THE WORST TANK EXPERIENCE!!!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 гру 2023
  • ¡Enjoy!
    ¡Subscribe!
    Twitch: / kirshenbaumplays
    Discord: / discord
    #WarThunder # #Tank
    Music By:
    @WhiteBatAudio
    Thumbnail By
    ItssLuBu
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 278

  • @zyppydaddy007
    @zyppydaddy007 5 місяців тому +46

    As a US main with over 5 years of experience on this game and a 3:1 K/D ratio with over 5000 kills with SEP I 💯 % certified this to be the true Abrams experience even in the hands of an experienced player is frustrating to play. More than 50% of deaths occurs due to your fake 120 acting like a 105 and you weak armor with over spalling. Honestly at this point is just an insult from Gaijin to US. The only tank to face Soviet equipment in tank to tank combat without a single loss in the 21st century is shit in game. Weights 64 plus ton but the 49 ton tank has more armor and survives more shots. It’s a joke, honestly you can’t take this game serious is a fucking insult..

    • @umesh01patel53
      @umesh01patel53 5 місяців тому +10

      Exactly making US top tier miserable. I can tell you for a fact having played US top tier for over 3 years and its been the same every update. We get fucked more and more.

    • @renorzeta
      @renorzeta 5 місяців тому

      maybe because it DU not Tungsten core.

    • @shoelace2739
      @shoelace2739 5 місяців тому +4

      @@renorzeta DU has an incendiary effect when penetrating armor. So it should have more damage than tungsten.

    • @mistahj8968
      @mistahj8968 5 місяців тому +1

      To be fair, T-90M isnt at its best in this game either, as in real life it has APS, that can shot down anti-tank missiles, while in WT it does not. So Gaijin fcked up there for a bit as well

    • @StandingHereI
      @StandingHereI 5 місяців тому

      Dude, why are you complaining? What is the thickness of the Abrams and t90m armor? When you find out, stop whining. Snail is already trying to resurrect US tanks by reducing kinetic damage, it's not her fault that you are a braindead

  • @umesh01patel53
    @umesh01patel53 5 місяців тому +26

    At this point, it is pretty obvious that Gaijin is playing really hard to push someone to leak classified Abrams documents. It is bound to happen and we have seen this happen before in purpose.

    • @crypticchris8812
      @crypticchris8812 5 місяців тому +1

      One it’s a smart move

    • @rouge7429
      @rouge7429 5 місяців тому +1

      The shit they need to know isnt even classified

  • @abrsam7630
    @abrsam7630 5 місяців тому +26

    they made the sep v2 explode like hell, and the turret pop more often than than Russian tanks, that's ridiculous, it doesn't happen on m1a2 sep or m1a2 or other abrams. Don't play this vehicle until they fix it

    • @stefo_elpro2883
      @stefo_elpro2883 5 місяців тому +9

      Don't play usa. As a USA main don't play their ground tech tree, it's full of bugs and bad vehicules, wich ones in real life are good, but the russian bias of gaijin don't let USA be one of the best nations in top tier

    • @knowahnosenothing4862
      @knowahnosenothing4862 5 місяців тому +1

      Spading choppers in PvE until they fix a few things.

    • @tylerlane4587
      @tylerlane4587 5 місяців тому

      ​@@knowahnosenothing4862same!

    • @waldek7772
      @waldek7772 5 місяців тому +1

      @@stefo_elpro2883 usa ground is actually really op at every br other than the very top tier, for example stryker and bradley at 10.0, the ipm1, original m1 abrams at 10.3 are all really good

    • @reinyfrost3753
      @reinyfrost3753 5 місяців тому +1

      @@waldek7772 The IPM1 / M1A1 used to be really busted at 10.3. They were good in 10.7. At 11.0,. they're fine, but now it faces T-90Ms, and STRV 112Bs like there's no tomorrow, and they both really suck against them. The Stryker is decent but honestly nothing special (especially because you can't utilize your crewless turret like the AGS can due to poor gun depression and tall stature). The 7.5s reload really brings it down too. The Bradley was really good at 9.3, but at 10.0, it's kinda gimicky. I would only say it's really good if it has somewhere to be hull-down in. Even then, the TOW-2Bs rarely one-shot, meaning you'd likely only get 6 kills at most. The TOW-2As might be more enticing to use, since at least they have a greater chance of one-shotting (from my experience).

  • @corybrown2197
    @corybrown2197 5 місяців тому +14

    I’m taking a break from warthunder specifically because of what they did.
    It was already extremely painful to play top tier US. Now it’s pretty much impossible to play.
    Even when my gun isn’t taken out it gets yellowed and misfires.
    People sneeze on these tanks and they become useless.
    And then everyone just gives you shit for being a US player.
    Ive played other countries before MFrs it’s not my skill it’s the goddamn tanks. Like I’m sorry gaijin cucks US so hard. I want to play my home nation it’s not my fault they don’t want us to be competitive.
    So on top of struggling to compete, and the shit take you constantly get, I just can’t keep playing it’s too toxic. And I’m not going to force myself to play other nations just to try to have fun.
    So yea I’ll be back whenever it’s fair to play.

    • @The74t
      @The74t 5 місяців тому

      So long as they have a Moscow office I wouldn't hold your breath

    • @corybrown2197
      @corybrown2197 5 місяців тому +3

      @@The74t I know It’s just a part of me that is frustrated that a gaming company is held back by either a government or their own bias based in propaganda from that government.
      The game could be more than just good it could be amazing. But it’s held back by all this bullshit.

    • @umesh01patel53
      @umesh01patel53 5 місяців тому

      I completely agree with you man, I have been playing US top tier for 3 years now and its been awful only. Literally being my home country I want it to be competitive as well but fkin Gaijin makes it so miserable to play US. It took me a year and a half to grind Israel and I grinded to top tier just for it to he same as playing US top tier, missing armor, rounds etc.
      I don’t even touch this game anymore because of this issue. Even mid tier sucks now which I use to main for Israel cuz top tier is garbage. I don’t wanna play other countries just because they’re better in game fuck that. I wanna play nations I like and have their tanks be as good if not better than their counter parts.

    • @nelsoncheng2674
      @nelsoncheng2674 5 місяців тому

      Good choice, I’m with you. Let’s fight back against gaijin together.

    • @StandingHereI
      @StandingHereI 5 місяців тому

      Досвидос😂

  • @saltysteel3996
    @saltysteel3996 5 місяців тому +2

    The world's strongest tank is a joke in this game.
    Gaijin will never allow War Thunder to be taken seriously.
    The whole game is a joke.

  • @Springfield_M1903
    @Springfield_M1903 5 місяців тому +16

    I recommend using another sight or reticle. By finding one on the workshop.. clears up a lot of the clutter and makes your shot a lot more accurate and less of a guessing game. A lot of those long range shots missed because the sight is too cluttered

    • @emortalelitegaming2667
      @emortalelitegaming2667 5 місяців тому

      any recommendations

    • @cubanspy1231
      @cubanspy1231 5 місяців тому +1

      among us reticle

    • @A.S.M.10
      @A.S.M.10 5 місяців тому

      the only time id say to keep the default aiming mark is when you dont have the Laser range finder, it can be hard to estimate the range with modern sights that dont have range markings on the graticule

    • @Springfield_M1903
      @Springfield_M1903 5 місяців тому

      I have been using this on all top tier MBTs. I test a lot of the others this one is the best for me and I highly recommend

  • @SovietUnion_
    @SovietUnion_ 5 місяців тому +5

    its bad for everyone rn. Kinetic damage is below the floor, nothing oneshots, and barrels simply dont break as a result of increase ricochet chance for no reason. yeah pretty broken rank6-8 rn

  • @Nothing-yq2gz
    @Nothing-yq2gz 5 місяців тому +6

    Haven't played top tier tanks in a long time(like 3 months) and today decided to start grinding the new Abrams. Played like 10 matches. Done. I'm not coming back to top tier US(and maybe top tier ground in general), it's absolutely unplayable.
    My shots either don't pen(mostly against the new Leo's and STRVs as well as Russian tanks) or pen and don't do shit bcuz of the spall liners and in that situation they just turn their turret like nothing happened and do some random ass shot and I'm done

  • @thestrain.
    @thestrain. 5 місяців тому +4

    When you say that abrams is bad, war thunder community will respond with "skill issue", but when you say that abrams is superior they will instantly defend russian vehicles lmao and say that they're better in *some* aspects

    • @blackgalaxy901
      @blackgalaxy901 5 місяців тому

      Two sides of the coin, as a "skill issue" player I just turn my brain off and enjoy the game, I'm pretty bad at it so there's no good or bad tech tree, just simply play and have fun. If they really want to be "realistic", the stream has more realistic games than WT.

  • @JonathanLuna472
    @JonathanLuna472 5 місяців тому +2

    Thanks for the amazing videos lately!!!

  • @No1harris_98
    @No1harris_98 5 місяців тому +1

    This video essentially sums up the USA top tier experience all together

  • @raizencore
    @raizencore 5 місяців тому +11

    Pretty sad that top tier US has been ruined and it's gonna take quite some time before it gets to somewhat normal, I think ground vehicle should get a br raise to 12.0 and even 12.3, that would help mitigate the problem a bit but squadron vehicles and premiums should stay where they are.

    • @zlounberg6958
      @zlounberg6958 5 місяців тому +1

      "ruined" is a bit of a stretch

    • @Lolski_924
      @Lolski_924 5 місяців тому +15

      @@zlounberg6958 no spall liner, incorrect armor/round for sepv2 and low level players buying the m1a1 click bait and aim players, plus the loudest vacuum sounding engine, i think its pretty bad

    • @zlounberg6958
      @zlounberg6958 5 місяців тому

      @@Lolski_924 spall liner is in works, armor values are not properly sourced, and the new round would hardly make any difference, it's still better than a lot of others

    • @ursensitiveinagayway4016
      @ursensitiveinagayway4016 5 місяців тому +4

      @zlounberg6958 the new round would hardly make any difference??? Do you even know what M829A3 is?! Gaijin literally won’t add it because they think it would be too op, just like amraams it won’t. The round is designed to not set off era with its uranium core and around 700-800mm of penetration. It will go through lower and frontal plate of any tank. Is that no difference? Going from unrealistic m829a2 that shatters and non pens to a real round.

    • @billybobj9988
      @billybobj9988 5 місяців тому

      @@ursensitiveinagayway4016 how do you not see that 800M is too much for the current state of game

  • @NahIdWin995
    @NahIdWin995 5 місяців тому +15

    i dont think adding spall liner would save this tank. I still think they should of added 12.0 and sticked abrams sepv2 11.7. Yh they should of added sepv3.

    • @teppygray4314
      @teppygray4314 5 місяців тому

      agreed like it’s insane how they added a new rank and still kept the br cap the same

    • @FloofyMinari
      @FloofyMinari 5 місяців тому

      Yup. Sep v2 should have been added ages ago especially if Gaijin wasn't actually going to improve its armor or dart in any way.

    • @Honoer
      @Honoer 5 місяців тому +2

      Sep v2 could be a 10.7 tank with the way it preforms compared to Russian magic armor and rounds

    • @leviathantsp
      @leviathantsp 5 місяців тому +2

      It doesn't really matter if they add the SEPv3 or the missing DU to the armor. The main issue with the Abrams is the awful turret design exposing the ring and cannon breach combo of weakspots, together with the super thin UFP. Afaik those areas were never upgraded nor had composites, so... in terms of armor I don't believe USA will ever shine again at top tier. It's all about Sweden and Russia right now.

    • @darkhammer2078
      @darkhammer2078 5 місяців тому

      @@leviathantspthe turret ring shure understandable but the m1a1 ha and aim has the same exact armor as all the m1a2 in game that’s simply wrong the ufp gets added armor every sep upgrade irl as well as the turret does especially from the m1ha to the sep v2 also you can throw in the fact that while it can use it the m1a2 never fielded m829a2 and standard with a3 don’t want the m1 do be crushingly op but it’s nerefed to be the 3 weakest tank in game behind the arete and arguably the leclerc wich tbh I’d say only the arete is worse imo

  • @Zosterias
    @Zosterias 5 місяців тому +3

    Even the challenger 2 with the spall liner buff, is more survivable lol

  • @tanksrdabomb4205
    @tanksrdabomb4205 5 місяців тому +3

    they nerfed the new Abrams side turret armor and gave none of the other Abrams spall liners. (Italy, Japan, France and Israel didn't get spall liners)

  • @DesertfoxSPQR
    @DesertfoxSPQR 5 місяців тому +3

    well, after update drops all Leos are stupidly survivable as was T-90M on Dev. Same soup when 2A6 was added. All we need to do is wait for shadow nerf.

    • @kenanmuhic8755
      @kenanmuhic8755 5 місяців тому

      bro would rather see leos getting nerfed then to see brams getting buffed, but doesnt mention bvm's unrealistic survivability

  • @MegaCornflake
    @MegaCornflake 5 місяців тому

    wow this looks like alot of fun and fun is why we play video games am i right )))

  • @manueldiz6754
    @manueldiz6754 5 місяців тому +10

    They need to add DU inserts which if done right would make the lower plat inmune like the turret, and add m829a3.

    • @antares2767
      @antares2767 5 місяців тому +4

      Idk if it will make the lower plate immune even with DU inserts cuz the lower plate armor composition is less than the turret and is less thick. At best, it'll probably make it immune to lesser rounds like 3BM42 and DM33.
      But yeah I totally agree that they should add M828A3

    • @luigidomenicopace1329
      @luigidomenicopace1329 5 місяців тому

      lower plate isnt even the true weakspot...most of the time you only kill driver and engine...the worst part of the abrams is the gigantic neck

    • @manueldiz6754
      @manueldiz6754 5 місяців тому +1

      @@antares2767 I mean nobody really knows cuss they haven’t tested it in real
      Life, but I have a hard time believing Russian rounds can penetrate the lower plate of Abrams, especially the later models. But again it’s anyone’s guess

    • @manueldiz6754
      @manueldiz6754 5 місяців тому +4

      @@luigidomenicopace1329 yes also true, the neck is retardarly big, not even that big in real life

    • @rmz9054
      @rmz9054 5 місяців тому

      ​@@manueldiz6754 swedes tested it when they evaluated the abrams

  • @milipedecentipede2005
    @milipedecentipede2005 5 місяців тому +2

    The abrams has a spall liner, idk why gaijin didnt add it. Also where's the APS and LWS for SEPv1 - SEPv4??

    • @The74t
      @The74t 5 місяців тому +3

      No credible non-Russian sources that aren't classified comrade ))))))))

    • @ThatGuyOrby
      @ThatGuyOrby 5 місяців тому

      ​@@The74t I mean even Russian sources estimate a Lower Glacis thickness of between 650-750mm KE protection but Gaijin says they're "unreliable" because "Russian sources couldn't be expected to accurately estimate the protection of a tank they've never captured" etc

  • @user-gu3de4sy7q
    @user-gu3de4sy7q 5 місяців тому

    It looks so hard,,, .
    I might not have to research American ground tech tree quickly.

  • @eternalsolitude8818
    @eternalsolitude8818 5 місяців тому

    4:15 just outrageous.

  • @ryanrautenberg6092
    @ryanrautenberg6092 5 місяців тому +3

    Its sad the m1a2 sep v2 has worse hull armor than a t72

    • @user-jc2in3cp3g
      @user-jc2in3cp3g 5 місяців тому +1

      Does it actually have worse hull armor than a t72a? 💀

    • @ICECAPPEDSKY
      @ICECAPPEDSKY 5 місяців тому

      @@user-jc2in3cp3gworse than the base T72B

    • @ryanrautenberg6092
      @ryanrautenberg6092 5 місяців тому

      @user-jc2in3cp3g just checked, the t72b (10.0) has 250mm more protection than the abrambs. The best round the Americans have can't even pen a t72 from the 80s

  • @cravinghibiscus7901
    @cravinghibiscus7901 5 місяців тому +1

    what are you using as ammo? Hot dog sausages?

  • @SCP--op2eq
    @SCP--op2eq 5 місяців тому

    tbh I might not play with my abrams anymore until things change for now im just gonna chill on mid tier

  • @infaCt1337
    @infaCt1337 5 місяців тому +2

    Thats exactly the reason I stopped playing Top Tier USA.
    The Weakbrams is one big and loud weakspot. Usual they should have depleted uranium armour protection, but gayjin said no. So I say no to USA aswell.

  • @SuiSideex
    @SuiSideex 5 місяців тому +1

    remember no russian bias and same exact protection are balanced and realistic.

  • @reddy_can
    @reddy_can 5 місяців тому +6

    they dont add 800mm hull armor cuz it will be so op so they add 360mm instead , at least they should add 800mm hull armor to sep v2 bro its a shitshow

    • @Cobalt-Opera
      @Cobalt-Opera 5 місяців тому

      800mm would mean a 80-100 ton tank 😅

    • @nigglewill1385
      @nigglewill1385 5 місяців тому +1

      @@Cobalt-Opera no, it would mean depleted uranium armor

    • @Cobalt-Opera
      @Cobalt-Opera 5 місяців тому

      @@nigglewill1385 You mean against chemical rounds? Because the Abrams LFP's best is 400mm+

    • @Iden_in_the_Rain
      @Iden_in_the_Rain 5 місяців тому

      @@Cobalt-Operano? Have you seen the documents people have provided in bug reports? The lowest values I saw if I remember correctly were like 650mm

    • @Cobalt-Opera
      @Cobalt-Opera 5 місяців тому +1

      @@Iden_in_the_Rain If it was 650mm then why can't it block Russian or Leopard rounds huh?
      the 650mm are against HEAT rounds not kinetic rounds

  • @Mr.Su-35Flanker-E
    @Mr.Su-35Flanker-E 5 місяців тому

    Bro was getting only one hit and die, and that why you would use the T-90M or Leo 7 or maybe something.

  • @no-life4438
    @no-life4438 5 місяців тому

    I think u should install some custom sights that eliminates the clutteriness of the original sights

    • @Mehmet-co6zj
      @Mehmet-co6zj 5 місяців тому

      Where can we

    • @no-life4438
      @no-life4438 5 місяців тому

      @@Mehmet-co6zj ua-cam.com/video/HOq2dyTy6j0/v-deo.htmlsi=yvn7LhUGNFttwCA1

  • @rafaelzigx
    @rafaelzigx 5 місяців тому +2

    This tank doesnt have its real armor. So its just a POS. Even challenger are better now since they received SL

  • @petercsendes849
    @petercsendes849 5 місяців тому +3

    Please do another France top tier video!

  • @randydhanraj1502
    @randydhanraj1502 5 місяців тому +1

    they should atleast give the m28a3 or a4 tired of grinding the same shells.

  • @chimera2802
    @chimera2802 5 місяців тому

    While im waiting for gaijin to do what they promised for the Abrams, the 8.3 lineup is pretty fun

    • @edwinortiz4421
      @edwinortiz4421 5 місяців тому

      What did they promised? review the armor? give spall liners from IPM1+? Phase out shells that weren't used on tanks? Give proper rounds for the timeline the tank/package upgrade was introduced?

    • @chimera2802
      @chimera2802 5 місяців тому

      @@edwinortiz4421 to clarify I was just talking about the armour, the rest of those things are relevant but already balanced in game
      But currently the Abrams is just unplayable because the armour is just shit, most top tier apfsds rounds can even pen some parts of the turret cheeks, it's really infuriating especially because the tanks that did not have problems with armour are the tanks that are getting armour upgrades

    • @edwinortiz4421
      @edwinortiz4421 5 місяців тому

      @@chimera2802 yeah I get it, sorry if it came out a little bit aggressive. Wasn’t my intention is just that the nation I spent the past year casually playing and grinding to finally make it to top tier and be shit pisses me off. So I educated myself on the small details and I can’t begin to fathom a company such as Gaijin can’t get this single thing right. I mean apply common sense and you’ll get half the tank right. But no They even nerfed the side turret armor below M1 Abrams from the early 80s lol.

  • @tylerkitchen476
    @tylerkitchen476 5 місяців тому

    At this point the rank 8 abrams are unplayable, no reason for the tusk 2 to be mandatory, no liner, no armor

  • @DartStebz
    @DartStebz 5 місяців тому +1

    no pointof playing the v2 until Gaijin fix the turret side armor (go into xray mode in hanger and compare it to v1) also its been acknowledged on the gaijin bug report that it and the v1 are missing its generational DU armor upgrade for hull and turret armor

  • @nelsoncheng2674
    @nelsoncheng2674 5 місяців тому

    1:35 is just how straight up blatantly OP Russian tanks are. A shot to the side and it does nothing to it while the Abram’s keeps getting one-shotted from the front.
    The video poster has another video about him playing T90M, and it really just shows how a same set of skill level can be reflected so differently on two massively unbalanced tanks.

    • @Advicesquad
      @Advicesquad 5 місяців тому

      I mean... the shot at 1:35 was pretty much under tracks, which would do fuck all no matter the tank you are shooting. but yes there is a russia bias in this game.

    • @StandingHereI
      @StandingHereI 5 місяців тому

      ​@@Advicesquadclassic john

  • @tjcundiff3904
    @tjcundiff3904 5 місяців тому

    i hope on day the make the Abrams comparable to others nations its sad how bad they are in compare

  • @sarodorethedragon9865
    @sarodorethedragon9865 5 місяців тому

    this is exactly the shit that made me stop playing tanks, it got F&*^ing old

  • @alifakbar500
    @alifakbar500 5 місяців тому

    lol those german main need better team mate rather than spall liner

  • @basic8744
    @basic8744 5 місяців тому

    Imagine what the v3 will be like

    • @iimstupid2281
      @iimstupid2281 5 місяців тому +3

      probably the exact same knowing gaijin

    • @jPlanerv2
      @jPlanerv2 5 місяців тому +1

      literally the same but heavier lmao

  • @jPlanerv2
    @jPlanerv2 5 місяців тому

    leo2 has just better Turret armor layout especially lower part cheeks, mantlent and frontsides of the turret, abrams is just paper in these areas so you cant even turret twitch as you can in leo2s

  • @mohdktln
    @mohdktln 5 місяців тому +2

    Ariete tankers just watching this and smiling..

  • @Home_Wheat
    @Home_Wheat 5 місяців тому

    Ariete AMV : 💀

  • @PonelyPonely
    @PonelyPonely 5 місяців тому

    ya all need to realize this game is made by gaijan a russian owned game the devs themselves said they grew up learning up russian history and their own weapons its obv the game will be full blown russian bias

  • @nerd101fantasyfreak
    @nerd101fantasyfreak 5 місяців тому +2

    I hate it when russian tanks ERA eat a APFSDS round. like that makes no sense what so ever.

  • @alexmutnov9168
    @alexmutnov9168 5 місяців тому

    👋👋👋👋👋

  • @ashtonleathery2272
    @ashtonleathery2272 5 місяців тому +1

    The abrams has been nerfed so much or power krept so much since it came out its not even funny. When the m1 came out it was so op and hard to kill, and it could pen anything. Survivable was amazing aswell. Now its shell barely spalls, can barely penetrate other top tier vehicles reliability, and is a one shot 70% of the time. Look at the armor in the armor analysis and frontally almkst the entire tank is penable besides the cheeks. Hstvl is all i play now, my goal is to play cas in rb bc its more fun than air rb, but i can never spawn a good loadout in an abrams anymore. Hstvl atleast can scout my way to full f16 or f15 loadout

    • @SuiSideex
      @SuiSideex 5 місяців тому +2

      hstvl is more survivable than abrams xD i love this retarte** ruski bias game xD

    • @ashtonleathery2272
      @ashtonleathery2272 5 місяців тому

      @@SuiSideex yea, no armor best armor. It's sad

  • @TheNaughtysheriff
    @TheNaughtysheriff 5 місяців тому

    I swear nobody holds w more than usa mains not even Russia

  • @devendoffing7004
    @devendoffing7004 5 місяців тому

    With all the issues with the in-game modeling for this thing, imagine playing it on console too. It’s not fun :/

  • @wack6692
    @wack6692 5 місяців тому

    Me when I play like shit and blame it on the vehicle (if it was in a Russian tank I would have lived)

  • @laaams
    @laaams 4 місяці тому

    Imagine 2 modern tanks that have almost 20 tons of difference and the lighter one still has better armor...💀💀 That's the T-80BVM vs Abrams Sep v2, either the Americans use copper as armor, or Gaijin devs are bastards.

  • @user-rg1xw2rk5j
    @user-rg1xw2rk5j 5 місяців тому

    Cant see damage in top tier after air superiority. So trash now.

  • @tassiocarlinhos2050
    @tassiocarlinhos2050 5 місяців тому

    Which is the best MBT in the update?

  • @adhx7506
    @adhx7506 5 місяців тому +1

    Sad cause actually every single Abrams would be better than every single T-series tank, but well, what can you do I guess.

    • @fuahrahn
      @fuahrahn 5 місяців тому +6

      Any proofs, weapon expert?

    • @NahIdWin995
      @NahIdWin995 5 місяців тому

      No not really.

    • @adhx7506
      @adhx7506 5 місяців тому +2

      @@fuahrahn First hurt russian I see - well technologically the Abrams is way more advanced.
      Just the optics alone make it a way more viable tank since the Abrams will be able to spot and shoot at the T-series tank before it even aknowledges its presence.

    • @bagofsunshine3916
      @bagofsunshine3916 5 місяців тому

      @@adhx7506 got any sources that show the Abrams has better optics?

    • @Tanker000
      @Tanker000 5 місяців тому +3

      Gen 1 M1 Abrams > T-72A
      Gen 1 M1 Abrams < T-80
      M1A1 Abrams < T-80B
      M1A2 Abrams > T-80BV
      M1A2 Sep Abrams > T-72B3
      M1A2 Sep Abrams < T-80BVM
      M1A2 SepV2 Abrams > T-80BVM
      M1A2 SepV2 Abrams = T90M (idk)
      M1A2 SepV3 Abrams > T90M

  • @L1B4NN1NHO
    @L1B4NN1NHO 5 місяців тому +47

    So many deaths caused by poor aim+exposing yourself way too much =/

    • @teppygray4314
      @teppygray4314 5 місяців тому +11

      ehhh idk about that

    • @FloofyMinari
      @FloofyMinari 5 місяців тому +38

      difference is that a Russian main could do the same and have better results.

    • @RhodesianSuperiority
      @RhodesianSuperiority 5 місяців тому +1

      @@FloofyMinariyea russians lolpenning everything and dont have to aim at all. Its such a fucking joke

    • @HarTmanN_erik
      @HarTmanN_erik 5 місяців тому +5

      you play mobile fps not war thunder so your opinion is invalid

    • @kirshenbaumPlays
      @kirshenbaumPlays  5 місяців тому +43

      That could be too, but I bet you if I were in the same position in the T90M the story would been different

  • @puwaGT
    @puwaGT 5 місяців тому +1

    Well, you shoot to fast that you didn't process where to shoot.

    • @edwinortiz4421
      @edwinortiz4421 5 місяців тому +1

      Try to process where to shoot and you die mate. Abrams is a driving death sentence if you try to spend more than 0.7sec to aim in a CQC . Even tier 4 rounds of 88/85mm can lol pen drivers hatch or bounce into the turret from UFP

  • @WujoPoland
    @WujoPoland 5 місяців тому

    I have a question, can you write the specifications of the computer you play on? 😊

  • @minust.686
    @minust.686 5 місяців тому +1

    only american top tier win rate is under 50%. less armor, biggest front weak spot, no side protection and huge hull and turret. with ka50 ka52 su25 spam and powerfull pantsir, all elements are sucks.
    M1A2 Same Exact Protection Version 2 with same gen 2 thermal and no spall liner
    haha😂😂😂

  • @tomaszrostek6498
    @tomaszrostek6498 5 місяців тому +1

    Like i said under one of your previous videos, abrams is trash. mainig usa anyway

  • @YouShallNotAskformyName
    @YouShallNotAskformyName 5 місяців тому

    The Abrams IS painfull Bad in this Game but ITS a russian companys so No surprise

  • @phonenamone6858
    @phonenamone6858 5 місяців тому

    Bro if you think the Abrams is bad, go play the challenger 2s....

  • @g09h
    @g09h 5 місяців тому +1

    Could be worse, you could be playing Britain, Israel or Italy top tier

    • @nhanvu1654
      @nhanvu1654 4 місяці тому

      At least in those countries you can get carried by whichever Big 3 nation is on your team. But when it’s the US, guaranteed L unless the other team is literally brain dead

  • @carlossagastume3755
    @carlossagastume3755 5 місяців тому

    I agree the abrams today is one of the worst tank on top tier, but you in that clips u play so bad too.

  • @Tex2dj
    @Tex2dj 5 місяців тому

    cuz no USA bias , that is why!

  • @diddykong7354
    @diddykong7354 5 місяців тому +1

    american mains are just cas mains and thats the issue with top tier usa. they all rush to get as much sp as possible to spawn their jets and helis and when they fail a lot they just quit and you have no backup.

    • @edwinortiz4421
      @edwinortiz4421 5 місяців тому

      because u cant lol pen everything like other nations do to you, compete with what you have a semi advantage on. (HSTVL scout and reduce SP) Because the pantsir spam is very deadly as well. Not to mention Maverick now have like 30% chance to get eaten up by the roof ERA even tho they have 830mm pen. Oh yeah, Flakrak, Pantsir, Oto can intercept your bombs and AGMs. While adats just have a normal search and have to IRST everything.

  • @daxdert7620
    @daxdert7620 5 місяців тому

    abrams good only against T-55

  • @willowienal2957
    @willowienal2957 5 місяців тому

    bro you think the abrams is bad try playing the ariete burh

  • @ahmadutyakapeanutusa6135
    @ahmadutyakapeanutusa6135 5 місяців тому +1

    Driving in the middle of enemy line of sight doesn’t mean its a bad tank

    • @timothycantor4488
      @timothycantor4488 5 місяців тому

      The problem is how obvious it is players dont have the same concern in russian tanks. They just walk right out there most of the time

  • @wentor7730
    @wentor7730 5 місяців тому +2

    Нытик да и только. Танк вполне адекватный

    • @Optimusprime56241
      @Optimusprime56241 5 місяців тому +4

      It’s literally shit, sep v1 but worse, no point in grinding this tank

    • @Tanker000
      @Tanker000 5 місяців тому +4

      If Gaijin was NATO bias and gave T90M and T-80BVM Basic T90 and T-80 protection the Russian mains would be crying aswell

    • @wentor7730
      @wentor7730 5 місяців тому

      @@Tanker000 t90m worse than abrams. 6 sec > 7,1. Revrse - much better.gun Angles -10/+20 against -6/+13. The same as all ru tanks penetration zones. Abramses have much better survivability

    • @Cobalt-Opera
      @Cobalt-Opera 5 місяців тому +1

      ​@@wentor7730But still gets ammoracked by a stray T-90M 😅

    • @Kubulin24
      @Kubulin24 5 місяців тому

      @@wentor7730 Oh boy, RUssian, who believe the NATO survivability myth. It never existed and never will, because of magic nuke spalling of russian ammo.

  • @kimtongun3663
    @kimtongun3663 5 місяців тому

    Has anyone else stopped playing American ground because of the annoying commander woman, or is it just me?

    • @user-jc2in3cp3g
      @user-jc2in3cp3g 5 місяців тому

      I had forgotten about that 💀 glad I play Russia

  • @doctorgumballjlo4718
    @doctorgumballjlo4718 5 місяців тому

    S..S…Skill issue

  • @igao6265
    @igao6265 5 місяців тому +2

    skill issue

    • @thestrain.
      @thestrain. 5 місяців тому +1

      Cope more lmao Abrams is bad

  • @RenanSAbreu
    @RenanSAbreu 5 місяців тому +1

    murican mains when their vehicles aren't immune to death: 😭

    • @HOLYSHEET69
      @HOLYSHEET69 5 місяців тому

      Hahaha, very funni

    • @mattcooper6591
      @mattcooper6591 5 місяців тому +1

      U.S. has the world’s largest military budget in the world. The Abrams has been given better protection with each upgrade. The values in the game are the same as the original Abrams and do not reflect the true values. The weight of the vehicle has increased with each upgrade but gaijin says the armor stays the same. It’s common knowledge that the Abrams has DU inserts and spall lining for the hull and turret.

    • @StandingHereI
      @StandingHereI 5 місяців тому

      ​@@mattcooper6591Dude, why are you complaining? What is the thickness of the Abrams and t90m armor? When you find out, stop whining. Snail is already trying to resurrect US tanks by reducing kinetic damage, it's not her fault that you are a braindead

  • @Proxima928
    @Proxima928 5 місяців тому

    gaybrams lol

  • @Clonter1458
    @Clonter1458 5 місяців тому +1

    The tank is not even bad, you just played really awful.

    • @ursensitiveinagayway4016
      @ursensitiveinagayway4016 5 місяців тому +3

      @Clonter1458 yeah for sure it was because he was 100 percent bad and has a major skill issue, not like there are close to 50 people talking about how the sepv2 is bad has the same armor as a 10.3 m1 abrams. Like how is that possible the only difference is ARAT I and II, and even then in war thunder it creates even more spall when shot on the ARAT. The abrams should have its turret smaller, why is is so high so it shows the neck? Why if lfp not 650mm, why isn’t the DU inserts there, why not m829a3 which was sepv2 primary round it never used A2. I can keep going about how bad and nerfed it is. It’s why I can’t wait to buy 4 Russian premiums and get t90m and su27 within a little bit

    • @suctioncupman1607
      @suctioncupman1607 5 місяців тому

      "the copy paste tank with the same armor as a 10.3 and has been noticably nerfed into oblivion for years isn't bad. You're just a skill issue"
      - this fucktard

  • @dmitry8676
    @dmitry8676 5 місяців тому +1

    This is so low skilled player

    • @SCP--op2eq
      @SCP--op2eq 5 місяців тому +6

      tbh this is why people don't get along on war thunder your comment is the reason

    • @ICECAPPEDSKY
      @ICECAPPEDSKY 5 місяців тому +2

      Love to see your Abrams gameplay dude

    • @dmitry8676
      @dmitry8676 5 місяців тому +1

      @@SCP--op2eq whats point in my comment to be a reason that people dont get along with wt?

    • @SCP--op2eq
      @SCP--op2eq 5 місяців тому +1

      @@ICECAPPEDSKY its ight but sometimes i'm better on advance on the rhine with it or maginot line which are specialties

    • @SCP--op2eq
      @SCP--op2eq 5 місяців тому +1

      @@dmitry8676 im just joking and playing with you rn u good tho

  • @V6HD29
    @V6HD29 5 місяців тому

    literally a skill issue

  • @goldenking4460
    @goldenking4460 5 місяців тому

    This way I love war thunder 😂 I hate games that let’s America win😂

  • @user-qv6wx4dd2u
    @user-qv6wx4dd2u 5 місяців тому +1

    DO NOT RUSH WITH ABRAMS. they don t have enough armor to bounce any shells. stay back and snipe will better.... for now.. gaijin must place du armor to abrams.

    • @kirshenbaumPlays
      @kirshenbaumPlays  5 місяців тому +3

      The sad thing is most of the maps are close quarters so it’s rough, I don’t like to stay still and wait for someone to show