@@superracer5567 a: he does not suck r: people holding babies generally don't suck e: historical evidence shows that men holding babies are usually the father, most fathers are not gay and thus do not suck i: look me in the eye when I say this; if you are looking for people who suck, you're gonna have a bad time finding such a person if you target men holding babies who are most often not gay, I suggest you to visit a gay club where I guarantee you that you will find at least one man who is willing to suck.
Now I’m definitely late to the party here but I don’t think the example given in this video is actually very good. Here’s why: the statement given says that (assertion) children enjoy learning at academies *because* (reason) academies have a positive effect on their education. While that’s a fine premise to go on, the evidence must demonstrate a causal relationship between the two; it must show that children enjoy academies *for the reason that* they have a positive effect on their education. This is not the case in the example given. The evidence states that 69% of children were satisfied with their classes (not that they enjoyed them) *and* (not because) 73.9% of children thought that academies had a positive effect on grades and abilities. I could also point out that using a 2007 study from Korea also suggests cherry-picked evidence, however that seems nitpicky and is highly context dependent. The main failing of this argument is that it essentially is two assertions followed by evidence of those assertions, following a format more akin to A-A-E-E (Not very pirate like). Identifying a causal relationship is a very powerful statement in a debate, but it must be supported by evidence that proves that relationship.
I usually debate by asking questions. If you do it right you can be completely wrong with no facts and still win the argument. (or atleast look like you did)
Actually I also did the same when we had a group debate in our class and I was not aware of it as I was absent, although I could not get an opportunity to keep my point because when my group members had already discussed what each one would say but I came in the last moment and that was the first time I was participating in a debate and I wasn't prepared also , first I heard to all the points my group members said and those who we're against as well and to then I ended up questioning my opposite team otherwise I wouldn't have got marks.
invalid evidence. the face that children were satisfied with their classes doesnt mean there is a positive effect on education but only means that they felt happy.The evidence to prove the assertion should be some surveys about their results in exams or levels of skills that they learnt in academies.
Good explanation. Goes without saying keep arguments simple and clear, with the process logical and efficient. Impact must something judge will remember and indentify with.
I am a judge. I would appreciate any ideas as to how to be a better judge of middle school debate. All of the kids are great for being there. How can I be of greatest benefit to their development.
Few pointers. First, CWI is probably a better card format than AREI but whatever works for you. Second, eye contact isn't really important. Third, most impacts should relate to extinction or value to life decreasing.
Claim-Warrant-Impact. Claim is the same as assertion (What they should believe) Warrant - Pretty much the same as reason and evidence combined (Why they should believe it) Impact - The impact on the audience (Why they should care) So, for example you might claim that libraries help kids learn. The warrant might be that studies have shown that kids who visit libraries achieve greater results in academic tests, and that increased reading is good for kids. The impact would be that this would help you, the audience, by increasing the average education of the populace leading to better doctors, better politicians, etc, and that the audience' children would have a better education if taken to libraries. A good argument should have all of these. Often people take an ethical argument and forget to apply a warrant, or a data-based argument and forget to connect it to the audience. I've also seen CWA with impact being replaced by Application (same meaning) and CRI (replacing warrant with reason, but having the same meaning).
In the debating competitions I coach for you will lose points if you don't engage your audience with eye contact, because the audience is less likely to listen to your argument if you don't make eye contact.
Sorry for the late reply..how was the debate? For future reference, the introduction shouldn't be too long as most debates are timed and the arguments are usually more valuble than the introduction. Would you like me to make another debate video?
its either shut them up and get the last word,or just shut up ourselves and walk away and know we are "right".Pride keeps us moving for a last word however.
Hi, I made another argument. Could you please check if it's alright? Thanks:D Assertion: Children develop social skills. Reason: Academies help in public speaking and boosting confidence. Evidence: Study shows that helping children develop social and emotional skills is one of the most important things we can do to prepare them for a healthy future. From an early age, these skills determine whether a child goes to college or prison, and whether they end up unemployed or addicted. Impact: My argument is.... This means that children tend to develop social skills in an academy. Academies help children to get ready for the future and bring changes in their life in positive ways.
Great argument, but perhaps you need evidence that is more specific to academies providing the public speaking and confidence boost. The studies are correct, but there is no link to academies.
Thanks for the comment^^ The impact is a part of the argument that helps you show the importance of the argument. think of it as the "so what?" part, explaining the severity of the argument. There are different ways to calculate the impact such as how big it is (financial collapse, war), timeframe (when it will happen), and probability (how likely is it to happen). Impacts allow the judge to evaluate which arguments are the strongest in the debate. I hope this helps some, if you have more questions feel free to comment or send me an email: contact@readingpioneers.com
That's a good question, but I would guess your style of debate doesn't allow for evidence to be used. You may have to rely on factual information and logic to prove your ideas. Thanks for the comment and hope this helps~
I know it's just an example but a study that asks children how satisfied they are with their education isn't trustworthy. A good study would look at results, not ask a person if they are satisfied especially because most kids don't know squat about what kind of education and how much of it is good for them. My proof? Gender studies.
*sigh* Video games don't make kids more violent. That's something someone thought of but didn't get any evidence, and most people who heard it just believed it at face value. Many studies have been conducted regarding the hypothesis, most if not all of them proved that the notion is false.
Please dont tell me i'm the only one here that watch this video bc i'm into the"ace attorney:phoenix wright"fandom and wanting to become like the cool protag who is a cool lawyer and handleling murder case in the anime/game (I know this is a super super higly stupid reason ahhaa)
I wanted to take your video seriously until I saw "studies show violent video games...". The studies actually show they can help reduce violence in kids, being a more "appropriate" means of releasing ones anger.
Thank you for the comment, but a debate usually starts on the PRO side because they have to present the topic and support it. If the debate starts on the negative side, you would still give a normal speech, just arguments are for the CON not the PRO. I hope this helps~
If you’re looking somewhere to sharpen your debate pen fordebating.com is the place to hone your debating skill. Unlike forums, Facebook or wherever it’s structured! It’s just you and your opponent (1v1 and 2v2) locked in for 2-6 to rounds. (rather than going on infinitely with random people jumping into the middle of the debate) It's a cage match for your brain!
I wished to see this videofrom 1 week ago, because in my english class, we try to made a debate but was an horriblefail, and the teacher try to help us, but we couldn´t to understand, that is a good video, for learn how to preparefor have a debate, thanks,for the leccion I will takeall your hacks forthe next debate. How more is here for the teacher from IPOI65 .______.
arguing all children like academies because of a study done by a university from Korea fails to consider cultural factors. Using narrow facts to support a broad argument is not a good argument. ***Mic Drop*** And that's how you discredit a bad argument.
Who else is watching this beforr a debate competition
Meeee 😂😂
Omg I am so nervous I'm in the car going to a debate tournament
@@McGrey450 It's gonna be alright, I have experienced, best of luck bro
Me
sama ali omg me toooo
You'd think it's "R," but everyone knows a pirate's true love is always the "C."
You suck
scurvy haha
CrabbyO R is the first predicted response. C is the only other option. A metaphor for preparing for the top 2 responses for a proposed point of view?
Good one
@@superracer5567
a: he does not suck
r: people holding babies generally don't suck
e: historical evidence shows that men holding babies are usually the father, most fathers are not gay and thus do not suck
i: look me in the eye when I say this; if you are looking for people who suck, you're gonna have a bad time finding such a person if you target men holding babies who are most often not gay, I suggest you to visit a gay club where I guarantee you that you will find at least one man who is willing to suck.
put it to speed 1.25...better
soooo many.... unnecessary ..... pauses
×2 if you want Ben Shapiro experience
Yea your right
@@katherineforero4883 LMAo
Thank you.... 😃
Who else is watching this because their teacher sent it to them- like the coment
let's be honest, that's the reason for 99% of views of learning videos on internet.
Channels are really bringing in big buks thanks to high school teachers!
Meeee
me too
thanks much! quite helpful. got a debate to prep and honestly, it felt overwhelming for a minute. thanks again for this lesson. be well.
Thanks for the comment^^ If you need more help, just send me a message. Hope you do well~
who else is watching bc their teacher sent it to them to prep for an upcoming debate?just me?ok
Wow did your teacher really send this link??
@WetBoyWest Wow, I had no idea~!
Helo
Same
Bro this is why I’m watching this oof
I am watching this before debate competition thanks!!
Ashmin Gill hope it went well.
Now I’m definitely late to the party here but I don’t think the example given in this video is actually very good. Here’s why: the statement given says that (assertion) children enjoy learning at academies *because* (reason) academies have a positive effect on their education.
While that’s a fine premise to go on, the evidence must demonstrate a causal relationship between the two; it must show that children enjoy academies *for the reason that* they have a positive effect on their education. This is not the case in the example given.
The evidence states that 69% of children were satisfied with their classes (not that they enjoyed them) *and* (not because) 73.9% of children thought that academies had a positive effect on grades and abilities. I could also point out that using a 2007 study from Korea also suggests cherry-picked evidence, however that seems nitpicky and is highly context dependent.
The main failing of this argument is that it essentially is two assertions followed by evidence of those assertions, following a format more akin to A-A-E-E (Not very pirate like). Identifying a causal relationship is a very powerful statement in a debate, but it must be supported by evidence that proves that relationship.
IveGotWheels could you please give the example the right one?
Now for the rebuttle...., anyone? 😂👍
Wow u people were literally having a right here
I usually debate by asking questions. If you do it right you can be completely wrong with no facts and still win the argument. (or atleast look like you did)
Yep. Thats a good tactic. Looking like you won (especially to an audience) can be just as good as actually winning. Usually is, in my experience haha
I don't understand. How do you do this
Socratic method?
@@likesmusic11 Aw yeah baby! Gotta love that Socrates doe
Actually I also did the same when we had a group debate in our class and I was not aware of it as I was absent, although I could not get an opportunity to keep my point because when my group members had already discussed what each one would say but I came in the last moment and that was the first time I was participating in a debate and I wasn't prepared also , first I heard to all the points my group members said and those who we're against as well and to then I ended up questioning my opposite team otherwise I wouldn't have got marks.
Great video, Remembering the good days we prepared for debates!
Thank you~
Am I the only introvert searc hing ways to improve social ability
You're not alone^^
This helps, I will be debating tomorrow. Wish me luck.
It’s been 2 years but good luck
How's your debate?
@@iron_water-f1l lol
i really liked the way it was contextualised. i hope to shine in a debate!
This video helps a lot... It's my first time (seriously) standing for my group.. bc I'm not the "confident type" of person. Good luck to me lol
Sometimes it takes a little acting to "look" confident^^ I hope you did well~ Thank you
Me too first time debating
invalid evidence.
the face that children were satisfied with their classes doesnt mean there is a positive effect on education but only means that they felt happy.The evidence to prove the assertion should be some surveys about their results in exams or levels of skills that they learnt in academies.
Totally agree with you
Your perspective is very helpful
The reason stated is an assertion init of itself, no?
Chandler Bing the point of video is about argument building technique not the content. he is just using studying in academy as an example.
james dig yeah it's example... and example doesn't have to be perfect...
Good explanation. Goes without saying keep arguments simple and clear, with the process logical and efficient. Impact must something judge will remember and indentify with.
I am at the international debate competition wish me luck
Good Luck!!
How did you do?
Bishnu Sha
rma
6:55 Drumroll with tongue ⚰️⚰️⚰️⚰️⚰️ i laughed too hard
Thanks, hahaha
Channels do be bringing in views thanks to these teachers.
Great job! thanks for helping the researchers to understand the argumentation building
Glad you enjoyed it!
I am a judge. I would appreciate any ideas as to how to be a better judge of middle school debate. All of the kids are great for being there. How can I be of greatest benefit to their development.
Watching this to prepare my next tourament!
Hope you did well!
I came here because my teacher picks me in a debate competition like what the hell
*This is some great stuff here, glad I came by!* ✌😁
thank you for watching and the comment~
@@ReadingPioneers📗 😎
I'm watching this before my debate tournament.......
Thank you so much. I found this video amazing, informative and I apply it practically.. Love and peace.
It's very interesting and teaching.
I really thank you I passed my English exam cause of u ;v;
Me and my friend luv ur channel c:
Happy to help!
Few pointers. First, CWI is probably a better card format than AREI but whatever works for you. Second, eye contact isn't really important. Third, most impacts should relate to extinction or value to life decreasing.
Lucas Hunter what’s cwi?
Whatta hell is CWI MR.
Claim-Warrant-Impact.
Claim is the same as assertion (What they should believe)
Warrant - Pretty much the same as reason and evidence combined (Why they should believe it)
Impact - The impact on the audience (Why they should care)
So, for example you might claim that libraries help kids learn.
The warrant might be that studies have shown that kids who visit libraries achieve greater results in academic tests, and that increased reading is good for kids.
The impact would be that this would help you, the audience, by increasing the average education of the populace leading to better doctors, better politicians, etc, and that the audience' children would have a better education if taken to libraries.
A good argument should have all of these. Often people take an ethical argument and forget to apply a warrant, or a data-based argument and forget to connect it to the audience.
I've also seen CWA with impact being replaced by Application (same meaning) and CRI (replacing warrant with reason, but having the same meaning).
In the debating competitions I coach for you will lose points if you don't engage your audience with eye contact, because the audience is less likely to listen to your argument if you don't make eye contact.
@@Panic_Pickle Gonna CRI?…. 😢
It's interesting and Educative.
Thank you so much for your kind words~
GOD JOB WITH THIS USEFUL TIPS, I CAN WRITE A BETTER ARGUMENT
I'm glad I could help^^ Thank you~
The problem with is evidense is that it doesnt give context. what if public school kids enjoy school even more.
Thanks, May God Bless youu
Thank you so much~ You too^^
Whats the soundtrack used in this video?
very useful.
hope I apply in real life conversation or while give Lecture. Thanks....
This video is very effective 👌
Thank you so much for the comment and feedback~
thanks a lot. i was wodering is it possible for me to get the soft file of the slide
What do you call that wooden structure that has mic attached, where you stand behind, and speak right through it?
Podium?
Good video,I learn a lot
Glad to help~
I have a debate tomorrow should i make the introduction long
Sorry for the late reply..how was the debate? For future reference, the introduction shouldn't be too long as most debates are timed and the arguments are usually more valuble than the introduction. Would you like me to make another debate video?
@@ReadingPioneers it was so good better than i thought we managed to fix the references we used Harvard system it seemed that we passed
@@Blackrose01330 Congrats!
its either shut them up and get the last word,or just shut up ourselves and walk away and know we are "right".Pride keeps us moving for a last word however.
Who's here bc of their teacher?
Wow really???
I have debate tomorrow! Wish me luck
Good luck~
Hi, I made another argument. Could you please check if it's alright? Thanks:D
Assertion: Children develop social skills.
Reason: Academies help in public speaking and boosting confidence.
Evidence: Study shows that helping children develop social and emotional skills is one of the most important things we can do to prepare them for a healthy future. From an early age, these skills determine whether a child goes to college or prison, and whether they end up unemployed or addicted.
Impact: My argument is.... This means that children tend to develop social skills in an academy. Academies help children to get ready for the future and bring changes in their life in positive ways.
Great argument, but perhaps you need evidence that is more specific to academies providing the public speaking and confidence boost. The studies are correct, but there is no link to academies.
@@ReadingPioneers ok thanks!😊
Yes, a pirate says " argh "
But, what letter does that start with 👀
R? Like from the alphabet^^
@@ReadingPioneers no it starts with " A " Dummy 🤣
Argh!
Thar she Blows!
They love the letter A
Can you explain me more about impact
Thanks for the comment^^ The impact is a part of the argument that helps you show the importance of the argument. think of it as the "so what?" part, explaining the severity of the argument. There are different ways to calculate the impact such as how big it is (financial collapse, war), timeframe (when it will happen), and probability (how likely is it to happen). Impacts allow the judge to evaluate which arguments are the strongest in the debate. I hope this helps some, if you have more questions feel free to comment or send me an email: contact@readingpioneers.com
I have a debate tomorow! Wish me luck!
Hope you lost!
@@animalswithrohinth HEY!
Easy to understand material. Thanks u. Funny with animated pictures:"
Thank you, I'm so glad you liked it~
Thank you ❤
You're welcome 😊
But how are we supposed to research evidence like that if we are literally in the prep room for a debate with only a dictionary and palm cards?
That's a good question, but I would guess your style of debate doesn't allow for evidence to be used. You may have to rely on factual information and logic to prove your ideas. Thanks for the comment and hope this helps~
Hi sir can I ask something for clarification?
How can I help you?
Thanks for the video i love it
I'm glad you like it! Let me know if there are other debate videos you'd like to see on this channel~
it's really a good video and I learnt from it new points.
Looking for copper and found gold 😊
Wow, haha thank you^^
sir I have debate on academics vs cocurricular activities...need it help
Interesting. Go on!
Who else is watching this to learn how to own UA-cam arguments?
Unfortunately, not all UA-cam arguments use logic and reasoning haha
I know it's just an example but a study that asks children how satisfied they are with their education isn't trustworthy. A good study would look at results, not ask a person if they are satisfied especially because most kids don't know squat about what kind of education and how much of it is good for them. My proof? Gender studies.
Wow! this was amazingly mind blowing....gracias.
Lol i got 2nd in national school debating championship by watching ths
very good and animated .. pls make more on more topics
I have a debate tomorrow.
I hope this works!
Good luck, how did it go?
Amazing! Thx so much!
*sigh* Video games don't make kids more violent. That's something someone thought of but didn't get any evidence, and most people who heard it just believed it at face value. Many studies have been conducted regarding the hypothesis, most if not all of them proved that the notion is false.
Very true and well said!
Very nice
Thank you~
Thank you I learn a lot from your video, sample exceplin
Glad to hear that!
I like this vedio clip, it wil be very helpful to understand what arguments are.
Thank you
You're welcome~
I love the anime in this video it also teaches me a lot
Start at 1:12
Good idea!
thanks for giving such wonderful information boss
Am just learning this because I wanna become a defense lawyer
I hope you can achieve your dream~
@@ReadingPioneers thank you
Bob Duncan approves this video
Thank you Bob Duncan~
This march 4th there would be a debate on a school level wish me luck 😂
Good luck! Do you need any help with preparing ideas/arguments? Thank you for the comment^^
Thanks sir 👍
You're welcome~ Thanks for the support!
infact, I love this video.
Very difficult to follow with the unnecessary background music
Thanks for the input, it's difficult when to add music and when it's okay to hear my(potentially more annoying) voice.
thanx i enjoyed it really helped
I'm glad it was helpful^^ Thank you for the comment~
Who has a debate competition. I also have a competition on my channel 🙂😞
Good video
Thank You~~
please make more debating videos!!
What type of debate videos would you like? I'm running out of ideas
Please dont tell me i'm the only one here that watch this video bc i'm into the"ace attorney:phoenix wright"fandom and wanting to become like the cool protag who is a cool lawyer and handleling murder case in the anime/game
(I know this is a super super higly stupid reason ahhaa)
I've never been compared to an anime/game before^^ Thanks, I'm sure you're not the only one~
dude you're the only one
@@ParadymShiftVegan i'm crying
I was expecting the second argument at the end
Sorry, I didn't want the video to drag on too long. What other debate videos would you be interested in?
@@ReadingPioneers Well, maybe things like how you research for strong points or something?
@@animalswithrohinth maybe this will help: ua-cam.com/video/56NSYykjZ9Q/v-deo.html
@@ReadingPioneers cool, thanks
really good
Thank you so much for the support^^
Wonderful
Thank you~ If you have other debate suggestions please let me know^^
@@ReadingPioneers Of course, I'll tell next time.
I know that joke from Cameron Boyce
I miss that kid. Thank you for the comment^^
@@ReadingPioneers he was wonderful
I wanted to take your video seriously until I saw "studies show violent video games...". The studies actually show they can help reduce violence in kids, being a more "appropriate" means of releasing ones anger.
Brilliant tips!
Those who is watching this video before debeat competition (for intro)
Hit the like
Good luck with your competition!
thanks this is great.
How to start the debate for negative side
Thank you for the comment, but a debate usually starts on the PRO side because they have to present the topic and support it. If the debate starts on the negative side, you would still give a normal speech, just arguments are for the CON not the PRO. I hope this helps~
@@ReadingPioneers I deeply thank to you ♥️😊
YIKES!
Did anyone else too think the answer was X?
no
Who's watching after lolsing an argument with their girlfriend😂
No girlfriend, no lost argument? haha
Thanks for the comment~
@@ReadingPioneers 😂😂😂😂😂
Yh I learned a lot from this
it s R
debatable^^
If you’re looking somewhere to sharpen your debate pen fordebating.com is the place to hone your debating skill. Unlike forums, Facebook or wherever it’s structured! It’s just you and your opponent (1v1 and 2v2) locked in for 2-6 to rounds. (rather than going on infinitely with random people jumping into the middle of the debate) It's a cage match for your brain!
I wished to see this videofrom 1 week ago, because in my english class, we try to made a debate but was an horriblefail, and the teacher try to help us, but we couldn´t to understand, that is a good video, for learn how to preparefor have a debate, thanks,for the leccion I will takeall your hacks forthe next debate.
How more is here for the teacher from IPOI65 .______.
Thank you for the comment, I will try to add more debate videos to help out. But, if you need more help, feel free to message~
arguing all children like academies because of a study done by a university from Korea fails to consider cultural factors. Using narrow facts to support a broad argument is not a good argument. ***Mic Drop*** And that's how you discredit a bad argument.
Wow never heard that pirate joke before.... *eyeroll*
I've got more, don't worry haha Thank you for the comment~
Thanks bro