EDIT: I made a mistake during the appearance segment of the video. The pro only comes in black. Don’t worry, I tried and tested all 4 rackets of the Nanoflare series and my review IS of the Nanoflare 700 Pro. My apologies for the confusion!
Thanks for the review. Can't wait for your comparison review and really enjoyed when you reviewed the arcsaber to the other series of rackets. Really helps a lot. Thanks
I got the nf700 pro. Played across three consecutive days with one being a whole day casual tournament. It definitely lacks power compared to the nf700. Not massively, but slightly. It’s very light at 4u and it’s fast but I feel as though many people may not reap the benefits without good technique
Thank you for the review, I have been trying to find a racquet that is has a similar swing to NF800 but with slightly more power and stability as i struggle to generate a good backcourt clear with it.
well. tbh, im not a fan of both given the lack of power. and to answer your question, it also really depends on what the user is going for. Speed? power?
@@Aaron7J I'm using 5U, my swings are mostly fast and whippy, 5U helps me generate more speed. Power wise, I have no issue generating power even with smashes. Clears are effortless too. It's all about your technique and form.
This is my PERSONAL theory, i currently use a lot of light weight racket like Gosen Inferno Lite, Lining Windstorm 79H, to make it more ‘Balance’, i strung it using thin string like Exbolt 63 or Ryzonic 58 so i got more attacking power n also can defend with ease as the string really help as thinner string generate high repulsion✌🏼
both of you are right. but i've double checked the statistics and confirmed that i've reviewed the rackets correctly. only the colour was wrong. thank you for the feedback!
EDIT: I made a mistake during the appearance segment of the video. The pro only comes in black. Don’t worry, I tried and tested all 4 rackets of the Nanoflare series and my review IS of the Nanoflare 700 Pro. My apologies for the confusion!
Thanks for the review. Can't wait for your comparison review and really enjoyed when you reviewed the arcsaber to the other series of rackets. Really helps a lot. Thanks
No problem! Keep a lookout for future videos :)
I got the nf700 pro. Played across three consecutive days with one being a whole day casual tournament. It definitely lacks power compared to the nf700. Not massively, but slightly. It’s very light at 4u and it’s fast but I feel as though many people may not reap the benefits without good technique
yes. i feel the same with regards to the lack of power. but that's the trademark for the NF Series.
the NF1000 is really an anomaly.
@@MoreThanASwing The NF700 has way more power than the NF700 pro. NF700 pro is lighter thus quicker. It's all to preference.
Thank you for the review, I have been trying to find a racquet that is has a similar swing to NF800 but with slightly more power and stability as i struggle to generate a good backcourt clear with it.
tbh, 700 pro and NF800 feels quite similar in terms of power.
if you really want more power, try other series. or even other brands like Lining.
Compared to the Astrox 77Pro, is it similar in terms of stiffness?
well.... both racket had the same same displacement of 10.5cm. so the flexibility should be rather similar.
❤🔥🔥🔥❤🔥
good review
how would you compare this to nf800pro regarding the stability, speed and power?
I think the NF800 pro has a bit more speed. but less power.
Stability seems about the same.
hello, would it be possible for you to review the astrox 88d/s 3rd gen? I love that way you do reviews!
I might revisit that.... thank you for your suggestion...
Thank you. I am defensive, Back court smashing attacking player. Currently I have 88D pro 3U.
which is good? 700Pro or 1000z.
Probably the 1000z if you prefer to maintain the power
Defensive play and back court smash have very different requirements.
but i think you might like the NF1000, the AS100 or the Lining Halbertec 8000
700 Pro for smashing , which to get 4U or 5U weight ?
heavier rackets always better for smashing
4u!
I would recommend another model if you want power.
How does that compare to a ARC7P ?
the NF is much lighter. and hence, much quicker.
800pro or 700pro? which one is better?
I have both, 700 pro smashes harder, 800 pro feels faster
well. tbh, im not a fan of both given the lack of power.
and to answer your question, it also really depends on what the user is going for. Speed? power?
@@kelvinwong829 u suggest 700 pro 4u or 5u? for man and mostly play doubles
@@Aaron7J I'm using 5U, my swings are mostly fast and whippy, 5U helps me generate more speed. Power wise, I have no issue generating power even with smashes. Clears are effortless too. It's all about your technique and form.
This is my PERSONAL theory, i currently use a lot of light weight racket like Gosen Inferno Lite, Lining Windstorm 79H, to make it more ‘Balance’, i strung it using thin string like Exbolt 63 or Ryzonic 58 so i got more attacking power n also can defend with ease as the string really help as thinner string generate high repulsion✌🏼
thats a good point. can you imagine a combination of those strings with offensive racket?
Lethal. haha.
The pro version only has 1 colour… i think you tested the normal none-pro version. Suggest you to try the actual 700 pro and then review again 😎
yes you're right. and i mixed up the colours.
however, the test for each racket was conducted accurately.
Thank you though.
Li ning halbertec 9000 review pls
yes.... thats something i would like to review too.
I don’t know if it’s worth upgrading yet, but you are worth subscribing to 😉
Pro where got silver colour? You review the wrong racket.
Only tour and below have the silver colour, don't know don't anyhow say
both of you are right.
but i've double checked the statistics and confirmed that i've reviewed the rackets correctly. only the colour was wrong.
thank you for the feedback!