When to Use Additive vs Subtractive EQ
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 бер 2018
- In this Vlog, I discuss the popular topic of when to use additive and subtractive EQ. I show you some great methods and dispel some really dumb myths.
slatedigital.com/vlog/
slatedigital.com/
stevenslatedrums.com/
www.slatemt.com/
/ slate. .
/ slatedigital
/ slateproaudio
Song credit:
"I Promise," composed, produced and recorded by Florian Schartner
The project: open.spotify.com/artist/0G0Iq...
Really appreciate this video. I especially like the point of "don't remove anything if it doesn't need it" that's something I try to make a point of to my audience too. I've been saving up for a Raven and VMS and I'm continually impressed with your whole company. Thanks again 😀
Take love, Michael. Your FL studio template using slate digital plugins introduced me with them. Now sometimes for me it's tricky to choose plugins from iZotope, T Racks and Slate Digital within seconds. ^_^
That beautiful feeling when you can predict almost the exact eq setting he will/wont do, you heart starts pumping and you feel like you're really finally starting to understand things... I love these videos by the way and the everything bundle!
this guy not only delivers the best plugins of the scene but also his tutorials are the most clear and concise of all, bravo
First of all, THE SLATE EVERYTHING BUNDLE has totally transformed the quality of my projects. I've been engoineering since the 70's. Bravo!!! There's a subtlety to the plugins that feels like a scalpel instead of a chainsaw. As a dad and grandpa, I try to say things to my young folks that they can grasp immediately and walk away with the essence of what I'm trying to say. This particular video did just that. It gives folks a simple concept that they will use forever. Bravo again
These misconceptions were something that really held my mixing back for a long time. It wasn't till I watched CLA mix that I realized you don't have to follow those silly rules. Great to see you spelling it out so clearly from others who may have been held back as well. PS. That 15k boost on the custom series eq is soooooo good for adding air to a vocal.
Really good one Steven. Sometimes no matter how long you've been doing something, hearing a little tweak to how we look at something is gold. I love it.
Ive just discovered Steven Slate and Slate plugins thanx to the free bus compressors I downloaded, and I must say, I absolutely love his 'to the point' and 'no nonsense' approach to things. Ive been engineering for 30 years and I believe I can learn a lot from this guy. And their plug ins are great as well.
People who can't mix also can't listen. Opening your ears and mind are essential.
Thanks so much. A great amount of data put in simple, concise words. Too many people will talk for 10 minutes and not say a thing. You have mastered a great teaching method.
These Vlog posts are so dope, thank you for taking the time to do this.
Thanks for getting right to the point. You've done in 6 minutes what many others take 20 minutes for. Always a pleasure to hear what you hear and apply strategies to make it sound better.
I like that, you teach perspective/assessment, instead of absolute Theory.
Yep, I hate hearing "you should always" ..right there I cut the person off and say..it depends LOL.
This is a fantastic way to think about EQ. You've put into words how I approach my mixes, and I'm sure this is going to help a bunch of people. When I first started producing 10 years ago I can remember feeling guilty any time I went to make a boost!
Hey i will just say you guys did an amazing job with the FG-stress, im very happy with the all access, cheers from Denmark!
Great video. Glad to see how I work with EQ is the same way you do, but seeing a refresher on EQ always helps keep my head sharp when using it so thanks for the vid.
Great job! You’re an awesome teacher. This is what we call in Electrical Engineering K.I.S.S keep it simple stupid. There’s beauty in simplicity and you don’t over complicate things which I like.
Steven, that is by far the best way I have ever heard that explained!
I would love to see some examples of EQing in context. Your tutorials are excellent and I've learned a ton, but you tend to always demonstrate EQ changes in solo, while reminding us to EQ in context, even in the Audio Legends rock course. Could we see some more real-world mixing in a future vlog? I've LOVED the vlog so far. Keep it up!
Good work my guy. Love the mix screen bruh. Gonna start tuning in more often, bn mixin songs for bout 14yrs now. Always willing to keep learning from the pros.
Great explanation. I've been using Steven's samples for years, and they really are the best in the business.
Thanks for clearing that up and simplifying it. Great video and awesome studio!!
Excellent statements to distill EQing down to "use your hearing" - the essence of the art. Kudos!
Great job Maestro! Straight as an arrow. By far the best tutorial on SlateTV channel imo. :)
Thanks mate, really helpful. The ''too much [-], not enough [-]' (in that order) is a very helpful first principle. (Another helpful tip I found in my investigation was to 'cut narrow (ie 'too much [-]'), and boost wide (ie 'not enough [-]'); these two principles helped no end. Cheers
hey steven, great video, very interesting, I am already enjoying and practicing with my raven mti2 console and the plugins bundle. Thanks for the contents of your videos.
Great video, and beautiful studio! Keep up the great work bro.
I thought this was excellent Steven. Shows that knowing what to tweak is the most important tool of all. Really enjoyed it.
Straight to the point great job always been saying what you said for years
I honestly love these videos.
Great video, and can't wait to hear the entire finished remix of this song.
Felt good to guess what you’d cut and boost, and get most of them right.
Only thing I didn’t get was to do nothing in the cut for the vocal. Made so much sense though. Great tips!
I'm loving the vlogs. Please keep them coming!
I want to know who down thumbed and why? If someone disagree's they should be asking questions not just down thumbing
Thank you Steven! Keep ‘em coming!
Nice one mate. I like the blank statement. Adds a purpose to your mix.
One useful thought exercise i like is to imagine a boost as a cut to everything else, and imagine a cut as a boost to everything else. When cutting one thing, ask self "do i want to boost all that other stuff?". When boosting one thing, ask self "do i want to cut all that other stuff?".
Use the autogain feature on the FabFilter Pro Q2 to exercise this concept in real life
I say this to myself too. Damn, I honestly felt like I was the only one who thought of this. Also, I have to remind myself that with certain analog emulated EQs, a boost could add more than what is being boosted. So there's that also.
holy shit. thats one way to look at it. Nice.
If you already know what Steven will do to the "_blank" before he takes action and you are not yet a professional music producer, then i guess you should change your job and study sound engineering...thank you for this simple and effective videos, which might be one of the best EQ tutorials i have ever seen....and damn what a desk!!!
Excellent as always.
Excellent advice. Straightforward. Thanks Steve!
Good stuff as always. Keep 'em coming!
Can not believe this video has been on the internet for 6 years and somehow I missed it...
The best line in this vlog was "It needs nothing here" (referring to the vocal cut). Too many think that they always have to turn a knob. Great vlog. Keep them coming. Musicmaniac
True!! But I think that part was absolutely subjective - listening to it I felt there was too much boxiness - as such I would have subtracted some lows. But again, it's taste. But Steve was on point though!
how about letting them know that you should level match before comparing A to B? otherwise your brain most likely will choose louder over better.
Thanks Steve, great subject for a vlog!
Super informative. The most valuable lesson is at the last example!
Anyone else find it strange he uses protools but the thumbnail for the video shows logic's stock eq..? Not even one of the slate EQ's?
Huge slate fan, great vid as always, if you haven't gone Slate-Unlimited yet then you need to.
Loved that. I'm enjoying these vlogs.
Love it Slate, you the man!
That myth always bugged me. You're just changing relative gain of different frequency bands so a standard digital EQ gives the exact same result whether boosting or cutting. You should do more audio forum myth busting!
well the reason they say that boosting bears worse results than cutting is that an EQ is basically a shitty amplifier and by boosting certain frequencies you gain more noise as well, while when you cut you do not gain noise. But yeah I don't see why you should never boost
I can see the sense if you have a crap hardware EQ, but the forum dummies say the same for clean software EQ.
it's not about the software it's about the source signal
Then the net gain is identical whether boosting or cutting (given identical filter shapes).
Lmao that set up is the most beautiful thing I've ever seen and I'm jealous 🤣
Great video. I do this in live mixing all the time. Basically summed it all up! I find myself EQ cutting just to cut sometimes heh... but hey... perfectionist.
There it is thanks for what you guys do man
that studio set up is B E A-utiful
Thanks a lot Steven. You couldn't have made it more simple and clear for me ;)
Love your Vlog!
Thanks, Steven!
I happen to come across this video in a link in ny email, I’m assuming because i have subscription for the everything bundle, but I’m really glad I saw the email and watched this video. As a rookie audio engineer and amateur pornstar that has only been mixing for about a year and a half or so, I hear those and read those same
Myths all the time that Pros cut and while the inexperience boost etc and those other myths and as someone who’s in the early learning stages it can really make me feel insecure about my EQ decisions and in turn feel insecure about my Mixing decisions and set off a chain reaction ending with a poor mix.. because if I’m supposed to boost something but I don’t because I feel it’s unprofessional then I try to compensate by trying to get an “EQ Result” by trying a lot of other plug in like compression and saturation and maybe reverb or distortion etc etc and like I said it ends in a bad and poor mix and leaves me feeling discouraged and when really a simple boost would’ve saved my mix and confidence... so I really appreciate it Steve..
straight to the point :) , but i think it's the most difficult thing to feel ....thank's anyway !
So much cleared up in such a short time span
Where can I find the music at the end of this Video? Can't find it anywhere else~
The link in the description not working.
Hi, Steven. Please help me to understand some problem with eq. I have low-end timpani in my mix, it appears from time to time and sounds nice overall, but analyser Levels shows me that i have a problem with kick and bass. What must i do? Is this problem at all?
Great lesson! It's really hard to realize what it's missing and what is in need. As the vocals exemple tell us, if there's nothing to subtract, don't do nothing. Same for additive EQ.
Great tip Steven! Thanks!
yes Steven , good vid
What the name of the application use to play on bottom of the screen.. anyone knows.. I am trying not I find it
Good video. Gonna share this with one of the audio groups i admin 🙏
Well done! Thanks Steven!
great tutoria Steven, l never thought to do the cuts first. makes sense.
Thanks for the excellent advice for us eager to learn sponge minded souls. I love your products! Create onward...
+SlateTV, Hi Guys .., any progress news on WHEN the FG-X (2) will be released ?
.., been waiting patiently so far , but anxious as the promise for it is already 'Years Old'
Thanks for bringing back what was common knowledge before youtube.. I spent all day yesterday trying to figure out what the frequency cutters were saying. Sorry, but adding highs to a vocal by cutting just thins out the good stuff without adding what i wanted to hear.
Wise words to live by!
Is it better cut first then boost...vice versa or there is no rule?
Simple and effective. Thank you
Good tip. Simple, but good.
Great advices as always. I would add: when to use a shelve vs a HPF/LPF? Like the difference between there is too much blank vs there is unnecessary blank. I see too much students using a HPF/LPF instead of a shelve EQ. Custom EQ filters and FG-S shelves are so complementary imho.
Any change you make to a track changes the entire balance of the mix. Think of your mix as balancing on the head of a pin. Now you're changing something. How well does it balance after you make those changes?
Loving your studio with you massive touch screen monitor how much and where from :)
Best advice about EQ!
This was solid!
That digital console is everything
Please do a vlog about Equalizing orchestra music or certain orchestra instruments. Thank you!
Thanks for the knowledge man!!
Straight from your spaceship, thanks.
Good advice Stephen
Nice studio & sharp haircut 👍
This video nailed it. Thanks
How can I train myself in identifying which frequencies need to be fixed? Any shortcut or exercise to improve this? BTW, thanks for the video. Really helpful!
Brilliant !!
Are those touch screens really useful to mix and do music stuff on? My experience with it is that its generally fairly inaccurate when it comes to fine tuning, in this case fine tuning EQ.
Great Job !
The sentence trick is really helpful, don't you think the substractive/additive eq should be a a 2 steps process, substractive with surgical eq and then additive with "character eq" ? First one before compression and then the second after?
The quick answer, in most EQ's it doesn't matter as long as you volume compensate so your ears aren't fooled. For this reason the Free SlickEQ by TokyoDawn is my favorite eq to use quickly.
simple but very valid , great vid
Well that simplifies things and goes along with that sage advice of "Use your ears"
this guy needs to return some video tapes
Easy explanation. Thanks!
an eq is just a freq dependent volume control..plus initial eq you do solo'd fine tuning you do with the track..additionally you usually use definitive reductive eq that you won't change BEFORE a compressor and additive after as if you change eq you change gain which affects you compressor threshold.. and why add what the compressor will see and push down? as an added thing to think about... it's easier to hear what needs to be taken out by sweep BOOSTING the eq then removing
First of all a comp will not take down just what you added unless you use multi band one. If level rises it will take down whole signal. On the other hand the similar happens when you cut on EQ - level drops and your comp stops working.
That's why you can use trims on EQ or just readjust your comp after you EQed. Or just use EQ after comp whenever it suits better. Or if you use a filter on a comp input EQ may not affect compression... or... or...
yes subtractive decreases gain that's why i used the term "definitive" reduction pre compressor [ i don't move it so i have no threshold change]..do i add some of that back post compresser on occasion? yes!...but in 43 years it's kinda tale chasing if you constantly change a pre comp eq and tehn have to do threshold changes..and then where? low and low mids have diff attack values pre expectation than dealing with adding or cutting transients by fast or slight delyaed attack values..it becomes a stupid mind fawk..my motto is get it as great as possible at the mic/ instrument..then tweak with the gear
Mike Tarsia I’m glad to see you’re so confident in your rules.
"the most dumbest thing i´ve ever heard..." i love this video, thank you Steven!
Tanks alot Steve u make Thing very eazy
damn about time....someone put it that way..
Right on!