ILS Runway 31R JFK during NYC blizzard 2010

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 223

  • @jpsheffer
    @jpsheffer 11 років тому +60

    Love it how the approach lights just barely start to peek through the snow as you hear "approaching minimums."

  • @melissanovak7704
    @melissanovak7704 7 років тому +6

    Its like time stands still up there. I've flown many times and that's how it feels slow and time is no matter.

  • @weakbruteforce
    @weakbruteforce 6 років тому +4

    Gotta have nerves of steel not to get nervous landing in near white out conditions! Bravo to the pilots.

  • @MrKillroy26
    @MrKillroy26 7 років тому +9

    Holy shit I thought the runway ended where the tire tracks went left. Nicely done

  • @philipmarq
    @philipmarq 7 років тому +3

    Runway lights and minimums called out at same time. Quite thrilling to hear and see, especially if you are flying the bird.

  • @1970dashj
    @1970dashj 3 роки тому +1

    excellent job captain and crew in the cockpit

  • @mz5222
    @mz5222 6 років тому +9

    Holly crap, what a nice landing

  • @ExtremelyOCD
    @ExtremelyOCD 10 років тому +16

    Awesome. Somehow watching videos like this are reducing my fear to fly. In the hands of well trained, experienced professionals.

    • @juilescieg
      @juilescieg 6 років тому

      ExtremelyOCD , at leadt i hope that they are experienced and professionals

    • @lcfflc3887
      @lcfflc3887 Рік тому

      well, in the hands of well trained pilots, guess what, you don't always get what you wish for, just needed to be said.

  • @DimSum9685
    @DimSum9685 6 років тому +1

    If im correct. It sounds like an Embrarer 135 140 145 from American Eagle with the pilot saying the flight no 4421. I was an employee for the company around then but at LGA. All of the flights had 4 digit numbers starting with 4.

  • @KB4QAA
    @KB4QAA 7 років тому +1

    Gnarly. Nothing so satisfying as a well flown instrument approach to minimums.

  • @EoRdE6
    @EoRdE6 7 років тому +7

    I'm so impressed by technology here, the fact they manage to fly a plane around and into new York with zero visibility and have no worries about hitting buildings...

    • @lcfflc3887
      @lcfflc3887 Рік тому

      is called radar, the ATC has one.

    • @A380_central_usa_jfk_
      @A380_central_usa_jfk_ Рік тому

      Its called IRS internal Radar system

    • @dwaynesykes694
      @dwaynesykes694 Рік тому

      @@lcfflc3887 RADAR is not what enables this. It's a combination of VOR (VHF Omni-Direction Range) radio beacons and/or GPS that permit the plane to fly a standard terminal approach -- a surveyed route that ensures terrain and obstacle clearance -- that intercepts the ILS (instrument landing system) glideslope. The ILS uses some fancy radio frequency tricks to provide vertical and horizontal guidance all the way to the runway. At no point is RADAR involved, and planes lacking RADAR can and do fly ILS approaches. As for traffic separation, that's courtesy of the plane's own Mode C transponder which transmits position and altitude information to ATC's "radar" system.

    • @lcfflc3887
      @lcfflc3887 Рік тому

      @@dwaynesykes694 uhhh you see you got it all wrong, when I say radar it means even so the pilots can't see were other airplanes are the controller at the tower can, making sure they do not collide with other airplanes, as for the ILS guidance system well yeah that's is just to aline you with the runway and to get to the runway, that's what you do in and IFR situation you use the ILS system to navigate in to the airport and the runway, it's all on your nav screen display without looking at the airport at all through the windows, as for not crashing in to buildings like the poster asked, well they aren't actually flying through the buildings, only on final approach you'll actually get that low to the ground, plus onboard airliners you have Anti collision proximity alert that warns you of anything in front of you that you aren't going to be able to fly over it, like a mountain and it also works for anything else like big tall buildings, terrain mapping on display is also available.

  • @elliottgriffin5193
    @elliottgriffin5193 7 років тому +8

    good thing you guys had snow tires

  • @JCTiggs1
    @JCTiggs1 6 років тому +3

    Thank goodness for Otto Pilot!

  • @IrishDave
    @IrishDave 7 років тому +14

    ah that fresh snow at the end is kinda a mental mess.... cause you think runway is ending.

  • @RedOcktober
    @RedOcktober 10 років тому +61

    i would've gotten a lil nervous near the end of the rollout (2:30) when i saw all the tire marks heading left and i found myself venturing into that pristine snow, where no plane appears to have gone before :)
    who am i tryin to fool... i would've been nervous through out the entire approach :)
    thx for the great video...
    --Mike

    • @batchboy999
      @batchboy999 6 років тому

      "Where no plane has gone before", hahaha. Good one.
      BTW, what does one crew member say after system says twice "auto pilot"? I hear the "go to....." part but not the rest, did he say "manual"? Doesn't sound like it.

    • @miniena7774
      @miniena7774 6 років тому

      RedOcktober
      Oh shut up you wannabe.

  • @BenBrownAviation
    @BenBrownAviation 9 років тому +29

    With the bells at the end i reckon it was an embraer

    • @bobalobalie
      @bobalobalie 8 років тому +7

      Ben Brown LOL yup they are like old cars. They have to ring a bell or chime if you do just about anything.

    • @joannfoster4989
      @joannfoster4989 6 років тому

      BewareThe

  • @frequentairbusflyer8
    @frequentairbusflyer8 14 років тому

    @blakman7
    nope, from hearing the atc in other videos its a jetblue e190. (based on hearing the same guy's voice from the cockpit) ,you especially hear it in the canarsie app. vid

  • @clovis86
    @clovis86 13 років тому

    @frequentairbusflyer8 actually blakman was correct, in every video once they exit the runway their callsign is clearly "eagle or eagle flight", not jetblue.

  • @tomroggero
    @tomroggero 9 років тому

    Landing with Slush on the window! NICE! Thanks for sharing!!

  • @mikehunt1334
    @mikehunt1334 6 років тому +2

    Safer to be in the air during a snowstorm than driving on I-95

  • @Imrooot
    @Imrooot 9 років тому +89

    Where's John McClane? )

    • @super-etendard
      @super-etendard 8 років тому +4

      unfortunately, he's getting older and older..

    • @Orangino4u
      @Orangino4u 7 років тому +2

      Drinking his hot chocolate milk in his sofa !!

    • @emac5738
      @emac5738 7 років тому

      Sudo lol

    • @tb9489
      @tb9489 7 років тому +1

      God Damn, that's funny..

    • @oldiesmusic76
      @oldiesmusic76 6 років тому +1

      And his parking ticket!

  • @GTboy96
    @GTboy96 13 років тому

    Well that's NYC for you. When we have big blizzards, we take twice as long as Chicago to clean up because we don't have the proper equipment or slackers. Not to mention the blizzard we had on the last week of 2010

  • @topautos
    @topautos 7 років тому +2

    Hooray for reverse thrust ! :)

  • @tyreekmurillo4524
    @tyreekmurillo4524 10 років тому +3

    this is one hell if a pilot landing in that type of condition

    • @bryce1898
      @bryce1898 10 років тому +14

      Pilots do it all day kid

    • @kevinturner5149
      @kevinturner5149 9 років тому +6

      Snow Board Well, once or twice a month anyway. Except for last winter.

  • @Wigglesworthsaid
    @Wigglesworthsaid 7 років тому

    I hate flying in and even above snowstorms, they get so bad on the east coast and are always bumpy. No avoiding them unfortunately during the holidays but lately have lucked out, no snow during Christmas at least.

  • @juilescieg
    @juilescieg 6 років тому +1

    no vision, no vison, no vision, suddenly the landing field appears right in front of them.
    god blesscthe electronics in that cases. i would have already written my testament ^^

  • @GTboy96
    @GTboy96 12 років тому

    Great landing considering the conditions. I flew out of JFK for vaction just a day before this storm. So glad I got out on that flight

  • @KONAmustang50
    @KONAmustang50 7 років тому +1

    LOTS of runway still to go. Nice landing.

  • @09beegee
    @09beegee 10 років тому

    When to turn the wipers on, in a heavy precip situation as this was, is a judgement call. Viz was good throughout the landing sequence. On the ground, there's no windstream to deflect the precip away from the windscreen. Ya always gotta get to the gate.

  • @interstategar
    @interstategar 5 років тому

    I have seen this approach from the ground and there's low altitude turns involved to ilne up with the runway with little room for error.

  • @barbarairwin4369
    @barbarairwin4369 7 років тому +3

    Amazing landing ! Bless the Pilots !

  • @MrEastern021
    @MrEastern021 7 років тому +6

    would have been nice to know what aircraft they were in.........oh well

  • @vast634
    @vast634 2 роки тому

    Good showcase why having all those lights on the runway is so important.

  • @nvdwarriorLtc
    @nvdwarriorLtc 8 років тому +1

    Great video. Thanks for sharing it with us. It may be routine for you folks but it shows the geese in back what you guys do to earn your pay check. Now, if only you guys could hover.....

  • @horacefields736
    @horacefields736 2 роки тому

    This is where the instruments don't lie. If the instruments say you're on course, then you're on course.

  • @rileywoods6801
    @rileywoods6801 9 років тому +12

    Was this Category II ILS 31R? Very nice, got the visual right about 250 feet off the ground, well flown gentlemen!

    • @tomdick693
      @tomdick693 8 років тому +1

      +Riley Woods yes, the autopilot always does a perfect job.

    • @rileywoods6801
      @rileywoods6801 8 років тому +1

      Well, I bet if they hand flew the approach it would be just as perfect. Ha! Nice share.

    • @wiedehopf9068
      @wiedehopf9068 7 років тому +2

      Cat I has 200ft minima while Cat II has 100ft minima.
      Cat II needs a better approach lighting system than what 31R has.
      you can check the approach plates here:
      flightaware.com/resources/airport/KJFK/procedures

  • @pip12111
    @pip12111 8 років тому +2

    thats some triple crown IMC

  • @mikevonkleist6767
    @mikevonkleist6767 6 років тому

    The pilots' heart stops. Then he sees some reference and he must feel so relieved.

  • @alinalin-nq2cq
    @alinalin-nq2cq 5 років тому

    SUPERB....RESPECT!!!!!!! from ROMANIA

  • @kevindigo22
    @kevindigo22 6 років тому +5

    Pet peeve: when videos like this don't identify the type of aircraft.

  • @wakes_inc
    @wakes_inc 7 років тому +1

    I love how million dollar jets have windshield wipers off a car.

  • @extraglutenplz3758
    @extraglutenplz3758 8 років тому

    it always amazes me how harsh the ride is on the ground, I know planes aren't exactly designed to "drive" on the ground but damn it's a rough ride

  • @dualinput601
    @dualinput601 12 років тому +1

    do you like these challenging landings?

  • @rohan-ghosh
    @rohan-ghosh 6 років тому

    So the first flight to take off after the airport was shut down was tj4 Emirates 380 to Dubai. I was on that plane...it was insane scene in terminal 4.

  • @Winglet520
    @Winglet520 13 років тому

    @ellnegro There is almost always icing in cloud in the winter. How severe is the question.

  • @roehaus1
    @roehaus1 2 роки тому

    Amazing! Which aircraft?

  • @txav8tion
    @txav8tion 6 років тому

    Nice video! great landing

  • @frankgrimesification
    @frankgrimesification 8 років тому +19

    Sounds like they got some help from Otto Pilot.

    • @TonyP9279
      @TonyP9279 7 років тому +5

      LOL! I hope he didn't deflate!

    • @mach37
      @mach37 6 років тому

      So, the 'Otto Pilot' was flying?

  • @dfc99nyc
    @dfc99nyc 9 років тому

    Supposedly NYC Mayor Bloomberg's private jet was the last plane allowed to land during that blizzard.

  • @orangebetsy
    @orangebetsy 2 роки тому +1

    How does a plane not get into a skid in this?

  • @pblacklock
    @pblacklock 6 років тому +1

    Couldn’t make the same exit as everyone else? Just had to make a statement with some fresh ruts in the undisturbed snow, huh? Just teasing. Great vid and landing!

  • @ellnegro
    @ellnegro 13 років тому

    Now that is some ifr flying... Was there any concern for icing? Hats off...

  • @MrReviewerz
    @MrReviewerz 14 років тому

    Beautiful landing! I thought it was 737 but it wasn`t.

  • @tyreekmurillo4524
    @tyreekmurillo4524 10 років тому

    oh I remember that blizzard. i live just 2 miles from jfk

    • @bryce1898
      @bryce1898 10 років тому +3

      ...sure u do... there are alot of blizzards.. but u be like "hey! I recognize that piece of snow at 3:42!"

  • @jackiechiles270
    @jackiechiles270 9 років тому

    Great video.....

  • @Orangino4u
    @Orangino4u 7 років тому +3

    Merry Christmas 2017 !!

  • @bigd-1-channel514
    @bigd-1-channel514 9 років тому

    Great Video

  • @alkantenik
    @alkantenik 6 років тому +1

    Great Landing!

  • @mikehunt1334
    @mikehunt1334 6 років тому

    All that technology is nice to have.

  • @perezster
    @perezster 13 років тому

    Impressive, thanks for sharing.

  • @erkansamc2045
    @erkansamc2045 4 роки тому

    According to me it was a very dangerous landing..:)

  • @bigbrycm6
    @bigbrycm6 6 років тому +1

    Is it mandatory for pilots to be certified to fly in IMC as well as be instrument rated? I know some private pilots aren’t that fly cessnas and cirrus

    • @bmearnhardt
      @bmearnhardt 6 років тому

      Private pilots are not required. In fact there are limitations too how close to clouds you can fly in VFR. IMC Training is part of the Instrument rating. Its when you get the wear the big dorky hood that keeps you from seeing anything but inside the cockpit.

  • @jdanon203
    @jdanon203 5 років тому

    What happens to the lights in the pavement when they plow? Wouldn't they get ripped out?

  • @pbr2805
    @pbr2805 2 роки тому

    Whiper blades on kinda late?

  • @embrj1453
    @embrj1453 10 років тому

    f awesome, wonder why the wipers was not used...

    • @jeffhenley3809
      @jeffhenley3809 10 років тому

      The Captain landed the airplane, his wipers were on. The First Officer chose to leave his off until the taxi!!

    • @embrj1453
      @embrj1453 10 років тому

      jeff henley It makes sense, how can you tell?

    • @jeffhenley3809
      @jeffhenley3809 10 років тому

      Marcelo Delima Well, for one I heard wipers go on from the Captain side. Two, I believe the one filming probably wanted to make the visibility look more obscured to the camera to highlight the "blizzard" approach and landing. Some of the pilots I fly with on my trips do the same thing!!

    • @embrj1453
      @embrj1453 10 років тому

      It makes sense, tks

    • @jeffhenley3809
      @jeffhenley3809 10 років тому

      Marcelo Delima No problem my friend!!

  • @plsniper
    @plsniper 11 місяців тому

    Forgot the wipers. :)

  • @A08041988
    @A08041988 8 років тому +17

    I'm not in the field of aviation, but I still find it quite surprising a pilot was permitted to land on a runway in that condition in the first place.

    • @lolvks
      @lolvks 8 років тому +23

      You'd be surprised to know then that it can get a lot worse than this, and they're still allowed to attempt the landing.

    • @davidhoffman1278
      @davidhoffman1278 7 років тому +8

      A08041988, Eventually the fuel available is going to be unusable and the aircraft is going to come into contact with hard ground again. You can either have it with the engines running and pilots trying to land or you can have it with engines not running and pilots not trying to land.

    • @rhettscal
      @rhettscal 7 років тому +4

      What the common man doesn't know is what makes them the common man.

    • @Jdinrbfidndifofkdndjoflfndjdk
      @Jdinrbfidndifofkdndjoflfndjdk 7 років тому

      A08041988 it’s just a bit of snow. ;)

    • @bullwinklejmoos
      @bullwinklejmoos 6 років тому +1

      A08041988 ive landed in worse.

  • @c0r5e
    @c0r5e 8 років тому +1

    No vipers on dude?

  • @bensiegel5793
    @bensiegel5793 9 років тому

    Hi I'm with ABC News in Washington. Did you take this video?
    May we use your video in a piece for our evening news program, and for all partners and platforms? Thank you!

  • @robertburdick2998
    @robertburdick2998 2 роки тому

    Trusting your instruments

  • @user-microburst
    @user-microburst Місяць тому

    Wow. What was the runway condition code?

  • @mark031363
    @mark031363 10 років тому

    You would think they would have that de iced like a champ.Or have heated runways.

  • @marvinmarvin8478
    @marvinmarvin8478 4 роки тому +1

    Somebody call a PLOW!

  • @almermurillo9952
    @almermurillo9952 9 років тому

    what happen the runway full of snow so scary

  • @HaroldYWong
    @HaroldYWong 13 років тому

    balls of steel, or shall i say composite material

  • @rg46979
    @rg46979 7 років тому

    A real man would have flown this VFR.... lmao - damn, balls of steel up in this thing.

  • @davidredpath1389
    @davidredpath1389 10 років тому

    I have done many times. No problem!

  • @TheFlyingExperience
    @TheFlyingExperience 7 років тому

    would it be hard to control the plane in situations like this after touching down?

    • @axelsflightsimulation
      @axelsflightsimulation 6 років тому +1

      Depends, as long as you keep the autobrake on low or medium and don't steer hard, then no

  • @Thomashorsman
    @Thomashorsman 7 років тому +1

    What are the 3 markings on the bottom of the window?

  • @pbr2805
    @pbr2805 2 роки тому

    A piece of cake. Should have turned off runway sooner. Auto landing with ILS both CMD's on (auto pilot).

  • @PointyTailofSatan
    @PointyTailofSatan 6 років тому

    Why didn't they use a CAT III runway?

    • @wiedehopf9068
      @wiedehopf9068 6 років тому

      Wind for example. 31 direction at JFK does not have CAT III or even CAT II. Also 22L/R are not as long as 31R.
      And anyway with that visibility you don't need CAT III.

  • @monolito
    @monolito 8 років тому

    slick landing

  • @woahspaghetti6069
    @woahspaghetti6069 7 років тому

    Is that the ERJ145?

  • @JIMJAMSC
    @JIMJAMSC 7 років тому

    I would be afraid to go outside on that day much less fly and land in it.

  • @jeffbridgman
    @jeffbridgman 9 років тому +1

    What type of aircraft is this?

  • @heyitsvos
    @heyitsvos 8 років тому

    So being as they extended into virgin snow, was the landing long or hot?

    • @sighahnyde2215
      @sighahnyde2215 8 років тому +1

      probably poor braking action in the slush.

  • @user-xy1xi3hd8f
    @user-xy1xi3hd8f 6 років тому

    What's the aircraft here....?? Thanks if anyone can reply :)

  • @mehmetokay7073
    @mehmetokay7073 2 роки тому

    Fast and high. Late touchdown.

  • @miguellahozgarcia3464
    @miguellahozgarcia3464 8 років тому +2

    Maybe anti-ice on? xD

  • @michaelsabella5924
    @michaelsabella5924 8 років тому +2

    how bout some windshield wipers pls :) - the pilot was prob texting while the plane was being landed by my auto

    • @MrBurndonesinkchair
      @MrBurndonesinkchair 8 років тому +9

      michael sabella Above a certain speed, wipers just accumulate snow & ice, making them useless. At their speed, snow melting on impact to the glass, the wipers would've just spread slush across W/S, reducing visibility to nil. Heated W/S doing quite well for this weather. & Thank God(dess) for runway lights.

  • @confrontation4741
    @confrontation4741 Рік тому

    Autoland?

  • @lauragadille3384
    @lauragadille3384 4 роки тому

    Now we get to drive in this shit as the passengers leave the airport

  • @harrymallory7963
    @harrymallory7963 8 років тому

    Ha ha!
    "Approaching minimums..."

    • @CrazyForCooCooPuffs
      @CrazyForCooCooPuffs 8 років тому +3

      ?

    • @gasaholic47
      @gasaholic47 7 років тому +1

      Do you even know what that means?

    • @harrymallory7963
      @harrymallory7963 7 років тому +1

      Quote: " "Approaching Minimums" you are about at your minimum descent altitude (MDA) or decision altitude (DA). "Minimums" means you've arrived at that altitude. Pilots use those phrases to alert the pilot flying when he us getting close to the ground."

  • @thomascallahan878
    @thomascallahan878 9 років тому

    Nice one!

  • @anlacky
    @anlacky 11 років тому +1

    very soft land..

  • @craigeagle9209
    @craigeagle9209 7 років тому

    if that was London Heathrow it would be shut!

  • @ianinvan
    @ianinvan 8 років тому +4

    One word ... insane!

  • @jasonrolle2168
    @jasonrolle2168 7 років тому

    wow great job.

  • @someone-nk6jv
    @someone-nk6jv 7 років тому

    Did the pilot take control at 200 feet above ground?

    • @bmearnhardt
      @bmearnhardt 6 років тому +1

      Yes. You can hear a "Autopilot, Autopilot" callout, meaning they deactivated autopilot.

    • @someone-nk6jv
      @someone-nk6jv 6 років тому

      Brandon Earnhardt really?! Why?

    • @bmearnhardt
      @bmearnhardt 6 років тому +1

      Could be a lot of reasons. Not sure of the aircraft but pretty sure its an ERJ something. It might not have autoland but it most likely does. If not the ILS would have either kept them in the air or crashed them into the ground... The excessive rain and crosswind probably lead them to believe they would have better control. Also it looks like they flared longer than the autopilot would have. They must have been taking runway condition into account. The autopilot would have slammed it into the ground in those conditions not considering the conditions. They made the right choice I would say. The weather wasn't being random and the wind was consistent throughout. Contrary to popular belief, it is recommended for the pilot to land if the runway is in sight before 200'. If the pilot can't land it at that point because of weather there is no reason to believe the autoland could.

    • @someone-nk6jv
      @someone-nk6jv 6 років тому

      Brandon Earnhardt cool! Tx

    • @wiedehopf9068
      @wiedehopf9068 6 років тому

      There is not CAT III or even CAT II approach for 31R or 31L. Apart from that the wind does not look that gusty. Most autoland systems land the plane much more consistent than human pilots. It is recommended on some models if you need to land overweight if there are no avionics problems and the pilots are ok with it. The computers doing the autoland can combined with the radio altimeter very precisely control the sink rate and do a very smooth touchdown without floating.

  • @muzz1290
    @muzz1290 14 років тому

    what airline is this, and what type of plane?