Very informative. Thank You for the great information. I am currently learning and want to adjust my home the best I could. A meter like this will help tremendously.
I recently bought this meter. I was very disappointed because I misunderstood what I actually needed. I thought this meter would help me test for dirty electricity. I am working on trying to get rid of my smart meter, then onto other things I need to do. I have had health issues since the smart meter was put on my house. I am working toward having a safe home where I can find relief from all the electrical issues we all deal with during the day.
You are looking for an electromagnetic meter (not RF - frequencies are too high for dirty electricity). Safe Living Technologies will be coming out with and EMF meter in the next year or two. Keep an eye out for that. It will be the same highly tested accurate meter. Lots of current meters will be reasonably good though for a decent price.
I ordered from Greenwave and they were great to deal with. I liked their products. One thing to be aware of with the dirty electricity filters is that if they are in a bedroom, and if a person is sensitive, they can feel whatever is going on with those filters or within the wiring of the house. I could not have them in my bedroom at the time.
Hey cathy, huge fan of your channel, I’m binge watching all you videos haha. I don’t have a electric field meter cs its too expensive, instead i check my body voltage when I’m sleeping? Is that an affective way to know if there are any electric fields around me? And what’s the ideal body voltage? Thanks
Thanks Charlie! I'm glad you're liking the information. Body Voltage can be a good way to test your electric field, though some building biologist's believe there are too many errors with those readings to be very accurate. It will however tell you if your fields are elevated, and what interventions help you to reduce it, so it's better than nothing. Our goal is to get the measurements under 100 mV
@@cathycooke awesome, because i installed solar pannels, and was concerned that they give of dirty electricity, when i sleep my readings is between 35mv to 75mv that’s fine right?
@@garothetruther2571 oh well, that's a different thing. You body voltage reading will not pick up how much DE you have. You want a DE meter for that or a spectrum analyzer. You can get a relatively inexpensive DE meter here: greenwavefilters.com/partners/332/ You definitely want to test that
Thanks for the info. What are the actual safe readings fur a house? They built a tier nearby and I'm concerned is too freaking close. I might get this meter upon your recommendation! Thanks!
A cellular site was installed across the street and I started have heart palpitations. GQ Emf-390 meter reads 125-150 mW/m2 and peaks up to 225 mW/m2 My bedroom reads 50 -90 mW/m2 I called ATT and was informed the site energy level in below spec. Should I be concerned
Thanks for the review on this meter. This same company now makes a mmwave meter that measure up to 40Ghz I believe. Have you thought about purchasing this meter? It's called Safe and Sound Pro mmWave Meter and is currently selling for $795. Just was wondering what you thought of this meter. I'm thinking of buying one, although I may wait until they come out with an antenna that picks up higher mmwave frequencies like 60 or 100 Ghz.
Yeah I'm interested in it, but it will have minimal value as the mm frequencies are on demand only and in a narrow 10 degree beam. It would be nice to have though.
@@cathycooke Couple comments. What defines "On demand" is a big unknown without a mm wave meter to verify that Verizon is operating as it claims(i.e. only transmitting when a 5G device within range is requesting data). Second, I would think clients that are buying 5G phones would find it very valuable to know what they are being exposed to in terms of radiation from the harmful mm wave radiation. Also, i'm curious what you might find at a sporting event when you have thousands of people with 5G devices and a 5G small cell antenna in the arena. I suppose, regarding your business, it may not be all that valuable. I'm more into the research aspect of what's going on and its why i'm interested. I'd like to know exactly what i'm being exposed to when i go for a walk in downtown Boise. Although, I already know its harmful if i get in that mm wave beam that is headed for a 5G device in close proximity to me. I guess we already know that all the other 3G and 4G frequencies that are being emitted continuously from those 5G small cells are harmful 24/7. I was hoping you had one and could tell me what you thought from your experience.
@@davidmisner3798 Yes you're correct on those points. From others testing we do know that the waves are on demand, but it's yet to be seen how much of an impact they will have when everyone has a new 5G phone
@@cathycooke My dream is that all cell phones are destroyed eventually and all the cell towers and satellites are torn down. All of this technology is nice in theory, but in reality, none of it is compatible with life on this planet.
I recently got this meter and love it, it's pretty good at detecting fast pulses that my Trifield TF2 couldn't detect. I'm considering selling my TF2. Cathy, what would use use as a second meter that pairs well with the Safe & Sound Pro II for picking up any gaps it has or double checking it's results? Thank you!
@@cathycooke I mean a meter that fills the gaps of the safe and sound pro ii. So something good for magnetic fields? Maybe I should keep the trifield for magnetic field purposes? If you were to show up at someone’s house with two meters just to get a lay of the land of all EMF types (excluding dirty electricity since those can use plug in meters) which two meters would you use? Was the scenario I was thinking through. Ideally under $500 price point.
Question: I see that SLT is planning to sell a newer version of this meter that can measure 5G in mmwave. Do you think this will be a useful upgrade? I'm on the bench if it should be something for me to buy over the existing SS Pro II. Thanks....
I would definitely start with the SSPro as that will measure the large majority of what you're exposed to. I don't have an opinion on the 5G meter yet - need to buy it first, test it, and see how valuable it is.
@@cathycooke Thanks for replying, Cathy. I have been borrowing my friend's SS Pro II and it has been an absolute godsend in helping me mitigate RF exposure in my home (neighbour's wifi). I've also been borrowing the Gigahertz ME3830B meter. Very helpful as well. I plan to buy my own meters, hence my curiosity in what to get. Since I'm in no immediate rush, I think I'll wait to see the reviews of the proposed new SS Pro 5 mmwave meter. Thanks again. Your channel is excellent.
@@2flyabove thank you, I'm glad you're finding my channel helpful. I have a used Gigahertz Solutions ME3851A for sale if you're interested. It generally sells for $425 and I'm asking $200 for it (for a client actually). It does need new cords but you can easily get those at SLT.
Hi Cathy-super informative video:) i’m wondering if I can ask you a rookie question-you mention an RF meter measures radio waves in the air such as cell phone, wifi, blue tooth, and smart speakers. I have everything wired. On my laptop, I have an ethernet cable. I never use blue tooth. I have cables connecting my monitor to my laptop. Cables for everything. But I’ve read that even with all my USB, HDMI, and ethernet wires and cables, my MacBook Pro laptop and my Asus monitor and my Wacom tablet and router all still emit a lot of RFs. RFs that "pour" out of the face of my screen and monitor. That is why I want to buy an RF monitor to measure them. I especially want to measure the RFs coming off the screen on my MacBook Pro and my Asus gaming monitor (because my face is always in front of them). I want to measure the RFs from my laptop screen penetrating lead-glass eyeglass lenses vs regular blue light tinted eyeglass lenses. So this is my question: is it true that my devices still emit RFs even though they’re plugged in? Or have I managed to eliminate all EMFs by using cords and cables (and I don’t even know it)? Thanks so much if you read this:)
Great job in getting everything wired! What I suspect is that even though you have cords plugged in, the actual services (WIFI, Bluethooth) are not actually disabled on the devices themselves. A meter will help you identify if that's still happening.
Well, the phone had all RF disabled, so it shouldn't affect the reading in anyway. But RF does bounce all over the place, so it's hard to get a solid, stable reading generally.
@@cathycooke I just got my EMF meter, I too quickly found out what you said, the RF bounces all over the place (smile). Thanks for the video and have a blessed day.
yes that's the max limit for this meter, so it could be even higher. i obviously can't tell you the source b/c it could be many things. you need to start unplugging things inside your house to figure out what it is.
Would you be able to help me and my family🙏🏻 I’m in Virginia and moved into a home with a smart meter. I didn’t even know they existed 😔 until I started having health problems. My ears started ringing and ear pain and a friend of mine asked me of I had a smart meter, which I found out that I did. My symptoms have progressed with nausea, fatigue, headaches, blurry vision and the most newest symptom being weird internal vibrations. I’m so overwhelmed and so worried for me and my family 😔 I’m pretty sure the meter is also causing dirty electricity. Anything you can do to help me I would be more than grateful. The only relief I’m getting is when my husband takes me riding in the country 😔 and I leave this house. We have a two year old little boy who I worry for the most and us not being able to stay in our own home is just alot 😔 Thank you for all you do 🙏🏻
I’ve have been fighting them for months 😔 and they refused to change my meter due to credit history. But they did finally say they would come put on a non communicating meter this Monday, but I’ve heard those are just as bad 😔 I was told twice that I could have my analog back, but they left me on hold Friday and never answered. Do you have any thoughts on the non communicating meter? 🙏🏻Thank you so much for replying 🙏🏻
In market for a budget meter what would you recommend? I was looking at the "safe and sound classic" (pro 2 is a little pricy) and not sure about a good emf meter. Im mainly concerned about the cell tower 400m away, but for emf not sure what will be good enough to find safe zones.
The safe and sound classic is good, it just doesn't tell you the numbers, only if it's high or low. Other meters will test electric fields and magnetic fields as well. All depends on what you want to test. But if it's the cell tower you're after, then the safe and sound classic is a good economical choice: safelivingtechnologies.com/cart.php?action=add&sku=SLT-1390&couponcode=WHBH-5
I think there are still some confusion about 5G. But I can speak only for Germany. Here 5G use the regular frequenzys that are in use by 4G and even 2+3G. There are only two newer frequenzys in use for 5G slightly higher at 3.4 and 3.6Ghz. Some even say its just a 4G 2.0 but that is not true the modulation is very different. So these millimeter waves arent in use yet for 5G but for Elon Musk Starlink satellites. They are using 30Ghz. From my experience the reading of the Safe and Sound were also higher than the one of the Cornet. While the Cornet had quite the same as the Gigahertz I also once had. So it looks like the Safe and Sound do give higher readings or what is your conclusion? For very sensitive persons the Acousticom and Safe and Sound are better because they are more sensitive than Cornet or Gigahertz when it goes bellow 1µW what still can be an issue for electrosensitive persons.
I like the Cornet as well. I think it is quite accurate for the price. It's hard to say if the SSPro is giving higher readings than accurate, because we can only compare to other meters, of which we don't know if they're accurate or not. I fully trust the manufacturers of this meter though. I think its the best personally.
@@cathycooke One possible explanation could be that the SSPro is the newest of all and its better adjusted to get the short pulses of the newer 4G 5G modulation. Maybe thats why it read a bit more?
One of the founders / engineers of SSPro gives a presentation with a slide of the frequency response of that meter around 26min mark ua-cam.com/video/HWFnll8cMCc/v-deo.html I was surprised how not flat it was. Worth examining and noting where the dips and exaggerations are for that meter. They’re fairly proud of the frequency response so I can only imagine other manufacturers are much worse in comparison around the same price range.
The Cornet is good. I recommend it as an entry level meter or for homeowners that can't afford the more expensive meters. IT's not nearly as sensitive as this one, but it does also test Efields and Magnetic fields which is great.
The frequency of these radio waves are fast but not high enough to be able to damage DNA. Also the power of these waves are not so high but I am concerned about resonance.
That’s what we used to think, but plenty of research now shows even low intensity non ionizing radiation is harmful esp when exposed over long time durations. Many similar studies showing dna simply cannot repair itself which ultimately leads to disease or lesser quality of life. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189734/ RF Resonance is interesting though, haven’t gone down that rabbit hole.
@@MichaelMerritt personally I didn't believe too much that kind of research because many parameters are ignored. If you read so many medical research, you will understand everything is bad for the human body even drinking water, medical research isn't always true because they can't analyze all factors.If you read some study about sunlight you will understand even light is harmful. So what we know about low frequency and low power EMF, I think there is some kind of danger but not too much (everything is dangerous!!!) in the long period.
@@alvinfreeman8838 Well sure, all scientific research and discoveries can be dismissed with that line of thinking. Everyone obviously must determine what data and studies they find valid. Because I'm personally negatively effected by EMF's to the point where I'm essentially neurologically disabled until I turn off nearby wifi, I take EMF's pretty seriously. It's also clear other counties such as Germany also agree that safety guidelines should be much lower than they are in the united states so at least I'm not alone.
![5 Ways To Reduce EMF Exposure at Night - Deep Sleep Optimization, Part 2 [2019]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/lLIpxmGbEQg/mqdefault.jpg)
I really appreciate your professional feedback on this product, Thankyou Heaps
Very informative. Thank You for the great information. I am currently learning and want to adjust my home the best I could. A meter like this will help tremendously.
I recently bought this meter. I was very disappointed because I misunderstood what I actually needed. I thought this meter would help me test for dirty electricity. I am working on trying to get rid of my smart meter, then onto other things I need to do. I have had health issues since the smart meter was put on my house. I am working toward having a safe home where I can find relief from all the electrical issues we all deal with during the day.
But that is not the fault of the meter if you buy the wrong meter.
@@Gieszkanne Agreed. I was not faulting the safe and sound meter, just sharing my experience.
You are looking for an electromagnetic meter (not RF - frequencies are too high for dirty electricity). Safe Living Technologies will be coming out with and EMF meter in the next year or two. Keep an eye out for that. It will be the same highly tested accurate meter. Lots of current meters will be reasonably good though for a decent price.
I appreciate your knowledge 🥰👍
Most informative and helpful. Thank you.
I think I need to get a dirty electricity test kit next. Which do you think is better, Satic or Greenwave?
I ordered from Greenwave and they were great to deal with. I liked their products. One thing to be aware of with the dirty electricity filters is that if they are in a bedroom, and if a person is sensitive, they can feel whatever is going on with those filters or within the wiring of the house. I could not have them in my bedroom at the time.
Hey cathy, huge fan of your channel, I’m binge watching all you videos haha. I don’t have a electric field meter cs its too expensive, instead i check my body voltage when I’m sleeping? Is that an affective way to know if there are any electric fields around me? And what’s the ideal body voltage? Thanks
Thanks Charlie! I'm glad you're liking the information. Body Voltage can be a good way to test your electric field, though some building biologist's believe there are too many errors with those readings to be very accurate. It will however tell you if your fields are elevated, and what interventions help you to reduce it, so it's better than nothing. Our goal is to get the measurements under 100 mV
@@cathycooke awesome, because i installed solar pannels, and was concerned that they give of dirty electricity, when i sleep my readings is between 35mv to 75mv that’s fine right?
@@garothetruther2571 oh well, that's a different thing. You body voltage reading will not pick up how much DE you have. You want a DE meter for that or a spectrum analyzer. You can get a relatively inexpensive DE meter here: greenwavefilters.com/partners/332/ You definitely want to test that
Thanks for the info. What are the actual safe readings fur a house? They built a tier nearby and I'm concerned is too freaking close. I might get this meter upon your recommendation! Thanks!
Building Biology guidelines suggest less than 10 uw/m2. Though individual tolerances will vary.
A cellular site was installed across the street and I started have heart palpitations. GQ Emf-390 meter reads 125-150 mW/m2 and peaks up to 225 mW/m2 My bedroom reads 50 -90 mW/m2 I called ATT and was informed the site energy level in below spec. Should I be concerned
That seems extremely high to me. I would not want to be that close to an antenna with numbers that high.
Thanks for the review on this meter. This same company now makes a mmwave meter that measure up to 40Ghz I believe. Have you thought about purchasing this meter? It's called Safe and Sound Pro mmWave Meter and is currently selling for $795. Just was wondering what you thought of this meter. I'm thinking of buying one, although I may wait until they come out with an antenna that picks up higher mmwave frequencies like 60 or 100 Ghz.
Yeah I'm interested in it, but it will have minimal value as the mm frequencies are on demand only and in a narrow 10 degree beam. It would be nice to have though.
@@cathycooke Couple comments. What defines "On demand" is a big unknown without a mm wave meter to verify that Verizon is operating as it claims(i.e. only transmitting when a 5G device within range is requesting data). Second, I would think clients that are buying 5G phones would find it very valuable to know what they are being exposed to in terms of radiation from the harmful mm wave radiation. Also, i'm curious what you might find at a sporting event when you have thousands of people with 5G devices and a 5G small cell antenna in the arena. I suppose, regarding your business, it may not be all that valuable. I'm more into the research aspect of what's going on and its why i'm interested. I'd like to know exactly what i'm being exposed to when i go for a walk in downtown Boise. Although, I already know its harmful if i get in that mm wave beam that is headed for a 5G device in close proximity to me. I guess we already know that all the other 3G and 4G frequencies that are being emitted continuously from those 5G small cells are harmful 24/7. I was hoping you had one and could tell me what you thought from your experience.
@@davidmisner3798 Yes you're correct on those points. From others testing we do know that the waves are on demand, but it's yet to be seen how much of an impact they will have when everyone has a new 5G phone
@@cathycooke My dream is that all cell phones are destroyed eventually and all the cell towers and satellites are torn down. All of this technology is nice in theory, but in reality, none of it is compatible with life on this planet.
@@davidmisner3798 Agreed!
I recently got this meter and love it, it's pretty good at detecting fast pulses that my Trifield TF2 couldn't detect. I'm considering selling my TF2. Cathy, what would use use as a second meter that pairs well with the Safe & Sound Pro II for picking up any gaps it has or double checking it's results? Thank you!
Do you mean another meter for RF, or are you looking for a meter for electric fields, magnetic fields, or dirty electricty?
@@cathycooke I mean a meter that fills the gaps of the safe and sound pro ii. So something good for magnetic fields? Maybe I should keep the trifield for magnetic field purposes?
If you were to show up at someone’s house with two meters just to get a lay of the land of all EMF types (excluding dirty electricity since those can use plug in meters) which two meters would you use? Was the scenario I was thinking through. Ideally under $500 price point.
@@MichaelMerritt Safe Living Technologies is coming out with a few new meters for just this reason. Stay tuned
Question: I see that SLT is planning to sell a newer version of this meter that can measure 5G in mmwave. Do you think this will be a useful upgrade? I'm on the bench if it should be something for me to buy over the existing SS Pro II. Thanks....
I would definitely start with the SSPro as that will measure the large majority of what you're exposed to. I don't have an opinion on the 5G meter yet - need to buy it first, test it, and see how valuable it is.
@@cathycooke Thanks for replying, Cathy. I have been borrowing my friend's SS Pro II and it has been an absolute godsend in helping me mitigate RF exposure in my home (neighbour's wifi). I've also been borrowing the Gigahertz ME3830B meter. Very helpful as well. I plan to buy my own meters, hence my curiosity in what to get. Since I'm in no immediate rush, I think I'll wait to see the reviews of the proposed new SS Pro 5 mmwave meter. Thanks again. Your channel is excellent.
@@2flyabove thank you, I'm glad you're finding my channel helpful. I have a used Gigahertz Solutions ME3851A for sale if you're interested. It generally sells for $425 and I'm asking $200 for it (for a client actually). It does need new cords but you can easily get those at SLT.
Hi Cathy-super informative video:) i’m wondering if I can ask you a rookie question-you mention an RF meter measures radio waves in the air such as cell phone, wifi, blue tooth, and smart speakers. I have everything wired. On my laptop, I have an ethernet cable. I never use blue tooth. I have cables connecting my monitor to my laptop. Cables for everything. But I’ve read that even with all my USB, HDMI, and ethernet wires and cables, my MacBook Pro laptop and my Asus monitor and my Wacom tablet and router all still emit a lot of RFs. RFs that "pour" out of the face of my screen and monitor. That is why I want to buy an RF monitor to measure them. I especially want to measure the RFs coming off the screen on my MacBook Pro and my Asus gaming monitor (because my face is always in front of them). I want to measure the RFs from my laptop screen penetrating lead-glass eyeglass lenses vs regular blue light tinted eyeglass lenses. So this is my question: is it true that my devices still emit RFs even though they’re plugged in? Or have I managed to eliminate all EMFs by using cords and cables (and I don’t even know it)? Thanks so much if you read this:)
Great job in getting everything wired! What I suspect is that even though you have cords plugged in, the actual services (WIFI, Bluethooth) are not actually disabled on the devices themselves. A meter will help you identify if that's still happening.
As you brought the meter closer to your camera, the measurements went up. The camera might be some of the increase readings source
Well, the phone had all RF disabled, so it shouldn't affect the reading in anyway. But RF does bounce all over the place, so it's hard to get a solid, stable reading generally.
@@cathycooke I just got my EMF meter, I too quickly found out what you said, the RF bounces all over the place (smile). Thanks for the video and have a blessed day.
@@cathycooke Was you wifi router broadcasting? What levels do you recommend for a home and outside a home?
Thanks for video. I have this meter. Please may I email you a video of my readings? Or consult with you?
Sure Amanda. You can contact me through my website here: wholehomeandbodyhealth.com/
@@cathycooke thank you so much!
I have this meter and we are getting readings in 3 million range! Whats the source and have you seen levels this high before? Any advice?
yes that's the max limit for this meter, so it could be even higher. i obviously can't tell you the source b/c it could be many things. you need to start unplugging things inside your house to figure out what it is.
I should have mentioned that this is ourside in yard. No internet on within our home. Thanks @cathycooke
@@vfsd234 thats really strange. what does it sound like?
Do your readings drop when you shut off the camera used to make this video?
No, I'm using an old phone which is kept in Airplane mode with the WIFI and Bluetooth disabled at all times.
Would you be able to help me and my family🙏🏻 I’m in Virginia and moved into a home with a smart meter. I didn’t even know they existed 😔 until I started having health problems. My ears started ringing and ear pain and a friend of mine asked me of I had a smart meter, which I found out that I did. My symptoms have progressed with nausea, fatigue, headaches, blurry vision and the most newest symptom being weird internal vibrations. I’m so overwhelmed and so worried for me and my family 😔 I’m pretty sure the meter is also causing dirty electricity. Anything you can do to help me I would be more than grateful. The only relief I’m getting is when my husband takes me riding in the country 😔 and I leave this house. We have a two year old little boy who I worry for the most and us not being able to stay in our own home is just alot 😔 Thank you for all you do 🙏🏻
I suggest you contact your power company and see if you can opt-out to an analog meter. This would be the best option.
I’ve have been fighting them for months 😔 and they refused to change my meter due to credit history. But they did finally say they would come put on a non communicating meter this Monday, but I’ve heard those are just as bad 😔 I was told twice that I could have my analog back, but they left me on hold Friday and never answered. Do you have any thoughts on the non communicating meter? 🙏🏻Thank you so much for replying 🙏🏻
Do you know anything about mae or v2k
are those meters?
In market for a budget meter what would you recommend? I was looking at the "safe and sound classic" (pro 2 is a little pricy) and not sure about a good emf meter.
Im mainly concerned about the cell tower 400m away, but for emf not sure what will be good enough to find safe zones.
The safe and sound classic is good, it just doesn't tell you the numbers, only if it's high or low. Other meters will test electric fields and magnetic fields as well. All depends on what you want to test. But if it's the cell tower you're after, then the safe and sound classic is a good economical choice: safelivingtechnologies.com/cart.php?action=add&sku=SLT-1390&couponcode=WHBH-5
👍👍
I think there are still some confusion about 5G. But I can speak only for Germany. Here 5G use the regular frequenzys that are in use by 4G and even 2+3G. There are only two newer frequenzys in use for 5G slightly higher at 3.4 and 3.6Ghz. Some even say its just a 4G 2.0 but that is not true the modulation is very different. So these millimeter waves arent in use yet for 5G but for Elon Musk Starlink satellites. They are using 30Ghz. From my experience the reading of the Safe and Sound were also higher than the one of the Cornet. While the Cornet had quite the same as the Gigahertz I also once had. So it looks like the Safe and Sound do give higher readings or what is your conclusion? For very sensitive persons the Acousticom and Safe and Sound are better because they are more sensitive than Cornet or Gigahertz when it goes bellow 1µW what still can be an issue for electrosensitive persons.
I like the Cornet as well. I think it is quite accurate for the price. It's hard to say if the SSPro is giving higher readings than accurate, because we can only compare to other meters, of which we don't know if they're accurate or not. I fully trust the manufacturers of this meter though. I think its the best personally.
@@cathycooke One possible explanation could be that the SSPro is the newest of all and its better adjusted to get the short pulses of the newer 4G 5G modulation. Maybe thats why it read a bit more?
@@Gieszkanne Yes could be!
One of the founders / engineers of SSPro gives a presentation with a slide of the frequency response of that meter around 26min mark ua-cam.com/video/HWFnll8cMCc/v-deo.html
I was surprised how not flat it was. Worth examining and noting where the dips and exaggerations are for that meter. They’re fairly proud of the frequency response so I can only imagine other manufacturers are much worse in comparison around the same price range.
how about Cornet electrosmog meter?
The Cornet is good. I recommend it as an entry level meter or for homeowners that can't afford the more expensive meters. IT's not nearly as sensitive as this one, but it does also test Efields and Magnetic fields which is great.
If you are very sensitive I would rather take the Acousticom 2 or Safe and Sound.
The problem is the Safe And Sound Pro 2 and the Acoustimeter gives completely different readings.
Do you mean their conclusions are different? They both measure Radio Freqeuncy. If you mean that one is higher than the other, I would agree with you.
The µW scale on the Acoustimeter is average! The peak scale is in V/m so you have to convert the readings to compare them.
HI HOW ARE YOU @Whole Home and Body Health
@Whole Home and Body Health CAN YOU HELP ME WITH A TEST ?
I hear your wireless router sound
It's not mine, I don't have Wireless in the house. It's my neighbors and their TV
The frequency of these radio waves are fast but not high enough to be able to damage DNA. Also the power of these waves are not so high but I am concerned about resonance.
That’s what we used to think, but plenty of research now shows even low intensity non ionizing radiation is harmful esp when exposed over long time durations. Many similar studies showing dna simply cannot repair itself which ultimately leads to disease or lesser quality of life. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189734/
RF Resonance is interesting though, haven’t gone down that rabbit hole.
@@MichaelMerritt personally I didn't believe too much that kind of research because many parameters are ignored. If you read so many medical research, you will understand everything is bad for the human body even drinking water, medical research isn't always true because they can't analyze all factors.If you read some study about sunlight you will understand even light is harmful. So what we know about low frequency and low power EMF, I think there is some kind of danger but not too much (everything is dangerous!!!) in the long period.
@@alvinfreeman8838 Well sure, all scientific research and discoveries can be dismissed with that line of thinking. Everyone obviously must determine what data and studies they find valid. Because I'm personally negatively effected by EMF's to the point where I'm essentially neurologically disabled until I turn off nearby wifi, I take EMF's pretty seriously. It's also clear other counties such as Germany also agree that safety guidelines should be much lower than they are in the united states so at least I'm not alone.