Is the Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro Worth the Upgrade? COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW AND IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 лип 2024
- Welcome to our in-depth review of the Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro! In this video, we scrutinize whether this badminton racket is worth the upgrade, comparing it to its predecessors, the Nanoflare 800 and Nanoflare 700. 🏸
🔍 Our comprehensive analysis covers everything from design and technology to on-court performance. We'll delve into the key features that differentiate the Nanoflare 800 Pro from the Nanoflare 800 and Nanoflare 700, helping you decide which one suits your playing style and skill level.
📊 Throughout the review, we provide detailed insights into the specifications of each racket, such as weight, balance, and flexibility, facilitating an informed decision. Additionally, we assess the impact on gameplay, considering factors like power, control, and maneuverability for a comprehensive comparison.
🎾 Whether you're considering an upgrade from the Nanoflare 800 or exploring the differences between the 800 Pro and the Nanoflare 700, we've got you covered. Join us as we explore the strengths and potential drawbacks of each racket, giving you a complete picture of their individual characteristics.
👀 Don't miss out on our on-court demonstrations, showcasing each racket in action. See how they perform in different playing scenarios and gain valuable insights into their overall feel and responsiveness.
🤔 Ready to find out if the Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro is the upgrade you've been looking for or which Nanoflare model suits you best? Hit play now and let's dive into this comprehensive review! If you have any questions or experiences with these rackets, share them in the comments below. Your feedback is valuable to us and the entire badminton community!
Gear:
Racket : Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro
Strings: Yonex Exbolt 63
String Tension: 25lbs
Grip: Original Grip
Shoes: Mizuno Wave Claw Neo
Socks: Talking Toes Socks - Good Morning Athletic Sock
sg.talkingtoessocks.com/colle...
For business enquiries: joel@upraise.sg
▬ Contents of this video ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
0:00 - Intro
0:44 - First Impressions (Visual)
1:10 - Racket Characteristics
2:44 - Who's using the racket?
3:04 - Statistics/measurements
3:21 - Measurements: Racket Frame
3:56 - Measurements: Racket Shaft
4:18 - Measurements: Balance Point
5:10 - Measurements: Length of Shaft
5:20 - Measurements: Length of Racket
5:34 - Measurements: Flexibility of Racket
6:08 - How does it translate to the court?
6:26 - Performance in the court: Sweet spot
6:56 - Performance in the court: Drive
7:25 - Performance in the court: Speed/power
7:49 - Performance in the court: Vibrations/feedback
9:55 - Thoughts & Recommendations
10:45 - Is this an upgrade from NF 700/800?
11:30 - Closing - Спорт
![YONEX Swiss Open 2023 | Viktor Axelsen (DEN) [1] vs. Chou Tien Chen (TPE) [3] | SF](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MhIXLtGdKlo/mqdefault.jpg)
yesss pls include the play versions next time! it would be awesome to know if there are other good solid entry (not hollow or cheap feeling) rackets like the 99 play
Thank you for your feedback. We will look at producing videos for intermediate rackets.
love this kind of review ✨
I like this racket review best from all racket reviews I've ever seen :O Keep it going!
Yay Thank you!
what other content would you like to see ?
Thank you very much for your indepth review! Looking for a stiffer version of the Victor TKE racket and this looking like the one! but still considering since i want someone thing stiffer
Thank you for in-depth analysis. Which weights and grip you have used for the comparison? Please compare 3uG5 versions for 1000z, 800pro and 800. Thanks
Doubles player here heavy smasher and back court player. Is this good with exbolt 63 or 65 at what tension? Also would u recommend 1000zz or the NF800pro 3u for my kind of style? Im lacking a bit on defense reaction so im thinking of switching to 800pro but idk if i should do 3u or 4u.
I heard that the 3u version has a stiffer shaft than the 4u. Is this true? Would the 3u then be suitable for back court heavy hitters?
Which version of Nanoflare 80 pro do you recommend? 3U version or 4U version?
May I ask on how does the 800 pro compare to arcsaber 7 pro? Which one is easier to play?
Great review. Hope you'd review the 800 play and also compare the 800 pro with the 1000z, 100zz, 88s pro, and 77 pro (because i heard that the 88s pro and 77 pro are slightly easier to play and slightly head lighter than other astrox rackets). Thank you so much. Keep up the great work.
if headlight characteristic is a priority, you should definitely look at the the NF series and not the Astrox series.
but among the Astrox series, the headlight rackets are... astrox 77 pro,, 99, 99Pro.
@@MoreThanASwing Thank you so much for the recommendation
@@MoreThanASwing 99 pro is headlight? it is the head heaviest in the Astrox series.
is true that the nanoflare rackets are easy to break if you clash rackets?@@user-sp4bn8od3z
Next NF 800Pro vs NF 1000Z
Overall, your review is great 👍
It depends what is your playing style and what characteristics are you looking for :)
Could you do a comparison video of Nanoflare 1000z and Nanoflare 800 pro.Which has more power and control. I would like to know that.
For Power and Control, I think the 1000Z is still better.
BUT, and this is a big but... But the 1000Z is harder to use. It seems to have a smaller sweet spot.
Is that balance point correct? NF1000z is 292mm and above 300mm is usually head heavy rackets. Also what's the overall weight of the racket?
it is not easy to measure the balance point of the racket, without the actual machine. But to keep it as precise as possible, i use the same method across all the rackets a review. so the results should be pretty reliable, at least comparatively.
the weight of the racket also depends on whether this is the 3U or the 4U version.
the 4U version is 92.44g.
Bro, good Video. Just a suggestion, please don't use a background music and if u do use, keep the music volume at the minimal. Cheers.
you are right. i will correct that in the next video.
thank you for the feedback.
Front court player from double who’s currently using 7pro. Isit recommended to try out the nf800 pro?
the Arcsaber 7 pro and the NF 800 Pro has a very very very different feeling.
If you want something similar, the NF800P will not be for you.
but if you want something different, then you should try the NF800P. it is a good doubles front court racket.
Very nice information thnx 👍
Thank you!
Yes. Please review the 800 Play compared to other Play series
Thank you for suggesting. i will be focusing on professional rackets for now. but will look into mid tier rackets in future.
Hi there, im struggling to choose either the 4u new nf800 game or the older nf800 . Which would you advise?
The feeling you get is very different.
The NF800P seems to have a larger sweet spot than the NF800. But it seems to lack the power.
so it depends which feeling you prefer.
@@MoreThanASwing thank you. I either go for the og 800 or 800lt.. hopefully it is durable as ive heard they are quite fragile
Music too loud, other than that awesome video!
Sorry about that. We will definitely take note in the next video.
Its perfect for me
Can you review the 800 play??
Thank you for the reviews.
Please do review of play variants.
Nf800 play
Ax77 play
AS 7 and 11 play.
Hi there, i am currently focusing on professional rackets. but i believe i will explore mid range rackets soon!
@@MoreThanASwing got it. Will stay tuned on your next reviews.
The wide profile does not make the head more aerodynamic. It is the aero-frame that makes the head more aerodynamic. The wide profile gives the head more rigidity because it is an aero-frame. If the aero-frame is slim like the original 800 then it will crumble when power shots are played. The original 800 has a slim profile because it is using the aero-box frame, which is a blend of rigidity and aerodynamic.
I really like your comment and i think this is one of the best feedback.
I stand corrected. Your distinctions are important.
Typically, the nanoflare series usually has a wide profile and an aerodynamic frame. but you are right, it shouldn't be taken for granted as there are rackets with wide profile but not aero frame.
in this case, it has both aero frame and wide profile. hence, it has greater speed and repulsion.
It is better than the NF 1000z? Can you explain the difference?
I personally prefer the 1000Z. Comparing the 2 models, NF800 pro is more head light and stiffer.
I want to ask between this two racket which is more powerful and speed?
The Axforce feels more powerful and the Halbertec feels more speedy. :)
So do you think 1000z is still a better racket compared to 800 pro?
the right question might be : what's better or worse off.
There is no racket that is absolutely better. But there are rackets that are more suitable for your playing style and your preference.
Perhaps I'll phrase it this way, I prefer using the 1000Z way more than the NF800P.
ho does this feel compared to astrox 77 pro. for lob, defend, smash, and headfeeling?
it is really quite a different feeling.
although statistically, they are both headlight. The astrox 77 pro has a stronger feedback and hence feels more powerful.
i'll encourage you to borrow the rackets and give it a try.
but if you cant borrow and must make a decision:
Astrox 77 Pro : balanced play. front court doubles or singles player.
NF 800 Pro: Counter attack, defend, doubles front court player.
@@MoreThanASwingi go for Nnf800pro, is 800 pro save for block n lob? Double player
Can u compare with mizuno jpx 10.3 & lining rackets?
I dont have any Mizuno rackets at the moment. but i'll be happy to review if they send some over. :)
Doubles rear court preference and like to smash. 1000z over the NF800Pro?
Why not astrox series? Nanoflare quite fragile
between the 2 choices you have given, i would choose the NF1000Z.
but if you give me more choices, there are many other options: Astrox 88D Pro. Lining Axforce 80/100.
How does it feel compared to Astrox 99 pro?
It feels like a totally different racket.
I feel the key difference is when the racket makes contact with the shuttle. The NF800P has a shorter sharper, stronger vibration.
The Astrox 99 Pro feels a bit more stable.
Can somebody tell me if this racket is more durable compared to the 1000z??
I suspect you might need to wait a few months to have your answer.
both their frames are rather light weight.
Hi matee i have beeb using 100zz 4u.. wondering if I should try this.. if so shoul i go 3u or 4u
questions: what do you like or not like about 100ZZ that way, i can suggest whether 800P is suitable.
also, where you using 3u or 4u and were you happy with the weight?
@@MoreThanASwing i love how solid it is the racket feel like the shuttle just go wherever i go for.. and 4u i am happy with it
@@08wewe 100ZZ was my main racket for about 3 years. I loved it. But i replaced it with the NF1000Z recently.
It sounds like we have a similar taste for rackets. if that's true, i suggest the NF1000Z and not the NF800P.
@@MoreThanASwing yups I watch the video that you mentioned you change it to 1000z. Thank you for the recommendation appreciate!!
Good video. but maybe you can lower the volume of your music. can't really quite hear your voice
Sorry about that. we will take into consideration in the next video. :/
is the nf800pro in this video 4u or 3u?
all my rackets are 4U for consistency.
How does this compare to the arcsaber11 pro?
I'll like to begin with my bias against the arcsaber series. They feel too stable and lack the excitement and speed that I like.
So these two rackets have a completely different feeling in your hand. It is quite unlikely that one likes both for the same reason.
In conclusion, if you are looking for an upgrade that is similar to Arcsaber 7, this is unlikely the one. But if you are looking for a different racket, give this a try. It is faster and more exciting. But also possibly more difficult to use.
@@MoreThanASwing thanks! i’ll probably look into grabbing one for myself
Nf 800 pro head is heavy or like arc 11 pro ?
Both are considered quite headlight.
but they are not too different.
NF800P Balance: 30.8
Arcsaber 11 Pro : 31.1
but arcsaber 11 Pro is very flexible at 10.9
NF800P is 9.4
@@MoreThanASwingwhich one easy to use ?
I think everyone's question is what are your thoughts of 800 Pro vs 1000z
Indeed, 1000z is a brand new version and innovation of Nanoflare series, whereas 800 pro is actually been sold out later than 1000z, with copper added, if i am correct, can't remember if 1000z also made with copper. Personally, without trying these rackets, I think 800 pro can produce more attacking strengths than 1000z, in inference though lol
@@cheetjan I've played with a 1000z and found it very stable and suited to my style. Very smooth and good power for my backhand and forehand. From this and other reviews, it seems the 800 Pro is better suited for doubles.
I think the NF1000Z produces more power with a smaller sweet spot.
I dont recommend it for intermediate players.
The NF800P is much more forgiving. even though it may feel less powerful, it may produce more consistent output for the average players.
Please review play too. Thx
I might explore more mid tier rackets soon. but currently, there's too many professional rackets to review.
Review the game version pls
Thank you for you feedback, i will definitely consider.
Is this 4u or 3u?
4u
This should’ve been called the Nanoflare 700 Pro!
I didn't think of that but I totally agree!
please compare it with 1000Z 😁
I am personally sticky to 1000Z.
i think the key difference is the smaller sweet spot (which is more difficult to handle). but with that, it comes with much greater power.
music is really very annoying......
NF800 PRO colour like Voltric Z Force 2 ! Nothing special .
it looks like they are quite different actually. one is closer to black while the other is closer to a bluish green. but more than just the colour, the voltric series and NF series have a very first focus.
Tell your sister to practice on her piano when you aren't doing a vid.
I'm so sorry. but we will definitely take note in the next video.
Great advice but extremely poor delivery. You don’t need to be that harsh