They always use the "why do you care so much about such small, insignificant changes?" tactic when people resist their subversive shit. They DO care a lot about it, obviously, that's why they make those changes in the first place, and them using the "why do you care about it?" trick is just pure gaslighting.
@@Dami19XX thats a really good point. They are the ones that cared first by making the change. I think in any argument, using "its insignifigant so don't care" is usually bad faith.
@@invisibleloki26 They always try to downplay stuff and say it's nothing, but when they get the upperhand they'll let their mask slip and taunt you over it. At this point it's integral part of who they are.
I thought a remaster was showing love to a relic in the past while FIXING known bugs and glitches and either adding more content, Texture and graphics Up-Res (depening on the game) and overall just showing love to a past game that many have enjoyed. Not changing things that nobody asked for, Questionable and unnecessary design changes that don't even make any sense, Primarily censors being the majority of it and at other times just a lazy or poor remaster. At that point it's not a remaster it's moving closer to a remake imo. Then if someone speaks up about it they get a bunch of "There's nothing wrong" Or a "It doesn't change anything why are you so worried about it?"
A remaster should just be a straight up port with better performance, better resolution and some quality of life changes. Everything else is usually a bad sign.
The sweet baby logo is on the thumbnail as a way to indicate censorship in general. Sega has been trying to cover up Rouge for a while (and they do also work with sweet baby) but this time it was pretty egregious, even covering up her back and making her wings clip through her dress.
@joaquindiaz3621 They went out of their way to change it compared to how it was in the original release of the game. If that is not a form of censorship I don't know what it is then.
They always use the "why do you care so much about such small, insignificant changes?" tactic when people resist their subversive shit.
They DO care a lot about it, obviously, that's why they make those changes in the first place, and them using the "why do you care about it?" trick is just pure gaslighting.
Gaslighting and deception are their only weapons.
@@Dami19XX thats a really good point. They are the ones that cared first by making the change. I think in any argument, using "its insignifigant so don't care" is usually bad faith.
@@invisibleloki26 They always try to downplay stuff and say it's nothing, but when they get the upperhand they'll let their mask slip and taunt you over it.
At this point it's integral part of who they are.
3:13 lol @ how he's holding the gun... humour like that is extinct in this day and age
That's why I think that game re-released today is a breath of frrsh air, despite its flaws.
Yep its all about control if they dont like something you cant have it, we are adults we can handle it
Sometimes they will even destroy their legacy if it has the wrong fanbase. Lool at what they did with joker 2 or joel in last of us 2.
Exactly i liked Joker 1 but the fact that 2 is a musical is baffling
Being a musical is the least of its problems lol.
I mean i completely lost interest when i heard that, i liked when it was more dark lile the original
I thought a remaster was showing love to a relic in the past while FIXING known bugs and glitches and either adding more content, Texture and graphics Up-Res (depening on the game) and overall just showing love to a past game that many have enjoyed.
Not changing things that nobody asked for, Questionable and unnecessary design changes that don't even make any sense, Primarily censors being the majority of it and at other times just a lazy or poor remaster. At that point it's not a remaster it's moving closer to a remake imo.
Then if someone speaks up about it they get a bunch of "There's nothing wrong" Or a "It doesn't change anything why are you so worried about it?"
A remaster should just be a straight up port with better performance, better resolution and some quality of life changes. Everything else is usually a bad sign.
3:40 rouge had that way before this slmetimes, this isnt Sweet baby stuff on the sonic gens remaster
The sweet baby logo is on the thumbnail as a way to indicate censorship in general. Sega has been trying to cover up Rouge for a while (and they do also work with sweet baby) but this time it was pretty egregious, even covering up her back and making her wings clip through her dress.
We both know you only put the Sweet Baby Inc logo on there for clickbait
You don't need to lie about being a grifter
@hairlessgrizzly559 I'm happy for you that you have an opinion, even if it is the wrong one.
@@Dami19XX .... it still not a case of a rash censorship, this design of rouge with a top that doesn't show her breast are in the animations as well
@joaquindiaz3621 They went out of their way to change it compared to how it was in the original release of the game. If that is not a form of censorship I don't know what it is then.
I really don't care, I just like the game
@@feeplemurphy4618 you can like something overall but still dislike aspects of it.
@@Dami19XX I do like the Amy and Rouge changes though