Lawyer Reacts to Willy Wonka’s Crimes | Fandom IRL
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 гру 2023
- Defense attorney Doug Ridley (www.ridleydefense.com) reacts to the many, many potential crimes of Willy Wonka during his infamous chocolate factory tour. Are the Oompa Loompas forced labor? Should consumers be worried about food poisoning? Can kids even sign contracts? Our expert catalogs the major offenses on display and preps a possible defense.
FANDOM
Executive Producer: Billy Patterson
Producers: Semhar Debessai, Spencer Gilbert
Editor: Michał Arcimowicz
Assistant Editor: Kayla Fyfe
Post-Production Supervisor: Emin Bassavand
Post-Production Specialist: Rebecca Castaneda
Content Manager: Mikołaj Kossakowski - Розваги
I love that this attorney has lightsabers on his wall while he explicitly lists why Willy Wonka is a criminal.
I think I saw the Youngling Slayer 9000 in his holder too 😄
"For a thousand generations, the Jedi Knights were the guardians of peace and justice in the Old Republic..."
Now I want a Disney+ show about a Jedi lawyer who goes in and shuts down exploitative corporations.
The evidence of intent is that there's only ever enough seats for the remaining children at each step.
I always wondered if that was part of Dahl’s book or not… or was it just from the movie??
Now I want a sequel with Charlie dealing with all of the legal ramifications of this and unseen issues with the factory
Wonka and the Lawsuit Factory.
"Hey Boss, the OSHA guy is here. Does he, 'get mugged on the way to the factory by kids?'"
"You want the tooth!" "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE SWEETTOOTH"
I’d like a movie about how Wonka shut the factory down because of slugworths spies
In the book sequel, Charlie and the Glass Elevator, Willie Wonka singlehandedly saves humanity from an alien invasion, so he'd probably get some slack for that.
I didn't know there was a sequel. How have we never got a movie for that one?
@@christopherhughes3551 Not his best work, to be honest -- it's a bit all over the place. But kind of okay by sequel standards =)
A couple videos have made the point that the case could be made that wonka could face trafficking charges with the Oompa Loompa
The book takes place sometime during the 1920's, and the movie best guess late 1940's/early 50's due to the TV references.
How many of these events would be illegal based on the laws of the time? Due to how bizarre some of the events are, I'd be curious how much of it is actually addressed.
We'd be looking at the laws roughly 75 years or in the case of the book, a century ago.
I'd also be interested in hearing from a british lawyer, since the book is, you know SET IN ENGLAND NOT THE US.
I thought it took place in the 70s according to Film Theory.
@@frankm.2850even in the 70s movie, the factory appears to be located in Germany. They never said it was in the US.
There’s actually a lot of ambiguity about the time and place it’s set.
Hm well Wonka does acknowledge the ceiling of the Fizzie Lifting Drinks room needs to be washed and sterilized because Charlie and Grandpa merely touched it, so I would think it's a safe bet he adheres to health protocol and won't be shipping out any of the candy from the first room.
He also mentioned that Austus contaminated his chocolate river. The rest of the kids he seemed kinda blasé about but that one sounded like real concern and panic...for his chocolate. And probably his bottom line. 😂
Legal Eagle calculated what Willie's prison sentence, and length, would be several years ago. It's worth a watch.
Really enjoyed this, thanks. It's something inherent in Dahl's style - captured so well in the ORIGINAL film - that there's such a breezy, cavalier attitude to any kind of danger. a sort of transgression of all adult warnings and proscriptions that make his stories so appealing to kids.
Also, let's face it, Gene Wilder would have gotten away with any of these charges just on personality alone.
Willie Wonka is guilty of a lot of stuff... But Grandpa Joe is still the villain
How does he has 5 Lightsabers? How many people lost their hands to those?
Would have been much more interesting if they had talked with a british lawyer who understood the law of the timeframe in which the book was set
Based on the sequel, it was set when the American Space Hotel was being built and given that never actually happened the timeframe is hard to place
This fellow would make a great companion to take to the movies... Never Ending story, here we come!
The series no one wanted but still enjoyed watching! Lawyers Ruin Everything! Haha this was awesome and very informative.
I don't think anyone actually died in the Chocolate Factory. Scarred maybe. Didn't the remake show this? I think the book had it too.
I thought flying cars are already a thing but they are expensive and you would need a pilot's license to fly one anyway.
No, none of the kids died - they were just eliminated from the contest because of their vices.
I'm really distracted by the lawyer's collection of lightsabres.. that's got to be at least £3k worth..
11:38 You can always count on a lawyer's vocabulary to avoid saying "hell nah, this dude's insane" diplomacy skills are high!
I want a second opinion from Law By Mike on this very important topic.
ooh.. that'd be interesting 😊
How about the liability of the parents for letting their kids roam free?
Best one yet!
Did Wonka import all those Oompa Loompas with proper documentation? Work visas, whatever? What about that?
Yes. He smuggled them into the country in crates with holes for their breathing so yes, it’s definitely something he did illegally
I love the five light sabers on the wall behind him
It would be much more interesting to do a video on his light sabers.
I love the lawyer's comments and Violet's facial expressions!
I love this series
"Reckless: Case in point: One L by Scott Turow. One of the profs use the shooting analogy, exactly!
a fine addition to my collection
I'm so glad that lawyers like this weren't around in the '70's!
How fun!
His singing in the boat would qualify for terrifying!
At the end of the book, the kids are shown leaving the factory alive, but with problems resulting from their actions.
This needs a follow up! Great guest. How much do you think each kid could get in a lawsuit for physical & emotional damages? Or do you think the 4/5 kids could get more in a class action lawsuit for signing the same contract (even though it was already null and void for minors)
Can we question why this attorney has lightsabers stacked up on his wall instead of secured in a safe location? Imagine if a kid walked into his room…
You mean a youngling?
The chocolate river wasn't for display, it was how the ingredients were mixed before it got pumped into other areas of the factory.
Well, I always thought this was a European company from all the architecture. So it might be the laws of that specific country, not necessarily here in the US. I doubt German, because no one has that accent, except for the Gloot boy.
Roald Dahl was English, so that's the obvious place to start.
9:49 A drone is, by definition, unmanned.
This is all under the impression that Wonka is being serious. He's not, he knows exactly what hes doing and what he's saying. He is always non challant about everything which means he knows whwt us going to happen and that it's not permanent. She doesnt get sent to the incinerator, she just goes down the pipe to where they use the discarded eggs for something else
🤣The ad before this video was *Johnny Depp's* Sauvage by Dior with the wolves. 🥰
I'd hire this lawyer in a heartbeat, considering how tongue-in-cheek he is on this topic, _and_ his display collection of lightsabers...
This has already been done my Legal Eagle a few years back.
I’ve always felt like the chocolate factory was in in some way detached from the world and maybe even a gateway to another dimension, seeing that Wonka is not in the least bit phased by threats of lawsuits or the ramifications of maiming (or, possibly killing) the children (and not just because he might be planning to pawn off all that legal trouble on Charley); within that factory it seems like the laws of physics don’t apply, so how much more the laws of the land?
What about the boat scene?
What about the labor laws from the book publication date?
1964
What if the "furnace was turned on"? Veruca Salt!
To take it out of context, to horror "Get Out!"
I think this misses the mark. He is evaluating it based on current laws but should be looking at the 40's or so. Also he mentioned the FAA, which is American but this takes place in Britain if I remember correctly.
(from UK) sort of Britain, sort of anywhere. One of the (original) film's charms, I've always thought.
If the glass elevator scene has the potential for suing due to emotional harm, then what about that glass walkway along a cliff in China that has a section which uses a transparent LCD screen and a speaker to make you think it's breaking? I've seen the videos of people reacting to that, clearly there is not advance notification.
I'm just waiting on the a24 version of Wonka
Negligence!
Are the Augustus bars vegetarian?
what a great video idea haha
He didn't make much effort to stop the kids from getting injured/possibly killed!
I would sue for the terrors of the "Wondrous Boat Ride"!
4:30 "Oompa, loompa, doompidy dee! We were trafficked, we want to be free!"
He left out the experimentation on Oompa-Loompas.
Oompa loompa do pa da dee
Police come here and set me free!
Oompa loompa do pa de doo
I haven't eaten since I was two!
Oompah loompa doopity do
Better call a lawyer
We're gonna get sued
Oompah loompa doopity dee
That rhymes with culpability
Can we talk about the fact that they’re talking about US law while the movie is set in the UK? lol
Actually the movie (and the book before it) have some level of ambiguity
Willy Wonka: "Don't start a war you can't win."
Actually, the kids return in the book after Charlie wins the factory.
You see serval safety hazards and the children are put into dangerous situations and the factory would be shut down by the health department
Now do "Revenge of the Nerds!!!!"
All the osha violations would be enough to shut wonka down
I thing the scene with the bubbles was off limits
Hey it was the 70s
And the book was written in 1964 so (assuming loyalty to the book) it might be set in an alternate version of the 1960s
Willy Wonka is my spirit animal.
"Attractive Nuisance": like a swimming pool!
"Chocolate River!"
Kids can't sign contracts. That seems significantly important for a lot of issues, fictional or irl.
Rest in peace gene wilder
It’s a movie made for kids and adults
I would assume this takes place somewhere in Europe so would not fall under US laws
The books are ambiguous (and sort of inconsistent) about if the book’s set in England or America
Free candy for the legal team?
This is Good
You got a California attorney to talk about British industrial law. You need to put "if in Cali" in the title or something. California is crazy in and of itself. Wonka would just grease Newsom's palm and get away with all of it. ALA Disney.
Finally justice! Hated Willy Wonka since I was a kid, he was horrifying! And the chocolate factory sequel he’s even worst
…. WTF?
Willy Wonka is a legit maniac 😂
I couldn't sit through this whole thing but wanted to add if it wasn't mentioned that if it were here in America, regardless of what was done, it was pretty much put out there that he was rich enough to just do what he wishes without consequence. So everything was "legal" enough.
Legal Eagle.
Nothing against this guy but was LegalEagle not available?
Its a story. Its not real. Why this? Whats the point of having a real police talking about a fictional story??? How woke is that idea???
He's not Legal Eaglw. There's 2 lawyers on UA-cam? More grooming problems going on SMH