I believe there is an oversight on the creation of this Table: ATCGTGGTACTG - Index A TGGCCCTGTATC - Index F Both have length a of 12 they both have only 1 common letter between them (the second letter from the right) so 12-1=11 not the 10 printed in the Table itself.
Isn't this technically the WPGMA method and not UPGMA? UPGMA takes into account the number of clusters when combining the rows whereas this just takes the average of two.
The best tutorial on Phylogenetics tree construction for me.
Thanks
I watched several videos and was still confused, but after watching this one, I understood everything not even half way through the video. Thank you!
A&F 11
B&F 11
C&F 11
D&F 10
E&F 10
regardless those few mistakes, final graph is correct!
Thanks for the valuable video,it's really help me at last night before the exam and really easy to understand.
Thanks for teaching, very clear
awesome, Thanks for the great explanation!
I believe there is an oversight on the creation of this Table:
ATCGTGGTACTG - Index A
TGGCCCTGTATC - Index F
Both have length a of 12
they both have only 1 common letter between them (the second letter from the right)
so 12-1=11 not the 10 printed in the Table itself.
Same with B x F and C x F
Very good explanation
Thank you so much!
Thank you very much
it helped me a lot😀
Really helpful
Amazing!
Using ML and MP .....Plz up.......and nyc one to understand PT
Isn't this technically the WPGMA method and not UPGMA? UPGMA takes into account the number of clusters when combining the rows whereas this just takes the average of two.
Thank u soooo much!!!! :D
Would you please explain the neighbour joining,maximum-parsimony, maximum-likelihood & other tree building methods.
Thank you.
I believe for (A*F) , (B*F) and (C*F) it is supposed to be 11.
wow beuatiful thanks
সেরা
ساعة السووودة