Nice video! I am really enjoying sensitive FT in square. I also love the fast program, full square tones. It’s just a matter of getting used to the new language. I have to keep reminding myself this is not the deus. I trust the notching much more with this instrument. I won’t hesitate to discriminate or create a notch from 0 to 58 or so, I have found a lot of cool stuff with those settings in locations that I had previously combed over with the Deus. During this learning process I also scrutinize tones a little closer as I really don’t look at the screen. I am less willing to call something iron just because I hear an iron tone in the mix. It could Very well be a mixture of metals close together, so I dig. I’m enjoying its capabilities! Thanks for the good hunt!
@@searchingshropshire very true, when I’m working on the forest, desert or fields, I am at -6.4 always. If I get into a park or an area that is crazy with trash, I may compromise with higher discrimination or notch so I can get in and out of that area efficiently, at least while I’m getting used to these tones. Be safe!
@@glaflamme instead of notching or discing things out use the full tones to cherry pick why you dig. That way the detector stays at full power. It takes time to master but it’s worth it.
Yes, but i think the Tones are more scratchy and not as smooth and clean at a positive signal as with the D1. All in all, i like the HOT in D1 more... 17:48 A good example on your video. The sound from the 68 signal is not clean, if i have the same signal on my D1 i would say there is iron wth it. A clear non ferrrous signal would generate a clear fulltones sound!
Nice video! I am really enjoying sensitive FT in square. I also love the fast program, full square tones. It’s just a matter of getting used to the new language. I have to keep reminding myself this is not the deus. I trust the notching much more with this instrument. I won’t hesitate to discriminate or create a notch from 0 to 58 or so, I have found a lot of cool stuff with those settings in locations that I had previously combed over with the Deus. During this learning process I also scrutinize tones a little closer as I really don’t look at the screen. I am less willing to call something iron just because I hear an iron tone in the mix. It could Very well be a mixture of metals close together, so I dig. I’m enjoying its capabilities! Thanks for the good hunt!
I like the square tones. Notch 58 is very high especially in the U.K.
all the best.
@@searchingshropshire very true, when I’m working on the forest, desert or fields, I am at -6.4 always.
If I get into a park or an area that is crazy with trash, I may compromise with higher discrimination or notch so I can get in and out of that area efficiently, at least while I’m getting used to these tones. Be safe!
@@glaflamme instead of notching or discing things out use the full tones to cherry pick why you dig. That way the detector stays at full power. It takes time to master but it’s worth it.
I had so many hammered coins between 40-60.
Same here.
I find the Deus ll on Sensi FT is sharper and louder
That’s the FMF mate. Also it’s like the Hotter program I made for the Deus.
Yes, but i think the Tones are more scratchy and not as smooth and clean at a positive signal as with the D1. All in all, i like the HOT in D1 more...
17:48 A good example on your video. The sound from the 68 signal is not clean, if i have the same signal on my D1 i would say there is iron wth it. A clear non ferrrous signal would generate a clear fulltones sound!
@@searchingshropshire Which software version you running?
Try the fast program. Way better
@@goldmanjace In what way do you say fast is better than SENSI FT??
Horrible on overlapping your sweeps
Cheers for comment. It was just a show that the Deus II has a program similar to Hot.