Nokian WR G4 tire review... 1 year of use!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @johngifford8027
    @johngifford8027 Рік тому +6

    I have WRG4 ‘s on a 2016 Fusion. I live in the Lake Ontario Snow Belt and these tyres are awesome. 28k on them and no sign of excessive wear. The biggest benefit is braking traction capability. The area where these tyres excellent is with wet and or slushy roads. I wish they came in 245/60/20 so that I could put them on my 4Runner

  • @MrSteveb1
    @MrSteveb1 10 місяців тому +1

    My daughter has them on her Toyota Yaris a small FWD car. Don’t get a lot of snow up here in the NW where we live but they work great when we do. Wet weather traction and braking is also very good . She doesn’t drive a lot so can’t say a lot about wear but she’s had them about 2 years and still look new . I may decide to go with them on my Outback

  • @haraldappelboom7852
    @haraldappelboom7852 10 місяців тому

    Great review, I liked them on my Grand Cherokee summit. 5.7 ltr. Good road holding and hydroplane resistant. They lasted around 22,000 miles before needing replacement. Rotated every 5000 miles. ( normal on a permanent AWD vehicle)

  • @mlorcap
    @mlorcap 10 місяців тому +1

    The Nokian G4 is a good tire for places where you do not have enough snow to justify a dedicated winter tire (it deliver balanced performance across the seasons). I could even went thru difficult mountain routes (rough terrain, lots of rocks), and thanks to its Aramid sidewalls I have never had an issue. It lasted around 34K miles though (the G3 lasted around 38K). If the G5 has a better treadwear, it will become my favorite tire.

    • @redbeard_reviews1
      @redbeard_reviews1  9 місяців тому

      A couple winters now and they definitely handle well on the packed snow and some ice. I’m glad I don’t have to switch out in the summer!

  • @NJturtlePower
    @NJturtlePower 2 місяці тому

    Just picked up a set of these for "winter" use Nov. through Feb. here in NJ on my Tesla Model X. Got the WRG4 SUV variant due to the need for XL rated 108/110 load required on the staggered 20" setup. CrossClimate 2's were a runner up, had them before on my Performance Model 3 and they were great, long tread life but more expensive so just trying something new with the Nokians.

  • @flyordieinafire
    @flyordieinafire Рік тому +4

    4:00 talks about mileage and tread.

  • @alphanation368
    @alphanation368 Місяць тому

    weird I am on my 8th year on my hakkapelitas and we have long winters here in alberta.

  • @ssummersquared
    @ssummersquared 10 місяців тому +1

    What is the difference between the G4 SUV vs. G4? I have a 2023 Mazda CX 5, P225/65R17. I live out in Colorado and am prioritizing an all-weather tire that performs well in snow conditions. Should I be looking at getting the G4 SUV?

    • @redbeard_reviews1
      @redbeard_reviews1  10 місяців тому

      I would check on Nokian's website to know for sure. That or talk to your local tire dealer. They should steer you in the right direction! I think it should be the G4 SUV for the CX 5, since it falls in an SUV/CUV type vehicle, but it's always good to check.

    • @waay82
      @waay82 9 місяців тому

      I think the main difference is that the SUV Edition has aramid fiber in the side wall. If you go with the WR G5, there is no regular and SUV line. All have Aramid Fiber in the sidewall.

  • @Robert-k7z2h
    @Robert-k7z2h 4 місяці тому +1

    are they quiet when driving in spring or summer ?

  • @daweller
    @daweller Рік тому +3

    3:34 watch out, surprise attack!

  • @JamesTyson-o2e
    @JamesTyson-o2e 2 місяці тому

    Jermey Overpass

  • @JodiWang-m1z
    @JodiWang-m1z 2 місяці тому

    Barton Union

  • @ElizabethVancil-z9q
    @ElizabethVancil-z9q 2 місяці тому

    Kamille Port