Call to action - If you would like to see the continuation of UA-cam channels like mine or others. PLEASE consider joining Patreon for further support. www.patreon.com/user?u=37396112
Hey mate. I am in no position to offer patron support at the moment. But I will support you with likes and comments until I can afford to help you out. I learn a lot from your content and appreciate the work you do to reduce feral animal populations. Cheers, mate.
Great spot for a review of a monocular! I’ve only been using thermal for 8 months it was a tippy toe in for me but what a game changer for the shooting I do! Double my take for the nights out & can scan large areas really quickly.
That wasn't the wind. It was my mate down the paddock slotting another boar with a subsonic 308win round. Cagy bugger with the reaction as I didn't hear a thing with his shot.
Great review as always, and also great seeing different animals. Glad you mentioned where you took the shots because I thought you had some real feral problems for a min. I am hoping you do a review of the XG35 soon.
Thanks Glenn, sorry I'm not doing a review on the XG35 at this stage. I did post a report on the device and a comparison with other thermals on my Patreon for Tier 3 & 4. You would find that beneficial to read if in the market 👌 www.patreon.com/user?u=37396112
I’ll probably never use one Nathan, but to me the video looks pretty good. Thanks for a different type of video and I’m sure that those who already or might in the future use thermal it’s very helpful info.
I love your vids no nonsense honest opinion and your not a bad shot neither 🤣 i run the accolade 2 but as you did started with the axion key and yeah im also a thermal snob ....buy once cry once 👍keep up the good work.
Ya thermal snob bastard! LOLZ! Now, to be serious. Thanks for the full disclosure. I feel the win-win provides excellent opportunities for the manufacturer to improve their product based on you and other folks in the club giving these units some real-world testing. Professional feedback is priceless. I'm interested in getting a thermal scope/imager for use in my photography. I reckon that when I get back into the rainforest I could use one to find tree kangaroos and other animals in the forest at night, and maybe even in daytime in full canopy rainforest. As you can tell, I have no idea how thermal works in daylight but yeah, I could use a thermal camera/finder.
I reckon you could use one for that absolutely. So long as the UV under the canopy is low the animals should stand out. Humidity would be an issue but if its just detection then bino's you might be on a winner.
Great review as per usual. Only fault is I think you were focused on the back end of the hippo for too long. Oh and what's a dohickki? Is that the same as doovalacki? 👍🏻 Top job and thanks Nathan.
Appreciate the unbiased and honest review, they´re getting hard to find these day´s as many reviewers receive the products they´re reviewing for free.. Is it true though that the actual recorded image quality we´re seeing here (from the units sd card) is only roughly about 60% in clarity, as to what is seen through the actual device itself ? I think I heard or read that somewhere..
I said exactly that in the video 👌 Shame it's not as good as the eyepiece but I've used thermals the other way around, with a better recording than eyepiece image.
@@EDGEoftheOUTBACK Okay I must of missed that part , I was however jumping around through your videos back n forth, and actually saw that you mentioned it in one of the others regarding a different unit..😉 but thanks for the reply 👍
I have owned a few different InfiRay XEYE scanners. And that's all the Night Tech's seem to be from what I've seen first hand. Solid performers but the batteries don't last under sustained use unfortunately.
What would the max reliable heat signature distance be in ideal conditions for this unit? On paper 1300m, but how does that measure up with your use in the field? Thanks
@@EDGEoftheOUTBACK thanks mate. Unfortunately i was asking about heat signature ranges, not ID ranges. To detect and then confirm with binos for recreational hunting. Keep up the good work.
Nice review! Have you ever heard of T2 Pro ? Only $399 thermal monocular, I've seen them everywhere recently and It will be great if I can see your review about it 😀
Thanks good review. I’ve just bought my first thermal at $2000, no names. I’m very impressed and also a little disappointed. It seems after just a few minutes of use my eye is totally or very nearly so, night blind. The thermal eye completely unable to see detail I can clearly see with the other eye. I can go from very bright daylight to very dim and recover in a very short time, maybe a minute or 2. But the thermal leaves one eye blind for many minutes. Is this typical, is it avoidable. No issues after being in artificial light. Can you comment please.
Hola amigo, en la función de detección de xq35 pro, me sale que puede canbiar para que detecte más las cosas pequeñas,. Si le pongo alta resartaria más el animal?
great review, I found it very helpful as I am currently looking into scanner and scope purchase, you covered off all the real world issues and situations for the device. BUT he best part of the video is the rhino rubbing his nuts on a rock..still laughing.
Pro's and con's to each. The FH35R has a better image, it should being 640x512 12um resolution. But I like the Pulsar colour palettes and build a little more. FH35R vs Axion 2 LRF XG35 will be an interesting comparison.
I've got to ask - why do you use thermal spotter scopes.. purely for the image output to a remote screen? The price for a thermal spotter seems to barely differ from a thermal scope.
Scanning all night with a rifle mounted scope is fatiguing (imagine not using binoculars) and it's also dangerous swinging a rifle around to look everywhere. Remember this is all happening in full darkness. I 100% advise to own a thermal scanner before a scope.
@@EDGEoftheOUTBACK thats fair. I see now looking they're at least a few thousand cheaper albeit still a few grand. Aside from the optional rangefinder do you find much difference between thermal spotters? I'm comparing a few and they seem to have very similar specs despite big price variations
I currently have the Thermion 2 XP50 PRO LRF and its hard work constantly shouldering the rifle through the night to scan so am looking for a spotter. Do you happen to know how the cheaper Pulsar offerings perform as far as spotting targets goes to then move to the XP50 scope? Will entry level do the job of finding targets or will I be missing stuff that makes the extra cost truly worth it? Thanks mate :)
I have the xq35. I have mixed feelings. I like the solid feel, size and weather resistant construction. Lots of options on the menu.... But, why a bright green led light near buttons that is always on?? Certainly couldn't use this in shtf situation as u could be seen a mile away not to mention no eye cup options so light spills everywhere. Image quality for video/pics poor quality. Occasionally trouble downloading pictures and videos from xq35 to phone even with good connection, up to date firmware, new Pixel 6a fully updated.... Many times shot video and later found it couldn't be viewed either by download (wouldn't download) or on device. Keep in mind I was able to view other files.... Lately been having trouble with settings being saved after exiting the menu ( contrast/Brightness). Also can't find the file folder on the phone for downloads. Not sure why not given an option for easier access. Location of tripod mount terrible. Lens cap for objective lens not included. The box I received had charging brick with type c USB connector however the cable included was type c and A so couldn't use .... Not sure I would buy again? I certainly would have bought scope instead and wish I could have tried ATN MONOCULAR. I have nothing else to compare it to. ..
I wouldn't touch anything ATN, way to many issues. Nothing is perfect, especially entry level. But for the price point the XQ35 functions well for hunting.
Hey Nathan looking for a good scanner struggling between pulsar axion2 xq35 VS the night tech xd35 Similar price point Does pulsar produce better image quality vs night tech CHEERS Pete
Good review, However the cost of this stuff is pricey, But you get what you pay for generally. The thing that erks me is 6 months later its old tech and you cant give it away , like most tech these days. I'LL stick with the spotlight and scope me thinks. Ive blown enough on that stuff already. I do enjoy your vids.
Fair enough mate. What I've noticed in a few years. Is that the price isn't dropping in thermal. But the value and quality is definitely improving which is great.
My child at 10 subscribed to you and I followed him following you yeah your majority might know all tech shit you are preaching but we love a good hunt night or day and he loves your channel
@@EDGEoftheOUTBACK Wow thats sad, they might feel different if they saw the calves killed or with their tails ripped off or a dozen sheep that have had their kidneys ripped out..
G'day Nathan what's the chances of pulsar sending you a digex C50 day night scope. There's a few reviews from overseas crew but your review would be one we'd trust. A mates thinking about one for his new 6.5prc supervarmint, that he can't get ammo for🤣
not sure y everyone raves about the pulsar so much i nearly coffed up 9 grand on a scope but my local gun shop owner gave me a iaiming 612 for a month to try and with a bit of a check the resolution 1024 and a detection range of 2000 m and $ 4000 cheaper not sure y more people haven't herd of them i haven't seen i paid 4900 inc gst with a run time off 8hrs and honestly would never shine a light at night again would love you to try one if you can get your hands on one you where the reason i got a thermal and was looking at buying what you had and as a recreational shooter who is out on average 3 nights per week it has completely changed the way i hunt now just scanning a paddock from the gate if there's anything about which there always is i just would have missed it with a torch i spend more time on foot and generally get everything that i see as apposed to using a spotlight where the animal knows im looking at it i can take my time get a better shot and don't have to rush best money i have spent so far it also records in 1024 resolution so just to make the point their are unknown brands about that are cheaper and as good quality people just do your research
Glad you enjoy the iAiming 👍. Take the ProStaff shit out of it. I own the Thermion I run, cold hard cash. After using all the other alternatives available, bar the GSCI. For what I do, there's nothing as complete in all aspects.
I have an old schoolmate who, and okay, have a laugh, is involved with a group who head out into the forests on the QLD/NSW border to search for Yowies. They invested in a thermal camera and captured some footage that is hard to explain. They would do well to invest in something with better resolution than they were using. They did describe the camera they used but I can't remember what it was and I'm too tired to hunt down the UA-cam video. I'm a skeptic but knowing this bloke, I can't see him as being the hoaxer type. (5-minutes-later) I found the video. You can make your own conclusions. ua-cam.com/video/sx5WUzzgrfY/v-deo.html
Call to action - If you would like to see the continuation of UA-cam channels like mine or others. PLEASE consider joining Patreon for further support.
www.patreon.com/user?u=37396112
Hey mate. I am in no position to offer patron support at the moment. But I will support you with likes and comments until I can afford to help you out. I learn a lot from your content and appreciate the work you do to reduce feral animal populations. Cheers, mate.
@@BradGryphonn any support, even if just positive vibes is hugely appreciated 👍
Great spot for a review of a monocular! I’ve only been using thermal for 8 months it was a tippy toe in for me but what a game changer for the shooting I do! Double my take for the nights out & can scan large areas really quickly.
Absolutely it's a game changer.
Gotta love the big buggers when they get the wind up but you sorted him.. Excellent job again and great video !
That wasn't the wind. It was my mate down the paddock slotting another boar with a subsonic 308win round. Cagy bugger with the reaction as I didn't hear a thing with his shot.
Great review as always, and also great seeing different animals. Glad you mentioned where you took the shots because I thought you had some real feral problems for a min. I am hoping you do a review of the XG35 soon.
Thanks Glenn, sorry I'm not doing a review on the XG35 at this stage.
I did post a report on the device and a comparison with other thermals on my Patreon for Tier 3 & 4. You would find that beneficial to read if in the market 👌
www.patreon.com/user?u=37396112
Honest and thorough.
Great job mate 👌
Cheers Rod 👌
Great review mate. Keep up the good work we all really appreciate it
Thanks Hamish
I just watched your review on the 50... and there's no comparison.. I think I'll wait and get the helion 2 xp50 pro. Thanks for sharing
It's definitely a big step up in image quality to the Helion 2 XP50 Pro 👍
@@EDGEoftheOUTBACK have you had a chance to try the newer xg35? I think its a 640 chip.. im wondering how it compares with the helion
@@WolfzVideo IMO the only device which compares to a Helion is the new Merger LRF XP50 Thermal Binoculars.
@@EDGEoftheOUTBACK so in other words spend more and get the helion?
Even though Thermal are a “no-go” for most hunting up here in the Great Northern Land I still appreciate your opinion and reviews!
Thanks Michael 👌
I’ll probably never use one Nathan, but to me the video looks pretty good. Thanks for a different type of video and I’m sure that those who already or might in the future use thermal it’s very helpful info.
Cheers Kev 👍
Great Review Mate 👍
Cheers mate 👌
Nice review fella, they look like great bang for your buck 🍻
Great review mate. Very informative. 👌
Thanks mate 👌
This made me laugh as well as being useful :D Cheers mate, warmest regards from across the Pommy pond :)
Thanks mate, glad you enjoyed it 👍🏻
Thanks Amigo.. I'll keep your review in mind for the future..
A great review, very comprehensive mate. Thanks, R
Cheers Russ
Great review mate 👌🏼
Cheers Ben
Awesome review mate
Cheers mate 👌
I love your vids no nonsense honest opinion and your not a bad shot neither 🤣 i run the accolade 2 but as you did started with the axion key and yeah im also a thermal snob ....buy once cry once 👍keep up the good work.
Exactly 👌
Ya thermal snob bastard! LOLZ! Now, to be serious. Thanks for the full disclosure. I feel the win-win provides excellent opportunities for the manufacturer to improve their product based on you and other folks in the club giving these units some real-world testing. Professional feedback is priceless. I'm interested in getting a thermal scope/imager for use in my photography. I reckon that when I get back into the rainforest I could use one to find tree kangaroos and other animals in the forest at night, and maybe even in daytime in full canopy rainforest. As you can tell, I have no idea how thermal works in daylight but yeah, I could use a thermal camera/finder.
I reckon you could use one for that absolutely. So long as the UV under the canopy is low the animals should stand out. Humidity would be an issue but if its just detection then bino's you might be on a winner.
@@EDGEoftheOUTBACK Thanks mate. I may chew your ear further down the track when I'm ready to buy one if that's okay?
thoroughly enjoyed your review, sitting up here in Seattle WA, and the variety of animals you’re scanning. Thnx!
Great review as per usual. Only fault is I think you were focused on the back end of the hippo for too long. Oh and what's a dohickki? Is that the same as doovalacki? 👍🏻
Top job and thanks Nathan.
Absolutely different thingamajigs
Say it as is! I love that very well done👌.
Thanks Chris
Hola amigo, que configuración tendría a que poner para que resalte más el animal
You need to tune it to suit the environment conditions.
very informative and detailed, thanks for sharing
Glad you enjoyed it and I appreciate the comment 👍
Appreciate the unbiased and honest review, they´re getting hard to find these day´s as many reviewers receive the products they´re reviewing for free..
Is it true though that the actual recorded image quality we´re seeing here (from the units sd card) is only roughly about 60% in clarity, as to what is seen through the actual device itself ? I think I heard or read that somewhere..
I said exactly that in the video 👌 Shame it's not as good as the eyepiece but I've used thermals the other way around, with a better recording than eyepiece image.
@@EDGEoftheOUTBACK Okay I must of missed that part , I was however jumping around through your videos back n forth, and actually saw that you mentioned it in one of the others regarding a different unit..😉 but thanks for the reply 👍
Would like that you can test night tech stealth series 2,by my opinion most underated thermal monoculars on aussie market
I have owned a few different InfiRay XEYE scanners. And that's all the Night Tech's seem to be from what I've seen first hand. Solid performers but the batteries don't last under sustained use unfortunately.
What would the max reliable heat signature distance be in ideal conditions for this unit? On paper 1300m, but how does that measure up with your use in the field? Thanks
I did cover various ID distances I recall. This video was a while ago.
@@EDGEoftheOUTBACK thanks mate. Unfortunately i was asking about heat signature ranges, not ID ranges. To detect and then confirm with binos for recreational hunting. Keep up the good work.
Nice review! Have you ever heard of T2 Pro ? Only $399 thermal monocular, I've seen them everywhere recently and It will be great if I can see your review about it 😀
Sorry I won't be playing with a T2. Have heard a few bad stories. And a lot of bullshit from a few UK Influencers 😒
Thanks good review. I’ve just bought my first thermal at $2000, no names. I’m very impressed and also a little disappointed. It seems after just a few minutes of use my eye is totally or very nearly so, night blind. The thermal eye completely unable to see detail I can clearly see with the other eye. I can go from very bright daylight to very dim and recover in a very short time, maybe a minute or 2. But the thermal leaves one eye blind for many minutes. Is this typical, is it avoidable. No issues after being in artificial light. Can you comment please.
Black eye we call that, not a lot you can do with a monocular other than have breaks and try to not run it too bright.
@Edge of the Outback: Nice work! I use the Infiray ZH38 could you review that to the Pulsars? Thx
Don't take this the wrong way. But I've played with both Zoom models and IMO they are poor performers. I've tried and can't use them
Hola amigo, en la función de detección de xq35 pro, me sale que puede canbiar para que detecte más las cosas pequeñas,. Si le pongo alta resartaria más el animal?
great review, I found it very helpful as I am currently looking into scanner and scope purchase, you covered off all the real world issues and situations for the device. BUT he best part of the video is the rhino rubbing his nuts on a rock..still laughing.
Thanks Paul. It was pretty funny at the time I can assure you 😂
InfiRay Finder II FH35R vs this? What’s your thoughts? Obviously a 1k price difference, but is the FH35 that much better or stick with the pulsar?
Pro's and con's to each. The FH35R has a better image, it should being 640x512 12um resolution. But I like the Pulsar colour palettes and build a little more. FH35R vs Axion 2 LRF XG35 will be an interesting comparison.
I've got to ask - why do you use thermal spotter scopes.. purely for the image output to a remote screen? The price for a thermal spotter seems to barely differ from a thermal scope.
Scanning all night with a rifle mounted scope is fatiguing (imagine not using binoculars) and it's also dangerous swinging a rifle around to look everywhere. Remember this is all happening in full darkness. I 100% advise to own a thermal scanner before a scope.
@@EDGEoftheOUTBACK thats fair. I see now looking they're at least a few thousand cheaper albeit still a few grand.
Aside from the optional rangefinder do you find much difference between thermal spotters? I'm comparing a few and they seem to have very similar specs despite big price variations
Yes mate, there's massive differences. I've reviewed a few in detail.
@@EDGEoftheOUTBACK cheers, I'll take a gander
I currently have the Thermion 2 XP50 PRO LRF and its hard work constantly shouldering the rifle through the night to scan so am looking for a spotter. Do you happen to know how the cheaper Pulsar offerings perform as far as spotting targets goes to then move to the XP50 scope? Will entry level do the job of finding targets or will I be missing stuff that makes the extra cost truly worth it? Thanks mate :)
If you have an XP50 try not to step back in image quality from a 640 resolution device for your scanner.
@@EDGEoftheOUTBACK thanks mate
If you had to choose between XQ 35 lrf and FH35r, which would you pick?
I recall I cover that very aspect in the video
Thank you! I went for the FH35r
How would you rate this for using on the quad bike mount you have mate?
I used it a few nights like that. Worked well WiFi connected to a tablet.
Cool. Cheers .
Setting up my quad atm and looking to do something similar.
Do you think the mount is sturdy enough for rough tracks?
All ways go work.Is the LRF just as good in daylight as night time.
Yep, works the same either way 😁
I have the xq35. I have mixed feelings. I like the solid feel, size and weather resistant construction. Lots of options on the menu.... But, why a bright green led light near buttons that is always on?? Certainly couldn't use this in shtf situation as u could be seen a mile away not to mention no eye cup options so light spills everywhere. Image quality for video/pics poor quality. Occasionally trouble downloading pictures and videos from xq35 to phone even with good connection, up to date firmware, new Pixel 6a fully updated.... Many times shot video and later found it couldn't be viewed either by download (wouldn't download) or on device. Keep in mind I was able to view other files.... Lately been having trouble with settings being saved after exiting the menu ( contrast/Brightness). Also can't find the file folder on the phone for downloads. Not sure why not given an option for easier access. Location of tripod mount terrible. Lens cap for objective lens not included. The box I received had charging brick with type c USB connector however the cable included was type c and A so couldn't use .... Not sure I would buy again? I certainly would have bought scope instead and wish I could have tried ATN MONOCULAR. I have nothing else to compare it to. ..
I wouldn't touch anything ATN, way to many issues.
Nothing is perfect, especially entry level. But for the price point the XQ35 functions well for hunting.
Hey Nathan looking for a good scanner struggling between pulsar axion2 xq35 VS the night tech xd35
Similar price point
Does pulsar produce better image quality vs night tech
CHEERS Pete
Get the Axion mate 👌
I think the removable battery is a big factor to
and looks be be a nicer hold in the hand compared to nigh tech
The NT is still comfortable. But I really like removable batteries
Thanks mate Appreciate the help, love the videos keep up the good work
Nath can you get pulsar to get you do a review on the axion xm30 as its a more affordable for most without going into debt for one
Sorry mate, my next devices will be 640 resolution. Honestly I wouldn't buy less than an Axion 2 XQ35.
@@EDGEoftheOUTBACK cheers mate you’ve answered answered my question, i was going to get the xm30 not now thank you
@@EDGEoftheOUTBACK those 640 devices look the dogs gonads mate
Good review, However the cost of this stuff is pricey, But you get what you pay for generally. The thing that erks me is 6 months later its old tech and you cant give it away , like most tech these days. I'LL stick with the spotlight and scope me thinks. Ive blown enough on that stuff already. I do enjoy your vids.
Fair enough mate. What I've noticed in a few years. Is that the price isn't dropping in thermal. But the value and quality is definitely improving which is great.
Weird the recording doesn't include the full frame
UA-cam is 16:9 format. I'm not aware of anything in the digital scope world that matches that.
Hola en qué número tiene ke poner para detecta una liebre, en brío y contrate,
That doesn't translate to anything I can understand in English. There are rabbits as a reference if you're referring to a hare.
Must be alright, I watched the whole video.
Thanks mate 👌, I hope it helped in some way.
MATE!! Love ya channel but you lost me at the start love your hunting but reviews like that just mind fucked me your night shoots are awesome 🤟🏻
That's all good. A huge amount of my viewers really appreciate the insight and details of a review. Can't win em all 👍
My child at 10 subscribed to you and I followed him following you yeah your majority might know all tech shit you are preaching but we love a good hunt night or day and he loves your channel
Have not seen you chasing wild dogs for a fair while Nathan..
Still into em mate. Just not sharing as much on that front. CBF'd with all the hate and rage the topic and video's draw in.
@@EDGEoftheOUTBACK Wow thats sad, they might feel different if they saw the calves killed or with their tails ripped off or a dozen sheep that have had their kidneys ripped out..
You sold me on it.
Why is this common military technology sooooooo pricy ?
It's only consumer level. The. Milspec gear is heaps more expensive 😞
G'day Nathan what's the chances of pulsar sending you a digex C50 day night scope. There's a few reviews from overseas crew but your review would be one we'd trust. A mates thinking about one for his new 6.5prc supervarmint, that he can't get ammo for🤣
I'll see what happens mate. Thermal is my passion though. NV can be niggly in the environments I'm shooting in with the feed length.
Why might mine heated up in box.?
I don't quite understand your question?
just to let you know, I'm a review snob. Anything over ten Mins in length is too long!
I've never been able to review anything in detail that quickly. Especially a thermal 😩
Encuanto sale el sol brilla las piedras igual y te confunde si hay animal oke
All thermals are effected by environment conditions such as this.
not sure y everyone raves about the pulsar so much i nearly coffed up 9 grand on a scope but my local gun shop owner gave me a iaiming 612 for a month to try and with a bit of a check the resolution 1024 and a detection range of 2000 m and $ 4000 cheaper not sure y more people haven't herd of them i haven't seen i paid 4900 inc gst with a run time off 8hrs and honestly would never shine a light at night again would love you to try one if you can get your hands on one you where the reason i got a thermal and was looking at buying what you had and as a recreational shooter who is out on average 3 nights per week it has completely changed the way i hunt now just scanning a paddock from the gate if there's anything about which there always is i just would have missed it with a torch i spend more time on foot and generally get everything that i see as apposed to using a spotlight where the animal knows im looking at it i can take my time get a better shot and don't have to rush best money i have spent so far it also records in 1024 resolution so just to make the point their are unknown brands about that are cheaper and as good quality people just do your research
Glad you enjoy the iAiming 👍. Take the ProStaff shit out of it. I own the Thermion I run, cold hard cash. After using all the other alternatives available, bar the GSCI. For what I do, there's nothing as complete in all aspects.
I have an old schoolmate who, and okay, have a laugh, is involved with a group who head out into the forests on the QLD/NSW border to search for Yowies. They invested in a thermal camera and captured some footage that is hard to explain. They would do well to invest in something with better resolution than they were using. They did describe the camera they used but I can't remember what it was and I'm too tired to hunt down the UA-cam video. I'm a skeptic but knowing this bloke, I can't see him as being the hoaxer type. (5-minutes-later) I found the video. You can make your own conclusions. ua-cam.com/video/sx5WUzzgrfY/v-deo.html
I'll have a look 😂
Even though Thermal are a “no-go” for most hunting up here in the Great Northern Land I still appreciate your opinion and reviews!