22LR vs 17 HMR vs 22 MAG: Never Would’ve Guessed

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 тра 2024
  • This one will surprise you!!!!
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    ..
    .
    .
    .
    22lr vs 17hmr vs 22mag vs 5.7x28mm,22lr vs 17hmr,22lr vs 22mag,22lr vs 5.7,17hmr vs 22mag,17hmr vs 22lr,22mag vs 22lr,22mag vs 17hmr,22mag vs 5.7,5.7 vs 17hmr,22lr,22mag,17hmr,22wmr,whoteewho,who tee who,17hmr vs 22wmr,22 mag,22 mag vs,22 mag vs 22lr,22 wmr vs 22lr,22 wmr vs 22 mag,22 wmr vs 17 wsm,5.7 vs,5.7x28mm vs 22 mag,cmmg 5.7,5.7 cmmg,5.7 AR15,.22 wmr,22 magnum,rimfire comparison,rimfire vs stainless steel,whoteewho 22lr
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 686

  • @jameyayers9045
    @jameyayers9045 20 днів тому +102

    Always had a soft spot for thw 22 Mag. Can't shake it

    • @lynnkramer1211
      @lynnkramer1211 12 днів тому +2

      This has been a good demonstration for why we need to use the barrel length, the bullet weight and the bullet speed to calculate the foot lbs. of force from a cartridge.

    • @kpadalldotablet1009
      @kpadalldotablet1009 12 днів тому +2

      For the price, why not just go 5.56 military surplus ammo?

    • @Daltonleach11
      @Daltonleach11 7 днів тому +1

      Same. Especially with a hornady vmax

    • @bryantbutlermf
      @bryantbutlermf 2 дні тому

      Idk why I have the same feeling man, can relate 100%

  • @spartain39
    @spartain39 19 днів тому +46

    Awesome video! I myself am a 17HMR guy and have a good buddy who shoots 22mag and we find them very comparable in most real world applications.

    • @MrCobb-rq8iv
      @MrCobb-rq8iv 14 днів тому +2

      No they are not comparable, the 22 mag will never shoot with a 17 HMR

    • @perryparsons9960
      @perryparsons9960 11 днів тому +4

      ​@@MrCobb-rq8ivSure it will, just add a 5 mph cross wind. Both have their uses, when times got tight during the ammo shortage, could always find 17 HMR, have put a bunch through my Savage.

    • @mesutuzturk
      @mesutuzturk 8 днів тому

      Uytff

  • @Tonys_House
    @Tonys_House 19 днів тому +89

    Growing up in the hills of the Appalachian mountains, a 12 gauge and .22lr were the only two long guns needed. Oh, and did I mention that everywhere had those two for sale?
    To hillbillies everything else is just a "niche" round. 😆

    • @anthonyivy1305
      @anthonyivy1305 15 днів тому +16

      Yep, Country boys learn young that you can take a heck of a lot more food home with a little bullet placed properly than with a big bullet placed poorly.

    • @michaelm.7382
      @michaelm.7382 14 днів тому +9

      Hell yeah!! Appalachian and Allegheny Mountain raised!! Hunted with both ,a Marlin 22WMR bolt action,and a 12 gauge Remington 870. (Had a Marlin 36 30-30 in the gun rack) For what we hunted that's all the gun we ever needed

    • @kennethlocke4213
      @kennethlocke4213 13 днів тому +4

      I agree but now you get a combo gun. 30-60/12 gauge for deer/quail or the ultimate squirrel gun 22 mag/410 over unders. Yrs ago you could get a "drilling" but their not made anymore and stupid expensive. Side by side shotgun with a rifle between/top of the shotgun. Now. If you can find one? 10-15 thou $$ is on the cheap side.

    • @Tonys_House
      @Tonys_House 13 днів тому +2

      @kennethlocke4213 I had one of those 30 plus years ago. Didn't know what I had then 😞 .22lr on top .410 on bottom. Can't remember who it was made by as I got it in a trade for a 70s Buick Centurion. $45, a.22lr, and the over under. That was just before I left for the Army in 85. Not sure where it is now.
      Nostalgia took over and bought me a Pardner .410 3inch last year. I bought a 9mm sleeve for it due to hard to find slugs and my grandson (14) loves shooting it 🙂. Not to much longer it'll be his 😊. Hope he hangs on to it better than me.

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 12 днів тому +2

      @@kennethlocke4213 do you remember who mfg the 22/410?

  • @thomasking4136
    @thomasking4136 19 днів тому +64

    Truly a really fun video. 22 mag for shorter distances. 17 for longer. Bit flatter trajectory.

    • @johnhickman7926
      @johnhickman7926 16 днів тому +8

      I know when I was a kid I seen my dad shoot a red fox at about 100 yards with a 22 magnum and it took its lower jaw off and I know this because I seen it first hand, i have never shot a 17 hmr so i will not knock that round at all.

    • @PaulAtreidesMuadDib
      @PaulAtreidesMuadDib 8 днів тому

      I'd agree. However if I was in the field and I'd only be carrying one it'd be the .17 HMR due to that flatter trejectory and ability to reach further out and touch the varmits. The only downside IMHO is if you've got a bit of wind the mass of the 22 mag would have less drift. The compromise would be to have one with swapable barrels, however that would not be ideal to do in the field.

    • @mikehartman5326
      @mikehartman5326 4 дні тому

      Exactly spot on.

    • @donne9768
      @donne9768 День тому +1

      @@PaulAtreidesMuadDib Agree 100%. The .17 will be affected more by crosswind.

  • @lylewollenhaupt7424
    @lylewollenhaupt7424 20 днів тому +107

    Just for bullet weight and speed combo, ill take 22 mag all day long. Nice vid.

    • @seanfoltz7645
      @seanfoltz7645 15 днів тому +1

      It started with the Automag II for me and now I'm using the PMR 30 for my EDC.

    • @MrCobb-rq8iv
      @MrCobb-rq8iv 14 днів тому +2

      Got em both, hate the mag, 17 HMR all day long, or night.

    • @lylewollenhaupt7424
      @lylewollenhaupt7424 13 днів тому +5

      @@MrCobb-rq8iv your choice, mag doesnt break up as much, speed and bullet weight combo always wins for my needs. enjoy

    • @seanfoltz7645
      @seanfoltz7645 13 днів тому +1

      @@MrCobb-rq8iv Haven't had a chance to play with 17 HMR yet so can't say - what's wrong with WMR that you HATE it versus simply preferring HMR?

    • @drefhill
      @drefhill 13 днів тому +7

      but if you hit a rabbit or pigeon they'll be smashed.

  • @duanehamilton3247
    @duanehamilton3247 16 днів тому +65

    The 22 mag was at a slight disadvantage because it was just above the plate support which would cause a little more flex and absorb some of the shock. I believe if the shot were as low as the first two the mag would have made it through the fifth plate.

    • @janbotha6882
      @janbotha6882 14 днів тому +9

      I agree if the shot placement of the 22mag was lower it would have gone through 5

    • @glennrishton5679
      @glennrishton5679 14 днів тому +5

      Should have simply inverted the plates before shooting the 22 Mag.

    • @MrCobb-rq8iv
      @MrCobb-rq8iv 14 днів тому +2

      @@glennrishton5679 Or new plates, nothing about this test was correct, pure BS.

    • @larryjohnson6948
      @larryjohnson6948 13 днів тому +2

      I think that the 17 did the best. It basically matched the result of the 22 mag at half the weight. I do see the point of the place even with that. Half the weight.

    • @KevinHallen
      @KevinHallen День тому

      I agree. The flex in the center of the plates ate up more of the punch.

  • @randyblackburn9765
    @randyblackburn9765 19 днів тому +55

    I think that the 22 mag was compromised by hitting center of plate . Center of plate has more flex give . I think that if you shot the 22mag again near the side of plate it would go thru one more plate

    • @mikemchugh949
      @mikemchugh949 11 днів тому +6

      I was thinking the same. But I just like the 22 mag alot more. Great rimfire cartridge

    • @paulpetty3331
      @paulpetty3331 11 днів тому +1

      Looks like a lot of people have their own opinion 's,no one has made another video to prove or disprove what was illustrated...... show me

    • @randyblackburn9765
      @randyblackburn9765 11 днів тому +1

      @@paulpetty3331 maybe who tee who will show us

    • @neilmoreland5476
      @neilmoreland5476 4 дні тому

      Hello fellow Patriots,,,I'm 68 and grew up on a 100 acre Angus farm,,hunting and shooting a lot with my 22 lr..and many others since..
      Anyway what I'd like to have seen included here is the 17 cal WSM,,(Winchester Super Magnum).. Has little more power than 17 cal HMR.. I have both though.. I prefer the 17 cal WSM and own 3 Savage model B-Mag rifles to accommodate this round.. Both these 17 cals are the most accurate rifles I've ever shot..Don't get me wrong,,love my 22 lr and magnums too,,,but just not as accurate as the 17.. Example being when I was setting my BSA,Sweet 17 scope on my Savage B-Mag,,WSM, firing 3 round groups,,at 40 yards,,all 3 rounds went through the same hole,,,thought I'd miss two shoots on a 2x2 foot target,,Nope,,all in same hole...on a bench rest..I was amazed!!!!
      Also I'd love to see some gun manufacturer bring back the 32 cal rf,,short and long,,and develope a 32 rf long rifle and Magnum gun and ammo.. Will be requesting Henry and Savage to do so with the 32 cal rf.. The short and longs would work with the old time 32 rimfires.. I'm sure there's a market for it and I'd love to see results of a 32 rf long rifle and Magnum with a lot more guts.. I own one older Stevens,,32 rf short and long. 32 rf ammo isn't made by anyone currently to my knowledge...But should be... Any thoughts out there???

    • @randyblackburn9765
      @randyblackburn9765 4 дні тому

      @@neilmoreland5476 probably a neat idea , but as of now 32h&r mag is very hard to find and favor seems to be falling from 327 as I type . In my opinion 327 is a very practical round as interchangeable with 32 long and 32h&r mag.Also 32 calibre bullets are renowned for accuracy. I don’t know what’s going on with ammo manufacturing but many calibers seem to be non existent.I always wanted to see an N Frame 8 shot in 22 hornet

  • @pjm329
    @pjm329 16 днів тому +16

    Penetration was very close. But the way the .17 broke up would cause much more damage to tissue.

    • @jamesnorman8489
      @jamesnorman8489 10 днів тому

      More little bits to pick out of your meat.

  • @TheSirRip
    @TheSirRip 11 днів тому +6

    Most excellent comparison demonstration. All three rounds have definitive uses. .22lr = targets 25# or less @ 100m. 22mag = targets 100# or less @ 100m. .17mag = targets 75# or less @ 200m.
    Just a basic rule of thumb...

  • @larrywolfe9786
    @larrywolfe9786 19 днів тому +17

    Hi Larry here I have them both, my personal belief is that little 17 HMR is a wicked round, have used it a lot, KEEP UP THE GOOD VIDEOS I LOVE WATCHING THEM

  • @garyshrum2076
    @garyshrum2076 20 днів тому +39

    Great video. The next time I would like to see the 17 HMR switched out to the 17 WSM. Thanks again.

    • @UserFormelyKnownAs_hjkh
      @UserFormelyKnownAs_hjkh 19 днів тому +2

      Love my 17 WSM. Nasty little round

    • @patrickgriffitt6551
      @patrickgriffitt6551 18 днів тому +2

      ​@@UserFormelyKnownAs_hjkhisn't that a centerfire cartridge? I'm not familiar with it.

    • @UserFormelyKnownAs_hjkh
      @UserFormelyKnownAs_hjkh 18 днів тому +5

      @@patrickgriffitt6551 its a rimfire cartridge adapted from a .27 cal nail gun cartridge using 15, 20 or 25 gr .17 projectiles. It is currently the fastest rimfire in the world and the trajectory is absolutely amazing on it!

    • @Nenette.Rintintin
      @Nenette.Rintintin 14 днів тому +1

      Yes me too…. ! ✨🇫🇷✨🫡

    • @stroys7061
      @stroys7061 14 днів тому

      @@UserFormelyKnownAs_hjkh
      Love to see a video featuring the ballistics of that round.

  • @mbnz0174
    @mbnz0174 13 днів тому +10

    .22LR subsonic is my all time favourite. Not as deadly as the others, but still deadly on small game and almost silent when suppressed. For everything else, there is centrefire.

  • @daveyjoweaver6282
    @daveyjoweaver6282 18 днів тому +15

    I often wondered which was more powerful so now we have a pretty good idea, Thanks to you! And stainless is very tough! Ruining a few drill bits in my day drilling the stuff. Of course I wouldn’t want to be on the receiving end of any of those rounds! Kind Thanks and Many Blessings! DaveyJO in Pennsylvania

  • @maximpestsolutions3696
    @maximpestsolutions3696 20 днів тому +17

    Excellent Comparison of the 3 Calibers Adam 👍. Thanks for the Video 👌. Cheers 🍻🙏🍁.

  • @gerryhildebrandt2940
    @gerryhildebrandt2940 17 днів тому +6

    Great fun, I also have a 17, an LR and my new Savage 22 mag. They are all so much fun at the range, loved to to see the underestimated power of these three rounds going through Stainless.Enjoying the videos from British Columbia Canada

  • @IWatchedWhat
    @IWatchedWhat 20 днів тому +25

    I still like the 17 HMR because it has an edge on accuracy over the 22 Mag. For another test try the 20gr FMJ in the 17 HMR vs the 40 FMJ in the 22 Mag and lets see how they compare
    .

    • @A-a-ron480
      @A-a-ron480 17 днів тому +3

      I would love to see same caliber different boo-lots, same plates. Just to see!!

    • @irishkelly654
      @irishkelly654 17 днів тому +4

      Agreed.

    • @MrCobb-rq8iv
      @MrCobb-rq8iv 13 днів тому +3

      They don't or ever won't compare, this XXXX tried to skew the test by shooting a hollow-point 17 against a FMJ, nice try but I call BullWinkle.

    • @iffykidmn8170
      @iffykidmn8170 11 днів тому

      @@MrCobb-rq8iv 17 and 22mag were both JHP.

  • @jameyayers9045
    @jameyayers9045 20 днів тому +21

    Dude, you are mine and my boys favorite bull lots feller😂 Got 2 boys and we always put your videos in our top 5 and enjoy. Congrats on having a crap ton of subscribers and staying real brother.

    • @WHOTEEWHO
      @WHOTEEWHO  20 днів тому +6

      Thanks for watching!

  • @CarnivoreRonin
    @CarnivoreRonin 19 днів тому +2

    Great video! I'm loving this test rig and comparisons.

  • @dbmail545
    @dbmail545 20 днів тому +6

    I sold off my Ruger 77/17 years ago but was impressed with the damage that 17HMR did at the level of noise that it produced.

  • @joemisak7925
    @joemisak7925 20 днів тому +12

    Maxi-Mag hp+V 22 WMR 30 Grain are awesome performers in 22 mag , that’s all I use

    • @jamesscarberry3128
      @jamesscarberry3128 13 днів тому +2

      I’m with you my friend 👍 that’s my #1 coyote round out to 150 yards.🤠

    • @kimmichaels899
      @kimmichaels899 7 днів тому

      Don't forget hornady 45 gr critical defense, goes into 8" ballistic gel!!

  • @miker9043
    @miker9043 20 днів тому +17

    Rim fire fan here WhoTee so i enjoyed this one a lot ! I love the MacGyver metal sheet stand !!! All three rounds pack a lot more punch than most folks realize !

  • @bestestusername
    @bestestusername 20 днів тому +6

    everybody loves a "how many does it go through" video of any calibre!

  • @shawnbelford3433
    @shawnbelford3433 20 днів тому +5

    I guessed the 17 hmr which is one of my favorites. Would like to see a 17 mach2 which is awesome. Great video, thanks for showing us!!

  • @carl_h
    @carl_h 20 днів тому +70

    "Picked the wrong day to stop sniffing glue" Airplane movie

    • @billrowan1957
      @billrowan1957 20 днів тому +6

      Surely you can't be serious...

    • @oncall21
      @oncall21 19 днів тому +6

      @@billrowan1957Johnny how about some more coffee? No thanks!

    • @lightningscott5624
      @lightningscott5624 19 днів тому +8

      @@billrowan1957 He is. And stop calling him Shirley!

    • @jimchambers7548
      @jimchambers7548 18 днів тому +8

      Glad to see I'm not the only old guy watching 😂😂

    • @oncall21
      @oncall21 18 днів тому +3

      @@jimchambers7548 🤣👍

  • @kfelix2934
    @kfelix2934 14 днів тому +4

    22mag here. I missed the 50grain game shock These were great on sml hog, coyotes, and NA River Otters. Hard to find. these but they do travel slower but the penetration is great.

  • @michaela5311
    @michaela5311 14 днів тому +4

    Interesting test. I like the .22 Mag myself. New sub here from Australia

  • @dang6832
    @dang6832 18 днів тому +6

    That .17 has some “boogie”.
    I’d love to see PCC’s or Henry’s shooting pistol rounds and the same test. 9mm, 45ACP, 38 spl, .357 mag, .44 spl, .44 mag, …….whatever you can “round” up. Some of us would love to get a rifle with the same ammo as a pistol. Maybe one rifle round at the end for comparison. Thanks WTW.

  • @sirvince7853
    @sirvince7853 5 днів тому +1

    I would say 22LR because you can get them anywhere. Great video.

  • @chasintheoutdoors
    @chasintheoutdoors 19 днів тому +1

    Fun to watch the battle of the rimfire!!

  • @Golgi-Gyges
    @Golgi-Gyges 13 днів тому +1

    Thanks for the content. You covered about everything except for the grade of stainless steel and the gauge.

  • @screaminrebar5862
    @screaminrebar5862 18 днів тому +3

    I love this! If you get the opportunity, could you do 17 hmr vs 17 wsm tests?

  • @kennethzullick6897
    @kennethzullick6897 12 днів тому +1

    Nice rig you set up. I like it.

  • @jonbiz6223
    @jonbiz6223 20 днів тому +2

    That was a good video! Thanks!

  • @Leadbadger557
    @Leadbadger557 20 днів тому +2

    Great video thanks👍

  • @frankwaynefrank4081
    @frankwaynefrank4081 18 днів тому +2

    great job! thank you.

  • @markbailey15
    @markbailey15 15 днів тому +3

    Loved my Remington 22mag semi auto. Dropped some fallow with it

  • @TargetSuite
    @TargetSuite 14 днів тому +1

    Great video, WTW! I luv, luv, luv the 22 Mag!

  • @michaelmurphy6869
    @michaelmurphy6869 17 днів тому +3

    Thanks Who for another great video! Love your down to earth tests! Just a suggestion if possible, why not try small caliber center fire rounds (e.g 17 Remington, 204 Ruger, 220 Swift all those rounds are pushing the 4000fps relm) and shoot from a 100 yards or less at that same target set up. That would cool to see the results and after do the clay tests to make some modern art. Thanks again brother looking forward to the next videos. Keep up the great work!! God bless ya!

  • @martyadams3915
    @martyadams3915 20 днів тому +34

    The .22 mag wins hands down. Not only did it give more damage at the final plate it also gave a larger hole from begining to end. The .22mag is a very under rated cartridge in times past would be the only caliber rifle a household would have due to its versatility. Small game, predators, deer and even used for a slaughter gun for livestock. If anything more was needed the household usually had a shotgun of some type.
    Another .22 cal. I would like to see you spend some time on is the .22 hornet. Many backwoodsmen here in my area loved this caliber as a go to for everything. Nowdays its kinda considered a novelty caliber but i still believe it hard to beat in the predator hunting game. Unbelievably Its also legal for deer in my home state.

    • @PassivePortfolios
      @PassivePortfolios 19 днів тому +2

      22 mag. is a very well designed cartridge. It put several small centerfire rounds out of the varmint business. such as the 25-20 and 32-20 because the ammo and rifles are cheaper but still get the job done at short ranges.

    • @10mikemike89
      @10mikemike89 18 днів тому +1

      Most people don't need or want .22 mag. Return on cost isn't good.

    • @michaelmurphy6869
      @michaelmurphy6869 17 днів тому +1

      The 22 hornet is an old cartridge, I think it dates back to the 1880's also it's a center fire so it would out perform just about any rimfire. For being an old round it's very expensive. I knew a rancher in Oregon who like it, he said is good flat shooting round up to 200 yards, used mainly for coyotes, small game and non-game varmints on his land. Always kept the rifle in his ranch truck.

    • @PassivePortfolios
      @PassivePortfolios 17 днів тому +3

      @@michaelmurphy6869 - that is the problem with the Hornet - cost and availability. That's why the 22 mag. put the small varmint centerfires out if business. Ammo and rifles are cheap, and it is good up to 150 yards for varmints which is plenty for most farmers, hunters, etc. Compare the cost of a 22 mag. rifle to a 22 Hornet, no contest.

    • @bobg3633
      @bobg3633 17 днів тому +2

      17 takes it. It was only 17grains and did the same as the mag lol. I bet the 20grain 17 will go threw 5 plates

  • @peterodriguez2508
    @peterodriguez2508 17 днів тому +3

    So entertaining!! Your the best!!

    • @WHOTEEWHO
      @WHOTEEWHO  16 днів тому +2

      Thanks for watching!

  • @johnhumphries4632
    @johnhumphries4632 20 днів тому +1

    Cool video, I was leaning toward the 17HMR.

  • @markej4801
    @markej4801 6 днів тому

    As always, a really fun video! Thanks.

  • @js7127
    @js7127 17 днів тому +2

    Still like your "How many water jugs" the best but the plates are really cool.

  • @Tricksofatrade
    @Tricksofatrade 20 днів тому +1

    Hey WTW ! This was a fun video for show ! Love the home made steal holder yep yep !

  • @Dmowery5036
    @Dmowery5036 19 днів тому +3

    I wasn’t gonna guess cause I had no clue! Lol. I have and hmr and a 17wsm. I like them both. Don’t have a 22 mag yet. Great video! 👍🏻👍🏻

  • @LeaverAction
    @LeaverAction 4 дні тому +1

    Even the lowly 22 short will kill. I set up a similar test to yours with white pine 2x4's (nominal) with .22 short, .22Long Rifle, and .22 mag out of a North American Arms revolver (short barrel) and the short protruded just out of the first board and the 22 LR and .22 Mag were about the same through 4 boards. A brain or heart shot with any of these and "game over". Thanks for the test !

  • @jarredburlington
    @jarredburlington 20 днів тому +9

    Lets go. Love me sum rimfire showdown

  • @scubasteve3032
    @scubasteve3032 20 днів тому +2

    .22 mag is my go to but all of my small game shots are under 100 yards. Anything past that I would definitely go with the .17. Great video!

  • @foghornleghorn4173
    @foghornleghorn4173 4 дні тому

    I’ve shot several groundhogs at 165 and 135 yards with my Savage 17 HMR with bull barrel. On the other hand I like my Savage 22 mag for fox and coyote at closer rages or when breezy conditions. Both are good tools for the right job. Thanks, I enjoyed your comparison!

  • @richardkellar9259
    @richardkellar9259 17 днів тому +2

    Still thinking you need to try 22TCM! I will continue to remind you about this under appreciated ammo!

  • @adamschlag5086
    @adamschlag5086 20 днів тому

    Would love to see more .22lr comparisons like Punch vs Stinger vs GB or something like that. Cool setup, I love me some 22!

  • @dwightgentz1302
    @dwightgentz1302 4 дні тому

    Nice comparisons

  • @tt600pch
    @tt600pch 19 днів тому +4

    The only real bummer with a 17 is a windy day. I have a buddy that gave me some shells to sight in the new 17 he bought. I shot and hit to the right, adjusted and hit right again. I shot the magazine full and kept adjusting. Then I grabbed my 17 and shot, it hit right as well. Then the wind blew made my paper target fold over and my inside voice said "DUH"... I then went from the open gravel pit to a little draw with some brush and no wind. Zeroed in with no problem. I don't know how fast the wind was but it changed impact 3" at 25 yards.

    • @JohnJohn-qc3gp
      @JohnJohn-qc3gp 19 днів тому +1

      out of these 3 the 17 HMR has the least wind drift though

    • @irishkelly654
      @irishkelly654 17 днів тому +2

      3" at 25 yards, LOL, come on, be real! Were you shooting during the peak of a hurricane? A 40 grain .22LR will shift around 6" at 100 yards with a 10MPH cross wind. 3" at 25 yards for a 17HMR, please, LOL...stop lying...

    • @gregharrison7631
      @gregharrison7631 11 днів тому +1

      ​@@irishkelly654yeah I thought the same thing, I have all three 17hmr, 22lr, as well as 22mag if he was getting a 3 in drift at 25 yards I would think the wind had to be blowing pretty hard and anybody with any experience with those three rounds would know thats not the time to sight in a rifle lol.

  • @reallythough4591
    @reallythough4591 4 дні тому

    Almost twice as fast, not over twice as fast. Love the vids, hooty hoo

  • @Primer595
    @Primer595 15 днів тому +2

    Nice video! I would like to see the 22Mag with a 50 grain bullet and a 17HMR with the 20 grain for comparison.

  • @lawrencemartin1113
    @lawrencemartin1113 3 дні тому

    I shoot a fair amount of .22LR out of either a Ruger 1022, or an M&P 1522. Love both. Great on small game and pests. But for range, accuracy and flat trajectory, you would be hard pressed to beat the .17HMR. I love my CZ and it has been an incredibly accurate and long reaching little rifle. I have never shot a .22WMR, so have no personal experience, but looking at your results, it seems clear it has excellent stopping power, but possibly at the cost of quite a drop off in trajectory at anything much over 75 to 100 yards. My .17 has been amazing out to 200 yards on occasion and my longest measured rabbit, was out at a ridiculous 275 yards one very still summer evening. A small hold over did the trick and the devastation from that wonderful little round was 'convincing'!
    Fun video here; thanks for the effort in making it.😊

  • @stevenkennedy4130
    @stevenkennedy4130 17 днів тому +1

    Thanks for the share!!

    • @WHOTEEWHO
      @WHOTEEWHO  17 днів тому +1

      Thanks for watching

  • @reapergrim76
    @reapergrim76 20 днів тому

    Love that stuff! 😊

  • @dr.froghopper6711
    @dr.froghopper6711 19 днів тому +15

    I bought the 22 magnum and never looked back

  • @nativepride187
    @nativepride187 19 днів тому

    Very interesting video who tee who thank you sir

  • @Florida_man420
    @Florida_man420 2 дні тому

    Wow WTW you have a lot more subscribers than you did last time I saw. Congrats on the success

    • @WHOTEEWHO
      @WHOTEEWHO  2 дні тому

      Thanks for watching. I am working hard at it. New videos every day

  • @BAXTERKA.
    @BAXTERKA. 15 днів тому

    Ez szuper videó. 💯👍🏻 Köszönöm.🤝🏻

  • @budlite8207
    @budlite8207 20 днів тому +2

    Not surprised by the outcome. Next time maybe try a 30 or 32gr bullet in 22 mag and and a 25 gr in 17. Closer weights. Good video Mr., thank you.

  • @garychaiken808
    @garychaiken808 13 днів тому

    Great job. Thank you 😊

    • @WHOTEEWHO
      @WHOTEEWHO  13 днів тому +1

      Thanks for watching

  • @hds181
    @hds181 7 днів тому

    Another good video. Thanks!

  • @billybud9557
    @billybud9557 12 днів тому

    Fun test............well organized. Thanks. Wonder how the 5.7 pistol would have done?

  • @thomasschmoldt6883
    @thomasschmoldt6883 11 днів тому

    Neat video with results as expected. Wondering if different loads would be the same?

  • @chucksshavingchannel3101
    @chucksshavingchannel3101 19 днів тому +1

    Nice video. Id wish more pistol manufacturers would make a 17hmr auto pistol

  • @leroymorris6036
    @leroymorris6036 16 днів тому

    Thanks for the scientific explanation of bullet performance...

  • @michaelltnv6741
    @michaelltnv6741 20 днів тому +7

    The live chat disappeared. Thank you for this video. I want a 17 or A 22 mag, so this will help me. I appreciate it.

    • @WHOTEEWHO
      @WHOTEEWHO  20 днів тому +2

      Thanks for watching

  • @charlesmorgan1879
    @charlesmorgan1879 20 днів тому

    Nice work !

  • @stevenkern6527
    @stevenkern6527 16 днів тому +1

    Good job thank you

  • @ronsorrentino6207
    @ronsorrentino6207 20 днів тому

    I’m a big fan of the li’l ole .17HMR. Only have 1 gun chambered in/for it though and it’s a Taurus revolver and it’s a 6” barrel and the model 617 I believe it is?
    But then I also like the .22 Win Mag. And who doesn’t like the .22LR?!
    Great video and demonstration Hoot.

  • @tommyd3784
    @tommyd3784 20 днів тому +3

    I have been wanting to get a rimfire for a while. I think you talked me into it!

    • @royjohnson465
      @royjohnson465 11 днів тому

      Before you get into rimfire, take a look at the latest modern pellet guns or known as air rifles out nowadays, close to as powerful as a rimfire 22 LR, cheaper to shoot and quiet, it is all that a person needs, with a scope.

  • @carlwilliams6300
    @carlwilliams6300 19 днів тому

    Great video buddy

  • @STEVESMITH-zx3ez
    @STEVESMITH-zx3ez 6 днів тому

    You just got a new subscriber hailing out of North Carolina brother 🎯

    • @WHOTEEWHO
      @WHOTEEWHO  6 днів тому

      Thanks for subscribing!

  • @BlackArcher221
    @BlackArcher221 19 днів тому

    Good Demo. Just bought a .17 this year and I’m not surprised at your results. That .17 is a zinger. .22 mag has the umph though.

  • @catfishsiegel30
    @catfishsiegel30 20 днів тому +6

    The .17 hmr is my varmit cal . I use all 3 calibers a lot 😊

  • @forrestebert5276
    @forrestebert5276 19 днів тому

    Good video. Maybe next time you could test them out with the ballistic gel? STS is ok but the gel will give you real time performance per say.

  • @Thousand_yard_King
    @Thousand_yard_King 18 днів тому +1

    I'd like to see these compared to 17. WSM..
    From what I've seen, it blows the other three away. No pun intended😅

  • @Jo-tw8kr
    @Jo-tw8kr 18 днів тому +10

    I'll stick with the 17HMR with a 20g fmj. Great video!

    • @alainvoyer8104
      @alainvoyer8104 14 днів тому +1

      Yeah, and not Hollow point 17 hmr like 2 other 22 cal

  • @roberthennesey5166
    @roberthennesey5166 19 днів тому +1

    great video!

  • @JeRKII
    @JeRKII 19 днів тому +1

    I was falling a sleep the first and second times watching this ( not video's fault ).
    I had the same thoughts as some of the other commenters.
    After I woke up I went back and rewatched a third time ( hope in some way it help with the analytics ).
    Saw that both the 17 HMR and the 22 mag were JHP's I've always wondered about 22 mag.
    Awesome idea on this comparison was going to suggest FMJ's compared but if memory serves me correctly no one makes a 17 FMJ in fact the 1 shot here is the closest to that....

  • @eddiewest8477
    @eddiewest8477 14 днів тому +1

    By the way, joined ur channel because of this video, 👍 great video

    • @WHOTEEWHO
      @WHOTEEWHO  14 днів тому

      New videos every day! Appreciate you watching!

  • @martinkavanagh196
    @martinkavanagh196 6 днів тому

    Great test rig Mike .. they all 3 are handy as - but the .22 LR is most affordable eh.

  • @mjc4942
    @mjc4942 13 днів тому

    Cool test system. Pretty easy, and simple. Looks very reusable. Rotating and moving shot pieces to the back... You could use marker on the holes . Use good work gloves.

  • @imeprezime1285
    @imeprezime1285 20 днів тому +1

    Nice. Continue with these tests with pistol calibers. Metal sheets are more reliable than paper plates

  • @noahboat580
    @noahboat580 20 днів тому

    That 17 fmj fragmenting is so cool. Someday ill get a .22 that isnt single shot, almost bought a .22 long Bernadelli pistol, but ill find something similar in italian origin

    • @heathadams1274
      @heathadams1274 20 днів тому

      The 17 was a hollow point. I think if it was an FMJ it would have won. Same principle as the 243 and 25-06 piercing through steel easier than a 7mm or 30 cal.

  • @samueldanealexander180
    @samueldanealexander180 20 днів тому

    Great video, I think the chrono stopped working when the cloud cover went away. Mine doesn’t like full sun either.

  • @jerad4336
    @jerad4336 3 дні тому

    22 Hornet is a fun little cartridge as well.

  • @oncall21
    @oncall21 19 днів тому +2

    Great video Hootey. How far was the muzzle from the first plate? It would be interesting to see how the three performed at rimfire ranges at say 50 - 70 yards. Thanks for sharing.

  • @rubberduckie3484
    @rubberduckie3484 7 днів тому

    Just got a Brass Henry.... looking forward to playing soon...

  • @stanrich8396
    @stanrich8396 5 днів тому

    Good Vid. I am a .22 Mag and LR user.

  • @peteredondo8654
    @peteredondo8654 12 днів тому +1

    Velocity matters. Fragmentation can make wounds much worse if penetration depth is sufficient.

  • @pardralockett
    @pardralockett 17 днів тому

    Good video brother 👍

  • @nelsonm5032
    @nelsonm5032 15 днів тому +1

    basically the 17 and 22 mag have double the powder charge of the 22lr… and a .223 has double the powder again. i wonder if a 223/556 would of gone through them all…i’m thinking no problem, but…. haha. great video! cheers

  • @IndependentArmz
    @IndependentArmz 4 дні тому

    You should check out 22TMC. It's a 9mm necked down to 22. flies around 2800fps. It's a fun rifle. I believe it began as a pistol round though.

  • @ericb.4358
    @ericb.4358 15 днів тому +1

    Thanks for an interesting and informative video.
    The .22 magnum in 40 grain plastic nose hollow point is a very nasty rimfire cartridge from a carbine or rifle. It is much underrated.

  • @herbertz1o5
    @herbertz1o5 11 днів тому

    Compare 22wmr at different grain/muzzle velocities - provides a meaningful comparison of what speed does vs. weight

  • @jpvernoutside3378
    @jpvernoutside3378 2 дні тому

    I have been comparing 22mag and 17HMR for along time on multiple distances and targets.
    Kill power is about the same. I think it is speed vs power in making the bullet expand that equals out the kill power. Accuracy out to 100-110 yards is pretty much the same... after that the 17 continues on a flatter trajectory with speed.and the 22 mag keeps more energy.
    I have found that the 20gr 17HMR is a better round out of my Savage bolt action, heavy barrel.
    Thanks for the cool video. Always enjoy them.