ANIMAL | Why criticize Sandeep Reddy Vanga? | WHAT is the reason for its success?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 тра 2024
- #animalmovie #bollywood #cinema #realism #india #indian #society #hindimovie #animalmoviereview #misogyny #feminism
Why do you think Animal and Kabir Singh work in our society? Is Sandeep Reddy Vanga the VILLAIN or is it something else?
Mask Design: SmagaPaperwood
Music by: socialbunnymarketing.com
Subscribe for more cinema and life related topics and discussions!
00:00 - Intro/Topics I will talk about
00:45 - Cinematic Perspective/Comparing Sandeep with Quentin Tarantino
02:00 - Understanding Sandeep's motive behind the film
03:40 - Breaking the Golden Rule of Filmmaking
05:23 - Talking about Misogyny
08:27 - Why audiences liked Animal
10:05 - Understanding Sandeep's ideology/Telugu Industry
12:06 - ANOTHER reason why Animal works
13:39 - Reason why I did not mention Animal in my FIRST video
14:19 - This week's recommendation - Фільми й анімація
i have watched so many video on movie animal including dhruv rathi video, but till now this is the best explanation of the movie animal on youtube.
Thank you for your kind feedback! Subscribe, share and keep supporting! 🙏🏽
Its a story of a man so driven by the validation from his father, he goes beyond his moral transcendence and loses all sight of right and wrong. In the second half we see his transformation from a typical bollywood hero to a full blown Animal, almost as crazy as the villian itself. Didnt get bored even for a minute through 3 hr runtime. I watched the film like a character study and i loved it
only chappri nibbas will love Animal movie
@@ramakrishna9041 that’s how movies are made in Hollywood. Go get some international exposure. Have you not seen wolf of Wall Street, gone girl, 365 days? Tum chapri ho and it proves it 🤣🤣
If you notice, Vanga’s female characters are also flawed and strong. Rashmika adding extra salt in Ranvijay’s food, slapping him multiple times, screaming at him and leaving him at end. Bobby Deol’s wives smoking (which is not common in commercial cinema) and making fun of her husband’s disability and one admitting she is a gold digger
Also brother. Congrats for closing in on 300 subs in such a short span of time. Will you make a subreddit soon?
Thank you! 🙏🏽 and I will once I hit 1K mark. Keep supporting 🙂
@@ReelRealReflect Good luck
Most nuanced discussion on the film i have seen tbh
Thanks for your kind feedback! 🙏🏽
Vanga has the potential to be India's modern Tarantino and he's wasting it by being a crybaby.
He definitely does, a Tarantino equivalent for Indian masses! Maybe too early to say but there is still a difference in profoundness between them.
@@ReelRealReflect i dont think so, vanga is yet to get over cliches and make something 100% orginal like quintin ! He is formulatic and generic tbh
Agreed, that’s why he’s a “potential” equivalent 🙂
I think its not the movie it's the distribution of Indian society ...
Movie tier 1 .. watch it and go back normal
Movie teir 3.. somehow get impressed ... and their inner thoughts matches the character...
Me I can watch brutality blood cuts it excites my inner thoughts ... does that mean I'm really that kind of guy...
But.. the boby character who rape wife and just .
People are Jamal Jamal kr rahe hai
what about spirit???
You have a great future bro. Your channel will be growing soon.
Thank you for your kind words! 🙏🏽
I totally agree that the film story kind of got lost in between and it does not seem like Father Son movie at all as how it was promoted. Though I still loved the movie as I feel shots are very tight, fanstastic music and transitions were good too. But looking from a lense of how it was promoted, it's aine that movie. Though I feel Sandeep is extremely talented and knows his craft, but got a bit lost midway in the story. I do look forward to more from him.
Hi! That’s right. Hopefully we get to see more depth in the characters from him in his upcoming projects.
His direction and editing were great in that movie. There were certain references of hitler too. So I believe he is great in the genre of action and brutality in indian cinema. Complex characters and world building are something I love the most. Film justifies the title too.
You just spoke my mind
Wonderful Remark.. I will definitely watch I Saw The Devil..
Let us know how you like it!
@@ReelRealReflect What a thriller, violent movie and I really hate the villain ( means he's done a wonderful job ) the plot was nice.. he did get scared because his son is going to see him in that condition..
Waiting for more..
During my routine check for new content from the Pop Culture Detective, UA-cam fortunately recommended this video. I thoroughly enjoyed your insightful perspective and well-reasoned arguments. Please continue your excellent work.
Hi! Thanks for your kind comment! Keep supporting 🙏🏽
I agree with you and also disagree on few points but it's intresting keep it up bro I like your thoughts and I subscribe your channel ❤🙏
Appreciate your comment! Keep supporting 🙏🏽
Quality content and soo true
Thank you!🙏🏽
❤❤❤❤
Bhai jyadatar Indian Godfather movie series dekhi Nehi hein isliye Animal movie hit huyi.
Original story ke hisab se kabir Singh better hein Animal se.
What are your thoughts?
For me, if story would have been good, I would have justified all the violence and alpha male thing but the story was a meh!
the best thing about the movie was the music.
@@Helium_z2 Agreed! It had the potential but fell short
Bhediya bro has more nuanced videos on films than any other youtuber I have seen to this point .
Thank you for your kind comment! Stay tuned for more! 🙂
@@ReelRealReflect sure brother and would spread the word in another cinephiles as well.
Well I personally don't even understand the point of so much controversies surrounding a single movie. Movie dekho, enjoy karo ghar jao that's my formula but now that when it's happening, I'd like to put my two cents too. Well, many of the critics who have criticised Animal movie so much have openly called for banning that film while movies like Thank You For Coming, Four More Shots Please and many others have received rave reviews from these critics only which is so wrong because they show and advocate pseudo-feminism openly. I didn't see any female critic appreciating the movie for its incredible screenplay, range of acting performances, the awesome music, effective use of background score etc etc. Rather, they're busy in naming and publicly shaming this movie and its director Sandeep Vanga. It feels sad to see this hypocrisy. Movies are the reflections of the society and nothing else. As an English Literature Hons student, who's reading so many different kinds of dramas, one drama which stands out is William Shakespeare's Hamlet wherein Hamlet the prince is said to have treated Ophelia like his prized possession and lot of people have criticised Shakespeare for that but why did Shakespeare, who's such a genius playwright, actually wrote that scene???? Only because it was happening in real life medieval 15th century Europe. If we see clearly, the whole character trait of Ranvijay has been shown and written in a way to portray that NEVER BECOME SOMEONE LIKE HIM. Ranvijay is a cheater, he's a psychopath and a violent man and all that Vanga has shown is to portray to us that he's a bad figure. People in India unfortunately are too naive to understand that a movie with two negative characters can also be written. Some are saying, Ranvijay didn't suffer enough. Why??? Only because he didn't die. Well don't you think his wife and his kids leaving him is what makes him suffer far more than him actually dying???? He could've died a hero's death but he's shown to be suffering through his life coz his loved ones have forsaken him. One other important thing to note is that, what Rashmika's character did with her real fiancee. If what Ranvijay has done is wrong then why aren't they criticising Rashmika's character for leaving and cheating on her fiancee like that???? Isn't that also wrong?? Lastly, I'd just like to say, just because some misogynistic men exist in our society, it shouldn't happen that movies should not be made. That will be outright undemocratic. If movies like Thank You For Coming can release then so can a movie like Animal who's craft is actually far more formidable than the former one. Movies show our society and there's no need to create any controversies around it. If you become a gangster by seeing a Tarantino film then the problem is in YOUR mentality and NOT Tarantino who's made the film!!
Hi! Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Totally agreed, in a democracy there should be freedom to be able to make any kind of art. The film does reflect the current environment of our society. I believe while Rannvijay’s character got what he deserved in the end, his glorification may have overshadowed it. Rashmika’s character was problematic as well, critics should point out that as well when they do a review. Four More Shots Please and Thank You for Coming are equally misleading, and should be viewed carefully.
Each and every word u said is correct. 😌I have seen some dark movies with complex characters. Very few of them earned that amount of box office numbers unlike Kabir singh and animal. Anurag kashyap has more brutality that vanga. Film like Raman raghav 2.0,gangs of wasseypur , no smoking etc all are cult classics but never earned the fat some of money. So glad that animal and Kabir singh atleast earned that
I think the reason why the dad son bond wasn't shown much or why the resolution didn't happen was because... well...that bond just didn't exist.
He was absent most of the times. The only times we see them in a frame, they're arguing and the father ends up resorting to some form of violence.
And, it was rigged from the beginning. There was no resolution, no positive development for them. Just Kafkaesque: an undending suffering that results in no form of reward in the end. And, that's why they say "Agli Janam me mein papa aur aap beta". Because they're 100% on the fact that they won't be able to fix their differences in this lifetime.
I know people have been saying that the father son sequence are less or not well developed. And, I used to agree before I interpreted the film in this way, making all the scenes they provided with the dad-son together... sufficient. (fOr mE🤓)
Idk if it was intentional by Sandeep sir or not.
But if it is. That's a pretty well done move in my books.
That’s an interesting interpretation! However, I doubt Sandeep intended this because I believe if he did he would have surely mentioned it in the movie breakdown interview that he did.
@@ReelRealReflect yeah, fair enough
Rashmika’s character was written strongly in Animal, she wasnt just eye candy. She slapped Ranvijay multiple times, called him out on his actions and left him at the end. Totally disagree with your point
Eye candy, glamour doll word sirf indian media m use hota h mene kabhi western critic's ko ye word use karte huye nhi dekha h😂
This movie was not story driven. Its character driven. Its the psyche and unpredictable nature of the character you have to watch
That is an interesting take! Something like The Taxi Driver comes to mind when a movie is character driven, maybe we can see more of that in the next installment of Animal.
12:04 the people in so-called developed and progressive countries like america had loved animal so much that many of the film's tickets were sold in black
SANDEEP VANGA DID NOT GLORIFIED RANVIJAY BALBIR
Telugu film industry me bhi kuch acchi filme bani hai jinnme women empowerment ko bhi dikhaya gaya hai jaise ki Arundhathi, Rudramadevi, Bahubali: The Conclusion. Pehele thik se study kariye telugu film industry ke baare me.
Your feedback is appreciated! However, there are always exceptions to the rule, but it does not invalidate the generality of a situation.
Agar Animal jaisi movies society ke liye dangerous hai toh kya bollywood me jo Chakravyuh, Haider, Ek ladki ko dekha toh aisa laga, Gangubai Kathiawaadi, Thank you for Coming jaisi filme bani hai kya woh society ke liye dangerous nahi hai ? Unn filmo par koi baat kyu nahi karta ?
Agreed. If there are elements that are wrong irrespective of the gender then they should be pointed out. I have mentioned Thank You for Coming in the video, I don’t think it is right either.
I do not agree on your point art is subjective in nature. It is only your opinion you can not force on audience how they like to watch anything. It is violent but some people like it. It is just a film watch it like a film and leave it. Get back to the real world.
"Lick my shoe" wale scene mei jab zoya kehti hai ki mai aapke liye kuch bhi kar sakti hu, tab jaake ranvijay colloquially kehta hai "lick my shoe" aur uske baad wo waha se chala jaata hai! Agar wo literally bolta to wo sach mei joote chatwaata!! Usne colloquially kaha thaa
People are encouraging misogynistic characters more as the box office collection of kabir singh and animal are too high. So we cant say that north indian audience are not backward. They love violence, gore and brutality. Its truth. U can write a lot of things in social media but u cant ddny this fact.
Maybe the film made huge box office numbers simply because people wanted to witness what the hype was really about and ended up not liking it? Regardless, Sandeep did strike the right chord with film elements so catchy that it created a dichotomy of the film watching masses
another fabulous video
Thank you 🙏🏽
its more of a misandrist movie than misogyny and whatever happens in this movie was little bit no misogyny and in India males and trans-sex are more time the victim of sexual crimes than female because we do have a relevant government authority to find and show data on this but it still does happens more often than you expect
Hi! Appreciate your comment, and would love to know more about the misandrist angle. Could you please explain in detail, it would be a nice take on the movie!
@@ReelRealReflectlet me enlighten you by physically assaulting her husband, cheating on her fiance but yet people only saw bad in ranvijay. That's what misandrist is normalising assaulting men . Remember when in ka ir Singh did this thing how much big issue it becomes
Totally agreed!
It is actually weird to see people defend this movie as if their life depends on it.
Arjun reddy was criticized constructively in telugu belt! And towards the end preethi had confronted arjun for his rude behaviour during the entire slap wala episode! Arjun was confronted for his arrogance by preethi and was criticised for his anger and impatience by his friend shiva!! And dumb reviewers like you just formed half opinions on that slap wala scene and didn't even care to watch the entire film! Secondly ranvijay from animal had colloquially asked zoya to lick his shoe in response to her words "mai aapse boht pyaar karti hu, mai aapke liye kuch bhi kar sakti hu" . He did not say that thing literally he had said that colloquially in a same manner as the abusive words were used in "MIRZAPUR".
And most importantly sandeep reddy vanga doesn't endorse or promote rape rather he is strongly against it, that is why in all 3 of his films there are scenes where molestors are getting brutally beaten. Like in arjun reddy/kabir singh:- the lead character beats the shit out of his lover's molestor and in animal:- the lead character hits the molestors with his car, so you just cannot equate ranvijay's character with that of the barbaric rapists of nirbhaya
Hi! Thank you for your thoughts on the video. I have merely stated the difference in the comments by the two individuals with regards to the elements in the film. I never mentioned Sandeep endorses rape culture, I provided a reference to the barbaric rapists as a symbol of men with a backward mindset. You could see Mukesh Singh's(Nirbhaya's perpetrator) interview to know what I intended to convey and it would not be right to deny that there are still men with a regressive thinking in our society. Also, because the female characters are toxic does not make it just for men to be the same, either behaviors should be condemned and I have mentioned this further in the video as well.
I believe we should adhere to healthy debates without being emotional, for a constructive mindset. We could agree to disagree without having the need to blurt out insults.
@@ReelRealReflect the point I want to make is, both the things:- the abuses in mirzapur and ranvijay telling zoya to lick his shoe were colloquial,
and secondly, ranvijay was not as regressive as those rapists of nirbhaya ji, a man just preaching other men around him to embrace their manhood(which ranvijay did) is not being regressive and neither does that thing promote rape!
Rapists are regressive but those alpha males who embrace their manhood and protect their loved ones around them are not regressive,
The fact that one is embracing manhood cannot be appropriated as a reason for the rapist mentality! Rather it will be the same alpha males who would punish the rapists badly.
So, neither ranvijay's preachings be considered as regressive and nor can that mindset of him be equated to those of regressive rapists
@@ReelRealReflect and the thing which i wanted to clarify was that, when preethi had confronted arjun towards the end the of film, she was not exhibiting toxic behaviour, rather she was telling arjun the misdeeds he did during the slap wala episode, and was making him realise his mistakes. So I am not advocating that preethi's behaviour gives a reason for arjun to be toxic, and neither do I support arjun's actions during that slap wala episode
Bro Just Imagine your name is You and my name is Me Who is Fool you or me?
Haha funny
Hollywood has way more toxic and misognystic films. Wolf of wall street, 365 days, gone girl, fifty shades of grey, game of thrones, The Boys. These films and series are 100x worse than Animal. Sorry very biased video
In Kabir Singh there is a scene where Preeti forces Ksbir Singh to kiss her against his consent. She is also flawed in a way. She does have a stance in the movie. Thats why she also leaves Kabir until he finds her 9 months later. Sorry i find this video very biased
Brother I like your content, but here i don't agree with you.
Hi! Appreciate you stating it, the very objective of me making videos is having a healthy debate. Which part do you specifically not agree with?
Tu jammi pants ka koi rishtedaar hai... Ya bichda hua bhai😂
Itna clarity hai thoughts mein...tau... bina mask pehne vlogs karo bhai🤗
Hi! Thanks for the kind comment, appreciate it! I like Jammy’s work, but not in any way related to him. Maybe some day I will reveal 🙂 stay tuned