BALTIC Aquascaphe Blue Gilt Diver! Full Review. Pros and Cons.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 тра 2024
  • The Baltic Aquascaphe ticks all the boxes as a beautifully crafted retro vintage dive watch from a brand that puts design and value above all else.
    But is it good enough to sway me from an Omega Seamaster 300 heritage? Let's find out.
  • Навчання та стиль

КОМЕНТАРІ • 38

  • @NaNByZero
    @NaNByZero Місяць тому +2

    This watch looks gorgeous. Whenever I see it on a watch channel I am tempted to buy one. The only reason I don’t, is the old radium style lume that is never as bright as undyed lume. But one day. . . after a couple of beers. . . I am sure I will do it. 🕐⚙️🍸

    • @perfectwrist23
      @perfectwrist23  Місяць тому +1

      That's exactly what happened to me! They market it so well. Not a fan of the lume. Bgw9 all the way for me. All I would say is the price/ value proposition is there

    • @NaNByZero
      @NaNByZero Місяць тому

      @@perfectwrist23 It definitely is. 👍

    • @stuart150
      @stuart150 Місяць тому +1

      The bad news for you is they do a white lume version....

    • @NaNByZero
      @NaNByZero Місяць тому

      @@stuart150 I know but the white lume version doesn’t look as good as the other one. I don’t want it.

    • @perfectwrist23
      @perfectwrist23  Місяць тому

      Wish I'd known......

  • @MADHIKER777
    @MADHIKER777 Місяць тому +1

    Aquascape is a truly beautiful watch. I love mine on a matching blue leather strap. Your striped NATO also looks great.
    During the day, it looks like a small watch, but at night, the lumed bezel makes it look large!

  • @adk7962
    @adk7962 Місяць тому +1

    They make some beautiful watches. But I don’t think it will replace an aspirational watch. Thanks for the great review!

  • @AJB1702
    @AJB1702 Місяць тому +1

    Lovely watch, mate - the beads of rice bracelet just works so well with Aquascaphes.
    Enjoy it in good health

  • @pennyworth1
    @pennyworth1 Місяць тому +1

    After watching the review I am very tempted to buy one they look beautiful thank you great review

  • @gregalonzo747
    @gregalonzo747 Місяць тому +1

    Thanks for your honesty. It's refreshing. I'm not saying it is not a good piece, l just prefer my Omega.

    • @perfectwrist23
      @perfectwrist23  Місяць тому +1

      Yes.....you simply can't beat the heritage and movement. Which do you have?

    • @gregalonzo747
      @gregalonzo747 Місяць тому +1

      @@perfectwrist23 I have a Sea Master. 👍

    • @perfectwrist23
      @perfectwrist23  Місяць тому

      Can't go wrong. ......I'd have no channel with only one watch tho. 😒

  • @vonkruel
    @vonkruel Місяць тому +1

    Quite an appealing watch IMO. I like the retro style (w/o vintage problems), and that beads of rice bracelet looks good to me. The easy removal & installation of the bracelet is a great thing for sure. I know some would prefer an acrylic crystal and it would be nice to see it offered as an option (even better: include a backup crystal to allay fears). Personally I think sapphire is the compromise that works for me - sacrificing a little of that retro charm for durability. Of course, one can argue that acrylic crystals are _safer_ but personally I've never broken a sapphire crystal. I did read one account from a police officer who wore his Bulova Lunar Pilot on duty for years, and he said he never cracked the (top hat sapphire) crystal. So if he didn't break a crystal, I feel it's something I can practically ignore. Anyway enough of my babble. new sub btw 👍

    • @perfectwrist23
      @perfectwrist23  Місяць тому +1

      Thanks! Think that's summed up well. I have nothing to fear from acrylic crystals. I'm not hard wearing and they're under a cuff much of the time

  • @kobusvanrensburg4092
    @kobusvanrensburg4092 Місяць тому +1

    I've had mine for close to three years now. My only regret is that I bougth it on the rubber, and in hindsight I should have bought the bracelet and strap. The lume is ok, but perfectly fine for a couple of hours.

    • @perfectwrist23
      @perfectwrist23  Місяць тому

      I do think the rubber looks particularly smart and contrasts the dial. I did wonder whether I should have just saved the money and not bother with the bracelet. Interesting to get your view

  • @user-qq8jn5bb4m
    @user-qq8jn5bb4m Місяць тому

    I can´t live with an inaccurate mechanical movement and the servicing costs. To me a watch has to tell the time perfectly and be reliable.

    • @Fahrenheit1407
      @Fahrenheit1407 Місяць тому +2

      So presumably you only have quartz then?

    • @perfectwrist23
      @perfectwrist23  Місяць тому +2

      Nothing keeps time like a smartphone. Its the whole jewel on the wrist, mechanical movement thing

    • @davedominguez646
      @davedominguez646 Місяць тому +1

      I was at watch wind up in SF and missed their counter! Next time.

    • @philspencelayh5464
      @philspencelayh5464 Місяць тому +1

      ​@@Fahrenheit1407Limited to radio controlled only even smartphone's and VHP quartz aren't quite perfect.

    • @philspencelayh5464
      @philspencelayh5464 Місяць тому

      Have you ever paid for a watch service?

  • @alfieakaronaldog
    @alfieakaronaldog Місяць тому

    You cannot save money you don’t have.
    You cannot save the 20% + that any non muppet would get off the real thing.

    • @perfectwrist23
      @perfectwrist23  Місяць тому

      The 20% is the import duty

    • @alfieakaronaldog
      @alfieakaronaldog Місяць тому +1

      @@perfectwrist23 What I meant was that nobody should be paying list for the Omega, so max you would be saving (re your thumbnail) would be £4000.

    • @perfectwrist23
      @perfectwrist23  Місяць тому

      Ah yes. Agreed .Although the current 300 heritage is getting towards £7000 so model dependent

    • @alfieakaronaldog
      @alfieakaronaldog Місяць тому +1

      @@perfectwrist23 so £5k after discount……
      …… you were correct 😉
      I apologise unreservedly!

    • @perfectwrist23
      @perfectwrist23  Місяць тому

      Keep watching. Great banter

  • @peterlandbo2726
    @peterlandbo2726 Місяць тому

    You have saved absolutely nothing as you get what you pay for

    • @perfectwrist23
      @perfectwrist23  Місяць тому +2

      The point is finding the same wrist presence for less, therefore ending the search for, say, the Omega. Not sure about always getting what you pay for really.