Short Barreled Rifle Vs Pistol Brace

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,3 тис.

  • @dmcrim624
    @dmcrim624 4 роки тому +662

    My main takeaway from this is that if the ATF doesn't say you can't then you should never ask if you can.

    • @Mrjackietreehorn
      @Mrjackietreehorn 3 роки тому +16

      100%

    • @Roberta_Esposito
      @Roberta_Esposito 3 роки тому +23

      Easier to beg for forgiveness than ask for permission

    • @percyfaith11
      @percyfaith11 3 роки тому +12

      What kind of answer did the weenies that asked expect to get from the weenies that answered?

    • @CJRKENT7697
      @CJRKENT7697 3 роки тому +3

      What is you thought on the THORDSEN Cheek rests. They don’t call themselves a brace, just a cheek rest. I have had one years ago but sold the AR pistol years ago. just bought a new Upper and a separate lower and was thinking about using Thordsen

    • @SamBrickell
      @SamBrickell 3 роки тому +8

      Why would you ever ask anyways??? You're not free if you ask for "permission" to do things (as long as they don't actually hurt others).

  • @DarrLaw
    @DarrLaw 8 місяців тому +9

    I'm a lawyer who has spent quite a bit of time in the past few months learning about firearms. Like many lawyer, I like to keep an eye on the cases coming out of SCOTUS, and with two big cases coming up this year, I figured it was time that I start learning about stuff like this: bump stocks, SBRs, pistol braces, etc.
    Your video has been one of the most helpful. Thank you!

  • @brandonwilcox7411
    @brandonwilcox7411 4 роки тому +1601

    Defund the ATF. Repeal the NFA.

    • @toonstierney1170
      @toonstierney1170 4 роки тому +41

      Shall not be infringed 😅

    • @LIKEDBUTTONPluto
      @LIKEDBUTTONPluto 4 роки тому +8

      He said no opinions 😝

    • @randominternetuser2888
      @randominternetuser2888 4 роки тому +38

      Obama expanded firearms ownership rights more than trump and Reagan who restricted firearms ownership.
      Look it up.
      But yeah, the atf are the totally the problem 🙄

    • @GIJOE573
      @GIJOE573 4 роки тому

      @@toonstierney1170 news flash: you already are

    • @toonstierney1170
      @toonstierney1170 4 роки тому

      @@GIJOE573YUUUUP

  • @larrymartin1834
    @larrymartin1834 3 роки тому +196

    This guy is a teacher, meaning he ca actually teach. His thoughts are well organized and easy to understand. If you watch you will actually learn something.
    Thanks

    • @specguy1
      @specguy1 3 роки тому +5

      Chris Baker is not only an expert on the subject but is a gifted teacher who knows how to hold the attention of the viewer.

    • @mve9924
      @mve9924 3 місяці тому

      Lolol. I know many dozens of "teachers" that cant explain how to tie shoes....just sayin'.

  • @mr.papalaka374
    @mr.papalaka374 4 роки тому +448

    The bottom line: The NFA is ridiculous, the 2A SHOULD supercede everything.

    • @hintoflimetostitochip7978
      @hintoflimetostitochip7978 4 роки тому +8

      agreed

    • @Savage1776_
      @Savage1776_ 4 роки тому +7

      Nope 2020...people's feelings RULE!

    • @nicholashoward3967
      @nicholashoward3967 4 роки тому +7

      it does. sue the nfa into oblivion...

    • @robtrindade9087
      @robtrindade9087 4 роки тому +4

      *does

    • @thomast8539
      @thomast8539 4 роки тому +12

      A little bit of lost freedom (NFA laws to prevent everyone from becoming Bonnie/Clyde or Al Capone) to gain a little bit of security...oh wait, the NFA laws did not stop criminals from committing crimes, did they?

  • @ducktapepilot
    @ducktapepilot 4 роки тому +200

    We're in a sad place when the legislature asks the ATF to clarify the law.

    • @phillhuddleston9445
      @phillhuddleston9445 4 роки тому +6

      Clarify meaning create new laws.

    • @John1911
      @John1911 4 роки тому +8

      Sad indeed. Congress has abdicated it responsibly, and potential political accountability to voters, to The Administrative state.
      Which is a fundamental crisis in how our government currently functions.
      Regards,
      Marky

    • @ducktapepilot
      @ducktapepilot 4 роки тому +7

      @@JBJHonez Exactly. Also, my question is when did the ATF get the ability to make law? The Constitution says only congress can make law. Our politicians have sold out the American people

    • @John1911
      @John1911 4 роки тому +3

      @@ducktapepilot You see this quite a bit in government. Congress writes a bill that will say something that gives bureaucrats the authority to make techicnal decisions and changes as needed.
      Regards,
      Marky

    • @phillhuddleston9445
      @phillhuddleston9445 4 роки тому +10

      @@John1911 In other words they illegally delegated their law making power to a government agency run by un-elected bureaucrats.

  • @5jjt
    @5jjt 4 роки тому +1334

    It's too easy to become a felon without even knowing so.

    • @yunggolem4687
      @yunggolem4687 4 роки тому +143

      The people making up all this crap "law" should be in prison.

    • @jonkR96
      @jonkR96 4 роки тому +52

      Justin
      That’s the idea.

    • @Obnoxiouspatriot
      @Obnoxiouspatriot 4 роки тому +4

      “Felon”

    • @jatpack3
      @jatpack3 4 роки тому +56

      Almost everyone has committed a felony at some point. Basically the department of justice is broken along with the law makers.

    • @Mpeterson1286
      @Mpeterson1286 4 роки тому +47

      It's nearly impossible not to commit some kind of felony these days.
      It's just a matter of if you get caught and selective enforcement.

  • @DavidWRankinJr
    @DavidWRankinJr 4 роки тому +49

    One mention about SBR rules: all the rules in the NFA were written because they were also going to ban pistols. The SBR rules were to catch people sawing off their rifles to make new, post-ban pistols....
    Encourage your lawmakers to have the SBR rules removed from the NFA because they only exist to ban something that's not illegal: pistols.

    • @AICW
      @AICW 4 роки тому +7

      Or it just might light a fire under their asses to go on a full frontal assault to ban pistols.

    • @gifthorse3675
      @gifthorse3675 4 роки тому +2

      Within ten years all guns will be illegal, and we will be forced to turn them in at gun point, so just be ready because Americans have given up and will surrender them willingly.

    • @matthewbeaver5026
      @matthewbeaver5026 4 роки тому +4

      @@gifthorse3675 not this guy, MOLON LABE!

    • @zoomzoom3950
      @zoomzoom3950 4 роки тому +1

      NFA is most egregious, yet just one of many 2A infringements. NFA needs to be repealed in its' entirety, not edited. IMO

    • @thomasalsum2012
      @thomasalsum2012 4 роки тому +3

      AICW let’s get it over with then, we can either lite the fire now and maybe put up a fight and loose a painfully slow battle.

  • @Gary-mq1hn
    @Gary-mq1hn 4 роки тому +3

    Finally! An actual explanation on the diff in sbr and pistol. I have searched the internet and no one, no one explains it thru. All I can say is Thank you. Thank you.

  • @richardthomas6602
    @richardthomas6602 2 роки тому +6

    You can also pin and weld a suppressor on the barrel extending the overall barrel length to 16 inches. No tax stamp needed and can add all the good stuff.

    • @jeffsjolin9303
      @jeffsjolin9303 10 місяців тому +2

      Tax stamp still needed for the suppressor...

    • @TheSpecialJ11
      @TheSpecialJ11 2 місяці тому

      ​​@@jeffsjolin9303Yeah. Which is even more outrageous than the SBR tax stamp. "Yeah, before we allow you to add a good way to protect your hearing and those around you to your gun, that'll be $200 and a bunch of annoying paperwork."

  • @KingTesticus
    @KingTesticus 4 роки тому +493

    Defund the ATF. Only Congress is mandated to make laws, not some unelected bureaucracy govt agency.

    • @dannzalbjorklund
      @dannzalbjorklund 4 роки тому +11

      Do something about it. Nobody wants to read your opinion.

    • @txpistolero
      @txpistolero 4 роки тому +4

      “Only Congress is mandated to make laws.” False statement.

    • @dominicrossop3160
      @dominicrossop3160 4 роки тому +1

      Let’s push that and wait till we’re dead to see the results of our work

    • @slavsupreme5129
      @slavsupreme5129 4 роки тому +1

      >Implying Congress isn’t exactly that

    • @jonathanhouser8194
      @jonathanhouser8194 4 роки тому +4

      And even they can't create a law that goes against the constitution ie the 2nd amendment.

  • @tophergauruder3647
    @tophergauruder3647 4 роки тому +349

    The one rule of braced pistols is to never ask the ATF Never Never Never

    • @JaronActual
      @JaronActual 4 роки тому +57

      The one rule of -braced pistols- owning firearms is to never ask the ATF anything!

    • @jonmeray713
      @jonmeray713 4 роки тому +4

      Everyone online has ignored that.

    • @CoryHobbs2178
      @CoryHobbs2178 4 роки тому +24

      Looks like we're going to have to write a letter to the ATF asking them if it's okay to write them a letter.

    • @theoverunderthinker
      @theoverunderthinker 4 роки тому +5

      those senators asking them to tell us "once and for all" needed to have read this comment!
      :)

    • @wood-wheel-wizard
      @wood-wheel-wizard 4 роки тому

      Jus stay away from anything like that

  • @bigro4444
    @bigro4444 4 роки тому +618

    In summary; repeal the NFA.

    • @screamingstrings76
      @screamingstrings76 4 роки тому +8

      Seriously, I want a drum Thompson

    • @zoomzoom3950
      @zoomzoom3950 4 роки тому +5

      and FOPA while we're at it.

    • @jonathanhouser8194
      @jonathanhouser8194 4 роки тому +1

      Exactly!

    • @kristianhill7678
      @kristianhill7678 4 роки тому +12

      And abolish the atf

    • @InGratitudeIam
      @InGratitudeIam 4 роки тому +7

      That almost happened with the suppressor case out of the Midwest. Unfortunately, AG Bill Barr told the SCOTUS not to hear the case because it would have undone the NFA.

  • @tmacfan16
    @tmacfan16 3 роки тому +30

    Great video, learned a lot. Made my purchase of a pistol brace seem a whole lit smarter. Ill take my chances of the ATF banning them over being put in a database as an SBR owner.

    • @cassiespencer6134
      @cassiespencer6134 Рік тому

      Personally I'm not a fan of pistol braces. Why take an easily concealed handgun and add a 'brace' which is essentially a poor stock making it more difficult to conceal. One may as well carry an SBR simply due the fact a rifle round is superior to a pistol cartridge. Personally I carry a G19 since it will allow me to fight my way to the rifle I shouldn't have dropped. ;)

  • @AdamRast
    @AdamRast 4 роки тому +7

    This is extremely helpful. I had a lot of trouble finding clear information on the legal definitions and differences between sbr and pistol while planning to build an ar9mm pcc with a 16" barrel for home defense. Now I'm thinking an 8.5" pistol would be more maneuverable, and easier to sweep the house without feeling like I'm on patrol in Nam or something.

  • @antitankautism8052
    @antitankautism8052 4 роки тому +220

    "By law, federal agencies such as ATF must consult the public when creating, modifying, or deleting rules in the Code of Federal Regulations."
    Straight from their website.
    But they're too busy dosing out large portions of infringement to follow their own rules.

    • @No-mq5lw
      @No-mq5lw 4 роки тому +6

      I'm like 80% sure that line is why this video was made.

    • @antitankautism8052
      @antitankautism8052 4 роки тому +32

      @@No-mq5lw Woah, be careful there, friend. Don't let the ATF hear you say "80%"

    • @PS-rr2jt
      @PS-rr2jt 4 роки тому +5

      Jaren Kelley
      That’s funny!

    • @phillhuddleston9445
      @phillhuddleston9445 4 роки тому +7

      But by the constitution only congress can create laws, they can not delegate their lawmaking powers to federal agencies but they do anyway.

    • @No-mq5lw
      @No-mq5lw 4 роки тому

      @@phillhuddleston9445 Ever hear about Executive orders?

  • @andrewmanley9579
    @andrewmanley9579 4 роки тому +122

    The ATF don't make it easy to understand. Kinda like the IRS or your damn mobile phone co.

    • @shekelwarlocke
      @shekelwarlocke 4 роки тому +4

      Yep, it's all a catch-22. Vague rules in hopes that you fuck up and have to pay them extra money.

    • @WitchyWagonReal
      @WitchyWagonReal 4 роки тому +2

      Yep... by design. if not originally, certainly the current “rules” perpetuate because of that, in a “feature not a bug” sort of way.

    • @wades623
      @wades623 4 роки тому

      its funny that those 2 are integrated huh...

  • @zoomzoom3950
    @zoomzoom3950 4 роки тому +16

    When I got my PDW, I opted for the pistol version without a brace due to the ATF's general ambiguity, subjective inconsistencies and probability of arbitrary changes to their pronouncements over time. Nor did I choose the SBR version because of the hassle.
    I use a single point sling, with a technique where I brace both of my elbows against my torso. When holding the PDW on target and looking down at my forearms they form a near-perfect isosceles triangle. When I look directly ahead, the pdw is centered and I'm looking directly through my red dot sight. When I fire, there is very little movement and I'm quickly back on target for the next shot.
    I spent time practicing and now it's second nature. Works great for me.

    • @zoomzoom3950
      @zoomzoom3950 2 роки тому

      @@mathewnottingham1006 yes! great to hear.
      I've also worked out a left and right side stance based on the technique I described. It presents a smaller target to opponents.
      Without a brace or a stock, the PCC pistol is much smaller, maneuverable and versatile.
      Currently working on walking and running while keeping aim somewhat "on target" which is challenging, not impossible. Much more movement without a brace or stock.
      Cheers!

  • @secpendragon9760
    @secpendragon9760 4 роки тому +351

    "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government bureau

    • @gilly3380
      @gilly3380 4 роки тому

      Copy that

    • @clickclack7451
      @clickclack7451 3 роки тому +7

      No not a convenience store that's a lil bit off the chain their can be crazies buying em

    • @FeralRabbit
      @FeralRabbit 3 роки тому +3

      I'm making the T-Shirt now.

    • @ChefofWar33
      @ChefofWar33 3 роки тому

      @@FeralRabbit Id buy it.

    • @edwardluth7740
      @edwardluth7740 3 роки тому +1

      We don’t need the ATF. We never use to have it. People need to get the constitution out and read it and study past leaders in 1800s to early 1900s.

  • @andrewcocho2467
    @andrewcocho2467 3 роки тому

    Im new to the AR-15 comunity, I got American tactical AR-15 pistol and have been searching so many info on the web and youtube for months. Lucky Gunner just opened my eyes 21 minutes and 30 seconds! Thank you much! A perfect video to explain it so well!

  • @jthrelf
    @jthrelf 4 роки тому +114

    Anyone who understands the NFA knows it does not make any practical sense and serves no other purpose than generating revenue for the ATF.

    • @Phoenix_Atlas
      @Phoenix_Atlas 4 роки тому +9

      @@ReptilianLepton Wow that fact is nauseating.

    • @reedr1659
      @reedr1659 4 роки тому +2

      It was supposed to make certain items completely out of reach to most average people financially. However, the initial $200 never came with an inflation adjustment mechanism (thank God) $200 in 1934 money was a small fortune. Today, thanks to the Federal Reserve, $200 ain't s#it. If we keep going the way we're going, anything costing $200 will be a joke. You'll give them $200 and tell them "Don't spend it all in one place, sucker!"

    • @timmyturner8579
      @timmyturner8579 4 роки тому +1

      And gives them your identity so if they were to become tyranical theu know who to go to first.

    • @ChefofWar33
      @ChefofWar33 3 роки тому

      @@reedr1659 $200 is still alot bud. Thats the price of a whole other gun.

  • @StEvEn420BrUlE
    @StEvEn420BrUlE 4 роки тому +22

    Owning one as a pistol allows me to conceal carry it in a backpack, can't do that with a rifle. Braces have become very comfortable and have the same features as stocks so assuming there isn't a random ATF ban I see no reason to SBR it

  • @major45acp
    @major45acp 4 роки тому +22

    I really appreciate your articulate perspective without all the hyperbole and machismo.

  • @johnsimmons9648
    @johnsimmons9648 3 роки тому +2

    The best explanation I’ve heard to date . I’ve been listening to several people on this subject and they all left me more concerned than relieved. After watching you go through the issues and possible remedies I feel worst case scenario will cost me a few bucks or get practicing with that 2 point sling technique. Thanks again!

  • @Debonairvik
    @Debonairvik 4 роки тому +2

    The best 21 minutes I've spent watching a video on you tube. Thanks for the informative video brother.

  • @richwalter3107
    @richwalter3107 4 роки тому +7

    You did a great job explaining the differences and pointing out the ambiguities between the two. Can't ask for much more than that

  • @ihavenoaffinity
    @ihavenoaffinity 4 роки тому +359

    "A pistol with a brace is not necessarily going to save you a whole lot of money over just paying for a $200 tax stamp"
    Sure, but then at least my money is going into the industry instead of into a bureaucratic void

    • @mr.squishy5024
      @mr.squishy5024 4 роки тому +27

      My objection has always been giving the ATF fingerprints. The 200$ isn't the end of the world.

    • @N20Joe
      @N20Joe 4 роки тому +28

      It doesn't just go into a void, it funds the enemy of your freedom.

    • @killerratchet1973
      @killerratchet1973 4 роки тому +14

      Not to mention it's much faster buying an AR pistol with a brace, than it is to wait for your SBR to be approved. There's also travel restrictions for SBRs going across state lines which don't apply to AR pistols.

    • @N20Joe
      @N20Joe 4 роки тому +8

      @erozpl01 Oh my friend, how much you have yet to learn about government! That just means they get a bigger budget out of your income taxes ON TOP of the stamp.

    • @immikeurnot
      @immikeurnot 4 роки тому +18

      Register, fingerprint, can't loan it out, can't cross state lines without ATF permission, can't transfer without ATF permission...
      To hell with the tax stamp route.

  • @enricomariacastaldo
    @enricomariacastaldo 4 роки тому +40

    I knew that there were particular regulations and differences about standard rifles, SBRs and pistols there in US, but I never explored them enough: this video has clarified to me many things. What can I say, I thought you didn't have such stupid regulations like we do here in Italy (which for sure are worst!!). At least not at federal level, but at State or local level only.

    • @LuckyGunner
      @LuckyGunner  4 роки тому +26

      Overall, our laws are not as restrictive as most places, but the laws we do have don't make any more sense than they do in other countries.

    • @twistinprops604
      @twistinprops604 4 роки тому +6

      Dont get me started on supressors

    • @scottwest9299
      @scottwest9299 4 роки тому +2

      I think there’s something like 13,000 actual gun laws on the books in the US.
      Here’s just a few “common sense” gun laws we have, thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/359363-What-if-there-were-serious-gun-controls%3F

    • @borkwoof696
      @borkwoof696 4 роки тому

      I thought your laws were relatively decent for a European country

    • @enricomariacastaldo
      @enricomariacastaldo 4 роки тому +3

      @@borkwoof696 yes, for sure they are better than in other countries: we can own almost any type of firearm. But there are limitations on the maximum number of certain types, on the number of cartridges, it's practically impossible to get a carry permit for self-defense (typically the permits that are issued are for sporting or hunting purpose). Not too bad considering the fact that having a firearm here is a privilege and not a right, but I'd prefere less restrictions: most of them does not make sense at all!

  • @CopperLontra
    @CopperLontra 3 роки тому +1

    Man, I really appreciate your choice to not bring your politics into the video and discourage grandstanding in the comments. Just well done, thank you.

  • @k.zekeswaringen2122
    @k.zekeswaringen2122 2 роки тому +3

    Very good information on the differences between a SBR & PDW style pistol. It looks like the
    distinction or enforcement can depend on which way the wind is blowing. Thank you for this
    excellent review.

    • @evanacey1414
      @evanacey1414 Рік тому

      The difference is simple... If your barrel's overall length is less than 16" there are 2 options you have (for now, at least) if you wish to remain on the right side of the law., An "AR pistol" uses a stabilizing brace and cannot have a vfg attached to the rail, while an SBR can be configured any way you'd like. The difference is an additional $200 tax and an additional background check and waiting period if you go the SBR route.

  • @NuclearSandwich7
    @NuclearSandwich7 4 роки тому +100

    Summary: if you decide to shoulder your pistol brace, you might be totally fine, or you might have your house stormed and all the women and children inside killed by the ATF.. non specific example of course.

  • @NCSRFSH
    @NCSRFSH 4 роки тому +6

    Best explanation I've seen so far on this subject.

  • @MK-vj3fq
    @MK-vj3fq 3 роки тому

    Best explanation. Very prescient, and the only video I've seen that correctly laid out the existing uncertainty (at the time), instead of ignoring the ambiguity in favor of assumptions that now have proved incorrect. This video exemplifies why this channel is my most trusted. Please keep them coming.

  • @jackroman8821
    @jackroman8821 4 роки тому +7

    I have to admit... your content is really, really good. Well thought out. Keep up the great work.

  • @loriwieder8115
    @loriwieder8115 4 роки тому +7

    Excellent video. Thank you for making this and giving a clear and concise explanation to a somewhat ambiguous topic.

  • @stewall101
    @stewall101 4 роки тому +57

    So, ATF, what is the difference in being shot by someone with a 9mm 'pistol, (pistol as per this video) or a 9mm sbr?
    Great video.

    • @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz
      @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz 4 роки тому +20

      One costs $200

    • @OutsideTheTargetDemographic
      @OutsideTheTargetDemographic 4 роки тому +14

      @@ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz *One made the government $200 more.

    • @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz
      @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz 4 роки тому

      @@OutsideTheTargetDemographic both are true :)

    • @me2ontube
      @me2ontube 4 роки тому +2

      One will kill you n the other makes you dead ... n like the other guy said ... 200 bucks

    • @gifthorse3675
      @gifthorse3675 4 роки тому

      The cops steal both from you but the SBR will more likely land you in prison for a long time

  • @32icon
    @32icon 4 роки тому +5

    Been following this channel for years and it's always great content. I may now reconsider shouldering in my videos until there's some consistency with the ATF. Thanks for the info.

  • @condohatesme
    @condohatesme 4 роки тому +68

    Who else is here, October 9, 2020, after the ATF reclassified the Honey Badger as an SBR?

    • @John3_17-21
      @John3_17-21 4 роки тому +8

      I heard there's a small clause in the ATF guidelines that states "you can't put pistol braces on your firearm if your company starts and ends with the letter Q"

    • @vidard9863
      @vidard9863 4 роки тому +3

      Was hoping that this had information on that topic.

    • @mojoman2001
      @mojoman2001 3 роки тому

      @@vidard9863 -- yeah, update?

    • @vidard9863
      @vidard9863 3 роки тому

      @@mojoman2001 my understanding is that the ATF backed down, but didn't give any clear resolution. My suspicion is that they are waiting for a more favorable administration, and might be willing to wait for things to calm down a bit. On the other hand dementia Joe might want to come out swinging and assume that no one will care if he goes after braces.

    • @wendellsawyer4386
      @wendellsawyer4386 3 роки тому +5

      @@vidard9863 like the Trump administration was any less favorable? "tHe eIgHT yEaR aSSaULt oN tHe sEcOND aMeNDmENt iS ovEr"

  • @JayWeeldreyer
    @JayWeeldreyer 3 роки тому

    Big THANK YOU for recommending Demonstrated Concepts LLC channel. Hyper original, and max value content over there. LOVE IT

  • @clayfink5938
    @clayfink5938 4 роки тому +67

    Could you do a video about the usage of a m32 rotary grenade launcher for home defense

    • @OutsideTheTargetDemographic
      @OutsideTheTargetDemographic 4 роки тому +3

      Asking for a friend.

    • @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz
      @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz 4 роки тому

      Load with buckshot shells.

    • @kerbalairforce8802
      @kerbalairforce8802 4 роки тому +4

      You can get a 37mm flare launcher and legally shoot magnesium signal flares, smoke shells, and teargas rounds without the hassle of a destructive device registration.

    • @clayfink5938
      @clayfink5938 4 роки тому

      @@kerbalairforce8802 what about a can launcher attached to your ar 15?

    • @DrSkrungle
      @DrSkrungle 4 роки тому +1

      @@clayfink5938 go watch ordnance lab's videos on the can cannon. He shoots live grenades out of his

  • @jeffshootsstuff
    @jeffshootsstuff 4 роки тому +56

    "Crime Against Decency" LOLOL

    • @stewall101
      @stewall101 4 роки тому +1

      So are some "taboo" swear words, apparently.
      I think some people are a 'crime against decency'.

    • @lonememe
      @lonememe 4 роки тому

      @@stewall101 I don't think you saw the fake ATF print out @4:15

  • @glenndavis9886
    @glenndavis9886 4 роки тому +3

    I love your explanations. The detail you provide is so helpful. Your channel is a great resource for the shooting community.

  • @markt.3454
    @markt.3454 4 роки тому +1

    One of the more logic and data driven treatises on the topic. Nicely done.

  • @steveb8883
    @steveb8883 4 роки тому +1

    Great information. Thanks for posting this one. I built my pistol in 300 AAC, 10.5. Love it. I still can't talk myself into building one in 9mm or .45 yet. The cost of an AR style pistol in 9mm or .45 over an M&P with a 17 round capacity hasn't made me go that route yet.

  • @50StichesSteel
    @50StichesSteel 4 роки тому +83

    Just get a brace, and call it a day...No need to over analyze...Just don't be a dummy with it and do or say stupid things in front of cops or in your vehicle.."No officer, this is meant to be a stabilizer for my pistol"..End of story..Use it how you wish in the meantime and don't give them reasons to over think their ruling.

    • @Digressor666
      @Digressor666 4 роки тому +7

      I would say that 99/100 cops would never even so much as question a brace on a pistol, they really just don’t care.

    • @50StichesSteel
      @50StichesSteel 4 роки тому +4

      @@Digressor666 Very true...But you never know when you run into that 1 asshole...Just have that answer ready for that one that's all

    • @LuckyGunner
      @LuckyGunner  4 роки тому +31

      Just keep in mind that getting involved in a defensive shooting with a braced "pistol" could bring some unwanted scrutiny.

    • @SirBilliam96
      @SirBilliam96 4 роки тому +23

      @@LuckyGunner That's what really irritates me about these matters. There never seems to be any legal trouble until someone uses their weapon to put a stop to someone intedning to harm them or their loved ones. Suddenly, that person who made a split second decision to do something no one wants to do is now being considered a criminal by those who wish to change the law. It's infuriating as a gun owner/gun rights supporter

    • @smoraptor
      @smoraptor 4 роки тому +1

      @@LuckyGunner honestly, I wouldnt really use or reccomend using them as HD weapons anyway. One, because of the legal grey area, and two because I dont see a braced pistol to be nearly as effective as a carbine or 18in shotgun.

  • @younusalkhalidey7776
    @younusalkhalidey7776 4 роки тому +8

    I can understand how the effort you were put in to make this educational video! Thank you so much for this informational episode 🖤💙🖤 👍

  • @TROOPERfarcry
    @TROOPERfarcry 4 роки тому +7

    I have an SBR'ed MPX, and while it's a bit more of a hassle to get it from pistol to SBR, my thinking was that the whole package (it has a silencer also) is so pricey, that I really didn't want to get it really close to greatness, and then skimp out at the end.

  • @Dfgbuiiyyyybb
    @Dfgbuiiyyyybb 2 роки тому +2

    I’m really new to firearms and I wish I had come across your video before I made some of my purchases.
    Your explanations are fantastic.

  • @billyg211
    @billyg211 4 роки тому +3

    This is the most informative video on the subject I've ever seen. Thank you, sir.

  • @derweibhai
    @derweibhai 4 роки тому +5

    Immediately thumbs upped the video before it started! You know if Chris does something its gonna be good.

  • @dvonehrlich
    @dvonehrlich 4 роки тому +16

    Thanks for putting the history in to this as well as an overview of the whole messy alphabet soup of ATF vs braces and sbrs. I subscribe to a lot of gun channels and this is probably the best overview yet.

  • @Art-st1qv
    @Art-st1qv 4 роки тому +4

    When I seen this video pop up on my feed I was like yesssss ... I love your content.... just wish we could get more of it but I understand.... it’s a lot of hard work ....thanks for what you do...

  • @Micscience
    @Micscience 3 роки тому +1

    For a new person who wants to get into the firearms world this is a very complicated process. Not only do you have to learn guns with all their gadgets, attachments a infinite number of configurations it becomes a whole lot more complicated when certain parts of a gun are either to big or to small, fixed or not fixed, taxed or dis assembled, right type of ammo or to much ammo. Guns have got to be the most regulated arena in this country. Thanks for making it easier Lucky.

  • @klinec38
    @klinec38 4 роки тому +8

    Members of Congress asked an agency in the Executive Branch for clarification of a law? There's so many things wrong with this.

  • @mpeugeot
    @mpeugeot 4 роки тому +327

    It's been rumored that the ATF doesn't like Freedom, the Constitution, and Firearms... LOL

    • @ejwall
      @ejwall 4 роки тому +10

      If you think theyre bad then dont look at California.

    • @turdfurg47
      @turdfurg47 4 роки тому +15

      They clearly dont like alcohol tobacco or firearms in the hands of civilians

    • @blackwateroutdoors7364
      @blackwateroutdoors7364 4 роки тому +2

      All about the revenue

    • @ER-me1ii
      @ER-me1ii 4 роки тому +4

      Spoke to a gun store owner in Florida. He said the ATF guys were good guys. Look to their commie overlords. They’re the culprits.

    • @JS-qi1ou
      @JS-qi1ou 4 роки тому +11

      @@ER-me1ii just following orders doesn't cut it, I think the Nuremberg trials made that clear quite some time ago.

  • @withoutfurtheradoforever
    @withoutfurtheradoforever 4 роки тому +14

    So, what you are inferring is, we need to get rid of the NFA?

  • @YaketyYakDontTalkBack
    @YaketyYakDontTalkBack 4 роки тому +22

    Lol. They're gonna "interpret" the outlaw of slings next.

  • @69dlx84
    @69dlx84 2 роки тому +1

    You nailed it about all those so called 'youtube gunners' shouldering their braces and firing away with their "pistols". Oh, but man, they're cool though. These guys actively demonstrating this are perfect examples of the ATF's definition of "Manifest Intent". The ATF isn't blind or dumb. We are in this case.

  • @steverileypictures5724
    @steverileypictures5724 3 роки тому

    The technique without the stock is as a photographer who shoots action somethin I have done with an adjustable strap for 40 years.Very nice and informative vid.

  • @laskalives
    @laskalives 4 роки тому +112

    wait, i thought it was illegal to tax a right...

    • @kevinalexander8201
      @kevinalexander8201 4 роки тому +8

      they tax your right to earn a living. they tax you when you buy food. They tax your home. They tax your phone service, your internet, etc.
      is there a right that they DON'T tax?

    • @TheHamgamer
      @TheHamgamer 4 роки тому +5

      @@kevinalexander8201 Breathing. But they may get there.

    • @richardeckrotejr.9721
      @richardeckrotejr.9721 4 роки тому +7

      @@TheHamgamer I think I've heard of a rain water tax in some places also?

    • @garrett8794
      @garrett8794 4 роки тому +3

      @@kevinalexander8201 While all taxation is theft, I must have missed those rights when they were codified in the Bill of Rights and subsequent amendments

    • @kevinalexander8201
      @kevinalexander8201 4 роки тому

      @@garrett8794 ok..... since you want to be like that....Phone, internet is 1st amendment (freedom of speech).
      you're welcome.

  • @phillhuddleston9445
    @phillhuddleston9445 4 роки тому +29

    If I use a belt loop to bump fire a rifle does that make my belt loop illegal :-?

  • @MrHav1k
    @MrHav1k 4 роки тому +8

    "This could all change a couple months from now."
    BOY DO I HAVE A STORY FOR YOU CHRIS!!

  • @BruceMusto
    @BruceMusto 4 роки тому +1

    As always, an informative video that I find particularly relevant as I just purchased an AR pistol. I have seen other content providers who I respect also kind of come to a different conclusion about shouldering a pistol brace. I appreciate both points of view. Keep up the great work on the videos Thanks.

  • @My3nMy4
    @My3nMy4 2 роки тому

    Everyone take a moment and pause the video n the PDW drawing at the beginning. That was beautiful.

  • @burnt-reynolds
    @burnt-reynolds 4 роки тому +12

    You know, as much as dislike useless taxes like the NFA, at the end of the day, it's not even about the money, it's about the goddamn time they take to approve.

  • @FatShadow56
    @FatShadow56 4 роки тому +33

    I bought an “Other”, with my stimulus check. [Laughs in non-NFA]

    • @Please_Consume_Irresponsibly
      @Please_Consume_Irresponsibly 4 роки тому +5

      Nice! My trump check got me an M4 and an Ar Pistol. But if someone sees me shoulder a pistol with a brace, its already too late for them to try and take it away lol.

    • @FyrFytr998
      @FyrFytr998 4 роки тому +4

      I’m behind enemy lines with an “other” as well.

    • @johnsylvester3374
      @johnsylvester3374 4 роки тому

      Hahaha I love the other. Where there is a will there is a way

  • @InexorWoW
    @InexorWoW 4 роки тому +80

    Just reminds me of all the idiots filming themselves chopping rifles down and saying 'one less' as a political statement not realizing they were committing a felony.

    • @mathewmcdonald3657
      @mathewmcdonald3657 3 роки тому +3

      Shall not be infringed

    • @mathewmcdonald3657
      @mathewmcdonald3657 3 роки тому +3

      It’s not a felony. It’s an illegal law. If you want to know it all know the truth.

  • @SJ-dn8dn
    @SJ-dn8dn 4 роки тому

    I cannot thank you enough because this definitely enlightened me and shame on me for not looking into this further.....I just bought a CZ Bren 2 in 7.62 x 39 cal with 11.5" barrel. The gun shop (which I trusted and have always been extremely knowledgable) was like "yeah we can add a brace for you, no problem" but left out the part about the risk of shouldering a pistol with the brace. The lack of transparency is bullshit from ATF and should not be considered a "law" if they don't give clear distinction on the parameters that could ruin your life. What is really bothering me is that I typically research as much as possible before a purchase but because of the lack of availability on ammo, I made an impulse buy on this gun because it was one of the last 7.62 x 39 calibers on the wall. Lesson learned....almost the hard way.

  • @SandViperJ3000
    @SandViperJ3000 Рік тому

    Thanks, great content, you added a lot of clarity to sbr’s and pew’s and the mumbo jumbo laws that surround the topic

  • @TheHighGround16
    @TheHighGround16 4 роки тому +17

    The words "shall not be infringed" come to my mind for some reason.

  • @24roughing76
    @24roughing76 4 роки тому +7

    Now let's talk about the Mossberg Shockwave not being a "shotgun"😂😃😂🤣

  • @grafstaufenberg3030
    @grafstaufenberg3030 4 роки тому +11

    Fun fact for all Americans who are afraid of some paperwork and 200$ to get a braced pistol:
    Here in Germany you have to join a shooting club for at least one year, get professional training at least every month, get a level 2 gunsafe, get a psychological healthchack and write a exam about firearm technology and safety just to get a WBK (gun owning card) witch allow you to own a gun for sports purpose and transport it to the shooting range, even a single shot .22 require this process witch will probably cost you 3000$.
    Oh, and even in case of a terroristic attack, you are not allowed to use it for self-defense because the German government has the privilege on lethal force witch was by the way given to them buy the Americans after ww2.

    • @champy1210
      @champy1210 4 роки тому

      Ja, wir wissen wie drakonisch eure Waffengesetze sind. Sie sollten denjenigen hierzulande, die sich lieber allmähliche Aushöhlungen ihrer Rechte („Tod durch tausend Schnitte″) gefallen lassen, statt lautstark darum zu kämpfen, als Warnung dienen. Nicht vergessen: unser zweiter Verfassungszusatz gewährt uns Amerikanern keine Rechte; er kodifiziert sie einfach, denn jeder Mensch bekommt sie von unserem Schöpfer. Die Deutschen besitzen auch diese Rechte . Sie werden einfach nicht anerkannt. Viele Grüße aus den USA!

    • @nebulousJames12345
      @nebulousJames12345 4 роки тому +3

      The problem is that america is free, while germany is not.

    • @grafstaufenberg3030
      @grafstaufenberg3030 4 роки тому

      @@champy1210
      Das Problem ist jedoch das Rechte, welche nicht direkt erlebbar sind, steht's von verschiedensten Personen und Organisationen abgestritten werden. Die Gravitation wird niemand leugnen, da jeder einen Apfel beim fallen zu sehen kann, bei menschlichen Freiheitsrechten ist das schon anders. Da der Mensch der schönen neuen Welt jedoch Beweise fordert, ohne weder etwas von Geschichte noch Philosophie zu verstehen, kann er nicht erkennen was wir schon lange wissen.
      PS wie kommt es dass sie mir mit perfektem Deutsch antworten?

    • @NamesZKP
      @NamesZKP 4 роки тому

      I can't tell if this is hyperbole or not.

    • @UgandanAirForce
      @UgandanAirForce 4 роки тому +4

      reminds me of when that Paris terror attack happened where several armed terrorists shot and killed around 130 some people. I bet you if France was as armed as the U.S. a decent amount of those people people could've had some kind of chance of survival with their conceal carry weapons.

  • @davidshechtman4746
    @davidshechtman4746 4 роки тому

    I have an old Olympic Arms OA93. A dedicated ar pistol. I have always used a single point sling with great success

  • @TCRONIN002
    @TCRONIN002 3 роки тому +2

    Love the apolitical stance and the no nonsense approach to sharing challenging information that will undoubtedly stir the imagination of both gun owners and non-gun owners alike. Great video worth every minute of watching!

  • @thelonghornguy
    @thelonghornguy 4 роки тому +7

    I'm an avid gun hobbiest, and attorney, the ATF recently ruled, by letter, on what they consider a "vertical foregrip" to be. They specifically say that the angle for a vertical foregrip is 90 degrees ONLY, and they go on to say that angled foregrips are ALLOWED and will NOT change the designation from pistol to rifle.

    • @Timewaits4no1
      @Timewaits4no1 4 роки тому +1

      @thelonghornguy Thanks for letting us know. I'm currently shopping for a AR pistol brace, and a foregrip so that helps me out. I hate the fact that trying to follow the laws regarding firearms can be so confusing to regular citizens like myself that want to do the right thing

    • @chrisw2907
      @chrisw2907 4 роки тому +1

      Thx

    • @qx4n9e1xp
      @qx4n9e1xp 4 роки тому

      Question, should I pull the trigger on a PCC w/ brace soon, or can I wait to save a little more and get it next year?
      I'm waiting with the expectation it will still be available next year.

    • @hudsongiesbrecht2418
      @hudsongiesbrecht2418 2 роки тому +1

      89 degree foregrips, here we come

  • @OutsideTheTargetDemographic
    @OutsideTheTargetDemographic 4 роки тому +11

    What if you grab the rear of your buffer tube like a fist, your thumb hanging over the end. Press pistol into chest, thumb in between tube and chest? We can call it "fisting the government"?

  • @dontdoxmebro
    @dontdoxmebro 4 роки тому +6

    I've never seen a pistol brace used for it's intended purpose; it's a cop-out loop hole. Also why would you ask the ATF anything they're not a law firm.

  • @JDda3rd
    @JDda3rd 4 роки тому

    Gave me a bit more perspective. I have spoken with coworkers in the military, that are also shooters, to gauge buying a SBR vs AR pistol. Thanks for the video.

  • @nightnday6675
    @nightnday6675 3 роки тому

    People should support Lucky Gunner more by buying their merchandise therefore they can produce more videos like these.

  • @carltonjordan3689
    @carltonjordan3689 3 роки тому +3

    I would never have imagined that a piece of velcro could be used as a stay out of jail card. 😳

  • @maureenjacobs3697
    @maureenjacobs3697 4 роки тому +4

    I was treated very well by the folks at the ATF despite my paperwork “errors”. Kudos to the person who maintained the huge amount of patience during my enquiries.

  • @appendixcarrybear9141
    @appendixcarrybear9141 4 роки тому +66

    Hello company that nobody elected would you please tell me if I can have my rights or not thank you
    -An American Citizen

    • @keithgraham9547
      @keithgraham9547 4 роки тому +4

      That would be NO!
      Signed,
      Incredibly bloated overreaching government bureaucrats

  • @TheQwikset
    @TheQwikset 4 роки тому

    I have a maxim brace on my ar pistol. It doesn't deploy far enough for me to shoulder it properly anyways so I've been using the check method without a sling for over 4 years. The maxim has a wide enough pad that my check stabilizes it almost as well as my ar rifle on my shoulder. I've had zero problems and with my red dot it almost always is spot on..

  • @ckultra121
    @ckultra121 3 роки тому

    Great brake down, and very full of information to validate existing knowledge of the details. Nice tip on sling strategy.

  • @b.griffin317
    @b.griffin317 4 роки тому +4

    11:00 "hopefully we'll hear a ruling in the near future and hopefully it will be favorable to gun owners" ya, tickling the dragon always works out well. 🤣

  • @runlevelone
    @runlevelone 4 роки тому +39

    My political manifesto: free beer, brats, guns, and unicorns for everyone!

    • @gifthorse3675
      @gifthorse3675 4 роки тому +3

      Can I have a minigun mounted on my unicorn?

    • @screamingstrings76
      @screamingstrings76 4 роки тому

      @@gifthorse3675 as long as both are FREE

    • @gabeeg
      @gabeeg 4 роки тому

      We of the free beer, brats and guns anti-unicorn league take offense at your manifesto!

    • @Boarderforlife15
      @Boarderforlife15 4 роки тому +1

      Everyone gets a pony and free dental.

    • @thomasalsum2012
      @thomasalsum2012 4 роки тому

      Alright so did I hear we are starting our own autonomous zone?

  • @PubieSaladx
    @PubieSaladx 4 роки тому +4

    Came here looking to educate myself, left paranoid and unsure if I should buy either 😂

    • @majorpwner241
      @majorpwner241 3 роки тому

      Let me put it to you this way: I've been threatened with 10 years for getting hit by a cop. You read that right - they hit me, and said I spit on them, and that got me hit with assault on a public servant. So, with that kind of experience behind me, being threatened with 10 years for standing up for my rights doesn't seem so scary anymore.

  • @Stiv1962
    @Stiv1962 4 роки тому

    I really appriciate the clarification, excellently delivered too!

  • @jackpenman3834
    @jackpenman3834 4 роки тому

    Got my eFile form 1 back in 2.5 weeks. Crazy fast right now and recommend going this route.

  • @BoogalooBoy
    @BoogalooBoy 4 роки тому +64

    Pistol braces are eventually gunna replace SBRs, just sayin'.

    • @julianmatheney977
      @julianmatheney977 4 роки тому +12

      Just for ease of use they practically have!

    • @BoogalooBoy
      @BoogalooBoy 4 роки тому +6

      @@julianmatheney977 If the government bans em', they're probably gunna start a second civil war.

    • @julianmatheney977
      @julianmatheney977 4 роки тому +6

      They have lost money cause of this advancement in tech lol.

    • @BoogalooBoy
      @BoogalooBoy 4 роки тому +8

      @@julianmatheney977 ATF and federal government: "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"

    • @bigsean2473
      @bigsean2473 4 роки тому +10

      there really is no difference in the brace vs stock. it works just as good as a stock. the atf are just idiots with the laws they make. i thought the point of not being able to have a short barrel rifle was because they didnt want a crime to be committed and the police be out gunned. but turn around and say if it has no stock or a brace it ok. really?? still the same high powered weapon and the police are out gunned until they realize the person has a rifle and the get theirs. most of their rules are dumb when you really break them down. they just want money

  • @almosthuman4457
    @almosthuman4457 4 роки тому +138

    i have to say it, the NFA is a violation of the second amendment.

    • @WalrusWinking
      @WalrusWinking 3 роки тому +1

      Any regulation is.

    • @Lardum
      @Lardum 3 роки тому +1

      @@WalrusWinking the second amendment is vague as fuck and should be rewritten to be much clearer.

    • @andrewenriquez3138
      @andrewenriquez3138 3 роки тому

      @@Lardum how is it vague when it says what the amendment is for?

    • @ChefofWar33
      @ChefofWar33 3 роки тому

      @@Lardum Shall not be infringed is pretty damn specific.

    • @edwardluth7740
      @edwardluth7740 3 роки тому

      Damn right and I will never shut up. I say rebel! Or we are going to lose all our freedoms. Covid was concocted as was the last election and the NWO is real. So shoot me if you don’t like wth I’m saying. I will never shut up.

  • @purdysanchez
    @purdysanchez 4 роки тому +7

    So you're allowed to own it as long as you artificially handicap your ability to use it effectively? That's the most arbitrary law ever.

  • @sirbondman007
    @sirbondman007 4 роки тому +1

    OUTSTANDING PRESENTATION! Your information has greatly helped me to learn how the ATF thinks or does not think. The ambiguity from them needs to be eliminated. Personally, I think that their "rules" suck regarding SBRs and full auto handguns & rifles.

  • @IvanRossS
    @IvanRossS 4 роки тому

    What a Perfect Video on building 300 Blackout pistol with a brace

  • @kevinfarner6052
    @kevinfarner6052 4 роки тому +24

    End the ATF, Jo Jorgensen 2020
    👌🏼

    • @6Midnite6Raven6
      @6Midnite6Raven6 3 роки тому +1

      People are still being dumbed down into the two systems, my friend. You and I know that, everything could've been so much better if people actually WAKE TF UP, and realize that blue and red, they don't give a F about us.

  • @BertieW0oster
    @BertieW0oster 4 роки тому +15

    "shall not be infringed" .... well, so much for that.

  • @b-dog3862
    @b-dog3862 4 роки тому +3

    I didn't "intend" to shoulder it, it just happened.

  • @rcdubya
    @rcdubya 3 роки тому

    Thanks for an excellent overview. I am just beginning the thought process about purchasing an AR9 PDW, and your video gave me a lot to consider.

  • @rickamc3521
    @rickamc3521 2 роки тому

    Best explanation on this topic on UA-cam

  • @freedomlineman3105
    @freedomlineman3105 4 роки тому +20

    Registering anything with the ATF will only make confiscation that much easier in the future. It is happening Canada right now.

    • @jackpenman3834
      @jackpenman3834 4 роки тому +1

      they're not ready for that shit show. lol

    • @salty_terminal_civilian5374
      @salty_terminal_civilian5374 3 роки тому

      I hate people who use this argument. Unless you only buy privately in a state that allows it, you always fill out an ATF form and background check. They already know where TF you are anyway, and a majority of the time people will make bills of sale anyway.

    • @ChefofWar33
      @ChefofWar33 3 роки тому

      @@salty_terminal_civilian5374 Not me. I lost all my guns in a boating accident. :)

    • @Peaceful_Gojira
      @Peaceful_Gojira 2 роки тому

      this didn't age well