I believe NCAP should up their AEB for padestrians and Safety assists tests. They should perform additional tests with people running out in the street at more complex situations such as at slight hills, turns and busier roads to see if the car doesn't start ignoring the mannequins/people when there are many things going on. That should be the next step to test a higher range of situations that are also more likely to occur.
They should really change there rating system. Stars have always been associated with crash worthiness but now it’s way more than that. They should do something similar to the IIHS
@@spaghetti9067 it was said in a dateline interview with IIHS that a regular moderate overlap crash simulates two cars within 500 pounds weight difference hitting eachother both going around 38 miles an hour.
It depends on the weight of the second vehicle. If it is the same weight or lower then it will be a easier crash. It it is considerable heavier then it will be a more severe crash.
я считаю что euro ncap подсуживают результаты тестов.. к примеру: Volvo xc40 recharge набрала в тесте безопасности помощи водителю 89%, хотя если вы посмотрите видео, то она даже не реагирует на маникен ребенка, просто тупо его збивая... при этом всё на это закрывают галаза и ставят 89%. В этом же автомобиле системе безопасности помощи водителю ставят оценку в 82% хотя система срабатывает идеально и тормозит раньше чем Volvo в том обзоре... Ну как-то так
Bom dia a todos pelo mundo. Meu comentário tardio: SE FIZEREM ESTE TESTE COM O QUÊ É FABRICADO NO BRASIL, O PEDAL DO FREIO DE ESTACIONAMENTO ENTRA PELA PERNA DO DUMMY ( O NOSSO E BEM TOSCO NE TOYOTA? )
@@edrumsense Good morning Edrum. Friend, see if you agree: (And a tremendous lack of respect for Brazilian consumers) Selling here the same car that sells abroad. With so many differences in technologies and finishing. PEDAL PARKING BRAKE. And well FLINSTONS!!! Por gentileza...responda em ( PORTUGUÊS ) Thank you, please!
@@itsAlphaFox It's directly linked with the annual death toll of pollution. Car pollution also has a death toll. "Harvard Chan School’s Department of Environmental Health. The study was published online December 13, 2021 in the journal PNAS. /.../ The researchers also estimated that deaths attributable to air pollution due to vehicle emissions dropped from 27,700 in 2008 to 19,800 in 2017. The decrease in deaths was not as large as researchers expected, because many factors offset the progress in reducing emissions, such as a larger and aging population, larger vehicles replacing smaller ones, and more miles traveled per vehicle. On the other hand, the authors noted, if vehicles were still emitting at 2008 levels, those emissions would have caused 48,200 deaths attributable to air pollution. (I precise, this study is just about the USA car emission deaths)
@@boboutelama5748 Energy/fuel consumption, while usually related to emissions, is not the most reliable and consistent data for that. There are other aspects that can lower emissions or increase consumption, without changing the other. It's best to measure the carbon emissions directly
Really 😂😂😂😂 , any thing related to people must be under measurement and control, others like ( nuclear, weapons industries, bombs,etc) are out of coverage area ,,
@@MegaKhaled1986 😅😅🤣😂😄. You are under the impression something is funny there. There are peoples dying right now from pollution that isn't necessary in the slightest and isn't aknowledged in any way when a car is bought. It should be very logical that peoples polluting more should help peoples that didn't asked for it and became sick the the extention of the user's behavior. We perfectly do it for guns, for oil spills and for common accidents, but we, strangely, always miss to catch the ball when it comes to pollution emmissions.
I believe NCAP should up their AEB for padestrians and Safety assists tests. They should perform additional tests with people running out in the street at more complex situations such as at slight hills, turns and busier roads to see if the car doesn't start ignoring the mannequins/people when there are many things going on.
That should be the next step to test a higher range of situations that are also more likely to occur.
Should, should, should. Ok, you should study and do it your way.
They should really change there rating system. Stars have always been associated with crash worthiness but now it’s way more than that. They should do something similar to the IIHS
@@cityplanner3063 It's a safety rating not a crash rating. It's more than reasonable to include all aspects of safety in the rating.
Also situations that involve motobike should be more complex
NCAP should raise the hight of the crash barriers to align with the increase of higher riding vehicles (SUVs, crossovers and large Utes
The height if the crash barrier is designed to represent the hight of real world things like a barrier
It really looks amazing. All cars should have min theese feature as standards before allowing onto the roads.
Wow, this SUV is solid!
auto experts started talking in the comments ehehe
Where is this vehicle manufactured?
Japan..Thai version is meant for Asian countries
In USA as well
This is made in Alabama United States then exported from Port of mobile for Europe the same Factory where it is produce also makes Mazda CX-50
@@EpicThe112 for europe you say
@Norwegianization correct and it's also the same for the United States Market Alabama
how come this suv didn't get 95 on all tests?
This eu spec well built
No brasil não tem pré tensionador do cinto de segurança e limitador de carga para os cintos traseiros! por isso não comprei.
When it's going to come in India...
which is worse, a moderate overlap crash test into a fixed barrier at 40mph, or two vehicles hitting offset going 35 like in this video?
The two into each other at 35 bc it gives a higher combined impact force
@@spaghetti9067 it was said in a dateline interview with IIHS that a regular moderate overlap crash simulates two cars within 500 pounds weight difference hitting eachother both going around 38 miles an hour.
It depends on the weight of the second vehicle.
If it is the same weight or lower then it will be a easier crash.
It it is considerable heavier then it will be a more severe crash.
Seems much better than the ASEAN version.
In Asia they have the Premium Safety model as an option. Same, same.
Man why do all Toyotas fail the side pole so bad??
Europe version of any new toyota would fail in IIHS front small-owerlap tests in the IIHS (USA). Europe side airbags are much shorter 😢
This Car Could Beat Teslas
я считаю что euro ncap подсуживают результаты тестов.. к примеру: Volvo xc40 recharge набрала в тесте безопасности помощи водителю 89%, хотя если вы посмотрите видео, то она даже не реагирует на маникен ребенка, просто тупо его збивая... при этом всё на это закрывают галаза и ставят 89%. В этом же автомобиле системе безопасности помощи водителю ставят оценку в 82% хотя система срабатывает идеально и тормозит раньше чем Volvo в том обзоре... Ну как-то так
Good
Bom dia a todos pelo mundo.
Meu comentário tardio: SE FIZEREM ESTE TESTE COM O QUÊ É FABRICADO NO BRASIL, O PEDAL DO FREIO DE ESTACIONAMENTO ENTRA PELA PERNA DO DUMMY
( O NOSSO E BEM TOSCO NE TOYOTA? )
Well, a friend survived a 2 big truck sandwich in a brazilian model, his family only suffered minor injuries
@@edrumsense Good morning Edrum.
Friend, see if you agree: (And a tremendous lack of respect for Brazilian consumers) Selling here the same car that sells abroad. With so many differences in technologies and finishing. PEDAL PARKING BRAKE. And well FLINSTONS!!!
Por gentileza...responda em ( PORTUGUÊS ) Thank you, please!
Well at least the new innova should be much better in terms of safety since it was based on this car
Maybe side impac is'nt good as this. Since its longer and heavier
How the fuck it got "good " in side impact😊
Not as good that Toyota must be 😮
日本国内も一緒の仕様だよね
new delivery car toyota cross in showroom
i'm like toyota corolla cross
😊🎉
So which crash would you die from?
1.8G one is white and one is black
No, they are 2.0 hybrid fwd cars. The 1.8G variant doesn't have toyota safety sense. This test covers 2.0 hev awd/fwd and 1.8 hev fwd.
Так собі недуже безпечно
🤔👍🏻
Nowadays, everything is "cross".
The NCAP really needs to add "energy+fuel consumption" into the official death count per vehicle.
What does fuel consumption have to do with deaths lol? Also apparently someone managed to hypermile 3.3L/100km
@@itsAlphaFox It's directly linked with the annual death toll of pollution. Car pollution also has a death toll.
"Harvard Chan School’s Department of Environmental Health. The study was published online December 13, 2021 in the journal PNAS.
/.../
The researchers also estimated that deaths attributable to air pollution due to vehicle emissions dropped from 27,700 in 2008 to 19,800 in 2017. The decrease in deaths was not as large as researchers expected, because many factors offset the progress in reducing emissions, such as a larger and aging population, larger vehicles replacing smaller ones, and more miles traveled per vehicle. On the other hand, the authors noted, if vehicles were still emitting at 2008 levels, those emissions would have caused 48,200 deaths attributable to air pollution.
(I precise, this study is just about the USA car emission deaths)
@@boboutelama5748 Energy/fuel consumption, while usually related to emissions, is not the most reliable and consistent data for that. There are other aspects that can lower emissions or increase consumption, without changing the other. It's best to measure the carbon emissions directly
Really 😂😂😂😂 , any thing related to people must be under measurement and control, others like ( nuclear, weapons industries, bombs,etc) are out of coverage area ,,
@@MegaKhaled1986 😅😅🤣😂😄.
You are under the impression something is funny there. There are peoples dying right now from pollution that isn't necessary in the slightest and isn't aknowledged in any way when a car is bought. It should be very logical that peoples polluting more should help peoples that didn't asked for it and became sick the the extention of the user's behavior.
We perfectly do it for guns, for oil spills and for common accidents, but we, strangely, always miss to catch the ball when it comes to pollution emmissions.
Недуже
TESLA is totaly better !!!
Tesla fanboy running out in the wild.
in term of selling price.... better for rich guy
@@vxllfire fanboy of the better cars for safety!!! And technology, and efficiently, and performance... What's else???
@@paulogomes8762 fanboy of poor build quality and overrated car.
bruh, Tesla is way more expensive than a Corolla Cross why are you comparing it? it's not even in the same class
not an outstanding score for a brand new car
just disappointment
why?
Why? This is a great vehicle...
understood. you are so dissapointed over your own feeling that toyota is a suck car...
Chinese cars performed better 😢
😂😂😂😂😂😂