@@Josh.Davidson So what was its purpose? To keep people from changing their serial numbers and getting unbanned or was it about people downgrading because from what I hear older dashboards don’t work with type 2 KVs
I have one of these refurbed xenon’s as well from 2008, however I’m not sure if the CPU also has a high tg underfill or not. My console is identical to this one internally as far as part numbers on the chips go, but mine has a 78FK Hitachi drive. If the CPU was also fixed, I might just use it as a retail.
@@50ne50 Just because one can find examples doesn't mean it is an issue. Think if you look well enough you can find examples for failures of all components present really. It boils down to: Pretty much all GPUs before the underfill was fixed would fail. Yet, CPU failures were very rare as they did not have the same problem.
@ plenty have failed over the years. I’ve been working on 360’s since 2006 and have seen plenty of xenon, zephyr, and early falcon boards have CPU failures. I just don’t know whether or not they were addressed with a higher TG underfill later on like the GPU was.
Awesome find Eric. Loved this video. The CB LDV of 5 shows that Type 2 KV is enforced.
So what’s with the Type 2 KVs anyway? Was it Microsoft’s way keeping people from downgrading to 4532 and doing the KK exploit?
Type 2 KV is hashed and thus can't be edited.
Hash of the Cpu key is contained within :)
@@Josh.Davidson So what was its purpose? To keep people from changing their serial numbers and getting unbanned or was it about people downgrading because from what I hear older dashboards don’t work with type 2 KVs
Genuinely impressed with your knowledge. Great find man!
Very cool find! I wonder if this is a test run or something like that to see feasibility for the approach they had with Elpis boards.
Very cool, thanks for sharing!
That's pure awesome sauce!
Great find! 🎉
So what’s up with it showing up as a 64MB console under the Keyvault tab in Jrunner?
@@EmeraldWC it was after a xell img was written, likely a jrunner bug
Yeah it would be strange to have a 64MB nand on a retail system
I have one of these refurbed xenon’s as well from 2008, however I’m not sure if the CPU also has a high tg underfill or not. My console is identical to this one internally as far as part numbers on the chips go, but mine has a 78FK Hitachi drive. If the CPU was also fixed, I might just use it as a retail.
CPU was never an issue, only the GPU.
@@jordonleedell not true. I have a few xenon’s with dead CPUs it’s just less likely than the GPU.
@@50ne50 Just because one can find examples doesn't mean it is an issue. Think if you look well enough you can find examples for failures of all components present really.
It boils down to: Pretty much all GPUs before the underfill was fixed would fail. Yet, CPU failures were very rare as they did not have the same problem.
@@50ne50 I never ever had a CPU fail. I touched about 20 consoles. Always GPU.
@ plenty have failed over the years. I’ve been working on 360’s since 2006 and have seen plenty of xenon, zephyr, and early falcon boards have CPU failures. I just don’t know whether or not they were addressed with a higher TG underfill later on like the GPU was.