@@Jediwolf75 i mean if memes come and go then the yes meme wouldnt be used anymore just like many other old memes, so yeah people need to get with the times instead of relying on old not funny stuff, the yes meme is still pretty new since it gained popularity during plandemic of covid. i personally found the yes meme to be stupid.
For real.. I'm on the fence about it. I thought I was a hard no but my biggest gripe about 2042 was actually the complete lack of hit reg. Shit maps, and all the operators/gadgets are up there. Might try it out with the battlefield homies, who knows.
not gonna happen, people will play it either way... it's meant to be a futuristic game after all. If it's better than 2042 and MWIII it will do well, and it's free. Can't be beggars in such a case.
@@euphoreonzjust because it’s free doesn’t mean it costs nothing. Our time is valuable, and a good experience isn’t a bad thing to ask for. And yes, beggars can be choosers in this instance, because if the game does not offer what is asked or desired for, then back to the status quo of COD & Battlefield we will go. The game looks great though, and I will likely be spending a decent chunk of my time with it.
I’d be glad if this game simply takes over battlefield. Honestly I don’t trust that dice will make a good game again if 2042 was anything to go by. Like it’s insane they released something so shit that battlebit has better NetCode, fluidity and gameplay.
This! BC2, BF3, and BF4 were peak Battlefield. Now that BF3 and BF4 servers are to be shut down the only option remaining.are these arcady hero shooters or full milsim like Squad/Arma.
because you can still battlefield 4. Lets be honest, doing the same thing over and over again with just better graphics is gonna achieve the same results. People will just go (This is just BF4, scam!)
@@user-ex6nr9to6g the company who made this game did work for COD mobile so it would explain why sounds and animations look similar, most likely reusing some of the assets
@@dylankelly6189 they were using animations from cod as place holders but recently they've updated them to their own. You've got to remember that this is the pre alpha
Because it quite literally is from MWII... Up until recently, they even had reload animations that were straight up ported from MW2019 and MWII, they only recently made their own animations but by the looks of it, the sprinting and firing animations are still from MWII. Now these are in fact CoD developers who made CoD Mobile so they most likely had access to all sorts of CoD assets.
Samsung is an older company than Apple. Does this mean that Apple has copied Samsung's phones ? Tell me in which episode can I find dammage points stacking up and a skull showing up once I've killed an ennemy ? In which episode the exat same menu as in Battlefield 2042 ? The same HUD ?
People are criminally under looking the Tarkov like gunsmith. The fact that we have a high level gunsmith in a bf like game is insane. Not even CODs can match it
Delta Force even has Ammo & Health Stations scattered across per flags unlike 2042, which DICE can't even add and also have 40+ weapons that is still in the pre-alpha unlike 2042's 22+ weapon at launch...
I thought I was the only one noticing, the UI is too colorful it feels like I'm playing fortnite or overwatch and not a world war 3-based game@@euphoreonz
Even has a better atmosphere, almost more realistic and gritty-looking compared to BF2042's plastic, pristine look. And it's free, and it has a campaign! I just hope this gives DICE a kick in the * and they realize we want a complete game if we're going to spend $70.
@@jkzamien These guys aren't in it for "the community". Do you think the EV manufacturers of China care about the environment and that's why they're making a fuckton of different EVs right now? No. It's about mass and money.
I don't think this game (HAWK OPS) is gonna be successful unless they change it. Too many people already calling it a 2042 clone/knockoff, and that's gonna put a lot of weight on its reputation. I think Tencent is second to none when it comes to developing mobile shooters (though their games are not very controller friendly to say the least), and Arena Breakout Infinite looks good, even though I haven't played it because it's only on PC RN, but I don't know what they were thinking with this one......
@spartan_a1176 ehh battlefield 3,4 and 1 were definitely full arcade...squads not arcade armas not arcade and battlefield is nothing like them lol it's always been a casual arcade combined arms game
For a minute there I thought Novalogic came back with a new version of Delta Force: Land Warrior. Played that before BF1942 but '42 changed the landscape with all the vehicles.
it's a free game, I can handle a few abilities... much rather that than trashy fkn crossover skins and death effects. This looks far more interesting than 2042 or MWIII
@@Magicbeatz_YTwho doesn't? They undoubtedly have the most polished gunplay in the whole industry which is pretty clear when you consider how many games are trying to have CoD like gunplay.
Give me weather effects, more physics and destruction; with a good update timeline coming with weapons, vehicles, maps and more features. I'm all in. we'll see.
I think the biggest positive a Free to Play Battlefield Clone has that if its successfull it will have many years of support and content unlike battlefield and call of duty which ususally only gets 1-2 years support even if its sucessfull.
@@jgsource552in all honesty people didn't wanted to play it so DICE just cutted the support. For the first time it was fans mistake. Also game was hated until later when it became popular. What a joke of community. They hated the game literally despised it in beginning and then it became the most played battlefield.
@@rokos.1239 well no one asked them to turn their depiction of ww2 into a screaming woman simulator with modern weapon attachments (because God forbid some zoomer needs to use traditional gun sights to aim)
Hyped. If our own companies refuse to give us what we want, foreign developers have a massive opportunity to sweep in and dominate the field. I wish them luck.
At least they nailed the small implementations - Health bars in deployment screen, leaning, clear sights on guns. These are only a few but simple additions that 2042 didnt have on launch and may not even have now
Honestly from playing the closed alpha myself I’ve enjoyed it a fair bit! There’s some toning that needs to do but aside from that it’s honestly been a blast
Just a note, it does feature dynamic destruction, big explosions can blow up holes in walls. Watching Jakfrag's video at one point a tank blew up a hole on the warehouse he was in, and it even destroyed a part of the ceiling. Also it was showcased in a devlog video I think.
i dont care how similar it is to battlefield which you seem to be focusing on in this video, the main point is what has it done that battlefield hasnt done? what makes this stand out from battlefield? what does it do better because from what ive seen so far people say this is a better battlefield and im here for it. No hate intended im just curious as to why this is seems to do a better job.
The one distinction of all the similarities is that DFHO has it in the game even in pre alpha phase, while BF2042 had to patch many of these features after launch of the game ([scoreboard, marksman kill bonus, squad management] AAA studio vs third party devs --- SMH pretty sad)
Okay, but that weapon stat menu breakdown makes me salivate. It even has a recoil/shot placement chart that seems like it updates with attachments. Why is that much detail not standard across all of these games?
@@stormdivision617 They talking cause its like the same game. I personally hated 2042 because it just didn’t even feel like a battlefield. This game just copies 2042 so its really just the same thing.
Me: Bro, can I copy your homework? Bro: Sure, bro. Just change a few things so it's not obvious. Later: Bro: MY BROTHER IN CHRIST! I SAID DON'T MAKE IT OBVIOUS!!!
He yapped for 10 mins about how delta is just ripping off battlefield, but didn't said about the actual "innovative elements" delta has over Battlefield. >Better classes equipment and better balanced example - the medic can heal multiple players at once, not just 1 with a few shots. >Delta has a Extraction mode which is designed and made well, its close to MWZ quality if not better lmao >Better maps design compared to 2042, yes its less maps, only like 2 , but theyre good to play in and they are so beautiful and the gameplay on them feels good Quality over quantity. >Delta has a strong gunsmith customisation that is very close to what we have in MW3 Many weapons at launch, many attachments and good level progression on the weapons with good awards such as better attachments Battlefield 2042 had 2 guns at the launch lmao and theres like 4 attachments in the whole game, thats wild And also explain how delta has in an alpha state more weapons than 2042 does after being finished ☠️ Overall Delta force might be a copy paste, but a good one They added the battlefield elements, made them better, added some good UI design, improved the maps and here we go, a perfect Battlefield Formula everyone wants oh also lol, delta is free, i think its enough for this to rip on battlefield
One of my favorite features of Delta Force is the "share loadout" option. It will give you a code, which your friend then can import, and it will automatically equip all the attachments. (If they're unlocked)
omg delta force was the og back in the days dude you couldve just looked it you its actually a remake of the orignial delta force hawk ops from early 90s and 2000s
I wish we had a game that’s part battlefield and part squad that’s a huge market right there !! And no company takes advantage of it cause they rather pursue ideas that are burnt out !
Copying or not, i haven't been this excited for a new FPS ever since BF1. Even with the gadgets bs, they still seem more fun to use than 2042. And the whole game and operators still have a military aesthetic.
8:37 I'm pretty sure there was a portion of Jack's video where destruction was seen. But it clearly was not as common as it is in most Battlefield games.
yes there is a bit of destruction on the maps but as you say it's not comparable to the old Battlefields. I would put it more on the level of Bf2042. You can break a few walls here and there, but the big basic structures can't be changed unfortunately. But that could also be due to the two maps. One is a relatively small map of a city in the desert, where it would be rather bad if you could destroy all the buildings. The other map has the feel of Iwo Jima from Battlefield V, but in a modern setting. Admittedly, there was already very little to hardly any destruction in BfV's Imo Jima.
@@thelittledetailscr7231it doesn't matter where on the planet their base is. EA will sue them if they don't make changes. I thought this was BF 2042 first time I saw some gameplay, the similarities can't be denied by anyone at this point.
@@bjarnisThere is a reason that counterfeit items is so popular in China... The companies in China steal intellectual property all the time and they face no consequences.
@bjarnis Not true. Why don't the gun manufacturers sue Tarkov for using the real gun names without permission then? They can't. Battlestate is in Russia.
In my opinion, it seems they are focusing more on making a functional game rather than being innovative. I've seen many people complain and wish for Battlefield to return to its roots for years now. Hopefully, EA wakes up, and the next Battlefield doesn't fizzle out immediately.
yes and no, battlefield 1 was a masterpiece but out of all the battlefields i played BF4 the most and for good reason, that game is by far the best BF game to date.
I've been exhausted by the "operator" bullshit for years already, and this looks more like a BF2042 copy/paste than a real BF experience. Instantly disinterested.
As an og battlefield player, this looks like COD to me, but unfortunately battlefield tried to copy COD in recent years after COD copied battlefield in 2019. So sad. Hope the game is good though.
I'm excited. This game looks fun. so far it looks like what a successful 2042 would look like. And besides, if this game actually does end up being real competition for battlefield, then thats only good for us as players. DICE would then realize that they need to step up their game to keep their players. Lets just hope for the best.
At this point I want a Battlefield game that is not from DICE. Since BF3 they released their games in an alpha state and at the point it got to a true release state the next slop got dropped and the one with the at that point decent gameplay got left behind. So yeah im so done with DICE it is not even funny...
What are you even on about lol. 'Looking similar' means jack and wont stand in court as it doesn't feature any trademarked characters. Design similarities is actually deliberate and a good thing cos that makes a new game easier to get into. UA-camrs gotta cook up drama outta nothing huh
When a game is made to look as realistic as possible then there’s no real artistic design, it’s just realistic design. So anyone else that decides to make a realistic shooter will end up looking and playing very similarly. BF is not an artistic game and doesn’t do anything to stand out visually, which is fine but other games will be similar by nature.
If EA wants battlefield to stay relevant they really need to nail the next title. They also really need to mitigate people choosing to play this, they should consider making 2042 free to play. Maybe give anyone who bought it getting all cosmetics and a 20% discount on the next title.
I'm sorry, but both turrets at 4:30 look nothing alike, you're stretching the truth here... (unless you're talking about mechanics, but you said 'looks' not 'works') Apart that, the rest seems more fair. To be fair, a free, decent BF clone still sounds not bad, considering how recent BF games are approached. Personally I am more interested in the extraction mode, not those 20v20 games or whatever.
Nice. Since EA has forgotten what this franchise is about its nice to see another developer take up the blue print I love and enjoyed. I bought 2042 for 12€ in a steam sale and refunded it. I am an assault player / medic and nearly all my teammates where grey old women... including me.
Once again, the old glories of battlefield streamers return to the new battlefield competitor. Hopefully, this Delta Force will get the Battlefield team pumping and working hard to have a great title.
As I absolutely hate Tencent as a company and the disgusting way they copied everything from Battlefield for their game, I feel the same way to EA / DICE on how they neglected the Battlefield franchise far too long. I hope this will be a wake-up call to EA / DICE on making a real Battlefield game and to also start listening to their community on what WE want and not what the investors want.
Good. People wanted a better Battlefield game not made by DICE. And we all know EA is never going to sell the rights, so here is the next best option for Battlefield fans.
Yes, but only on one of the 2 maps (well, the other is a desert map so it fits) and on the other map it's more like BfVs Iwo Jima. So wait and see and lower your expectations a bit.
Imo, battlefield has no right to claim an entire subgenre of fps. Like yea all of those are similar, but thode are just things that make this kind of shooter work
More like rip Delta Force. It's just another free game that's probably gonna be full with P2W and other micro transaction crap, plus a blatant amount of cheaters, which the devs probably won't care about since the game is owned by Tencent. Honestly it looks way more like COD than Battlefield.
@@SwedishTrollo wow man, why are you defending battlefield, the game is trash, i was a hardcore battlefield fan until after battlefield 1, i miss the old battlefield and the game just doesn't look like fun at all, this game on the other hand seems like an absolute blast, im actually excited to play this game, the game is in alpha and already has many many more features compared to when 2042 was released, you're riding a dead horse my guy.
@@blakemccruden9228 I'm just predicting how the game will end. The Finals was a popular free game too with battle pass and micro transcation. How much has the playerbase dropped on Steam since the release? From 200k to 10k. World War 3 was another super hyped game but it failed miserably. How many people are playing that game today? When it comes to free games with micro transcations then they tend to be less liked than bought games. I have seen how games like Delta Force usually end up.
They copied 2042 and mw. But 2042 isn't even real BF game, so let them have fun. Although I'm yet to see any f2p rip off from China that didn't failed bc of mtx. And for the love of god will people stop saying "this is what 2042 should've been". No, no it isn't! 2042 should've been classic BF, without fucking operators, abilities, weird call ins etc. Both 2042 and DF are awful as BF games
@@totalguardian1436 Where did I, or any of the veteran players for that matter, said BF5 was good BF game? Even BF1, which is maybe the best casual mp fps of 2010's, falls short for classic BF game.
@@totalguardian1436 Many BF fans are BF1 rookies. Which was the whole point for dice. Dumb down a game a little to bring more players. BF 5 is a good solid game on its own. BF 1 is great game on its own. But as a pure BF game they both fall short. I agree they are both miles ahead of 2042 as games and I would even argue as BF games. But that isn't saying much since 2042 is one of the worst mp fps games made in the last 15+yrs. But that doesn't mean 2042 should have been like DF, or even BF1 and 5. It should have been classic BF game, for long standing fans who were with a franchise since early beginnings, long before BF1. So called love letter, as dice called it.
Do people around you know you just now heard the name Delta Force?! Do you have any friends (to set you straight when you' dumb)?! I bet you're fun at parties (with ideas such as these)!
Dev: "What do we want this game to play like?"
Lead: "Battlefield"
Dev: "Which one?"
Lead: "Yes"
Which one!?… “The one made for Fortnite kids! The newest version of us fcking up the entire game!
People still do the “Yes” meme?
@@KEYTV13bro memes come and go so fast nowadays who tf cares if an old meme is used.
@@Jediwolf75 Me and 2 others literally just showed a care… why do people say “who cares” after watching someone clearly care?
@@Jediwolf75 i mean if memes come and go then the yes meme wouldnt be used anymore just like many other old memes,
so yeah people need to get with the times instead of relying on old not funny stuff,
the yes meme is still pretty new since it gained popularity during plandemic of covid.
i personally found the yes meme to be stupid.
Man, if they are gonna copy Battlefield at least don't copy 2042. Copy a Battlefield game that we actually want.
For real.. I'm on the fence about it. I thought I was a hard no but my biggest gripe about 2042 was actually the complete lack of hit reg. Shit maps, and all the operators/gadgets are up there. Might try it out with the battlefield homies, who knows.
They’re not just copying Battlefield. They’re mimicking Call of Duty as well.
I'm getting some BF4 vibes. Hopefully that carries through in feel.
correct, nobody needed a copy of 2024.. they even made it worse by adding cod gunplay and movement.. absolute dogshit
BF4
apparently no one told the chinese we didn't like the hero-operators in bf2042
I can’t believe they didn’t even do enough research to learn that lmao. Huge missed opportunity for them
I think they only did it to show dice and ea how it should've been done. Anyways this game isn't even out and it's better than 2042 already 😂
It’s a free game, so if they can’t sell skins, they never would have got the investment money to make the game. Had to.
@@Mind_Splitter
i think they copied it early
The older Delta Force games had hero operators. Delta Force Land Warrior you could choose between Longbow, Snake Eye, Gas Can, Mako, and Pitbull.
So Delta Force is what BF2042 would have looked like if it wasn't rushed
It’s what 2042 would’ve looked like if it had any Battlefield in it
Yep, hell it even has destruction LOL
Had they removed specialists I would be more interested.
not gonna happen, people will play it either way... it's meant to be a futuristic game after all. If it's better than 2042 and MWIII it will do well, and it's free. Can't be beggars in such a case.
they gave us Tarkov like gunsmith instead
well it's still an alpha so maybe
but it's an easy monetization spot so I wouldn't expect it
@@euphoreonzjust because it’s free doesn’t mean it costs nothing. Our time is valuable, and a good experience isn’t a bad thing to ask for. And yes, beggars can be choosers in this instance, because if the game does not offer what is asked or desired for, then back to the status quo of COD & Battlefield we will go.
The game looks great though, and I will likely be spending a decent chunk of my time with it.
They really had a copy the worst battlefield
Battlefield needs the competition
It needs to be replaced. FML just remake bf4.
Battlefield is dead. Move on. Squad is closer to battlefield than anything since Battlefield 2142.
If by competition you mean someone stealing your homework and giving it a better font
I’d be glad if this game simply takes over battlefield. Honestly I don’t trust that dice will make a good game again if 2042 was anything to go by. Like it’s insane they released something so shit that battlebit has better NetCode, fluidity and gameplay.
@brianrad_ it needs competition however I don't want one that play almost exactly like BF lol
"You're just a cheap copy!"
"No, I'm the upgrade"
Knockoff
Yeah right..
@@alexandernoskov60 I hadn't watched it in a while lol but same difference
not hard to upgrade over 2042, Battlefield games from a decade ago still knocks both of these out of the park!
just asking here, If I'm not wrong, Delta Force was older than both Bf and CoD, right?
Why cant we just have Battlefield 3 or 4. A solid middle ground between a sim and an arcade game with defined classes and rolls. Why is that so hard
This! BC2, BF3, and BF4 were peak Battlefield. Now that BF3 and BF4 servers are to be shut down the only option remaining.are these arcady hero shooters or full milsim like Squad/Arma.
exactly
Because heroes are easy to monetize and it’s a free2play game
because you got it in BFV and people put other gameplay elements in their crosshairs to complain about instead
because you can still battlefield 4. Lets be honest, doing the same thing over and over again with just better graphics is gonna achieve the same results. People will just go (This is just BF4, scam!)
this game barely came out and the maps are better than 2042 😂
Unironically the maps are great.
On the other hand: that’s not very difficult to achieve :)
Yup no sympathy for battlefield if this game runs smoothly at launch I’m absolutely playing it. Battlefield can kick rocks.
You also don’t need a 4090 to play this game either thankfully
Bf3 vibes
... and it doesn't cost over $100 for an unfinished sh!t game to try out.
Sure its free but you really think, it wont need many updates to make it better/balance etc 🤷
@JayCord00 what multi-player game doesn't need those throughout their life though??? What's your point
@@JayCord00 But they ain't charging you 100 for a 20 experience, they charging you 0 for a 30 experience.
I like how grounded and solid everything is feeling in Delta Force.
Battlefield has the weightless, floaty feel sometimes.
i wonder what battlefield were u playing to feel like that because it certainly cannot be the same as I
I remember Delta Force back in the day being a great large scale shooter. I used to compare Battlefield to it. Funny how things change.
Mfw the Chinese knockoff is better than the real deal: 💀
temo battlefield might be cooking
I mean its sooo similar wish they stole a little bit more from bf4
It's the exact same game with a different name. Does it better😂😂 No , does it the exact same and you eat it up.😂
It's the exact same game with a different name. Does it better😂😂 No , does it the exact same, and you eat it up.😂
@@agtjackbauer bro wrote it twice 💀
The gun sounds and sprint animations look alot like mw2
Yes , you are right and its really bad in 2024.
This is a chinese game made using unreal engine 5 , they just marketing it good i believe
@@user-ex6nr9to6g the company who made this game did work for COD mobile so it would explain why sounds and animations look similar, most likely reusing some of the assets
@@dylankelly6189 They changed them
@@dylankelly6189 they were using animations from cod as place holders but recently they've updated them to their own. You've got to remember that this is the pre alpha
Because it quite literally is from MWII... Up until recently, they even had reload animations that were straight up ported from MW2019 and MWII, they only recently made their own animations but by the looks of it, the sprinting and firing animations are still from MWII. Now these are in fact CoD developers who made CoD Mobile so they most likely had access to all sorts of CoD assets.
the Delta Force franchise is older than the Battlefield one
Everyone should know this
How did I have to scroll this far to find this comment?
He is a clueless tuber what do you expect, their history of games ends at 2005. DF pioneered everything BF has become and lost.
Samsung is an older company than Apple. Does this mean that Apple has copied Samsung's phones ?
Tell me in which episode can I find dammage points stacking up and a skull showing up once I've killed an ennemy ? In which episode the exat same menu as in Battlefield 2042 ? The same HUD ?
@@ninokamps4407 DF invented this genre. Do your research please. Coming from a BF fan.
but guys look, the ui doesn't burn my eyes out. and you can read it. and there's actual weapon stats and more than 3 attachments. no way
People are criminally under looking the Tarkov like gunsmith. The fact that we have a high level gunsmith in a bf like game is insane. Not even CODs can match it
Right! I am so impressed with the customization. Also the fact that there’s a stash and flea market!
Delta Force even has Ammo & Health Stations scattered across per flags unlike 2042, which DICE can't even add and also have 40+ weapons that is still in the pre-alpha unlike 2042's 22+ weapon at launch...
Battlefield Hardline had this
Bf1942 had that but yea ...
It's identical to BF 2042, which itself is not a real Battlefield game.
I'd say this looks like MW if anything.
We dont need a good battlefield game. We need a Delta Force game similar to the original. Delta Force is older than Battlefield.
when you put them both side by side bf2042 looks like dev footage while delta force looks like the finished product 💀
I can't get over how the UI in 2042 looks like it was designed by a child in photoshop, it's atrocious
I thought I was the only one noticing, the UI is too colorful it feels like I'm playing fortnite or overwatch and not a world war 3-based game@@euphoreonz
Even has a better atmosphere, almost more realistic and gritty-looking compared to BF2042's plastic, pristine look. And it's free, and it has a campaign! I just hope this gives DICE a kick in the * and they realize we want a complete game if we're going to spend $70.
@@euphoreonz Not sure why this is a trend, the UI in Company of Heroes 3 is also REALLY bad and looks like alpha placeholder crap.
fr lmao
china sees battlefield "WRITE THAT DOWN WRITE THAT DOWN!!"
China sees anything*
They should've looked at what the battlefield community has been asking for (bf3 and bf4) and wrote that down.
that's pretty much all they do.
Does nobody here know that delta force was before battlefield
@@jkzamien These guys aren't in it for "the community". Do you think the EV manufacturers of China care about the environment and that's why they're making a fuckton of different EVs right now? No. It's about mass and money.
This game has 3 genre/gamemode though
-battlefield like
-extraction warzone DMZ/tarkov
-COD like
The main reason i want to play this is because of the Black Hawk Down remaster thats coming out with the game
Out of the all BFs they decided to copy 2042 UI. BRUUUUH
I just typed the SAME thing. Like who thought hey lets make a copy of the least liked BF game!!!!
but it looks good here? 2042 looks hideous but they actually finished theirs. Colours are similar, sure... but it's clean.
2042 ui looks shit and I can barely read it. This game though it actually looks clean and it's not ugly and glowing
Ikr!
I don't think this game (HAWK OPS) is gonna be successful unless they change it. Too many people already calling it a 2042 clone/knockoff, and that's gonna put a lot of weight on its reputation. I think Tencent is second to none when it comes to developing mobile shooters (though their games are not very controller friendly to say the least), and Arena Breakout Infinite looks good, even though I haven't played it because it's only on PC RN, but I don't know what they were thinking with this one......
Operators, specialists…these hero shooter arcade mechanics need to be removed from battlefield and its clones.
hate to break it to you, but BF has always been arcade.
@martsum398 bf3,4 & 1 were not arcade like compared to 5 & 6 FYI
Operators aren't bad you are just tired of bad games that happen to have operators in them.
@@heatnup i would prefer to play nameless soldier in mask and helmet covering his head and face rather than operator bs
@spartan_a1176 ehh battlefield 3,4 and 1 were definitely full arcade...squads not arcade armas not arcade and battlefield is nothing like them lol it's always been a casual arcade combined arms game
8:56 correction: it only uses ue5 in campaign, still ue4 in multiplayer.
For a minute there I thought Novalogic came back with a new version of Delta Force: Land Warrior.
Played that before BF1942 but '42 changed the landscape with all the vehicles.
And not a dice or EA logo in sight.
Beautiful.
HUD and mechanics of battlefield, and the gunplay of the modern call of duty games? Sign me the fu- wait they have a specialist system. Fuck that.
You like cod gunplay?
My same reaction. That specialist bs has no place in a game like this
it's a free game, I can handle a few abilities... much rather that than trashy fkn crossover skins and death effects. This looks far more interesting than 2042 or MWIII
@@Magicbeatz_YTcod gunplay is better than bfs lol that's why y'all favorite shit franchise have to copy cod 😂
@@Magicbeatz_YTwho doesn't? They undoubtedly have the most polished gunplay in the whole industry which is pretty clear when you consider how many games are trying to have CoD like gunplay.
EA is gonna be at the court like
"Can we just play a video?"
Then pulls up this video.
Give me weather effects, more physics and destruction; with a good update timeline coming with weapons, vehicles, maps and more features. I'm all in. we'll see.
I think the biggest positive a Free to Play Battlefield Clone has that if its successfull it will have many years of support and content unlike battlefield and call of duty which ususally only gets 1-2 years support even if its sucessfull.
Great point
Fucking bf5 smh
@@jgsource552in all honesty people didn't wanted to play it so DICE just cutted the support. For the first time it was fans mistake. Also game was hated until later when it became popular.
What a joke of community. They hated the game literally despised it in beginning and then it became the most played battlefield.
@@rokos.1239 well no one asked them to turn their depiction of ww2 into a screaming woman simulator with modern weapon attachments (because God forbid some zoomer needs to use traditional gun sights to aim)
@@KvltKommando what modern attachments are you even talking about??
Hyped. If our own companies refuse to give us what we want, foreign developers have a massive opportunity to sweep in and dominate the field. I wish them luck.
Agreed! It's like they went "fine, we'll do it ourselves like Thanos"
What did we not get in the new battlefield that in this game?
“Our own companies.” What does this even mean
@@spaceygnat19908 Working Mouse Input, wich is mindblowing that 2042`s one still delayed and glitchy to this date.
@@R17759 American/North American/Western World, one of those I presume.
At least they nailed the small implementations - Health bars in deployment screen, leaning, clear sights on guns.
These are only a few but simple additions that 2042 didnt have on launch and may not even have now
9:52 *that's upto the players and cheaters.
I’m not gonna complain it looks like a mix between cod and bf so should be good
Right.
Could* be good
It's like COD, 2042, and Tarkov had a baby. Brilliant.
More like COD MW (2020s), Battlefield series, Tarkov, and Chyner ravaged one another and bear babies...
like hitman and his 5 or 4 fathers I don't remember lol
How is this similar to Tarkov
@@theturkishprincethe gun smithing
Honestly from playing the closed alpha myself I’ve enjoyed it a fair bit! There’s some toning that needs to do but aside from that it’s honestly been a blast
DFHO looks like what we all thought BF2042 would be after we got 2042's reveal trailer
Just a note, it does feature dynamic destruction, big explosions can blow up holes in walls. Watching Jakfrag's video at one point a tank blew up a hole on the warehouse he was in, and it even destroyed a part of the ceiling. Also it was showcased in a devlog video I think.
Devs also said there will be terrain deformation in July 18 Alpha
This the real Battle Cod.
i dont care how similar it is to battlefield which you seem to be focusing on in this video, the main point is what has it done that battlefield hasnt done? what makes this stand out from battlefield? what does it do better because from what ive seen so far people say this is a better battlefield and im here for it. No hate intended im just curious as to why this is seems to do a better job.
The one distinction of all the similarities is that DFHO has it in the game even in pre alpha phase, while BF2042 had to patch many of these features after launch of the game ([scoreboard, marksman kill bonus, squad management] AAA studio vs third party devs --- SMH pretty sad)
Okay, but that weapon stat menu breakdown makes me salivate. It even has a recoil/shot placement chart that seems like it updates with attachments. Why is that much detail not standard across all of these games?
I love weapon customization
They fucked up! Who the fuck told them to copy paste bf2042 instead of bf3/4???
But based on player streams the gameplay is more like a BF4/COD hybrid.
If I cant vertically hover up skyscrapters im not sold.
I'm actually hyped for this. I welcome the competition.
Competition?
@@disknee6630 yes that's competition
@@disknee6630 All the battlefield youtubers wouldn’t talk about it if it wasn’t competing with Battlefield. So yea, competition.
@@BicBoi1984 Its not really competition if its a blatant copy. Its just the same thing.
@@stormdivision617 They talking cause its like the same game. I personally hated 2042 because it just didn’t even feel like a battlefield. This game just copies 2042 so its really just the same thing.
Me: Bro, can I copy your homework? Bro: Sure, bro. Just change a few things so it's not obvious.
Later:
Bro: MY BROTHER IN CHRIST! I SAID DON'T MAKE IT OBVIOUS!!!
This game is like combo of CoD MW 2019 and BF4 and i love it. Cannot wait for the release
Delta Force is earlier. Revenge after years to Activision and EA.
These are all things that any game that is trying to enter the market should be able to do.
If a game has "operators" instead of soldier classes then that's a hard pass for me.
He yapped for 10 mins about how delta is just ripping off battlefield, but didn't said about the actual "innovative elements" delta has over Battlefield.
>Better classes equipment and better balanced example - the medic can heal multiple players at once, not just 1 with a few shots.
>Delta has a Extraction mode which is designed and made well, its close to MWZ quality if not better lmao
>Better maps design compared to 2042, yes its less maps, only like 2 , but theyre good to play in and they are so beautiful and the gameplay on them feels good Quality over quantity.
>Delta has a strong gunsmith customisation that is very close to what we have in MW3
Many weapons at launch, many attachments and good level progression on the weapons with good awards such as better attachments
Battlefield 2042 had 2 guns at the launch lmao and theres like 4 attachments in the whole game, thats wild
And also explain how delta has in an alpha state more weapons than 2042 does after being finished ☠️
Overall Delta force might be a copy paste, but a good one
They added the battlefield elements, made them better, added some good UI design, improved the maps and here we go, a perfect Battlefield Formula everyone wants
oh also lol, delta is free, i think its enough for this to rip on battlefield
One of my favorite features of Delta Force is the "share loadout" option. It will give you a code, which your friend then can import, and it will automatically equip all the attachments. (If they're unlocked)
omg delta force was the og back in the days dude you couldve just looked it you its actually a remake of the orignial delta force hawk ops from early 90s and 2000s
dice released this game 3 years ago and was hated for it? but now people are foaming at the mouths for operators?
People just like new shiny games
people just want a decent modern battlefield
Nah, who said people like the operators?
Crazy ain't it? A more polished BF2042 clone and folks are now in love
Blatent copy? Yes. Do I care? No
Bro THAT PART!
Yeah but what makes wanna play this over 2042?
@@fxthePunisher Simple, it's free. Not that I'd personally play it but it's an obvious point, especially for those who don't even own BF2042
@@fxthePunisher because 2042 is still shit. And support was dropped
@Fivetin yeah but a copy of shit is also shit don't you reckon
I wish we had a game that’s part battlefield and part squad that’s a huge market right there !! And no company takes advantage of it cause they rather pursue ideas that are burnt out !
Copying or not, i haven't been this excited for a new FPS ever since BF1. Even with the gadgets bs, they still seem more fun to use than 2042. And the whole game and operators still have a military aesthetic.
8:37 I'm pretty sure there was a portion of Jack's video where destruction was seen. But it clearly was not as common as it is in most Battlefield games.
yes there is a bit of destruction on the maps but as you say it's not comparable to the old Battlefields. I would put it more on the level of Bf2042. You can break a few walls here and there, but the big basic structures can't be changed unfortunately. But that could also be due to the two maps. One is a relatively small map of a city in the desert, where it would be rather bad if you could destroy all the buildings. The other map has the feel of Iwo Jima from Battlefield V, but in a modern setting. Admittedly, there was already very little to hardly any destruction in BfV's Imo Jima.
They should be careful so they won't be sued for plagiarism, looks fun though.
They are in China. Who is going to sue them?
@@thelittledetailscr7231it doesn't matter where on the planet their base is. EA will sue them if they don't make changes. I thought this was BF 2042 first time I saw some gameplay, the similarities can't be denied by anyone at this point.
@@bjarnisThere is a reason that counterfeit items is so popular in China... The companies in China steal intellectual property all the time and they face no consequences.
@@bjarnisI mean we are talking a country that still has slavery and children working in factories. They aren’t known for their great ethics. 😂
@bjarnis Not true. Why don't the gun manufacturers sue Tarkov for using the real gun names without permission then? They can't. Battlestate is in Russia.
In my opinion, it seems they are focusing more on making a functional game rather than being innovative. I've seen many people complain and wish for Battlefield to return to its roots for years now. Hopefully, EA wakes up, and the next Battlefield doesn't fizzle out immediately.
Delta Force Sep. 1998. Battlefield 1942 2002.
Yeah.
Battlefield got ruined once it became fast pace the last game that was good out of this franchise was BF4
yes and no, battlefield 1 was a masterpiece but out of all the battlefields i played BF4 the most and for good reason, that game is by far the best BF game to date.
@@blakemccruden9228 yeah Battlefield 1 was a good one also. it definitely was better than the newest one
BF1 was the last best
@@brianv1988 Battlefield 1 was a good *one*, nice one there partner
BF1 was awesome and BFV was also good towards the latter part after updates.
There's always a bigger fish!
I've been exhausted by the "operator" bullshit for years already, and this looks more like a BF2042 copy/paste than a real BF experience. Instantly disinterested.
As an og battlefield player, this looks like COD to me, but unfortunately battlefield tried to copy COD in recent years after COD copied battlefield in 2019. So sad. Hope the game is good though.
I'm excited. This game looks fun. so far it looks like what a successful 2042 would look like. And besides, if this game actually does end up being real competition for battlefield, then thats only good for us as players. DICE would then realize that they need to step up their game to keep their players. Lets just hope for the best.
Battlefield but it also steals your information... nice xD
LOOOL
As if EA isn't selling your data at every opportunity.
Thats cute, EA and UA-cam already do that.
USA based companies have been doing this for way longer, but you aren't noisy about that huh
At this point I want a Battlefield game that is not from DICE. Since BF3 they released their games in an alpha state and at the point it got to a true release state the next slop got dropped and the one with the at that point decent gameplay got left behind. So yeah im so done with DICE it is not even funny...
What are you even on about lol. 'Looking similar' means jack and wont stand in court as it doesn't feature any trademarked characters. Design similarities is actually deliberate and a good thing cos that makes a new game easier to get into. UA-camrs gotta cook up drama outta nothing huh
Yeah, that's like sueing World War 3 for having glowsticks on soldiers
Maybe now DICE will actually give us what we want now that we have options.
This game looks like a straight copy of 2042
When a game is made to look as realistic as possible then there’s no real artistic design, it’s just realistic design. So anyone else that decides to make a realistic shooter will end up looking and playing very similarly. BF is not an artistic game and doesn’t do anything to stand out visually, which is fine but other games will be similar by nature.
If EA wants battlefield to stay relevant they really need to nail the next title. They also really need to mitigate people choosing to play this, they should consider making 2042 free to play. Maybe give anyone who bought it getting all cosmetics and a 20% discount on the next title.
Kinda feels like bf3 Back to Karkan dlc. I am really enjoying this game.
Thank you for calling a spade a spade
I'd like it more without the 3d spotting. Such a cheap mechanic. There's a reason I still play in hardcore servers when I play bf4
I'm sorry, but both turrets at 4:30 look nothing alike, you're stretching the truth here... (unless you're talking about mechanics, but you said 'looks' not 'works')
Apart that, the rest seems more fair. To be fair, a free, decent BF clone still sounds not bad, considering how recent BF games are approached. Personally I am more interested in the extraction mode, not those 20v20 games or whatever.
That turret isn't even a gadget, it's a stationary weapon
Nice. Since EA has forgotten what this franchise is about its nice to see another developer take up the blue print I love and enjoyed.
I bought 2042 for 12€ in a steam sale and refunded it. I am an assault player / medic and nearly all my teammates where grey old women... including me.
Courts have already ruled that genre's and similarities between games isn't grounds for lawsuit
Only reason the kill icon is different its because u cant have skulls in china
You absolutely can, Battlefield 2042 had a launch in China.
Once again, the old glories of battlefield streamers return to the new battlefield competitor. Hopefully, this Delta Force will get the Battlefield team pumping and working hard to have a great title.
As I absolutely hate Tencent as a company and the disgusting way they copied everything from Battlefield for their game, I feel the same way to EA / DICE on how they neglected the Battlefield franchise far too long.
I hope this will be a wake-up call to EA / DICE on making a real Battlefield game and to also start listening to their community on what WE want and not what the investors want.
Good. People wanted a better Battlefield game not made by DICE. And we all know EA is never going to sell the rights, so here is the next best option for Battlefield fans.
What 2042 should've been...
No. Both 2042 and DF are awful as BF games
I don’t remember people wanting 2042 to be a specialist cod
What is different about this game?
What's the difference 😐
They have boats?
Yes
Yes, but only on one of the 2 maps (well, the other is a desert map so it fits) and on the other map it's more like BfVs Iwo Jima. So wait and see and lower your expectations a bit.
dice lost the technology
Silly to even think for a second that this was made for competition. EA left money on the table.
this pre alpha seems way better than bf42 in its current stat, maps guns ect
This is more battlefield than the last battlefields.
No more to say.
In what ways
You meant BF1? Nope.
This is another 2042
Battlefield is 2002 and Delta Force is 1998. You were born yesterday, don't talk sheit you have no idea about. Educate yourself!
At first I was like "It's an army game, of course there will be a few things similar!", then the list started......Oh boy!! 😆😂
Imo, battlefield has no right to claim an entire subgenre of fps. Like yea all of those are similar, but thode are just things that make this kind of shooter work
RIP Battlefield
More like rip Delta Force. It's just another free game that's probably gonna be full with P2W and other micro transaction crap, plus a blatant amount of cheaters, which the devs probably won't care about since the game is owned by Tencent. Honestly it looks way more like COD than Battlefield.
@@SwedishTrollo wow man, why are you defending battlefield, the game is trash, i was a hardcore battlefield fan until after battlefield 1, i miss the old battlefield and the game just doesn't look like fun at all, this game on the other hand seems like an absolute blast, im actually excited to play this game, the game is in alpha and already has many many more features compared to when 2042 was released, you're riding a dead horse my guy.
@@blakemccruden9228 Who said I'm defending it? I only enjoy Battlefield 4 these days.
@@SwedishTrollo you replied to a comment that said RIP battlefield.....
@@blakemccruden9228 I'm just predicting how the game will end. The Finals was a popular free game too with battle pass and micro transcation. How much has the playerbase dropped on Steam since the release? From 200k to 10k. World War 3 was another super hyped game but it failed miserably. How many people are playing that game today? When it comes to free games with micro transcations then they tend to be less liked than bought games. I have seen how games like Delta Force usually end up.
They copied 2042 and mw. But 2042 isn't even real BF game, so let them have fun. Although I'm yet to see any f2p rip off from China that didn't failed bc of mtx. And for the love of god will people stop saying "this is what 2042 should've been". No, no it isn't! 2042 should've been classic BF, without fucking operators, abilities, weird call ins etc. Both 2042 and DF are awful as BF games
But Battlefield 5 has call ins wdym
@@totalguardian1436 Where did I, or any of the veteran players for that matter, said BF5 was good BF game? Even BF1, which is maybe the best casual mp fps of 2010's, falls short for classic BF game.
@@stoniptfosupersonic Many Battlefield fans say that Battlefield 5 is underrated and is 100x better than 2042
@@totalguardian1436 Many BF fans are BF1 rookies. Which was the whole point for dice. Dumb down a game a little to bring more players. BF 5 is a good solid game on its own. BF 1 is great game on its own. But as a pure BF game they both fall short. I agree they are both miles ahead of 2042 as games and I would even argue as BF games. But that isn't saying much since 2042 is one of the worst mp fps games made in the last 15+yrs. But that doesn't mean 2042 should have been like DF, or even BF1 and 5. It should have been classic BF game, for long standing fans who were with a franchise since early beginnings, long before BF1. So called love letter, as dice called it.
@@stoniptfosupersonic How is BF1 not a BF game? Explain
This is Bf4 with the steroids and themes from 2042, but unlike DICE they KNOW how to make things good and simple
This game looks way better than a Triple A title… sad day for battlefield…
It looks grittier than current Battlefield which I think is needed for the next bf game
Until you see female operator with a compound bow shooting recon arrows and male operator with robotic hand grenade launcher in this game…
I hope they removed the operators.
@@kn03ee Battlefield 4 had bows. It's not robotic
Do people around you know you just now heard the name Delta Force?!
Do you have any friends (to set you straight when you' dumb)?!
I bet you're fun at parties (with ideas such as these)!
“Ok you can copy my homework but don’t make it look exactly the same”
So glad Delta Force is keeping you in first person when you go down. That gave a great level of immersion in BFV that 2042 got rid of...