Great video Tim! Good to show the practicality as a family hauler.... Love the LZ0 3.0L diesel. I consistently get 22-26 city, 25-34 hwy, (with my lead foot). DEF usage is about 7k miles (until I tow). Keep it up Tim.
34 highway with the LZ0? I have a 2024 high country Silverado with the LZO that I put ~8k miles a month of pure highway driving and the best I’ve done is 31.5. I typically get 26.4. What are the speed limits you’re driving on? I do notice significantly better mpg around 50 vs 70+ which my highways are.
I have a 2WD Silverado with 3.23 rear axle. I'm in Texas so it is mostly flat. Driving between 60-70 mph I get between 32-34 mpg. When I want to get there quickly, I'm between 75-85 mph (occasionally above to pass), getting about 26mpg. Got about 13k miles. Changed my break-in oil at about 1,000 miles & regular oil changes about 5, 000 miles (with Amsoil). . . Love the torque in this engine. Hope this helps!
Nice looking rig. I think you are right; the baby Duramax is an ideal powertrain from GM right now. A great combo of power and economy. I much prefer the layout of the GM screens to some others. They look well integrated to the dash.
And with the added bonus of range anxiety, horrific resale value and easily totalled in a minor accident. Hard pass. Oh and don’t forget a $25,000 battery replacement ev troll.
I wish America had more diesel options in SUVs. One thing that concerns me about this engine is the timing chain in the back requires pulling the engine or trans to service it.
I wish we had the same diesel offerings as EU and other countries. But most importantly, thank you for doing dad things with your boys & sharing….family is the number 1 most important thing we can do IMHO.
@@Pickuptrucktalk I guess I mean as an engine offering in a wider number of vehicles. I’d love to have a 2024 Toyota Land Cruiser Diesel like Toyota sells in Germany or a 3 series BMW with a diesel. I think most vehicles in Europe are offered with a diesel power option.
In SA we have stuff like Toyota fortuner diesel Nissan patrol diesel Toyota Land Cruiser 70 series diesel. I definitely think North America lacks a lot of Japanese diesels that are very good and fun….
Blame your strict emission laws diesel in US are installed with emission devices that doesn't help with engine longevity might as well just get a gas powered car.
Really appreciate this review. I haven't bought an American made car ever in my life, and I've been looking at the Tahoe for my family hauler. Reliability and longevity are very important to me. This review was really helpful.
Nice to see real world use of a vehicles. As someone that has two kids, and thinking of buying a new SUV sometime next year, it's good to see a review like this.
Yes 🙌 I want it! 8k miles on my 24 TB with the 3 liter, no oil usage that I’ve noticed. I also have the 5.3 and 6.6 duramax and I prefer the 3 liter, hopefully ordering this next year.
Low-end grunt is the biggest advantage of these oil-burners. Drivers won't find themselves flooring the pedal just to get a decent pull and that helps even more with the fuel economy.
Great review, been looking forward to seeing people review the Duramax engine option because that's what I plan to get. I specifically want the RST with duramax. Also I like the kids review as well, I have 2 little ones myself and its nice to know that they'll be comfy & they love the tv's for entertainment. I agree with the bbq chips btw LOL. 😂 Overall great video.😊
I think you made a great clarifying openning point regarding the 3.0 - it’s not a heavy duty towing engine but a fuel economy engine. At the same time, I think 8K towing is more than enough for 90% of the people that buy these to pull their campers, boats, utility trailers etc. I think its a great looking SUV. Im happy to hear that the seats are improves as well. What was your fuel economy?
About 22. I thought I said you could probably get 26 on a long trip. I did a lot of idling since I was filming and letting it run to show off the engine noise.
I understand and appreciate the bump in fuel economy. However, those gains are more than offset by the 20% (average) price premium for diesel fuel, added cost of DEF, and increased diesel maintenance cost. The tie breaker with diesel vs gas is torque for towing and hauling. But you made it clear this is not a towing diesel. For me, the value prop is tough to find.
Actually... on average, if you look at either the 6.2 or the 5.3 you're getting approx 30 cents / mile... and the diesel is getting 19 cents / mile. And that is WITH cost of def added in. Soooo it's 11 cents / miles cheaper to go with diesel. Now, you're right on one part....add in the extra expense of costlier oil changes and fuel filter changes .... soooo 11 cents X 6,000 = $660... I think I'll stay with diesel 3.0 L
I own both gas and LZ0 and I can make two trips to the mountains with the gasser and 3 or 4 trips with the diesel. Also own the 2022 6.6 Duramax and this LZO is rackin up the miles because it’s soooooo good! Just my opinion
I don't remember if it was John Barta or someone else at GM early on that said it, but basically the 3.0 was always intended to be a daily driver / commuter for the MPG with the added benefit of the torque a light duty diesel provides for pulling the boat to and from the lake on the weekend, a small to mid sized trailer for home improvement goods, etc. i.e. for the average Joe. I personally do not think a 1/2 ton should be pulling 8k+. 5-7k is the sweet spot for the 3.0. That's all I've ever asked for out of my LM2 and it does it well.
Great test. We are waiting to order ours and my wife needed to see this video. Good overall test and especially how quiet the cabin is with a diesel. Have you heard any truth about having to wait until April or May for a Z71 diesel? My dealership in Florida has mentioned it. Keep the videos coming. All good stuff
That 3.0 diesel has been the best thing they did for these vehicles. It's just unfortunate how expensive these vehicles are though. 80k? Get the hell out of here!
@@Pickuptrucktalk they should start at 40k. Max trims should reach 60k. These prices are unbelievable, but I know it's due to inflation. You use an inflation calculator and you'll see how these vehicles are maybe a few hundred bucks more despite all the new tech in them if we are using 2019 dollar value.
They should start in the mid to upper 40s for an LS. A mid trim should be high 50s to near 60k. A denali/high country is a 70k vehicle. GM is inflating these prices for pure profit. The input costs on these SUVs is half of what GM sells it for because they are trying to finance EV investments with it.
@@Pickuptrucktalk that would cost around 59.2k today. In contrast the 2024 model Tahoe starts at 56.2k. According to GM authority the new 2025 LS starts at 60.5k so there is a significant price increase from the out going model, but only about 1.3k more if you factor in inflation for 2010.
As a disabled guy without a vehicle existing in Idaho. A vehicle like this would be a game changer for me. I could use it as a taxi to earn a better living and hopefully get off government benefits! If only Chevy would donate one! 🥺
My problem is I need a smidge more payload on these trucks. Tow a minilite 2509s and has a tongue weight around 940lbs. My 2018 1500 has a payload of 1800. With kayaks, wood, humans, I’m just under my max payload. I don’t recall seeing a payload greater than 1600 with the diesel. 3/4 is overkill and a 1/2 ton is barely enough. Too bad they won’t increase the GVWR.
Good video about the Tahoe, when I see a Tahoe I already imagine FBI agents throwing people inside to be interrogated hahahahah, leaving the jokes aside, I thought it was a nice car with a good Duramax turbo and I would definitely have one.
I use to say that a lot! After owning the LZ0 and the 6.6 duramax…..they are not made for the same purpose. Still own both of them and the LZ0 works so much better for a daily driver. I get 25mpg in town with the 3 liter and almost have got 800miles on one tank of gas twice! So yeah 25-35mpg with gobbs of torque but the 6.6 Duramax still sounds better I cannot lie 😂 Definitely thinking about trading the 3500 on a new Tahoe with LZ0 since I don’t tow a lot, it’s just more practical.
Thank you for your excellent videos on trucks. Yours are the best out there with very insightful information. I need to find that video of yours where you talk about some updates you made to the engine including that oil pan. I am thinking about either the Tahoe or Silverado High Country Duramax. I will never tow anything but will make trips to Lowes often. I don't need the third seat. I like having a truck because.. it's a truck. But the Tahoe should be able to fit in my garage in PA where we gets frost and some snow. I'm in my 50's and love the torque the Duramax engine gives. Will drive 2 to 4 hour destinations either by myself or with the wife. For this situation, which do you think I would enjoy the most? No pressure. 😂
I was under the impression that they had updated the 3.0 to fix the oil burning issue. Either way, that's a beautiful machine. Exactly what I'm planning on getting other than super cruise. I thought there was a driving footage embargo?
I was under the impression that diesels need to work hard and get hot so short trips aren’t good as the engine doesn’t get up to optimal running temperature.inheard GMC uses a google system now and Apple car play/Android auto is discontinued. Diesel here in Canada is roughly 20-21 cents more than regular gasoline on average so operating costs as well as general maintenance is will cost you more per mile than gasoline vehicles. Servicing and cost of parts is so much more so theres def no cost savings.
First, that’s old diesel knowledge. New diesel’s won’t let you turn them off if they need regen. Second, the GM on Apple being discontinued is just on EVs.
Great Video, Question how were you able to get this 2025 with the 3.0 , I've been calling over to order one they say not until late march or mid April ?
Zero truth. Garbage reporting making assumptions about the EPA. I’ve talked with people who work with the EPA from the manufacturing side. No truth at all to those reports.
This diesel is amazing check this out Actually... on average, if you look at either the 6.2 or the 5.3 you're getting approx 30 cents / mile... and the diesel is getting 19 cents / mile. And that is WITH cost of def added in. Soooo it's 11 cents / miles cheaper to go with diesel. Now, you're right on one part....add in the extra expense of costlier oil changes and fuel filter changes .... soooo 11 cents X 6,000 = $660... I think I'll stay with diesel 3.0 L
Great video. Cool to include your boys. I have LM2 Yukon XL. Does the Owners Manual suggest fuel additive for the LZ0 like the LM2? Likely won't refresh b/c this looks like a mild mid-cycle refresh and not worth it on a 90k vehicle
@@chop1834 It does if you are having issues with the truck. It recommends a GM branded additive. I never had an issue myself when I had the Silverado LZ0 for a year.
The biggest problem with diesels is the fuel! I love the R-95/99 blends. But the best performance is found using Hot Shots Secret EDT. I am considering replacing my 2016 Ram 1500 4wd 3.92 ratio Ecodiesel with something that has a better psyload. My Dodge Durango has a 60# higher payload than my pickup. On icy roads the smaller diesel is more manageable than my wife's 2018 Ram 2500 4wd 3.42 ratio 6.7L, and some of that is the gear ratio. While the 3.73 ratio works nicer, a 4.10 ratio would be better. The inline engine keeps the turbo cooler. But if I bought one of the new Chevy diesel pickups. I would have the dealer change the gear ratio to something more useful. If fuel economy matters, just drive 65mph or less. At 62mph, my '23 Jeep Wrangler gets 29-30mpg. Driving 35-50mph down 2 lane country roads of Northern and Central California. My Ecodiesel gets from 27-42mpg depending on the weather and the hills. The Chevy diesel with a 4.10 ratio should do about the same.
I just lemoned my Yukon with the 3.0. Turbo went out at 10k and 30k and it’s dead. Just got a 6.2 and much happier just the mpgs aren’t great. But I’ll take reliability of the 6.2 over mpgs.
Anyone know why on the configurator you can't add the technology package when equipped with the duramax for the lower level trims? This Z71 has it, but on the configurator it makes you delete the duramax if you want to add it. Unless you get the highest trims, the configurator does not let you get the duramax with the digital rearview mirror, super cruise, or the other tech options which to me, makes no sense.
@@stevebennett3356 The change in seat comfort started with the new GMC Acadia and is now making its way throughout the lineup. When I did the GMC Terrain video, the interior designer actually said they worked on making the seats more comfortable. I was shocked and made him repeat what he said. LOL
I love this! Even though I hate how diesels aren't really environmentally friendly and produces many harmful emissions! But the mpg is unbeatable for this size!
No difflocks (front or rear!!). They are available in Silverado and Sierra and Canyon..etc. Only 2" lift and big tires; this is not enough to call it Z71.
Nice vehicle. Diesels always cost the same or more than gas to operate in the end, so whatever your preference. Save on fuel and pay a big bill later if you keep it for long enough. 6.2 and the 3 liter are both nice engines. Hopefully this obvious, and true, statement doesn't stir the pot right up.
@@IrishNew Yeah I know I owned one for 52k miles. Whatever you save it gets recollected and then some. Only a matter of time. Journalists and media always talk about them being cheap to own and run. Talk to any diesel mechanic about that idea lol.
@@peiguy1982 agreed. I work for an Operations dept and have talked to the mechanics that service the many vehicles and they told me Diesel is not cheaper unless your towing everyday, all day.
@@IrishNew Yeah good point heavy towing daily different story. My ecodiesel would do 15 mpg towing vs about 10 mpg with the Hemi. For HD trucks that are designed for daily heavy towing I could see fleet owners coming out ahead a bit. Then again the 10k body off head gasket/injector job pays for an awful lot of gasoline.
@ wait... the paper calculation with a calculator is very misleading compared to the trip computer on the truck ???? You have that backwards my friend.... what was the paper calculation with a calculator for this trip ? Did you do one?
@@tomkeen9421 You missed my point. I did a LOT of idling. That’s why I said that on camera. I did discuss the fuel economy with the idling comment. I’ve done paper vs computer calculations for the better part of a decade. It really isn’t that much different FYI anymore. It used to be a big deal. Now it is off by about .5 mpg on most occasions. Really not worth it anymore.
It's a popular engine choice, with great capabilities. At least in the Silverado/Sierra it can tow up to 13,000 lbs or it can get 29 mpg unladen. With the Tahoe/Suburban I think a lot of the capabilities are hindered with the GM choice for the SUV suspension setup.
@@99-Zulu Independent rear suspension has its pros and cons. However, what bumper pull camper weighs more than 8k lbs loaded down? And what would you actually tow with the Tahoe at 13k lbs? I've never found a single thing.
@Pickuptrucktalk Why not maybe because I look at the vehicles of the past and I like those looks of vehicles.And why is it a problem to go to a used vehicle? I see no problem with going used or pre-owned over a new vehicle I like the Excursion and I like the look of the Square body Chevys and GMCs. And I like the older body styles of vehicles from Ford Ram and the GM twins I see no problem with my comment. I think also a lot of people buy new vehicles not for the right reasons. And that's why a lot of the things in vehicles I dislike and why vehicles are so jacked up in price. And to me a lot of times going used or pre-owned is not a bad thing like people claim it to be. Not everyone needs a new vehicle they just buy a vehicle because they want the next best thing like with phones as well. People have lost touch with wants and needs this is how I live my life and how I was raised. And this is what I believe in maybe you see it differently but I live this what my father taught this and I stand by it.
@@Pickuptrucktalk I'm not trying to be mean if I come off mean my apologies I just think the Excursion is a good vehicle for a family vehicle and the GM twins of Suburban but I like he square body's of the GM trucks from watching the movie Dante's Peak seeing that old school Suburban square body one looks awesome to me vehicles from the past looked so much cooler in my opinion.
@@Pickuptrucktalk I'm 35 years old and for me I find that also to much tech is something that I do not like and for me I rather have some but not over bearing or way too much I like simple and easy and to me sometimes simple is way better then too much tech or having tech that's my opinion.
Great video Tim! Good to show the practicality as a family hauler.... Love the LZ0 3.0L diesel. I consistently get 22-26 city, 25-34 hwy, (with my lead foot). DEF usage is about 7k miles (until I tow). Keep it up Tim.
34 highway with the LZ0? I have a 2024 high country Silverado with the LZO that I put ~8k miles a month of pure highway driving and the best I’ve done is 31.5. I typically get 26.4. What are the speed limits you’re driving on? I do notice significantly better mpg around 50 vs 70+ which my highways are.
I have a 2WD Silverado with 3.23 rear axle. I'm in Texas so it is mostly flat. Driving between 60-70 mph I get between 32-34 mpg. When I want to get there quickly, I'm between 75-85 mph (occasionally above to pass), getting about 26mpg. Got about 13k miles. Changed my break-in oil at about 1,000 miles & regular oil changes about 5, 000 miles (with Amsoil). . . Love the torque in this engine. Hope this helps!
I assume that’s in a truck?
Nice looking rig. I think you are right; the baby Duramax is an ideal powertrain from GM right now. A great combo of power and economy. I much prefer the layout of the GM screens to some others. They look well integrated to the dash.
Like the Blazer - Electrify it. The GM dual motor setup will run circles around the baby duramax. Not worth spending money on this version.
And with the added bonus of range anxiety, horrific resale value and easily totalled in a minor accident.
Hard pass.
Oh and don’t forget a $25,000 battery replacement ev troll.
@@EBIndy Damn every sentence is incorrect, except "hard pass". Troll? You should stop typing with your mouth full.
I wish America had more diesel options in SUVs. One thing that concerns me about this engine is the timing chain in the back requires pulling the engine or trans to service it.
Let me know when an EV SUV gets 600 miles range.... @@kelviskelvis7140
I wish we had the same diesel offerings as EU and other countries.
But most importantly, thank you for doing dad things with your boys & sharing….family is the number 1 most important thing we can do IMHO.
@@JEB757 What’s different with the EU diesels?
@@Pickuptrucktalk
I guess I mean as an engine offering in a wider number of vehicles.
I’d love to have a 2024 Toyota Land Cruiser Diesel like Toyota sells in Germany or a 3 series BMW with a diesel. I think most vehicles in Europe are offered with a diesel power option.
In SA we have stuff like Toyota fortuner diesel Nissan patrol diesel Toyota Land Cruiser 70 series diesel. I definitely think North America lacks a lot of Japanese diesels that are very good and fun….
Blame your strict emission laws diesel in US are installed with emission devices that doesn't help with engine longevity might as well just get a gas powered car.
Really appreciate this review. I haven't bought an American made car ever in my life, and I've been looking at the Tahoe for my family hauler. Reliability and longevity are very important to me. This review was really helpful.
Nice to see real world use of a vehicles. As someone that has two kids, and thinking of buying a new SUV sometime next year, it's good to see a review like this.
Yes 🙌 I want it! 8k miles on my 24 TB with the 3 liter, no oil usage that I’ve noticed. I also have the 5.3 and 6.6 duramax and I prefer the 3 liter, hopefully ordering this next year.
Low-end grunt is the biggest advantage of these oil-burners. Drivers won't find themselves flooring the pedal just to get a decent pull and that helps even more with the fuel economy.
No oil burn here! I’ve got 8k on my TB with the 3 liter.
Great review, been looking forward to seeing people review the Duramax engine option because that's what I plan to get. I specifically want the RST with duramax. Also I like the kids review as well, I have 2 little ones myself and its nice to know that they'll be comfy & they love the tv's for entertainment. I agree with the bbq chips btw LOL. 😂 Overall great video.😊
❤it. Awesome dash which doesn’t look like an afterthought.
I think you made a great clarifying openning point regarding the 3.0 - it’s not a heavy duty towing engine but a fuel economy engine. At the same time, I think 8K towing is more than enough for 90% of the people that buy these to pull their campers, boats, utility trailers etc. I think its a great looking SUV. Im happy to hear that the seats are improves as well. What was your fuel economy?
About 22. I thought I said you could probably get 26 on a long trip. I did a lot of idling since I was filming and letting it run to show off the engine noise.
Tim, do you expect the interior changes and better seats to be implemented into the 2026 GM 1500 lineup?
@@MattN03 they have already done the interior changes except for the seats. I do expect the seats to change and I'd expect it for the 2026 model.
I understand and appreciate the bump in fuel economy. However, those gains are more than offset by the 20% (average) price premium for diesel fuel, added cost of DEF, and increased diesel maintenance cost. The tie breaker with diesel vs gas is torque for towing and hauling. But you made it clear this is not a towing diesel. For me, the value prop is tough to find.
Actually... on average, if you look at either the 6.2 or the 5.3 you're getting approx 30 cents / mile... and the diesel is getting 19 cents / mile. And that is WITH cost of def added in. Soooo it's 11 cents / miles cheaper to go with diesel.
Now, you're right on one part....add in the extra expense of costlier oil changes and fuel filter changes .... soooo 11 cents X 6,000 = $660...
I think I'll stay with diesel 3.0 L
I own both gas and LZ0 and I can make two trips to the mountains with the gasser and 3 or 4 trips with the diesel. Also own the 2022 6.6 Duramax and this LZO is rackin up the miles because it’s soooooo good! Just my opinion
I know others towing with the 3.0 diesel stating it’s a great towing vehicle.
I'm not saying it isn't a good towing engine. Just trying to make sure everyone understands this won't tow 30k lbs.
I don't remember if it was John Barta or someone else at GM early on that said it, but basically the 3.0 was always intended to be a daily driver / commuter for the MPG with the added benefit of the torque a light duty diesel provides for pulling the boat to and from the lake on the weekend, a small to mid sized trailer for home improvement goods, etc. i.e. for the average Joe. I personally do not think a 1/2 ton should be pulling 8k+. 5-7k is the sweet spot for the 3.0. That's all I've ever asked for out of my LM2 and it does it well.
Did they ventilate the front and rear seats on the z71 Tahoe?
@@robd8167 front AND rear? Hmm... I don't believe the rear. I'd have to rewatch my video to see if they did.
Great job Tim
There is a tsb on the oil consumption now. It was faulty cam cover that caused oil to leak into cylinder number 2. The cover was warped. Tsb-22-na-027
Must have fixed it, I haven’t noticed any oil problems with my LZO
Thanks for the heads up.
Very good review Tim!
Great test. We are waiting to order ours and my wife needed to see this video. Good overall test and especially how quiet the cabin is with a diesel. Have you heard any truth about having to wait until April or May for a Z71 diesel? My dealership in Florida has mentioned it. Keep the videos coming. All good stuff
That 3.0 diesel has been the best thing they did for these vehicles.
It's just unfortunate how expensive these vehicles are though. 80k? Get the hell out of here!
Agreed. Like I said, it starts at $61k.
@@Pickuptrucktalk they should start at 40k. Max trims should reach 60k.
These prices are unbelievable, but I know it's due to inflation. You use an inflation calculator and you'll see how these vehicles are maybe a few hundred bucks more despite all the new tech in them if we are using 2019 dollar value.
@@kabloosh699 I Googled it and 2010 the Tahoe starting price was $41k for the Tahoe LS.
They should start in the mid to upper 40s for an LS. A mid trim should be high 50s to near 60k. A denali/high country is a 70k vehicle.
GM is inflating these prices for pure profit. The input costs on these SUVs is half of what GM sells it for because they are trying to finance EV investments with it.
@@Pickuptrucktalk that would cost around 59.2k today.
In contrast the 2024 model Tahoe starts at 56.2k.
According to GM authority the new 2025 LS starts at 60.5k so there is a significant price increase from the out going model, but only about 1.3k more if you factor in inflation for 2010.
I am losing my mind waiting for the 3.0 Duramax. They’re saying dealers can’t even order until early March 😤
Mental.health is very important go buy something off the lot and trade it in when the diesel gets to the dealer.
I sooo want this with a 6.6
I lived basically across the street from the Waco mammoth site and I never went to check it out. 😂 I was just here to see the duramax
As a disabled guy without a vehicle existing in Idaho. A vehicle like this would be a game changer for me. I could use it as a taxi to earn a better living and hopefully get off government benefits! If only Chevy would donate one! 🥺
Great video !!!
My problem is I need a smidge more payload on these trucks. Tow a minilite 2509s and has a tongue weight around 940lbs. My 2018 1500 has a payload of 1800. With kayaks, wood, humans, I’m just under my max payload. I don’t recall seeing a payload greater than 1600 with the diesel. 3/4 is overkill and a 1/2 ton is barely enough. Too bad they won’t increase the GVWR.
Sounds like a Rockwood/Flagstaff problem to me 😂 Lots of choices out there now.
Good video about the Tahoe, when I see a Tahoe I already imagine FBI agents throwing people inside to be interrogated hahahahah, leaving the jokes aside, I thought it was a nice car with a good Duramax turbo and I would definitely have one.
Pricey vehicle, lots of options for a family vehicle in the price range or less
I'd love to see a 6.6 Duramax in the Tahoes and Suburbans
I use to say that a lot! After owning the LZ0 and the 6.6 duramax…..they are not made for the same purpose. Still own both of them and the LZ0 works so much better for a daily driver. I get 25mpg in town with the 3 liter and almost have got 800miles on one tank of gas twice! So yeah 25-35mpg with gobbs of torque but the 6.6 Duramax still sounds better I cannot lie 😂 Definitely thinking about trading the 3500 on a new Tahoe with LZ0 since I don’t tow a lot, it’s just more practical.
Thats a badass rig!!
Hey Tim-
Great review
Nice looking!😊
I really do like the 3.0 Duramax drivetrain. The only reason I’d switch to GM other than the size of the vehicle.
Great video.
Thank you for your excellent videos on trucks. Yours are the best out there with very insightful information. I need to find that video of yours where you talk about some updates you made to the engine including that oil pan.
I am thinking about either the Tahoe or Silverado High Country Duramax. I will never tow anything but will make trips to Lowes often. I don't need the third seat. I like having a truck because.. it's a truck. But the Tahoe should be able to fit in my garage in PA where we gets frost and some snow. I'm in my 50's and love the torque the Duramax engine gives. Will drive 2 to 4 hour destinations either by myself or with the wife.
For this situation, which do you think I would enjoy the most? No pressure. 😂
Diesel option won't allow you to get supercruise and all the z71 offroad gizmos. This thing is just an appearance package in the end.
You can get quad exhaust on the diesel ? Is that new ?
IIRC it was an option.
Is it available? or is that a trial car? Also, how loud is the engine while driving and in idle? That is my wife's one concern.
I was under the impression that they had updated the 3.0 to fix the oil burning issue.
Either way, that's a beautiful machine. Exactly what I'm planning on getting other than super cruise.
I thought there was a driving footage embargo?
@@andrewhersh4040 Embargo ended this morning.
My 3.0 LZO in a 2023 Sierra 1500 seems to burn half a quart over 7500 miles…so not really a big deal. But what a great engine. I couldn’t be happier.
@@texas737pilot according to the TSB, if you tow a lot, you’ll burn more. I don’t tow all the time and I stopped worrying about it.
The mammoth museum in Waco is very interesting and well done!
.
My dream suv ❤❤.
I was under the impression that diesels need to work hard and get hot so short trips aren’t good as the engine doesn’t get up to optimal running temperature.inheard GMC uses a google system now and Apple car play/Android auto is discontinued.
Diesel here in Canada is roughly 20-21 cents more than regular gasoline on average so operating costs as well as general maintenance is will cost you more per mile than gasoline vehicles. Servicing and cost of parts is so much more so theres def no cost savings.
First, that’s old diesel knowledge. New diesel’s won’t let you turn them off if they need regen.
Second, the GM on Apple being discontinued is just on EVs.
Hope you keep it clean on the inside
Great Video, Question how were you able to get this 2025 with the 3.0 , I've been calling over to order one they say not until late march or mid April ?
What was your MPG on the trip? Thank you
Any truth to some online news saying GM is stopping the production of the 3.0 diesel because of upcoming emission restrictions?
Zero truth. Garbage reporting making assumptions about the EPA. I’ve talked with people who work with the EPA from the manufacturing side. No truth at all to those reports.
Whats the mortgage payment 💰?
If you have to ask, you can’t afford it.
This diesel is amazing check this out Actually... on average, if you look at either the 6.2 or the 5.3 you're getting approx 30 cents / mile... and the diesel is getting 19 cents / mile. And that is WITH cost of def added in. Soooo it's 11 cents / miles cheaper to go with diesel.
Now, you're right on one part....add in the extra expense of costlier oil changes and fuel filter changes .... soooo 11 cents X 6,000 = $660...
I think I'll stay with diesel 3.0 L
Great video. Cool to include your boys. I have LM2 Yukon XL. Does the Owners Manual suggest fuel additive for the LZ0 like the LM2? Likely won't refresh b/c this looks like a mild mid-cycle refresh and not worth it on a 90k vehicle
@@chop1834 It does if you are having issues with the truck. It recommends a GM branded additive. I never had an issue myself when I had the Silverado LZ0 for a year.
The biggest problem with diesels is the fuel! I love the R-95/99 blends. But the best performance is found using Hot Shots Secret EDT. I am considering replacing my 2016 Ram 1500 4wd 3.92 ratio Ecodiesel with something that has a better psyload. My Dodge Durango has a 60# higher payload than my pickup. On icy roads the smaller diesel is more manageable than my wife's 2018 Ram 2500 4wd 3.42 ratio 6.7L, and some of that is the gear ratio. While the 3.73 ratio works nicer, a 4.10 ratio would be better. The inline engine keeps the turbo cooler. But if I bought one of the new Chevy diesel pickups. I would have the dealer change the gear ratio to something more useful. If fuel economy matters, just drive 65mph or less. At 62mph, my '23 Jeep Wrangler gets 29-30mpg. Driving 35-50mph down 2 lane country roads of Northern and Central California. My Ecodiesel gets from 27-42mpg depending on the weather and the hills. The Chevy diesel with a 4.10 ratio should do about the same.
I just lemoned my Yukon with the 3.0. Turbo went out at 10k and 30k and it’s dead. Just got a 6.2 and much happier just the mpgs aren’t great. But I’ll take reliability of the 6.2 over mpgs.
come on now. MPG shouldn't be a priority if you buy a large SUV/truck with a V8.
@@Baebon6259 not a priority but it’s a plus when towing. I have the 3.0 in my truck and it gets 15mpgs when towing my boat. The 6.2 will prob get 8
Hum our 6.2 had lifter failure at 13k miles. At 34k now been ok after initial failure
Reliability of the 6.2 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Just wait until your 6.junk locks up from a spun bearing or the lifters blow.
Whyyyy…no supercruise on the Z71 trim
Did they finally give it the auto hold function? Or is it still only available on the Escalade 😏
What do you have to do to get a HUD in these things? Saw High Country didn’t have it either…
Nice!
Anyone know why on the configurator you can't add the technology package when equipped with the duramax for the lower level trims? This Z71 has it, but on the configurator it makes you delete the duramax if you want to add it. Unless you get the highest trims, the configurator does not let you get the duramax with the digital rearview mirror, super cruise, or the other tech options which to me, makes no sense.
Did the seats lay down flat enough for sleeping in the back?
I am confused what the benefits are of diesel. Could you help me?
Hmmm I live in Waco kinda of crazy see your video of Waco…
What was your average mpg?
Low 20s.
@@Pickuptrucktalk Hopefully with 10,000 miles on the clicker its mpg will hit 30 mpg or higher. Thoughts?
Please do a night drive section and does it come with ambient lighting?
It’s in this video.
Nice video
How has the engine held up so far
It has been out for years with lots of happy owners.
@ I read good things but then the occasional horror story about the LZO
@ you can find the same bad information on all engines on the internet. Don’t let analysis paralysis stop you from buying something.
Where?
There.
Does it have a HUD?
This one did.
What is 0 to 60? Thanks!
@@MasterofWilford Hmm… Not sure. I didn’t even think of doing that test.
Faster then the 5.3 and 2.7 but a bit slower then the 6.2 .
Does anybody care to learn how to seat the piston rings on a new engine ? I was taught this decades ago and it definitely works !
@@scottymoondogjakubin4766 Nothing you need to do anymore. Engines are basically broken in when they leave the factory.
What about REGEN?
@@anthonycervassi1400 Such a non-issue. I did several videos on it with the Silverado LZ0 I had in 2022 into 2023. You don’t even notice it.
awesome thank you for your time
@@anthonycervassi1400 anytime. I did 41 videos on the Silverado LZ0. Grab a bag of popcorn and hit play!! 😂
@@Pickuptrucktalk LOL winter is setting in will do
No ambient light in 2025?
My 2024 Chevy 1500 LZO uses ZERO oil .
Are the seats 100% better than the previous model?
Yes. 4 days of driving and my butt didn't get sore.
That’s good to hear. I had a 2022 Yukon Denali and the seats were hard as hell.
@@stevebennett3356 The change in seat comfort started with the new GMC Acadia and is now making its way throughout the lineup. When I did the GMC Terrain video, the interior designer actually said they worked on making the seats more comfortable. I was shocked and made him repeat what he said. LOL
I wouldn't be showing off my kids if that's how they came out lmao
I love this! Even though I hate how diesels aren't really environmentally friendly and produces many harmful emissions! But the mpg is unbeatable for this size!
That's old school thinking on diesels. Today's diesels are much cleaner and much better for CO2 emissions.
No difflocks (front or rear!!). They are available in Silverado and Sierra and Canyon..etc.
Only 2" lift and big tires; this is not enough to call it Z71.
@1:19 how expensive is the oil change?
It is about $80 at a dealer. That’s what I paid.
Too bad w can’t buy one. GM has the diesel delayed until mid 2025
80k is too much!!! Should be 65k or so
Nice vehicle. Diesels always cost the same or more than gas to operate in the end, so whatever your preference. Save on fuel and pay a big bill later if you keep it for long enough. 6.2 and the 3 liter are both nice engines. Hopefully this obvious, and true, statement doesn't stir the pot right up.
They cost more for maintenance, parts and service. You pay a premium for the engine right off the bat.
@@IrishNew Yeah I know I owned one for 52k miles. Whatever you save it gets recollected and then some. Only a matter of time. Journalists and media always talk about them being cheap to own and run. Talk to any diesel mechanic about that idea lol.
@@peiguy1982 agreed. I work for an Operations dept and have talked to the mechanics that service the many vehicles and they told me Diesel is not cheaper unless your towing everyday, all day.
@@IrishNew Yeah good point heavy towing daily different story. My ecodiesel would do 15 mpg towing vs about 10 mpg with the Hemi. For HD trucks that are designed for daily heavy towing I could see fleet owners coming out ahead a bit. Then again the 10k body off head gasket/injector job pays for an awful lot of gasoline.
Can’t wait to see and hear it deleted
nah. 5.3 or 6.2 liter V8.
Wow
Sooooo what was the real world fuel economy??? With math and not the trip computer
Obviously I didn't do the paper calculation since that would have been very misleading.
@ wait... the paper calculation with a calculator is very misleading compared to the trip computer on the truck ???? You have that backwards my friend.... what was the paper calculation with a calculator for this trip ? Did you do one?
@@tomkeen9421 You missed my point. I did a LOT of idling. That’s why I said that on camera.
I did discuss the fuel economy with the idling comment.
I’ve done paper vs computer calculations for the better part of a decade. It really isn’t that much different FYI anymore. It used to be a big deal. Now it is off by about .5 mpg on most occasions. Really not worth it anymore.
I thought GM was doing away with the 3.0.
Where did you get that idea?
It's a popular engine choice, with great capabilities. At least in the Silverado/Sierra it can tow up to 13,000 lbs or it can get 29 mpg unladen. With the Tahoe/Suburban I think a lot of the capabilities are hindered with the GM choice for the SUV suspension setup.
@@Pickuptrucktalk I had seen a video on it that said it was because of emissions.
@@charliej.2716 someone must have made a bad assumption. GM's Mark Reuss just touted its success at an investor day. It isn't going away anytime soon.
@@99-Zulu Independent rear suspension has its pros and cons. However, what bumper pull camper weighs more than 8k lbs loaded down? And what would you actually tow with the Tahoe at 13k lbs? I've never found a single thing.
Крутая машина
80k. Average Joe cant afford this i am out
just another truck for the rich. or they think there rich
I would get a used Ford Excursion over any brand new full size SUV or I would get a 70s or 80s or 90s used Suburban over a brand new one.
Why?
@Pickuptrucktalk Why not maybe because I look at the vehicles of the past and I like those looks of vehicles.And why is it a problem to go to a used vehicle? I see no problem with going used or pre-owned over a new vehicle I like the Excursion and I like the look of the Square body Chevys and GMCs. And I like the older body styles of vehicles from Ford Ram and the GM twins I see no problem with my comment. I think also a lot of people buy new vehicles not for the right reasons. And that's why a lot of the things in vehicles I dislike and why vehicles are so jacked up in price. And to me a lot of times going used or pre-owned is not a bad thing like people claim it to be. Not everyone needs a new vehicle they just buy a vehicle because they want the next best thing like with phones as well. People have lost touch with wants and needs this is how I live my life and how I was raised. And this is what I believe in maybe you see it differently but I live this what my father taught this and I stand by it.
@@Pickuptrucktalk I'm not trying to be mean if I come off mean my apologies I just think the Excursion is a good vehicle for a family vehicle and the GM twins of Suburban but I like he square body's of the GM trucks from watching the movie Dante's Peak seeing that old school Suburban square body one looks awesome to me vehicles from the past looked so much cooler in my opinion.
@@Pickuptrucktalk I'm 35 years old and for me I find that also to much tech is something that I do not like and for me I rather have some but not over bearing or way too much I like simple and easy and to me sometimes simple is way better then too much tech or having tech that's my opinion.
Tell us you’re broke without telling us you’re broke… the dinosaurs didn’t want to adapt either…
Great vid, but I don't need to see your kids.