Bangladesh order VT5 for Bangladesh Army... I think it's best choice of bangladesh... Bangladesh Also choose J10C Fighter jet for Bangladesh Air Force... Long live Bangladesh China Friendship..❤️
is there any source on J10C order????? it seems more logical to purchase JF17 since they are cheaper and very capable, especially the block III model with AESA radar and super long range BVR missiles. and do we have the expected delivery time for vt5?? thx 😁
@@timothy1949 Jf 17 dont even stand a chance as it is a joint venture of China and Pakistan.So permission is needed from both countries.Some of It’s parts are built in China, others are in Pakistan... So it becomes very difficult for maintainance...and the engine is built in Russia and the Ruskies dont have good timing. So jf 17 are not on the bucket list....
From Thailand . Thai Army uses the tank model MBT3000 or VT4 .Have passed the tests well The Tank is suitable for terrain to be used for national defense.
US doesn't use M1A1 anymore, they use M1A2, and 66kmh is official number, in reality it can go much, much faster, past 100 kmh, and when the limit that's put on to preserve engine and transmission is off, it can go over 130 kmh
If Active Protection System can be installed, it could be better deployed. Most armies need an all round battletank (MBT), and needs them in the hundreds for economy of scale for maintainence reasons. It'll be a great morale booster in any war
The comment squad of course, it’s a light tank. It’s made for less accessible areas where it is more likely that someone comes from the back, like in small roads in valleys with bridges for example.
@@tomservo5007 pls, research their weight & class. Abrams is MBT/heavy, this one is light-medium. Abrams can fight T-72 easily, but cannot be deployed in Himalayan highlands Bangladesh rice fields, Russian mud field, or Vietnam jungle
mini AMX-56 -Leclerc , light tank with 105mm rifled gun , I think the chinese designed it to the fighting in the mountain area and thus it is directed to counter indian army , but depending on the how the ammo types and advancement I think it could be very capable tank destroyer beside its suitable to fight the Donkey americans IAV Stryker where both armed with 105 mm rifled gun and both platform could play the same role on the battlefield where the Stryker for being wheeled platform could be more agile and employed as an advance heavy but it lacks the ppropriate armor and comes with high profile and big cross section ( to counter the IED ) and thus its offer a very recognizable target on the battlefield , although I think the fire power tend in favour of the Donkey americans platform due to the Donkey americans long history in designing , producing and operating 105 mm , but with smaller profile and hunter-killer capability for the VT5 it could sweep the battlefield from the Donkey americans IAV Stryker , the Chinese could supply this tank with depleted uranium ( DU ) APFSDS kinetic energy rounds this would enhance drastically the penetration capability of the 105mm rifled gunand increas the target defeat probability . regarding the gun launched ATGM although the tank possess the capabilities to fire the ATGM through its barrel but In general from my very humble knowledge , in the tanks with the 105mm they traded the power of the higher caliber 120mm /125 mm , with the enhancing the effective engagement range and increasing the accuracy of the smaller caliber rifled gun standard rounds , beside practically the launching of ATGM from rifled barrel will lead to rapid corrosion of the barrel rifling only if our Chinese friends came with very special metal or they treat the barrel with a chemical or add metal that increase the life expectancy of the barrel with the rapid firing of ATGM , but bare in mind the L7 gun 105 mm of the english Centurion tank effective combat range is 4000 meter with the HESH round while the GLATGM HEAT have effective combat range of 4000 m ( with modern Belgium / Ukrainian gun launched 105 mm ATGM goes for 5000 m , while For the zionist entity lahat ATGM , have an effective range of 8,000m, which gives this guided missile an qualitative advantages in anti- targets roles ( ground / air mainly low flying aerial objects ) . and both HESH / HEAT& ATGM categorized as chemical munitions ( explosive payloads ), despite the fact that both are radically different in terms of designing , characteristics and combat employments . So what is the point of developing GLATGM when you still have the same effective range with much less traveling speed regarding the ATGM 300m/s in comparison with the cumulative projectile HESH & HEAT 950m/s only the precision factor play here in the favour of the GLATGM beside the advantages of engagements of the low & slow flying aerial objects ( and even the tank rounds can engage low and slow flying aerial objects although it lacking the accuracy factor ) .
@@shilkaspaag7107 it was my mistake I forget the miserable bolsheviks 9M117 bastion , but anyway I am not sure they fired here an GLATGM because the recoil here is heavy for gun launched ATGM , I think the initial explosive charge used to fire the ATGM through the barrel so with the weight of the tank and the relatively slow launching speed the I think the recoil should be softer and In general from my very humble knowledge in the tanks , with the 105mm they traded the power of the higher caliber 120mm /125mm , with enhancing the effective engagement range and increasing the accuracy of the smaller caliber rifled gun standard rounds .
@@eagleeye6691 The host explained that this paragraph is the shot of the missile, and when he introduced the automatic loader at 12:30 you can see a GLATGM dummy round (the first in the first row).
@@waterbearjack2775 yes from Serbia for frontier cops(fc Balochistan) to fight against terrorists . Not for army . Army is going to buy VT4 after cancellation of Russian T-90s TOT transfer in Pakistan bcx of Indian pressures.
Bangladesh order VT5 for Bangladesh Army...
I think it's best choice of bangladesh...
Bangladesh Also choose
J10C Fighter jet for Bangladesh Air Force...
Long live Bangladesh China Friendship..❤️
Why not Indian arjun tank and tajesh hmmm. After all they are our friendly nation 🤣🤣
@@AnkurGurungtrendsetter they use cow shit as fuel.we don't have those in bd😂😂
is there any source on J10C order????? it seems more logical to purchase JF17 since they are cheaper and very capable, especially the block III model with AESA radar and super long range BVR missiles. and do we have the expected delivery time for vt5?? thx 😁
@@timothy1949 Jf 17 dont even stand a chance as it is a joint venture of China and Pakistan.So permission is needed from both countries.Some of It’s parts are built in China, others are in Pakistan... So it becomes very difficult for maintainance...and the engine is built in Russia and the Ruskies dont have good timing. So jf 17 are not on the bucket list....
well for strap cash country like Bangladesh, this tank is well enough. Pour your money for something else like development and education.
From Thailand . Thai Army uses the tank model MBT3000 or VT4 .Have passed the tests well The Tank is suitable for terrain to be used for national defense.
great to hear that.
VT-4 is heavy for our territories
vt-5 is light
Glad to see another Thai not brainwashed by US media
@@wongtan5680 🤡🤡
@@windowsxp7460 Why? you like sniffing Biden's demented fart?
GO Thailand, beat Vietnam like hell!
12:00 Best ! All the best China.....love from Assam.
Thank you! Love and support Assam!
@Akar Acharya 🤔🤔🤔 এমন চিন্তা ভাবনা কেন?
总是很接地气。。上次看到J20的图后面两个靓仔骑着一辆电瓶车经过
呵呵 其实这叫实用主义 美军是全方位考虑周到 每个细节都要帅 要好看 为的是好征兵 其实就是形式主义 不过土共这两年意识到 颜值其实就是战斗力 还不错
轻坦克，打得过我的上不来，上的来的打不过我。
90也能上来，就是跑不快，时速10-20公里
ftw ftw 看看毛子的2017坦克大赛 90平地抛锚……
@@林森焱-v1r T-90的炮瞄系统不咋样。
@@Sam-bm8tu 90 没有空调。
@@WBCY2024 90是70-80年代的老技术了
Recently we🇧🇩 got vt5 from china.
bhai jan vt4 not vt5
@Sakibur Rahman STILL THE TANK PAKISTAN GOT IS VT4 NOT VT5
@Sakibur Rahman oh sorry i thought i was talking about Pakistan
CCTV终于有这么大尺度的优质的军武节目了
Vanisshen 自信也是战斗力提升的体现
大型广告
兄弟，这是VT5，外贸产品
坦克揭秘（x）
坦克广告（o）
毕竟是要往外卖的东西
15式坦克，是一个高原利器，印度的t90估计在高原能跑一小时10-20公里，面对呼啸而来的每小时60公里的15式，基本就是一个静态靶标
Useless weapon with cowards Chinese! China can't even fire a single bullet. LoL arrogant war technology but non sense and trash talk.
这算是很稀有的专门设计的LT了，世界大部分LT都是装甲车地盘改造的，装甲和VT5完全没法比，当然你要说LT装甲没啥用，能抗400穿600破的正面，其实已经相当不错了，很多二代坦克都达不到这个水平
不算轻坦吧，vt5算轻量化主战坦克
巴顿 看点是能召集反坦克火力
但是VT5侧面几乎没有任何防护，被打到直接无了
欢乐打印机
Can anyone volunteer to add English subtitle? It would be helpful...
3:31秒，绝对吸睛的卖家秀！😂
Video Starts at 2:07
Philippines should consider this one sense Philippines is biding for kaplan and ascod2 to revive the light armour division
I prefer VT-5 and VN series than Kaplan and ASCOD2.
The Indonesians make pretty good tanks 2
Yupe... Malaysia should buy some too. It really fit our jungle and rice field area. This tank is like design for south east Asia land condition.
Not vt4?
Bangladesh also considered kaplan but choose VT-5 instead.
we are getting 140 in total and already got the delivery of 44
Bangladesh army purchasing 140 pcs VT-5 tank..
are they?
Confirmed
@@tanviralam7375 thats great
@@tanviralam7375 Wow! 130?
@@jackcc429 140indeed my friend，
It's said they also purchased some lightly armored vehicles for AA purposes
looking good. nice video
沒有人：
戰爭雷霆玩家：安東我要這個
10.3 請
Boris T 10.0吧 105炮有点尴尬
可以看出来 弹药隔舱化了
感觉国内把105做到极限了。
還沒，以後還有更厲害的105
但是全世界105的祖宗还都是L7
@@ReviveHF 现在普通的火炮其实基本都做到快极限了，除非用新原理，不知道哪天看到真正使用的电热化学炮
Qiankun Cui 普通炮弹已经达到极限了，贫铀弹就是最顶端的瓶颈了，要想突破瓶颈估计也就电磁跟化学类弹药了
@@汪馨洋 现阶段还是升级炮比较靠谱吧，贫铀弹最大的问题就是低速，而钨弹可以打到很高速但是有自遁效应
其实也是因为中国地理环境太过复杂所导致，西部高原山地，南部热带雨林和水田，并且这些地形所对应的对手，基建都不怎么样。于是跑重型主战坦克就是难为人。
就火力来说，这门105炮的膛压也是非常的高了，而且配用的长杆钨芯弹也是足够的强。
这是外贸坦克- -为客户设计的。。。
@@edward5228 我说的是轻量化主战坦克，包括15式，这个VT5是新设计的，但是渊源就是原先与南方某厂一同竞标失败后的一型车。
我觉得不够过瘾，应该从1500米开始，2000米，2500米测试主炮，然后5公里距离再来一发炮射导弹，打直升机目标或是地面目标。这样测才符合实战。
炮㙮尾部入彈非常方便但要加裝格柵因那裡太單薄了
台灣古董M60A3正面鋼裝甲
遇到這VT5開砲會被屌穿！
专门为阿三设计的
M1A1的最高速度也有66公里左右，VT5的优势不是速度！而是重量轻，能更好的适合山地，林地，泥泞地区作战！！这对亚洲地区有广泛的市场，而M1A1则更多的是在中东那样的地区驰骋！
US doesn't use M1A1 anymore, they use M1A2, and 66kmh is official number, in reality it can go much, much faster, past 100 kmh, and when the limit that's put on to preserve engine and transmission is off, it can go over 130 kmh
@@windowsxp7460 yes its use turbo prop but that must be glutony beast
Gaijin Gaijin PLZ, I want that !
II Frappuccino II I prefer Indian mbt tank ,you know
Gaijin: Take my model and shut up!
这广告就很魔性
If Active Protection System can be installed, it could be better deployed. Most armies need an all round battletank (MBT), and needs them in the hundreds for economy of scale for maintainence reasons. It'll be a great morale booster in any war
车里带led的按钮和我在中关村买的按钮零件一样啊，接地气
ZX GRIZZLY 采购维修价格都比较划算
🇧🇩 ❤️ 🇨🇳
居然不带头盔
it looks cool
Wow, no hearing protection as main gun fires next to the guy's head at 20 minute mark. Poor guy is probably deaf now.
lol
這坦克不錯
主持人还是不够专业，应该佩戴坦克帽，这样可以防噪声和防碰撞车体内。
毕竟不是毛叔
现代坦克的底盘性能，很大程度上已经不需要坦克帽保护头部了
那如果坦克中弹呢？
Long live Pakistan chaina Friendship
这是农业台科普拖拉机
Very good
其实先出口，让别人先实战把问题都发现了，解决后在装备，蛮好的。无人机就是这样，现在不是越做越好了嘛。
早就部署到印度边界了，还用等实战后？现在什么年代了还模拟不出真实战场吗
Gridline view
♥️🇨🇳♥️🇵🇰
In English to ok or in type to read ,jf.
为什么不选择使用半可燃弹壳？感觉每次射击完后清理炮弹壳很费力😥
我覺得是因為安全性考量。中國99、96式的裝彈機是在車身中間的盤式，在俄系坦克的實戰中可以看出很容易殉爆，所以VT5(13:36)中的裝填方式變成在了炮塔後方，中間有一塊裝甲板。一方面不容易被打到，另一方面彈藥爆燃時可以増加組員生存率，而且裝彈速度更快。而這種裝填方式或許比較適用於整裝彈。
@@ultra-schildkrote-4992 俄系坦克殉爆最主要原因是灭火系统很差劲，其次是弹药化学配方不够先进，高温金属碎片就能引燃弹药迅速殉爆。而转盘式装弹机也分成T-72的横盘式和T-80的肘节式，肘节式的正侧面投影面积过大，也容易被击中，而横盘式就好一些。再者遇到强穿甲弹药，实际上西方系坦克尾仓表现也是一个死字，这一点在叙利亚已经都被证实了。所以这些储弹装弹方式主要的影响因素还是在于用什么弹，吊篮式装弹机主要还是分装弹影响的，而尾仓式装弹机则是适用整装弹。所以这两种在中国陆军都有使用。
中国的是履铜的钢药筒一体弹药，用的是全球领先，而且是唯一的焊接药筒工艺，发射时，膛压更高，更稳定，弹药速度更快，威力更大。
他们几个的回答挺专业的，另外咱们的120弹就是可燃药筒，105就不是。应该不是技术问题，二十适合问题。
Why is your title is in English while the video is in mandarin. lol
安東我要這輛，就放在勇虎之下，分房10.3.
你这是要屠幼吗？很不道德啊😁
@@tubeathrun VT5再加上FY5正面可以抗所有的高頂級房鋼針，而且炮射飛彈的穿深可達到800mm左右。再者VT5的105mm的鋼針穿深也已達到500mm左右。
@@ReviveHF 中系顶级房太惨了 就一个都快退役的96a 哭了
@@ReviveHF 中系顶级房太惨了 就一个都快退役的96a 哭了
@@明成祖朱棣-d5y 趕快加15式，就放在9.7就可，不用放在10. 3, 同樣放在勇虎之下。
已经出口到泰国了
周三元 那是VT4
那是VT4
孟加拉国河流众多，水网发达，已经采购VT5坦克。
I like all the adds. Communism at it's finest.
竟然用的是榴弹演示，用APFSDS岂不是更准？
为了更好呈现效果，ap穿过的布孔会很小，不容易拍吧？
因爲APFSDS更貴啊
用榴弹会爆炸最起码知道大概位置，你用AP打过去……矣…炮弹呢？都看不到效果的
看到这个grouping就知道重复精度惊人
중꿔의 대실수(?)
Type 15 or ZTQ-15 medium tank.
They are different tanks
总听成BT-5
射豹神车👌🏿
THE VT-5 TANK WILL BE EMPLOYED IN TIBET
Bangladesh army also order vt 5 tank
Bangladesh army also visit Indonesian and Turkey
Harmful light tank
总感觉国内不注重戴耳罩，许多特殊环境都需要的，听力问题有时候不会很快出现，会在年龄较大时才体现，随着国家经济水平提升我觉得应该注意这个问题了
不理解你的想法。有耳机干嘛要耳罩？坦克成员组之间是需要沟通的
@@seraphimworms899 耳罩是为了降低噪声对听力的影响，这种影响可能是长时间的，影响中老年时的听力，开炮的时候产生噪音的分贝对听力影响应该不小。沟通的话耳罩式耳机可以兼顾
@@stevene.cummer1576 本来就是这样呢，视频里面那些是工厂的员工，拉出来溜溜而已，又不是坦克兵
是有的，泰国买vt4都带，这是工厂测试，随便玩的说实话
不是感觉，其实就是，老是喜欢要求士兵吃苦耐劳。
耕战
为中国军工加油
English subtitle please
加油！
the weak spot for this tank is back rear and top of the tank..very light armor
Axe pro right, but it’s too light.
The comment squad of course, it’s a light tank. It’s made for less accessible areas where it is more likely that someone comes from the back, like in small roads in valleys with bridges for example.
The comment squad we would expect more protection with the VT4
@@ibexmotor wow a light tank that is too light, well o...
No shit sherlock
不知道能通过年检不
the vt5 tank's front has a weird design
VT-5和15式看着像缩小版的豹2A6
不像，豹式很长很长，炮塔也很长，
我们坦克相对对称点
有點像法國坦克不過感覺整體外型設計又好像有參考日本10式設計
@@Mike-io9kk 法系。。
malaysia crazy siao笑 我也觉得15式对标日本10式。轻型山地，定位几乎一样
前面的装甲里面都是空心的
We need English dubbed version for better understanding
This is a TV show aimed at domestic audiences. Therefore, foreign audiences are not considered.
น่าจะแปลเป็นไทยนะครับ
ใช่ครับ
記者連頭盔,耳筒.護目鏡也没有,便進入射撃中的砲塔,,非常兒戲!
这跟测试项目和测试单位有关，就跟你测枪的高低温耐性，非得穿个防弹衣、CQB头盔面罩一样，多此一举
国产威武！
三哥早點名
Make video in english, or at least convert it in English 🙄🙄
前进时， 炮口冲前还是后
GO CHINA!
m1 abrams still superior
Apple and orange
@@feng443 both are tanks, no ?
@@tomservo5007 pls, research their weight & class. Abrams is MBT/heavy, this one is light-medium. Abrams can fight T-72 easily, but cannot be deployed in Himalayan highlands Bangladesh rice fields, Russian mud field, or Vietnam jungle
The price and weight are several times
Bruh, imagine comparing a 36 ton light tank to the Abrams(Which is about 60 tons right now)
That's a lot of salt needed there
我们的坦克主要是用在西北高原吧
主要是vt5搭载的105mm线膛炮搭配穿甲弹效果的确不错，1公里范围内可以击穿830mm防护装甲，t90s虽然拥有更大口径主炮，但是穿甲力并没有更好，vt5还更灵活更快速
真敢说
830mm搞笑呢
680mm 吧我记得
啊 不是自动挡吗 哈哈哈 居然还是手动档
军用变速箱都是手自一体的，自动档在某些时候不好使
自动挡的
印度T90高原反应严重，各种开不动。
1，你看舱内那个烟，吓人的多，2，炮塔后面就这样没点防护？3任何坦克进入战场都要这样去校准吗？那突袭仗还咋打
1，听说个丁格尔效应没有？2，所有坦克后面装甲都是脆皮更不用谈这种轻坦。3.你大概不知道即便室温相对装药标准温度有较大偏移都会对发射药燃烧充分度有影响进而影响射击精度另外温度对炮管的曲度都会有些微影响但这可以通过激光校准装置校正。
你甚至不知道让炮管处于冰凉甚至冰冷状态的火炮击发第一发冷炮是一件比较危险的事，无论中外的榴弹炮第一发冷炮都是要用击发绳让人在远处击发的就是为了防止炸膛。
@@ddluciferdd2251 服，大大的服，懂得很多。
@@binliu3220 不是我懂的多是你完全不懂。
@@ddluciferdd2251 也不是，经常看看国内外的武器对比，还是有点耳闻的。看完之后就感觉很多地方国产坦克细节差距还是很大。
炮塔有一点像勒克莱尔？像不像
turret designs remembering me of the K2 Black Panther
bullshit
Micyle5
牛
第一炮是溫炮？😆
现在，火炮在发射第一发炮弹时，常见到的拉绳子现象，应该是发射大号装药或者是冷炮射击时才会看到。
发射第一发炮弹时，火炮的炮膛温度低，此时药温不稳定，驻梨和底板与地面结合也不严实，复进机和驻退机还未很好润滑，火炮的稳定性不够，易发生掀翻火炮甚至炸膛的事故。
因此，在发射第一发炮弹时，炮手基本上都距离火炮十来米远，用绳索来拉发射火炮，以保证炮手的安全，第一发试射，火炮状态稳定，就采用扣动击发扳机发射方式了。
采用大号装药发射时，也采用长约十米的绳索拉动击发，以避免炮手受到冲击波的严重影响，也是为了保证炮手的安全。据称自行榴弹炮，由于本身重量非常沉，所以就不需要稳炮射击，但在发射第一发炮弹时，为了乘员安全起见，照样乘员离车，采用拉绳索击发的方式。
英军最先进的M777型155毫米超轻型榴弹炮，在发射第一发炮弹时，也是拉绳索击发的，这是为了保证射手的安全，全世界的火炮都是遭此操作，此射击方式与火炮是否先进无关。
ПИНДАД 👍 👍 👍 👍 👍 ПЕНЧАК СИЛАТ 👍 👍 👍 👍 👍
这个装弹跟勒克莱尔很像
尾仓装弹机基本都是这么个布置， 90式的装弹机也是类似的东西
mini AMX-56 -Leclerc , light tank with 105mm rifled gun , I think the chinese designed it to the fighting in the mountain area and thus it is directed to counter indian army , but depending on the how the ammo types and advancement I think it could be very capable tank destroyer beside its suitable to fight the Donkey americans IAV Stryker where both armed with 105 mm rifled gun and both platform could play the same role on the battlefield where the Stryker for being wheeled platform could be more agile and employed as an advance heavy but it lacks the ppropriate armor and comes with high profile and big cross section ( to counter the IED ) and thus its offer a very recognizable target on the battlefield , although I think the fire power tend in favour of the Donkey americans platform due to the Donkey americans long history in designing , producing and operating 105 mm , but with smaller profile and hunter-killer capability for the VT5 it could sweep the battlefield from the Donkey americans IAV Stryker , the Chinese could supply this tank with depleted uranium ( DU ) APFSDS kinetic energy rounds this would enhance drastically the penetration capability of the 105mm rifled gunand increas the target defeat probability . regarding the gun launched ATGM although the tank possess the capabilities to fire the ATGM through its barrel but In general from my very humble knowledge , in the tanks with the 105mm they traded the power of the higher caliber 120mm /125 mm , with the enhancing the effective engagement range and increasing the accuracy of the smaller caliber rifled gun standard rounds , beside practically the launching of ATGM from rifled barrel will lead to rapid corrosion of the barrel rifling only if our Chinese friends came with very special metal or they treat the barrel with a chemical or add metal that increase the life expectancy of the barrel with the rapid firing of ATGM , but bare in mind the L7 gun 105 mm of the english Centurion tank effective combat range is 4000 meter with the HESH round while the GLATGM HEAT have effective combat range of 4000 m ( with modern Belgium / Ukrainian gun launched 105 mm ATGM goes for 5000 m , while For the zionist entity lahat ATGM , have an effective range of 8,000m, which gives this guided missile an qualitative advantages in anti- targets roles ( ground / air mainly low flying aerial objects ) . and both HESH / HEAT& ATGM categorized as chemical munitions ( explosive payloads ), despite the fact that both are radically different in terms of designing , characteristics and combat employments .
So what is the point of developing GLATGM when you still have the same effective range with much less traveling speed regarding the ATGM 300m/s in comparison with the cumulative projectile HESH & HEAT 950m/s only the precision factor play here in the favour of the GLATGM beside the advantages of engagements of the low & slow flying aerial objects ( and even the tank rounds can engage low and slow flying aerial objects although it lacking the accuracy factor ) .
Shot of ATGM launch at 24：30
@@shilkaspaag7107 it was my mistake I forget the miserable bolsheviks 9M117 bastion , but anyway I am not sure they fired here an GLATGM because the recoil here is heavy for gun launched ATGM , I think the initial explosive charge used to fire the ATGM through the barrel so with the weight of the tank and the relatively slow launching speed the I think the recoil should be softer
and In general from my very humble knowledge in the tanks , with the 105mm they traded the power of the higher caliber 120mm /125mm , with enhancing the effective engagement range and increasing the accuracy of the smaller caliber rifled gun standard rounds .
@@eagleeye6691 The host explained that this paragraph is the shot of the missile, and when he introduced the automatic loader at 12:30 you can see a GLATGM dummy round (the first in the first row).
@@shilkaspaag7107 ok I do not understand Chinese and thank you for the info ....
i wouldn't trust the indians with the most expensive tank
装弹的部位好像装甲很薄
炮塔后边嘛, 坦克后边和侧面在战场上等同于裸奔
美国M1 Abrams也是这个设计，炮塔后面装甲很薄，但是和成员舱室之间的隔板很厚。这样在炮弹被击中爆炸的时候会向后爆炸，而不会伤到成员
炮塔尾部说实话再加厚一倍也挡不住坦克炮弹直接命中，弄薄一点被命中时弹药反倒有个倾泄出口
Trường Sa , Hoàng Sa của Việt Nam
Translation: The Spratly Islands are not vietamese.
@@janusjones6519 Incorrect translation , shut up China virut
@@longvo5775 I am Vietnamese.
@@janusjones6519 shut up ,you not Vietnamese . Vietnamese very hate China ,ok
@@longvo5775 keep hating. its useless
工作人员放炮弹的时候，我看，后面的防护力很薄弱啊，这要被打中了就玩完啦。
Tianyi Zhang 反正賣給黑人用 沒所謂啦
这个估计会上舰
就是后置弹舱设计啊，有防爆门打中了弹药殉爆了人也没事
這是有隔離艙的，現代坦克都是炮塔尾倉是弱點
但是這種設計在彈藥倉殉爆的同時會快速泄壓
避免乘員承受
加多少裝甲尾艙該爆還是爆，這種設計還可以在彈藥殉爆時保護車組
There is a lot of Light tanks being developed right now k-21, Ascod 2, the Kaplan, Griffon 2 and the CV90-120 to name a few. Who would buy this.
你可能不知要这个世界上有两百多个国家和地区，你们眼里什么时候真正有过非洲和拉丁美洲？种族主义者们
Thailand、Bangladesh、Pakistan、Burma、Argentina、Cambodia、Ethiopia、Indonesia、Malaysia、U.A.E。
中国有句话很适合你，吃不到葡萄葡萄就是酸的
xROJANBOx 送你两个字，傻逼
@@METROPOLIStima no way Indonesia will buy this , get your shit right
人员的安全防护太不到位了，至少应该有防噪耳机吧。
不能用，因为有时候耳朵是非常重要的战场感知的来源，尤其是晚上，训练有素的坦克员能够听到一公里外坦克连的声音
@@peterpista2652靠听的，又不是二战？除非熄火，否则自己坦克的噪音就够大了。一公里范围非常近，有目标车长热成像仪直接就发现了。坦克兵在作战时是有专用头盔的，也有耳机，包括中国也是，这是标准装备。因为坦克噪音大，必须有专用的扩音器和送话器才能听见说话，还有就是防住行进中头撞到坦克内部的部件。我只是说他们测试人员防护不行，没说作战人员。
@@KevinChen2022 测试人员确实，但是作战人员，听还是很重要的…… 不然也不会有那么多人说M1A2的燃气轮机在夜晚隐蔽性好了。而且，一公里范围，很可能出于地形、障碍物等等，无法发现对方。比如对方躲在掩体后面，只露出一个炮塔，没有开火过的炮管，己方是行军，发动机红外信号很明显，热成像仪也长时间使用冷却效果不佳，听觉不是说很有用，但是有总比没有要好
这只是测试人员
@Peter Pista ,
天呐，敌军坦克连都到一公里外了，你还要靠耳朵听？ 上空应该一直有无人机探路才对！ 数据链可以分享看到的一切.
Pakistan buying 300 VT4
M. Hamza really？I just heard them brought hundreds of T62 or T55 from Ukraine
@@waterbearjack2775 yes from Serbia for frontier cops(fc Balochistan) to fight against terrorists . Not for army . Army is going to buy VT4 after cancellation of Russian T-90s TOT transfer in Pakistan bcx of Indian pressures.
@@hamza-or3gb I have heard about it too, but any source and how many orderd? thx
@@hamza-or3gb Exactly, I don't think anyone would expect the soldiers to fight A T72 with a T62 LoL
디자인은 꽤 ㅆㅅㅌㅊ인듯?
小帅
@@yangzhang9716小帅? 「酷」的意思正確嗎？ 是的，沒錯，大多數韓國人都承認那輛坦克的設計很酷
@@玛薇卡 네, 맞습니다. 🆒😂
another chinese fake
能不能搞无人坦克，上面搞个激光炮，或者电磁炮。
yijun hua 有个总师忘了叫啥说了，以后的坦克都会往无人化发展
解放军放过一个视频，把那些59坦克直接改成无人坦克，有个士兵直接在车外操控
乌克兰改造过
@@BOBO-el5ob 17年有报道，说是改造了一批老59无人化进行实验= =但没有后续报道。
改的老59都当靶车去了，这种实验性的东西就当积累经验
1 javelin missile and tank gone
India doesnt have a single opponent to this light tank.
Ngô Khánh it looks like a modern verson of the Soviet t-34-85
@@sgt_malice4521 it is a descendant of Type 62 light tank.
true
that's why they're buying Sprut SD from Russia
70公里每小时，超越大部分坦克，我就喷了，中宣还是老样子.
其实很多坦克能跑过70KM/H，只不过对悬挂损伤很大，甚至直接断轮子（参考坦克两项96A），15式轻，跑到70悬挂受得了。区别在这里。
我只知道15式不止跑70公里每小时，在高原环境都不止，就是作战半径不行
M1A2坦克速度 72千米/小时
豹2坦克 速速 72 千米/小时
挑战者2 速度 52千米/小时
T72 速度 60千米/小时
韩国K2 速度 70千米/小时
日本90 速度 70千米/小时
----------------------------------------------
VT-5 ，速度 70千米/小时。已经达到和接近世界最顶尖坦克的速度水平。超越了大部分坦克是不争现实！！其次70KM的速度，是一个合理速度，更快，对坦克本身的机械设备，驾驶人员都是挑战。你要说VT-5能不能研发到80，甚至90KM。完全没有压力！
驴得水 像M1A2和豹这种坦克跑到这么快其实有点极限了
@@youngdorry6965
是的，其实一两公里的极速没有太大意义！坦克的实战环境，很少用得到极速！！
这吨功率也不行呀
他们算错了，1000/35=28..
@@shiyu7119 他说的应该是千瓦为单位不是马力，按他说的数据用千瓦换算马力差不多就是了
是千瓦，不是马力
加速性能比无人机还快
@@shiyu7119 15式是1000hp，vt5只有883hp