Thank you so much for recording those lectures and doing them so well, at this point I can’t count the number of times this helped me fill gaps lectures at my university left.
To think that at MIT he explains the "solution" in a more intuitive way, an my professor just derived everything using Green's functions... Sometimes more difficult is not better
Thank you so much for recording those lectures and doing them so well, at this point I can’t count the number of times this helped me fill gaps lectures at my university left.
To think that at MIT he explains the "solution" in a more intuitive way, an my professor just derived everything using Green's functions... Sometimes more difficult is not better
I personally like the Green's function derivation more. The spherical wave Ansatz falls out of it quite neatly.
Thanks 🤍❤️
This is helpful ❤️🤍
thanks
reference book?
Actually the syllabus lists seven books: ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-06-quantum-physics-iii-spring-2018/syllabus/. Best wishes on your studies!
(Del^2 + k^2 ) exp( i k r ) = 0
is true, isn't it?
it's not true since Laplace operator in spherical coordinates is not partial/partial r
it's not true since Laplace operator in spherical coordinates is not partial/partial r
Nope, here laplacian is in spherical coordinates