I admire your sincerity to your work.. even the Muslims have underrated this great general Al Walid, but you have shown us his greatness and that's very admired..
Important note about the battle. Muslim reinforcements were ordered to come in a small steady stream of reinforcements to make it seem like it was a never ending supply of new warriors. This was made to boost the morale of the muslim fighters and instill fear in their opponents. What the sassisinids didn't know is that some of those ''reinforcements'' were actually troops who were ordered to leave the army and come back in waves. Psychological warfare, muslim generals of that time were something special.
@nimmivids they had spies instead of feeding false intelligence,i wasn't aware that much of it too until i stumbled on a podcast of a History war analyst that emphasised on this aspect of the strategies and why early Muslims, were so successful in intelligence without using woman to lure men in bed and use wine for obtaining secretes i think this is unique to Muslims back in the day...Man we still don't know much i must re-visit the history of that era and learn more now with different level of understanding and point of views
@@fadlya.rahman4113 if i remember correctly, it was against Persian Army when they had trouble fighting Elephants, Before Oubaida Ibn aljarah, sick on bed dying figured it out that pikeman and archers should aim for elephant's eyes instead of it's body
@Saeed Alfalasi cowardliness and brothers killing each other for wealth and woman is present across all human History ( i bet you know story of Able and Kan) the only variable here is the good's people reaction, and it doesn't matter if they are few if we learn anything from history numbers isn't really a factor in winning. it's when the good people start fighting back that matters what you should say is people now are numb and this won't be forever
@@JasonDoe1000 that 1 on 1, that enemy's ego was equivalent to 1000 people...while Khalid has no ego if he had one why didn't he fight back against Umar ibn khatab when he removed him from being a commander and even after being removed he still help the other commander who succeeded him...do you know why he was removed because people are starting to idolize him because of him being undefeated instead of thinking its from God. With his popularity he can have a follower to revolt but he didn't.
"He also won against the allied sassinid byzantine army" You say that so casually.. he defeated the combined forces, tactics, and technology of the two greatest empires at the time.
He was a good commander. But the main reason he was able to defeat the Byzantine and Sassanids was because two great empires had spent the previous 30 years fighting each other over the Levant, and weakening their nations to the breaking point. Without the Byzantine-Persian wars Khalid's chances would have been much lower.
@@TonyTars the Arabs were outnumbered in all fights anyway, and they lost almost none, the result would've been the same in the end, it might just have taken longer. Keep in mind that he also isn't the only good general the Arabs had, they also had the better fighters winning all those duels. Ofcourse, them being weakened helped, but I wouldn't say that it was the main reason.
@@abdmzn You bring up having better fighters in duels. How many of the best Persian and Byzantine fighters do you think had already died by the time they took on the Muslims? In fact let's reverse the scenario: the Arabs fight for 30 years, then try to take on the fresh armies of Persia and Byzantine! There is no way we can ignore the three decades of war and the effect they had on the Persian and Byzantine armies. It's simply not fair or logical. The Persians even had a civil war for 3-4 years AFTER the 30 year war, right before taking on the Arabs! Despite all that, it took Arabs 20 years to occupy all of Persia. If it took 20 years for Persians to lose after decades of fighting the Byzantines and among themselves, I honestly don't think Arabs would have been able to defeat them under normal conditions.
@@TonyTars it only took 20 years because it was a large Empire and wasn't easy to occupy by the Arabs while fighting the Byzantines, after the events of this video, it was clean up basically. And no, it really doesn't matter, the Arabs still had a massive disadvantage in numbers and technology, and they won against both Empires, losing close to no battles.
Logic: attack the Persian empire then when you subjugate it turn to the Byzantine empire. Khalid Ibn Al-Walid: I don't have time for that, combine the two and meet me in the battlefield in 10 minutes :3
According to Islamic sources, Ibn Waleed was so successful in his wars, so the soldiers under his command started to speculate that they win all the time because of their leader. Umar talked to Al Waleed and took all his commanding titles away from him, before the speculation damaged the soldiers religious belief against an unbeatable iconic figure. Al Waleed took the decision very politely and joined the army back again as a regular soldier.
ms wpwm The Islam as religion did not spread through sword the state or the Islamic empire did When you read in history you will find out the we Muslims did not force anyone into the Islam. yeah we force Jezeia (the money that you pay for believing in religion other than Islam) but still we can consider it as taxes of some sort even the amount that they pay were not to expensive according to some historians. we Muslims pay more in zakah ( which is a charity that you have to give to the poor people after Ramadan in the first day of eid) Of course I am talking about what usually happened after taking the land before taking the land we give the three choices war, believing and jezeia
ms wpwm and about the terrorist those people are even condemned in Islam we are not making heros of them actually they were exist even back day in the Islamic golden age we call them the The Kharijites they believe that every sinner is non believer they have the same ideas of isis And the made a lot of troubles for the Kalefa back then
ms wpwm well I cannot deny this these wars and battles are use to brainwash people to join to isis and the other terrorist groups But c’mone anything can be used in good or in bad these wars were huge success that they put its mark in the history and put the foundation of the Islamic culture You can’t blame people for being proud of their ancestors look I know that war not a good thing but these wars were needed to establish the cultures back then
ms wpwm ok criticize Islam but don’t tell us to change our faith to fit your beliefs or your culture From my prospective of view I think that religion should not be change otherwise it will lose its divinity and holiness All those religions that you are mention did not get the same hate or the same attack that Islam get through the history so people when criticizing Islam criticize the fact that Islam is not accept liberalism our the western morals and that not fair
the enemy leader sent a message to al walid threatning him that he have to retreat as they outnumber him , he responded with a message says " i came to you with a people that love dying as much as your men love living "
when al waleed was on his bed dying he said "I have fought in a hundred battles and there is no inch in my body has ether a blow by sword or throw with arrow or stab with a spear and here Im dying on my bed " he said that because he want to die in battlefield like the other martyrs , May Allah have khaled ibn Al waleed in his paradise with his Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him
This Also proves for us Muslims, Allah Gives you Life and Death when he wishes. Otherwise the whole world can't kill you if He (Allah) don't want you to die. Thanks For commenting this.
sir, ibn waleed was called as the sword of allah...so that if he dies in a battle, it will be said Allah's sword is broken... Allah wants him not to die in a battle
@Jakeeyy1009 Seljuks haven't conquered all of Byzantinian empire, they just moved forward a little bit, the eastern part of Byzantinian empire was already a part of the Arabs, Haran, Al Ruha, were Anatolian cities that were a part of the Arab empires.
@Jakeeyy1009 Do you know why the Sassanid Empire failed or where the Sassanid descendants are now? Do you know that before the Sassanid civil war, the kings of Eastern Rome had to respect the Sassanid kings and the Sassanid kings were called the king of kings? Do you know that the Sassanid army defeated the 300,000-strong Turkish army with only twelve thousand men? But why did they lose to the Arabs if the Arabs had already attacked the Sassanid rule but were easily repelled?
Just look at this.. each time the muslim faught. The enemy outnumbered them.. but it is not the number which wins in a battle.. it is the will power to fight until death
It's great that fans are suggesting battles from this era. I never expected anyone to chronicle these since the Rashidun caliphate is one of the most underrated of all conquering powers in history and Khalid bin Walid, easily the most underrated general of all time. I hope you keep covering battles from this era and also do other ones on Khalid
I wouldn't call Khalid bin Walid underrated. In Europe perhaps, but ask anyone in the middle east who is the greatest general of all time, they will answer Khalid bin Walid. (or maybe Saladin)
During this battle, the Arabs built elephant like statues and made their horses sleep near them at night in order to get used to fighting elephants. Arabian horses are smart they adapted and on the final day they did not panic around elephants and that helped the arabs gain an advantage.
Hm... I don't know if that is true. I read (second punic war) that horses run from elephants because of there smell. Yet, Hannibal's horses were used to them. Arabs could not bring smell on theirs models of elephants.
read more brother Khaled always challenged the enemies commander in duels but they were too smart not to accept .. because rip to those who accepted. Khaled was one of the very few who always fought dual blades and moved the horse with his legs .. the only mentioned warrior who did that as well in the Muslims was (Al-Zubair ibn Al-Awwam)
“Do not say that! How few are the Romans and how numerous are we ! 'An army's strength lies not in numbers of men but in Allah's help, and its weakness lies in being forsaken by Allah” -- Khalid ibn al-Walid
"I know more about Khalid than anyone else, no man is luckier than he. No man is his equal in war. No people face Khalid in battle, be they strong or weak, but are defeated. Take my advice and make peace with him." Prince Ukaid of Domat ul Jandal. (633 A.D)
"We have 30 books left from Muslim Andulasia so that we could split an atom, if half of the 1 million burned books could survive we have already travelled between galaxies in space" - Pierre Curie
@@mohaimenulimam233 Let him be bro Wallahi he doesn't in any way touch the might of islam history nor any of my feelings. However I can clearly smell his rage because he has nothing to say watching this video. قل موتوا بغيظكم
What a gap between civilizations we have today, we westerners know and greet so many generals but I am sure that many of us haven't heard of this extremely good general Al-Walid.
Convict Con He was a man of great honor. He was nicknamed (the sword of Allah) by the prophet Mohamed. Never lost a battle before accepting Islam or after accepting it. An absolute beast...a warrior.
Some of the comments here... I think I will need therapy down the line, or maybe a beer, or 10. Donate to our personal beer/therapy fund - Patreon: www.patreon.com/KingsandGenerals or Paypal: paypal.me/kingsandgenerals :-)
Ummm the cacus belli for the war was the financial backing for several revolts and uprisings that sassanids had funded and supported raiding tribes on the border of the two states and the byzantines had killed a muslim envoy and fought the muslims in raids and skirmishes
Arab sources say that Khaled bin Al-Waleed never lost a battle in his life, even when he was against the Muslims at the beginning of his life, this great man
@@sasaniansoldier7118 ah yes a keyboard warrior which is one of the lowest class of warrior throughout the history...rip man you could've been a better person but instead you chooses to be one of those pathethic people
It boggles the mind. Khalid bin Waleed had like a 100% success rate. Most of the time the odds were not in his favor. Mind you, he was a general, one of the most difficult jobs in the world and to achieve a spotless record there may be the most impressive career of all time. Well done video again! Thanks!
@@runi5413 Even if that was true , in order to gather all these as you call "nomadic horse-cultured" and incredibly stubborn people while starting from scratch in a matter of 30 years , don't you think that is miraculous ?
@@runi5413 It's ok no offense taken . It's true the conditions were similar , but you have to consider how Genghis Khan came to rule . He killed a brother a close friend in order to rise up to power , allied himself with the Jin to take down the Tatar just to invade them later. Genghis Khan's goals were materialistic , he fought for the spoils of war , Indeed he was a great military leader but with such materialistic ambitions meant that the greatest empire of his won't last and it did fall. On the other hand Prophet Mohamed didn't start by killing anyone . He only spread the word of God and sadly in return his followers were tortured and killed. When he took shelter in madina they welcomed him as most of them converted to islam by their own choice . And from there you can see a lot of battles started by the non-muslims which the muslims won , even though there was a huge difference in numbers (3:1 sometimes 4:1).
@@runi5413 The messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم establish peace sense he arrived at madinah with the 3 Jewish tribes Bani al-Nader, Bani Qaenoqaa, and Bani Goraeda the first two break their promise and try to kill him secretly so he command them to leave The last one betrayed him in battle the prophet was surrounded by 10000 pagan Arabs around madinah and they did not manage to enter the city until the jews let them in and support the pagans with 5000 jews In the end Allah supported his messenger with a cold strong wind that throw away the enemy camp and the jews were killed for what they did يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ ٱذۡكُرُواْ نِعۡمَةَ ٱللَّهِ عَلَيۡكُمۡ إِذۡ جَآءَتۡكُمۡ جُنُودٌ فَأَرۡسَلۡنَا عَلَيۡہِمۡ رِيحًا وَجُنُودًا لَّمۡ تَرَوۡهَا ۚ وَڪَانَ ٱللَّهُ بِمَا تَعۡمَلُونَ بَصِيرًا O you who have believed, remember the favor of Allah upon you when armies came to [attack] you and We sent upon them a wind and armies [of angels] you did not see. And ever is Allah, of what you do, Seeing. إِذۡ جَآءُوكُم مِّن فَوۡقِكُمۡ وَمِنۡ أَسۡفَلَ مِنكُمۡ وَإِذۡ زَاغَتِ ٱلۡأَبۡصَـٰرُ وَبَلَغَتِ ٱلۡقُلُوبُ ٱلۡحَنَاجِرَ وَتَظُنُّونَ بِٱللَّهِ ٱلظُّنُونَا۟ [Remember] when they came at you from above you and from below you, and when eyes shifted [in fear], and hearts reached the throats and you assumed about Allah [various] assumptions. هُنَالِكَ ٱبۡتُلِىَ ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنُونَ وَزُلۡزِلُواْ زِلۡزَالاً شَدِيدًا There the believers were tested and shaken with a severe shaking. وَأَنزَلَ ٱلَّذِينَ ظَـٰهَرُوهُم مِّنۡ أَهۡلِ ٱلۡكِتَـٰبِ مِن صَيَاصِيهِمۡ وَقَذَفَ فِى قُلُوبِهِمُ ٱلرُّعۡبَ فَرِيقًا تَقۡتُلُونَ وَتَأۡسِرُونَ فَرِيقًا And He brought down those who supported them among the People of the Scripture from their fortresses and cast terror into their hearts [so that] a party you killed, and you took captive a party. Al Quran 33 9 The end of mongols that they embrace Islam and follow our faith
@I NSA Where did you get the idea that Persia did not give the world anything,,no scientists ,, no books ,, no universities ..etc Actually, there was an “Iranian Golden Age” before the “Islamic Golden Age”, and the latter was actually a continuation of the former. Ibn Nadim mentions a long list of pre-Islamic Pahlavi books which were still available in the 4th century A.H. in Baghdad. Have a look at that list (Al-Fihrist). Biruni also has mentioned a number of pre-Islamic books in his works, particularly in The Remaining Signs of Past Centuries - Wikipedia. The works of Islamic scholars directly reference literature on various scientific, mathematical, philosophical, and theological disciplines from pre-Islamic Iran. Biruni mentioned another story which shows there was a scientific tradition in Ancient Persia: When Qutaibah bin Muslim under the command of Al-Hajjaj bin Yousef was sent to Khwarazmia with a military expedition and conquered it for the second time, he swiftly killed whomever wrote the Khwarazmian native language that knew of the Khwarazmian history, science and culture. He then killed all their Zoroastrian priests and burned and wasted their books, until gradually the illiterate only remained, who knew nothing of writing and hence their history was mostly forgotten. So, there were books and libraries in Khwarazm (likely in Khwarazmian language) when Arabs invaded Iran. However, in the early centuries of Islam, many Pahlavi books were translated into Arabic (the “current” language of science), and there was no need for those works anymore (so nobody cared to copy those books and they were lost). This way, at least the content of some of those books were preserved to some extent. Unfortunately, many of the translated works were destroyed during the Mongol invasion. Also, read about Gundeshapur university in pre-islamic time in Persia- Wikipedia
You missed a MAJOR point, Elephants didn't ran back and drowned themselves in river for no reason, Saad(R.A) sent forward his camels wearing black curtains and sheets on them with heavy roaming voices, which obviously panicked elephants.
When I see otoman battles, I cry... the heart of christianism a so beauty, avanced technologically land like Bizance destroyed by a cult of a pedophile of desert😭😭
@@luanlopes9415 And that insult was really unnecessary, muslims in general were never known to be pedophiles, you shouldn't talk that way about the people. And the ottomans were mostly not arab people coming from the desert, they were mixed people with a variety of ethnicities and origins (Arminians, Slavs, Kurds, Turcs...etc)
@@danielperez232 you are repeating a statement you heard from an atheist who heard from another atheist and form another. Rationalise by yourself and being atheist doesn't always mean you are right because of science. Science is constantly changing its not fixed how can you believe in something that changes regular
This was the one two punch that pushed the Early Islamic conquest unto the world stage. A massive blow to the Byzantine at Yarmouk and this battle gave the offensive initiative to the Arabs. In the course of the next 100 years the Caliphate would spread from Al Andalus in Spain to the Indus River valley - nicely done!
Affan Ahsan Byzantine almost don't have a record about the battle. About Persian, I don't know. Maybe they don't want to write it because they lose? Who knows? Only God who knows the answer.
What absolutely amazes me the contempt, the hate of Hazrat Khalid ibn al Walid RA towards cowardice. Even his last words were: "May the eyes of coward never sleep."
@Jojo Momo yeah, i just want to remind you about hadith Prophet Muhammad Saw. That if you eat halal food from non-muslim (which is not slaughtered by Allah's name) before you eat say Bismillah.
Got to admit that Khalid Ibn Walid was undoubtedly the toughest warrior throughout history. He led more than 100 bloody battle, less equipped, the enemies are always outnumbered, yet never lost a single war !! WOW just unbelievable !!
To add to above fought numerous 1 on 1 battles on almost all of the battles , Omar Razi Ullah tallah unhu rightly said "let the women grieve over khalid as no mother will give birth to another khalid al walid" Subhan ALLAH , Razi ALLAH Anhum Wa Razi Unhu
Both defining battles against the Byzantines (Battle of Yarmuk), and the Sassanids (Battle of Al Qadissiyah) occurred on the same year. Most of the same army was also used in Al Qadissiyah in Novemeber of 636. Here's a short timeline on the major events 3 years before and after 636 AD: 633: Campaigns in Bahrain, Oman, Yemen, and Hadramaut. Raids in Iraq.Battle of Chains, Battle of Saniyy, Battle of Walaja, Battle of Ullais, Battle of Hira, Battle of Al-Anbar, Battle of Ayn al-Tamr, Battle of Dawmat al-Jandal, Battle of Firaz. 634: 22 August- Death of Abu Bakr, the first caliph of Islam. Umar ibn al-Khattab assumes power as the second caliph. 634: Battle of Bosra, Battle of Damascus, Battle of Ajnadin. Death of Abu Bakr. Battle of Namaraq, Battle of Saqatia. 635: Battle of Bridge, Battle of Buwaib, Conquest of Damascus, Battle of Fahl. 636: Battle of Yarmuk, Battle of al-Qādisiyyah, Conquest of Madain. 637: Conquest of Syria, Conquest of Jerusalem, Battle of Jalula. 638: Conquest of Jazirah (Mesopotamia) 639: Conquest of Khuzistan (Persia). Advance into Egypt. Plague of Emmaus. Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_7th-century_Muslim_history
It has nothing to do with "Muhammadan", "Francescan" or "Daoist" legends. It's a documented historic battle that is studied by all history majors in all reputable universities and even military academies. "The legacy of the Battle of Yarmuk was both far reaching and profound. First, and most immediately, the defeat at Yarmuk led to the permanent loss of the entire Byzantine East (Syria, Palestine, Mesopotamia, and Egypt), which seriously undermined the Byzantine Empire’s fiscal and military capabilities." Source: historycooperative.org/heraclius-and-the-early-islamic-conquests-an-analysis-of-byzantine-military-failure-at-the-battle-of-yarmuk-in-ad-636/
Iranian version of Islam is watered down and mixed considerably with Zoroastrian traditions. Iranians are now using shia Islam to control and manipulate the Arab population to our advantage. Iran is supporting shias in Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, etc. to gain more influence. Islam in Iran is dead. It's just a political tool to influence/control others.
Kings and Generals lool it's an Arab tradition. Checkout Arab pre-Islamic history if you want to learn more about yhe signficant of these pre battle duels... Also a good pre-Islamic Arab Sassinid Battle is Thi Qar.
to all muslims here praising muslim's victory .. there is only one reason Allah gave them victory against these mighty empires .. it was there righteous deeds and justice ..
human b eing No, Arab warriors were ruthless, intelligent and tactical ,especially Khalid ,Islam only united them ,but Christian kingdoms in Europe were also united by religion ,this doesn't mean that Christianity is a true religion
Christopher Carter He’s right. We only won, because of how righteous we were. We became divided when we lost our deen, and now the western forces take advantage of that, and even have documents that say Muslims should never be united. But In Shaa Allah we will be back. It’s been prophesied.
Christopher Carter As Muslims we believe Allah allows who He (SWT) wills to win. Muslims win, and lose. Heck we’ve been loosing a lot since ancient times has passed. When we lose our way. We lose. When we are on the right path we win. I’m just going by what my deen teaches us. There’s a reason for everything. We Muslims needed to lose badly to come back stronger In Shaa Allah
@@alimoradi8454 That's bcs the ummayads caliphs were on each other's throats And then the abbasids ended their rains but it was Arabs not Persians Persians came later
Khalid ibn al-Walid(RA) Quotes: - "When Allah decides a matter, it is done." - "I have dedicated my life to the way of Allah, Most High." - "Man intends one thing, but Allah intends another." - "The earth destroys its fools, but the intelligent destroy the earth." - "If you are truthful you will survive. If you lie you shall perish." - "When I am in the battlefield, I love it more then when I am in my house." - "The rainy night when I am standing wearing armor with sword and shield in my hand and looking again and again towards the eastern horizon, waiting for sun to rise so that I could start the battle."
@@lennydale92 why can't you enjoy history, discuss it and learn from it while respecting everybody else who came for the matter? Warfare is a part is a part of every nation history whatever its causes were. Thus we should discuss it sophisticatedly instead of using it to unnecessarly cause strife and hate
@@chediamor3607 I would enjoy it if it wasn't for fanatical Muslims claiming it's a victory for their ideology. The same Muslims who will pretend it's a religion of peace.
Do you know that battles of AL-Qadsiyaah and Yarmouk took place in two months of that time period. Muslims used to be great war tacticians. If you read their history, you will find out that in many cases while outnumbered by the opposition still they managed through war tactics, high morale and incredible leadership to eventually win.
i doubt they could be portrayed perfectly especially Badr, and to lesser account Tabook. by taking method of modern revisionism history discipline. too much miracles flown on all reliable accounts of Hadith oral sources only Allah almighty knows. even i used to be involved in Wikipedia Battle of Mu'tah revisions & editings we have faced tough problems to meet the requirement of modern encyclopedic standard. too many disagreements between editors. which in the end we published the last conservative version. and whenever i looked again very much did not satisfy as too many critical firsthand sources information we decided to butcher many parts of it. hope you understand if i disagree with this idea May Allah bless you
it's rare to see these two flags together nowadays ☹. politics is the Devil tool "Allahum join our hearts, mend our social relationship, guide us to the path of peace, bring us from darkness to light, save us from obscenities, outward or inward, and bless our ears, our eyes, our hearts, our spouse, our children, and relent toward us; Thou art the Relenting, the Merciful. And make us grateful for Thy blessing and make us praise it while accepting it and give it to us in full" greeting from Saudi Arabia.
Every campain of Khalid ibn Al-Walid deserve a documentary. From Uhud to Mutah to Yarmuk to Wallaja to Firaz to Iron Bridge. A true military genious. According to your policy you are making most of the decesive ones. Thanks for covering others too. I think "Sword of Allah" by A I Akram will be Helpful.
If you lead a significantly stronger army, personal duel is about the worst thing you can do, in terms of tactics. Pride, honour? The commander was supposed to lead his me and win the battle, this way he got killled, caused demoralization of his army and potentially caused fall of the two of the most ancient empires - the Persian and the Roman. But I guess at least he preserved his honour...
+nimmivids Yes, but only if you have the smaller army. When your army is twice the size of the enemy, its most likely better odds to just use your superior strenght to win the battle.
Alexander Christopher here’s the thing though, when they were the Arabs, they were weak, divided, hated each other, and killed each other, They never formed a country or any sort of United state, This victory was for the Muslims not the Arabs! Just look at what Arab nationalism has done to Arabs today, back to being weak and divided and hating each other. And I say that as an Arab myself.
@@AM-bj7yo I'm not arab but I do hope someday that all the arabs will unite and love each other. There's nothing impossible to ALLAH. And when that happens, the turks and all other Muslim nation will join the unity. ALLAHUMMA ameen.
@Belmin Hodzic Do not be a bitch, I hate Islam, I am Iranian, you know a Shapur from all Iranian names, idiot, I do not like the name of Amir, we Iranians are not Muslims and we do not like Islam, why do you support bloody Islam?
@Belmin Hodzic I must say that our ruler is apparently a Shiite and the people do not like Islam. If you do not know Shiite is Zoroastrian because we Iranians made it Iranian, we added Zoroastrian and Iranian customs and laws to it. I hate Islam because it is because they destroyed books and cities and killed people. I hope you have a good day too
Man Khalid ibn Walid is a legendary general and warrior, he went on a campaign against not only one but two mighty empires with an army which has standard equipment, no reinforcements and low supply lines. He was facing armies which were far more superior in both numbers and equipment. He defeated ALL facing armies with just 1 army. He is just unbelievable.
Those people who are saying that muslims defeated the Sassanids and the Byzantines cause they got weak fighting among themselves should know that after the death of Prophet Muhammad there was a huge rebellion in which thousands muslims died and the muslims were fighting both the Sassanids and Byzantine at the same time.... both superpowers were superior in numbers and had modern weapons of their time as compared to Arabs...
They won because of the high moral witch comes from true believe in their faith and they have a great leader who is both smart and brave he start the fight and ask for a dull at day one to kill the moral of his enemy what a great leader he never lost a battle even when he battled Muslims before he convert on ohud battle
The Arabian peninsula is isolated and manageable and these two massive empires are so busy with unending war they lose 50,000 troops to 20,000 army, that's how. Civil War doesn't matter, it's a desert and it's pretty easy to learn where the people are when you live in an inhospitable place such as the dunes.
I cry tears when I hear their stories and the efforts they made to make Islam strong and spread the word of Allah in the lands. may Allah grants them the highest place in heaven. For those who wonder how enormous armies get defeated by much fewer ones, here is the answer: Allah says in Surat anafal "in the context of war (the battle of Badr, 300 vs 1000)" verses(65,66) [[O Prophet, urge the believers to battle. If there are among you twenty [who are] steadfast, they will overcome two hundred. And if there are among you one hundred [who are] steadfast, they will overcome a thousand of those who have disbelieved because they are a people who do not understand.## Now, Allah has lightened [the hardship] for you, and He knows that among you is weakness. So if there are from you one hundred [who are] steadfast, they will overcome two hundred. And if there are among you a thousand, they will overcome two thousand by permission of Allah . And Allah is with the steadfast]] When you believe, then you have nothing to lose. Allah says in Surat Tawba verses 51,52 : [[Say, "Never will we be struck except by what Allah has decreed for us; He is our protector." And upon Allah let the believers rely.##Say, "Do you await for us except one of the two best things while we await for you that Allah will afflict you with punishment from Himself or at our hands? So wait; indeed we, along with you, are waiting."]] The two best things? Victory or Heavens (after death). The stronger can keep his faith not endangered, therefore not changed. Remember this.
i think mainly the ingenuity of kahild bin walid. If it were strictly due to faith muslims wouldnt have lost in battle of Uhud, when muhammed himself was leading the army. They were against khalid bin walid, his strategies won his wars even when he was a belligerent to muslims.
every day you prove that you deserve my admiration of your historic channel you deserve to be on the top if you are not on the to already now by your awesome videos
ENERGY do you just know how many things ancient nations in general did can be considered crimes against humanity using modern logic? Basically their very existance was a crime against humanity
ENERGY these Arab army were more merciful then others as they didn't execute every disbeliever of the city Which false historical event are you following
The early Muslim Arab warriors used short swords that hang from a baldric in the Roman Byzantine Style, they also used spears that were were longer than their enemies. Straight swords were used by early Arab armies even the Islamic Kingdom of Al Andalus in Spain had straight swords., Curved swords became popular when the Seljuk Turks introduced them in the Middle East during the 12th century
When I read history and see how the Arabs suddenly turned from scattered tribes into a superpower that defeated all the kingdoms and empires of the earth, I realize that Muhammad was a great prophet f and really had the help of God
Does that mean that God likes bloodshed? If not, then the death of many thousands was a "necessary sacrifice"? Then why did he not help to subjugate and convert the whole world to the "true faith".
@@dominikkacprzak If you read history, you'll know that Muslims treated people humanely, unlike the Armanian and Persian Empire. That's why many people have entered Islam, and those who do not convert to Islam prefer to be ruled by Muslims.
10:23 you can make a full movie on the bravery of the muslim cavalry that marched on an entire army with no backup or reserve to kill rostam , AND made it back .
@ i don't care what you think , i've never seen a division of a couple hundred men making a full frontal attack on a full army on it's own with no tactical advantage what so ever breaking through their ranks killing their leader . that's not tactics , just pure bad-ass courage .
I love him as an awesome warrior and general who lived and fought with honor, but I hate him for the cause he was fighting for and how this cause would grow so big and monstrous, directly because of his successes. Truly a conflicted feeling.
Actually , Shiat hate him because he took the power from Ali ... Ali was the one who advise him ton just send 1/3 of troops from levant to reinforce army in Qaddasiye ....
Well I'm also Iranian so don't use your nationality as excuse to hate since, Shia had always problems with other Muslim, they basically hate all prophet companions, his wives, and Khalifa Plus early Iranian were all sunni and they had no hatred toward omar or others, you can see it in all famous poetry, God bless you:)
well , you don't see shia as muslims ( and that why you just see kiliing them is key for going to heaven ) so don't talk in shoes of iranian majority ... idiot ...
Hopefully hate on both sides will disappear. Iranians were the backbone of Islamic golden age and have a great civilization, sassan is just a dynasty that disappeared but Iranians remained
@@maddmaddox1648 No he did'nt Khalid was not highest commander in mutah there were three commanders in that army Prophet Muhammad ordered muslims to to choose on of them if anyone fell but three of the commander lost thier lives fighting so muslims give command to Khalid Ibn Walid he ralied the forces and ordered a organized retreat to save muslims
At the beginin you mentioned the Muslim general Khalid ibn elwalid. He was a genius military commander. Although his armies were always outnumbered , he NEVER lost a battle . He fought and won over 100 battles.
well these 2 empires were getting constantly attacked on multiple fronts, had plague and more economic problems coming from the fact that they were pretty old and never than less they were fighting eachothers since centuries, muslim surely did an amazing campaign but the empires were surely not at their peak
Ask any real educated human being, Islam copied christianism. And christianism (like Islam) copied other religions or changed to adjust in other religions to gain poppularity. And you can't prove that any god exists. Before comment again, tell him to meet me and then tell him to delete my comment :P Also Christians teach in their colleges (theological colleges) that god doesn't exists and religions exist only to help people mentaly and help the poor. Thats why Christians are at the top of this planet and muslims beg to enter those countries. ps My comment is still here, your god can't even find a free wifi :P
So Christians wrote a fairytale and Islam based on it and "correct it". Islam copied Christianity AND changed/added some things so the same power of the pope/patriarchs etc could go to their imams and leaders. Thats why there are a lot of versions of every religion and especially thats why you will find orders in quran and bible that suits the needs of the leaders and not the humanity in general. I doesn't make sense? Quran accept jesus and other figures like older prophets as a vary important figures and messegeres of god, but at the same time they don't agree with them.. Like jesus was a very elect and highly esteemed messenger of God but all his students, so jesus too was a troll spreading lies. What a serious religion! ps Your god still sleeping? Where is he? Are you going to prove that god exist or not? I mean its not that hard to prove that god exists, if he trully exist! I suppose he doesn't need a lift to come here! haha
It's also because of the dangerous ideology of Mohammed that promised Arabs wealth and women in both lives. If you die, you'll be in heaven with huris and if you manage to defeat the Romans and Persians, you'll be able to plunder their wealth and rape their women and take them in to slavery!
@@soniahemmati2372 The coward, if you give him the money of the whole earth, will not fight bravely. That's why you have to recognize the superiority of the Arabs.... Before Islam the Arabs fought with the Persians in the battle of Dhi Qar and the Arabs won
@Yusuf patel Persian Empire population was 3.5 million at that time and his army killed around 1 million people that's not my figures Iranian historians and Zoroastrian records says that.....Persian were civilised while Arabs were nomads and nomads were on killing spree like Mongols
@Dingo Pelt yeah bcz it needs 100 years to butcher people raping women forcefull marriages ...jaziya taxes on non believers yeah it needs that much time ...
Here are the reasons the muslims won 1 they had great generals other than khalid like Amr bin as and abu ubaidah bin jarrah 2 Arabs were used to harsh climate and had a very nutritious diet 3 they were much more motivated as they believed that their death would grant them paradise the byzantines were not that much motivated unlike them 4 The army was disciplined and would not take bribes and was united unlike the others 5 God was with them
@@ahmadmuharam2088 yes that was probably 90% of it but also they did not massacre the population and promised freedom of religion allowing them to easily conquer cities
@ITS FACTZ mehmed was overall the best sultan but the problem was that all the sultans after sulieman were more concerned with their harem then they were in making the empire powerful
For me I cinsider Khalid ibn alwalid as the greatest leader ever! even when he was against islam in battle of auhd mountain when he led the cavarly he was very clever!
He won against Muslims just because Muslims did not fulfill the command of the greatest General Muhammad Pbuh .... If the group which was assigned on a mountain was not left by Muslims then Khalid Ibn Waleed R.A had no chance ..But it was PLan of ALLAH SWT that the same man became Muslim and became a one of the great general of Islam ... The beauty of Islam is that enemy became the protector of this religion in future like Mongols who were enemy but later the same Mongols accepted Islam
@@rajababy2009 and Khalid was present in baddar if you don't Know against Muslim he lost once and uhud was almost done if companions didn't leave the mountain but it was about to happen
And in history too The effect of his achievements still existed until today ! Every inch he liberate and conquer still in the hands of Muslims for 14500 years .. He a student of the messenger of Allah Mohamad , and Khalid is the sword of Allah
Khalid Bin Al-Walid didn't die in a battle he died because of a sickness. When he died he said " I got into a lot of battles in my life and there is no place on my body that does not have a scar from a sword or a spear or an arrow and here i am dying like a camel, cowards eyes do not sleep". showing that he wanted to die in a battle instead of a normal death, that what makes him a great leader and general who never lost a battle. Also in the beginning of Islam when he was not a Muslim he won a battle against muslims in the auhud battle.
@@immortal6453 that 'general' and his 'king' you're speaking of gave all their credit to God aswell, maybe learn from history instead of seeing the world through your atheistic shitstained eyes...
@@immortal6453 no power, no wins, no losses accept the will of Almighty God (Allah). HE supports the true believers and HE casts fear in the heart of the enemies. When muslims become pure in their beliefs and actions, they will be victorious again. The days are coming soon. Even Jesus (PBUH) will join us…
@@immortal6453 just that these guys wouldn't be fighting successfully without using Islamic meditations, chants and the Quranic guidelines. Arabs existed being trampled by the enemies but when Islam came by the Quran it was the opposite so yes credit goes to Islamic books and God
After these consecutive battles lost to muslims by Sassanid, two largest empire Sassanid and Byzantine of that time allied together and attacked the muslim forces by forgetting their 621 years of rivalry only to lose again....haha
@@pogchamp2897 ههههههههههههه that's very funny its fact that they were lite armoured (unlike the Persians )they don't like to work they like to trade there homeland is desert its pointless All ther pre-Islamic history is about trade kingdom's
for as long as i know, khalid bin walid almost spend his entire life on the battlefield or fighting, so no wonder he's already become great general + great warrior....and he muster his troops with best veteran.... but the fun fact is, lot of people (maybe after watch this video or read a book about this), asking why caliph umar didnt appoint khaled bin al-waleed to command the big army who will march to sasanid again..... the answer is.....khaled bin al-waleed already won too many battle and caliph umar afraid that people will start to worship khaled as some kind of demigod.... I really love this video, please keep posting :D
DjeieA KeksekI he wasn’t lmfao,if anyone raped it would be the Persian generals not someone who followed the Muslim code of war like Khalid ibn al waleed.
Its Lenin lots of butt hurt Iranians hate him for some reason,so they make shit up,if you find more of them just ask for their sources and they won’t give you anything.
+Sidahmed El Guebli wrong ... this didn't happen he is named since he was the greatest general and a great worrier and after he converted to Islam he gave him the title and from history we know that he didn't lose a war and he is one of the main reasons how Islam spread among the regions that previously controlled by the Sassanids or the Romans (that's why he is the sword of Allah)
Yes, you are right. I got my knowledge from a false video. May Allah forgive me. I just read that prophet Muhammad gave him the title ''Saifullah'' Edit: I deleted the comment for confusion.
Kudos to this channel. We learned about Khalid Ibn Al Waleed from our school history book but there many people around the world who never knew about this great Commander who was also a companion of our beloved Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).
Will you cover ancient chinese warfare tactics in the future? Seeing that the next total war historical era is set in china and after some readings i start to wonder about what an "eight gates formation" looks like or how sun tzu's art of war actually applied on a battlefield as interpreted by the generals who read them
Everyone is using sun tzu's art of war, every general with a bit of common sense used it. It is the most basic thing about warfare. Nothing fancy realy.
The book is mostly about logistics & the grand strategy outside of the battlefield, how to fight a war. It is a mistake to think its about how to fight battles. War is so much more than just shove men on to a field. And joe martin is a bit correct, every half-decent general should know the jist of that in their sleep.
Ahahah i see, all the more reason for a video to educate us more about this! Also i found another art of war written by sun bin with all these 10 formations: square formation, circle formation, spike formation, goose formation,hook formation, loose formation, numbered formation, fire formation, water formation, Xuanxiang formation... Again i've only read it in some internet forums and really wish a channel like this could help me visualize how it actually looks like (which is already granted thankfully :p)
wow, I'm a jew whos not only impressed but my mind is taking over, I have always studied Islamic history but noting of this comes, especially not in Europe, Walid was a warrior in my eyes a warrior that made alexander goes back to his graves, at alexander the greats time, it was an another demographic, another army that did not have the power nor the weapons to stand against his army, but under walids time, his army did not have any good equipment to stand against the foe, you can easily see the levels they were in
True That. There's nothing in being a Jew. During Roman rule, Jews were opressed and after Arab Conquest they were allowed to pray in Temple Mount. There were also Jews in the Early Muslim Conquest and were our friends in Muslim Spain. After 1492, the Jews were resettled in North Africa and Ottoman lands. Until Zionism and minority rule in Isreal after 1948, we were friends. We hate Isreal noy Jews
That’s like saying that nazi Germany was a very loving place, but since they didn’t win they were smeared. Basically that’s a pile of shit like reading Quran or bible for “historical” purposes
Mista Sissy Six History is actually very well preserved in the Quran. It even predicted the future of the Byzantine-sassanid war. Google it if you don’t believe me.
Everyone in the comment section talking about Khalid Ibn Walid, meanwhile commander who behind this masterpiece was Saad Ibn Abi Waqqas and Al-Qaqa Ibn Amr At Tamimi 😭
@@cenanmehmet that Genghis Khan not meet khalid the sword of Allah Genghis also pissed in his pants if he meet him once The undefeatable Khalid bin Waleed
Witch Chan Hezbollah are not Arabs. They are in Lebanon which is in the Arab League like some other countries. They don’t look like Arabs. Yes, they speak Arabic but they’re not pure arabs. Real Arabs are from the Arabian Peninsula.
The reason the caliphate went to war with the Persians was because the shah had publicly insulted their envoy and torn his letter to pieces in his court. This was considered an act of war.
Rex Galilae that happenned a long time before this, the main reason was that the Caliphate knew the Byzantines and Persians would eventually attack them anyway so they took the initiative. Attacking the Persians was initially for food supply and more converts while attacking the Levant was to secure trade and access to European seas. Egypt would also be useful for trade and more converts. Islam was spread along these conquests, but it was not the only reason.
+Santhomph "the Caliphate knew the Byzantines and Persians would eventually attack them anyway " Ahahahah! Where does this myth come from? How could anyone seriously believe the Persians and Romans would be interested in a giant desert which Arabia was at the time? Let alone that they would want war and expansion after nearly destroying themselves for 20 years. Seriously, where does this bullshit come from? I see it all the time as a justification for the Arab Conquests but it's patent bullshit.
+Mr Abdi You don't believe you need valid justification for invading and conquering someone else? So if I say that Israel should just get the entire Middle East because their economy and living standards are way better than the other states, would you be ok with that? I don't think so. Anyway, you're sidestepping from my point. The Persians and Romans were not planning to invade Arabia, this is nonsense. The Arabs were planning to spread their empire into the Levant and Mesopotamia beforehand and siezed the smallest casus beli to justify it. There's nothing wrong about admitting that these conquests were agressive wars, the Romans and Persians did agressive wars all the time too. But spare me some bullshit narrative about how the poor Arabs were just defending themselves from an imminent fictional invasion by foreigners. Also don't thumb up your own comments, it makes you look a little pretentious.
marvelfannumber1 The truth is that Muslims have a bad habit of invading land of others. They justify it with weird reasons later. Just accept it. You wanted wealth, woman and converts for your religion.
Awesome, as usual. Khalid ibn Alwaleed can be ranked as high as Sun tzu in terms of military brilliance, if not even higher. It's a shame that he, for some reason, is ignored most of the time.
Spot on for he beat the super powers at the time the romans 1000yrs and the persians 10,000 yrs and never lost a battle too. He helped to create an empire that is still unchanged in terms of religious dominance with in that area, Sun Tzus impact in his region is nothing in comparison.
Sassanian and Byzantine "chained" error - The the term silsilah, translated to "chained" was a colloquial term from al-Tabari's Histories. It was not only used to describe Sassanian infantry, but Byzantine and Sassanian cavalry. It was the "Byzantine" systems or more correctly professionally drilled troops, whether foot or horse. The term "chained" means moving as one or one body for that formation. See History of al-Tabari Vol. 12 pages 54 & 55 Note # 206 - Dr. L. Conrad maintains that the term silsilah, which is used in some of these texts, originally referred to a Byzantine military formation... Which is makes all the more remarkable for the Muslim victories during the Sassanian civil war at that time. Thank you for your great work!
I mean did they actually think that was gonna make their troops stronger? If so then they deserved to lose haha. I mean maybe it made them more disciplined and willing to fight, but I seriously doubt that chaining your troops together had any tactical advantage.
New and updated video: ua-cam.com/video/r2cEIDZwG5M/v-deo.html
I like how in the new video a different version of the battle is depicted. Shows that there is not a definitive agreed version.
I admire your sincerity to your work.. even the Muslims have underrated this great general Al Walid, but you have shown us his greatness and that's very admired..
@Jojo Momo He only killed omar.
Arab caliphate Omar was killed by Piruz Nahavandi after Persians' defeat.
@Jojo Momo You are right about the guards but i don't think he would kill innocent people.
Important note about the battle. Muslim reinforcements were ordered to come in a small steady stream of reinforcements to make it seem like it was a never ending supply of new warriors. This was made to boost the morale of the muslim fighters and instill fear in their opponents. What the sassisinids didn't know is that some of those ''reinforcements'' were actually troops who were ordered to leave the army and come back in waves. Psychological warfare, muslim generals of that time were something special.
Interesting note.
@nimmivids they had spies instead of feeding false intelligence,i wasn't aware that much of it too until i stumbled on a podcast of a History war analyst that emphasised on this aspect of the strategies and why early Muslims, were so successful in intelligence without using woman to lure men in bed and use wine for obtaining secretes i think this is unique to Muslims back in the day...Man we still don't know much i must re-visit the history of that era and learn more now with different level of understanding and point of views
Isn't that during the battle of Mu'tah? Khalid faked reinforcement to stop the Byzantine army from pursuing a retreating Muslim army.
@@fadlya.rahman4113 if i remember correctly, it was against Persian Army when they had trouble fighting Elephants, Before Oubaida Ibn aljarah, sick on bed dying figured it out that pikeman and archers should aim for elephant's eyes instead of it's body
@Saeed Alfalasi cowardliness and brothers killing each other for wealth and woman is present across all human History ( i bet you know story of Able and Kan)
the only variable here is the good's people reaction, and it doesn't matter if they are few if we learn anything from history numbers isn't really a factor in winning. it's when the good people start fighting back that matters
what you should say is people now are numb and this won't be forever
I believe Al-Walid deserve his own series. A very underrated general. Great video
Thanks.
Bitch please.
@@evilleader1991 Yeah you are wrong though
Those 100 battles included 1 on 1 duels
Tell me how he was outnumbered in those?
@@JasonDoe1000 that 1 on 1, that enemy's ego was equivalent to 1000 people...while Khalid has no ego if he had one why didn't he fight back against Umar ibn khatab when he removed him from being a commander and even after being removed he still help the other commander who succeeded him...do you know why he was removed because people are starting to idolize him because of him being undefeated instead of thinking its from God. With his popularity he can have a follower to revolt but he didn't.
hes a badass no doubt
"He also won against the allied sassinid byzantine army"
You say that so casually.. he defeated the combined forces, tactics, and technology of the two greatest empires at the time.
@DT nope, they actually didnt harm any innocent person as they were ordered.
He was a good commander. But the main reason he was able to defeat the Byzantine and Sassanids was because two great empires had spent the previous 30 years fighting each other over the Levant, and weakening their nations to the breaking point. Without the Byzantine-Persian wars Khalid's chances would have been much lower.
@@TonyTars the Arabs were outnumbered in all fights anyway, and they lost almost none, the result would've been the same in the end, it might just have taken longer. Keep in mind that he also isn't the only good general the Arabs had, they also had the better fighters winning all those duels.
Ofcourse, them being weakened helped, but I wouldn't say that it was the main reason.
@@abdmzn You bring up having better fighters in duels. How many of the best Persian and Byzantine fighters do you think had already died by the time they took on the Muslims?
In fact let's reverse the scenario: the Arabs fight for 30 years, then try to take on the fresh armies of Persia and Byzantine!
There is no way we can ignore the three decades of war and the effect they had on the Persian and Byzantine armies. It's simply not fair or logical.
The Persians even had a civil war for 3-4 years AFTER the 30 year war, right before taking on the Arabs! Despite all that, it took Arabs 20 years to occupy all of Persia. If it took 20 years for Persians to lose after decades of fighting the Byzantines and among themselves, I honestly don't think Arabs would have been able to defeat them under normal conditions.
@@TonyTars it only took 20 years because it was a large Empire and wasn't easy to occupy by the Arabs while fighting the Byzantines, after the events of this video, it was clean up basically.
And no, it really doesn't matter, the Arabs still had a massive disadvantage in numbers and technology, and they won against both Empires, losing close to no battles.
Logic: attack the Persian empire then when you subjugate it turn to the Byzantine empire.
Khalid Ibn Al-Walid: I don't have time for that, combine the two and meet me in the battlefield in 10 minutes :3
Yaaaaaaaaaa👍👍👍👍👍😆😆😆😆
Khalid ibn alwaleed be like:: hurry up you two big guys I have other missions to accomplish also
Hahahahaha
Man this was savage
Savage tho
According to Islamic sources, Ibn Waleed was so successful in his wars, so the soldiers under his command started to speculate that they win all the time because of their leader. Umar talked to Al Waleed and took all his commanding titles away from him, before the speculation damaged the soldiers religious belief against an unbeatable iconic figure. Al Waleed took the decision very politely and joined the army back again as a regular soldier.
That's true. Omar was always mindful to keep Muslims faithful, and to put God first.
ms wpwm The Islam as religion did not spread through sword the state or the Islamic empire did
When you read in history you will find out the we Muslims did not force anyone into the Islam. yeah we force Jezeia (the money that you pay for believing in religion other than Islam) but still we can consider it as taxes of some sort even the amount that they pay were not to expensive according to some historians. we Muslims pay more in zakah ( which is a charity that you have to give to the poor people after Ramadan in the first day of eid)
Of course I am talking about what usually happened after taking the land
before taking the land we give the three choices war, believing and jezeia
ms wpwm and about the terrorist those people are even condemned in Islam we are not making heros of them actually they were exist even back day in the Islamic golden age we call them the The Kharijites they believe that every sinner is non believer they have the same ideas of isis
And the made a lot of troubles for the Kalefa back then
ms wpwm well I cannot deny this these wars and battles are use to brainwash people to join to isis and the other terrorist groups
But c’mone anything can be used in good or in bad
these wars were huge success that they put its mark in the history and put the foundation of the Islamic culture
You can’t blame people for being proud of their ancestors look I know that war not a good thing but these wars were needed to establish the cultures back then
ms wpwm ok criticize Islam but don’t tell us to change our faith to fit your beliefs or your culture
From my prospective of view I think that religion should not be change otherwise it will lose its divinity and holiness
All those religions that you are mention did not get the same hate or the same attack that Islam get through the history so people when criticizing Islam criticize the fact that Islam is not accept liberalism our the western morals and that not fair
the enemy leader sent a message to al walid threatning him that he have to retreat as they outnumber him , he responded with a message says " i came to you with a people that love dying as much as your men love living "
high eagle this is against Roman Empire, in battle of Yarmouk.
metal as fuck lmao
@@khalduras784 lmao
That reminds me of the "are we the baddies?" video.
Where did you find that out?? What book?
when al waleed was on his bed dying he said "I have fought in a hundred battles and there is no inch in my body has ether a blow by sword or throw with arrow or stab with a spear and here Im dying on my bed " he said that because he want to die in battlefield like the other martyrs , May Allah have khaled ibn Al waleed in his paradise with his Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him
This Also proves for us Muslims, Allah Gives you Life and Death when he wishes. Otherwise the whole world can't kill you if He (Allah) don't want you to die. Thanks For commenting this.
Colonel Josef and when he was told why he never martyrs Bec he was given name Sword of God! And no sword of Allah can be broken by any man!
Because he was "Saifullah"
Sword of Allah.
Sword of Allah can't be broken. So nobody could kill him.
sir, ibn waleed was called as the sword of allah...so that if he dies in a battle, it will be said Allah's sword is broken... Allah wants him not to die in a battle
Allah won't allow His sword to break in a battle field. That Sword is special.
The Muslims conquered Persia within few years, something that the Roman were unable to do despite fighting for over 400 years.
@Jakeeyy1009
Seljuks haven't conquered all of Byzantinian empire, they just moved forward a little bit, the eastern part of Byzantinian empire was already a part of the Arabs, Haran, Al Ruha, were Anatolian cities that were a part of the Arab empires.
Caesar wouldve done it if they hadnt killed him
@Jakeeyy1009 arab didn't conquered whole of it but Muslims Turks did it
@Jakeeyy1009 yes, the eastern roman empire had suffered from a different invasions, it's hard to servive in such situations
@Jakeeyy1009 Do you know why the Sassanid Empire failed or where the Sassanid descendants are now? Do you know that before the Sassanid civil war, the kings of Eastern Rome had to respect the Sassanid kings and the Sassanid kings were called the king of kings? Do you know that the Sassanid army defeated the 300,000-strong Turkish army with only twelve thousand men? But why did they lose to the Arabs if the Arabs had already attacked the Sassanid rule but were easily repelled?
If there would be something like UA-cam Oscar, you would have got one!
That is a high praise, thank you very much! I watched a few of your videos - you are doing great! Best of luck!
Wouldn't mind it. :-)
Nope, even though Kings and Generals is pretty solid, the UA-cam Oscar goes to Historia Civilis, that dude makes you feel like watching a movie.
+Stormy Molnjavichen dude. :-)
+Zee Hans Oscar shaped, please. :-)
Just look at this.. each time the muslim faught. The enemy outnumbered them.. but it is not the number which wins in a battle.. it is the will power to fight until death
Jan Dom it is the power of fighting for a higher cause , to spread monotheism amongst people who were enslaved by their leaders and paganism..
@@elixir7400 If you can get people to fight in the name of God, they will fight till death.
Its not the numbers that prove their braun it's their tactics. So heck off.
Because they had jihad spirit in their Hearth back there not us who di gaming all day and watch stupid cartoon
@@elixir7400 the people they were fighting were not pagans, though. Most of them were either Christian, Jewish or Zoroastrian.
It's great that fans are suggesting battles from this era. I never expected anyone to chronicle these since the Rashidun caliphate is one of the most underrated of all conquering powers in history and Khalid bin Walid, easily the most underrated general of all time.
I hope you keep covering battles from this era and also do other ones on Khalid
I wouldn't call Khalid bin Walid underrated. In Europe perhaps, but ask anyone in the middle east who is the greatest general of all time, they will answer Khalid bin Walid. (or maybe Saladin)
He's not underrated, the empire he built is.
People are focused on Mohammed and Mohammed only, when the fact is without Khalid, probably Islam wouldn't be the second biggest religion today
Khalid Bin Al Waleed is the master of speed in the war.
Khalid's talent was only in war, the Prophet was excellent in many ways.
Sassanids: We have you 6 to 1
Khalid: I like those odds
Khalid did not lead in lost battle. He was in syria.
Mohammed ابن سليمان
Khalid born in Saudi Arabia
In Makkah
Sassanids: Alemko com you watch too much fake news
Khalid: He is a fool let him be we need these guys in Islam
Omar it was the arabian peninsula not saudi arabia as the hypocrites of Al saud wasn’t there
@@user-hl2xs3oc9m no it's Saudi Arabia 💚🙏
During this battle, the Arabs built elephant like statues and made their horses sleep near them at night in order to get used to fighting elephants. Arabian horses are smart they adapted and on the final day they did not panic around elephants and that helped the arabs gain an advantage.
Very interesting
Hannibal would be proud
Hm... I don't know if that is true. I read (second punic war) that horses run from elephants because of there smell. Yet, Hannibal's horses were used to them.
Arabs could not bring smell on theirs models of elephants.
@pharaonicvs I was talking just about elephant statues and sleeping horses near them.
I didn't know about dressing camels. But interesting :)
interesting note. could u provide me the source?
This tradition of single combat before battle is pretty fascinating, especially when it's between the highest commanders from both sides.
they were real men i imagine single combat with swords by trump the baboon vs kim
for real. just like when Achilles told Agamemnon, "imagine a king who fights his own battles, wouldn't that be a sight"
Khalid though didn't fight single combats as far as I know. I think he is too smart to do that.
read more brother Khaled always challenged the enemies commander in duels but they were too smart not to accept .. because rip to those who accepted.
Khaled was one of the very few who always fought dual blades and moved the horse with his legs .. the only mentioned warrior who did that as well in the Muslims was (Al-Zubair ibn Al-Awwam)
Radical Theories butthurt
"He also won against the allied sassinid byzantine army"
its like Zimbabwe to win a war vs USA & Russia
they would never admit the might of Islam. They would either brush it aside or invent a cock and bull story. Ignorance at its best.
@@alvirarahman1559 agrreed
😂 😂 😂 😂 👍 Bro
Criminology M.A. Muslims will rise again and rule the world
@Criminology M.A. but what happened when Al Waleed was fighting with your ancestors? Even 5 to 1 majority cannot defeat us **
This video makes Al Walid's continuous wins against so many armies in the first part so casual, but in an awesome way !
SaracenCount he was a genius! He won all battles with less than 20 000 men!
“Do not say that! How few are the Romans and how numerous are we ! 'An army's strength lies not in numbers of men but in Allah's help, and its weakness lies in being forsaken by Allah”
-- Khalid ibn al-Walid
Allahu'akbar
How few are we .. how many are the romans **
Sure you have your heroes we have ours.
Anyways what heroes do you guys have? Your ancestors were tyrant specially the rulers
Life With S. Christian armies rule this world in case you didn’t notice
"I know more about Khalid than anyone else, no man is luckier than he. No man is his equal in war. No people face Khalid in battle, be they strong or weak, but are defeated. Take my advice and make peace with him."
Prince Ukaid of Domat ul Jandal. (633 A.D)
هههههههههه i read about that to
he is blessed from god....
may he rest in peace
Absolutely right ....He is sword of Allah
Hmm
Ali bin Abi Talib better than khalid
ابن بلاد أورك al Muhajir bin Khalid bin alWaleed was in Ali’s army while his brother Abdulrahman bin Khalid bin alWalid was in Muawiya’s army
"We have 30 books left from Muslim Andulasia so that we could split an atom, if half of the 1 million burned books could survive we have already travelled between galaxies in space" - Pierre Curie
very well said! thank you Shaikh Azam
😂😂😂😂 joke
@@MM-qh9yh that's a fact jackass, not a joke
Wait, is this true?
@@MM-qh9yh truth hurt right ?
Another thing remained unmentioned..
Khalid ibn Walid fought more than 100 battles, but died UNDEFEATED.
@@medianempire8685
Where do you belong, rat?
@@mohaimenulimam233 Let him be bro
Wallahi he doesn't in any way touch the might of islam history nor any of my feelings. However I can clearly smell his rage because he has nothing to say watching this video. قل موتوا بغيظكم
@@nassimbenslimane
You are right..
@@medianempire8685 that's all you can do...
and how do you think that reduces value of islam or sacred scripture??
Anyway may God guide you to islam.
@@medianempire8685 come to Islam, worship only Allah and nobody else, he is your creator
What a gap between civilizations we have today, we westerners know and greet so many generals but I am sure that many of us haven't heard of this extremely good general Al-Walid.
We are tribalistic, no question about it.
Convict Con He was a man of great honor. He was nicknamed (the sword of Allah) by the prophet Mohamed. Never lost a battle before accepting Islam or after accepting it. An absolute beast...a warrior.
Maybe its because of Islamophobia that our news channels injecting in us. He was a great general never told to us.
Well it goes both ways. I wish we could have been taught more about the western civilization as well.
Khalid bin Al-walid better then millions
Some of the comments here... I think I will need therapy down the line, or maybe a beer, or 10. Donate to our personal beer/therapy fund - Patreon: www.patreon.com/KingsandGenerals or Paypal: paypal.me/kingsandgenerals :-)
like before watching. This is one of the best videos made ever.
Kings and Generals can you make a video about fall of yugoslavia pls
Looks like ur already expecting a religious comment war down there but the notion is appreciated...lovin hr channel by the way keep up the good work
If i sponsor ur video can u make a video of the Khmer empire
Ummm the cacus belli for the war was the financial backing for several revolts and uprisings that sassanids had funded and supported raiding tribes on the border of the two states and the byzantines had killed a muslim envoy and fought the muslims in raids and skirmishes
Arab sources say that Khaled bin Al-Waleed never lost a battle in his life, even when he was against the Muslims at the beginning of his life, this great man
@@sasaniansoldier7118 Do you want the Arabs to unite and beat your ass again?
@@sasaniansoldier7118 dont say this if you are living in Iran former Sasanid empire
@@sasaniansoldier7118 ah yes a keyboard warrior which is one of the lowest class of warrior throughout the history...rip man you could've been a better person but instead you chooses to be one of those pathethic people
Sasanian are history. Muslims are the present and we dominate.
@@sasaniansoldier7118 we kicked your sasanian ass before, wanna go again? Bitch
It boggles the mind. Khalid bin Waleed had like a 100% success rate. Most of the time the odds were not in his favor. Mind you, he was a general, one of the most difficult jobs in the world and to achieve a spotless record there may be the most impressive career of all time.
Well done video again! Thanks!
The tactics of Al-walid proved that he was a greatest genius military comander
IT S WAS VERY VERY INTELLEGENT
Al Walid was his father... call him Bin Walid (son of Walid)
How about Alexander The Great
"Victory comes only from Allah "
@@rinharter7758 absolutely
Duel with khalid they said
It will be fun they said
hahaha
Shapur the great what Israel has to do with Khalid? Killing a small child with a stone in his hand is not something special bro
Samer Nattifi The numbers were initially 29,667 Israel vs 13,000 Arab, but eventually turned into a maximum of 117,500 Israel vs 63,500 Arab.
@@Pt_Lacky let's not forget how soem Arabs govt supports pissrael
@Samer Nattifi where the resource, please add link
How they defeated the Byzantines and Sassanids at same time, is incredible
God with their said
Actually Islam born In Persia
Rashidun Caliph from Sasanid Empire
@@bourbon4707 😂😂😂
@@bourbon4707 Glory be to the one who made you weak so that you could relate the history of others to you
Arabs were nothing before Mohammed. They became absolute super power in 30 years. This is one of the greatest proofs for his prophecy.
@@runi5413 Even if that was true , in order to gather all these as you call "nomadic horse-cultured" and incredibly stubborn people while starting from scratch in a matter of 30 years , don't you think that is miraculous ?
@@runi5413 It's ok no offense taken .
It's true the conditions were similar , but you have to consider how Genghis Khan came to rule .
He killed a brother a close friend in order to rise up to power , allied himself with the Jin to take down the Tatar just to invade them later.
Genghis Khan's goals were materialistic , he fought for the spoils of war , Indeed he was a great military leader but with such materialistic ambitions meant that the greatest empire of his won't last and it did fall.
On the other hand Prophet Mohamed didn't start by killing anyone .
He only spread the word of God and sadly in return his followers were tortured and killed.
When he took shelter in madina they welcomed him as most of them converted to islam by their own choice .
And from there you can see a lot of battles started by the non-muslims which the muslims won , even though there was a huge difference in numbers (3:1 sometimes 4:1).
@@runi5413
The messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم establish peace sense he arrived at madinah with the 3 Jewish tribes
Bani al-Nader, Bani Qaenoqaa, and Bani Goraeda
the first two break their promise and try to kill him secretly so he command them to leave
The last one betrayed him in battle the prophet was surrounded by 10000 pagan Arabs around madinah and they did not manage to enter the city until the jews let them in and support the pagans with 5000 jews
In the end Allah supported his messenger with a cold strong wind that throw away the enemy camp and the jews were killed for what they did
يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ ٱذۡكُرُواْ نِعۡمَةَ ٱللَّهِ عَلَيۡكُمۡ إِذۡ جَآءَتۡكُمۡ جُنُودٌ فَأَرۡسَلۡنَا عَلَيۡہِمۡ رِيحًا وَجُنُودًا لَّمۡ تَرَوۡهَا ۚ وَڪَانَ ٱللَّهُ بِمَا تَعۡمَلُونَ بَصِيرًا
O you who have believed, remember the favor of Allah upon you when armies came to [attack] you and We sent upon them a wind and armies [of angels] you did not see. And ever is Allah, of what you do, Seeing.
إِذۡ جَآءُوكُم مِّن فَوۡقِكُمۡ وَمِنۡ أَسۡفَلَ مِنكُمۡ وَإِذۡ زَاغَتِ ٱلۡأَبۡصَـٰرُ وَبَلَغَتِ ٱلۡقُلُوبُ ٱلۡحَنَاجِرَ وَتَظُنُّونَ بِٱللَّهِ ٱلظُّنُونَا۟
[Remember] when they came at you from above you and from below you, and when eyes shifted [in fear], and hearts reached the throats and you assumed about Allah [various] assumptions.
هُنَالِكَ ٱبۡتُلِىَ ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنُونَ وَزُلۡزِلُواْ زِلۡزَالاً شَدِيدًا
There the believers were tested and shaken with a severe shaking.
وَأَنزَلَ ٱلَّذِينَ ظَـٰهَرُوهُم مِّنۡ أَهۡلِ ٱلۡكِتَـٰبِ مِن صَيَاصِيهِمۡ وَقَذَفَ فِى قُلُوبِهِمُ ٱلرُّعۡبَ فَرِيقًا تَقۡتُلُونَ وَتَأۡسِرُونَ فَرِيقًا
And He brought down those who supported them among the People of the Scripture from their fortresses and cast terror into their hearts [so that] a party you killed, and you took captive a party.
Al Quran 33 9
The end of mongols that they embrace Islam and follow our faith
@I NSA Where did you get the idea that Persia did not give the world anything,,no scientists ,, no books ,, no universities ..etc Actually, there was an “Iranian Golden Age” before the “Islamic Golden Age”, and the latter was actually a continuation of the former.
Ibn Nadim mentions a long list of pre-Islamic Pahlavi books which were still available in the 4th century A.H. in Baghdad. Have a look at that list (Al-Fihrist). Biruni also has mentioned a number of pre-Islamic books in his works, particularly in The Remaining Signs of Past Centuries - Wikipedia.
The works of Islamic scholars directly reference literature on various scientific, mathematical, philosophical, and theological disciplines from pre-Islamic Iran.
Biruni mentioned another story which shows there was a scientific tradition in Ancient Persia:
When Qutaibah bin Muslim under the command of Al-Hajjaj bin Yousef was sent to Khwarazmia with a military expedition and conquered it for the second time, he swiftly killed whomever wrote the Khwarazmian native language that knew of the Khwarazmian history, science and culture. He then killed all their Zoroastrian priests and burned and wasted their books, until gradually the illiterate only remained, who knew nothing of writing and hence their history was mostly forgotten.
So, there were books and libraries in Khwarazm (likely in Khwarazmian language) when Arabs invaded Iran.
However, in the early centuries of Islam, many Pahlavi books were translated into Arabic (the “current” language of science), and there was no need for those works anymore (so nobody cared to copy those books and they were lost). This way, at least the content of some of those books were preserved to some extent. Unfortunately, many of the translated works were destroyed during the Mongol invasion.
Also, read about Gundeshapur university in pre-islamic time in Persia- Wikipedia
And men were men, they knew the right way to conduct gender roles. Unlike pussies among Persians and Byzantinians.
You missed a MAJOR point, Elephants didn't ran back and drowned themselves in river for no reason, Saad(R.A) sent forward his camels wearing black curtains and sheets on them with heavy roaming voices, which obviously panicked elephants.
When I see otoman battles, I cry... the heart of christianism a so beauty, avanced technologically land like Bizance destroyed by a cult of a pedophile of desert😭😭
@@luanlopes9415 And that insult was really unnecessary, muslims in general were never known to be pedophiles, you shouldn't talk that way about the people. And the ottomans were mostly not arab people coming from the desert, they were mixed people with a variety of ethnicities and origins (Arminians, Slavs, Kurds, Turcs...etc)
He ordered his men to hit the nose of the elephant because that’s a special point so they ran back and killed their own ppl
Both religions are non sense in fact all religions are made up to control amd divide !
@@danielperez232 you are repeating a statement you heard from an atheist who heard from another atheist and form another. Rationalise by yourself and being atheist doesn't always mean you are right because of science. Science is constantly changing its not fixed how can you believe in something that changes regular
This was the one two punch that pushed the Early Islamic conquest unto the world stage. A massive blow to the Byzantine at Yarmouk and this battle gave the offensive initiative to the Arabs. In the course of the next 100 years the Caliphate would spread from Al Andalus in Spain to the Indus River valley - nicely done!
Indeed. We plan to cover the movement to the East. Let's see how it works. :-)
The death of the last Sassanid emperor was particularly moving.
one of the decedent of the Persian emperors ended up one of the founding father of Pakistan. Liaquat Ali Khan
Flash Point History, bro can u plz show me roman or western sources of this battle
Affan Ahsan
Byzantine almost don't have a record about the battle. About Persian, I don't know. Maybe they don't want to write it because they lose? Who knows? Only God who knows the answer.
What absolutely amazes me the contempt, the hate of Hazrat Khalid ibn al Walid RA towards cowardice.
Even his last words were:
"May the eyes of coward never sleep."
Six more Sassanid armies were sent against him and Al-Walid be like: "Come at me bro"!
I like those odds
come to papa
@Jojo Momo for chicken just say Bismillah
@Jojo Momo yeah, i just want to remind you about hadith Prophet Muhammad Saw. That if you eat halal food from non-muslim (which is not slaughtered by Allah's name) before you eat say Bismillah.
@Jojo Momo
I step on Qur'an and Islam
Got to admit that Khalid Ibn Walid was undoubtedly the toughest warrior throughout history. He led more than 100 bloody battle, less equipped, the enemies are always outnumbered, yet never lost a single war !! WOW just unbelievable !!
To add to above fought numerous 1 on 1 battles on almost all of the battles , Omar Razi Ullah tallah unhu rightly said "let the women grieve over khalid as no mother will give birth to another khalid al walid" Subhan ALLAH , Razi ALLAH Anhum Wa Razi Unhu
100 battles?
That is probably counting skirmishes as battles
@@artinrahideh1229 They were not skirmishes, but most of them were against armies of more than 10,000
@@زيدأكدي could you send a list of these battles?
@@artinrahideh1229 ا It's too many, but I'll give you some
Both defining battles against the Byzantines (Battle of Yarmuk), and the Sassanids (Battle of Al Qadissiyah) occurred on the same year. Most of the same army was also used in Al Qadissiyah in Novemeber of 636.
Here's a short timeline on the major events 3 years before and after 636 AD:
633: Campaigns in Bahrain, Oman, Yemen, and Hadramaut. Raids in Iraq.Battle of Chains, Battle of Saniyy, Battle of Walaja, Battle of Ullais, Battle of Hira, Battle of Al-Anbar, Battle of Ayn al-Tamr, Battle of Dawmat al-Jandal, Battle of Firaz.
634: 22 August- Death of Abu Bakr, the first caliph of Islam. Umar ibn al-Khattab assumes power as the second caliph.
634: Battle of Bosra, Battle of Damascus, Battle of Ajnadin. Death of Abu Bakr. Battle of Namaraq, Battle of Saqatia.
635: Battle of Bridge, Battle of Buwaib, Conquest of Damascus, Battle of Fahl.
636: Battle of Yarmuk, Battle of al-Qādisiyyah, Conquest of Madain.
637: Conquest of Syria, Conquest of Jerusalem, Battle of Jalula.
638: Conquest of Jazirah (Mesopotamia)
639: Conquest of Khuzistan (Persia). Advance into Egypt. Plague of Emmaus.
Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_7th-century_Muslim_history
Yep, that is a good timeline showing the key events.
Wikipedia is never a reliable source
@Dante Are you doubting the dates? Kindly elaborate.
It has nothing to do with "Muhammadan", "Francescan" or "Daoist" legends. It's a documented historic battle that is studied by all history majors in all reputable universities and even military academies.
"The legacy of the Battle of Yarmuk was both far reaching and profound. First, and most immediately, the defeat at Yarmuk led to the permanent loss of the entire Byzantine East (Syria, Palestine, Mesopotamia, and Egypt), which seriously undermined the Byzantine Empire’s fiscal and military capabilities."
Source: historycooperative.org/heraclius-and-the-early-islamic-conquests-an-analysis-of-byzantine-military-failure-at-the-battle-of-yarmuk-in-ad-636/
www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA494014
P.69-73
General Khalid ibn al Walid is truly great..love from india
What the heck !!!! He khalid ibn al waleed RA..mopped every army that came in his way...this is something unbelieveable..😇😇😇😇😇
OSKESIS .....beleive it its not story
That explains why Persians hate omar, it's because he destroyed the sassani Persians.
jake roberts exactly
Persians hate Arabs in general. Not because of conquering Sassanids, but because of forcing Islam into Iranian population.
So why do not you leave Islam now
Iran today is an independent country and the Arabs have no authority to prevent you from leaving Islam
Iranian version of Islam is watered down and mixed considerably with Zoroastrian traditions. Iranians are now using shia Islam to control and manipulate the Arab population to our advantage. Iran is supporting shias in Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, etc. to gain more influence. Islam in Iran is dead. It's just a political tool to influence/control others.
But what we see in Iran is different
We see the clergy dominating the country
Islamic law is strictly enforced in Iran
The atheists are punished
The generals went at it one on one? Now that’s some old school badassery there
Yep, the Sassanid tradition demanded it.
the last badass in military history was G.S.Patton he wanted to fight Rommell tank to tank !!
Kings and Generals lool it's an Arab tradition. Checkout Arab pre-Islamic history if you want to learn more about yhe signficant of these pre battle duels... Also a good pre-Islamic Arab Sassinid Battle is Thi Qar.
Kings and Generals True,the sassanid challenge al waled and he accept it.
;
The icons used for leader names is the most beautiful arabic calligraphy I've ever seen, well done!
to all muslims here praising muslim's victory ..
there is only one reason Allah gave them victory against these mighty empires ..
it was there righteous deeds and justice ..
human b eing
No, Arab warriors were ruthless, intelligent and tactical ,especially Khalid ,Islam only united them ,but Christian kingdoms in Europe were also united by religion ,this doesn't mean that Christianity is a true religion
@@sm1sm2sm3 if arabs were so strong why in the battle of alzab the persians destroyed them and ended the ummayed cilaphate
Christopher Carter He’s right. We only won, because of how righteous we were. We became divided when we lost our deen, and now the western forces take advantage of that, and even have documents that say Muslims should never be united. But In Shaa Allah we will be back. It’s been prophesied.
Christopher Carter As Muslims we believe Allah allows who He (SWT) wills to win. Muslims win, and lose. Heck we’ve been loosing a lot since ancient times has passed. When we lose our way. We lose. When we are on the right path we win. I’m just going by what my deen teaches us. There’s a reason for everything. We Muslims needed to lose badly to come back stronger In Shaa Allah
@@alimoradi8454
That's bcs the ummayads caliphs were on each other's throats
And then the abbasids ended their rains but it was Arabs not Persians Persians came later
Khalid ibn al-Walid(RA) Quotes:
- "When Allah decides a matter, it is done."
- "I have dedicated my life to the way of Allah, Most High."
- "Man intends one thing, but Allah intends another."
- "The earth destroys its fools, but the intelligent destroy the earth."
- "If you are truthful you will survive. If you lie you shall perish."
- "When I am in the battlefield, I love it more then when I am in my house."
- "The rainy night when I am standing wearing armor with sword and shield in my hand and looking again and again towards the eastern horizon, waiting for sun to rise so that I could start the battle."
One quote I like abt him
" فلا نامت اعين الجبناء"
"The way of Allah"
Committing warfare against unbelievers. That is the Islamic way.
"i came to you with people who love death as much as you love life" Khalid to a Sassanid commander
@@lennydale92 why can't you enjoy history, discuss it and learn from it while respecting everybody else who came for the matter? Warfare is a part is a part of every nation history whatever its causes were. Thus we should discuss it sophisticatedly instead of using it to unnecessarly cause strife and hate
@@chediamor3607
I would enjoy it if it wasn't for fanatical Muslims claiming it's a victory for their ideology. The same Muslims who will pretend it's a religion of peace.
Yesss, finally the legendary battle of Qadissiya, thanks so much Kings and Generals!
No problem sir.
M F
Are you Indian?
M F get rekt
Do you know that battles of AL-Qadsiyaah and Yarmouk took place in two months of that time period.
Muslims used to be great war tacticians. If you read their history, you will find out that in many cases while outnumbered by the opposition still they managed through war tactics, high morale and incredible leadership to eventually win.
Khalid bin Walid (ra) , the Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) named hım "the sword of Allah" and now you know why
@abcde fghij and American dick
@@ЯковН-ю9х /u mean your mom ass
Wow the sassinids had such massive armies.
But they were all crushed.
Amazing.
@@aydnmesuttorun8397 keep dreaming
Pleas Do videos on :
Battel of Badr
Battel of Khaybar
Battel of Uhud
Battel of Trench
Battel of Mu'tah
Battel of Tabok
I would be great and everyone will be shocked😅
Sam Supari You can watch those battles on Islamic Guidance and Merciful Servant.
i doubt they could be portrayed perfectly especially Badr, and to lesser account Tabook. by taking method of modern revisionism history discipline.
too much miracles flown on all reliable accounts of Hadith oral sources
only Allah almighty knows.
even i used to be involved in Wikipedia Battle of Mu'tah revisions & editings we have faced tough problems to meet the requirement of modern encyclopedic standard. too many disagreements between editors. which in the end we published the last conservative version. and whenever i looked again very much did not satisfy as too many critical firsthand sources information we decided to butcher many parts of it. hope you understand if i disagree with this idea
May Allah bless you
I step on Islam and Quran
@@medianempire8685 I step on your head
Takbeer.... Allaho Akbar
By the way "Khalid" in Arabic literally means "Immortal"!
خالد
Not literally
@@LeeTheKnight yes really 🙃!!!
@@LeeTheKnight Yes it does. Literally.
Literally it means "eternal"but immortal is a synonym of that.
seems fitting on him , he lives in our hearts
SO AWESOME
Thank you, my friend!
that dude literally pulled a Hannibal with the crescent thing, that was fucking genious
+Kings and Generals ain jalut pless
NightFury_BR btw,he did the same trick against the Muslims and won.never lost a battle.he accepted Islam later.
Fact : Khalid ibn Al walid did't lose a single battle in his life time
radhiallahu anhu
you and your khalid ibn walid suck it bitchs
despite being repeatedly heavily outnumbered and poorly equipped. and despite that he was surrounded by the two "super powers" of the age
Yes,but he did regret one thing, that he cannot die on the battlefield as a martyr, instead he died of old age.
mohd tibroni Azhar he died of disease. but Allah swt still might count him as a shaheed inshaAllah , because he sincerely tried to achieve it
Khalid bin waleed رضي الله عنه the sword of Allah ❤️❤️🇸🇦🇹🇷
Fuck omar
@@ukraine-russiawar126 but hurt Persian rafidi here 😆😆😆
@@ukraine-russiawar126 رافضي 😒
it's rare to see these two flags together nowadays ☹.
politics is the Devil tool
"Allahum join our hearts, mend our social relationship, guide us to the path of peace, bring us from darkness to light, save us from obscenities, outward or inward, and bless our ears, our eyes, our hearts, our spouse, our children, and relent toward us; Thou art the Relenting, the Merciful. And make us grateful for Thy blessing and make us praise it while accepting it and give it to us in full"
greeting from Saudi Arabia.
@@ukraine-russiawar126 اینجا چیکار میکني عجم😂
Every campain of Khalid ibn Al-Walid deserve a documentary. From Uhud to Mutah to Yarmuk to Wallaja to Firaz to Iron Bridge. A true military genious. According to your policy you are making most of the decesive ones. Thanks for covering others too. I think "Sword of Allah" by A I Akram will be Helpful.
Ailee Georsua Ugh, another person who hates Islam, I get it now shoo, shoo!
Edin743, Al-Walid was a psychopathic murder!
Lion King ha you clearly haven't read anything about him.
dude t, Please check "Tabari" history book!
Lion King he wasn't a murdering psychopath he didn't kill people without a reason
If you lead 40k men against 20k enemies, why tf would you agree to a personal duel?
Frederick the Great its a matter of pride
Honor
Nope. I was already like, stop dueling!
If you lead a significantly stronger army, personal duel is about the worst thing you can do, in terms of tactics. Pride, honour? The commander was supposed to lead his me and win the battle, this way he got killled, caused demoralization of his army and potentially caused fall of the two of the most ancient empires - the Persian and the Roman. But I guess at least he preserved his honour...
+nimmivids Yes, but only if you have the smaller army. When your army is twice the size of the enemy, its most likely better odds to just use your superior strenght to win the battle.
How an emerging civilization like that challenges and wins over the two superpowers of the time fighting both at the same time is just insane.
Alexander Christopher here’s the thing though, when they were the Arabs, they were weak, divided, hated each other, and killed each other,
They never formed a country or any sort of United state,
This victory was for the Muslims not the Arabs!
Just look at what Arab nationalism has done to Arabs today, back to being weak and divided and hating each other.
And I say that as an Arab myself.
@@AM-bj7yo I'm not arab but I do hope someday that all the arabs will unite and love each other. There's nothing impossible to ALLAH. And when that happens, the turks and all other Muslim nation will join the unity. ALLAHUMMA ameen.
Commentsurfer your a turk?
@@HSQtr no I'm not.
@Imposing Patriot oh that's a load of crap . You cant even prove that these are all true.
Khalid Ibn Al-Walid was truly a legendary commander, probably the mightiest in history.
He earned his title: "The sword of God"
@Belmin Hodzic Shut up, you know why allah's sword because it was bloody like allah
@Belmin Hodzic Do not be a bitch, I hate Islam, I am Iranian, you know a Shapur from all Iranian names, idiot, I do not like the name of Amir, we Iranians are not Muslims and we do not like Islam, why do you support bloody Islam?
@Belmin Hodzic I must say that our ruler is apparently a Shiite and the people do not like Islam. If you do not know Shiite is Zoroastrian because we Iranians made it Iranian, we added Zoroastrian and Iranian customs and laws to it. I hate Islam because it is because they destroyed books and cities and killed people. I hope you have a good day too
@Belmin Hodzic where are you from
@Belmin Hodzic I do not understand what you mean
Man Khalid ibn Walid is a legendary general and warrior, he went on a campaign against not only one but two mighty empires with an army which has standard equipment, no reinforcements and low supply lines. He was facing armies which were far more superior in both numbers and equipment. He defeated ALL facing armies with just 1 army. He is just unbelievable.
Those people who are saying that muslims defeated the Sassanids and the Byzantines cause they got weak fighting among themselves should know that after the death of Prophet Muhammad there was a huge rebellion in which thousands muslims died and the muslims were fighting both the Sassanids and Byzantine at the same time.... both superpowers were superior in numbers and had modern weapons of their time as compared to Arabs...
Yeah, I know, what the hell? How did they win?
Niko Ništa God's help
Allah help them to win ? dengan doa
They won because of the high moral witch comes from true believe in their faith and they have a great leader who is both smart and brave he start the fight and ask for a dull at day one to kill the moral of his enemy what a great leader he never lost a battle even when he battled Muslims before he convert on ohud battle
The Arabian peninsula is isolated and manageable and these two massive empires are so busy with unending war they lose 50,000 troops to 20,000 army, that's how. Civil War doesn't matter, it's a desert and it's pretty easy to learn where the people are when you live in an inhospitable place such as the dunes.
I cry tears when I hear their stories and the efforts they made to make Islam strong and spread the word of Allah in the lands. may Allah grants them the highest place in heaven.
For those who wonder how enormous armies get defeated by much fewer ones, here is the answer:
Allah says in Surat anafal "in the context of war (the battle of Badr, 300 vs 1000)" verses(65,66)
[[O Prophet, urge the believers to battle. If there are among you twenty [who are] steadfast, they will overcome two hundred. And if there are among you one hundred [who are] steadfast, they will overcome a thousand of those who have disbelieved because they are a people who do not understand.## Now, Allah has lightened [the hardship] for you, and He knows that among you is weakness. So if there are from you one hundred [who are] steadfast, they will overcome two hundred. And if there are among you a thousand, they will overcome two thousand by permission of Allah . And Allah is with the steadfast]]
When you believe, then you have nothing to lose. Allah says in Surat Tawba verses 51,52 :
[[Say, "Never will we be struck except by what Allah has decreed for us; He is our protector." And upon Allah let the believers rely.##Say, "Do you await for us except one of the two best things while we await for you that Allah will afflict you with punishment from Himself or at our hands? So wait; indeed we, along with you, are waiting."]]
The two best things? Victory or Heavens (after death).
The stronger can keep his faith not endangered, therefore not changed. Remember this.
Elu iblis
U guys say God bless him cause he spread Islam and then say islam was not spreaded by sword....
The sword came after 3 options.. learn about it
What a tyrannical genocidal propaganda in garb of religion
this is when faith defeats numbers
true
True
Nay this is when brilliant strategies of Khalib ib Al walid met the roman and sassanids
Exactly
i think mainly the ingenuity of kahild bin walid.
If it were strictly due to faith muslims wouldnt have lost in battle of Uhud, when muhammed himself was leading the army. They were against khalid bin walid, his strategies won his wars even when he was a belligerent to muslims.
Facing a muslim army..worst case scenario.Khalid Bin Waleed (RA) in command and calling u out for a duel
every day you prove that you deserve my admiration of your historic channel you deserve to be on the top if you are not on the to already now by your awesome videos
Thanks!
One of the most famous battles of the era of the early Arab conquests. You did it perfectly, K&G. I tell you as an expert on the history of the Arabs
Thank you :)
ENERGY do you just know how many things ancient nations in general did can be considered crimes against humanity using modern logic?
Basically their very existance was a crime against humanity
Where are your sources for what you claim
ENERGY these Arab army were more merciful then others as they didn't execute every disbeliever of the city
Which false historical event are you following
The early Muslim Arab warriors used short swords that hang from a baldric in the Roman Byzantine Style, they also used spears that were were longer than their enemies.
Straight swords were used by early Arab armies even the Islamic Kingdom of Al Andalus in Spain had straight swords., Curved swords became popular when the Seljuk Turks introduced them in the Middle East during the 12th century
When I read history and see how the Arabs suddenly turned from scattered tribes into a superpower that defeated all the kingdoms and empires of the earth, I realize that Muhammad was a great prophet f and really had the help of God
Of course. There's no other explainetation
Help, not power
your so-called jackass prophet could've also been a schizophrenic child sex abuser
Does that mean that God likes bloodshed? If not, then the death of many thousands was a "necessary sacrifice"? Then why did he not help to subjugate and convert the whole world to the "true faith".
@@dominikkacprzak
If you read history, you'll know that Muslims treated people humanely, unlike the Armanian and Persian Empire.
That's why many people have entered Islam, and those who do not convert to Islam prefer to be ruled by Muslims.
10:23 you can make a full movie on the bravery of the muslim cavalry that marched on an entire army with no backup or reserve to kill rostam , AND made it back .
Hell no
@ i don't care what you think , i've never seen a division of a couple hundred men making a full frontal attack on a full army on it's own with no tactical advantage what so ever breaking through their ranks killing their leader . that's not tactics , just pure bad-ass courage .
Agreed. GOOSEBUMPS
This was an extremely underrated part of the video.
@
Shut up
how can you not love Al Walid ..
SOULREAVER you should either call him Khalid or ibn Waleed, but not Al Waleed because that was his father’s name.
if you are shia
If you are Iranian
Well, the past is past, we have a lot of influence in Syria and Iraq and Yaman now
I love him as an awesome warrior and general who lived and fought with honor, but I hate him for the cause he was fighting for and how this cause would grow so big and monstrous, directly because of his successes. Truly a conflicted feeling.
Now I know why Muslim shiat in Iran hates Omar ibn alkatab
Exactly.
Actually , Shiat hate him because he took the power from Ali ... Ali was the one who advise him ton just send 1/3 of troops from levant to reinforce army in Qaddasiye ....
Well I'm also Iranian so don't use your nationality as excuse to hate since, Shia had always problems with other Muslim, they basically hate all prophet companions, his wives, and Khalifa
Plus early Iranian were all sunni and they had no hatred toward omar or others, you can see it in all famous poetry, God bless you:)
well , you don't see shia as muslims ( and that why you just see kiliing them is key for going to heaven ) so don't talk in shoes of iranian majority ... idiot ...
Hopefully hate on both sides will disappear. Iranians were the backbone of Islamic golden age and have a great civilization, sassan is just a dynasty that disappeared but Iranians remained
Khaled bin Al-Waleed never lost a battle in his life, even when he was against the Arabs Muslims at the beginning of his life, this great man
Pan-Iranist [Iranian Ultra Nationalist]
He smacked your empire to the ground man 😂😂 if he was horrible what does that make you ? Nonsense 😅
Lost mu’tah
@@maddmaddox1648 No he did'nt Khalid was not highest commander in mutah there were three commanders in that army Prophet Muhammad ordered muslims to to choose on of them if anyone fell but three of the commander lost thier lives fighting so muslims give command to Khalid Ibn Walid he ralied the forces and ordered a organized retreat to save muslims
At the beginin you mentioned the Muslim general Khalid ibn elwalid. He was a genius military commander. Although his armies were always outnumbered , he NEVER lost a battle . He fought and won over 100 battles.
Claystead Rashidun* Abbasid were in the end of the 8th century and the beginning of the 9th century
Claystead, but bro is there Abbasid source about this battle??
Plz tell
This guy is unstoppable...al Walid move fast as wild fire
It is amazing how Muslims won against two empires and at the same time
well these 2 empires were getting constantly attacked on multiple fronts, had plague and more economic problems coming from the fact that they were pretty old and never than less they were fighting eachothers since centuries, muslim surely did an amazing campaign but the empires were surely not at their peak
Sources certainly exagerated a lot the gap between the two forces.
Ask any real educated human being, Islam copied christianism. And christianism (like Islam) copied other religions or changed to adjust in other religions to gain poppularity.
And you can't prove that any god exists. Before comment again, tell him to meet me and then tell him to delete my comment :P
Also Christians teach in their colleges (theological colleges) that god doesn't exists and religions exist only to help people mentaly and help the poor. Thats why Christians are at the top of this planet and muslims beg to enter those countries.
ps My comment is still here, your god can't even find a free wifi :P
So Christians wrote a fairytale and Islam based on it and "correct it". Islam copied Christianity AND changed/added some things so the same power of the pope/patriarchs etc could go to their imams and leaders. Thats why there are a lot of versions of every religion and especially thats why you will find orders in quran and bible that suits the needs of the leaders and not the humanity in general.
I doesn't make sense? Quran accept jesus and other figures like older prophets as a vary important figures and messegeres of god, but at the same time they don't agree with them.. Like jesus was a very elect and highly esteemed messenger of God but all his students, so jesus too was a troll spreading lies. What a serious religion!
ps Your god still sleeping? Where is he? Are you going to prove that god exist or not? I mean its not that hard to prove that god exists, if he trully exist! I suppose he doesn't need a lift to come here! haha
@@giangargo669 ah yes the Sassanid Empire had been so weakened that it could send only 10 armies against Khalid.
Defeating two empires at the same time is not an easy thing. It requires courage, valor, strength and victory from God.
It's also because of the dangerous ideology of Mohammed that promised Arabs wealth and women in both lives. If you die, you'll be in heaven with huris and if you manage to defeat the Romans and Persians, you'll be able to plunder their wealth and rape their women and take them in to slavery!
@@soniahemmati2372 The coward, if you give him the money of the whole earth, will not fight bravely. That's why you have to recognize the superiority of the Arabs.... Before Islam the Arabs fought with the Persians in the battle of Dhi Qar and the Arabs won
Both iran and roma were in a century of war, here you go thats why.
@@Iranshahrwarrior Cope you lost
@@jackal25301 nope i can't bro, we won't rest until iran is back in the game
May ALLAH Grant this legend Khalid ibn Waleed (Saifullah) Jannatul Ferdaus 🤗
For killing 1 million Persians sure he will be in heavens for devil
@POWERFULL ENERGY *هل تتذكرني*
@Yusuf patel Persian Empire population was 3.5 million at that time and his army killed around 1 million people that's not my figures Iranian historians and Zoroastrian records says that.....Persian were civilised while Arabs were nomads and nomads were on killing spree like Mongols
سيف الله المسلول ❤
@Dingo Pelt yeah bcz it needs 100 years to butcher people raping women forcefull marriages ...jaziya taxes on non believers yeah it needs that much time ...
Here are the reasons the muslims won
1 they had great generals other than khalid like Amr bin as and abu ubaidah bin jarrah
2 Arabs were used to harsh climate and had a very nutritious
diet
3 they were much more motivated as they believed that their death would grant them paradise the byzantines were not that much motivated unlike them
4 The army was disciplined and would not take bribes and was united unlike the others
5 God was with them
Actually its only 1 reason, as you mentioned "Allah was with them"
@@ahmadmuharam2088 yes that was probably 90% of it but also they did not massacre the population and promised freedom of religion allowing them to easily conquer cities
@ITS FACTZ mehmed was overall the best sultan but the problem was that all the sultans after sulieman were more concerned with their harem then they were in making the empire powerful
@ITS FACTZ they were spending their time with women and luxury that is why shah abbas defeated the ottomons several times
@ITS FACTZ mehmed was not concerned with women he wanted to conquer Constantinople which he did
For me I cinsider Khalid ibn alwalid as the greatest leader ever! even when he was against islam in battle of auhd mountain when he led the cavarly he was very clever!
He won against Muslims just because Muslims did not fulfill the command of the greatest General Muhammad Pbuh .... If the group which was assigned on a mountain was not left by Muslims then Khalid Ibn Waleed R.A had no chance ..But it was PLan of ALLAH SWT that the same man became Muslim and became a one of the great general of Islam ... The beauty of Islam is that enemy became the protector of this religion in future like Mongols who were enemy but later the same Mongols accepted Islam
ever? idon't know about that but he was awesome
@@rajababy2009 and Khalid was present in baddar if you don't Know against Muslim he lost once and uhud was almost done if companions didn't leave the mountain but it was about to happen
Khalid Ibn al Walid was the best General in the world at his time
And in history too
The effect of his achievements still existed until today ! Every inch he liberate and conquer still in the hands of Muslims for 14500 years ..
He a student of the messenger of Allah Mohamad , and Khalid is the sword of Allah
All praises to Allah! My Muslim brothers fought, sacrificed and worked like crazy to win that battle. Alhamdoulilah
where are you from?
And arabs done at be Suudi AMERİCA
@@cenanmehmetSaudi is not all arabs btw.
You certainly deserve more subscriber!
Thank you!
Khalid Bin Al-Walid didn't die in a battle he died because of a sickness. When he died he said " I got into a lot of battles in my life and there is no place on my body that does not have a scar from a sword or a spear or an arrow and here i am dying like a camel, cowards eyes do not sleep".
showing that he wanted to die in a battle instead of a normal death, that what makes him a great leader and general who never lost a battle.
Also in the beginning of Islam when he was not a Muslim he won a battle against muslims in the auhud battle.
Stop giving religios figures or gods the credit that should be given to the fucking man and his troops
@@immortal6453 that 'general' and his 'king' you're speaking of gave all their credit to God aswell, maybe learn from history instead of seeing the world through your atheistic shitstained eyes...
@@immortal6453 no power, no wins, no losses accept the will of Almighty God (Allah). HE supports the true believers and HE casts fear in the heart of the enemies. When muslims become pure in their beliefs and actions, they will be victorious again. The days are coming soon. Even Jesus (PBUH) will join us…
@@immortal6453 just that these guys wouldn't be fighting successfully without using Islamic meditations, chants and the Quranic guidelines. Arabs existed being trampled by the enemies but when Islam came by the Quran it was the opposite so yes credit goes to Islamic books and God
This itself enough to one islam.The way Army fought without rest and won can almost no army can do... Subhanallah
After these consecutive battles lost to muslims by Sassanid, two largest empire Sassanid and Byzantine of that time allied together and attacked the muslim forces by forgetting their 621 years of rivalry only to lose again....haha
imagine you lost to a very poor nation and almost all of its territory was desert, it must be very embarrassing af lol
@@Unknown-xp2gw they didn't even know how to make propre armor lol, they'll call you gay if you wear armor while dueling
@@pogchamp2897 ههههههههههههه that's very funny its fact that they were lite armoured (unlike the Persians )they don't like to work they like to trade there homeland is desert its pointless
All ther pre-Islamic history is about trade kingdom's
Sher A Bangla
الحمدلله
İt was islaaaaaaaaaaaaaam😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍i am an Arab Muslim proudly
for as long as i know, khalid bin walid almost spend his entire life on the battlefield or fighting, so no wonder he's already become great general + great warrior....and he muster his troops with best veteran....
but the fun fact is, lot of people (maybe after watch this video or read a book about this), asking why caliph umar didnt appoint khaled bin al-waleed to command the big army who will march to sasanid again.....
the answer is.....khaled bin al-waleed already won too many battle and caliph umar afraid that people will start to worship khaled as some kind of demigod....
I really love this video, please keep posting :D
andika baskoro Khalid ibn Walid was a rapist unfortunately.
DjeieA KeksekI how
DjeieA KeksekI he wasn’t lmfao,if anyone raped it would be the Persian generals not someone who followed the Muslim code of war like Khalid ibn al waleed.
Its Lenin lots of butt hurt Iranians hate him for some reason,so they make shit up,if you find more of them just ask for their sources and they won’t give you anything.
@@djeieakekseki2058 you witnessed that? 💀
No Wonder Khalid ibn AL- Walid was nicknamed "The sword of Allah"
+Sidahmed El Guebli
wrong ... this didn't happen
he is named since he was the greatest general and a great worrier and after he converted to Islam he gave him the title
and from history we know that he didn't lose a war and he is one of the main reasons how Islam spread among the regions that previously controlled by the Sassanids or the Romans (that's why he is the sword of Allah)
Yes, you are right. I got my knowledge from a false video. May Allah forgive me. I just read that prophet Muhammad gave him the title ''Saifullah''
Edit: I deleted the comment for confusion.
it's ok my brother
we all humans and make mistakes
have a nice day
He is not my dick, son.
Kudos to this channel. We learned about Khalid Ibn Al Waleed from our school history book but there many people around the world who never knew about this great Commander who was also a companion of our beloved Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).
bro in this battle commander was saad bin abi waqas
Will you cover ancient chinese warfare tactics in the future? Seeing that the next total war historical era is set in china and after some readings i start to wonder about what an "eight gates formation" looks like or how sun tzu's art of war actually applied on a battlefield as interpreted by the generals who read them
Yes, we are planning to! :-)
Everyone is using sun tzu's art of war, every general with a bit of common sense used it. It is the most basic thing about warfare. Nothing fancy realy.
The book is mostly about logistics & the grand strategy outside of the battlefield, how to fight a war. It is a mistake to think its about how to fight battles. War is so much more than just shove men on to a field. And joe martin is a bit correct, every half-decent general should know the jist of that in their sleep.
Ahahah i see, all the more reason for a video to educate us more about this! Also i found another art of war written by sun bin with all these 10 formations: square formation, circle formation, spike formation, goose formation,hook formation, loose formation, numbered formation, fire formation, water formation, Xuanxiang formation...
Again i've only read it in some internet forums and really wish a channel like this could help me visualize how it actually looks like (which is already granted thankfully :p)
iqbal sahibil *flashbacks of triggered snowflakes on the announcement of Total War: Three Kingdoms and not Rome XVII or Medieval 23rd intensifying*
wow, I'm a jew whos not only impressed but my mind is taking over, I have always studied Islamic history but noting of this comes, especially not in Europe, Walid was a warrior in my eyes a warrior that made alexander goes back to his graves, at alexander the greats time, it was an another demographic, another army that did not have the power nor the weapons to stand against his army, but under walids time, his army did not have any good equipment to stand against the foe, you can easily see the levels they were in
you can be proud of your semitic compatriot
True That. There's nothing in being a Jew. During Roman rule, Jews were opressed and after Arab Conquest they were allowed to pray in Temple Mount. There were also Jews in the Early Muslim Conquest and were our friends in Muslim Spain. After 1492, the Jews were resettled in North Africa and Ottoman lands. Until Zionism and minority rule in Isreal after 1948, we were friends. We hate Isreal noy Jews
Thanks for your honesty
History is always written by the winners, but in this video, its written by defeated scripts
u underestimated the Muslims victory in every single way
100 % true
That’s like saying that nazi Germany was a very loving place, but since they didn’t win they were smeared. Basically that’s a pile of shit like reading Quran or bible for “historical” purposes
yeap..just like your name brother..100% true
Mista Sissy Six History is actually very well preserved in the Quran. It even predicted the future of the Byzantine-sassanid war. Google it if you don’t believe me.
Arab world العالم العربي oh sure if you predict enough stuff it’ll become true. And Quran proves my point, it was written to create a narrative
Everyone in the comment section talking about Khalid Ibn Walid, meanwhile commander who behind this masterpiece was Saad Ibn Abi Waqqas and Al-Qaqa Ibn Amr At Tamimi 😭
Khalid ibn Walid was a military genius
zakback99 thats true i heard he was one of the 2 ppl in all arabia that could master fighting with 2 swords
This could be a legend, I'm a Muslim but I believe ancient Arabs always exaggerated.
no he rode a small donkey
The reinforcement was ali ibn abi talib A. S.
golden foxa, and a psychopathic murder!
please we need a video about Ain- Jalut battle between Mamluks and Mongols soon !!
Soon.
Kings and Generals thank u 😍😍😍
Great job but I want Japanese invasions
Kings and generals your the best
General vs General duets... badass!
Khalid never lost a war, enemies pissed when they heard his name.
Level❤️
You talking about Ghengis Khan,anyone didn't know him 😂😂😂
@Qazi Waqas 🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩💩💩💩💩🇸🇦🇸🇦💩💩💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩💩💩🇸🇦🇸🇦💩💩💩💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩💩💩💩🇸🇦🇸🇦💩💩💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦
@@cenanmehmet that Genghis Khan not meet khalid the sword of Allah
Genghis also pissed in his pants if he meet him once The undefeatable Khalid bin Waleed
It was because of what he had under his helmet!
Arabs were strong fighters . and noble warriors .
Used to be strong fighters
Arab Power ☝🏽💪🏼
Witch Chan
Hezbollah are not Arabs. They are in Lebanon which is in the Arab League like some other countries. They don’t look like Arabs. Yes, they speak Arabic but they’re not pure arabs. Real Arabs are from the Arabian Peninsula.
you should say muslims not arabs
@@user73227 u sound stupid
The reason the caliphate went to war with the Persians was because the shah had publicly insulted their envoy and torn his letter to pieces in his court. This was considered an act of war.
Rex Galilae that happenned a long time before this, the main reason was that the Caliphate knew the Byzantines and Persians would eventually attack them anyway so they took the initiative. Attacking the Persians was initially for food supply and more converts while attacking the Levant was to secure trade and access to European seas. Egypt would also be useful for trade and more converts. Islam was spread along these conquests, but it was not the only reason.
Shah have also insulted Heraclius before. But the brownies we beat in the streets are not zoroastrians! ;)
+Santhomph
"the Caliphate knew the Byzantines and Persians would eventually attack them anyway "
Ahahahah! Where does this myth come from? How could anyone seriously believe the Persians and Romans would be interested in a giant desert which Arabia was at the time? Let alone that they would want war and expansion after nearly destroying themselves for 20 years.
Seriously, where does this bullshit come from? I see it all the time as a justification for the Arab Conquests but it's patent bullshit.
+Mr Abdi
You don't believe you need valid justification for invading and conquering someone else? So if I say that Israel should just get the entire Middle East because their economy and living standards are way better than the other states, would you be ok with that? I don't think so.
Anyway, you're sidestepping from my point. The Persians and Romans were not planning to invade Arabia, this is nonsense. The Arabs were planning to spread their empire into the Levant and Mesopotamia beforehand and siezed the smallest casus beli to justify it.
There's nothing wrong about admitting that these conquests were agressive wars, the Romans and Persians did agressive wars all the time too. But spare me some bullshit narrative about how the poor Arabs were just defending themselves from an imminent fictional invasion by foreigners.
Also don't thumb up your own comments, it makes you look a little pretentious.
marvelfannumber1 The truth is that Muslims have a bad habit of invading land of others. They justify it with weird reasons later.
Just accept it.
You wanted wealth, woman and converts for your religion.
Awesome, as usual. Khalid ibn Alwaleed can be ranked as high as Sun tzu in terms of military brilliance, if not even higher. It's a shame that he, for some reason, is ignored most of the time.
Thanks!
Totally agree he needs more recognition
He is ignored because he was a muslim.
Spot on for he beat the super powers at the time the romans 1000yrs and the persians 10,000 yrs and never lost a battle too. He helped to create an empire that is still unchanged in terms of religious dominance with in that area, Sun Tzus impact in his region is nothing in comparison.
some sources even say that there were more than 140,000 Persian troops.
What an extraordinary victory
كانوا 200 الف
Arab from Algeria and proud, inchAllah the Arab Union ☝🏽💪🏼
Say Muslims and not Arabs.
Sarrazin Warriors Muslim union.
Arabs ⚔️
Alishér
No Arabs Unit we can destroy anything in front of us because Allah with us as usual ⚔️
in sha Allah
Sassanian and Byzantine "chained" error -
The the term silsilah, translated to "chained" was a colloquial term from al-Tabari's Histories. It was not only used to describe Sassanian infantry, but Byzantine and Sassanian cavalry. It was the "Byzantine" systems or more correctly professionally drilled troops, whether foot or horse. The term "chained" means moving as one or one body for that formation. See History of al-Tabari Vol. 12 pages 54 & 55 Note # 206 - Dr. L. Conrad maintains that the term silsilah, which is used in some of these texts, originally referred to a Byzantine military formation...
Which is makes all the more remarkable for the Muslim victories during the Sassanian civil war at that time.
Thank you for your great work!
I think "silsilah" means "chain" in general. For instance, it can be the chain of mountains. Otherwise, all true, great comment. :-) Thank you!
I thought Silsila meant Series ?lol
how would you even chain an entire army together and still expect it to fight as strong as it could without chains?
+The Bridge not an army, but groups of 5 to 20 soldiers.
I mean did they actually think that was gonna make their troops stronger? If so then they deserved to lose haha. I mean maybe it made them more disciplined and willing to fight, but I seriously doubt that chaining your troops together had any tactical advantage.
رضي الله عن ابي بكر وعمر وخالد وعلي وصحابة اجمعين وجمعنا الله بهم في جنات النعيم مع سيد المرسلين ❤
اللهم آمين
أمين يارب العلمين ،لتوضيح هذا الفيديو لم ينقل الواقعة بتدقيق ولم يذكر حتي اسم القعقاع ابن عمر هوا من قاد الجويوش الاسلامية لهزم الفرس
لعن الله علی عمر و ابوبکر و خالد بن ولید و جمیع الوحوش هجم ب بلادی و جمع هم فی الجهنم
@@سعیدشیرانی-ج6ح
ولعنة على خامنئي وأتباعه إلى يوم الدين
عمر=👹
"Ana Khalid bin walid"(i am khalid bin walid).. this loud sentence of khalid RA was usually enough to demoralise the enemy...