Another set of examples prior to the time period in this video: Iran declared neutrality in both world wars, but was invaded and occupied by the Allies both times anyway. The occupation during WW1 created a famine that killed millions. The resentment from those occupations is still present even 100 years later.
100 years later?? Honest to god, do you know how time works? Who is alive who occupied them or who can remember the occupation? Millions of minorities people are currently occupied by Iranians. Azerbaijanis, kurds etc. You can nurse your grievances or you can be a useful person in the world. Very rarly are both possible.
@@ElBandito Their borders were set without consent of many of the minority ethnicities within Iran. That's how. There are or have been many separatist movements within Iran, the Kurds, the Arabs, Balochis, Assyrians, Azeris, and probably others. All of Iran's borders throughout history were set by conquest until modern sovereign borders began to be internationally respected (or I should say, more respected) in the 20th century. Borders didn't just magically appear out of nowhere.
@@manchasdos a previous video in this series explained that there was honestly no good way draw borders in this region Preventing war was pretty much impossible
Many people in these comments for some reason do not seem to notice that this is part 20 out of 24, there have been 20 hour+ long episodes on this series...
they are not hated in the middle east. middle east loves them for the most part. they have to put on a show for their socialist brethren that america opposes so those arab ideas dont spread to other regions. you hate america and want others to hate them too
The West has intervened in the Middle East many times, colonized our countries and stolen our wealth, but when we practice the same, we become the ones who are wrong.
At 11.00 he mentions bashir al saadawi, i am one of his relatives Al saddawi helped the king just for the sake of keeping the state united Then they sold him out. Sad ending
@@PIOVRAME and even you don't know your history morocco was one if not the first countrie to recognize the Us as a independent countrie and the Us oldest treaty called the treaty of friendship was between them and morocco.And gues what morocco is an Islamic country
It's because of already existing intolerance and hatred for new ideas and other religions + colonialism. Pre-european-colonialism islamic texts (including the Quran) already expressed hate and intolerance towards Christians, just like most Christians hated Muslims at the time. It's important to mention that this hate that spawned later on was not just due to European colonialism. In Lebanon, for example, the Ottomans ruled for more than 400 years and stole food, money, houses when there was a war, hundreds of thousands would die from hunger, disease, execution by the Ottomans....... The french ruled for about 23+ years, lied about giving Lebanon its independence after WW2, and cracked down on nationalists (including executing them), but they didn't steal any gold, diamonds, oil, gas, or anything of this sort (because Lebanon doesn't have any). Yes Lebanon's economic situation was very bad during WW2 but famines weren't as common or deadly as under the Ottomans. Not to mention, most of Lebanon's roads used today were build by the French (they also built a rail transport system that became defunct after the civil war, schools, libraries...). So french rule (in Lebanon specifically) was bad but not as bad as Ottoman rule, even though most Lebanese people have much more distrust for the French (especially among Muslims) than the Ottomans. And it's not like they forgot about what the ottomans did, every student is taught about it in history classes and Ottomans only gave up Lebanon in 1918, not a long time ago. I also think those feelings are because of a global movement that criticizes European-Western colonialism but doesn't mention other forms of colonialism/invasions that were just as brutal (including Ottoman, Russian, Persian...).
“Why do these people hate us?” “You think it has something to do with the fact that we brutally oppressed and stole shit from them for countless years?” “Nah that can’t be it there just stupid, that’s the issue!”
Hey Jazby, do you know what's up with these comments? They're all quite strange. PS - What database(s) do you use for your sourcing? If you can let me know that'd be wonderful, otherwise, I completely understand.
I think he bots comments on his videos to create engagement for the algorithm and that's why it looks like this but I'm just guessing and a look into his account on Twitter shows that he delves into Wikipedia pages and cites sources from people at the time and I guess he is an OG into internet researching for how long he has been doing this UA-cam thing even though he caught some flack in the past on Reddit but you can bet that his sources are somewhat trusted and mostly from Reddit, Wikipedia and research papers.
@@garrettredding2837 Well, one citation he used here was for sure the wilson center report titled "Syria's 1956 Soviet request for military intervention" and read through that crazy description. You will go nuts.
Nah. It’s bc Their Religion is aso a political ideology of global conquest & it is so dominant and past of the culture. Osama bin Ladin said the crusades were on-going and he attacked us, in part, bc we “stole” Spain from them. 😂
14:18 This is not entirely true. Firstly, the place supposedly bombed was not the Turkish consulate; it was the house that Atatürk was born in. Secondly, there was no actual bombing; what happened was government aligned newspapers ran stories that said that “Rumlar Atamızın evini bombaladılar!” (The Greeks have bombed the home of our Great Father!). Menderes government was responsible for all these things, as well as the CIA lead “Tactical Mobilization Group” (later renamed to Special Warfare Departmant, the Turkish Branch of Gladio).
"communists were acheiving victories across the world including ... eastern europe" Yes being conquered by the soviet union after ww2 I suppose is a communist victory...
No. Whatever we would have done, they wouldn't be happy. If we united them under a single Arabia? They'd have complained we didn't take religion and culture differences into consideration. If we divided it based on that? They'd complain we divided Arabs.
They have been free to change their own borders since they are independent. But they haven't, msotly. And in the cases they did, not a single time have they done it without a violent war.
@@alfrancisbuada2591 they would have just fought among themselves as they did after WW1 lol. They're a tribal society. Civilisation building was beyond their comprehension
Tacitus, Annals: «Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, was given death penalty during the reign of Tiberius by one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and this most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judæa, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind». Shaved monogamous pork-eating pagans tortured to death bearded radical Believers from the Middle East. For what? not for alleged controlled demolishions of two or more towers (which they highly suspected to be Nero's false flag operation), but for our "hatred against mankind". It is true that we, believers, do "hate" deviant pagans, yet it is more disgust than emotional hate. And if you fear discrimination you can use old trick - pretend you are German, they were historically respected by Muslims. And noone discriminated after becoming our brother or sister in Faith, whether it West or East
Why they do? Not why the west hates the Middle East? I'm not sure how honest of a "historian" jabzy is. The question itself is set on a premise that would make an uninformed reader think the "Middle East" (a British misnomer, originally made for the Balkans) is actively invading the west. Which is strange, given that not a single country of theirs landed a single soldier or battalion, or declared a war over the past century. Anyways, he begins the video out of context. He omitted the fact that all those supposed armies that were fighting the Zs were under the British Crown. None had training, or even half adequate weaponry. Not to mention, the other side, had weapon shipments from the Czechs that had recently arrived, in addition to the Crown's support and training beforehand (though there were divisions in the inside factions). But focusing on more contemporary issues. The "Costs of War" study by brown in 2021 has these figures for the past 20 years of engagement of US policy: indirect deaths 4.5-4.7 million, direct 905-940,000 , in other words 6 million deaths and 38 million displaced. This is relevant because of the Oded Yinon Plan. More on the Oded Yinon plan - According to the founding father of zionism, theodore hertzel, the area of the jewish state stretches from the brook of Egypt to the Euphrates; the promised land extends from the river of Egypt up to the Euphrates and includes parts of Syria and Lebanon; when viewed in the current context including the siege on Gaza the zionist plan for the middle east bears an intimate relationship to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the 2006 war in Lebanon, the 2011 war on Libya and Syria and the continued crisis in Iraq and Yemen, not to mention the political crisis in the kingdom of saudi Arabia. In the 1980s an article written by a former senior official with the israeli foreign ministry in which israel shahak wrote a forward to which says "in my opinion the accurate and detailed plan of the present zionist regime of ariel sharon for the middle east which is based on the division of the whole area into small states and the dissolution of all the existing Arab states."
He mentions the Arab leaders which did in fact form strategy with the Nazis. This isn't done in bad faith. Only if you're used to dishonest media which paints hamas as a victim
Wikipedia Yinon Plan He then proceeds to analyze the weaknesses of Arab countries, by citing what he perceives to be flaws in their national and social structures, concluding that Israel should aim to bring about the fragmentation of the Arab world into a mosaic of ethnic and confessional groupings. 'Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation,' he argued, would prove to be advantageous to Israel in the short term. He saw contemporary events in Lebanon as a foreshadowing of future developments overall throughout the Arab world. The upheavals would create a precedent for guiding Israeli short-term and long-term strategies. Specifically, he asserted that the immediate aim of policy should be the dissolution of the military capabilities of Arab states east of Israel, while the primary long-term goal should work towards the formation of unique areas defined in terms of ethnonational and religious identities.
@FarberBob678 most of the Arab countries wanted not the land but to wipe out Jews. That's pretty much the lingering issue which drove much of this. Egypt has moved on, maybe Palestine will get the message soon and retune the hostages to end this.
Summary of the vid: Egypt had main character syndrome then switched sides and became Israel's best friend and a "Blessing" for Israel (According to Benjamin Netanyahu himself)
@@PasteurizedLettuce not really... they are just tired of caring for other Arabs. so they decided that they shouldn't even belong to them. Technically speaking, Egypt and Israel are so ethnically related.
@@manofsteal5066 fuck no , there is no relation between Egyptians and European Jews, and they all hate you , they are just powerless because the government is dictatorship
The causalities of the Iraq conflict was mostly due to conflict between Iraqi militias and government not the US's initial invasion specifically And this video talks about in general sudden anti western hate didn't emerge in the 2000s but has existed a while back including your lovely dictator Saddam Hussein who was the only one to not condemn 9/11
Why cut it off at 1500AD? Vienna was attacked in the late 1680s. The Barbary Corsairs captured ships in the English channel in the 18th century and sold the captives as slaves. Europeans and others were taken as slaves by the Barbary pirates as late as the 1850s. Algeria became a French colony because the French were determined to end piracy and slave raiding in the Mediterranean Sea.
@@thomasdevine867 and why start at 600 AD? Roman and Greek conquest of the Levant, the attempted crucifixion or Jesus Christ PBUH, the wars between Rome and Persia all predate Islam
1500? The "Costs of War" study by brown in 2021 has these figures for the past 20 years of engagement of US policy: indirect deaths 4.5-4.7 million, direct 905-940,000 , in other words 6 million deaths and 38 million displaced. This is relevant because of the Oded Yinon Plan.
@@thomasdevine867 oh no playing the victim again.. Budd you Christians killed more Christians than Muslims ever did You enslaved more people than the opposite You killed and butchered natives of the Americas, even their animals World wars claimed more lives than any others in history But cope harder lol
Why tf Pakistan didn't adopt Arabic as their official language when it got separated from india (1947)as it was created for the Muslims They claim arab descends , then why not adopted their masters language Their history starts from arab conquests of sindh They deny their hindu heritage then why choose (urdu) a language Which originated from Sanskrit During partition 95% people of Pakistan don't spoke urdu Urdu belongs to Indian Muslims That's the one thing I don't understand till now
I've seen so many videos of this guy by now and they all follow the same framing tactics. Loaded questions as clickbait video titles frame the narrative perfectly, while he retells events happening over a whole world region, always implying that these procedures are unique to the middle east. Jabzy's video catalogue is the epitome of orientalist history revisionism, this is especially clear when you realize the dude can't even read any middle eastern language and thus has to rely on sources from outside of the region. Don't get me wrong, the infos he provides are correct as far as I know, but the narrative he is supplying doesn't necessarily follow from that - but from his framing.
Just on the previous episode for example he mentioned a plan to poison the water supply, this fantasy was one that was actually attempted , and they accused others of doing it. Operation Nakam.
Easiest rhetorical question of all time. Great vid as always. I wonder when this series will end? The comments will get really spicy by then. I’ll try to restrain myself.
Wdym end? He can keep doing videos on this doomed region for the next 5 years and just by then he might cover the history up until 1979 and after 1979's islamic revolution there is crazy events you might be flabbergasted with and then there is the history after 9/11 which by itself might take 5 years alone in the making. This region is doomed to repeat mistakes because they don't learn from the past so until they figure that out... expect more videos.
@ Their only mistake has been not all banding together to expel the Americans and Zionists, but thankfully they’re starting to figure that out. All jokes aside, he could spend several hours talking about the Lebanese Civil War alone, so point taken.
Christendom was always an empirial religion, born under the auspices of constantine, the subjects were converted at the edge of the sword and rendered into slaves for his majesty, often referring to him as their lord. In Islam such slavery is unthinkable. The only lordship is that of the creator, no station into which man was brought into the lands of Islam was to any degree as bad as the repugnant chattel slavery brought by the primitive tribalism inherent in their texts. Constantine chose regularly to refer to himself as the “servant of God” (famulus dei/therapon tou theou) in official writings. By the fifth century, this metaphor of subordination had been redeployed from theological to political contexts as the subjects of the emperor came to refer to themselves as “slaves of the emperor.” And by the sixth, Justinian insisted all his officials swear an oath that they would demonstrate their service to the emperor “with genuine slavehood” (gnesia douleia).b Building on Paul’s revalorization of the vocabulary of slavery, and particularly the word doulos came to be applied to a variety of hierarchical relationships, even as it also continued to be used specifically of chattel slaves. By the middle Byzantine period, this expansion of the semantic range of the root doul- eventually gave the abstract nominal form douleia, meaning laborer Insofar as everyone who partook in labor was considered to be a participant This epistemological world view is coherent with master-slave dynamic relationship between the head of the state and his subjects, or rather slaves. The word עוֹלֵל, ʿôlēl which means 'Babe, infant, little one, a suckling' occurs 21 King James Bible Verses Of these verses: “Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.” -Psalm 137:9 “Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.”-1 Samuel 15:3 “Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.”-Hosea 13:16 The other verses are not much different. Infact it is always in association with violence. Indeed these verses are the reason why in the Crusades the sense of pious rejoicing at massacre does not appear to be the product of later theologizing; it is also found, in the account of the eye-witness Raymond of Aguilers: “in the Temple and porch of Solomon, men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins. Indeed, it was a just and splendid judgment of God that this place should be filled with the blood of the unbelievers, since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies.” In fact, Raymond continues, “This day, I say, will be famous in all future ages, for it turned our labours and sorrows into joy and exultation; this day, I say, marks the justification of all Christianity, the humiliation of paganism, and the renewal of our faith.” Another account by a chronicler and eyewitness-priest, Albert of Aachen, describes the killing of fleeing women, and depicts crusaders as:: “seizing [infants who were still suckling] by the soles of their feet from their mothers’ laps or their cradles…and dashing them against the walls or lintels of the doors and breaking their necks […] they were sparing absolutely no gentile of any age or kind.”The incoherence inherent in a stranger to Abraham calling the children of Abraham gentiles notwithstanding, this account evokes the very same Psalm 137:9 imprecation against Babylon, in Latin, “beatus qui tenebit et adlidet parvulos tuos ad petram.” Albert describes a massacre occurring, in cold blood, on the second day following the conquest, painting a scene that is as horrific as it is realistic and detailed: "Girls, women, matrons, tormented by fear of imminent death and horror-struck by the violent murder wrapped themselves around the Christians’ bodies in the hope to save their lives, even as the Christians were raving and venting their rage in murder of both sexes. Some threw themselves at their feet, begging them with pitiable weeping and wailing for their lives and safety. When children five or three years old saw the cruel fate of their mothers and fathers, of one accord they stepped up the weeping and pitiable clamour. But they were making these signals for pity and mercy in vain. For the Christians gave over their whole hearts to murder, so that not a suckling little male-child or female, not even an infant of one year would escape the hand of the murderer". Evoking several of these verses in practice: - (Num 31:17-18) Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves. - (Deut 7:2, 9:3, Num 21) thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them... - (Ezek 9:6) Slay utterly old [and] young both maids and little children and women: but come not near any man upon whom [is] mark begin at my sanctuary. This is the polar opposite in the Quran in Surah Al-Tanwir, literally "The Englightenining" Surah, Aya 8-9, we have the death of a newborn is mentioned amongst the penultimate signs of the end of times, emphasizing the gravity of such an action. That child, now resurrected, is asked for what wrong doing was she murdered. This is to emphasize that she had done nothing wrong, for she had done nothing wrong and this is the day of retribution where those who omitted the evil are to be punished. This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190, which exhorts to fight unbelievers and not be "Aggressors", in the commentary of what it means to be aggressors, this was stated Al-Hasan Al-Basri stated that transgression (indicated by the Ayah): "includes mutilating the dead, theft (from the captured goods), killing women, children and old people who do not participate in warfare, killing priests and residents of houses of worship, burning down trees and killing animals without real benefit."
This is also the opinion of Ibn `Abbas, `Umar bin `Abdul-`Aziz, Muqatil bin Hayyan and others. Muslim recorded in his Sahih that Buraydah narrated that Allah's Messenger said: "Fight for the sake of Allah and fight those who disbelieve in Allah. Fight, but do not steal, commit treachery, mutilate, or kill a child, or those who reside in houses of worship." It is reported in the Two Sahihs that Ibn `Umar said, "The Prophet forbade killing women and children." بابتداء القتال أو بقتال من نهيتم عن قتاله من النساء والشيوخ والصبيان والذين بينكم وبينهم عهد أو بالمثلة أو بالمفاجأة من غير دعوة "To kill those whom you were forbidden to from women, elderly, children and those whom betwixt you is a treaty or custom or by surprise or without cause" -Tafsir Al-Zamakshari of the meaning of Aggressors in the Aya More hadith from Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah: حَدَّثَنَا حُمَيْدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ شَيْخٍ، مِنْ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ مَوْلَى لِبَنِي عَبْدِ الْأَشْهَلِ، عَنْ دَاوُدَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كَانَ إِذَا بَعَثَ جُيُوشَهُ قَالَ: «§لَا تَقْتُلُوا أَصْحَابَ الصَّوَامِعِ» "Do not kill the dwellers of monasteries" حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ فُضَيْلٍ، عَنْ جُوَيْبِرٍ، عَنِ الضَّحَّاكِ قَالَ: كَانَ «§يُنْهَى عَنْ قَتْلِ الْمَرْأَةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ» سَعْدٍ قَالَ: «§نَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ قَتْلِ النِّسَاءِ وَالذُّرِّيَّةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ الَّذِي لَا حَرَاكَ بِهِ» "The prophet forbids the killing of women, children, and the elderly" This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Anfal Ayah 61 in which even oath breaking deniers/unbelievers are allowed to sue for peace states if the unbelievers they ask for peace, give it to them. Stephen Langton, the writer of the Magna Carta (12th century, contemporary with the crusades for a reason) studied in the university of Paris which archives show had plenty of Arabic treatises in its procession, there can be no question about it being inspired by the "Sharia". both the renessiance and the european enlightenment were directly preceded by massive translation movements form Arabic (see the Republic of Letters by Alexander Bevilacqua, The House of Wisdom: How the Arabs Transformed Western Civilization By: Jonathan Lyons. The modifiable testament testament commands indiscriminate killing, genocide, plunder, mutilation, enslavement, or torture of enemies, including women, on the other hand.Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190 limits war to those who fight against Muslims, prohibits transgression, and implies respect for human dignity and life Indeed it is what precedes the famous "sword verse", always cited out of context. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
I'll argue that both religious are imperialist. Rashidun, Umayyad, Seljuk, Ayyubid, Ottoman and Mughal. All of these entities were Muslim yet they conquered people in the name of Islam, loot and conquest. Also, why did some Muslim countries criminalize slavery too late into the 1900's? I know that this might be contradictory to your beliefs but please accept that both of these faiths wanted slaves, especially the latter.
That argument would not be fruitful. Reason being how bloodless they were, indeed it is the rteason why the region still has so many creeds, unlike any other place in the world until the modern era. Indeed it's the reason why people make a big deal out of the jizya forgetting that for the last several centuries the romans extracted a far greater tax poll. The Muslims/Arabs were spread out far too thin to weather a local rebellion had it been as oppressive as apologists claim. Unlike the mongols who ruled a large spat of territory by eradicating the local populace while themselves being few in number, The Muslims were so few in numbers, especially compared to the urban settled populations conquered; That it was by just administration that they ruled the territories. The tribute under the commander who took Egypt, Amr ibn Alas for example was 12,000,000 dinars, Khaukianos, the last Byzantine prefect of Egypt levied 20,000,000 gold dinars. To compare, in order to take Gaul Caesar eradicated an estimate of half the population, inaddition during Roman rule of Egypt, Egypt was not regarded as part of the roman territory but as an asset and personal property of the emperor himself, thereby providing for nearly 2 thirds of the roman treasury, on the other hand during Muslim Rule not only had the soldiers not been allowed to enter liberated cities, they were not allowed to buy land or settle either. In Egypt for example, the caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab restored the Coptic pope Benjamin I (622-661) to his seat after he had been in exile for 13 years under the Byzantine emperor Heraclius. With regards to the conduct of the commander who took Egypt, Amr ibn Alas with the Coptic pope we have this accounts written by Severus of Ashmunein a coptic priest and historian: "Then Amr turned to him, and said to him: "Resume the government of all your churches and of your people, and administer their affairs. And if you will pray for me, that I may go to the West and to Pentapolis, and take possession of them, as I have of Egypt, and return to you in safety and speedily, I will do for you all that you shall ask of me." Then the holy Benjamin prayed for Amr, and pronounced an eloquent discourse, which made Amr and those present with him marvel, and which contained words of exhortation and much profit for those that heard him; and he revealed certain matters to Amr, and departed from his presence honored and revered. And all that the blessed father said to the commander Amr, he found true, and not a letter of it was unfulfilled." -History of the Patriarchs of Alexandria Amr, upon the request of the Caliph Umar, asked the Patriarch Benjamin what was the best way of keeping the country in order and raising the revenue. The conditions laid down by the Patriarch were these: (1) that the taxes should be collected at the right time (the end of the agricultural season) (2) that no taxes should be demanded after the vintage; (3) that the canals should be dug out yearly; (4) that the dykes and sluice-gates should be kept in repair; (5) that no unjust or tyrannical official should be appointed. The Chronicle of John, Bishop of Nikiu writes about Amr "And he exacted the taxes which had been determined upon, but he took none of the property of the Churches, and he committed no act of spoliation or plunder, and he preserved them throughout all his days.", He writes in a later section regarding the city of Alexandria and that its previous unjust governor Menas had the pol tax of the city to be 32,057 gold dinars while Amr deposed him for a person loved by the people that had been exiled by Heraclius named John and had it set at 22,000. Regarding the appointment he writes "Now he had been appointed prefect of the city of Alexandria when Amr entered it. And this John had compassion on the poor, and gave generously to them out of his possessions. And seeing their affliction he had mercy upon them, and wept over their lot. Amr deposed Menas and appointed John in his stead." Ibn `Abd al Hakam (187 - 257 A.H/ 800-871 C.E ) writes that when `Amr was firmly established, he made the Copts pay a similar tribute to that exacted by the Romans, but it was to fluctuate in proportion to their wealth and prosperity. This can only mean that he continued the Roman system of land-tax: for the poll-tax imposed by the Arabs was a fixed payment, while undoubtedly the land-tax varied in accordance with the rise of the Nile and the general conditions of agriculture. Ibn `Abd al Hakam goes on to say that it was the duty of the village headmen to meet and examine into the state of agriculture, and to distribute the burden of taxation accordingly. They were in fact a sort of local commissioners for the assessment of the land-tax. Any surplus above the prescribed amount was to be expended on local improvements, and a portion of land in every township was set aside to provide a fund for the maintenance of public buildings, such as churches and baths. Any hospitality which the Muslims claimed of right from the Copts was to be taken into account (see History of the Caliphs by Al-Suyuti) While the Roman system of registration and of collection was partially continued, the taxation fixed under treaty by the Arabs was both less vexatious and less burdensome than that of the Romans. The treaty constituting under the first article a general security was given for the life, property, and churches of the Egyptians, who were also to be allowed the free exercise of their religion. For the payment of tribute and taxes constituted them a protected people ('ahl adh dhimmah',literally 'the people to whom one is bound to by honor of an agreement') with a status implying these privileges. The tribute was fixed at two dinârs per head for all except very old men and children, and the total tax was found to amount to 12m dinârs" Contrast that with the Al-Muqawqis, the last Byzantine prefect of Egypt who levied 20m dinars. That the early government of `Amr was animated by a spirit of justice and even sympathy for the subject population, can hardly be questioned. But this was not an isolated case, Wardan when ordered by the later Caliph Mu'awiah to increase the tribute levied on the Copts, he answered that it was impossible owing to the terms of the treaty. Al-Mawardi ( 364 - 450 H /974-1058 CE), a jurist says, `There is a dispute among jurists as to the amount of the jiziah. According to Abu Hanifah ( 80 - 150 H / 697-767CE) there are three different amounts: (1) from the rich are due forty-eight dirhems; (2) from the middle-class twenty-four; (3) from the poor twelve. These sums he gives as the maximum and the minimum, and he forbids governors to exercise their own discretion as to the amount.' It is impossible to read him without being struck by admiration for the extraordinary sense of justice and fairness which animates the theory and system of taxation he is describing: " Even when a protected people breaks its treaty by refusing payment of tribute, it is not lawful to kill them, or to rob them, or to take their children, so long as they abstain from violence such rebels, however, must be given a safe-conduct and quit the territory of Islam; and if they refuse to depart voluntarily, they must be ejected by force. '" There are texts from the 800's CE debating whether, if one for example were to take a log of wood that was not theirs, make a column out of it and have it as a foundation of a house, later the original owner of the column comes back and demands the log to be retrieved into his custody and refuse monetary compensation ought the judge comply, tear down the structure and give him the log or ought he enforce a monetary compensation. this was 1200 years. Property rights were taken that seriously, you could not simply handwave it and enforce a monetary compensation as that property in question was not attained by proper channels, hence it' s ownership and how much ought be the compensation for it is judicated by its owner and no one else has the right to, not the governor or even the caliph. Stephen Langton, the writer of the Magna Carta (12th century, contemporary with the crusades for a reason) studied in the university of Paris which archives show had plenty of Arabic treatises in its procession, there can be no question about it being inspired by the "Sharia". God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@@ΜιχάληςΠαπας-φ3π Well, there was an Islamic conquest, but not a religious one. For the most part of the beginning, most places conquered by Muslims had a 90%+ non-Muslim populations. It took centuries for people to become Muslim. Look at Indonesia, for example. No Islamic conquest there, yet it's the largest Muslim majority. Another thing to note, some of the oldest churches are found in Muslim majority lands (with exception to maybe ottomans. They messed up everyone, and tortured and killed Arab Muslims).
@@ΜιχάληςΠαπας-φ3π You're absolutely right but of course everybody wanted to defend his beliefs and incriminate others. It's human nature to think they are in the right, that they are virtuous and moral. In reality, nothing is black or white, everything in that grey area. Both religions done so much evil in the world that makes any student of history speechless but fools just won't understand, from both sides or any other side. That's why nationalism and religious radicalism always spill disasters for any country because it ignores history and brings only historic ideals and greatness into spot light which appeals to the idiots especially in the time of troubles and confusion.
@@f4wnz132 Actually in contrary to the common belief, Islam wasn't that popular especially in the levant and Egypt till about the crusades started. They had a good deal with every Muslim ruler to practice their religion in peace in return of taxes and no revolts and it worked. So crusades played a major role in breaking that deal and made people convert in mass and played a crucial role in the islamization of the region as the region radicalized and Christianity was now viewed as a threat. It was a very bad move by the Catholics and even weakened the Byzantines. Just as much as planting Israel in the Middle east is also a very bad move that would spill disasters for years if not corrected peacefully and will have a very bloody and violent end.
I believe the Israelis are hated for their settler colonialism. They might be mizrahi Jews but are they from Palestine? If anything is well documented the kurd migrating west wards is almost equal in time length as early settlers in Palestine. But the Arab kurd or Turk kurd rift is there irrespective of them having similar religions that's Sunni islam
Look up Nakbah. If that's how israel started, with massacres such as dier yassin, and tantura and many others, not to mention the displacement of almost a million people. With continued oppression and massacres to this day, how do you expect them to be loved?
@@PIOVRAME Let me guess... You are going to call a bunch of riots "pogroms." It's very Amsterdam, if you catch my drift. Either way, trouble started when European Jews forced themselves into Palestine. Need I remind you what the Ergun was classified as by the British? The very same group that later became the IDF?
Modern Egyptians have no link whatsoever to ancient Egyptians. They are an Arab people, who speak arabic, and predominantly worship Allah. The Quran speaks out against the Pharaohs and ancient Egypt, and it has been seen as an aristocratic slave state by most scholars in the muslim world. Compare it to Mexico, a land conquered by Spaniards, who intermixed with the peoples around 400 years ago. They have, since the beginning, integrated Mesoamerican culture into the new Spanish world order they were building. It was always obvious to them that they had a cultural link to the people who came before them in that region. Egyptian history has been typically supressed under Islam in Egypt, and only in 2020, has the government started to embrace Egyptian identity once again. Even if the majority of modern Egyptians have more ancestral links to Arabia than they do Egypt itself, Egyptian culture "as opposed to Arab culture" is finally being shown front and centre, even if it is a bit fake. Modern Coptics should be "credited" as the true modern descendants of the ancient Egyptians, at least culturally. The copts have maintained a linguistic link to Egyptian for thousands of years, unlike the Arabs who sought to erase it. In China, the Han Chinese have been slowly but surely erasing and "simplifying" all the other Chinese ethnicities and cultural groups. Eventually, the only people wearing Uyghur dress will be Han Chinese at Halloween parties. This is what modern Egypt is. An Arab, putting on a halloween costume, and trying to convince you of some dumbed down and convenient version of a history of a people that they stole.
Thank you for your effort in writing a long and detailed BS. DNA Testing shows that nowadays Egyptians are the closest to the ancient ones by comparison of DNA with Pharaoh Samples. The Egyptians are only arabized by choice. Because there was a time in history on which being an Arab was synonymous with being part of the best of the civilization at the time, culturally strong, scientifically advance, spiritually reinforced, etc... Arabs and Egyptians mixed along history. And it's @$&#$@$&@ hilarious that you give us Spanish examples which are closer to the Arabization, can you show me the ones of the flag in pfp hahahahahahaha, historically genociders lying on other commiting genocide, to whitewash themselves. Hilarious.
Did you pull that out of your behind? Genetic studies show the coptic ancestry of modern Egyptians as well the mixing with others. Also, Egypt is the first civil nation in the world. Race has no meaning there.
Coptic Christians are also remnants of Roman colonialism. The indigenous people are black people and they are our allies in the West to take revenge on whyti👱 colonialism
Sayed kotb influenced khoumaini and many more... what is this ignorant narrative. You are simply inventing things and adding them to historical facts. Do better research.
But they are not... By the way, if you want to look smart with neologisms, perhaps make sure you understand the meaning of the word you create. After all, Semitic refers to belonging to the Middle Eastern tribes. As such, both Arabic and Hebrew are Semitic languages. Your word is also inversely constructed, meaning that you say the gen pub in the USA is Middle Eastern of the loving kind... Oops 😂
@@lukearts2954 *_"Uh, aktually!"_* Congratulations, Redditor, you've shown everyone what you are. Go take a shower and restream _The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare,_ anything that'll save sane men your company.
@@lukearts2954 My brother in Christ, Philosemitic is literally an academic term, the Jewish equivalent of a term like Francophilic or Anglophilic. It literally has a wikipedia article man: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosemitism If you're going to be condescending and vitriolic to strangers on the internet over perceived grammar mistakes, you can at least make sure that you're actually correct.
Bilad Al Shams was a patchwork quilt of ethnicities Israel was just one of the them Hatay Mosul State Jabal Druze Assyria Levantine Armenia Yzidi territory etc were others that were crushed by the M.sl.m Brotherhood backed Sunni forces or Turkish 1z1amists trying to' re establish the Caliphate
Western nations are politically stable, we don't have to worry about coups, we are technologically superior, we value plurality. It really doesn't matter what middle easterners think about western nations. You either conduct business with us or not. Either is perfectly okay. I firmly believe that's the biggest problem that the West has, we conduct business with middle eastern nations.
I agree but then that’s when they seek to expand beyond their borders and they make it our problem. This happens every 50 or so years and these people still can’t figure their bs out
Get your head out from your own ass, many western nations are intentionally doing everything themselves to flip this into "oh uwu this chip on my shoulder" grow up an take some damn responsibility for your weaksause race.
*Why is the sky blue ?* *Why are boys & girls different ?* *Why are Turtles Green ?* ★ 【 *"Hey, Dad ! Why is the sky blue ? DAD ! Why is chocolate brown ? Hey Dad, Hey Dad ~ What makes boys & girls different ?* 】 ★ *Hopefully, my point is made ! I am a Canadian, but I feel the Aura & Spirit of this question and how it resonates within those from the Middle East ! It is like asking why China has the 'Century of humiliation' & Why the Chinese became upset at the prelude to the Opium wars !*
Sir, middle east can not survive without 'West'. It needs security ,infrastructure, technology,and oil/gas flowing out of desert land. Who do you think designed and built Burj Khalfa (an example) ?
@@Cam-nq8br religious dogma is a Christian thing, Not a Muslim one, also Islam is fundamentally different from Christianity in its structure, so there is no Pope or even equivalent of Pope in Islam to have dogma, ////
It's very hard to self reflect when your house is getting bombed. Do you also think the invasion of Iraq was due to a lack of self reflection? What a joke.
@@OscarDirlwood Talk properly. I am talking about Palestine, Iraq, Yemen, Syria, and Libya. Bombings, military interventions, coups, sanctions, and their aftermaths happening isn't the best time for self-reflection. I would rather focus on me and my family's safety.
@@OscarDirlwood What do you think the Iraqis should have done to self reflect after what happened in 2003? "Maybe I shouldn't have been born in a country which was falsely accused of having weapons of mass destruction."
I am pretty sure they : 'sure didn't like when the -Western- American Military Industrial Complex / *Team America - World Police* 'Moved' to the Middle-East' ! We were attacked by the *Ou-Sama* and thus we 'moved' to : • Afghanistan • Iraq • Iran • Libya [ Where we swam in the once rulers swimming pool after inflicting *MIDIEVIL* levels of 'Boko Haram' on the dude pushing for a Middle-Eastern Gold Standard and ditching the *ALLMIGHTYPETROLEUMDOLLAR* .. WAIT HOE MANY IS THAT ? 4 ? 3 MORE COUNTRIES LEFT I THINK...
A british soldier who served in Iraq and Afghanistan said the following: "We went to the middle east, killed millions, then told the population that our way of life is better. Why are you surprised they immigrated?"
Prolly cause mixing religion and secular politics is a terrible idea cause the population thinks everyone is worthless unless within their religion. Edit: ANY religion causes that when wrapped tightly to politics. You get people who will gladly carry arms, blow themselves up, or cause chaos because Gawd told them to, honest! Cough, Israel I have love for you so I am going to request you please practice your religion with pride and happiness, so will mention, y'all prolly should figure out a way to keep it out of main government focus. ❤ Be well and like I would love to be, better and wiser each day.❤ I fail often but learn. God has something better than this system anyway, right?
Yes, my dear brothers, my beloved Palestine is the cradle of Christianity and Judaism, and it contains Al-Aqsa, the third holiest place for us Muslims in Palestine. Bethlehem, the cradle of Christ, is a blessed land, and it is the holy land, and it has been our land for tens of thousands of years, and it is the land of the Canaanite Arabs, the original Palestinian people, and they have lived in it since the Islamic conquest in the era. The Umayyad, Abbasid and Ottoman Arabs, Muslims, Christians and Jews are like brothers and neighbors under Palestinian rule to the owners of the land, but the Zionists came and the British occupation brought them to our land as compensation to the Jews for what they did to them Hitler. The question here is that who did the Holocaust, the Germans, why do I, the Palestinian Arab, pay the price? Why not Germany? Why do I, the Muslim, pay the price for crimes? Committed by the Germans and Nazi Europe, fascism is the root of all evil in the world. Our problem is the occupation🙏Palestine is an area of more than 27 thousand square kilometers and is on the borders of Egypt and Jordan, which historically is part of Palestine and the people of Jordan, more than 70 percent of whom are of Palestinian origin, but Britain made them a state and brought agents to the Jordanian ruling dynasty in order to rule Jordan and protect the occupation from the Jordanian-Palestinian people Palestine Its capital, Jerusalem, is the land of the Palestinian people for tens of thousands of years. It is the cradle of Christianity and Judaism, and it is the third holiest place for us Muslims. It is a land where most of God’s prophets lived, were born, and died. It is the holy and blessed land and the land of the Palestinian and Arab people. Muslims, Jews, and Christians lived there for thousands of years as neighbors and brothers before the Zionists occupied our land. Britain brought them in the Balfour Declaration to occupy our land. Those who committed the Holocaust against the Jews were the Germans and the West, not me.🙏🙏🙏القدس عربية اسلامية
no bro this guy is false muslims aint bad people so because they conquered and interfered in others hmmm ? everyone did it dont you realise dont you really realise ?? akkadians did it persians did it ancient egyptians did it so i hate them ? absolutly not so i hate rome which changed the world ? absolutly not see muslims or chirstians or pageans interfered in others i can say all of us are see how wrong you are pretty much wrong muslims didnt interfere much in life of other people on their early life just they pay jizyah and muslims too were frced t pay zakah and the poor whatever its muslim or not were given money to help them in their life see how wrong you are to became the hegomen of the world you must interfere and fight wars what ever the reasons
Nowadays, we don’t view the world with such clarity and do not oppose it as vehemently… we want to be westernized nowadays, whilst rejecting our own cultures…. Propaganda propagated with propensity…
@Chada-uNîzam-îCedîd This isn't a stereotype, statistics show that all middle eastern countries have much higher than average rates of inbreeding, although the country with the highest rates isn't in the middle east but is still a Muslim country: Pakistan.
Ok lsrael/ Jacob these peoples got to have some where to go. Y'all done foughted and these peoples got to have somewhere to live. USA is full up . God 🙏🙌 said let these peoples come home.
This is gonna sound heartless and cruel, but i am happy this happened due to both in the past and present times, When the Middle East power house was The Ottoman Empire was once a force to be reckoned with, plus The West of European and some middle eastern Christian Catholic and Jewish communities were threatened and vice versa with The Muslims conquests durning those times 900 - 1100, which The West responded with The Crusades to Combat it, and liberated Jerusalem. Why does this matter? It doesn't, kinda. Let me explain, those who are in power in the Middle east nations, the majority of them, not all of them. They don't believe in muslim faith of practice, instead they used it as a tool useful to help aid and build up their power of support. Its all about the money and control, and their very unique placement in the geographic on the world map, their religous ideology does not get along with other religions, and so there is only 1 way, you joined us, and believed and think what we do, so you can live, or you die. This video, or any of our best comments either from great insight or wisdom is from experience cannot probably describe how chaotic and unstable the Middle East is, and i don't blame them for it. The middle east to me seems like a very hard place to live in, beautiful landscapes, but its neighbors of other nations can easily lead to conflict and you have the West and East, USA and China and many other groups making it even more unstable.
The way this video represents the events leading to the ousting of the shah are so disjointed it often makes little sense when compared to the actual historical and factual timeline of events.
The sun 🌞 of Rational Intercommunication, Deep Wisedom, and Logic set in Morocco. After it, you enter the realm of gangs, excessive drunks, and twisted ideals.
@@cyclombAnd who paid the most for them? You are the one who's crying about it but it barley touched you compared to losses And destruction in Europe.
Another set of examples prior to the time period in this video: Iran declared neutrality in both world wars, but was invaded and occupied by the Allies both times anyway. The occupation during WW1 created a famine that killed millions. The resentment from those occupations is still present even 100 years later.
100 years later?? Honest to god, do you know how time works? Who is alive who occupied them or who can remember the occupation?
Millions of minorities people are currently occupied by Iranians. Azerbaijanis, kurds etc.
You can nurse your grievances or you can be a useful person in the world. Very rarly are both possible.
@@SkyGlitchGalaxy How are they "occupied"? Iran never expanded in the 20th century, they never conquered beyond their borders.
@@SkyGlitchGalaxyMy brother in Christ have you met the Irish? Nations have long memories
@@ElBandito Their borders were set without consent of many of the minority ethnicities within Iran. That's how. There are or have been many separatist movements within Iran, the Kurds, the Arabs, Balochis, Assyrians, Azeris, and probably others. All of Iran's borders throughout history were set by conquest until modern sovereign borders began to be internationally respected (or I should say, more respected) in the 20th century. Borders didn't just magically appear out of nowhere.
@@manchasdos a previous video in this series explained that there was honestly no good way draw borders in this region
Preventing war was pretty much impossible
Middle east ≠ islamic world ≠ arab world
Nope it's the Ottoman World
the fuck even is a middle east? it's called west Asia!
All countries in the middle east are Arabs countries except Turkey and Iran and All Arabs countries are Muslims countries
thank you
@@SD-mw7sc Iran was never part of that shit yet it's middle east
Many people in these comments for some reason do not seem to notice that this is part 20 out of 24, there have been 20 hour+ long episodes on this series...
Same reason why they are hated in other regions: Interference in buisness that is not their own
Indeed
Especially that profitable slave trade
they are not hated in the middle east. middle east loves them for the most part. they have to put on a show for their socialist brethren that america opposes so those arab ideas dont spread to other regions. you hate america and want others to hate them too
The West has intervened in the Middle East many times, colonized our countries and stolen our wealth, but when we practice the same, we become the ones who are wrong.
I knew I'd find a community of like minded people on this great channel
/10, /15, /21, /24. Will this series never end? 😂
Keep it up, Jabzy!
Dzięki za kolejną część!
@@utqiagvik1991 Oh hey funny seeing you here
Person: Why does the Middle East hate the West?
Isreal: Allow me to introduce myself.
Islamic caliphates: how ignorant
1400 years of hating Christians and Jews before Israel: no no, allow ME to introduce myself.
Very underrated and not know period of Arab history. Good job
Bro do something about these bots
Honestly bruh its crazy how many there are
At 11.00 he mentions bashir al saadawi, i am one of his relatives
Al saddawi helped the king just for the sake of keeping the state united
Then they sold him out.
Sad ending
Before Israel we had no enemies in the Middle East. Sick of giving away all my taxes to them
Lol egypt we had
@ bot?
Lol. Our first war was with them. They attacked our ships and enslaved the crew bc we weren’t Muslim.
Literally the first war the US ever fought was against the Muslims in north africa😂. You don't even know your own history
@@PIOVRAME and even you don't know your history morocco was one if not the first countrie to recognize the Us as a independent countrie and the Us oldest treaty called the treaty of friendship was between them and morocco.And gues what morocco is an Islamic country
It's because of already existing intolerance and hatred for new ideas and other religions + colonialism. Pre-european-colonialism islamic texts (including the Quran) already expressed hate and intolerance towards Christians, just like most Christians hated Muslims at the time. It's important to mention that this hate that spawned later on was not just due to European colonialism. In Lebanon, for example, the Ottomans ruled for more than 400 years and stole food, money, houses when there was a war, hundreds of thousands would die from hunger, disease, execution by the Ottomans....... The french ruled for about 23+ years, lied about giving Lebanon its independence after WW2, and cracked down on nationalists (including executing them), but they didn't steal any gold, diamonds, oil, gas, or anything of this sort (because Lebanon doesn't have any). Yes Lebanon's economic situation was very bad during WW2 but famines weren't as common or deadly as under the Ottomans. Not to mention, most of Lebanon's roads used today were build by the French (they also built a rail transport system that became defunct after the civil war, schools, libraries...). So french rule (in Lebanon specifically) was bad but not as bad as Ottoman rule, even though most Lebanese people have much more distrust for the French (especially among Muslims) than the Ottomans. And it's not like they forgot about what the ottomans did, every student is taught about it in history classes and Ottomans only gave up Lebanon in 1918, not a long time ago. I also think those feelings are because of a global movement that criticizes European-Western colonialism but doesn't mention other forms of colonialism/invasions that were just as brutal (including Ottoman, Russian, Persian...).
“Why do these people hate us?”
“You think it has something to do with the fact that we brutally oppressed and stole shit from them for countless years?”
“Nah that can’t be it there just stupid, that’s the issue!”
Maybe look back at history and understand what your favorite victims did for a thousand years.
You'd think they would hate the Turks then.
Who do you believe in the ME brutally oppressed by America?
And by “stole shit” I guess you mean underpaid for oil before OPEC.
Maybe it's because they're radicalized by their religion? Hmmmm
@@yaldabaoth2what’d the poor Jews do for a thousand yrs..?
Hey Jazby, do you know what's up with these comments? They're all quite strange. PS - What database(s) do you use for your sourcing? If you can let me know that'd be wonderful, otherwise, I completely understand.
It’s the history community. A lot of ignorant man children.
I think he bots comments on his videos to create engagement for the algorithm and that's why it looks like this but I'm just guessing and a look into his account on Twitter shows that he delves into Wikipedia pages and cites sources from people at the time and I guess he is an OG into internet researching for how long he has been doing this UA-cam thing even though he caught some flack in the past on Reddit but you can bet that his sources are somewhat trusted and mostly from Reddit, Wikipedia and research papers.
@A1un9ine I just wanted to know so I could look through them because this stuff is really interesting to me :D
@@garrettredding2837 Well, one citation he used here was for sure the wilson center report titled "Syria's 1956 Soviet request for military intervention" and read through that crazy description. You will go nuts.
Because the decline of the Muslim world largely coincides with the rise of European colonial empires.
Nah. It’s bc Their Religion is aso a political ideology of global conquest & it is so dominant and past of the culture.
Osama bin Ladin said the crusades were on-going and he attacked us, in part, bc we “stole” Spain from them.
😂
Thanks for this.
thanks for another video Jabzy - always enjoy your content, if you need a artist to illustrate any videos please hmu
THANK YOU, this video tells the truth about the Qajar dictator Mosaddegh, thank you dadash truly
>An help plead for Gaza just before the video
Ok, question answered. I'd hate the West too.
14:18 This is not entirely true.
Firstly, the place supposedly bombed was not the Turkish consulate; it was the house that Atatürk was born in.
Secondly, there was no actual bombing; what happened was government aligned newspapers ran stories that said that “Rumlar Atamızın evini bombaladılar!” (The Greeks have bombed the home of our Great Father!).
Menderes government was responsible for all these things, as well as the CIA lead “Tactical Mobilization Group” (later renamed to Special Warfare Departmant, the Turkish Branch of Gladio).
"communists were acheiving victories across the world including ... eastern europe" Yes being conquered by the soviet union after ww2 I suppose is a communist victory...
What is your source for the cia connection?
Is it because we divided them up after we agreed to make a deal with them? Man, we should have listened to Lawrence of Arabia.
No.
Whatever we would have done, they wouldn't be happy.
If we united them under a single Arabia? They'd have complained we didn't take religion and culture differences into consideration. If we divided it based on that? They'd complain we divided Arabs.
They have been free to change their own borders since they are independent. But they haven't, msotly. And in the cases they did, not a single time have they done it without a violent war.
Now what? If it were to be different, we should have just left them alone.
@@alfrancisbuada2591 they would have just fought among themselves as they did after WW1 lol. They're a tribal society. Civilisation building was beyond their comprehension
@OscarDirlwood Wait what?! You mean to tell me after we leave them alone they'll just fight it out?!
Tacitus, Annals: «Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, was given death penalty during the reign of Tiberius by one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and this most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judæa, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind».
Shaved monogamous pork-eating pagans tortured to death bearded radical Believers from the Middle East. For what? not for alleged controlled demolishions of two or more towers (which they highly suspected to be Nero's false flag operation), but for our "hatred against mankind".
It is true that we, believers, do "hate" deviant pagans, yet it is more disgust than emotional hate. And if you fear discrimination you can use old trick - pretend you are German, they were historically respected by Muslims.
And noone discriminated after becoming our brother or sister in Faith, whether it West or East
Excellent comment
Religion isn’t real.
Why they do? Not why the west hates the Middle East? I'm not sure how honest of a "historian" jabzy is. The question itself is set on a premise that would make an uninformed reader think the "Middle East" (a British misnomer, originally made for the Balkans) is actively invading the west. Which is strange, given that not a single country of theirs landed a single soldier or battalion, or declared a war over the past century.
Anyways, he begins the video out of context. He omitted the fact that all those supposed armies that were fighting the Zs were under the British Crown. None had training, or even half adequate weaponry. Not to mention, the other side, had weapon shipments from the Czechs that had recently arrived, in addition to the Crown's support and training beforehand (though there were divisions in the inside factions). But focusing on more contemporary issues.
The "Costs of War" study by brown in 2021 has these figures for the past 20 years of engagement of US policy: indirect deaths 4.5-4.7 million, direct 905-940,000 , in other words 6 million deaths and 38 million displaced. This is relevant because of the Oded Yinon Plan.
More on the Oded Yinon plan - According to the founding father of zionism, theodore hertzel, the area of the jewish state stretches from the brook of Egypt to the Euphrates; the promised land extends from the river of Egypt up to the Euphrates and includes parts of Syria and Lebanon; when viewed in the current context including the siege on Gaza the zionist plan for the middle east bears an intimate relationship to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the 2006 war in Lebanon, the 2011 war on Libya and Syria and the continued crisis in Iraq and Yemen, not to mention the political crisis in the kingdom of saudi Arabia.
In the 1980s an article written by a former senior official with the israeli foreign ministry in which israel shahak wrote a forward to which says "in my opinion the accurate and detailed plan of the present zionist regime of ariel sharon for the middle east which is based on the division of the whole area into small states and the dissolution of all the existing Arab states."
He mentions the Arab leaders which did in fact form strategy with the Nazis. This isn't done in bad faith. Only if you're used to dishonest media which paints hamas as a victim
Wikipedia Yinon Plan
He then proceeds to analyze the weaknesses of Arab countries, by citing what he perceives to be flaws in their national and social structures, concluding that Israel should aim to bring about the fragmentation of the Arab world into a mosaic of ethnic and confessional groupings. 'Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation,' he argued, would prove to be advantageous to Israel in the short term. He saw contemporary events in Lebanon as a foreshadowing of future developments overall throughout the Arab world. The upheavals would create a precedent for guiding Israeli short-term and long-term strategies. Specifically, he asserted that the immediate aim of policy should be the dissolution of the military capabilities of Arab states east of Israel, while the primary long-term goal should work towards the formation of unique areas defined in terms of ethnonational and religious identities.
@FarberBob678 most of the Arab countries wanted not the land but to wipe out Jews. That's pretty much the lingering issue which drove much of this. Egypt has moved on, maybe Palestine will get the message soon and retune the hostages to end this.
@@rockstar450 I'm not disagreeing
@@rockstar450 Many jews were already there in Syria-Palestina, they were actually fighting back the Zionist militias massacring villages.
Summary of the vid:
Egypt had main character syndrome then switched sides and became Israel's best friend and a "Blessing" for Israel (According to Benjamin Netanyahu himself)
Just the government. Egyptians don’t like Israel. They are however scared of it
@@PasteurizedLettuce
Egyptians are cowards just like Amru on of Al As, who took off his clothes in fear of Imam Ali PBUH
@@PasteurizedLettuce not really... they are just tired of caring for other Arabs. so they decided that they shouldn't even belong to them.
Technically speaking, Egypt and Israel are so ethnically related.
@@manofsteal5066 fuck no , there is no relation between Egyptians and European Jews, and they all hate you , they are just powerless because the government is dictatorship
@@manofsteal5066that's complete nonsense lol
The Egyptians do not hold the same views as the government.
The bots are going crazy
Aren't they what Israel calls humans?
@@barryirlandi4217 your a losers
@@barryirlandi4217 your a losers
@@barryirlandi4217 your losers😂😂😂
Finally a Chanel that speaks the truth!!
The answer is in the first second of the video.
😄
Cause ya invaded and killed a million+
The causalities of the Iraq conflict was mostly due to conflict between Iraqi militias and government not the US's initial invasion specifically
And this video talks about in general sudden anti western hate didn't emerge in the 2000s but has existed a while back including your lovely dictator Saddam Hussein who was the only one to not condemn 9/11
@@kiano4178who was talking about Iraq? The west has killed millions in the middle east outside of that and colonized their nations for decades
Citation needed
You mean the Ottoman Empire? Yeah they invaded Europe and North Africa and killed millions! What shameful actions those are, done by an ISLAMIC EMPIRE
@@kiano4178 why should he condemn, dawg,
Is your nation an attention begger
This could be a 10 hour long video
now do why the west should hate the middle east 😊 ≈600ad-≈1500ad
Why cut it off at 1500AD? Vienna was attacked in the late 1680s. The Barbary Corsairs captured ships in the English channel in the 18th century and sold the captives as slaves. Europeans and others were taken as slaves by the Barbary pirates as late as the 1850s. Algeria became a French colony because the French were determined to end piracy and slave raiding in the Mediterranean Sea.
@@thomasdevine867
and why start at 600 AD? Roman and Greek conquest of the Levant, the attempted crucifixion or Jesus Christ PBUH, the wars between Rome and Persia all predate Islam
1500? The "Costs of War" study by brown in 2021 has these figures for the past 20 years of engagement of US policy: indirect deaths 4.5-4.7 million, direct 905-940,000 , in other words 6 million deaths and 38 million displaced. This is relevant because of the Oded Yinon Plan.
@@thomasdevine867 oh no playing the victim again..
Budd you Christians killed more Christians than Muslims ever did
You enslaved more people than the opposite
You killed and butchered natives of the Americas, even their animals
World wars claimed more lives than any others in history
But cope harder lol
I mean all of this doesn't answer the question.
Messali Hadj, the father of Algerian revolutionary nationalism.
مصالي الحاج مكانش فرق بينو و بين محمود عباس
@@Mokdad-k8u حسبنا الله و نعم الوكيل فيك على تعمدك تشويهه بالباطل
Why tf Pakistan didn't adopt Arabic as their official language when it got separated from india (1947)as it was created for the Muslims
They claim arab descends , then why not adopted their masters language
Their history starts from arab conquests of sindh
They deny their hindu heritage then why choose (urdu) a language Which originated from Sanskrit
During partition 95% people of Pakistan don't spoke urdu
Urdu belongs to Indian Muslims
That's the one thing I don't understand till now
Invasions of Iraq, Syria, Vietnam, Libya. Etc
Bots read the title and came here in frenzy.
I've seen so many videos of this guy by now and they all follow the same framing tactics. Loaded questions as clickbait video titles frame the narrative perfectly, while he retells events happening over a whole world region, always implying that these procedures are unique to the middle east. Jabzy's video catalogue is the epitome of orientalist history revisionism, this is especially clear when you realize the dude can't even read any middle eastern language and thus has to rely on sources from outside of the region. Don't get me wrong, the infos he provides are correct as far as I know, but the narrative he is supplying doesn't necessarily follow from that - but from his framing.
Most of the info is just a chronological version of events. I just need titles for the individual episodes.
I wouldn't go as far as say they are "correct" from all the omissions that go against the narrative he is selling
Just on the previous episode for example he mentioned a plan to poison the water supply, this fantasy was one that was actually attempted , and they accused others of doing it. Operation Nakam.
@@ranro7371 Nakam was plotted by Lithuanians, in Germany... not in the realm of the Middle East.
What?
THE INTERFERENCE AND THE ISRAELI GENOCIDE IN PALESTINE.
Middle Eastern countries didn't like us before that, tho
@@MarianneKat good
NO!NOT BEFORE THE CREATION OF ISRAEL.....@@MarianneKat
From the Balfour declaration led by the head of ev* British the Balfour declaration @@MarianneKat
@@MarianneKat Because yall broke alot of promises and colonized them? The british lied about uniting the arabs and instead divided to their liking.
Well, the West gave the Middle East its name.. Nobody from that area called themselves Middle Eastern 😂😂
True. Middle East prior to last couple of centuries were India and north from there. The area was called "Near East."
Easiest rhetorical question of all time. Great vid as always. I wonder when this series will end? The comments will get really spicy by then. I’ll try to restrain myself.
Wdym end? He can keep doing videos on this doomed region for the next 5 years and just by then he might cover the history up until 1979 and after 1979's islamic revolution there is crazy events you might be flabbergasted with and then there is the history after 9/11 which by itself might take 5 years alone in the making. This region is doomed to repeat mistakes because they don't learn from the past so until they figure that out... expect more videos.
@ Their only mistake has been not all banding together to expel the Americans and Zionists, but thankfully they’re starting to figure that out. All jokes aside, he could spend several hours talking about the Lebanese Civil War alone, so point taken.
@@bogeaqYTThinking they can expel the Zionists and Americans 😂
Taliban alone stopped USA UK NATO Australia and Afghan government. USA already lost in Vietnam Afghanistan Somalia and Iraq.
no your a losers
no your losers
Christendom was always an empirial religion, born under the auspices of constantine, the subjects were converted at the edge of the sword and rendered into slaves for his majesty, often referring to him as their lord. In Islam such slavery is unthinkable. The only lordship is that of the creator, no station into which man was brought into the lands of Islam was to any degree as bad as the repugnant chattel slavery brought by the primitive tribalism inherent in their texts. Constantine chose regularly to refer to himself as the “servant of God” (famulus dei/therapon tou theou) in official writings. By the fifth century, this metaphor of subordination had been redeployed from theological to political contexts as the subjects of the emperor came to refer to themselves as “slaves of the emperor.” And by the sixth, Justinian insisted all his officials swear an oath that they would demonstrate their service to the emperor “with genuine slavehood” (gnesia douleia).b Building on Paul’s revalorization of the vocabulary of slavery, and particularly the word doulos came to be applied to a variety of hierarchical relationships, even as it also continued to be used specifically of chattel slaves. By the middle Byzantine period, this expansion of the semantic range of the root doul- eventually gave the abstract nominal form douleia, meaning laborer
Insofar as everyone who partook in labor was considered to be a participant This epistemological world view is coherent with master-slave dynamic relationship between the head of the state and his subjects, or rather slaves.
The word עוֹלֵל, ʿôlēl which means 'Babe, infant, little one, a suckling' occurs 21 King James Bible Verses Of these verses:
“Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.” -Psalm 137:9
“Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.”-1 Samuel 15:3
“Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.”-Hosea 13:16
The other verses are not much different. Infact it is always in association with violence. Indeed these verses are the reason why in the Crusades the sense of pious rejoicing at massacre does not appear to be the product of later theologizing; it is also found, in the account of the eye-witness Raymond of Aguilers:
“in the Temple and porch of Solomon, men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins. Indeed, it was a just and splendid judgment of God that this place should be filled with the blood of the unbelievers, since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies.” In fact, Raymond continues, “This day, I say, will be famous in all future ages, for it turned our labours and sorrows into joy and exultation; this day, I say, marks the justification of all Christianity, the humiliation of paganism, and the renewal of our faith.”
Another account by a chronicler and eyewitness-priest, Albert of Aachen, describes the killing of fleeing women, and depicts crusaders as::
“seizing [infants who were still suckling] by the soles of their feet from their mothers’ laps or their cradles…and dashing them against the walls or lintels of the doors and breaking their necks […] they were sparing absolutely no gentile of any age or kind.”The incoherence inherent in a stranger to Abraham calling the children of Abraham gentiles notwithstanding, this account evokes the very same Psalm 137:9 imprecation against Babylon, in Latin, “beatus qui tenebit et adlidet parvulos tuos ad petram.”
Albert describes a massacre occurring, in cold blood, on the second day following the conquest, painting a scene that is as horrific as it is realistic and detailed:
"Girls, women, matrons, tormented by fear of imminent death and horror-struck by the violent murder wrapped themselves around the Christians’ bodies in the hope to save their lives, even as the Christians were raving and venting their rage in murder of both sexes. Some threw themselves at their feet, begging them with pitiable weeping and wailing for their lives and safety. When children five or three years old saw the cruel fate of their mothers and fathers, of one accord they stepped up the weeping and pitiable clamour. But they were making these signals for pity and mercy in vain. For the Christians gave over their whole hearts to murder, so that not a suckling little male-child or female, not even an infant of one year would escape the hand of the murderer".
Evoking several of these verses in practice:
- (Num 31:17-18) Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
- (Deut 7:2, 9:3, Num 21) thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them...
- (Ezek 9:6) Slay utterly old [and] young both maids and little children and women: but come not near any man upon whom [is] mark begin at my sanctuary.
This is the polar opposite in the Quran in Surah Al-Tanwir, literally "The Englightenining" Surah, Aya 8-9, we have the death of a newborn is mentioned amongst the penultimate signs of the end of times, emphasizing the gravity of such an action. That child, now resurrected, is asked for what wrong doing was she murdered. This is to emphasize that she had done nothing wrong, for she had done nothing wrong and this is the day of retribution where those who omitted the evil are to be punished.
This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190, which exhorts to fight unbelievers and not be "Aggressors", in the commentary of what it means to be aggressors, this was stated Al-Hasan Al-Basri stated that transgression (indicated by the Ayah):
"includes mutilating the dead, theft (from the captured goods), killing women, children and old people who do not participate in warfare, killing priests and residents of houses of worship, burning down trees and killing animals without real benefit."
This is also the opinion of Ibn `Abbas, `Umar bin `Abdul-`Aziz, Muqatil bin Hayyan and others. Muslim recorded in his Sahih that Buraydah narrated that Allah's Messenger said: "Fight for the sake of Allah and fight those who disbelieve in Allah. Fight, but do not steal, commit treachery, mutilate, or kill a child, or those who reside in houses of worship."
It is reported in the Two Sahihs that Ibn `Umar said, "The Prophet forbade killing women and children."
بابتداء القتال أو بقتال من نهيتم عن قتاله من النساء والشيوخ والصبيان والذين بينكم وبينهم عهد أو بالمثلة أو بالمفاجأة من غير دعوة
"To kill those whom you were forbidden to from women, elderly, children and those whom betwixt you is a treaty or custom or by surprise or without cause"
-Tafsir Al-Zamakshari of the meaning of Aggressors in the Aya
More hadith from Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah:
حَدَّثَنَا حُمَيْدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ شَيْخٍ، مِنْ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ مَوْلَى لِبَنِي عَبْدِ الْأَشْهَلِ، عَنْ دَاوُدَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كَانَ إِذَا بَعَثَ جُيُوشَهُ قَالَ: «§لَا تَقْتُلُوا أَصْحَابَ الصَّوَامِعِ»
"Do not kill the dwellers of monasteries"
حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ فُضَيْلٍ، عَنْ جُوَيْبِرٍ، عَنِ الضَّحَّاكِ قَالَ: كَانَ «§يُنْهَى عَنْ قَتْلِ الْمَرْأَةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ»
سَعْدٍ قَالَ: «§نَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ قَتْلِ النِّسَاءِ وَالذُّرِّيَّةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ الَّذِي لَا حَرَاكَ بِهِ»
"The prophet forbids the killing of women, children, and the elderly"
This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Anfal Ayah 61 in which even oath breaking deniers/unbelievers are allowed to sue for peace states if the unbelievers they ask for peace, give it to them.
Stephen Langton, the writer of the Magna Carta (12th century, contemporary with the crusades for a reason) studied in the university of Paris which archives show had plenty of Arabic treatises in its procession, there can be no question about it being inspired by the "Sharia". both the renessiance and the european enlightenment were directly preceded by massive translation movements form Arabic (see the Republic of Letters by Alexander Bevilacqua, The House of Wisdom: How the Arabs Transformed Western Civilization By: Jonathan Lyons.
The modifiable testament testament commands indiscriminate killing, genocide, plunder, mutilation, enslavement, or torture of enemies, including women, on the other hand.Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190 limits war to those who fight against Muslims, prohibits transgression, and implies respect for human dignity and life Indeed it is what precedes the famous "sword verse", always cited out of context.
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
I'll argue that both religious are imperialist. Rashidun, Umayyad, Seljuk, Ayyubid, Ottoman and Mughal. All of these entities were Muslim yet they conquered people in the name of Islam, loot and conquest. Also, why did some Muslim countries criminalize slavery too late into the 1900's? I know that this might be contradictory to your beliefs but please accept that both of these faiths wanted slaves, especially the latter.
That argument would not be fruitful. Reason being how bloodless they were, indeed it is the rteason why the region still has so many creeds, unlike any other place in the world until the modern era. Indeed it's the reason why people make a big deal out of the jizya forgetting that for the last several centuries the romans extracted a far greater tax poll. The Muslims/Arabs were spread out far too thin to weather a local rebellion had it been as oppressive as apologists claim. Unlike the mongols who ruled a large spat of territory by eradicating the local populace while themselves being few in number, The Muslims were so few in numbers, especially compared to the urban settled populations conquered; That it was by just administration that they ruled the territories. The tribute under the commander who took Egypt, Amr ibn Alas for example was 12,000,000 dinars, Khaukianos, the last Byzantine prefect of Egypt levied 20,000,000 gold dinars.
To compare, in order to take Gaul Caesar eradicated an estimate of half the population, inaddition during Roman rule of Egypt, Egypt was not regarded as part of the roman territory but as an asset and personal property of the emperor himself, thereby providing for nearly 2 thirds of the roman treasury, on the other hand during Muslim Rule not only had the soldiers not been allowed to enter liberated cities, they were not allowed to buy land or settle either. In Egypt for example, the caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab restored the Coptic pope Benjamin I (622-661) to his seat after he had been in exile for 13 years under the Byzantine emperor Heraclius.
With regards to the conduct of the commander who took Egypt, Amr ibn Alas with the Coptic pope we have this accounts written by Severus of Ashmunein a coptic priest and historian:
"Then Amr turned to him, and said to him: "Resume the government of all your churches and of your people, and administer their affairs. And if you will pray for me, that I may go to the West and to Pentapolis, and take possession of them, as I have of Egypt, and return to you in safety and speedily, I will do for you all that you shall ask of me." Then the holy Benjamin prayed for Amr, and pronounced an eloquent discourse, which made Amr and those present with him marvel, and which contained words of exhortation and much profit for those that heard him; and he revealed certain matters to Amr, and departed from his presence honored and revered. And all that the blessed father said to the commander Amr, he found true, and not a letter of it was unfulfilled." -History of the Patriarchs of Alexandria
Amr, upon the request of the Caliph Umar, asked the Patriarch Benjamin what was the best way of keeping the country in order and raising the revenue. The conditions laid down by the Patriarch were these:
(1) that the taxes should be collected at the right time (the end of the agricultural season)
(2) that no taxes should be demanded after the vintage;
(3) that the canals should be dug out yearly;
(4) that the dykes and sluice-gates should be kept in repair;
(5) that no unjust or tyrannical official should be appointed.
The Chronicle of John, Bishop of Nikiu writes about Amr "And he exacted the taxes which had been determined upon, but he took none of the property of the Churches, and he committed no act of spoliation or plunder, and he preserved them throughout all his days.", He writes in a later section regarding the city of Alexandria and that its previous unjust governor Menas had the pol tax of the city to be 32,057 gold dinars while Amr deposed him for a person loved by the people that had been exiled by Heraclius named John and had it set at 22,000. Regarding the appointment he writes "Now he had been appointed prefect of the city of Alexandria when Amr entered it. And this John had compassion on the poor, and gave generously to them out of his possessions. And seeing their affliction he had mercy upon them, and wept over their lot. Amr deposed Menas and appointed John in his stead."
Ibn `Abd al Hakam (187 - 257 A.H/ 800-871 C.E ) writes that when `Amr was firmly established, he made the Copts pay a similar tribute to that exacted by the Romans, but it was to fluctuate in proportion to their wealth and prosperity. This can only mean that he continued the Roman system of land-tax: for the poll-tax imposed by the Arabs was a fixed payment, while undoubtedly the land-tax varied in accordance with the rise of the Nile and the general conditions of agriculture. Ibn `Abd al Hakam goes on to say that it was the duty of the village headmen to meet and examine into the state of agriculture, and to distribute the burden of taxation accordingly. They were in fact a sort of local commissioners for the assessment of the land-tax. Any surplus above the prescribed amount was to be expended on local improvements, and a portion of land in every township was set aside to provide a fund for the maintenance of public buildings, such as churches and baths. Any hospitality which the Muslims claimed of right from the Copts was to be taken into account (see History of the Caliphs by Al-Suyuti)
While the Roman system of registration and of collection was partially continued, the taxation fixed under treaty by the Arabs was both less vexatious and less burdensome than that of the Romans. The treaty constituting under the first article a general security was given for the life, property, and churches of the Egyptians, who were also to be allowed the free exercise of their religion. For the payment of tribute and taxes constituted them a protected people ('ahl adh dhimmah',literally 'the people to whom one is bound to by honor of an agreement') with a status implying these privileges. The tribute was fixed at two dinârs per head for all except very old men and children, and the total tax was found to amount to 12m dinârs" Contrast that with the Al-Muqawqis, the last Byzantine prefect of Egypt who levied 20m dinars.
That the early government of `Amr was animated by a spirit of justice and even sympathy for the subject population, can hardly be questioned. But this was not an isolated case, Wardan when ordered by the later Caliph Mu'awiah to increase the tribute levied on the Copts, he answered that it was impossible owing to the terms of the treaty.
Al-Mawardi ( 364 - 450 H /974-1058 CE), a jurist says, `There is a dispute among jurists as to the amount of the jiziah. According to Abu Hanifah ( 80 - 150 H / 697-767CE) there are three different amounts: (1) from the rich are due forty-eight dirhems; (2) from the middle-class twenty-four; (3) from the poor twelve. These sums he gives as the maximum and the minimum, and he forbids governors to exercise their own discretion as to the amount.' It is impossible to read him without being struck by admiration for the extraordinary sense of justice and fairness which animates the theory and system of taxation he is describing:
"
Even when a protected people breaks its treaty by refusing payment of tribute, it is not lawful to kill them, or to rob them, or to take their children,
so long as they abstain from violence such rebels, however, must be given a safe-conduct and quit the territory of Islam; and if they refuse to depart voluntarily, they must be ejected by force.
'"
There are texts from the 800's CE debating whether, if one for example were to take a log of wood that was not theirs, make a column out of it and have it as a foundation of a house, later the original owner of the column comes back and demands the log to be retrieved into his custody and refuse monetary compensation ought the judge comply, tear down the structure and give him the log or ought he enforce a monetary compensation. this was 1200 years. Property rights were taken that seriously, you could not simply handwave it and enforce a monetary compensation as that property in question was not attained by proper channels, hence it' s ownership and how much ought be the compensation for it is judicated by its owner and no one else has the right to, not the governor or even the caliph. Stephen Langton, the writer of the Magna Carta (12th century, contemporary with the crusades for a reason) studied in the university of Paris which archives show had plenty of Arabic treatises in its procession, there can be no question about it being inspired by the "Sharia".
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@@ΜιχάληςΠαπας-φ3π Well, there was an Islamic conquest, but not a religious one. For the most part of the beginning, most places conquered by Muslims had a 90%+ non-Muslim populations. It took centuries for people to become Muslim. Look at Indonesia, for example. No Islamic conquest there, yet it's the largest Muslim majority.
Another thing to note, some of the oldest churches are found in Muslim majority lands (with exception to maybe ottomans. They messed up everyone, and tortured and killed Arab Muslims).
@@ΜιχάληςΠαπας-φ3π You're absolutely right but of course everybody wanted to defend his beliefs and incriminate others. It's human nature to think they are in the right, that they are virtuous and moral.
In reality, nothing is black or white, everything in that grey area. Both religions done so much evil in the world that makes any student of history speechless but fools just won't understand, from both sides or any other side. That's why nationalism and religious radicalism always spill disasters for any country because it ignores history and brings only historic ideals and greatness into spot light which appeals to the idiots especially in the time of troubles and confusion.
@@f4wnz132 Actually in contrary to the common belief, Islam wasn't that popular especially in the levant and Egypt till about the crusades started. They had a good deal with every Muslim ruler to practice their religion in peace in return of taxes and no revolts and it worked. So crusades played a major role in breaking that deal and made people convert in mass and played a crucial role in the islamization of the region as the region radicalized and Christianity was now viewed as a threat. It was a very bad move by the Catholics and even weakened the Byzantines. Just as much as planting Israel in the Middle east is also a very bad move that would spill disasters for years if not corrected peacefully and will have a very bloody and violent end.
Is israel hated because it's Jewish or because it's western?
How does it work with israel being 64% Mizrahi Jewish and only 34% Ashkenazi European?
The Mizrahis aren't the ones who started it and they weren't the leaders either. They're just the drones of the Ashkenazis.
I believe the Israelis are hated for their settler colonialism. They might be mizrahi Jews but are they from Palestine?
If anything is well documented the kurd migrating west wards is almost equal in time length as early settlers in Palestine. But the Arab kurd or Turk kurd rift is there irrespective of them having similar religions that's Sunni islam
Look up Nakbah. If that's how israel started, with massacres such as dier yassin, and tantura and many others, not to mention the displacement of almost a million people. With continued oppression and massacres to this day, how do you expect them to be loved?
@@f4wnz132funny how you guys always start the story with the nakba and never talk about what happened in the 20s😬
@@PIOVRAME Let me guess... You are going to call a bunch of riots "pogroms." It's very Amsterdam, if you catch my drift.
Either way, trouble started when European Jews forced themselves into Palestine. Need I remind you what the Ergun was classified as by the British? The very same group that later became the IDF?
Modern Egyptians have no link whatsoever to ancient Egyptians. They are an Arab people, who speak arabic, and predominantly worship Allah. The Quran speaks out against the Pharaohs and ancient Egypt, and it has been seen as an aristocratic slave state by most scholars in the muslim world. Compare it to Mexico, a land conquered by Spaniards, who intermixed with the peoples around 400 years ago. They have, since the beginning, integrated Mesoamerican culture into the new Spanish world order they were building. It was always obvious to them that they had a cultural link to the people who came before them in that region. Egyptian history has been typically supressed under Islam in Egypt, and only in 2020, has the government started to embrace Egyptian identity once again. Even if the majority of modern Egyptians have more ancestral links to Arabia than they do Egypt itself, Egyptian culture "as opposed to Arab culture" is finally being shown front and centre, even if it is a bit fake.
Modern Coptics should be "credited" as the true modern descendants of the ancient Egyptians, at least culturally. The copts have maintained a linguistic link to Egyptian for thousands of years, unlike the Arabs who sought to erase it.
In China, the Han Chinese have been slowly but surely erasing and "simplifying" all the other Chinese ethnicities and cultural groups. Eventually, the only people wearing Uyghur dress will be Han Chinese at Halloween parties. This is what modern Egypt is. An Arab, putting on a halloween costume, and trying to convince you of some dumbed down and convenient version of a history of a people that they stole.
Where did Ancient Egyptians go?
Thank you for your effort in writing a long and detailed BS. DNA Testing shows that nowadays Egyptians are the closest to the ancient ones by comparison of DNA with Pharaoh Samples. The Egyptians are only arabized by choice. Because there was a time in history on which being an Arab was synonymous with being part of the best of the civilization at the time, culturally strong, scientifically advance, spiritually reinforced, etc... Arabs and Egyptians mixed along history. And it's @$&#$@$&@ hilarious that you give us Spanish examples which are closer to the Arabization, can you show me the ones of the flag in pfp hahahahahahaha, historically genociders lying on other commiting genocide, to whitewash themselves. Hilarious.
Did you pull that out of your behind? Genetic studies show the coptic ancestry of modern Egyptians as well the mixing with others. Also, Egypt is the first civil nation in the world. Race has no meaning there.
Modern Egyptians' genetic link to ancients is well documented in scientific studies.
Coptic Christians are also remnants of Roman colonialism. The indigenous people are black people and they are our allies in the West to take revenge on whyti👱 colonialism
Why? 😮
We're not fond of the middle east in the West either 😂
Sayed kotb influenced khoumaini and many more... what is this ignorant narrative. You are simply inventing things and adding them to historical facts. Do better research.
179 views in only 11 minutes? We have not peaked
We really need a history lesson on how the general public in the USA became so philo semitic.
*used to, not so much anymore
But they are not... By the way, if you want to look smart with neologisms, perhaps make sure you understand the meaning of the word you create. After all, Semitic refers to belonging to the Middle Eastern tribes. As such, both Arabic and Hebrew are Semitic languages. Your word is also inversely constructed, meaning that you say the gen pub in the USA is Middle Eastern of the loving kind... Oops 😂
@@lukearts2954 The Semites in the Middle East are a minority, the majority of the population belongs to the Hamites and japhetites.
@@lukearts2954
*_"Uh, aktually!"_*
Congratulations, Redditor, you've shown everyone what you are. Go take a shower and restream _The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare,_ anything that'll save sane men your company.
@@lukearts2954 My brother in Christ, Philosemitic is literally an academic term, the Jewish equivalent of a term like Francophilic or Anglophilic. It literally has a wikipedia article man: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosemitism If you're going to be condescending and vitriolic to strangers on the internet over perceived grammar mistakes, you can at least make sure that you're actually correct.
Israel,colonisation,atheism/social progressism
It wasn’t just the Venezuelans. It was actuallySaudi’s deal that they tried to copy
1:37
Wario Jumpscare
19:05 Vicente Fernandez
Bilad Al Shams was a patchwork quilt of ethnicities Israel was just one of the them Hatay Mosul State Jabal Druze Assyria Levantine Armenia Yzidi territory etc were others that were crushed by the M.sl.m Brotherhood backed Sunni forces or Turkish 1z1amists trying to' re establish the Caliphate
Jews.
"Deep thinker"
😑
33:46 thats the sultan of Oman, this guy isn't moroccan😂
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bc/Muhammad_V.jpg/1024px-Muhammad_V.jpg
Western nations are politically stable, we don't have to worry about coups, we are technologically superior, we value plurality. It really doesn't matter what middle easterners think about western nations. You either conduct business with us or not. Either is perfectly okay. I firmly believe that's the biggest problem that the West has, we conduct business with middle eastern nations.
I agree but then that’s when they seek to expand beyond their borders and they make it our problem. This happens every 50 or so years and these people still can’t figure their bs out
Absolutely correct!
We give respect to those barbaric countries by dealing with them and that gives them tenuous international bona fides
Get your head out from your own ass, many western nations are intentionally doing everything themselves to flip this into "oh uwu this chip on my shoulder" grow up an take some damn responsibility for your weaksause race.
@@CantHandleThisCanYa your countries cant even give enough births to sustain itself
dont get too confident
"We Don't have coup" , but you have demonstrations everyday 🤣🤣
Next four videos 1956 -1967, 1967- 1979 ,1979- 2001, 2001 - present
*Why is the sky blue ?*
*Why are boys & girls different ?*
*Why are Turtles Green ?*
★ 【 *"Hey, Dad ! Why is the sky blue ? DAD ! Why is chocolate brown ? Hey Dad, Hey Dad ~ What makes boys & girls different ?* 】 ★
*Hopefully, my point is made ! I am a Canadian, but I feel the Aura & Spirit of this question and how it resonates within those from the Middle East ! It is like asking why China has the 'Century of humiliation' & Why the Chinese became upset at the prelude to the Opium wars !*
Sir, middle east can not survive without 'West'.
It needs security ,infrastructure, technology,and oil/gas flowing out of desert land.
Who do you think designed and built Burj Khalfa (an example) ?
West represented for U.S lol maybe is a recent west country west born in Greece 3.000 years ago
What a fucked up title.... the title shohld be why the west cant act humanly?
Or why the Middle East hasn’t progressed past the Bronze Age yet and still lets religious dogma dictate its entire political system
@@Cam-nq8br religious dogma is a Christian thing,
Not a Muslim one, also Islam is fundamentally different from Christianity in its structure, so there is no Pope or even equivalent of Pope in Islam to have dogma, ////
@@Cam-nq8br Evangelical .. cough
Sorry but who does public decapitations?
Oh right, Muslim Saudi Arabia
_check yourself, foolish apologist_
If you act like animals you can't expect humane treatment
Its also easier to blame all your problems on them than self reflect
Lesson 1 of how to control a population.
It's very hard to self reflect when your house is getting bombed. Do you also think the invasion of Iraq was due to a lack of self reflection? What a joke.
@BilalBilal-xc5mc lmao are you trying to suggest they've been bombed since independence?
@@OscarDirlwood Talk properly. I am talking about Palestine, Iraq, Yemen, Syria, and Libya. Bombings, military interventions, coups, sanctions, and their aftermaths happening isn't the best time for self-reflection. I would rather focus on me and my family's safety.
@@OscarDirlwood What do you think the Iraqis should have done to self reflect after what happened in 2003? "Maybe I shouldn't have been born in a country which was falsely accused of having weapons of mass destruction."
They sure like to move to the west and I wish they wouldn’t
I am pretty sure they :
'sure didn't like when the -Western- American Military Industrial Complex / *Team America - World Police* 'Moved' to the Middle-East' !
We were attacked by the *Ou-Sama* and thus we 'moved' to :
• Afghanistan • Iraq • Iran • Libya [ Where we swam in the once rulers swimming pool after inflicting *MIDIEVIL* levels of 'Boko Haram' on the dude pushing for a Middle-Eastern Gold Standard and ditching the *ALLMIGHTYPETROLEUMDOLLAR* .. WAIT HOE MANY IS THAT ? 4 ? 3 MORE COUNTRIES LEFT I THINK...
Your nation also like to move in ME, and i wish it wouldn't,
A british soldier who served in Iraq and Afghanistan said the following: "We went to the middle east, killed millions, then told the population that our way of life is better. Why are you surprised they immigrated?"
@@lotcam4046Fix your rubble and people wouldn’t want to leave that’s how simple it is
@@Cam-nq8br boy, I am talking about NATO, ////
Prolly cause mixing religion and secular politics is a terrible idea cause the population thinks everyone is worthless unless within their religion.
Edit: ANY religion causes that when wrapped tightly to politics. You get people who will gladly carry arms, blow themselves up, or cause chaos because Gawd told them to, honest! Cough, Israel I have love for you so I am going to request you please practice your religion with pride and happiness, so will mention, y'all prolly should figure out a way to keep it out of main government focus. ❤ Be well and like I would love to be, better and wiser each day.❤ I fail often but learn. God has something better than this system anyway, right?
Rubbish.. Greed causes war
They might hate the west , but they do love their cars
Wat cars most cars are mostly from Japan
toyota baby
West car is not reliable. And it's overpriced
We usually love Toyota, Western cars are not that loved here
...racism.
Yes, my dear brothers, my beloved Palestine is the cradle of Christianity and Judaism, and it contains Al-Aqsa, the third holiest place for us Muslims in Palestine. Bethlehem, the cradle of Christ, is a blessed land, and it is the holy land, and it has been our land for tens of thousands of years, and it is the land of the Canaanite Arabs, the original Palestinian people, and they have lived in it since the Islamic conquest in the era. The Umayyad, Abbasid and Ottoman Arabs, Muslims, Christians and Jews are like brothers and neighbors under Palestinian rule to the owners of the land, but the Zionists came and the British occupation brought them to our land as compensation to the Jews for what they did to them Hitler. The question here is that who did the Holocaust, the Germans, why do I, the Palestinian Arab, pay the price? Why not Germany? Why do I, the Muslim, pay the price for crimes? Committed by the Germans and Nazi Europe, fascism is the root of all evil in the world. Our problem is the occupation🙏Palestine is an area of more than 27 thousand square kilometers and is on the borders of Egypt and Jordan, which historically is part of Palestine and the people of Jordan, more than 70 percent of whom are of Palestinian origin, but Britain made them a state and brought agents to the Jordanian ruling dynasty in order to rule Jordan and protect the occupation from the Jordanian-Palestinian people Palestine Its capital, Jerusalem, is the land of the Palestinian people for tens of thousands of years. It is the cradle of Christianity and Judaism, and it is the third holiest place for us Muslims. It is a land where most of God’s prophets lived, were born, and died. It is the holy and blessed land and the land of the Palestinian and Arab people. Muslims, Jews, and Christians lived there for thousands of years as neighbors and brothers before the Zionists occupied our land. Britain brought them in the Balfour Declaration to occupy our land. Those who committed the Holocaust against the Jews were the Germans and the West, not me.🙏🙏🙏القدس عربية اسلامية
The Muslims in the comments crying and playing the victim card is gold comedy😂
no bro this guy is false muslims aint bad people so because they conquered and interfered in others hmmm ? everyone did it dont you realise dont you really realise ?? akkadians did it persians did it ancient egyptians did it so i hate them ? absolutly not so i hate rome which changed the world ? absolutly not see muslims or chirstians or pageans interfered in others i can say all of us are see how wrong you are pretty much wrong muslims didnt interfere much in life of other people on their early life just they pay jizyah and muslims too were frced t pay zakah and the poor whatever its muslim or not were given money to help them in their life see how wrong you are to became the hegomen of the world you must interfere and fight wars what ever the reasons
I dare you to give me a good reason why islam is bad
@AbuBakrTariqAlSalaf your baby crying Muslim 😭😭😭👈🤣🤣🤣
@@editztrap sunan ibn mahaj 537, sahih al bukhari 6130.
@@PIOVRAME Aisha was mature when she was married, don’t be presentist
This is so very British narrative..
Also we viewed freemasonry as shady and a front for British colonialism for over 100+ years….
Nowadays, we don’t view the world with such clarity and do not oppose it as vehemently… we want to be westernized nowadays, whilst rejecting our own cultures…. Propaganda propagated with propensity…
Another one
the P in Islam stands for Peace
White bread is starting to become a minority, soon the price of invading Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. will be paid.
the I in your user stands for intelligence
The "H" in "Israel" stands for "Human(e)".
@@Mr.Ambrose_Dyer_Armitage_Esq. More like humans. They are quite rare in the Near East these days.
@@domca4617
I don't believe you understood the joke...
Egypt rahhhh, nasser shouldn't have said we are arab , coptic islamism is the best
coptic christians also deserve equality
you dont even speak coptic.
@@hishamalaker491but we all can, thanks to the Rosetta Stone. For only $12.99 you can subscribe for one month.
@@hishamalaker491That can change
Interesting
Because we don't marry our cousins.
Incest is haram considered very bad before noah ark Allah destroyed a nation because of this
Also where Even this stereotype comes from so funny 😂 isnt Westerns more open that kind of relation
@Chada-uNîzam-îCedîd This isn't a stereotype, statistics show that all middle eastern countries have much higher than average rates of inbreeding, although the country with the highest rates isn't in the middle east but is still a Muslim country: Pakistan.
@@DioTheGreatOne so what, thats none of you bussnes uncle sam
Ok lsrael/ Jacob these peoples got to have some where to go. Y'all done foughted and these peoples got to have somewhere to live. USA is full up . God 🙏🙌 said let these peoples come home.
we dont believe in your naked god
Florida isn't full...
Because (they) made us their enemies
Who is they?
@@Ileft468they're mentioned in the first few seconds actually
It's your narcissistic problem, not ours,
SPQR fell because of this, you are in the line,
@@Ileft468 Jews
just out of the blue? no reason? at all, we arabs are just rtards to hate the mighty glorious free westerner. right?
This is a competition of religions, always has been.
But it is not.. People of different religions live together everywhere.. It's greed and arrogance that causes war
Please change the thumbnail, it depicts Muslims as mad and angry for the people who do know any better ♥️ 🙏
This is gonna sound heartless and cruel, but i am happy this happened due to both in the past and present times, When the Middle East power house was The Ottoman Empire was once a force to be reckoned with, plus The West of European and some middle eastern Christian Catholic and Jewish communities were threatened and vice versa with The Muslims conquests durning those times 900 - 1100, which The West responded with The Crusades to Combat it, and liberated Jerusalem.
Why does this matter? It doesn't, kinda. Let me explain, those who are in power in the Middle east nations, the majority of them, not all of them. They don't believe in muslim faith of practice, instead they used it as a tool useful to help aid and build up their power of support.
Its all about the money and control, and their very unique placement in the geographic on the world map, their religous ideology does not get along with other religions, and so there is only 1 way, you joined us, and believed and think what we do, so you can live, or you die.
This video, or any of our best comments either from great insight or wisdom is from experience cannot probably describe how chaotic and unstable the Middle East is, and i don't blame them for it.
The middle east to me seems like a very hard place to live in, beautiful landscapes, but its neighbors of other nations can easily lead to conflict and you have the West and East, USA and China and many other groups making it even more unstable.
The way this video represents the events leading to the ousting of the shah are so disjointed it often makes little sense when compared to the actual historical and factual timeline of events.
The sun 🌞 of Rational Intercommunication, Deep Wisedom, and Logic set in Morocco. After it, you enter the realm of gangs, excessive drunks, and twisted ideals.
Tldr jews
The P in Islam stands for Peace.
That's why this keeps going on. There's only one side that worships the violence.
@@CantHandleThisCanYa Every accusation is a confession. Where did both World Wars start again?
@@cyclombAnd who paid the most for them? You are the one who's crying about it but it barley touched you compared to losses And destruction in Europe.
@@domca4617 who paid the most ? whats your argument
and yes good thing that it did affect us that much since its another pointless war
@@kingawesomes4320His argument is why you Arabs cry about the world wars as it largely affected and diminished Europe.