@@haydentravis3348Those looked like demonstration engines only. You wouldn't want to try a maximum performance flight until characterization testing was completed.
Damn did you guys really basically build a missile from scratch by yourself? That is insane. It also looks really slick the flight looked very smooth. Very impressive. Can't imagine the amount of work that went into it.
@@corruptedmineral Hate to break it to you but, this takes place in china. You can see at the end of the video it even states NUAA. stands for "Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics" most of the development software was in Mandarin as well.
@@AssassinGT most places in china have absolutely banned drone flights of any kind. They're afraid of "the people". Imagine if chinese have access to 3d printers and a chemistry lab? Yea, they could launch a rocket attack on pretty much any CCP asset.
I haven't checked the legislation in 15 years but I do remember model rocketry getting a lot of scrutiny in regards to their onboard control systems. They were only allowed very rudimentary controls if you had anything like in this video the feds would have probably locked you up for domestic terrorism and manufacturing guided missiles. Be very careful when even considering making something similar, check your locals laws and such and never assume good faith from law enforcement. Those days are long gone.
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
If it was that simple "algebraic sum" :) It should use some PID, because relation between how wings are adjusted and how should be set. Depends on various factors like for example speed or size of wings. Greater the speed lower the feedback should be, but not always if it would be too loow - SpaceX lost fuel, could not adjust it's position fast enough and fliped over. To not cause too much correction than necessary causing in consequence loosing it's trajectory in opposite direction - making it even worse. Simple PID should be set, to set P and I and D module properly you have to test it couple times. One to react quickly over-reacting, other integrating change add some "trim" and third simply multiply by some factor I hope you know all of this, just wrote for everyone else - it's not that simple, although more or less, way you described. Perfect algorithm would "learn" during long flight could gather information and subsequently adjust PID parameters to end up with minimal deviation. It's difficult if you deal with rocket.. to learn i hope they continue for example set goal of hiting target like baloon or something in the air :) That would be cool. First baloon with GPS attatched and both connected. Second time only visual. Private defence system :)
The idea to stabilize the descent center of lift vs center of mass by jettisoning the bottom stabilizers is amazing, love your project. Its actually first non-sounding (actively stabilized) rocket i see on YT
wait, missiles have a center of lift? i tought they worked with high twr's ? and another question, what if they don't have one? or is it even possible?
@@WarDucc Anything has a center of lift. It's the point where all integral aerodynamic forces are located. You know, the wing surfaces generate lift and drag - which are nothing but two components of a force vector. These local force vectors can be integrated over the entire craft (as any surface will create some drag, therefor an aerodynamic force) and you will have a vector that has a direction and an origin, and said origin is called the center of lift. Since lift forces are usually orders of magnitude bigger than drag forces (at least for high angle of attack configurations) we call this principle "Center of lift". It plays a crucial role in vehicle stability. A stable system will always try to orient the center of lift behind the center of mass for a moving object. The feathers on an arrow demonstrate that principle very well. You put them on the end to keep the arrows flight path straight. A slight deviation from the straight orientation will increase the angle of attack on the feathers and force the arrow back into a straight flight path. This means a deviation is met with a counteracting force and self balances the object. "Straight as an arrow" comes to mind. If you put the center of mass behind the center of lift, the opposite happens: A small change in angle will, again, create a force on the guiding surfaces of the vehicle. This force, however, is now acting in such a way that itself increases the angle of attack even further. This results in a larger force, finally flipping the vehicle such that the center of lift now is behind the center of mass. The thing about aerodynamics is, that lift and drag are functions of the Reynolds number. Changing flight conditions will result in changing aerodynamic forces. You need to account for all states of flight to ensure your vehicle is stable thoughout. Especially the transsonic regime is acting up, as many properties of airfoils change dramatically in this environment. I somehow doubt that this was a consideration on this project though. To conclude: Jettisoning the lower fins simply removes their aerodynamic forces from the overall integral of all force vectors. If you remove a vector far away from the center, it will effect the resulting position of the center significantly. The rocket basically turns the direction of the arrow mid flight - from having "small feathers" up front and "big feathers" in the back to only having "small feathers" in the front, making it the new rear of the arrow as it inverted.
@@WarDucc well, rockets have a center of lift and they are essentially oversized missiles. For missiles, center of lift isn't about generating enough lift to take flight, it's about keeping the missile stable during flight. If the center of lift is ahead of the center of mass in the direction the missile is moving, then the missile will attempt to invert itself, since the center of lift always tries to stay behind the center of mass for stability. To counteract that, missiles have fins on the rear that push the center of lift behind. However, when the missile is vertically falling and the parachute is installed on the nose, then the original design is very unideal, as the missile will now try to fall nose first to maintain stability. To counteract this, we need to push the center of lift further up the missile. The team here achieved this by jettisoning the fins, which pushes the center of lift further up so that the missile can fall thruster down.
@@DreamInProgess Are you saying to raise and lower them? that would require some sort of actuator or spring based mechanism to move them, the reaction forces would probably be weird too. ejection is probably the least complex mechanism to remove the fins and make it so the rocket naturally wants to point down after it hits the highest point in its travel.
@@evanweir169 fins causes more drag at the back of the center of the mass thus would make the rocket wanna point towards the ground on the descend so they couldn't use the parachute effectively . Wires on fins could still cause the same effect as fins would float up relative to the rocket on the descend and would still be pulling the bottom of the vechile and force it to point downwards .
Yep you are right, there is always a percentage of people who are interested in different things, and the harder things are there will be less people interested in, or specializing in. There is nothing easy to watch TikTok all day, and the hard things, for example learning how to make missiles, drones, planes cars....@@ege8240
With control engineering background, I don't think it looks hard. A simple pid controller should work. The hardest part comes wih trajectory control which in turn boils down to navigation part.
We used to play with rockets 35 years ago. But with what is available now, you have a world of exploration extra. Nice job ! Keep up the fun for the rest of your lifes.
Just when I thought I was an "engineer"; all those young man are TRUE engineers. Probably in a thousand years I will be able to scratch 2% of what they already know... Such a charming thought, isn't it?
@@evanweir169 one good mechanism is supporting students to carry out projects. In Egypt, such a project would be banned on the basis of national security. (it is a 7 year jail for using a drone)
@@kioly_ah If you come from a free country, you could not imagine. Military dictatorship is a horrible thing. China is lucky in comparison. Also, they went from dark to light! So what we see now should be considered incredible leaps forward. Also that they will continue in that direction.
Tam beklediğim performans. Çok güzel çalışma olmuş. Zekice düşünülmüş bir sistem. Roketin kalkış esnasında yalpalanma olmaması için eksenini düzelten bir kanat sistemi (gyroskop ile ) yapılmış. Cidden çok havalı ve güzel. Tebrik ederim.
After watching this video thoroughly on multiple occasions. I can confirm without any doubt that the missile knows where it is at all times. (It knows this because it knows where it isn't.)
I have been wondering, how important is it to place an IMU at the exact center of mass? It looks like most systems keep the chips very close to this center, but a few millimeters off of the center doesn’t affect accuracy in any negative way. Beautiful work on this guidance system!
If your IMU is mounted with separation from your COM, then it will detect spurious linear accelerations when the vehicle experiences any sort of angular rate or angular acceleration. Provided that this is characterised beforehand and filtered out of the IMU output, there should be no issues.
in the center pc is for gyroscopes or needs use more than bigger mass more devices more issues Russians use hydraulic or pneumatic people already found lot of pneumatic cylinders from control systems like missile have a gas tank for 200 -300 movements electric can give big angles but is low on power and if long fly need big power supply, some of them missiles have gas collecting tubes like ak 47 power get from gas exhaust and who have seen big missiles have whole space engine in missiles with liquid fuel turbine like from the car and very poison fuel -and police don't like these toys if 6kilos toy can demolish tank -is not Soo toy to be played -russian like to show s500 but speed climb trajectory change it probably is empty same is them nukes by size and weight why make AAmisilles like nukes? carriers don't fly and size of hellfire is more than enough
@@bb-bricks3040 I think you are correct. I don't understand why they want the rocket traveling straight down. It sure seems like it would be hard to find those fins again. There's probably a good reason for doing it this way, I just don't understand it.
@@ddegn if you can see those fins on the back help control the rocket and the top (or front) part is chamfered for aerodynamics. Because of their 90 degree trapezoidal design as well as the positioning (you don't want control fins on the front of your rocket), they would negatively affect its aerodynamics.
@@bb-bricks3040 I can see how ejecting the fins improve aerodynamics, I just think it's an interesting choice to discard the fins. I wonder if the fins are considered disposable. It sure seems like it would be hard to find the fins after each launch. Of course with 3D printing those fins could be replace with very little effort and very little cost. My wondering about the fins shouldn't be taken as criticism of the rocket design. I think the rocket is amazing.
Because I want the Rocket to maintain the upward attitude in order to control the trajectory of the decline process, and I will try to use a reverse engine to land in the future.
L Shang you have superb, knowledge and talent in all things rockets and drones. Very impressive rocket that was 3 D Printed and all the Rocket Guidance that you put together .
I like how you guys can build this stuff. In Poland they would hunt down such engineer and prosecute him until he would "shit himself". Great work with sensor fusion algorithm.
@@noahw4623t is actually perfectly legal to design and build guided rockets in America. We have the 2nd amendment, after all. If they have explosives attached, then it is a little more complicated but still possible. Testing them can become a lot more complicated as there are FAA (surprisingly not ATF) regulations that prevent guided rocket testing without special permission. Guided meaning that it lands in a specific location. It’s a lot easier to design, test and deploy autonomous loitering munitions that do not use rocket motors, like the switchblade drones and the like, these days if you are a budding Tony Stark.
In fact, they come from Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics. This university is one of China's seven most renowned military engineering universities and was among the first to be sanctioned by the United States. These young students will undoubtedly go on to work on real missiles in the future.
How can you just walk around with it at the park without making rocket noises and pretending it is flying???? That was some impressive self control, I would definitely be like "FSHHHHHHHHHHHHHFSHHHHFSHHHH!!!" every time I carried it around. Amazing project I am really impressed! Also if you do ever need someone to follow the rocket around wherever it goes making rocket noises, I am your man.
Everything looks so well made! Awesome work! how long did it take from start to good launch? Did you use any open-source software? In particular for flight control or cad designs?
Chinese kids having more advanced guidance tech than russian military missiles is pretty funny. Edit: called them korean when they're chinese, bit of an oops.
Hey Wulfleyn, appreciate your sense of humor! Just to clarify, the kids in the video are actually from China, not Korea. While their technology might not be on par with military-grade missiles, it's still fascinating to see how far technology has come and how it's accessible to people of all ages. Cheers! 😊
i mean id like that too but tbh i feel like such systems most likely fall under multiple countries regulations of weapon systems just like passive radar code and so son with the kraken SDR not sure if Japan has such regulations not to mention the huge amount of risk this would add for terror attacks and other things like assassinations which in japan are pretty on topic rn so i think the release of the code would be more unlikely, although this may be sweet to send the FSB a present from some activists in Russia this would be hecking sick for causing chaos inland russia
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't, by subtracting where it is, from where it isn't, or where it isn't, from where it is, whichever is greater, it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance sub-system uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is, to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position where it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event of the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has required a variation. The variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too, may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computance scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is, however it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subracts where it should be, from where it wasn't, or vice versa. By differentiating this from the algebraic sum og where it shouldn't be, and where it was. It is able to obtain a deviation, and a variation, which is called "air"
Did a laser guided model rocket back in the 80's with nowhere near the tech used here. Photodiodes and 741 op amps for the most part. Tube launched and two staged. Could hit within 4 feet of the aim point at 500 yards.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Wildly cool, great work!!
i remember you seeing this
Big fan sir ❤
Your just going to let em show you up like that?
Can't believe BPS space is actually commenting in here
Roses are red, violets are blue... 😂
Everybody gangsta until he inserts a payload inside it
Were the engines full throttle?
@@haydentravis3348Those looked like demonstration engines only. You wouldn't want to try a maximum performance flight until characterization testing was completed.
it will suddenly know where it is. because ultimately, it knows where it isnt.
@@josephastier7421 With standard untouched 3d printed parts you wouldn't want to try a maximum performance flight at all lol.
I wish they made the software open source that's all.
Damn did you guys really basically build a missile from scratch by yourself? That is insane. It also looks really slick the flight looked very smooth. Very impressive. Can't imagine the amount of work that went into it.
American DIY content be like
@@corruptedmineral 'murica!
@@corruptedmineral Hate to break it to you but, this takes place in china. You can see at the end of the video it even states NUAA. stands for "Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics" most of the development software was in Mandarin as well.
@@AssassinGT most places in china have absolutely banned drone flights of any kind. They're afraid of "the people". Imagine if chinese have access to 3d printers and a chemistry lab? Yea, they could launch a rocket attack on pretty much any CCP asset.
I haven't checked the legislation in 15 years but I do remember model rocketry getting a lot of scrutiny in regards to their onboard control systems. They were only allowed very rudimentary controls if you had anything like in this video the feds would have probably locked you up for domestic terrorism and manufacturing guided missiles. Be very careful when even considering making something similar, check your locals laws and such and never assume good faith from law enforcement. Those days are long gone.
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
If it was that simple "algebraic sum" :) It should use some PID, because relation between how wings are adjusted and how should be set. Depends on various factors like for example speed or size of wings. Greater the speed lower the feedback should be, but not always if it would be too loow - SpaceX lost fuel, could not adjust it's position fast enough and fliped over. To not cause too much correction than necessary causing in consequence loosing it's trajectory in opposite direction - making it even worse. Simple PID should be set, to set P and I and D module properly you have to test it couple times. One to react quickly over-reacting, other integrating change add some "trim" and third simply multiply by some factor
I hope you know all of this, just wrote for everyone else - it's not that simple, although more or less, way you described. Perfect algorithm would "learn" during long flight could gather information and subsequently adjust PID parameters to end up with minimal deviation. It's difficult if you deal with rocket.. to learn i hope they continue for example set goal of hiting target like baloon or something in the air :) That would be cool. First baloon with GPS attatched and both connected. Second time only visual. Private defence system :)
Beat me here.
I knew I'll see this comment
You win the internet
Classic
The idea to stabilize the descent center of lift vs center of mass by jettisoning the bottom stabilizers is amazing, love your project. Its actually first non-sounding (actively stabilized) rocket i see on YT
Joe Bernard
wait, missiles have a center of lift? i tought they worked with high twr's ?
and another question, what if they don't have one? or is it even possible?
@@WarDucc Anything has a center of lift. It's the point where all integral aerodynamic forces are located. You know, the wing surfaces generate lift and drag - which are nothing but two components of a force vector. These local force vectors can be integrated over the entire craft (as any surface will create some drag, therefor an aerodynamic force) and you will have a vector that has a direction and an origin, and said origin is called the center of lift.
Since lift forces are usually orders of magnitude bigger than drag forces (at least for high angle of attack configurations) we call this principle "Center of lift". It plays a crucial role in vehicle stability. A stable system will always try to orient the center of lift behind the center of mass for a moving object. The feathers on an arrow demonstrate that principle very well. You put them on the end to keep the arrows flight path straight. A slight deviation from the straight orientation will increase the angle of attack on the feathers and force the arrow back into a straight flight path. This means a deviation is met with a counteracting force and self balances the object. "Straight as an arrow" comes to mind.
If you put the center of mass behind the center of lift, the opposite happens: A small change in angle will, again, create a force on the guiding surfaces of the vehicle. This force, however, is now acting in such a way that itself increases the angle of attack even further. This results in a larger force, finally flipping the vehicle such that the center of lift now is behind the center of mass.
The thing about aerodynamics is, that lift and drag are functions of the Reynolds number. Changing flight conditions will result in changing aerodynamic forces. You need to account for all states of flight to ensure your vehicle is stable thoughout. Especially the transsonic regime is acting up, as many properties of airfoils change dramatically in this environment. I somehow doubt that this was a consideration on this project though.
To conclude: Jettisoning the lower fins simply removes their aerodynamic forces from the overall integral of all force vectors. If you remove a vector far away from the center, it will effect the resulting position of the center significantly. The rocket basically turns the direction of the arrow mid flight - from having "small feathers" up front and "big feathers" in the back to only having "small feathers" in the front, making it the new rear of the arrow as it inverted.
@@WarDucc well, rockets have a center of lift and they are essentially oversized missiles.
For missiles, center of lift isn't about generating enough lift to take flight, it's about keeping the missile stable during flight. If the center of lift is ahead of the center of mass in the direction the missile is moving, then the missile will attempt to invert itself, since the center of lift always tries to stay behind the center of mass for stability. To counteract that, missiles have fins on the rear that push the center of lift behind.
However, when the missile is vertically falling and the parachute is installed on the nose, then the original design is very unideal, as the missile will now try to fall nose first to maintain stability. To counteract this, we need to push the center of lift further up the missile. The team here achieved this by jettisoning the fins, which pushes the center of lift further up so that the missile can fall thruster down.
thanks!@@davidlee1770
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Undergraduate Innovation Lab. This is what the credit says at the end of the videos.
If you student of that university please contact with me
Undergrads? These dudes are hardcore
That university is closely associated with multiple Chinese weapons programmes, so I'm not surprised. 😂
@@alfatejpblind6498 we're doing this in highschool rn, we got the tvc working
omg undergraduate??
Ejecting the fins to change the center of pressure is so smart
But why not connect them to the fuselage with a thin cable?
@@DreamInProgess Are you saying to raise and lower them? that would require some sort of actuator or spring based mechanism to move them, the reaction forces would probably be weird too. ejection is probably the least complex mechanism to remove the fins and make it so the rocket naturally wants to point down after it hits the highest point in its travel.
@@qualifiednot I think he means using a thin wire to retain them as they eject
What is the purpose of ejecting the fins at the rocket's apogee? You mention changing the COP, but to what end?
@@evanweir169 fins causes more drag at the back of the center of the mass thus would make the rocket wanna point towards the ground on the descend so they couldn't use the parachute effectively . Wires on fins could still cause the same effect as fins would float up relative to the rocket on the descend and would still be pulling the bottom of the vechile and force it to point downwards .
貴團隊對於不同功能模塊所做的驗證是令我最驚豔的部分，就算以業界眼光來看也是做得很完整，可以想見貴團隊系統化設計思維之完善。如果我要指導學生做工程專案，我一定會推薦他們這個影片。
台灣造火箭算了吧,全台頂大加總搞得飛鼠還不如人家一個本科社團的東西有看頭
这些人毕业后可是要去造大火箭和军用导弹的。
@@Proempireking等你捐款啊～😂😂😂
绝对地！ 作为一个英裔美国人，我也会做同样的事情。 做得好！
这哥们是南航的大一学生，最早视频发bilibili的@@Proempireking
There's still hope for the generations to come. glad to see these awesome geeks kicking the coolness out of measuring levels
obviously? new generation is always more advanced with the amount of resources and total knowledge increasing
Yep you are right, there is always a percentage of people who are interested in different things, and the harder things are there will be less people interested in, or specializing in. There is nothing easy to watch TikTok all day, and the hard things, for example learning how to make missiles, drones, planes cars....@@ege8240
Incredible control nice work guys ! As someone with a control engineering background this is a very hard project to pull off. Well done
ive seen more stable fireworks
]
With control engineering background, I don't think it looks hard. A simple pid controller should work. The hardest part comes wih trajectory control which in turn boils down to navigation part.
@@TrungNguyen-mj2idas someone with a control engineering background, this is not an easy project to pull off.
as someone with a control engineering background, this is not an easy project to pull off.
@@TrungNguyen-mj2id as someone with a control engineering background, this is not an easy project to pull off x3.
That looks really cool, thanks for showing the cad models and the inside as well :)
As a mechanical engineer. This really is very impressive...
We used to play with rockets 35 years ago. But with what is available now, you have a world of exploration extra. Nice job ! Keep up the fun for the rest of your lifes.
hi micheldriessen, have you become a flat earther yet?
@@flat-earther meow
@@flat-earthermeow
As an engineer, I salute.
I think what impresses me the most here is how compact/efficient the form factor is given the capability set this thing has.
he really said: "i aint spending 500 thousand dollars on an AIM 9L, i guess ill have to make one" lol nice job
Next step is adding this inertial nav to a model airplane.
After that, TERCOM via optics
Your work is amazing , keep it up
Just when I thought I was an "engineer"; all those young man are TRUE engineers. Probably in a thousand years I will be able to scratch 2% of what they already know... Such a charming thought, isn't it?
If you were not in a list before, you are now. If I ever become half as good an engineer as you are, I’ll die a happy man.
My day gets better any time L Shang uploads
Your videos inspire me. Aboslutely amazing work. Im so happy to see you have the resources to execute such a cool project.
Most importantly, it looks like China has made a mechanism that brings creativity into creation.
@@AhmedAdly11 what do you call the mechanism. the one that brings creativity into creation?
@@evanweir169 one good mechanism is supporting students to carry out projects.
In Egypt, such a project would be banned on the basis of national security. (it is a 7 year jail for using a drone)
@@AhmedAdly11 it's really sad that they kill the people's creativity and productivity.
@@kioly_ah If you come from a free country, you could not imagine.
Military dictatorship is a horrible thing.
China is lucky in comparison. Also, they went from dark to light!
So what we see now should be considered incredible leaps forward. Also that they will continue in that direction.
This is incredible! Insanely impressive work
Tam beklediğim performans. Çok güzel çalışma olmuş. Zekice düşünülmüş bir sistem. Roketin kalkış esnasında yalpalanma olmaması için eksenini düzelten bir kanat sistemi (gyroskop ile ) yapılmış. Cidden çok havalı ve güzel. Tebrik ederim.
انا مهتم هذا شيء ولكن لدي سؤال ما هي هذه الدائرة إلكترونية المربوطة مع بعضها البعض
Each time I see young people create I feel hope for the world.
You better understand what you wish for in the context of geopolitical paradigm
@@gybob100 it is shifting
After watching this video thoroughly on multiple occasions.
I can confirm without any doubt that the missile knows where it is at all times.
(It knows this because it knows where it isn't.)
I have been wondering, how important is it to place an IMU at the exact center of mass? It looks like most systems keep the chips very close to this center, but a few millimeters off of the center doesn’t affect accuracy in any negative way.
Beautiful work on this guidance system!
Theres only two thing missing in the rocket, copper and some explosives 😅
@@trollmanman5576that's on our channel lol
@@trollmanman5576 just one Copper rod and a cone away from being an ATGM
If your IMU is mounted with separation from your COM, then it will detect spurious linear accelerations when the vehicle experiences any sort of angular rate or angular acceleration. Provided that this is characterised beforehand and filtered out of the IMU output, there should be no issues.
in the center pc is for gyroscopes or needs use more than bigger mass more devices more issues Russians use hydraulic or pneumatic people already found lot of pneumatic cylinders from control systems like missile have a gas tank for 200 -300 movements electric can give big angles but is low on power and if long fly need big power supply, some of them missiles have gas collecting tubes like ak 47 power get from gas exhaust and who have seen big missiles have whole space engine in missiles with liquid fuel turbine like from the car and very poison fuel -and police don't like these toys if 6kilos toy can demolish tank -is not Soo toy to be played
-russian like to show s500 but speed climb trajectory change it probably is empty same is them nukes by size and weight why make AAmisilles like nukes? carriers don't fly and size of hellfire is more than enough
some countries cant pull this off .... but these kids did .
My man out here making a guided missile.
a missile by definition is guided
Very impressive work guys, I'm sure you have a bright future with those kind of skills.
As in a nuclear bomb flash type of a bright future
These Oriental boys are quite smart at making these electronic thingies. Didn't take millions to make this. I'm sure the Hamas boys will be thankful.
I’ve been subbed for a while and wow I can’t believe the progress.
everybody gangsta until the anti gravity ships are watching you all, crows of judgement
Soo inspiring! Keep up the great work!
Why do the fins "eject" at 1:16?
Great video! Thanks for sharing your work with us.
Pretty sure so that the rocket flies straight down before recovery parachutes deploy
@@bb-bricks3040 I think you are correct. I don't understand why they want the rocket traveling straight down. It sure seems like it would be hard to find those fins again.
There's probably a good reason for doing it this way, I just don't understand it.
@@ddegn if you can see those fins on the back help control the rocket and the top (or front) part is chamfered for aerodynamics. Because of their 90 degree trapezoidal design as well as the positioning (you don't want control fins on the front of your rocket), they would negatively affect its aerodynamics.
@@bb-bricks3040 I can see how ejecting the fins improve aerodynamics, I just think it's an interesting choice to discard the fins. I wonder if the fins are considered disposable. It sure seems like it would be hard to find the fins after each launch. Of course with 3D printing those fins could be replace with very little effort and very little cost.
My wondering about the fins shouldn't be taken as criticism of the rocket design. I think the rocket is amazing.
Because I want the Rocket to maintain the upward attitude in order to control the trajectory of the decline process, and I will try to use a reverse engine to land in the future.
Made my Day .... incredible work!
L Shang you have superb, knowledge and talent in all things rockets and drones. Very impressive rocket that was 3 D Printed and all the Rocket Guidance that you put together .
Boss level activated
well done
最高点分离尾翼改变压心真是太妙了。而且竟然没有爆炸螺栓，纯粹的机械加弹簧安全又可靠。牛逼！！！
Great work thanks a lot for sharing
This is the first time i see the "remove before flight" properly used
Great project and great video🙌🙌
What we need actually object detection using opensource project like OpenCV
what software appears at minute 1 ? what are you testing? some sort of IMU ?
Awesome work! Very inspiring.
_Hamas joined the chat._
Nik lyhoud hhhh
I dont see a place to put explosives 😂
God bless for this :)
GLORIOUS AND DIVINE 👁️👃👁️🙏
Teach us your Skills !
I like how you guys can build this stuff. In Poland they would hunt down such engineer and prosecute him until he would "shit himself".
Great work with sensor fusion algorithm.
pretty sure any american who watches this would be put on a special government list too so, not too far off
AGH robi rakiety głupi mośku.
@rickson50
Basically, the rule of thumb is to keep it vertical, also no targeting systems.
You break those rules, well, that's a felony
Join a rocketry club or create a UA-cam channel? As long as you have a valid reason the powers that be seem content to leave people alone.
@@noahw4623t is actually perfectly legal to design and build guided rockets in America. We have the 2nd amendment, after all. If they have explosives attached, then it is a little more complicated but still possible. Testing them can become a lot more complicated as there are FAA (surprisingly not ATF) regulations that prevent guided rocket testing without special permission. Guided meaning that it lands in a specific location.
It’s a lot easier to design, test and deploy autonomous loitering munitions that do not use rocket motors, like the switchblade drones and the like, these days if you are a budding Tony Stark.
The missile that knows where it is by knowing where it isn't. Brilliant!
Engineers 1 second after they graduate (they love the military industrial complex)
Tbf most cutting edge is in that sector
КРУТО!!! вы супер !!! удачи вам в дальнейшем!!! печально что у нас такие таланты не поддерживает государство...
Beautiful. I think I'm gonna go design something now
WOW! Nice skills dude. Awesome work.
Damn, western kids are learning how to twirk and here the Chinese are learning rocket science
In fact, they come from Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics. This university is one of China's seven most renowned military engineering universities and was among the first to be sanctioned by the United States. These young students will undoubtedly go on to work on real missiles in the future.
下次加个遥控 再让它飞回来。省得去捡它😊😊😊
How can you just walk around with it at the park without making rocket noises and pretending it is flying???? That was some impressive self control, I would definitely be like "FSHHHHHHHHHHHHHFSHHHHFSHHHH!!!" every time I carried it around. Amazing project I am really impressed!
Also if you do ever need someone to follow the rocket around wherever it goes making rocket noises, I am your man.
Everything looks so well made! Awesome work! how long did it take from start to good launch? Did you use any open-source software? In particular for flight control or cad designs?
That was awesome. Gread job. That was very satisfying to watch :)
imagine having an education system so fucking good that your under grad student are capable of manufacturing gbs guided weapons
Very good work 👍, I appreciate your
Could this be used by ground units to take out hostile quadcopter drones or other small RC?
Diy missile PagMan
Just keeps getting better and better!
Chinese kids having more advanced guidance tech than russian military missiles is pretty funny.
Edit: called them korean when they're chinese, bit of an oops.
Hey Wulfleyn, appreciate your sense of humor! Just to clarify, the kids in the video are actually from China, not Korea. While their technology might not be on par with military-grade missiles, it's still fascinating to see how far technology has come and how it's accessible to people of all ages. Cheers! 😊
@@lshang882 Oh sorry, still cool though, I have problems with distinguishing languages in general so sorry for that.
@@wulfleyn6498 can these kids make hypersonic ones ??? Russia has 1 u.s has 0 maybe you need to open your eyes to reality
@@raydeemedretard
This is INSANE. Congratulations, guys! Truly impressed.
hi eliteworm, have you become a flat earther yet?
Amazing quality!
B站上早就关注了，这里也来支持一把！
Ever considered to making this whole project open source? i would like to help with the design but also perhaps scaling it up.
i mean id like that too but tbh i feel like such systems most likely fall under multiple countries regulations of weapon systems just like passive radar code and so son with the kraken SDR not sure if Japan has such regulations not to mention the huge amount of risk this would add for terror attacks and other things like assassinations which in japan are pretty on topic rn so i think the release of the code would be more unlikely, although this may be sweet to send the FSB a present from some activists in Russia this would be hecking sick for causing chaos inland russia
ua-cam.com/video/c94bALAgENM/v-deo.html but maybe this would help ya to some extend
I believe this was developed within a University institution and I don't think China has any interests in making such projects open source.
@@danielevendrame9350 Hong kong
It would get beaten the shit up by ITAR
love the work you did on this rocket
Insane as per usual
Nice work 😊
that’s amazing!
just casually made a SAM and prolly gonna have a visit from guys in black suits
similar to a ballistic missile but a mini version
This was well shot and produced! Kudos!
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't, by subtracting where it is, from where it isn't, or where it isn't, from where it is, whichever is greater, it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance sub-system uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is, to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position where it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event of the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has required a variation. The variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too, may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computance scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is, however it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subracts where it should be, from where it wasn't, or vice versa. By differentiating this from the algebraic sum og where it shouldn't be, and where it was. It is able to obtain a deviation, and a variation, which is called "air"
Wow! Absolutely incredible work.
Chinese students: "We developed a missile flight trajectory control system while still at university."
U.S. students: "There are 47 genders."
You kidding?? Those 47 genders could be weaponized as "freedom" bullet
Unbelievable work, great job!!
Homemade HIMARS hahaha
Fantastic work, 😊 from Ireland 🇮🇪
Can I buy this project? I will use it to improve the environment, cure disease, improve society and bring democracy where it is needed.
llol
I think you are studying in Tsingua? I have been there for a visiting very lovely stay. Keep it up, ad astra per aspera!
Awesome weapons 👏👏👏👏👏👏
2:30 what software did u use to visualize the rocket movement ?
also want to know this
I am a 15 year old girl its so fascinating to watch these
Did a laser guided model rocket back in the 80's with nowhere near the tech used here. Photodiodes and 741 op amps for the most part. Tube launched and two staged. Could hit within 4 feet of the aim point at 500 yards.
yes
I'd love to hear more about this one...
Хорошая работа Олег!
Scary stuff, I hope the nsa is closely watching everyone watching this video.
watching this from gaza
@@العقيدمعمرالقذافي-ح4ف بعدك عايش؟🥺
As somebody who's in "the business" for real, I'm very impressed.
sehr interessant, anspruchsvolle Technik!👍👍👍
The next project is to launch the rocket into outer space. Congratulations on your remarkable achievement.
What's that grid table top cover called.. I have tried searching on Google but couldn't find
Wow.. impressive 👌
Guys this is so cool.
Great job!! I would love to build too.
This is exceptional, great work !
Man wait till his supervillain arc starts
Congratulations loved the video
rocket with indie pop goes hard together
Very very, very impressive ....imagine the hard work and determination needed to create such a project ....