SECOND SEASON: ua-cam.com/video/baHT2nR5Wr4/v-deo.html A few notes: - We have previously covered some of these battles, but the videos have been outdated graphically and we wanted to present a more clear picture. More battles added, while the research is improved. There will be 2 more episodes covering the expansion of the early Muslim state, and these 2 videos will cover events in North Africa, Iran, Central Asia, Spain, France, and Anatolia among others. - Most of the primary sources of this period are Muslim, but they are largely corroborated by the later Byzantine and Iranian sources. - Speaking of the Byzantines. We used "Romans" and "Byzantines" interchangeably throughout the video. Some people will not like this, but the words are there to convey meaning and if the meaning is communicated, then we are doing ok. - Chill.
“I have fought in so many battles seeking martyrdom that there is no spot in my body left without a scar or a wound made by a spear or sword. And yet here I am, dying on my bed like an old camel. May the eyes of the cowards never rest” Khalid Ibn Alwaleed
Then how was the muslim ottoman empires were destoryed by the christian britian empire. In the end game before the UN and such,the christian armies destroyed and ruled over every muslim empires including even arabia. Deal with it
@hiooxkrmagkis9323 He was just a Muslim who was fighting for spreading the truth and giving people the opportunity to decide their own religion, not fighting for Yemen or even for the sake of Arabs or Turks.
@@MA-bi4em there are some bad guys in every religion who are fi.ghting just for power, including muslims of course. but Islam itself is extraordinary, and you become more extraordinary the more you adhere to Islam, and Khalid was one of the extraordinary guys, you can see that through his life story.
Fun fact: Khalid Ibn Al-Walid was never defeated his whole life, even when he fought against Muslims before becoming one! An absolute genius military leader.
@@elmascapo6588 are you talking about Al Andalus? They were about 8 centuries ruling that place (711-1492), oh yeah, and many places still carry Islamic names.
@@elmascapo6588 Steamrolled? Lol you took over 700 years to kick us out of there lol, remmber Battle of Sagrajas? It took more time to kick us out of the peninsula than discovering the entire Americas bruh, we Muslims steam rolled you in a few years and it took you over 700 years, so pathetic, you're so pathetic
Correction: there were a 2 reasons on why Omar relieved Khalid from commanding the Army: 1) A lot of the muslim soldiers started to get the impression that Khalid must be there in order for them to win. Omar wanted to remove this illusion from their heads for their own sake. 2) Khalid wanted to make fast decisions based on his own judgment (Abu Baker granted Khalid the freedom to do so) but Omar wanted to oversee any major movement because he was too careful about Rules of engagements especially after receiving complains from the tribes about Khalid as you mentioned and Omar is known for taking complains seriously and questioning the Commanders, Governors and Businessmen about their Ethics to prevent corruption. Even though Khalid is a righteous man but Omar still does’t like operating in the grey area. Omar’s Nickname is “Al Farouq” which means the one who distinguish between Right and Wrong in even the tiniest situations. Theres was absolutely no animosity between them, just a disagreement.
The third is Umar bin Khattab choose abu Ubaidah to be the general because abu Ubaidah is generous and pay attention to the people of the city that defeated, Khalid bin Walid only pay attention in war, Allah know best
Kanz ul Ummal, Volume 5 page 619 Tradition 14091: Ibn Abi Aun and others narrated that Khalid bin al-Walid claimed that Malik bin Nuwayrah had become Murtad according to the information that he (Khalid) had received. Malik denied this and said: ‘I am a Muslim, I never changed.’ Abu Qutada and Abdullah ibn Umar testified that (Malik is Muslim) but Khalid ordered Dharar bin Al-Auzwar to behead him (Malik). Then Khalid took his (Malik’s) wife. (Umar) said to Abu Bakr: ‘He (Khalid) has performed adultery, you have to stone him’. Abu Bakr said: ‘I can’t stone him; he interpreted hence made a mistake’. (Umar) said: ‘Then dismiss him’. He (Abu Bakr) said: ‘I cannot put the sword back in the sheath'
@@DisHappah Hahah my friend you are smoking weed. He and his brother had a battle (i.e fight) over his father throne and he lost. Later on his son had battle (i.e flight) with each other to have the throne which makes his empire very week.
@@DisHappah he was defeated in Kabul, later losing after animosity ensued inside muslim army , so that's one defeat to gingis army in his life , a decisive defeat. Later , the mongol were annihilated starting from qutuz mamluk , who deployed their own tactics and were higher in discipline, then Baybars the memluk lion decimated mongol stronghold on middle east and anatolia over 33 years sweeping the area clean of them . People who hate muslim prowess and valor , say the elections of Khan Khanate saved the world from their conquest , stands not true , in Europe they already won the two well known powers, Hungary and Russia . In Muslim lands ,yet , the memluk were the most powerful power in the east , more to your dismay , they literally ended the Mongolian invasion , a type of people who never let go of losing battle without retribution , after the no. 1 world power established itself , they were annihilated and bit away to bitter losses, they just don't say it , because it doesn't suit them
@@DisHappah which one stands out a lie to you ? The defeat gingis army encountered at Kabul in afghanistan , the later win he got from the divided muslim army that just bashed him previously? Or the change of events starting from the glorious win in ain jalut on qutuz hands ? The ensuing chain of wars to retaliate that defeat , which down played to keep the won lands , which downplayed again to run for their lives and leaving Syria, Iraq, turkey and half of Iran free from mongol control for good , on the hands of ferocious Baybars For 33 years ? Which one , exactly , stands out as a lie ? Or is it what I explained before hand, disheartening hatred towards Islamic achievements , even if it meant saving the world from brutal blood lusting , not convinced except by sword, arrogant people !!
FYI, Khalid and Omar didn't have any animosity between each other. Omar received Khalid because he was worried that people were crediting the the victories of the Muslims to Khalid's leadership instead of to Allah. He demoted Khalid to signal the Muslim's success didn't come from a single man but from God. Khalid also didn't stop fighting, he just re-enlisted as a foot soldier and kept fighting the good fight.
Guys believe or not.. I was living in the same neighborhood as the grave of Khaled Ibn Al-Walid in Homs. The neighborhood called “alkhalidia” and i used to visit him almost everyday when i was going to school. That was before the war in Syria
May Allah help Syria, I hope the war ends soon, and stability returns to the Middle East. Honestly, I envy you for being able to visit the grave of one of the greatest commanders in history.
@RD Do ok , so the 30 million africans were captured enslaved and transported to americas by muslims ? Estimates of the number killed by the Spanish Inquisition, which Sixtus IV authorised in a papal bull in 1478, have ranged from 30,000 to 300,000. Some historians are convinced that millions died. in my country In 2017, the Algerian League for the Defense of Human Rights, an NGO, estimated that the victims of the French colonial rule at over 10 million from 1830 to 1962 .not mentioning 17 nuclear boms experiments . please don t tell me our religion is violent
@RD Do Iraq and Afghanistan war started by the US where millions died and millions more are displaced was started because of christianity. Bush said that "God" told him to invade Iraq and Afghanistan. Not to mention the DOD was given the president defense reports littered with biblical verses complimenting pictures of the previous days war efforts. Also, dont forget the last words of the bombing crew that dropped two nuclear bombs that killed millions in japan: "In jesus's name amen" Now, reverse the situation and imagine if a Muslim leader said that "Allah" told him to invade two countries in lets say Europe and the defense department of his country were giving him reports filled with Quranic verses with pictures of the war. Or lets say a bombing crew of a Muslim country (for example pakistan) ends their prayer with "In Allah's name ameen" before heading to their bombers to drop two nukes in a european country. How much would you lose your mind and start going apeshit about it? keep in mind this is all recently in the modern era. NOT the medieval or pre-medieval era.
@@hamidtabrizi7028 Ha-ha-ha-ha, Genghis Khan failed. He did not fight the Arabs. He died before they reached Baghdad, and no one could stop the Mongols except Muslims.
The reason Omar Bin Al-Khatab changed leadership from Khalid to Abu Obaida was because most of the major victories were under Khalid's lead and he didn't want soldiers to develop the believe that victory comes because of Khalid's leadership only leading to a major loss of moral in case of his death, and to show them that it was the sincerity and sheer devotion of the soldiers that brought victory no matter who leads.
it is underrated for Western as they think about their own History only , And we damn care about their History and what they think , Khalid Ibn Walid R.A is a household name in every Muslims house , We named Our Children Khalid
Sword of god 🗡 Never defeated , all victories , non have killed him , he broke and have destroyed two large empires ( Romans and Persians ) at once Yes was truth what the prophet said : Khalid is the sword of Allah ..! And that’s a miracle , because if he is really the sword of Allah he should never be beaten ! And it was 😎♥️😊 miracle
Khalid ibn al waleed was an amazing man He would spend all his day in the battle field and all his night worshiping Allah. That’s one side of the muslim personnality that wasn’t mentioned in this beautiful documentary. Thank you
@@Enraged-vu2vb ah i see that hate of yours ... Well khaled never lost a battle so u calm yourself ur opinion is worthless cuz his action speaks for him a great general with unique understanding of warfare tactics and fighting skills
Such an unique start of a religion, challenged 2 big powers to war at the start of it expansion. Even demanding the leaders of those empires to convert. Khalid Ibn Walid though, he probably one of the best commander in history.
Actually they already know they’re going to take down the 2 big empires , because prophet Mohammed prophesied it, when the muslims were in makkah surrounded by quraish pagan tribe, muslims were weak at that point and lesser numbers , even the companions said to themselves how we gonna do it?? But yet nothing is hard for allah the almighty.
@RD Do it was always the religion of peace for people who want peace , for what god say :- AND FIGHT in God's cause against those who wage war against you, but do not commit aggression-for, verily, God does not love aggressors.
@Winston Maraj boi stop crying in every comment .. you are bragging by wins in 6 days ? .. yeah but we won in 6 hours in 1973 LOL .. we literally crashed your parleef wall "which you was calling it the strongest defence in the world" with fckin water hoses man wtf are you talking about
The most fascinating about Khaled is that he came from desert land and never went to war college or study tactics in school, he was born as great general
@@unitedstateofearth5265 It's universally known that Rashidun scribes stupidly inflate and exaggerate enemy numbers to make their generals appear miraculous. If you really believe that those numbers you mentioned are accurate, well history is not for you.
"May the eyes of cowards never sleep" -Khalid ibn al waleed Edit: wow never expected a war out here+958 likes Edit 2: I think u should go read the replies. They're litteraly so amusing
@@6507353 he fought for Islam m8, also many of your Christian kings also killed many people, but, then again, Jesus forgives all sins so they will go to heaven 😂
Bloody hell... khalid is a absolute monster. I’ve heard he was an excellent general but i wasn’t expecting this level of tactical brilliance. Both empires despite being battered by wars with one another are still able to recruit massive armies to strike back at the muslims yet khalid just kept on winning. Khalid might even give caesar or hannibal a run for their money. Forget saladin, this might just be one of the greatest muslims commanders yet!
He is honestly in my opinion the best commander ever. I think his record has zero losses. All the other contenders were eventually defeated or killed while he died on his bed wishing to have died on the battlefield
Greco Cabanero i read about it and it seemed that either he was defeated (not exactly though) or he won a hard victory. I think its the latter. This can make sense about the mutiny because usually soldiers actually get wealth and power after wars if they are winning decisively. If they are not, they mutiny. I think that what happened
@@J.R.Penrice yeah Alexander was also undefeated but Khalid was also a great administrator. Observe how he stopped after every successful conquest of a city to establish a tax base and a supplies, appoint governor's etc. Alexander conquered for the sake of conquest. He died and so did his empire.
When Muslims were very few in numbers and were facing an attack from Meccans, Muhammad (pbuh) prophesized that the key to Yemen, Persia, Rome was given to him. He also prophesized that Muslims will conquer Egypt. And all of it were conquered by Muslims within just a span of few years.
Al-Barā’ ibn ‘Āzib (rA) reports that while digging the trench outside Madinah to repel an approaching army, a massive boulder obstructed them and no ax could break it. With time running out, and with people’s fears and hunger growing, the Prophet ﷺ walked over and picked up the ax. He said, “Bismillāh (In God’s name),” and hammered the boulder, reducing a chunk of it to rubble. He said, “Allāhu Akbar (God is Great)! I have been given the keys to Shām; I can see its red palaces at this very moment.” Then he shattered another chunk and said, “Allāhu Akbar! I have been given the keys to Persia; I can see Madain’s white palace.” Then he shattered the last chunk and said, “Allāhu Akbar! I have been given the keys to Yemen. By Allah, I can see the Gates of Sanaa at this very moment from here.” Regarding Egypt, he ﷺ took its conquest for granted, knowing his Lord’s promise was true. Abū Dharr (rA) narrated: The Prophet ﷺ said: “You will certainly conquer Egypt, a land in which [a currency called] al-qīrāṭ is customary. When you conquer it, be gracious to its people, for they are entitled to a covenant and [the right of] family bonds. And when you see two men disputing over the place of a brick, then leave [Egypt].”
@@CatholicCrusaderofYeshua You decided to completely ignore the fact this is a mind-blowing prophecy which came true. And you also decided to completely ignore the fact that the bible is full of violence. If you are a truth seeker destroy your own bias first.
@@CatholicCrusaderofYeshua Prophet Muhammad forbade the ki...ing of woman, children, animals. Even destroying crops is forbidden. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) also prophesied the sufferings of Muslims today. He said, "‘The nations will summon each other upon you as you call guests to eat from a plate of food,’ they said ‘Will we be few in number on that day O Messenger of God?’ He said, ‘No, rather you will be many on that day, but you will be [disunited and weak] like the foam on the ocean. And God will remove the fear in the hearts of your enemies and place in your hearts al-wahan.’ They said, ‘What is al-wahan O Messenger of God?’ He said, ‘Love of this world and hatred of death.’ " -------------------------- If I condemn occupation and conquest it will stop America, Israel and the West from invading us, right? Actually we see the opposite from the history. Since Muslims have become coward and stopped fighting the injustice upon them only increased. Today we are crying helplessly. We are begging others not to k...ll our children. Did it stop the Christians and the Jews? No, and it never will.
@@amaterasu6888 Nah. Even if I’m a muslim, I don’t think, the master of the Katana would fail in 1vs1. Maybe an army, that is clever and strategically strong could win against an army full of Samurais.
they always argue that the only rival for Japanese Samurai was a Knight wielding a Longsword, but after study history closely, I seriously think that an Arab wielding Shamshir that fight in the name of God is the true rival for Japanese Samurai (this documentary even support Muslim/Arab Claim, they hardly lost any duel)
@@C0wb0yBebop Don't put DJ with his name 😡. He lead more than 50 battles as general in his lifetime and never lost even a single one. He was nicknamed "Saif-ullah" by the Prophet (P.B.U.H) which means Sword of God. Music is not considered good in Islam so putting DJ with his name is disrespectful, I hope you understand.
@hiOOxkr magkis He didn't only kill people he did great things aswel, why are you shitting on west while someone praises Muslim warlord? also Alexander the Great is mentioned in Quran aswel and not as a mass murderer
Dulkarnayn is said to be the Persian king Cyrus the great not Alexander who was confirmed to be bisexual . God would never chose such a sinner as his prophet
Fun fact: The title of "Caliph" means successor, steward or deputy and it stems from the Arabic word "Khalifa" which means successor or ruler. So Abu Bakr by taking on the tile of "Caliph" symbolically signaled that Muhammad was still the true leader of the Islamic faith and he was only acting in accordance to Muhammad and by extension Allah's will.
„Khalifa“ is short for „khalifat Allah“ and means „representative (of God)“. That was the title of all Muslim Caliphs until al-Mamun. Only then it was changed to „khalifat Rasul Allah“, „representative of the messenger of God“. See also the book „God‘s Caliph“ by Danish professor Patricia Crone.
@@Spitamenes There's also the less talked about but still historically significant title of "Wahalimarti Khalifat" roughly translating to "Walmart manager" in english. During the 21st century they established themselves as rulers of rural America. In many ways they mirror their Rashidun ancestors in their talent for trade and their swift though often brutal conquests...
Amr Farouk That may be its meaning today, but 1400 years ago it was more or less „representative“. In the Quran itself (2:30) the word is used to describe Adam as the representative of God on Earth. Adam could hardly be Godˋs successor. That‘s also why the Shia still consider their Imams „khalifat Allah“, representatives of God, preserving an original Islamic concept that has been lost in Sunniism.
The strategy at 36:00 is one of the most incredible I have heard of in warfare history. Imagine, dividing your army into 3 factions, maneuvering and getting them past enemy lines, to all meet up at the same time at the designated target location. In the age of information, I can't even navigate my own city without using a GPS when I am going out for a drive. It blows my mind the ingenuity and sheer brilliance executing this task! Khalid was truly one of the greatest generals in history! Marvelous!
there is an historian called roy Casagranda who said exactly the same thing (about this exact same event using the example of the GPS in modern times !) ! Yes really Khalid ibn al walid and the rashidun caliphate in general were outstanding exceptions in history.
@@tasinal-hassan8268 No, Zoroastrians definitely didn't controll Middle East and much of the Arabian Panninsula for centuries. And the Library at Ctesiphon, built by Zoroastrian emperor Khosrou Anushirvan definitely wasn't the main inspiration for the House of Wisdom. And Zoroastrians definitely didn't play a major role in both Caliphate administration and the Islamic Golden Age (the translation movement). Definitely they weren't as bright as the enlightened Muslims. Believe what you want and lie to yourself, but lemme quote one of your caliphs: "The Persians ruled for a thousand years and did not need us Arabs even for a day. We have been ruling them for one or two centuries and cannot do without them for an hour." ~Abbasid Caliph, Al-Ma'mun
@Warmessage Cyrus the Great was not a Zoroscum. He was a monotheist,and he married a Jew. He's one of the candidates for Dhul Qarnayn. But otherwise, you're right.
Ultimately there was a betrayal by the Parthian clans amongst the 7 that led to the fall of the Empire. They refused to back Yazdegerd after Nahavand and made separate peace with the arabs and were complicit in the murder of Yazdegerd .
Man Khalid Ibn Walid deserves to be known more about in the west. I never hear of him. He was personally pretty badass fighting duels and on the frontlines with his men and his tactics are like, one level below Caesar himself in terms of how high-risk high-reward they were, he was definitely extremely daring as a general.
Exactely bro, i swear im not saying it cse im Muslim too but the man is a genius, i wrote this genius and i know im not giving him the recognzation he deserves, he is among the 5 best in the history of warfare, but he got somth none ever had as a leader, throwing himself in front lines, challenging commanders, he sacrificed himself before his soldiers! I never read of a leader or commander ever doing this, they were like him big tacticians, geniuses, braves, but none of em sacrificed themselves as he did, and what blows the mind more is to know that he died in his bed a normal death! Really "no woman is capable to give birth to another Khalid" -Caliph Omar
Ceasar had a well equipped and trained roman military machine behind him and fought mostly inferior troops. While Khalid bin walid had inferior numbers, inferior quality of equiptment and an infant state to support him but he still managed to bring two empires to their knees.
@@akiburrahman314 Caesar fought Pompei, another roman. Also, both the Byzantines and Sassinids were in terrible condition when the Arabs invaded. it's not as simple as just saying "Persians and Romans" and then assuming they were always well trained and in amazing spirit the way we remember them. Also Caesar also had inferior numbers.
So to resume all of this Khalid can take a few guys, few camels, few horses and destroy empires. Now that’s IMPRESSIVE. An even better one how often do you hear in this video Khalid was outnumbered so Khalid devised a plan. LEGENDARY.
i beg to differ with maximo he is currently oone of the greatest generals of history greater than frederick the great of course he still loses to mr takeda shingen mr wellington and mr napoleon bonaparte the greatest general in history(although we can maybe put yi sun sin somewhere on the list since he was the god of the seas like amazing fights seriously)
@@asmrnaturecat984 This makes no sense since the Muslims themselves came out of their own civil war. When the likes of Jordan Peterson mentioned paraphrased "no scholars understand how it was done" cuz of how wild and unprecedented it was, who are you to make an lame comparison like that?
@marouane Attahali you are right howevrr he did say the arabs had more mobility and less armour. The persian army was heavy armoured and are not used to hot desert weather like khalids beduin army also their clothing added to their heavy armour didn’t help hence why I believe this to be true they were more fatigued then the arab army
@marouane Attahali thats the reason why khalid always chose to fight with the desert to his back. But the reasons you mentioned is exactly why the muslim army was more comfortable and more mobile. Yes they lived on dates and water which made supply easier and less heavy than their persian counter parts. Less armour made them more mobile and less tired in the desert than persians who are not used to the desert.
@marouane Attahali It depends hannibals army in cannae was less armoured than the romans but other factors played in. Yes the favour in terms of arms was im the hands of the persian but in terms of terrain was for the muslims more mobile and less armour means faster movement and less fatigue its very logical?..
Im Egyptian muslim and i find this content very fair like many other contents. You deserve the Oscar of online content for such a channel. Khalid Ibn Al-Walid inherited his fathers wealth, who was the wealthiest man among all Arabs, yet him and his two brothers, Hesham and Al-Walid give it all away for the sake of spreading the new religion Islam. He was named (The sword of Allah) by prophet Mohamed peace be upon him and maybe be he didn't die fighting because the sword of Allah can't be broken. Became the Emir of Muslim armies and died leaving behind only his sword and horse. if i have a boy ill name his Khalid without doubt.
@@rahulchavan4088well… that tends to be how that worked. Both Christianity and Islam have very long histories of military conquests, persecution of religious minorities, and forced conversions. They are also the largest religions today so those tactics clearly worked haha
Umar RA relieved Khalid RA because people increasingly started to put their faith in him and Umar RA believed that this weakened their faith in Allah. It was not out of any personal animosity. These caliphs were not typical monarchs, but spiritual leaders as well. So Umar (RA) showed the people that the victories were from Allah, hence strengthening their faith.
It's the wrong decision, although I love 💘 umar, what you forget is that the Noble prophet Muhammad s.a.w) and Abu bakr would never have demoted him, sword of Allah, remember..
@Rashid...it would have no worries if Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was alive but he was not. Omar was worried Khalid (ra )would have been treated like how Shia treats Ali (ra)right now
It's questionable for me, Why did the Arab Nations call 'Khalid bin Waleed' a "Hero"? 'Khalid ibn Walid' was from the 'Bani Makhzum' tribe of the 'Quraysh' tribe (Of the 29 battles of the Prophet Muhammad, 12 was against the Quraysh tribe. The Quraysh tribe was one of the Arab tribes of Hejaz.) His father, 'Walid ibn Mughira', was one of The most stubborn enemies of Islam. 'Khalid ibn Walid' was one of the 'Quraysh' allies who had the "position of the Dome," meaning the arsenal and ammunition, as well as the position of head of the 'Quraysh' army. He was one of the commanders of the polytheists (pagan) in the battle of 'Uhud' Against Islam and one of the causes of the defeat of the Islamic army in that battle. He took part in all the pagan wars "against" the 'Prophet Muhammad', After (bayʻat ar-riḍwān), they united. In the case of the Massacre and looting 'Malik bin Noireh' Arab tribe, After Massacre 'Khalid' killed 'Malik ibn Nuwayrah' while he was (an Arab and Muslim) then raped his wife that night, and put Malik's head in a pot of food and cooked it! had also committed adultery. also, the Massacres and looting Muslims of the 'Jazima' Arab tribes (The way it was fought was also cowardly, This is another story). in the battle of 'Ullais', 'Khalid Ibn Walid' said if they could defeat the "Sassanid" army in the battle of 'Ullais' (the Ullais region in the al-Badiyah area near the Euphrates River, 633 AD in Iraq), "I paint the river red with their blood" and because the 'Sasanian' Army was defeated( Coup in the Sasanian capital, This is another story); By order of 'Khalid', the people of the city (They were of Arab descent), all of them (Anyone who could not escape the city, children, women, old men) taken captive, By order Khalid They beheaded them And their blood was shed in the river. 'al-Mughira ibn Shu'ba' says" There were mills along the river, by order 'Khalid' They made flour with bloody water for three days and prepared food for the army of 18,000 or more. The dead in 'Ellis' was forty or seventy thousand people. 'Khalid bin Waleed' committed war crimes. he is the butcher of a lot of Arab people (Muslims and non-Muslims). According to Shari'a Law, They should have executed 'Khalid bin Walid'. For political reasons 'Prophet Muhammad' covered 'Khalid' sins And crimes because he needed his services. Actually 'Prophet Muhammad' was a partner in the sins of 'Khalid ibn Walid'. for example, 'Amr' (second caliph), strongly objected to him, called him an enemy of God, and swore that he would kill 'Khalid'. (throwing stones at his head until he died). But since 'Abu Bakr' (first caliph) desperately needed Khalid's powerful army to advance his rule, he defended him and did not impose any punishment on him. . In fact, 'Khalid bin Waleed' was a criminal Mercenary in the service of Islam so that Islam could grow and spread with the help of his sword. With this description, 'Khalid bin Waleed' cannot be called a "Hero". If you look in history books, you will see many such acts. Some audiences criticize what I have mentioned above and deny it, Some people also said that Khalid bin Waleed became a Muslim and all his sins were forgiven by God. I must say that we are not talking about supernatural matters, for this reason, I mention to reference: I have translated the source address into Arabic to make your work easier, Please check again, And please read history without religious prejudice: .Reference: (History of Ya'qubi, vol. 2, pp. 110 and Al-Ghadir, vol. 7, pp. 158-166; Complete, vol. 2, p. 137; Tabari, vol. 2, p. 503; Beginning and end, vol. 6, p. 322-279) (Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari; Volume 4) (Ten thousand-year histories of Iran; Volume 2) (Tabari volumes 3 and 4;) (The Book of the Prophet's Wars; Muhammad ibn Amr Al-Waqidi; Volumes 1, 2 and 3;) (The book of the character of the Messenger of God; Ibn Hisham Volume 2.) . اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 5 صفحة : 160 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الطبري تاريخ الرسل والملوك وصله تاريخ الطبري ، مؤلف : الطبري، ابن جرير المجلد : 3 صفحة : 67 اسم الكتاب : القرآن شعراء/سوره26، آیه216 اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 5 صفحة : 160 اسم الكتاب : السيرة النبوية - ط مكتبة محمد علي صبيح وأولاده ، مؤلف : ابن هشام الحميري المجلد : 4 صفحة : 883 اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 8 صفحة : 74 اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 9 صفحة : 73 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الطبري تاريخ الرسل والملوك وصله تاريخ الطبري ، مؤلف : الطبري، ابن جرير المجلد : 3 صفحة : 280 اسم الكتاب : الاغانی ، مؤلف : ابو الفرج الإصفهاني المجلد : 15 صفحة : 203 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الإسلام - ت بشار ، مؤلف : الذهبي، شمس الدين المجلد: 2 صفحة : 24 اسم الكتاب : المختصر في اخبار البشر ، مؤلف : أبو الفداء المجلد : 1 صفحة : 158 اسم الكتاب : وفيات الأعيان ، مؤلف : ابن خلكان المجلد : 6 صفحة : 14 اسم الكتاب : مراه الجنان وعبره اليقظان ، مؤلف : اليافعي المجلد : 2 صفحة : 90 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الإسلام - ت بشار ، مؤلف : الذهبي، شمس الدين المجلد : 2 صفحة : 24 اسم الكتاب : كنز العمال ، مؤلف : المتقي الهندي المجلد : 5 صفحة : 619 اسم الكتاب : جامع الأحاديث ، مؤلف : السيوطي، جلال الدين المجلد : 24 صفحة : 433 اسم الكتاب : المختصر في اخبار البشر ، مؤلف : أبو الفداء المجلد : 1 صفحة : 158 اسم الكتاب : وفيات الأعيان ، مؤلف : ابن خلكان المجلد : 6 صفحة : 15 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الإسلام - ت بشار ، مؤلف : الذهبي، شمس الدين المجلد : 2 صفحة : 24 اسم الكتاب : الکامل فی التاریخ ، مؤلف : ابناثیر عزالدین ابوالحسن علی بن محمد جزری شیبانی المجلد: 2 صفحة : 217 اسم الكتاب : نهایة الارب فی فنون الادب ، مؤلف : النویری المجلد: 19، صفحة : 52
@@samiedi4134 you don’t even know the basics of becoming a muslim and you are trying hard to slander our religion. Our prophet Muhammad (PBUH) did not cover Khalid’s sins, Allah covered him. In Islam, if non believer becomes a believer, he becomes like a baby that’s born and all his past sins are forgiven, even if he committed a genocide. That is the benefits of those who were not born in islam and find their way gets.
Many people forget Abu ubaidah in the shadow of Khalid but Abu unbaidah was a wise brave and patient leader and played one the greatest if not the greatest role in the Levant conquests
Abu Ubaidah was put into a tough position. While a good commander, he knew Khalid was most likely a better field commander than him. Giving Khalid field command at Yarmouk was a great command decision.
@@infinitecontent8001 yes , but I think it wasn’t a tough decision Khalid was the best general and Abu ubaidah was the overall commander , i think Khalid was the best general and Abu ubaidah was a better govenor and administrator he was called the trustworthy for a reason , thank you
If your superheroes impose their religions on others, destroy their cities and populations, send tens of thousands into slavery etc. Etc. Don’t remember Superman ever doing that :)
@@henghistbluetooth7882 He was indeed a superhero. The romans were even more immoral and bloodthirsty. They and the persians have been fighting pointless wars for centuries. Innocent people suffered the most because of it. So yes Khalid (May God be pleased with him) and all the other Muslims of that time were indeed real life heroes much to the dismay of you and the likes of you.
Regarding Umar RA relieving Khalid from his command, It wasn't due to any animosity it was actually due to the fact that Khalid was winning so many battles at so many fronts in such a short time that the general populace started Attributing victories towards Khalid himself rather than Allah. Fearing that such high reverence of Khalid might lead to some sort of apostasy he immediately relieved him of Command. All though in his later years Umar RA would severely regret the decision citing that had Khalid Remained commander he may have conquered the entirety of Europe and Asia on his own.
@Michael Donato i think Umar RA made a wise decision, because Khalid Ibn Al Waleed was conquering lands faster than the Caliph could keep track of + as @hadi mentioned, his name was revered more than God, for whom he was fighting. It was not out of the fear of him making a separate name for himself that Umar RA gave the decision but the consideration of how his heroics could create space for people to idolise him. Any wise muslim ruler will take this into consideration. Plus, it was because of this decision that he was able to defeat the Byzantines in Syria
@@shuaybmuhammad1037 Let my life be sacrificed for Hazrat Umar ra but he did not make a right decision that time Coz after the death of Saifullah he regretted his decision.Sahabas are not infallible they made mistakes and the best part is they accept it without any hesitation. Hazrat Umar's reign saw Islams rise but the conquests were relatively slower cz he interfered too much in the army's welfare. He sitting in Medina used to give instructions to the commanders like who will be in charge of the left or right flank, where would the army rest when to send reinforcement. Obviously there was no whatsp that time so it took months conveying a single message and this slowed the conquests.
It's questionable for me, Why did the Arab Nations call 'Khalid bin Waleed' a "Hero"? 'Khalid ibn Walid' was from the 'Bani Makhzum' tribe of the 'Quraysh' tribe (Of the 29 battles of the Prophet Muhammad, 12 was against the Quraysh tribe. The Quraysh tribe was one of the Arab tribes of Hejaz.) His father, 'Walid ibn Mughira', was one of The most stubborn enemies of Islam. 'Khalid ibn Walid' was one of the 'Quraysh' allies who had the "position of the Dome," meaning the arsenal and ammunition, as well as the position of head of the 'Quraysh' army. He was one of the commanders of the polytheists (pagan) in the battle of 'Uhud' Against Islam and one of the causes of the defeat of the Islamic army in that battle. He took part in all the pagan wars "against" the 'Prophet Muhammad', After (bayʻat ar-riḍwān), they united. In the case of the Massacre and looting 'Malik bin Noireh' Arab tribe, After Massacre 'Khalid' killed 'Malik ibn Nuwayrah' while he was (an Arab and Muslim) then raped his wife that night, and put Malik's head in a pot of food and cooked it! had also committed adultery. also, the Massacres and looting Muslims of the 'Jazima' Arab tribes (The way it was fought was also cowardly, This is another story). in the battle of 'Ullais', 'Khalid Ibn Walid' said if they could defeat the "Sassanid" army in the battle of 'Ullais' (the Ullais region in the al-Badiyah area near the Euphrates River, 633 AD in Iraq), "I paint the river red with their blood" and because the 'Sasanian' Army was defeated( Coup in the Sasanian capital, This is another story); By order of 'Khalid', the people of the city (They were of Arab descent), all of them (Anyone who could not escape the city, children, women, old men) taken captive, By order Khalid They beheaded them And their blood was shed in the river. 'al-Mughira ibn Shu'ba' says" There were mills along the river, by order 'Khalid' They made flour with bloody water for three days and prepared food for the army of 18,000 or more. The dead in 'Ellis' was forty or seventy thousand people. 'Khalid bin Waleed' committed war crimes. he is the butcher of a lot of Arab people (Muslims and non-Muslims). According to Shari'a Law, They should have executed 'Khalid bin Walid'. For political reasons 'Prophet Muhammad' covered 'Khalid' sins And crimes because he needed his services. Actually 'Prophet Muhammad' was a partner in the sins of 'Khalid ibn Walid'. for example, 'Amr' (second caliph), strongly objected to him, called him an enemy of God, and swore that he would kill 'Khalid'. (throwing stones at his head until he died). But since 'Abu Bakr' (first caliph) desperately needed Khalid's powerful army to advance his rule, he defended him and did not impose any punishment on him. . In fact, 'Khalid bin Waleed' was a criminal Mercenary in the service of Islam so that Islam could grow and spread with the help of his sword. With this description, 'Khalid bin Waleed' cannot be called a "Hero". If you look in history books, you will see many such acts. Some audiences criticize what I have mentioned above and deny it, Some people also said that Khalid bin Waleed became a Muslim and all his sins were forgiven by God. I must say that we are not talking about supernatural matters, for this reason, I mention to reference: I have translated the source address into Arabic to make your work easier, Please check again, And please read history without religious prejudice: .Reference: (History of Ya'qubi, vol. 2, pp. 110 and Al-Ghadir, vol. 7, pp. 158-166; Complete, vol. 2, p. 137; Tabari, vol. 2, p. 503; Beginning and end, vol. 6, p. 322-279) (Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari; Volume 4) (Ten thousand-year histories of Iran; Volume 2) (Tabari volumes 3 and 4;) (The Book of the Prophet's Wars; Muhammad ibn Amr Al-Waqidi; Volumes 1, 2 and 3;) (The book of the character of the Messenger of God; Ibn Hisham Volume 2.) . اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 5 صفحة : 160 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الطبري تاريخ الرسل والملوك وصله تاريخ الطبري ، مؤلف : الطبري، ابن جرير المجلد : 3 صفحة : 67 اسم الكتاب : القرآن شعراء/سوره26، آیه216 اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 5 صفحة : 160 اسم الكتاب : السيرة النبوية - ط مكتبة محمد علي صبيح وأولاده ، مؤلف : ابن هشام الحميري المجلد : 4 صفحة : 883 اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 8 صفحة : 74 اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 9 صفحة : 73 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الطبري تاريخ الرسل والملوك وصله تاريخ الطبري ، مؤلف : الطبري، ابن جرير المجلد : 3 صفحة : 280 اسم الكتاب : الاغانی ، مؤلف : ابو الفرج الإصفهاني المجلد : 15 صفحة : 203 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الإسلام - ت بشار ، مؤلف : الذهبي، شمس الدين المجلد: 2 صفحة : 24 اسم الكتاب : المختصر في اخبار البشر ، مؤلف : أبو الفداء المجلد : 1 صفحة : 158 اسم الكتاب : وفيات الأعيان ، مؤلف : ابن خلكان المجلد : 6 صفحة : 14 اسم الكتاب : مراه الجنان وعبره اليقظان ، مؤلف : اليافعي المجلد : 2 صفحة : 90 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الإسلام - ت بشار ، مؤلف : الذهبي، شمس الدين المجلد : 2 صفحة : 24 اسم الكتاب : كنز العمال ، مؤلف : المتقي الهندي المجلد : 5 صفحة : 619 اسم الكتاب : جامع الأحاديث ، مؤلف : السيوطي، جلال الدين المجلد : 24 صفحة : 433 اسم الكتاب : المختصر في اخبار البشر ، مؤلف : أبو الفداء المجلد : 1 صفحة : 158 اسم الكتاب : وفيات الأعيان ، مؤلف : ابن خلكان المجلد : 6 صفحة : 15 اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الإسلام - ت بشار ، مؤلف : الذهبي، شمس الدين المجلد : 2 صفحة : 24 اسم الكتاب : الکامل فی التاریخ ، مؤلف : ابناثیر عزالدین ابوالحسن علی بن محمد جزری شیبانی المجلد: 2 صفحة : 217 اسم الكتاب : نهایة الارب فی فنون الادب ، مؤلف : النویری المجلد: 19، صفحة : 52
Correction at 8:45 Yemen entered Islam willingly at the life of the prophet, the entire Hamadan tribe entered Islam in one day which made the prophet knell to God with gratitude. Yemen wasn’t “easy prey”, this implies it raised the sword against Islam while it accepted it without force.
الحقيقة ان كتاب التاريخ مابعد الخلافة الراشدة حاولوا بكل الطرق الاستنقاص من اليمن في كل فرصة يجدونها مثلاََ حين يذكر القادة العظام من الصحابة والذين ينتسبون لمضر او نزار وا غيرها من القبائل العدنانية تجدهك يكتبون كل الامجاد التي تبدوا في مخليتهم لكن حين يأتي الدور على القادة العظام من العرب اليمانية لا يذكرون الا مروراََ كأنهم مضطرون لذكرهم قادة من امثال ذو الكلاع الحميري والعلاء الحضرمي َعمرو بن معد يكرب وغيرهم يذكرون على استحياء وهذا ماتعمدت فعله كل المصادر خاصة في عهد الامويين واوئل العهد العباسي.
@@laitilulu he means millions in Urdu. Even I a Muslim don't believe it. If the Roman number was more than the Muslims its 2 to 1 maximum and some of Muslim sources dont exaggerate while others make it a sci-fi novel 😂
@@laitilulu so what sources are valid? from people who never saw or heard about the event? in your standard even roman history and Macedonian history would be under same skepticism as their events were documented by roman and macedonian historians respictevely. So, in your standards, history of humanity is not reliable.
@Saquib Khan NO i DON'T BELIEVE THINGS WITHOUT PROOF.....YOUR DUMB...GO READ ABOUT SOLOMON'S FLYING CARPET IN YOUR QURAN , OR MAYBE TALKING COWS....HEY i'M BEING NICE AND NOT MENTIONING THE SICK STUFF MUHAMMAD WAS NOT A REAL MAN .
Never learned any of this history in school. Learned about European history, etc, but didn't realize how interesting early Muslim history was. Great video! 👍
@@tamazghaunion9158 Thats irrelevant, thier past is not related to the topic and the event. They become Muslims already and look at your comment: u said Rashidun Caliphate you are talking about islamic period not pagans.
Let's just appreciate the praise made in Tamazghas comment. His intention was only to show how badass they were in achieving those wins, beer was just modern slang reference, which he even clarified by turning it into water :)
We have a population of some 350 million people, they claim that one million people have been confirmed as having Corona virus, that's one out of every 350. Your chances of getting hit by lightning is one in 300. Are people wearing hardhats with lighting rods on them to protect themselves from lighting? It's a farce. But because of it, people are paying $600.00 for freezers that wouldn't have sold for $100.00 three months ago. The last one we sold had 200 hits on the advertising in Facebook within 3 hours of posting it, they came from up to 150 miles away for the one freezer we advertised because all the stores sold all they had weeks ago and are saying they won't be able to get any more until August. Of course if they didn't cram their freezers with so much food they block off the circulation of air that causes freezers to fail, they wouldn't need to look for another one. People are crazy. I'm curious to know what it is this is diverting attention from. A .005% chance of getting flu isn't something I'm going to worry about. Don't worry, it's not going to last much longer.
@@dancingwiththedarkness3352 You are right bro. But to answer your question of what it is diverting our attention from, most likely the enormous troop placement that is occuring atm near the Lithuanian, Polish and Ukranian borders. 'Defender 2020' is a farce. More than 1k tanks, and a huge ammount of humvee's, AA-mounts, Troop Transports, Logistical Trucks, over 100k soldiers and a Fleet in the Baltic Sea, is NOT neccesary for a 'Military excercise'. Largest troop displacement of the US to Europe in over 25 years.. Even in this moment dozens of trains & planes are arriving by the day in those areas carrying even more military equipment. But ofc Russia is going to be made the agressor by the Media in the not too distant future. Not saying Russia is a Saint, but this kind of Military Troop Displacement, the russians havent seen since Operation Barbossa by the Germans. And as far as Corona goes, it is a Virus, it is deadly, but the panic we be doing is totally excagerated. We be putting on Masks and maintaining Social Distance like its an airbourne virus, which it is not. If it were we'd have 100's of millions of infected, and millions dead.
@@admiralsquatbar127 you would think so, all the retail stores sold out their freezers two weeks ago, they still let people put orders in, knowing they wouldn't get them until July. We checked again Monday, they won't let you preorder them and won't get any more until August, those factory's have been shut down and have to fill the back orders first, whenever they decide they can go back to work. We have to get used ones whenever we can find them. Of course they are aware of the law of supply and demand. They know theres no supply and have been demanding 5 times what we used to get them for. Then being used, they've been selling ones that can't be fixed with the good ones. The only way to make sure their good is plug them in and run them for 24 hours. Between the cost of buying them and the junk ones we had to pay $400.00 each for that can't be fixed, so far we are making about $25.00 on each one sold. The only reason we bother is people who are going to lose over a thousand dollars of food unless they can get another freezer fast enough. Another week and we won't have any refrigerators either. We constantly check on the stores, but there are people who need one, but seeing the price think we're ripping people off, then they go all over town finding out they can't get one anywhere. They run back to get ours, but they usually are paid for and hauled off within a hour after we open. They're freaking out because they're losing all that food and all we can tell them is if we find more, we'll call them, but they if they don't get there quickly enough, someone will buy it. It's artificial shortages created for something that apparently doesn't exist. It's going to get a lot worse, theres no lawnmowers, other appliances and basically everything summer related that hadn't been shipped to the stores before they shut everything down. That stock we had is almost gone and it isn't even when we normally start selling these things. The stores are saying they won't have any of that until August as well. I've seen a few freezers advertised for $1,500.00 for something 10 years old. When we run out, people will have no choice but to pay their prices, buying from them you buy as is no matter how much you pay. The freezer might not even be capable of working at all. Like we are, anyone buying from them is stuck with it. Private sales from people's homes have no legal protections at all, and without plugging them in for 24 hours theres no way to know if they are good until then. Greedy people are taking advantage of it. We do what we can for our customers, as a reward, they believe we're ripping them off, $25.00 isn't worth the time and trouble, but it's one less that they can sell for 3 times what we do. These people will drag them out of alleys and sell them as good. To be good in business, it seems to be more profitable when you have no morals at all. I just sit and watch the madness, yes it's fear and loathing in the land of Trump. Actually I'm beginning to suspect this is them buying the next election, they're tossing money around like it's nothing. But enjoy your vacation, it's going to get interesting!
@@laylobinson5839 In the seventies the government became very insistent on everyone getting vaccinated for swine flu, suspiciously insistent. We were vaccinated at factories by the military. They went to schools to vaccinate the children. Personally, I believe it was for something in the germ warfare line. Whatever it was, I haven't had any flu lasting more than ten hours starting about a year after getting that vaccination. Maybe they have something up their sleeve they figure everyone has forgotten about.
Khalid was relieved of his commanding post because the people used to praise him for his constant victories, and Umar the caliph at the time had to remind the people that victory only came from God.
I have read the Muslim Version of all these events and now a neutral version also shows that the Khalid bin Waleed was best General in Muslim history, specially his tactics to cross Syrian desert was a bold move. If Umer didn’t withdraw him from commanding army he might get all of Anatolia in his life.
Yes, khalid aim was Constantinople,,,but Umer made the decision to ban him from any other battle after invading syria.....the reason is khalid was killing most the soldiers of his enemy .....Umer thought that they should be given the chance to convert to islam or pay the tax before they get killed even in the battlefield
The reason Umar ban Khalid was that the Muslims sarted believing that Khalid was invisible and only through him victory must come. Even Umar said that I ban him to remind the Muslims that neither Khalid nor anyone else holds victory. Its Islam that brings victor nobody else.
KAD132 That was not the reason. The Caliph Umar r.a. felt that Muslims had started to see Sayyiduna Khalid r.a. as something of a divine sort due to his brilliance in war, so he wanted to remind the Muslims that victory was ONLY and ONLY through God.
@@quilliamattari2772 - I will forever have difficulty accepting how anyone can see fit to take the command away from a blameless hero after Allah's final Prophet had put him in that position.
@@KAD132 - Khalid was right ! If a soldier opposes you , then he dies. His women and children will have the chance to convert or pay the tax if they choose.
Reports from the soldiers in his army say "There were no two fridays between which we had not won a battle or conqured an area" , his tactic, Fast moving cavalry or what we would call Lightning war
@Raizen Cruer Bro!! how tf is that an excuse? the Arabs were a divided Bedouin nomads up until that point they didn't have hundreds of years of battle experience like the Romans or the Persians
@@dannysa6126 2 weak powers who were still many times wealthier, stronger and experienced than the newly formed Rashidun Caliphate. They were able to assemble gigantic armies which completely outnumbered the Muslim armies. And in the end, they both got smashed.
@محمد العنزي يا متخلف في قائد عسكري في العالم خاض 100 معركه وبجيش صغير وهزم اعظم امبراطويتين في ذالك الوقت في وقت قصير خالد ابن الوليد رضي الله عنه اعظم قائد عرفه التاريخ منذ بدايه البشريه
It’s mind boggling that the most underrated fewer people fought the two superpowers and the Arab rebellious at the same time and won! Even the alliance of the Sassanid and the Romans couldn’t stop them. I am also amazed by the courageous women that stoned their men to return and fight back while they were in a clear disadvantage. It’s nothing less than a miracle!
MUHAMMED (صلى الله عليه وسلم/Salutations and Blessings be upon him), was truly the last prophet and final messenger; He was called the Ameen (trustworthy), and was neither a soothsayer,nor a poet, nor a magician,and nor a madman (ASTAGHFIRULLAH) ! Even what you stated is understated , as those early Arabs Muslims were fighting with much inferior war armors ; They had three things in their favors : 1: faith (Eman) in ALLAH (SWT/ سبحانه وتعالى ) , 2: Being the best fighters of that Era ,3: Their swift mobility
@@TheBarser God is always with us and has never left us, for He has mercy on us, consoles me, gives me of His great bounty and covers me with His mercy. Who are you on the day you speak of God?
@@Nutellafuerst why does the so-called Islamic state kill Muslims than any other people that may because the USA said they created them so you're ignorant slave of the west
@Sam McIntyre Hey Sam Slam Allah A'alik First forgive me if my English is bad Hope you read my words with an open heart I hope from a pure heart guiadnce to me and you and to all mankind. I call you to follow the path of Prophets and their message in beliving in "our true one God". I call you to believe in God who created Adam, Noah, Abraham, Israel, Moses, Jesus and Muhammad (peace be upon them). All these Prophets in all time from Adam to Jesus and ending to muhammed (peace be upon them) their message was "God Lord is One" his majsty name is "Allah" in Arabic or "Elohim" in Hebrew or "God" in English with G capital And Islam is the Arabic word of beliving in this God and follow the path of all these Prophets, The really true God who created the heavens and earth, who created live and death, God who created all creation. I call you my friend to believe in this God, I call you to answer the the Prophets and follow their path in beliving in One True God and this is simply what Islam means. i call you to belive in this fact which is never change starting from Adam the father of mankind and ending with Muhammed the last and final messenger of all mankind. And stop saying that Jesus (peace be upon him) is god !! Jesus (peace be upon him) is just a Prophet and he is simbly an example for Prophets who went before him. Slam :)
Jarlaxle Daerthe god gave you, me and everyone else a choice. If you choose to close your mind and follow the path of disbelief and sins then it’s your fault. God is not cruel or evil no more than a teacher who gives a student who didn’t pass an exam an F, it is the result of your work. and who told you that 99% of humanity is going to hell?
🟨🟨Jesus lived in the region called today Middle east,that's why you should check what historical sources in this region are saying,history is about sources not "theories",Jesus was the Messiah simply a man,a reformer of faith.The majority of people under Romans and then later Byzintines in Syria,Iraq,Egypt,North Africa,part of central Asia and even Goths in Eastern Europe and Spain, and Germanic nations believed in Jesus simply as a prophet of God but Romans and Byzintines under the fast spread of the movement founded by Jesus tried to save the ideology of the impire which is paganism by integrating the new faith into their ideology and this is how "christianity was born" and they forced it on people around the ancient World with persecution,burning religious books and hisorical sources ,all what happened from the 1st century AD till modern era has been about this struggle,nations in what's now called Muslim World and in Spain for some period of time accepted Islam since it's close to their faith and Islam gave them religious freedom and these nations fought with Muslims and this why Islam spread so fast in few years , European nations stood against the Church in Rome and Constantinople but with time the Church was able to spread their political ideology,this period was called the "Darks ages" and it's the Church which made it dark ,later the European renaissace was just an other phase of this struggle. Europeans today have no idea of their true history simply because the "Church" wiped it out .
Envoy: Cesar, good news, bad news. Roman commander : start with the good news?! Envoy : Our army outweighs the Muslims 4 to 1 Commander : and the bad news?! Envoy : Khalid Ibn Elwalid.
@@muhammadeisa1459 No worry man our sources is more reliable than others, and you will agree if you study and understand "mustalah alhadits". If not, yo will only become an ignorant fool.
Lonnell Westbrooks if you believe arab accounts. Statistically its hard to believe that all duels were won by the arabs knowing that persians were better equiped and experienced wariors. Even if you admit that arabs were more determined due to the false belief that one can go to paradise in the battlefield after committing crimes in the name of religion, it is hard to believe that all duels ended in victory for the arabs. Indeed iranians were great warriors. You can look at how iranians perform now a days in wrestling or martial arts to have an idea.
@@raminnawab4530 bro just let it go. If they were great warriors they wouldn't have lost their entire empire to the arab armies, especially being better equipped and experienced, as you said
Liverpool Ynwa well, they had conquered half of the known world for centuries and even up to few years before the arab attack, that is why i say they were great warriors with experience. My point is that the history is written by victors and they tend to exaggerate their own merits ans put down the enemy as worthless.
Rezaul karim khan Oni people say genghis khan was undefeated but he lost a war against his brother so yes, Khalid (Ra) is the only general in recorded history to have died undefeated in battle.
Rezaul karim khan Oni okay I checked it out and you’re right. The others seem to have succeeded in quelling local uprisings and a small amount of battles without defeat. Khalid was, the undefeated conqueror.
@Suspicious Ned Flanders The persians and romans BOTH had an advantage in 1. Numbers 2. Military Experience 3. Wealth 4. Military Equipment 5. Logistics 6. Training 7. Fighting on their own land
Zoroscums suffer from an inferiority complex. That's why they think anything post-Islamic Persia has achieved was because of their ethnicity. What a bunch of diaspora leftovers.
@@ME911119 Well, it's probably not as advantageous as you think. I doubt the level of training and military experience was actually that different. Both Empires were large enough to have to fight different enemy in different fronts while having internal strives at the same time. It is very likely that the training and experience of the troop Roman and Sassanian sent simply could not match the quality of Arabic tribal worriers until the battles in 636. On the top of it, Arabic leadership were simply more talented and daring than Roman and Sassanian.
@Rick K its like not that . there is a full name version that you can search on internet and find but for example avicennas short name was abu ali ibn sina which means abu ali son of sina
Arabian Hejazi knight Khalid Ibn Al Walid: The sword of God. Hejaz History is amazing. The land of Abraham and his first son Ishmael "peace be upon them".
@@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 napoleon and alexander come close also this indian dude whos name i forgot i think it was chandragupta or something like that he was a beast too
Shudhesh Velusamy I’m a gamer that real funny😂 Arab soldier +15% attack when in desert +15%speed when you ride a camel -80% Hp in cold places :( 100% Persistence and determination when your General call Khalid
by far an amazing amazing AMAZING video, as a professor of medieval warfare, this is something people should cherish, I'm going to buy Merch and hand it to my best students because this channel has helped so many of my students enjoy history and look forward to the lessons! Thank you Kings and Generals
@@s.ii.5829 this is what you think i won't argue with you because that is useless you will not believe if i gave 100 evidence because you are mind washed
trust me, when you scroll down on the comment section is all about "Khalid bin Waleed" what a great general and choosed to finally join the Muslims after several encounters fighting against the Muslims, i beleive there must something positively interesting about islam which left that brave heart (Khalid bin Waleed) surrendering...
Battle of yarmouk byzantine empire gatthered all theirs armies approx 250k soldeirs while arab army was only 30k .(allah gives victory to whom he wanted to)
Khalid Ibn Walid is a well known general in islamic history. he was known as the Sword of Allah. although, there were warriors amongst him that did not participate in those battles such as the 4 caliphs. those 4 caliphs, specially Abu Bakr and Omar R.A. fought Khalid in battle (he was not a muslim at that time and the prophet was alive) and he was defeated but not killed. Omar Ibn Afan being the strongest warrior at that time. being a testament in the video, Omar is Indeed feared in his time.
@@diasiqasse6532 wow dude chill, there wasnt a 250k army, for like, ever, until the napoleonic wars, the roman army in yarmouk was more like 70k. Winning such a force is still an awesome feat of khalid as he was outnumbered 2 to 1 but just get your facts straight
I really like the accurate naming of African polities here! Meroe, Makurua, Blyemmes, and Aksum. I know this may seem like a trivial detail to many, but thanks :)
Regarding the Battle of the Chains, you comment that it was unlikely that the Persian soldiers chained themselves together as the Muslim historians claim. Yet, for the final battle of this episode you state without comment that the Persian Immortals chained themselves together.
This was just pure science fiction the 10.000 Immortal Infantry was an Achamenid thing only. The sassanids had immortals but it was a cavalry regiment it was basically the elite of the savaran cavalry.
Was about to write the same comment, he also makes all Muslim or Arab sources seems like untrustworthy while Muslims had something that no other nation had till now and makes their claims the most reliable and trustworthy, it's Hadith sciences and important part of it is (علم الجرح والتعديل) Al Jarh Wa at-Ta'dil and the following copied text will give you a brief about it Ajarhu Wa Ata'deel ( الجرح و التعديل ) is a science of the sciences of Hadith, dealing with identifying the narrators whether they are reliable or not. Ajarh/الجرح is finding a deficiency whether it is in his righteousness (عدالته) or in his accurateness (ضبطه), or in both. Of the deficiency is in his righteousness then the Hadith would fall under Mawdu' (موضوع) and Matrook (متروك). If the deficiency is in his accurateness, then the Hadith will fall under Da'eef, Munkar, Mttarab (مضطرب), Mushaf, Maqloob, and Mudraj (المدرج). Atta'deel, is describing the narrator in His righteousness and accurateness with what is required for accepting his narration. The acceptance of the narration would fall under, Hadith Mutawatir, Saheeh, Hasan, and their types. It's purpose is to keep Islam safe. Ajarh Wa Atta'deel is Fardh Kifayah, which means it is required only on some not all, Fardh Ayn means it is required on all Muslim.
Fun fact about Battle of Yarmouk: The reason Khaled sent his cavalry units to block the path of escape on the final day of the battle is that he received reports from his scouts that a sandstorm is heading north from the dessert. Khaled knew arab bedouins being familiar with navigation through sandstorms would give them a decisive advantage against the Romans which outnumbered them 5 to 1. His strategy was to remain on the defensive until the sandstorm arrived. He knew the Romans could not handle the sandstorm because the wind was blowing in the direction of their faces while it would be to the backs of the Arabs. Once the sandstorm arrived, the Romans were blinded and panicked, and the Arabs went on a killing spree. The Romans that tried to escape through the bridge were met by the cavalry unit that sent them to their maker.
This phenomenon happened also in many others battles ,specially in the Qadasiyya battle,which favored the outnumbered Muslims forces immensely, as it started in the third day ,when QaQa Ben Ameur with 700 troops went undetected through the enemies forces ,in order to kill Rostan and his entourage; The killing of Rostan precipitated the loss of morale in the ranks of the Persians Sassanids Zoroastrians forces!
@@MohsinRaza-uq2ow , JZK for the info. ! I wish I have time to catch on all the intricacies of all the battles,that the early Muslims engaged in ! The SAHABAS (RA رضي الله عنهم ) were developed and trained , and taught discipline and myriads strategies by the last prophet and final messenger(Salutations and Blessings be upon him/صلى الله عليه وسلم ) !
Wow Khalid seems like a great warrior one of the greatest I’m curious because I don’t know much about Muslim history but is there any other great generals, kings warriors, throughout Muslim history just as great or even greater? I would like to learn about these figures I find the historic aspects of the religion very interesting
Salah al deen (saladin) Alp Arslan Mehmet II (the conqueror) Bayezid ( thunder bolt) Suleyman the magnificent Tarik Ibn zeyad Musa Ibn nusair Al walid ibn abd Al malik Muhammad Ibn Al Qasim al thaqafy Oqba ibn nafea Amr ibn al a’as Abo Obayda ibn al jarah Saad ibn aby waqas Al Qa’qa’ ibn amr Youssof ibn tashfeen Abdulrahman I (al dakhil) Abdulrahman II ( al awsat) Abdulrahman III ( al nassir) Al hagib ibn aby A’amer ( al mazur) Berke khan Harun al Rashid Noor el deen mahmoud (zengi/zenki) Baybars Qutuz Osman ertugrul Murad II Malik shah Mahmoud ghazni Babur Aurngzeb alamgir Shah jahan Jalal el din akbar Mansa musa Abdulhamid II .. .. and more
And they started out with crude awful quality weaponry. 😂 Despite neglecting and rejecting all muslim sources no one can refute that Khalid ibn al Walid was the absolute badass, perhaps the only man who rivalled the Great Genghis Khan in terms of military genius.
@@Ashish447 As a fellow Muslim, I feel it is my duty to tell you that he is comparing them in military skill which they both had. Stop being offended by something so small
Kings & Generals I just want to thank you so much for the good work that you do in making these video's they are top-notch - I really appreciate this one it helps answer so many questions.
Khalid bin Walid was the definition of a War machine, he even spoke about his love of being on the battlefield, though I can say much of his bravery came through his faith. In Islam, dying through combat for the sake of the faith is by far one of the most honourable and awarded ways to die.
intense following in faith and ideology can often carry a battle, same way imperial japanese believed in glorious death in battle which made them fight even without proper supply lines or tactics
However he didn't die in battle despite having war scars all over his body, the more you read about him the more you can appreciate what an amazing general he was.
there was a Korean admiral who sank the whole Japanese fleet and did not lose a man, until the last the last battle when he was killed. Khalid reminds me of him.
@@danraf1562 I love how no matter what culture; 90% of the time when a ruler goes "ayyy divine marriage y'all" people start immediately grumbling 😁 seems we humans arent all that bad
Actually they where more of horse nomads, camels were used in long distance travel through the sahara mostly by merchants. Horses are used in battle and arabs at that time had a deep connection with horses.
@@altumurnemtzra2026 I think he's talking about the time when a general of Saad dressed up a bunch of camels to scare off the Persian elephants during the battle of Al Qadissiya. The video mentions it in the last battle.
SECOND SEASON: ua-cam.com/video/baHT2nR5Wr4/v-deo.html
A few notes:
- We have previously covered some of these battles, but the videos have been outdated graphically and we wanted to present a more clear picture. More battles added, while the research is improved. There will be 2 more episodes covering the expansion of the early Muslim state, and these 2 videos will cover events in North Africa, Iran, Central Asia, Spain, France, and Anatolia among others.
- Most of the primary sources of this period are Muslim, but they are largely corroborated by the later Byzantine and Iranian sources.
- Speaking of the Byzantines. We used "Romans" and "Byzantines" interchangeably throughout the video. Some people will not like this, but the words are there to convey meaning and if the meaning is communicated, then we are doing ok.
- Chill.
Thanks for the video
Lol 'Chill'.
"Chill" rekt
As a Muslim I say thank you for these videos during Ramadan
Thank you Kng can't wait for the next episode
“I have fought in so many battles seeking martyrdom that there is no spot in my body left without a scar or a wound made by a spear or sword. And yet here I am, dying on my bed like an old camel.
May the eyes of the cowards never rest”
Khalid Ibn Alwaleed
MrFahad52 رضي الله عنه وارضاه
What a badass.
رضى الله عنه
And he died standing
@@alfatazer_8991 He murdered Christian children.
Can we appreciate that they remake a ton of their old videos instead of just leaving them honestly this is amazing dedication.
Here! Here! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
yep!
don't mind at all
I was planning on re-watcing everything at some point...but this makes things a lot better!
Those videos were briefing but this video contains more detail.
K J I agree.
I am an Ex-Muslim living in Australia and it’s better than the previous muslim country I’ve live in. 😄 (my family migrated)
@@shahdaniel1768 Don't come back please.
Army: 'surrounds the Muslim Army.'
Khalid: "I'm not locked in here with you, you're locked in here with me!"
Then how was the muslim ottoman empires were destoryed by the christian britian empire.
In the end game before the UN and such,the christian armies destroyed and ruled over every muslim empires including even arabia.
Deal with it
@@aswing2706 ? I'm talking about Khalid ibn walid who never lost a battle in his life. Just deal with it
@@aswing2706 Because the Ottomans grew weak by their own mistakes
Also you're speaking outside the topic
@@aswing2706 There is no such thing as a Christian army in this day and age.
@@aswing2706 Lol someone is butthurt 🤭
You will face those men who loves death as you loves your lives.
- Khalid ibn al Waleed 🗡️
He is hero and inspiration for many
@hiooxkrmagkis9323 He was just a Muslim who was fighting for spreading the truth and giving people the opportunity to decide their own religion, not fighting for Yemen or even for the sake of Arabs or Turks.
@@MA-bi4em there are some bad guys in every religion who are fi.ghting just for power, including muslims of course.
but Islam itself is extraordinary, and you become more extraordinary the more you adhere to Islam, and Khalid was one of the extraordinary guys, you can see that through his life story.
@hiooxkrmagkis9323No you are wrong . Quraysh goes back to Adnan son of the prophet Ishmail son of Abraham peace be upon them
mm it's also a honorable lineage but you're wrong. @hiooxkrmagkis9323
Fun fact: Khalid Ibn Al-Walid was never defeated his whole life, even when he fought against Muslims before becoming one!
An absolute genius military leader.
The sword of Allah can't be defeated.
@@elmascapo6588 sword of Allah (Saifullah in arabic) was a name given to Khalid. He never fought in Spain fyi
@@elmascapo6588 are you talking about Al Andalus? They were about 8 centuries ruling that place (711-1492), oh yeah, and many places still carry Islamic names.
@@elmascapo6588 Steamrolled? Lol you took over 700 years to kick us out of there lol, remmber Battle of Sagrajas? It took more time to kick us out of the peninsula than discovering the entire Americas bruh, we Muslims steam rolled you in a few years and it took you over 700 years, so pathetic, you're so pathetic
Is Wallid that hard to type
“No place in my body is without marks or scars , i have fought hundreds of battles and I’m dying like this ?? On my bed?
Khalid ibn alwalid
It is not for the sword of Allah to fall in battle
@@nazeemsultan123 what a great comment
@@nazeemsultan123 Mashallah wa la Hawla wala Qowata Ila Billah
@@worfoz no. He did not have a humiliating death. He died peacefully in his death bed.
@@nazeemsultan123 kinda humiliating for a solider such as himself. Went out with no glory.
Byzantium: I can't beat Sassanid what should I do?
Sassanid: I can't beat Byzantium what should I do!
Rashidun Caliphate: Let me solve this problem...
Yup; when two argue; the third laughs :D proven by history.
Rashidun Caliphate: hold my non-alcoholic beer!
@Sports Ace than the British let me take Jerusalem while at let us dissolve the ottomans
@@serenemountain6769 it was the Abbasid that got crushed by gheghis khan not the Rashiduns
@@serenemountain6769 he destroyed abbasid not Rashidun even thats time abbasaid are weak and very small
Correction: there were a 2 reasons on why Omar relieved Khalid from commanding the Army:
1) A lot of the muslim soldiers started to get the impression that Khalid must be there in order for them to win. Omar wanted to remove this illusion from their heads for their own sake.
2) Khalid wanted to make fast decisions based on his own judgment (Abu Baker granted Khalid the freedom to do so) but Omar wanted to oversee any major movement because he was too careful about Rules of engagements especially after receiving complains from the tribes about Khalid as you mentioned and Omar is known for taking complains seriously and questioning the Commanders, Governors and Businessmen about their Ethics to prevent corruption. Even though Khalid is a righteous man but Omar still does’t like operating in the grey area.
Omar’s Nickname is “Al Farouq” which means the one who distinguish between Right and Wrong in even the tiniest situations.
Theres was absolutely no animosity between them, just a disagreement.
I was looking for this =)
Great analogy.
Actually there are 3 reason
The third is Umar bin Khattab choose abu Ubaidah to be the general because abu Ubaidah is generous and pay attention to the people of the city that defeated, Khalid bin Walid only pay attention in war, Allah know best
Kanz ul Ummal, Volume 5 page 619 Tradition 14091:
Ibn Abi Aun and others narrated that Khalid bin al-Walid claimed that Malik bin Nuwayrah had become Murtad according to the information that he (Khalid) had received. Malik denied this and said: ‘I am a Muslim, I never changed.’ Abu Qutada and Abdullah ibn Umar testified that (Malik is Muslim) but Khalid ordered Dharar bin Al-Auzwar to behead him (Malik). Then Khalid took his (Malik’s) wife. (Umar) said to Abu Bakr: ‘He (Khalid) has performed adultery, you have to stone him’. Abu Bakr said: ‘I can’t stone him; he interpreted hence made a mistake’. (Umar) said: ‘Then dismiss him’. He (Abu Bakr) said: ‘I cannot put the sword back in the sheath'
This video should be titled, "Their army was destroyed but Khalid lost just a few hundred troops"
@J Pweek, Yeah. Khalid bin waleed never lost any battle and he fought more than 100 battles.
Gengis khan lost the battle against his brother. So never stand in this class
@@DisHappah Hahah my friend you are smoking weed. He and his brother had a battle (i.e fight) over his father throne and he lost.
Later on his son had battle (i.e flight) with each other to have the throne which makes his empire very week.
@@DisHappah he was defeated in Kabul, later losing after animosity ensued inside muslim army , so that's one defeat to gingis army in his life , a decisive defeat.
Later , the mongol were annihilated starting from qutuz mamluk , who deployed their own tactics and were higher in discipline, then Baybars the memluk lion decimated mongol stronghold on middle east and anatolia over 33 years sweeping the area clean of them .
People who hate muslim prowess and valor , say the elections of Khan Khanate saved the world from their conquest , stands not true , in Europe they already won the two well known powers, Hungary and Russia .
In Muslim lands ,yet , the memluk were the most powerful power in the east , more to your dismay , they literally ended the Mongolian invasion , a type of people who never let go of losing battle without retribution , after the no. 1 world power established itself , they were annihilated and bit away to bitter losses, they just don't say it , because it doesn't suit them
@@DisHappah which one stands out a lie to you ? The defeat gingis army encountered at Kabul in afghanistan , the later win he got from the divided muslim army that just bashed him previously?
Or the change of events starting from the glorious win in ain jalut on qutuz hands ? The ensuing chain of wars to retaliate that defeat , which down played to keep the won lands , which downplayed again to run for their lives and leaving Syria, Iraq, turkey and half of Iran free from mongol control for good , on the hands of ferocious Baybars For 33 years ?
Which one , exactly , stands out as a lie ? Or is it what I explained before hand, disheartening hatred towards Islamic achievements , even if it meant saving the world from brutal blood lusting , not convinced except by sword, arrogant people !!
FYI, Khalid and Omar didn't have any animosity between each other. Omar received Khalid because he was worried that people were crediting the the victories of the Muslims to Khalid's leadership instead of to Allah. He demoted Khalid to signal the Muslim's success didn't come from a single man but from God.
Khalid also didn't stop fighting, he just re-enlisted as a foot soldier and kept fighting the good fight.
@X M16 what a nobel cursade you do. you fail to defend your religions with reason so you just curse and spread some lies. what a strategy
X M16 =💩💩💩
Thank you..
Master kenobi...
@X M16 your emogy is not worth it
@X M16 pajeet detected
Guys believe or not.. I was living in the same neighborhood as the grave of Khaled Ibn Al-Walid in Homs. The neighborhood called “alkhalidia” and i used to visit him almost everyday when i was going to school. That was before the war in Syria
May Allah help Syria, I hope the war ends soon, and stability returns to the Middle East. Honestly, I envy you for being able to visit the grave of one of the greatest commanders in history.
رحم الله خالد بن الوليد
@RD Do
The word " sword" was mentioned 200 times in the bible, in Koran non .
And the sword is used to peel potatoes
@RD Do ok , so the 30 million africans were captured enslaved and transported to americas by muslims ?
Estimates of the number killed by the Spanish Inquisition, which Sixtus IV authorised in a papal bull in 1478, have ranged from 30,000 to 300,000. Some historians are convinced that millions died.
in my country In 2017, the Algerian League for the Defense of Human Rights, an NGO, estimated that the victims of the French colonial rule at over 10 million from 1830 to 1962 .not mentioning 17 nuclear boms experiments .
please don t tell me our religion is violent
@RD Do Iraq and Afghanistan war started by the US where millions died and millions more are displaced was started because of christianity. Bush said that "God" told him to invade Iraq and Afghanistan. Not to mention the DOD was given the president defense reports littered with biblical verses complimenting pictures of the previous days war efforts.
Also, dont forget the last words of the bombing crew that dropped two nuclear bombs that killed millions in japan: "In jesus's name amen"
Now, reverse the situation and imagine if a Muslim leader said that "Allah" told him to invade two countries in lets say Europe and the defense department of his country were giving him reports filled with Quranic verses with pictures of the war.
Or lets say a bombing crew of a Muslim country (for example pakistan) ends their prayer with "In Allah's name ameen" before heading to their bombers to drop two nukes in a european country.
How much would you lose your mind and start going apeshit about it?
keep in mind this is all recently in the modern era. NOT the medieval or pre-medieval era.
Romans: we have a Persians problem
Persians: we have a Romans problem
Khalid Ibn Alwalid: I can solve all your problems
Arab : we have a Persian problem
Arab : we have Roman problem
Changeiz Khan Mogual : I can solve all your problem
@@hamidtabrizi7028 do you know Seif El-Din Qutuz
@@hamidtabrizi7028 do u know who is rokon ad din bibers
@@hamidtabrizi7028 Ha-ha-ha-ha, Genghis Khan failed. He did not fight the Arabs. He died before they reached Baghdad, and no one could stop the Mongols except Muslims.
@@hassanhlfawi8129 yes but it caused much damage to the muslim empire. such as khwarezmians etc
The reason Omar Bin Al-Khatab changed leadership from Khalid to Abu Obaida was because most of the major victories were under Khalid's lead and he didn't want soldiers to develop the believe that victory comes because of Khalid's leadership only leading to a major loss of moral in case of his death, and to show them that it was the sincerity and sheer devotion of the soldiers that brought victory no matter who leads.
@ali bazzi i ithink so he waas jelous about khaalid
@ali bazzi umar never envy with his cousin. Yes khalid al walid his cousin. Umar al khattab have more power than khalid al walid.
@ali bazzi if umar is power hungry why he live in poverty? He is muslim leader yet he choice to be poor and live in paycheck.
Calling a sahabas jealous? i don't know what you people are but you are certainly not muslims
@@aamirbatatawala3041 i think they are shia. Just let them Clout chase. They are Haters of the Sahaba so dont take them Serious
Khalid ibn alwaleed, the most underrated general of all time!! What a genius!!
better to be underrated than to be over rated
it is underrated for Western as they think about their own History only , And we damn care about their History and what they think , Khalid Ibn Walid R.A is a household name in every Muslims house , We named Our Children Khalid
Khalid is one of the GOAT generals. But Westerners with an anti-Islam agenda refuse to acknowledge it.
@@smellypatel5272 snowflake
Sword of god 🗡
Never defeated , all victories , non have killed him , he broke and have destroyed two large empires ( Romans and Persians ) at once
Yes was truth what the prophet said : Khalid is the sword of Allah ..!
And that’s a miracle , because if he is really the sword of Allah he should never be beaten ! And it was 😎♥️😊 miracle
Khalid Ibn Walid is like that fantasy character who never loses a battle and wins a 100 battle, except that he's real
He’s a character you unlock after putting in cheat codes
@@sherifnabil9663 Lol still asthaghfirullah as he was a Suhabbi
Go see Imam Ali Ibn Abi Talib , he’s never lost a battle .
@@nadjiguemarful but Hannibal lost the battle of Zama and failed to conquer Rome (even tho its Carthage fault for not sending reinforcements)
@@nadjiguemarful they didnt even send reinforcements to his father in Iberia. Why should I read up more?? Who are you even??? You don't know me??
Khalid ibn al waleed was an amazing man
He would spend all his day in the battle field and all his night worshiping Allah.
That’s one side of the muslim personnality that wasn’t mentioned in this beautiful documentary.
Thank you
The enemy: *Out number Khalid by 3 to 1*
Khalid: Then it is an even fight.
was looking for this comment, didn't get disappointed 😆
Walid "Perfectly balanced as all things should be"
then he was sacked and the muslims lost battles
@@Enraged-vu2vb
First he was demoted
Second the battle of kadissiya that ended the sassanid empire was won without him as a leader
@@Enraged-vu2vb ah i see that hate of yours ... Well khaled never lost a battle so u calm yourself ur opinion is worthless cuz his action speaks for him a great general with unique understanding of warfare tactics and fighting skills
Such an unique start of a religion, challenged 2 big powers to war at the start of it expansion. Even demanding the leaders of those empires to convert.
Khalid Ibn Walid though, he probably one of the best commander in history.
reed more about that theres much more infos in books than in this video 👍wish you the best
Actually they already know they’re going to take down the 2 big empires , because prophet Mohammed prophesied it, when the muslims were in makkah surrounded by quraish pagan tribe, muslims were weak at that point and lesser numbers , even the companions said to themselves how we gonna do it?? But yet nothing is hard for allah the almighty.
@Mo Mo what sources?
@Mo Mo
المصدر : صحيح النسائي
@Mo Mo
@RD Do it was always the religion of peace for people who want peace , for what god say :-
AND FIGHT in God's cause against those who wage war against you, but do not commit aggression-for, verily, God does not love aggressors.
Arab scout: we are outnumbered 3 to 1 and two more enemy armies marching towards us
khalid: seems like a fair play....
im dead
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Mandalorian vibes...
@Winston Maraj 20 to 1 ?
Usa , Europe, zionist billionaire companies are joke to you ?
@Winston Maraj boi stop crying in every comment .. you are bragging by wins in 6 days ? .. yeah but we won in 6 hours in 1973 LOL .. we literally crashed your parleef wall "which you was calling it the strongest defence in the world" with fckin water hoses man wtf are you talking about
The most fascinating about Khaled is that he came from desert land and never went to war college or study tactics in school, he was born as great general
He is persian, who understand war more than arab people that day.
@@sikanciltaubat6581 كذبة خالد ابن الوليد عربي
@@sikanciltaubat6581 خالد عربي وليس فارسي
@@sikanciltaubat6581 انه عربي وليس فارسي يا متغلف
@@sikanciltaubat6581 he was straight out of Arabia. From the Quraysh tribe of Mecca
Khalid's troops: 15000
Enemy troops: 50000
Khalid: finally, a worthy opponent! Our battle will be legendary!
@@unitedstateofearth5265
It's universally known that Rashidun scribes stupidly inflate and exaggerate enemy numbers to make their generals appear miraculous. If you really believe that those numbers you mentioned are accurate, well history is not for you.
@@julesbrags1661 Is that what you tell yourself every night crying to sleep in fear of having caliphate nightmares
@Matricx700
Exactly, those inflated numbers does more in delegitimizing their feats than making them greater.
@K Lmao just because romans and other competitors can't match that doesn't mean it's not true. Sorry to burst your bubble son.
@@RockLeeKait
You're not busting anyone's bubble in your own fantasy world you troglodyte.
"May the eyes of cowards never sleep"
-Khalid ibn al waleed
Edit: wow never expected a war out here+958 likes
Edit 2: I think u should go read the replies. They're litteraly so amusing
He famously said this quote on his death bed
well, he is long dead, was probably kicked out of Jannat for so much killing, but then Islam rewards for murders.
@@6507353 you don't understand islam ok
@@6507353 You don't understand Islam, so don't say this, he made this killing in Jihad, but not as a blood thirst.
@@6507353 he fought for Islam m8, also many of your Christian kings also killed many people, but, then again, Jesus forgives all sins so they will go to heaven 😂
Bloody hell... khalid is a absolute monster. I’ve heard he was an excellent general but i wasn’t expecting this level of tactical brilliance.
Both empires despite being battered by wars with one another are still able to recruit massive armies to strike back at the muslims yet khalid just kept on winning.
Khalid might even give caesar or hannibal a run for their money. Forget saladin, this might just be one of the greatest muslims commanders yet!
He is honestly in my opinion the best commander ever. I think his record has zero losses. All the other contenders were eventually defeated or killed while he died on his bed wishing to have died on the battlefield
@@omayah Best out of Muslim commanders or all time? Alexander the Great was never defeated.
@@J.R.Penrice I would say best of all time not only among Muslim commanders, based on his numbers. Alexander has actually been defeated in India.
Greco Cabanero i read about it and it seemed that either he was defeated (not exactly though) or he won a hard victory. I think its the latter. This can make sense about the mutiny because usually soldiers actually get wealth and power after wars if they are winning decisively. If they are not, they mutiny. I think that what happened
@@J.R.Penrice yeah Alexander was also undefeated but Khalid was also a great administrator. Observe how he stopped after every successful conquest of a city to establish a tax base and a supplies, appoint governor's etc. Alexander conquered for the sake of conquest. He died and so did his empire.
When Muslims were very few in numbers and were facing an attack from Meccans, Muhammad (pbuh) prophesized that the key to Yemen, Persia, Rome was given to him. He also prophesized that Muslims will conquer Egypt. And all of it were conquered by Muslims within just a span of few years.
Al-Barā’ ibn ‘Āzib (rA) reports that while digging the trench outside Madinah to repel an approaching army, a massive boulder obstructed them and no ax could break it. With time running out, and with people’s fears and hunger growing, the Prophet ﷺ walked over and picked up the ax. He said, “Bismillāh (In God’s name),” and hammered the boulder, reducing a chunk of it to rubble. He said, “Allāhu Akbar (God is Great)! I have been given the keys to Shām; I can see its red palaces at this very moment.” Then he shattered another chunk and said, “Allāhu Akbar! I have been given the keys to Persia; I can see Madain’s white palace.” Then he shattered the last chunk and said, “Allāhu Akbar! I have been given the keys to Yemen. By Allah, I can see the Gates of Sanaa at this very moment from here.”
Regarding Egypt, he ﷺ took its conquest for granted, knowing his Lord’s promise was true. Abū Dharr (rA) narrated: The Prophet ﷺ said:
“You will certainly conquer Egypt, a land in which [a currency called] al-qīrāṭ is customary. When you conquer it, be gracious to its people, for they are entitled to a covenant and [the right of] family bonds. And when you see two men disputing over the place of a brick, then leave [Egypt].”
How peacefull
@@CatholicCrusaderofYeshua You decided to completely ignore the fact this is a mind-blowing prophecy which came true.
And you also decided to completely ignore the fact that the bible is full of violence.
If you are a truth seeker destroy your own bias first.
@@linkon9828 Sure, keep justifying occupation and conquest cry later about palestine
@@CatholicCrusaderofYeshua
Prophet Muhammad forbade the ki...ing of woman, children, animals. Even destroying crops is forbidden. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) also prophesied the sufferings of Muslims today. He said, "‘The nations will summon each other upon you as you call guests to eat from a plate of food,’ they said ‘Will we be few in number on that day O Messenger of God?’ He said, ‘No, rather you will be many on that day, but you will be [disunited and weak] like the foam on the ocean. And God will remove the fear in the hearts of your enemies and place in your hearts al-wahan.’ They said, ‘What is al-wahan O Messenger of God?’ He said, ‘Love of this world and hatred of death.’ "
--------------------------
If I condemn occupation and conquest it will stop America, Israel and the West from invading us, right? Actually we see the opposite from the history. Since Muslims have become coward and stopped fighting the injustice upon them only increased.
Today we are crying helplessly. We are begging others not to k...ll our children. Did it stop the Christians and the Jews? No, and it never will.
If history taught me a thing, it would be..
- Do not invade russia in winter.
- Do not challange an arab in a sword duel.
@Evilpimp a muslim who fight in the name of allah every week during 30 years : EZ
@@amaterasu6888 Nah. Even if I’m a muslim, I don’t think, the master of the Katana would fail in 1vs1. Maybe an army, that is clever and strategically strong could win against an army full of Samurais.
@@alperenk6889The Muslim could beat the samurai but the Muslim would be very strong with his sword but the samurai is very agile
they always argue that the only rival for Japanese Samurai was a Knight wielding a Longsword, but after study history closely, I seriously think that an Arab wielding Shamshir that fight in the name of God is the true rival for Japanese Samurai (this documentary even support Muslim/Arab Claim, they hardly lost any duel)
@@paanbon6543 wow, I didn’t know that! Thanks👍
Khalid was a legendary General didn't know this much about him before thanks
The sword of Islam 🗡 without DJ Khalid the Arabs wouldn’t have been nearly as successful in breaking the backs of both the Sassanids and the Romans.
@@C0wb0yBebop Don't put DJ with his name 😡. He lead more than 50 battles as general in his lifetime and never lost even a single one. He was nicknamed "Saif-ullah" by the Prophet (P.B.U.H) which means Sword of God. Music is not considered good in Islam so putting DJ with his name is disrespectful, I hope you understand.
@hiOOxkr magkis He didn't only kill people he did great things aswel, why are you shitting on west while someone praises Muslim warlord? also Alexander the Great is mentioned in Quran aswel and not as a mass murderer
@@yasinibrahim But It's considered isn't it?
Dulkarnayn is said to be the Persian king Cyrus the great not Alexander who was confirmed to be bisexual . God would never chose such a sinner as his prophet
I can watch this for free on yt, what a time to be alive
Indeed. And looking from our end, we have an ability to broadcast it to millions.
@@KingsandGenerals thank you so much for the effort!
Well said man! Kings and Generals thank you for such a beautiful work and great content.
“You will have only yourself to blame for the consequences, for I bring the men who desire death as ardently as you desire life."
Khalid ibn al-Walid
Such a great man and a great religion. What wisdom.
Fun fact: The title of "Caliph" means successor, steward or deputy and it stems from the Arabic word "Khalifa" which means successor or ruler. So Abu Bakr by taking on the tile of "Caliph" symbolically signaled that Muhammad was still the true leader of the Islamic faith and he was only acting in accordance to Muhammad and by extension Allah's will.
tsk tsk tsk ,, 😷😷😷😷
„Khalifa“ is short for „khalifat Allah“ and means „representative (of God)“. That was the title of all Muslim Caliphs until al-Mamun. Only then it was changed to „khalifat Rasul Allah“, „representative of the messenger of God“. See also the book „God‘s Caliph“ by Danish professor Patricia Crone.
@@Spitamenes There's also the less talked about but still historically significant title of "Wahalimarti Khalifat" roughly translating to "Walmart manager" in english. During the 21st century they established themselves as rulers of rural America. In many ways they mirror their Rashidun ancestors in their talent for trade and their swift though often brutal conquests...
@@Spitamenes well, khalifa "خليفة" in Arabic literally means successor not Representative, so it couldn't be representative (of God),
Amr Farouk That may be its meaning today, but 1400 years ago it was more or less „representative“. In the Quran itself (2:30) the word is used to describe Adam as the representative of God on Earth. Adam could hardly be Godˋs successor. That‘s also why the Shia still consider their Imams „khalifat Allah“, representatives of God, preserving an original Islamic concept that has been lost in Sunniism.
Kings and generals spoiling us this quarantine
As Khalid did
@@anasevi9456 read history Theophanes the byzantine historyan says their number is around 80,000- 140,000 so byzantine are outnumber thats not lie
you are 100% right ! Muslim history is very Rich!
@Gazi Arian Ahmed Yes, our numeric system came from the Islamic Golden Age : ) among other things ... Credit is due ,where Credit is due!
@@anasevi9456 I've got ocean front property in Arizona
Sassanid general: It's time to DUEL!
Khalid Ibn el Walid: I'm about to end this man's whole career.
Literary ..
😭😭😭
Whole life*
Rising of the desert cult
Only cus both Empires had been completely militarily exhausted on both sides by 500 years of non stop warfare lmao
The strategy at 36:00 is one of the most incredible I have heard of in warfare history.
Imagine, dividing your army into 3 factions, maneuvering and getting them past enemy lines, to all meet up at the same time at the designated target location.
In the age of information, I can't even navigate my own city without using a GPS when I am going out for a drive.
It blows my mind the ingenuity and sheer brilliance executing this task!
Khalid was truly one of the greatest generals in history!
Marvelous!
Totally agree 💯 unpredictable and perfectly executed
there is an historian called roy Casagranda who said exactly the same thing (about this exact same event using the example of the GPS in modern times !) ! Yes really Khalid ibn al walid and the rashidun caliphate in general were outstanding exceptions in history.
Take a shot everytime someone takes the Persian throne.
I'll be as dead as all of them. lol
*Persian throne exists*
Everyone else : 'Its free real estate'
Zoroscums weren't so bright.
@@tasinal-hassan8268 No, Zoroastrians definitely didn't controll Middle East and much of the Arabian Panninsula for centuries. And the Library at Ctesiphon, built by Zoroastrian emperor Khosrou Anushirvan definitely wasn't the main inspiration for the House of Wisdom. And Zoroastrians definitely didn't play a major role in both Caliphate administration and the Islamic Golden Age (the translation movement). Definitely they weren't as bright as the enlightened Muslims. Believe what you want and lie to yourself, but lemme quote one of your caliphs:
"The Persians ruled for a thousand years and did not need us Arabs even for a day. We have been ruling them for one or two centuries and cannot do without them for an hour."
~Abbasid Caliph, Al-Ma'mun
@Warmessage Cyrus the Great was not a Zoroscum. He was a monotheist,and he married a Jew. He's one of the candidates for Dhul Qarnayn. But otherwise, you're right.
here i was thinking about how roman civil wars were a mess, and this persian one made the year of four emperors look like childplay
Eric Da Silva Ferreira True 😅
History is full of such stories
Eric Da Silva Ferreira very true
Incredible how a single civil war can have huge effects and led to the end of a 400 years old empire.
Ultimately there was a betrayal by the Parthian clans amongst the 7 that led to the fall of the Empire. They refused to back Yazdegerd after Nahavand and made separate peace with the arabs and were complicit in the murder of Yazdegerd .
عظیم عرب جنگجو اور صحابی رسول صلی اللّٰہ صلی علیہ السلام۔ اللہ تعالیٰ ان کے درجات بلند کرے آمین
Man Khalid Ibn Walid deserves to be known more about in the west. I never hear of him. He was personally pretty badass fighting duels and on the frontlines with his men and his tactics are like, one level below Caesar himself in terms of how high-risk high-reward they were, he was definitely extremely daring as a general.
Yes he is Before he accept Islam he also once defeat the Muslim in war before the sign of peace treaty done by Medina people and Mecca Pagans.
@Ali Kareem Neamah Hmm same as Umar Al-Khattab everyone fear him so I guess Umar is one of the best warrior.
Exactely bro, i swear im not saying it cse im Muslim too but the man is a genius, i wrote this genius and i know im not giving him the recognzation he deserves, he is among the 5 best in the history of warfare, but he got somth none ever had as a leader, throwing himself in front lines, challenging commanders, he sacrificed himself before his soldiers! I never read of a leader or commander ever doing this, they were like him big tacticians, geniuses, braves, but none of em sacrificed themselves as he did, and what blows the mind more is to know that he died in his bed a normal death!
Really "no woman is capable to give birth to another Khalid" -Caliph Omar
Ceasar had a well equipped and trained roman military machine behind him and fought mostly inferior troops. While Khalid bin walid had inferior numbers, inferior quality of equiptment and an infant state to support him but he still managed to bring two empires to their knees.
@@akiburrahman314 Caesar fought Pompei, another roman. Also, both the Byzantines and Sassinids were in terrible condition when the Arabs invaded. it's not as simple as just saying "Persians and Romans" and then assuming they were always well trained and in amazing spirit the way we remember them. Also Caesar also had inferior numbers.
So to resume all of this Khalid can take a few guys, few camels, few horses and destroy empires. Now that’s IMPRESSIVE. An even better one how often do you hear in this video Khalid was outnumbered so Khalid devised a plan. LEGENDARY.
Not simple as that
i beg to differ with maximo he is currently oone of the greatest generals of history greater than frederick the great of course he still loses to mr takeda shingen mr wellington and mr napoleon bonaparte the greatest general in history(although we can maybe put yi sun sin somewhere on the list since he was the god of the seas like amazing fights seriously)
@@elmascapo6588 its like comparing a freshly made bicycle with a 25 years worn out ferrari
@@elmascapo6588 The Arab tribes were also fighting each other
@@asmrnaturecat984 This makes no sense since the Muslims themselves came out of their own civil war. When the likes of Jordan Peterson mentioned paraphrased "no scholars understand how it was done" cuz of how wild and unprecedented it was, who are you to make an lame comparison like that?
can't believe i sat through this 2 hour masterpiece.
very well explained and visualized, great work
"I would throw myself into the ranks of the enemies until I was certain I would not come out alive." - Khalid Bin Al-Waleed R.A.
@marouane Attahali exactly, I noticed that too many times.
@marouane Attahali you are right howevrr he did say the arabs had more mobility and less armour. The persian army was heavy armoured and are not used to hot desert weather like khalids beduin army also their clothing added to their heavy armour didn’t help hence why I believe this to be true they were more fatigued then the arab army
@marouane Attahali thats the reason why khalid always chose to fight with the desert to his back. But the reasons you mentioned is exactly why the muslim army was more comfortable and more mobile. Yes they lived on dates and water which made supply easier and less heavy than their persian counter parts. Less armour made them more mobile and less tired in the desert than persians who are not used to the desert.
@marouane Attahali It depends hannibals army in cannae was less armoured than the romans but other factors played in. Yes the favour in terms of arms was im the hands of the persian but in terms of terrain was for the muslims more mobile and less armour means faster movement and less fatigue its very logical?..
may the eyes of the coward never sleep. Khalid ibn Alwaleed
"You can't just take a walled city without siege equipments"
Khalid ibn Alwalid: Observe.
Improvise, Adapt, overcome
Holy Prophet gave him the title Sword of Allah. He never lost a battle since
@@ahmadhassan8466 lol
that's when you play Total War and if you have no siege weapons you win when choosing the 'autoresolve battle' option.
To be fair, it was partially thanks to that guy that was upset by his wedding. But kudos to him for listening to that raving lunatic lol.
Im Egyptian muslim and i find this content very fair like many other contents.
You deserve the Oscar of online content for such a channel.
Khalid Ibn Al-Walid inherited his fathers wealth, who was the wealthiest man among all Arabs, yet him and his two brothers, Hesham and Al-Walid give it all away for the sake of spreading the new religion Islam. He was named (The sword of Allah) by prophet Mohamed peace be upon him and maybe be he didn't die fighting because the sword of Allah can't be broken. Became the Emir of Muslim armies and died leaving behind only his sword and horse. if i have a boy ill name his Khalid without doubt.
One thing tho, the sword of Allah SWT was Imam Ali A.S
So u mean to spread a religion or change a person's perspective to the creator u have to brutally conquest that area 🙄
@@rahulchavan4088well… that tends to be how that worked. Both Christianity and Islam have very long histories of military conquests, persecution of religious minorities, and forced conversions. They are also the largest religions today so those tactics clearly worked haha
Umar RA relieved Khalid RA because people increasingly started to put their faith in him and Umar RA believed that this weakened their faith in Allah. It was not out of any personal animosity. These caliphs were not typical monarchs, but spiritual leaders as well.
So Umar (RA) showed the people that the victories were from Allah, hence strengthening their faith.
Exactly Bro.. ❤️
It's the wrong decision, although I love 💘 umar, what you forget is that the Noble prophet Muhammad s.a.w) and Abu bakr would never have demoted him, sword of Allah, remember..
@Rashid...it would have no worries if Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was alive but he was not. Omar was worried Khalid (ra )would have been treated like how Shia treats Ali (ra)right now
It's questionable for me, Why did the Arab Nations call 'Khalid bin Waleed' a "Hero"?
'Khalid ibn Walid' was from the 'Bani Makhzum' tribe of the 'Quraysh' tribe (Of the 29 battles of the Prophet Muhammad, 12 was against the Quraysh tribe. The Quraysh tribe was one of the Arab tribes of Hejaz.) His father, 'Walid ibn Mughira', was one of The most stubborn enemies of Islam. 'Khalid ibn Walid' was one of the 'Quraysh' allies who had the "position of the Dome," meaning the arsenal and ammunition, as well as the position of head of the 'Quraysh' army. He was one of the commanders of the polytheists (pagan) in the battle of 'Uhud' Against Islam and one of the causes of the defeat of the Islamic army in that battle. He took part in all the pagan wars "against" the 'Prophet Muhammad', After (bayʻat ar-riḍwān), they united.
In the case of the Massacre and looting 'Malik bin Noireh' Arab tribe, After Massacre 'Khalid' killed 'Malik ibn Nuwayrah' while he was (an Arab and Muslim) then raped his wife that night, and put Malik's head in a pot of food and cooked it! had also committed adultery. also, the Massacres and looting Muslims of the 'Jazima' Arab tribes (The way it was fought was also cowardly, This is another story).
in the battle of 'Ullais', 'Khalid Ibn Walid' said if they could defeat the "Sassanid" army in the battle of 'Ullais' (the Ullais region in the al-Badiyah area near the Euphrates River, 633 AD in Iraq), "I paint the river red with their blood" and because the 'Sasanian' Army was defeated( Coup in the Sasanian capital, This is another story); By order of 'Khalid', the people of the city (They were of Arab descent), all of them (Anyone who could not escape the city, children, women, old men) taken captive, By order Khalid They beheaded them And their blood was shed in the river.
'al-Mughira ibn Shu'ba' says" There were mills along the river, by order 'Khalid' They made flour with bloody water for three days and prepared food for the army of 18,000 or more. The dead in 'Ellis' was forty or seventy thousand people.
'Khalid bin Waleed' committed war crimes. he is the butcher of a lot of Arab people (Muslims and non-Muslims). According to Shari'a Law, They should have executed 'Khalid bin Walid'. For political reasons 'Prophet Muhammad' covered 'Khalid' sins And crimes because he needed his services. Actually 'Prophet Muhammad' was a partner in the sins of 'Khalid ibn Walid'.
for example, 'Amr' (second caliph), strongly objected to him, called him an enemy of God, and swore that he would kill 'Khalid'. (throwing stones at his head until he died). But since 'Abu Bakr' (first caliph) desperately needed Khalid's powerful army to advance his rule, he defended him and did not impose any punishment on him.
.
In fact, 'Khalid bin Waleed' was a criminal Mercenary in the service of Islam so that Islam could grow and spread with the help of his sword. With this description, 'Khalid bin Waleed' cannot be called a "Hero".
If you look in history books, you will see many such acts. Some audiences criticize what I have mentioned above and deny it, Some people also said that Khalid bin Waleed became a Muslim and all his sins were forgiven by God. I must say that we are not talking about supernatural matters, for this reason, I mention to reference:
I have translated the source address into Arabic to make your work easier, Please check again, And please read history without religious prejudice:
.Reference:
(History of Ya'qubi, vol. 2, pp. 110 and Al-Ghadir, vol. 7, pp. 158-166; Complete, vol. 2, p. 137; Tabari, vol. 2, p. 503; Beginning and end, vol. 6, p. 322-279)
(Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari; Volume 4)
(Ten thousand-year histories of Iran; Volume 2)
(Tabari volumes 3 and 4;)
(The Book of the Prophet's Wars; Muhammad ibn Amr Al-Waqidi; Volumes 1, 2 and 3;)
(The book of the character of the Messenger of God; Ibn Hisham Volume 2.)
.
اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 5 صفحة : 160
اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الطبري تاريخ الرسل والملوك وصله تاريخ الطبري ، مؤلف : الطبري، ابن جرير المجلد : 3 صفحة : 67
اسم الكتاب : القرآن شعراء/سوره26، آیه216
اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 5 صفحة : 160
اسم الكتاب : السيرة النبوية - ط مكتبة محمد علي صبيح وأولاده ، مؤلف : ابن هشام الحميري المجلد : 4 صفحة : 883
اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 8 صفحة : 74
اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 9 صفحة : 73
اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الطبري تاريخ الرسل والملوك وصله تاريخ الطبري ، مؤلف : الطبري، ابن جرير المجلد : 3 صفحة : 280
اسم الكتاب : الاغانی ، مؤلف : ابو الفرج الإصفهاني المجلد : 15 صفحة : 203
اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الإسلام - ت بشار ، مؤلف : الذهبي، شمس الدين المجلد: 2 صفحة : 24
اسم الكتاب : المختصر في اخبار البشر ، مؤلف : أبو الفداء المجلد : 1 صفحة : 158
اسم الكتاب : وفيات الأعيان ، مؤلف : ابن خلكان المجلد : 6 صفحة : 14
اسم الكتاب : مراه الجنان وعبره اليقظان ، مؤلف : اليافعي المجلد : 2 صفحة : 90
اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الإسلام - ت بشار ، مؤلف : الذهبي، شمس الدين المجلد : 2 صفحة : 24
اسم الكتاب : كنز العمال ، مؤلف : المتقي الهندي المجلد : 5 صفحة : 619
اسم الكتاب : جامع الأحاديث ، مؤلف : السيوطي، جلال الدين المجلد : 24 صفحة : 433
اسم الكتاب : المختصر في اخبار البشر ، مؤلف : أبو الفداء المجلد : 1 صفحة : 158
اسم الكتاب : وفيات الأعيان ، مؤلف : ابن خلكان المجلد : 6 صفحة : 15
اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الإسلام - ت بشار ، مؤلف : الذهبي، شمس الدين المجلد : 2 صفحة : 24
اسم الكتاب : الکامل فی التاریخ ، مؤلف : ابناثیر عزالدین ابوالحسن علی بن محمد جزری شیبانی المجلد: 2 صفحة : 217
اسم الكتاب : نهایة الارب فی فنون الادب ، مؤلف : النویری المجلد: 19، صفحة : 52
@@samiedi4134 you don’t even know the basics of becoming a muslim and you are trying hard to slander our religion. Our prophet Muhammad (PBUH) did not cover Khalid’s sins, Allah covered him. In Islam, if non believer becomes a believer, he becomes like a baby that’s born and all his past sins are forgiven, even if he committed a genocide. That is the benefits of those who were not born in islam and find their way gets.
The Sassanian court intrigue makes GoT look like a Disney movie,
@Александр okay sure buddy
@Александр First seasons werent.
@@abdelrahmanwasea5065 yeah mumluk dynasty was amazing .... and the important thing was the slaves became the kings
And the sex! Never forget the xwedodah
Александр GoT was good and deserved the praise it got until season 7 from there it went downhill ruining the the whole series
Many people forget Abu ubaidah in the shadow of Khalid but Abu unbaidah was a wise brave and patient leader and played one the greatest if not the greatest role in the Levant conquests
One of the 10 promised paradise and told by Prophet Muhammad(S.A.W) to be the most trustworthy of his ummah.
Hazrat Abu Ubaidah ibn al jarrah
If i ain't wrong
He is one of
Ashrae mubashra ...
@@neanderthal9621 yes he is one of the ten blessed companions subhanallah
Abu Ubaidah was put into a tough position. While a good commander, he knew Khalid was most likely a better field commander than him. Giving Khalid field command at Yarmouk was a great command decision.
@@infinitecontent8001 yes , but I think it wasn’t a tough decision Khalid was the best general and Abu ubaidah was the overall commander , i think Khalid was the best general and Abu ubaidah was a better govenor and administrator he was called the trustworthy for a reason , thank you
Khalid ibn alwaleed is arguably the greatest war strategist of recorded history
He;s up there with Napoleon and Admiral Yi!
😂😂
Impressive. But a bit of a one-trick pony.
@@henghistbluetooth7882if it wins it wins 🤷♂️
Also undefeated in his duelling against Arabs, Sassinids and Romans, and a known frontliner. He is unmatched
when they block your trade-routes so you take half their empire
This saying can also apply to hannibals conquests
😂😂
big moves from Khalid bin waleed
Ha ha ha
When promise had been broken, no mercy for u
No joke i didn't know about the existence of any of these people and now I feel ready to conquer half a continent.
ps4 or ps5?
@@justworship0570 lelelelelel
You can only play Total war on PC
everyone is gangstar till khalid ibn alwalid emerges from the desert
Just hear his name.
@Tattle Boad what a strange conclusion of this conversation.
@Tattle Boad Isn't Qatar one of the richest countries in the world?
Indeed
ever heard of vald te empaler haha
Outstanding documentary! One person appears to be a real life super hero, that’s Khalid ibn al-walid! One of the greatest of all time.
Your PFP ❤❤❤ thundercats
If your superheroes impose their religions on others, destroy their cities and populations, send tens of thousands into slavery etc. Etc. Don’t remember Superman ever doing that :)
@@henghistbluetooth7882Depends on what side is viewing him. But yes, he can be called a hero.
@@henghistbluetooth7882he didn’t impose his religion on anyone. If they chose not to convert then surrender and pay Jeziyah
@@henghistbluetooth7882
He was indeed a superhero.
The romans were even more immoral and bloodthirsty.
They and the persians have been fighting pointless wars for centuries.
Innocent people suffered the most because of it.
So yes Khalid (May God be pleased with him) and all the other Muslims of that time were indeed real life heroes much to the dismay of you and the likes of you.
Regarding Umar RA relieving Khalid from his command, It wasn't due to any animosity it was actually due to the fact that Khalid was winning so many battles at so many fronts in such a short time that the general populace started Attributing victories towards Khalid himself rather than Allah. Fearing that such high reverence of Khalid might lead to some sort of apostasy he immediately relieved him of Command. All though in his later years Umar RA would severely regret the decision citing that had Khalid Remained commander he may have conquered the entirety of Europe and Asia on his own.
Not sure about the 'later regret part' as it was because of his decision that he could fight in battle of Yarmouk leading it to the unexpected victory
@Michael Donato i think Umar RA made a wise decision, because Khalid Ibn Al Waleed was conquering lands faster than the Caliph could keep track of + as @hadi mentioned, his name was revered more than God, for whom he was fighting. It was not out of the fear of him making a separate name for himself that Umar RA gave the decision but the consideration of how his heroics could create space for people to idolise him. Any wise muslim ruler will take this into consideration.
Plus, it was because of this decision that he was able to defeat the Byzantines in Syria
In Islam there is no what if , when it comes to the past , everything happened accordingly as part of Qadr of Allah.
Ikeyse what Allah pre decreed is accepted umar ra is wide and made his decision best on what would please Allah
@@shuaybmuhammad1037 Let my life be sacrificed for Hazrat Umar ra but he did not make a right decision that time Coz after the death of Saifullah he regretted his decision.Sahabas are not infallible they made mistakes and the best part is they accept it without any hesitation.
Hazrat Umar's reign saw Islams rise but the conquests were relatively slower cz he interfered too much in the army's welfare.
He sitting in Medina used to give instructions to the commanders like who will be in charge of the left or right flank, where would the army rest when to send reinforcement. Obviously there was no whatsp that time so it took months conveying a single message and this slowed the conquests.
I swear if it weren’t for this channel I’d be ignorant about much of the history of the Middle East and Asia, thank you for your hard work my friend 🙏
@@Scotty-P reading is not interesting for some
It's questionable for me, Why did the Arab Nations call 'Khalid bin Waleed' a "Hero"?
'Khalid ibn Walid' was from the 'Bani Makhzum' tribe of the 'Quraysh' tribe (Of the 29 battles of the Prophet Muhammad, 12 was against the Quraysh tribe. The Quraysh tribe was one of the Arab tribes of Hejaz.) His father, 'Walid ibn Mughira', was one of The most stubborn enemies of Islam. 'Khalid ibn Walid' was one of the 'Quraysh' allies who had the "position of the Dome," meaning the arsenal and ammunition, as well as the position of head of the 'Quraysh' army. He was one of the commanders of the polytheists (pagan) in the battle of 'Uhud' Against Islam and one of the causes of the defeat of the Islamic army in that battle. He took part in all the pagan wars "against" the 'Prophet Muhammad', After (bayʻat ar-riḍwān), they united.
In the case of the Massacre and looting 'Malik bin Noireh' Arab tribe, After Massacre 'Khalid' killed 'Malik ibn Nuwayrah' while he was (an Arab and Muslim) then raped his wife that night, and put Malik's head in a pot of food and cooked it! had also committed adultery. also, the Massacres and looting Muslims of the 'Jazima' Arab tribes (The way it was fought was also cowardly, This is another story).
in the battle of 'Ullais', 'Khalid Ibn Walid' said if they could defeat the "Sassanid" army in the battle of 'Ullais' (the Ullais region in the al-Badiyah area near the Euphrates River, 633 AD in Iraq), "I paint the river red with their blood" and because the 'Sasanian' Army was defeated( Coup in the Sasanian capital, This is another story); By order of 'Khalid', the people of the city (They were of Arab descent), all of them (Anyone who could not escape the city, children, women, old men) taken captive, By order Khalid They beheaded them And their blood was shed in the river.
'al-Mughira ibn Shu'ba' says" There were mills along the river, by order 'Khalid' They made flour with bloody water for three days and prepared food for the army of 18,000 or more. The dead in 'Ellis' was forty or seventy thousand people.
'Khalid bin Waleed' committed war crimes. he is the butcher of a lot of Arab people (Muslims and non-Muslims). According to Shari'a Law, They should have executed 'Khalid bin Walid'. For political reasons 'Prophet Muhammad' covered 'Khalid' sins And crimes because he needed his services. Actually 'Prophet Muhammad' was a partner in the sins of 'Khalid ibn Walid'.
for example, 'Amr' (second caliph), strongly objected to him, called him an enemy of God, and swore that he would kill 'Khalid'. (throwing stones at his head until he died). But since 'Abu Bakr' (first caliph) desperately needed Khalid's powerful army to advance his rule, he defended him and did not impose any punishment on him.
.
In fact, 'Khalid bin Waleed' was a criminal Mercenary in the service of Islam so that Islam could grow and spread with the help of his sword. With this description, 'Khalid bin Waleed' cannot be called a "Hero".
If you look in history books, you will see many such acts. Some audiences criticize what I have mentioned above and deny it, Some people also said that Khalid bin Waleed became a Muslim and all his sins were forgiven by God. I must say that we are not talking about supernatural matters, for this reason, I mention to reference:
I have translated the source address into Arabic to make your work easier, Please check again, And please read history without religious prejudice:
.Reference:
(History of Ya'qubi, vol. 2, pp. 110 and Al-Ghadir, vol. 7, pp. 158-166; Complete, vol. 2, p. 137; Tabari, vol. 2, p. 503; Beginning and end, vol. 6, p. 322-279)
(Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari; Volume 4)
(Ten thousand-year histories of Iran; Volume 2)
(Tabari volumes 3 and 4;)
(The Book of the Prophet's Wars; Muhammad ibn Amr Al-Waqidi; Volumes 1, 2 and 3;)
(The book of the character of the Messenger of God; Ibn Hisham Volume 2.)
.
اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 5 صفحة : 160
اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الطبري تاريخ الرسل والملوك وصله تاريخ الطبري ، مؤلف : الطبري، ابن جرير المجلد : 3 صفحة : 67
اسم الكتاب : القرآن شعراء/سوره26، آیه216
اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 5 صفحة : 160
اسم الكتاب : السيرة النبوية - ط مكتبة محمد علي صبيح وأولاده ، مؤلف : ابن هشام الحميري المجلد : 4 صفحة : 883
اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 8 صفحة : 74
اسم الكتاب : صحيح البخاري ، مؤلف : البخاري المجلد : 9 صفحة : 73
اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الطبري تاريخ الرسل والملوك وصله تاريخ الطبري ، مؤلف : الطبري، ابن جرير المجلد : 3 صفحة : 280
اسم الكتاب : الاغانی ، مؤلف : ابو الفرج الإصفهاني المجلد : 15 صفحة : 203
اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الإسلام - ت بشار ، مؤلف : الذهبي، شمس الدين المجلد: 2 صفحة : 24
اسم الكتاب : المختصر في اخبار البشر ، مؤلف : أبو الفداء المجلد : 1 صفحة : 158
اسم الكتاب : وفيات الأعيان ، مؤلف : ابن خلكان المجلد : 6 صفحة : 14
اسم الكتاب : مراه الجنان وعبره اليقظان ، مؤلف : اليافعي المجلد : 2 صفحة : 90
اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الإسلام - ت بشار ، مؤلف : الذهبي، شمس الدين المجلد : 2 صفحة : 24
اسم الكتاب : كنز العمال ، مؤلف : المتقي الهندي المجلد : 5 صفحة : 619
اسم الكتاب : جامع الأحاديث ، مؤلف : السيوطي، جلال الدين المجلد : 24 صفحة : 433
اسم الكتاب : المختصر في اخبار البشر ، مؤلف : أبو الفداء المجلد : 1 صفحة : 158
اسم الكتاب : وفيات الأعيان ، مؤلف : ابن خلكان المجلد : 6 صفحة : 15
اسم الكتاب : تاريخ الإسلام - ت بشار ، مؤلف : الذهبي، شمس الدين المجلد : 2 صفحة : 24
اسم الكتاب : الکامل فی التاریخ ، مؤلف : ابناثیر عزالدین ابوالحسن علی بن محمد جزری شیبانی المجلد: 2 صفحة : 217
اسم الكتاب : نهایة الارب فی فنون الادب ، مؤلف : النویری المجلد: 19، صفحة : 52
@@samiedi4134 copy paste, I have answered you. Don't spam.
@@samiedi4134 spam ea bro
@@samiedi4134 stop spam
Arab general : The enemy outweighs us 3 -1 ! what shall we do!??
Khaled: Send a cavalry behind them to make sure that the enemy cant flee
Stolen comment lol
Brilliant comment. I laughed so much
That comment was mine! =D
@@mzmi1422 talk about yourself, we like it.
@@mzmi1422
we like nationalism
Correction at 8:45
Yemen entered Islam willingly at the life of the prophet, the entire Hamadan tribe entered Islam in one day which made the prophet knell to God with gratitude.
Yemen wasn’t “easy prey”, this implies it raised the sword against Islam while it accepted it without force.
الحقيقة ان كتاب التاريخ مابعد الخلافة الراشدة حاولوا بكل الطرق الاستنقاص من اليمن في كل فرصة يجدونها مثلاََ حين يذكر القادة العظام من الصحابة والذين ينتسبون لمضر او نزار وا غيرها من القبائل العدنانية تجدهك يكتبون كل الامجاد التي تبدوا في مخليتهم لكن حين يأتي الدور على القادة العظام من العرب اليمانية لا يذكرون الا مروراََ كأنهم مضطرون لذكرهم قادة من امثال ذو الكلاع الحميري والعلاء الحضرمي َعمرو بن معد يكرب وغيرهم يذكرون على استحياء وهذا ماتعمدت فعله كل المصادر خاصة في عهد الامويين واوئل العهد العباسي.
The Battle of Yarmouk is simply a masterpiece of tactical genius...
And siege of Emisa was brilliant.
@@laitilulu 30k islamic soldiers vs 2 lakh byzetiye roman allied forces
@@laitilulu he means millions in Urdu. Even I a Muslim don't believe it. If the Roman number was more than the Muslims its 2 to 1 maximum and some of Muslim sources dont exaggerate while others make it a sci-fi novel 😂
@@laitilulu Bring your sources then, or stfu!!
@@laitilulu so what sources are valid? from people who never saw or heard about the event? in your standard even roman history and Macedonian history would be under same skepticism as their events were documented by roman and macedonian historians respictevely.
So, in your standards, history of humanity is not reliable.
Abu Bakr: "Conquer just Leva-"
Rashidun generals: *"INSTRUCTION UNCLEAR! CONQUER HALF OF BYZANTINE EMPIRE!"*
@Ammar Hanafi What? he conquered so many lands
no proof abu bakr even existed .
@Saquib Khan NO i DON'T BELIEVE THINGS WITHOUT PROOF.....YOUR DUMB...GO READ ABOUT SOLOMON'S FLYING CARPET IN YOUR QURAN , OR MAYBE TALKING COWS....HEY i'M BEING NICE AND NOT MENTIONING THE SICK STUFF
MUHAMMAD WAS NOT A REAL MAN .
@Saquib Khan Well, but Umar did conquer intensively.
@@RexoryByzaboo he conquered when it's needed
Never learned any of this history in school. Learned about European history, etc, but didn't realize how interesting early Muslim history was. Great video! 👍
Germany '' you can't win a war when you fight on two fronts "
Rashidun caliphate " hold my beer ,,, sorry i mean my water !!!
hold my zam-zam
@GustavusAdolphus1
This is the army of Rashidun Caliphate if u know what means that, they are Muslims they dont drink alcohol.
@@tamazghaunion9158
Thats irrelevant, thier past is not related to the topic and the event. They become Muslims already and look at your comment: u said Rashidun Caliphate you are talking about islamic period not pagans.
@GustavusAdolphus1 romans and sassanids had nothing left except larger army than the muslim. and a bunch of elephant
Let's just appreciate the praise made in Tamazghas comment. His intention was only to show how badass they were in achieving those wins, beer was just modern slang reference, which he even clarified by turning it into water :)
Everyone: Damn this quarantine, hardly have anything to watch anymore.
K&G: I got you bro.
We have a population of some 350 million people, they claim that one million people have been confirmed as having Corona virus, that's one out of every 350. Your chances of getting hit by lightning is one in 300. Are people wearing hardhats with lighting rods on them to protect themselves from lighting? It's a farce. But because of it, people are paying $600.00 for freezers that wouldn't have sold for $100.00 three months ago. The last one we sold had 200 hits on the advertising in Facebook within 3 hours of posting it, they came from up to 150 miles away for the one freezer we advertised because all the stores sold all they had weeks ago and are saying they won't be able to get any more until August. Of course if they didn't cram their freezers with so much food they block off the circulation of air that causes freezers to fail, they wouldn't need to look for another one. People are crazy. I'm curious to know what it is this is diverting attention from. A .005% chance of getting flu isn't something I'm going to worry about. Don't worry, it's not going to last much longer.
@@dancingwiththedarkness3352 Things must be great in Trumpland.
@@dancingwiththedarkness3352 You are right bro.
But to answer your question of what it is diverting our attention from, most likely the enormous troop placement that is occuring atm near the Lithuanian, Polish and Ukranian borders. 'Defender 2020' is a farce. More than 1k tanks, and a huge ammount of humvee's, AA-mounts, Troop Transports, Logistical Trucks, over 100k soldiers and a Fleet in the Baltic Sea, is NOT neccesary for a 'Military excercise'. Largest troop displacement of the US to Europe in over 25 years.. Even in this moment dozens of trains & planes are arriving by the day in those areas carrying even more military equipment.
But ofc Russia is going to be made the agressor by the Media in the not too distant future. Not saying Russia is a Saint, but this kind of Military Troop Displacement, the russians havent seen since Operation Barbossa by the Germans.
And as far as Corona goes, it is a Virus, it is deadly, but the panic we be doing is totally excagerated. We be putting on Masks and maintaining Social Distance like its an airbourne virus, which it is not. If it were we'd have 100's of millions of infected, and millions dead.
@@admiralsquatbar127 you would think so, all the retail stores sold out their freezers two weeks ago, they still let people put orders in, knowing they wouldn't get them until July. We checked again Monday, they won't let you preorder them and won't get any more until August, those factory's have been shut down and have to fill the back orders first, whenever they decide they can go back to work. We have to get used ones whenever we can find them. Of course they are aware of the law of supply and demand. They know theres no supply and have been demanding 5 times what we used to get them for. Then being used, they've been selling ones that can't be fixed with the good ones. The only way to make sure their good is plug them in and run them for 24 hours. Between the cost of buying them and the junk ones we had to pay $400.00 each for that can't be fixed, so far we are making about $25.00 on each one sold. The only reason we bother is people who are going to lose over a thousand dollars of food unless they can get another freezer fast enough. Another week and we won't have any refrigerators either. We constantly check on the stores, but there are people who need one, but seeing the price think we're ripping people off, then they go all over town finding out they can't get one anywhere. They run back to get ours, but they usually are paid for and hauled off within a hour after we open. They're freaking out because they're losing all that food and all we can tell them is if we find more, we'll call them, but they if they don't get there quickly enough, someone will buy it. It's artificial shortages created for something that apparently doesn't exist. It's going to get a lot worse, theres no lawnmowers, other appliances and basically everything summer related that hadn't been shipped to the stores before they shut everything down. That stock we had is almost gone and it isn't even when we normally start selling these things. The stores are saying they won't have any of that until August as well. I've seen a few freezers advertised for $1,500.00 for something 10 years old. When we run out, people will have no choice but to pay their prices, buying from them you buy as is no matter how much you pay. The freezer might not even be capable of working at all. Like we are, anyone buying from them is stuck with it. Private sales from people's homes have no legal protections at all, and without plugging them in for 24 hours theres no way to know if they are good until then. Greedy people are taking advantage of it. We do what we can for our customers, as a reward, they believe we're ripping them off, $25.00 isn't worth the time and trouble, but it's one less that they can sell for 3 times what we do. These people will drag them out of alleys and sell them as good. To be good in business, it seems to be more profitable when you have no morals at all. I just sit and watch the madness, yes it's fear and loathing in the land of Trump. Actually I'm beginning to suspect this is them buying the next election, they're tossing money around like it's nothing. But enjoy your vacation, it's going to get interesting!
@@laylobinson5839 In the seventies the government became very insistent on everyone getting vaccinated for swine flu, suspiciously insistent. We were vaccinated at factories by the military. They went to schools to vaccinate the children. Personally, I believe it was for something in the germ warfare line. Whatever it was, I haven't had any flu lasting more than ten hours starting about a year after getting that vaccination. Maybe they have something up their sleeve they figure everyone has forgotten about.
Man this guy is an absolute monster, hearing about him the first time just feels like It's movie plot but it's real, reality is stranger than fiction.
Khalid ibn walid wasn't a monster, id say he was more of a smart warrior
It's really unlikely that you understand invasions in that era, but you can't compare it to your "idealist" world.
Indeed he was sword of Allah ♥
Khalid was relieved of his commanding post because the people used to praise him for his constant victories, and Umar the caliph at the time had to remind the people that victory only came from God.
I have read the Muslim Version of all these events and now a neutral version also shows that the Khalid bin Waleed was best General in Muslim history, specially his tactics to cross Syrian desert was a bold move.
If Umer didn’t withdraw him from commanding army he might get all of Anatolia in his life.
Yes, khalid aim was Constantinople,,,but Umer made the decision to ban him from any other battle after invading syria.....the reason is khalid was killing most the soldiers of his enemy .....Umer thought that they should be given the chance to convert to islam or pay the tax before they get killed even in the battlefield
The reason Umar ban Khalid was that the Muslims sarted believing that Khalid was invisible and only through him victory must come. Even Umar said that I ban him to remind the Muslims that neither Khalid nor anyone else holds victory. Its Islam that brings victor nobody else.
KAD132 That was not the reason. The Caliph Umar r.a. felt that Muslims had started to see Sayyiduna Khalid r.a. as something of a divine sort due to his brilliance in war, so he wanted to remind the Muslims that victory was ONLY and ONLY through God.
@@quilliamattari2772 - I will forever have difficulty accepting how anyone can see fit to take the command away from a blameless hero after Allah's final Prophet had put him in that position.
@@KAD132 - Khalid was right ! If a soldier opposes you , then he dies. His women and children will have the chance to convert or pay the tax if they choose.
27:22
Sassanid Commander: Where's the Cavalry? I thought they had Cavalry?
Khalid-Ibn-Al-Walid: Right behind you
*insert TF2 fanfare*
and winged hussars arrive :D
Winged hussars in 683
Buttsecks
Khalid: _"No more sister-fucking for you,Persian!"_
@@tasinal-hassan8268 lol
People of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh will love this if it is translated into urdu language...
Bangladeshi and Urdu?
Sassanids," We have elephants."
Arabs- "Ever heard of ghost camels?"
lol
Its really funny those battles, Sassanids couldn't understand or swallow the surprise and the shock! Few arabs from desert slashing them very fast
HAHAHAHA
having large army and elephant persian nationalist say they weak by war thats why arab defeat them
@Truls Andersen the arabs of the battle of qadyssiah dressed the cammel to look scary,so the elephants of the persians will be afraid of it
It's actually kinda scary how good Khalid ibn waleed and his army was.
Reports from the soldiers in his army say "There were no two fridays between which we had not won a battle or conqured an area" , his tactic, Fast moving cavalry or what we would call Lightning war
Bruh ur squad is more scary
@@enesdolangez8389
He is not even real.
Its a miracle of God. Shows the truth of Islam. They were an army who are certain of two things. Martyrdom or victory.
@@laminsillah5999 Truth brother
imagine a new religion emerge and within 25 years of its emergence ...it smashed the 2 superpowers of that time in the same time.....
2 week powers that been exhausted of hundred of years between each other
"We are a people who were ennobled by Islam, so if we seek nobility through something else, God will debase us."
- Umar ibn al-Khattāb RA
@Raizen Cruer Bro!! how tf is that an excuse? the Arabs were a divided Bedouin nomads up until that point they didn't have hundreds of years of battle experience like the Romans or the Persians
They won because they were united in their love to Allah and his messengers
@@dannysa6126 2 weak powers who were still many times wealthier, stronger and experienced than the newly formed Rashidun Caliphate. They were able to assemble gigantic armies which completely outnumbered the Muslim armies. And in the end, they both got smashed.
The greatest military commander known to mankind.. Khalid Bin Walid.
God gives victory
@محمد العنزي اجل من افضل منه؟
@محمد العنزي the best ever, none come close to him.
@محمد العنزي يا متخلف في قائد عسكري في العالم خاض 100 معركه وبجيش صغير وهزم اعظم امبراطويتين في ذالك الوقت في وقت قصير
خالد ابن الوليد رضي الله عنه اعظم قائد عرفه التاريخ منذ بدايه البشريه
indeed imagine this was khalid bin walid and how imam mahdi will be
It’s mind boggling that the most underrated fewer people fought the two superpowers and the Arab rebellious at the same time and won! Even the alliance of the Sassanid and the Romans couldn’t stop them. I am also amazed by the courageous women that stoned their men to return and fight back while they were in a clear disadvantage. It’s nothing less than a miracle!
MUHAMMED (صلى الله عليه وسلم/Salutations and Blessings be upon him), was truly the last prophet and final messenger; He was called the Ameen (trustworthy), and was neither a soothsayer,nor a poet, nor a magician,and nor a madman (ASTAGHFIRULLAH) !
Even what you stated is understated , as those early Arabs Muslims were fighting with much inferior war armors ; They had three things in their favors : 1: faith (Eman) in ALLAH (SWT/ سبحانه وتعالى ) , 2: Being the best fighters of that Era ,3: Their swift mobility
This is because Allah was protecting them
@@chiefrabbi6735 why did Allah abondon Muslims today?
@@TheBarser they must be doing something wrong
@@TheBarser
God is always with us and has never left us, for He has mercy on us, consoles me, gives me of His great bounty and covers me with His mercy. Who are you on the day you speak of God?
It's remarkable how successful these Arabs were in their crazy fast conquest.
@@muslimabdullah6157 the world would be better off if your prophet had never lived.
@@Nutellafuerst why does the so-called Islamic state kill Muslims than any other people that may because the USA said they created them so you're ignorant slave of the west
2 Words: Arabian horse.
@Sam McIntyre
Hey Sam
Slam Allah A'alik
First forgive me if my English is bad
Hope you read my words with an open heart
I hope from a pure heart guiadnce to me and you and to all mankind.
I call you to follow the path of Prophets and their message in beliving in "our true one God".
I call you to believe in
God who created Adam, Noah, Abraham, Israel, Moses, Jesus and Muhammad (peace be upon them).
All these Prophets in all time from Adam to Jesus and ending to muhammed (peace be upon them) their message was "God Lord is One" his majsty name is "Allah" in Arabic or "Elohim" in Hebrew or "God" in English with G capital
And Islam is the Arabic word of beliving in this God and follow the path of all these Prophets, The really true God who created the heavens and earth, who created live and death, God who created all creation.
I call you my friend to believe in this God, I call you to answer the the Prophets and follow their path in beliving in One True God and this is simply what Islam means.
i call you to belive in this fact which is never change starting from Adam the father of mankind and ending with Muhammed the last and final messenger of all mankind.
And stop saying that Jesus (peace be upon him) is god !!
Jesus (peace be upon him) is just a Prophet and he is simbly an example for Prophets who went before him.
Slam :)
Jarlaxle Daerthe god gave you, me and everyone else a choice. If you choose to close your mind and follow the path of disbelief and sins then it’s your fault. God is not cruel or evil no more than a teacher who gives a student who didn’t pass an exam an F, it is the result of your work. and who told you that 99% of humanity is going to hell?
Reguardless of your personal beliefs it was a impressive rise of power and deserves respect
🟨🟨Jesus lived in the region called today Middle east,that's why you should check what historical sources in this region are saying,history is about sources not "theories",Jesus was the Messiah simply a man,a reformer of faith.The majority of people under Romans and then later Byzintines in Syria,Iraq,Egypt,North Africa,part of central Asia and even Goths in Eastern Europe and Spain, and Germanic nations believed in Jesus simply as a prophet of God but Romans and Byzintines under the fast spread of the movement founded by Jesus tried to save the ideology of the impire which is paganism by integrating the new faith into their ideology and this is how "christianity was born" and they forced it on people around the ancient World with persecution,burning religious books and hisorical sources ,all what happened from the 1st century AD till modern era has been about this struggle,nations in what's now called Muslim World and in Spain for some period of time accepted Islam since it's close to their faith and Islam gave them religious freedom and these nations fought with Muslims and this why Islam spread so fast in few years , European nations stood against the Church in Rome and Constantinople but with time the Church was able to spread their political ideology,this period was called the "Darks ages" and it's the Church which made it dark ,later the European renaissace was just an other phase of this struggle.
Europeans today have no idea of their true history simply because the "Church" wiped it out .
Haters will always hate bro
@@mateopribyl9218are you comparing nazis to muslims?
Okay, it would be the case if you disregard all the false conversions etc
Envoy: Cesar, good news, bad news.
Roman commander : start with the good news?!
Envoy : Our army outweighs the Muslims 4 to 1
Commander : and the bad news?!
Envoy : Khalid Ibn Elwalid.
There was no battle that the Roman's outnumbered them 4 to 1 not even rome could muster a 4 to 1 advantage ever
@@Lp-army1 Muslims love to exaggerate
@@muhammadeisa1459 No worry man our sources is more reliable than others, and you will agree if you study and understand "mustalah alhadits". If not, yo will only become an ignorant fool.
The Sassanids really enjoyed dying in duels.
Haha yeah thats nice one
Lonnell Westbrooks if you believe arab accounts. Statistically its hard to believe that all duels were won by the arabs knowing that persians were better equiped and experienced wariors.
Even if you admit that arabs were more determined due to the false belief that one can go to paradise in the battlefield after committing crimes in the name of religion, it is hard to believe that all duels ended in victory for the arabs.
Indeed iranians were great warriors. You can look at how iranians perform now a days in wrestling or martial arts to have an idea.
@@raminnawab4530 lol ya keep crying
@@raminnawab4530 bro just let it go. If they were great warriors they wouldn't have lost their entire empire to the arab armies, especially being better equipped and experienced, as you said
Liverpool Ynwa well, they had conquered half of the known world for centuries and even up to few years before the arab attack, that is why i say they were great warriors with experience.
My point is that the history is written by victors and they tend to exaggerate their own merits ans put down the enemy as worthless.
They need to release a game called
AGE OF EMPIRES: KHALID EDITION
🤣
davidl0917 genghis khan doenst hold the title of “only undefeated general in history”
Rezaul karim khan Oni people say genghis khan was undefeated but he lost a war against his brother so yes, Khalid (Ra) is the only general in recorded history to have died undefeated in battle.
Rezaul karim khan Oni okay I checked it out and you’re right. The others seem to have succeeded in quelling local uprisings and a small amount of battles without defeat. Khalid was, the undefeated conqueror.
You mean Khalid Total War?
Protect this channel at all cost, it's amazing UA-cam hasn't yet found a reason to sensor your work.
Nobody ;Romans and Persians fights for 600 years
Rashidun Caliphate: comes and end their game of rivaly in couple of years.
Nothing like a kill steal...
@Suspicious Ned Flanders
Yeah, by a toddler who can't even walk properly!
Because the caliphate was newly born.
@Suspicious Ned Flanders The persians and romans BOTH had an advantage in
1. Numbers
2. Military Experience
3. Wealth
4. Military Equipment
5. Logistics
6. Training
7. Fighting on their own land
Zoroscums suffer from an inferiority complex. That's why they think anything post-Islamic Persia has achieved was because of their ethnicity. What a bunch of diaspora leftovers.
@@ME911119 Well, it's probably not as advantageous as you think. I doubt the level of training and military experience was actually that different. Both Empires were large enough to have to fight different enemy in different fronts while having internal strives at the same time. It is very likely that the training and experience of the troop Roman and Sassanian sent simply could not match the quality of Arabic tribal worriers until the battles in 636. On the top of it, Arabic leadership were simply more talented and daring than Roman and Sassanian.
Lot's of Dua for Khalid Bin Walid.
Ameen ya rab
May Allah be pleased with him.
Ameen
@@youtubeowl9544 Ameen
Ameen
For the guys wandering why there is too much ibn?
Ibn in Arabic means son
Ibn sina = son of sena
@Rick K basically
@Rick K yea exactly
@Rick K How about Sony Erickson, who's son is who here...
Halid bin Velid name is Halid, velid is his fathers name it like surname
@Rick K its like not that . there is a full name version that you can search on internet and find but for example avicennas short name was abu ali ibn sina which means abu ali son of sina
Arabian Hejazi knight Khalid Ibn Al Walid: The sword of God.
Hejaz History is amazing. The land of Abraham and his first son Ishmael "peace be upon them".
Khaleed Ibnu Waleed best general ever, 100 of wars, never defeated
@@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 napoleon and alexander come close also this indian dude whos name i forgot i think it was chandragupta or something like that he was a beast too
He was defeated in the Battle of Mutah and that's his only defeat. However he was able to conduct a successfull retreat
@@geediosman6415 I would put Chandragupta somewhere between 20th and 30th rank of best generals. I say that as an Indian who studied Indian History.
Arab Soldier: Lightly armored and agile.
Special Ability: +15% attack in desert terrain.
EW 6,but for the ottomans>>
Don't forget the +100% morale bonus when fighting infidels
Mahmoud Okasha fuck the otmans
@@kaptenlemper nailed it
Shudhesh Velusamy I’m a gamer that real funny😂 Arab soldier
+15% attack when in desert
+15%speed when you ride a camel
-80% Hp in cold places :(
100% Persistence and determination when your General call Khalid
A game should be made:
Khalid ibn Walid: suffering from success
Duude :DDD
The pyrrhic war is a better example of suffering from success
by far an amazing amazing AMAZING video, as a professor of medieval warfare, this is something people should cherish, I'm going to buy Merch and hand it to my best students because this channel has helped so many of my students enjoy history and look forward to the lessons! Thank you Kings and Generals
Thank you, good sir!
@@s.ii.5829 how?
@@s.ii.5829 only haters say that because this is true
the truth hurts my brother
@@s.ii.5829 this is what you think i won't argue with you because that is useless
you will not believe if i gave 100 evidence because you are mind washed
When Khalid goes into a dark room, he doesn’t turn on the light, he scares away the darkness
😂😂
Was khalid bin waleed a rapist ????
@@vicsing8333 ???
@@vicsing8333 nah,but your father is...
And your mom's the victim 🤣
And You're the unwanted child🤣
True love = the love of God!
*God himself went to the cross for you out of love for you as a human being*
Philippians 2:5-8
trust me, when you scroll down on the comment section is all about "Khalid bin Waleed"
what a great general and choosed to finally join the Muslims after several encounters fighting against the Muslims, i beleive there must something positively interesting about islam which left that brave heart (Khalid bin Waleed) surrendering...
read sirah then if u want to know
"Khaleed Al Waleed"
100% Win Rate
LMAOOOOO
Khaleed bin alwaleed*
@@ramzytv8561 LOL LMAO TOO
This man died on his bed, and he was so sad that he didn't die by an arrow or a sword.
Ayhem Shaban
He died standing*
Yarmouk Battle had me on the edge of my seat! Amaaaazing content here. Didn't know about Khalid.
Battle of yarmouk was surely one the most important battles in history because it decided the fate of the region
Battle of yarmouk byzantine empire gatthered all theirs armies approx 250k soldeirs while arab army was only 30k .(allah gives victory to whom he wanted to)
Khalid Ibn Walid is a well known general in islamic history. he was known as the Sword of Allah. although, there were warriors amongst him that did not participate in those battles such as the 4 caliphs. those 4 caliphs, specially Abu Bakr and Omar R.A. fought Khalid in battle (he was not a muslim at that time and the prophet was alive) and he was defeated but not killed. Omar Ibn Afan being the strongest warrior at that time. being a testament in the video, Omar is Indeed feared in his time.
@@diasiqasse6532 muslim army*
@@diasiqasse6532 wow dude chill, there wasnt a 250k army, for like, ever, until the napoleonic wars, the roman army in yarmouk was more like 70k. Winning such a force is still an awesome feat of khalid as he was outnumbered 2 to 1 but just get your facts straight
"The enemy army suffered total defeat, while Khalid only lost a few thousand men"
Lmao yeah I heard that line many times especially where he lost a few hundred.
"only lost a few thousand men"
How is that even possible?! The duels at the start certainly don't help, but seriously, that level of incompetence is hard to fathom.
@@soleimanghaznavi2599 its the truth and its describe by christains
@@e7venjedi study Islam and you will know.
I really like the accurate naming of African polities here! Meroe, Makurua, Blyemmes, and Aksum. I know this may seem like a trivial detail to many, but thanks :)
@monhbold naiman
Askum is ethiopia
@@darklight8338, Aksum kingdom was Eritrean and tgray, not modern Ethiopian
Aksum was dope
Aksum one of the greatest kingdoms in African history
Regarding the Battle of the Chains, you comment that it was unlikely that the Persian soldiers chained themselves together as the Muslim historians claim. Yet, for the final battle of this episode you state without comment that the Persian Immortals chained themselves together.
Noticed the same thing.
exactly
This was just pure science fiction the 10.000 Immortal Infantry was an Achamenid thing only. The sassanids had immortals but it was a cavalry regiment it was basically the elite of the savaran cavalry.
Was about to write the same comment, he also makes all Muslim or Arab sources seems like untrustworthy while Muslims had something that no other nation had till now and makes their claims the most reliable and trustworthy, it's Hadith sciences and important part of it is (علم الجرح والتعديل) Al Jarh Wa at-Ta'dil and the following copied text will give you a brief about it
Ajarhu Wa Ata'deel ( الجرح و التعديل ) is a science of the sciences of Hadith, dealing with identifying the narrators whether they are reliable or not. Ajarh/الجرح is finding a deficiency whether it is in his righteousness (عدالته) or in his accurateness (ضبطه), or in both. Of the deficiency is in his righteousness then the Hadith would fall under Mawdu' (موضوع) and Matrook (متروك). If the deficiency is in his accurateness, then the Hadith will fall under Da'eef, Munkar, Mttarab (مضطرب), Mushaf, Maqloob, and Mudraj (المدرج).
Atta'deel, is describing the narrator in His righteousness and accurateness with what is required for accepting his narration. The acceptance of the narration would fall under, Hadith Mutawatir, Saheeh, Hasan, and their types.
It's purpose is to keep Islam safe. Ajarh Wa Atta'deel is Fardh Kifayah, which means it is required only on some not all, Fardh Ayn means it is required on all Muslim.
I found it weird too
Fun fact about Battle of Yarmouk:
The reason Khaled sent his cavalry units to block the path of escape on the final day of the battle is that he received reports from his scouts that a sandstorm is heading north from the dessert. Khaled knew arab bedouins being familiar with navigation through sandstorms would give them a decisive advantage against the Romans which outnumbered them 5 to 1. His strategy was to remain on the defensive until the sandstorm arrived.
He knew the Romans could not handle the sandstorm because the wind was blowing in the direction of their faces while it would be to the backs of the Arabs.
Once the sandstorm arrived, the Romans were blinded and panicked, and the Arabs went on a killing spree. The Romans that tried to escape through the bridge were met by the cavalry unit that sent them to their maker.
This phenomenon happened also in many others battles ,specially in the Qadasiyya battle,which favored the outnumbered Muslims forces immensely, as it started in the third day ,when QaQa Ben Ameur with 700 troops went undetected through the enemies forces ,in order to kill Rostan and his entourage; The killing of Rostan precipitated the loss of morale in the ranks of the Persians Sassanids Zoroastrians forces!
@@sidibouchrit Qaqa bin amr ra did the same manouver in battle of nehavand
@@MohsinRaza-uq2ow , JZK for the info. ! I wish I have time to catch on all the intricacies of all the battles,that the early Muslims engaged in ! The SAHABAS (RA رضي الله عنهم ) were developed and trained , and taught discipline and myriads strategies by the last prophet and final messenger(Salutations and Blessings be upon him/صلى الله عليه وسلم ) !
@@sidibouchrit Appreciated
everyone can do that
Wow Khalid seems like a great warrior one of the greatest I’m curious because I don’t know much about Muslim history but is there any other great generals, kings warriors, throughout Muslim history just as great or even greater? I would like to learn about these figures I find the historic aspects of the religion very interesting
Nah there aren't any greater commander than Khalid ibn Walid ra. But yeah Ali ibn Abi Talib ra was a better warrior and he also was a great commander.
Salah al deen (saladin)
Alp Arslan
Mehmet II (the conqueror)
Bayezid ( thunder bolt)
Suleyman the magnificent
Tarik Ibn zeyad
Musa Ibn nusair
Al walid ibn abd Al malik
Muhammad Ibn Al Qasim al thaqafy
Oqba ibn nafea
Amr ibn al a’as
Abo Obayda ibn al jarah
Saad ibn aby waqas
Al Qa’qa’ ibn amr
Youssof ibn tashfeen
Abdulrahman I (al dakhil)
Abdulrahman II ( al awsat)
Abdulrahman III ( al nassir)
Al hagib ibn aby A’amer ( al mazur)
Berke khan
Harun al Rashid
Noor el deen mahmoud (zengi/zenki)
Baybars
Qutuz
Osman ertugrul
Murad II
Malik shah
Mahmoud ghazni
Babur
Aurngzeb alamgir
Shah jahan
Jalal el din akbar
Mansa musa
Abdulhamid II
..
..
and more
They put the world's two major super powers on their knees on a diet consisting of dates and water
And they started out with crude awful quality weaponry. 😂 Despite neglecting and rejecting all muslim sources no one can refute that Khalid ibn al Walid was the absolute badass, perhaps the only man who rivalled the Great Genghis Khan in terms of military genius.
@@daniyalqureshi2690 do not compare that mushrik with our Sahaba brother
@@Ashish447 As a fellow Muslim, I feel it is my duty to tell you that he is comparing them in military skill which they both had. Stop being offended by something so small
@@bilalwaheed1125 alright. I'm not offended though
@@bilalwaheed1125 uP
Kings & Generals I just want to thank you so much for the good work that you do in making these video's they are top-notch - I really appreciate this one it helps answer so many questions.
Khalid bin Walid was the definition of a War machine, he even spoke about his love of being on the battlefield, though I can say much of his bravery came through his faith. In Islam, dying through combat for the sake of the faith is by far one of the most honourable and awarded ways to die.
intense following in faith and ideology can often carry a battle, same way imperial japanese believed in glorious death in battle which made them fight even without proper supply lines or tactics
Yeh for sure he was the first terrorist in history in the literal sense of the word
However he didn't die in battle despite having war scars all over his body, the more you read about him the more you can appreciate what an amazing general he was.
I'm a Christian and I must say I'm Really impressed by Khalid's fighting skills and genius ✝️❤☪️
Respect
Who would you say is the best Christian general?
@kolp898 Oh no we don't.
@@il967 Patton
@kolp898 there is no one true god. Not one in your text at least…
Khalid to yahan in Yarmouk :
-You will face men who love death as much as you love life!!!
Favorite Line
While Khalid lost just few hundred troops.
there was a Korean admiral who sank the whole Japanese fleet and did not lose a man, until the last the last battle when he was killed. Khalid reminds me of him.
@@rembrandtshadows well, thats bc he invented a new type of boat
1:10:36
"Heracleus married his granddaughter..."
Me: "wait WHAT!?"
"...to the young Sassanid Shah"
Me: "Oh thank God!"
😂😂😂😂
Well he married his niece Martina which was highly unpopular and regarded AS incentious. Some patriach even wanted to undue it.
@@danraf1562 I love how no matter what culture; 90% of the time when a ruler goes "ayyy divine marriage y'all" people start immediately grumbling 😁 seems we humans arent all that bad
For one second, I thought it was Alabama Empire 👀
yeah, english is weird
Rostam: "I have an army of elephants"
Saad: "We have camels"
Actually they where more of horse nomads, camels were used in long distance travel through the sahara mostly by merchants. Horses are used in battle and arabs at that time had a deep connection with horses.
@@altumurnemtzra2026 I think he's talking about the time when a general of Saad dressed up a bunch of camels to scare off the Persian elephants during the battle of Al Qadissiya. The video mentions it in the last battle.
@@Aa-dc2xu Ohh, I didn't know that happened.
😂
@@gerardb5220 At least at that time Muslim historians feared from Creator so they wrote the history books as it is was