(d)(2) endorsement to solo the SEL airplane.

  • @aleclanfimsilva6503
    @aleclanfimsilva6503 4 місяці тому +1

    Hey Todd! Thank you for the video, I am just a bit confused about the “funky” scenario and would appreciate it if you can give some clarification or point me towards a FAR. What i do not understand is if someone that has a (tailwheel, high performance, high altitude, or complex) aircraft comes up to me and asks me to give them a flight review, who would be PIC? I am not properly endorsed, and they need a flight review so technically they cannot be PIC either? I know that if I am not acting as PIC I could still give instruction/flight review, but even for an aircraft that I am not properly endorsed to fly? I know examiners conduct practical test and do not log PIC time, but they are also properly rated and endorsed for the aircraft they are conducting the practical test in. Also, what if something were to go wrong with the aircrafts owner during the flight review and I am not properly endorsed in the aircraft. Obviously as a pilot I would take over the controls and land ASAP but still, it seems unsafe and like there’s a little hole somewhere. I appreciate any feedback, and thank you for reading!

    • @frankoropa8147
      @frankoropa8147 4 місяці тому

      Someone has to be the PIC in every flight. As neither of you can in this case, he will have to look for a different CFI with those endorsements or do the flight review in an airplane you can fly and act as the PIC.

    • @aleclanfimsilva6503
      @aleclanfimsilva6503 4 місяці тому

      @@frankoropa8147 Thank you sir!

    • @ToddShellnuttCPC
      @ToddShellnuttCPC  4 місяці тому

      I'm sorry for not getting back to you sooner. @frankoropa8147 got this one right in the comments. Someone has to be ACTING as PIC. Since the pilot is not able to do that, and the CFI is not able to do that, then the FR can not be accomplished. However, if the pilot came to you before their FR expired, then you could do it. Remember, just like you said, it may be legal, but that does not mean it's safe.

    • @aleclanfimsilva6503
      @aleclanfimsilva6503 3 місяці тому +1

      @@ToddShellnuttCPC Thank you Todd!

  • @SampleJoshua
    @SampleJoshua 4 роки тому +1

    Am I missing something? Bc I can not find the attached files

    • @ToddShellnuttCPC
      @ToddShellnuttCPC  4 роки тому +2

      File added to the comments section - Thanks for letting me know!

  • @colefrahm199
    @colefrahm199 4 роки тому +3

    If I do not have a high performance endorsement, could I not give instruction or an endorsement to a student seeking a high performance endorsement because no one would be PIC during the training flights?

    • @ToddShellnuttCPC
      @ToddShellnuttCPC  4 роки тому +2

      Cole Frahm correct. If you don’t have it, you can’t give it.

  • @noonelimits
    @noonelimits 2 роки тому

    a Tricky question about Examiner , could be what are the minimum hours if you have PPL H FAA and you want add CPL A FAA , with adding a Class , the hours before PIC A it is not declared, when he is proficient ok, but if he ask the exactly minimum hours before SOLO PIC A ? should I assume minimum 1 hour ? i think not, so what is the exactly answer please?

    • @ToddShellnuttCPC
      @ToddShellnuttCPC  2 роки тому

      There are no listed hours in the regulations that dictate how many hours a pilot must have before they conducte solo operations. It only states that the CFI must find them proficient. Hope this answers your questions.