Linux Fanboy Reviews macOS: Feels OLD.
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 чер 2024
- Try OnlyOffice, the best open source office suite for Linux: www.onlyoffice.com/desktop.aspx
Grad a brand new laptop or desktop running Linux out of the box: www.tuxedocomputers.com/
👏 SUPPORT THE CHANNEL:
Get access to an exclusive weekly podcast, vote on the next topics I cover, and get your name in the credits:
UA-cam: / @thelinuxexp
Patreon: / thelinuxexperiment
Or, you can donate whatever you want: paypal.me/thelinuxexp?locale....
🏆 FOLLOW ME ELSEWHERE:
Linux news in UA-cam Shorts format: / @linuxshorts5136
Join us on our Discord server: / discord
Twitter : / thelinuxexp
Mastodon: mastodon.social/web/@thelinuxEXP
Pixelfed: pixelfed.social/TLENick
My Gaming on Linux Channel: / @thelinuxgamingexperim...
📷 GEAR I USE:
Sony Alpha A6600 Mirrorless Camera: amzn.to/30zKyn7
Sigma 56mm Fixed Prime Lens: amzn.to/3aRvK5l
Logitech MX Master 3 Mouse: amzn.to/3BVI0Od
Bluetooth Space Grey Mac Keyboard: amzn.to/3jcJETZ
Logitech Brio 4K Webcam: amzn.to/3jgeTh9
LG Curved Ultrawide Monitor: amzn.to/3pcTVDH
Logitech White Speakers: amzn.to/3n6wSb0
Xbox Controller: amzn.to/3BWmIA3
Amazon Links are affiliate codes and generate small commissions to support the channel
00:00 Intro
00:38 Sponsor: OnlyOffice, the awesome open source Office Suite for Linux
01:32 What I used to test MacOS
02:11 MacOS Desktop Features: it holds up
06:52 Window Management: it's bad
10:58 App Management: it's good, if it's in the Store
15:31 Good or Bad?
18:28 Sponsor: Get a laptop or desktop with Linux preinstalled from Tuxedo
19:38 Support the channel
You get a top bar and a bottom dock, a layout that's now really common, and easily replicated on any Linux desktop. Mac OS goes for the global menu, which I like.
The dock itself just hosts open application, and open windows for apps that aren't in the dock, plus it has the trashcan, recent applications, and a few nice features.
It also has one very annoying limitation: you can't minimize an app by clicking on its icon, which is very, very frustrating.
The desktop holds icons, by default, only your disk drives, but you can store anything you want there, with a nice feature: the ability to automatically stack files by file type.
In terms of options and look and feel, you find a light or dark mode, with an auto switch depending on the time of day, and accent colors.
Finally, to run applications, you either launch them from the dock, or you have a full screen app grid with search, that works pretty much like the GNOME app grid.
You get the excellent Spotlight, which lets you search for virtually anything;: files, apps, settings, webpages, you name it.
Window management on mac is a nightmare. You get the close button, the maximize button, and the minimize button.
The close button doesn't close the app, it closes the window.
If you minimize the the app's icon, and you have multiple windows minimized, clicking on the app's icon will only bring back the last window you minimized. Subsequent clicks don't do anything.
Then there's the maximize button, which doesn't only maximize, but takes the window full screen. If you press the ALT key and then click on the green button, then your window will not maximize, or go full screen, it will just expand to fit as much of the content as it can.
Then there's the tiling. You can't just drag a window to an edge of the screen to tile it. You have to long press the green button to access a small submenu that lets you pick an edge to tile the window.
Now there's a good part, still, the Multitasking view, called Mission control. You can access it with an icon on the dock, a hot corner, or a keyboard shortcut.
Again, good idea, mediocre implementation. the GNOME activities view beats that without breaking a sweat.
On to application updates and installing them. Here, your default option is the mac app store. It's a beautiful face on a not so well stocked app selection.
We could learn a thing or two about how they present apps. They have editorial content presenting stuff users might need, by type of activity, they present the most used and downloaded apps first, something we still don't do.
If you can't find what you're loking for on the Store, then you can still resort to the "hunt online for a downloadable app" solution.
What you get in the process is a DMG file, which is a disk image. TO install your app, you have to open the DMG file, and then drag the application to your Applications folder. Sounds simple on paper, and most DMG files have some kind of visual explanation to let users know they need to drag the app into the folder.
The issue here, is that I've met a number of people who never understood that. They open the app from the DMG image. - Наука та технологія
Try OnlyOffice, the best open source office suite for Linux: www.onlyoffice.com/desktop.aspx
100% sure you are paid to say that
@@kenos8216 he did say he was sponsored soo.. ?
@@kenos8216 No shit Sherlock.
@@kenos8216 that's how sponsorships work🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯
@@kenos8216 Ummmm, duh!! Did you not see the sponsor spot in the video? Anyway, who cares?
I wouldn't say "even Windows" does window management better than macOS. Windows actually does window management pretty well. It's one of its strong points.
Yeah in windows 11 it's pretty good
It *was* good with the classic taskbar. Ever since they did the taskbar grouping thing (and therefore hiding text) and added preview-pop-ups (that you can only disable via registry hack), the workflow greatly suffered for me.
I will never understand why Microsoft (and a lot of the Windows userbase) think its better, if the huge 27" screen only uses a few icons on your left side of the taskbar, while all sub-windows get grouped behind the icon. You have to either use Alt-Tab or do this awkwad thing of moving your cursor to the program icon, wait for this window preview, *then* you can only start looking for the sub-window until you find it. This may not sound like a lot of used time, but oh boy, it adds up soooo much if you use Windows for a while.
Classic Taskbar on the other hand: You look down, read the title of the window you want, you move your cursor down to the very wide button and click it. No waiting, no hidden text, no unwanted mousehover pop-ups. Personally i dont even need to actually read, since the taskbar is always visible the Windows and their text lines are printed into my consciousness, so i can switch to the window i want almost "blind" on classic taskbar. No other desktop design philosophy could ever reach this simple, quick and reliable windows management for me.
This is also one reasons why i really dislike Windows 11 (despite many other reasons).
It's in the name.
@@TheLinuxEXP Windows Vista was ahead of its time.
I had a q6600 and George 8800gt so it worked faster and better than XP.
After having the search and the window snapping I hated using XP machines.
@@LegioXXI Are you talking about only Win11? Because even in Win10 you can ungroup icons in the system settings.
What was even more glaring to me was this Ne.nd.rthal acting like you can't put the taskbar on any edge of the screen. Maybe that changed in Windows 11, but most people are still using 10 or earlier.
I love this. It's like a glimpse into a parallel universe where Linux is the predominant Desktop OS. :D
I'd like to move there!
This is basically how being inside the linux community feels like
In this universe Linux Desktops are only for elites.
I kind of like it.
Haven't you considered that you are on the wrong side? Because the predominant Desktop OS is Windows, not MacOS... and still, I can tell you Linux is better
what in earth are you talking about, dont you know the year of the linux desktop was 20 years and its been nothing but market dominance since
Mac apps are actually not single files, they are directories with a special extension (.app) and internal structure, which is shown by the OS as just the icon of the app. It's actually quite nice to be able install/remove apps just by copying/deleting files. It's a paradigm users already understand. But ... a few apps also require a custom installer, and then you get the typical Windows experience, in which you also need a custom uninstaller to remove it. This confuses many Mac users, because they are not very used to it and struggle to remove these apps.
I can understand the confusion when you can't apt-get remove. If you are coming from linux and prefer to do things in a needlessly complex way, install brew and then you can brew install and uninstall to your hearts content. Us Mac users will continue to install apps by dragging them to the applications folder, and uninstalling by dragging to the trash.
@@LunaticEdit jeez, why so hostile?
@@arbi9506 I wasn't aware my comment was hostile? I used linux for 8 years so I got a chuckle about macOS feeling old. Last year I tried to find a linux distro that works with 1 1080p and 1 4k monitor and literally failed to do so - always had issues, either outright, or dragging between monitors. Themes are inconsistent across apps due to some being GTK, some being Qt, etc. Don't get me started on Pulse VS ALSA VS Proton audio. The reason I switched off of linux is because at this point I need my computer for doing work, not to tinker with.
@@R0MUl0 I think XCode is absolute garbage, so no arguments there. To be fair, I consider visual studio on windows to be a slow piece of garbage as well. I use either vim, or jetbrains IDEs -- on both windows at work and mac at home -- have you checked out AppCode? I've had my M1 air since release and I've had absolutely no crashes whatsoever. It's been rock solid and I use it day in and out 7 days a week. I can't really speak for x86 as all of the apps I use have been ported to arm64 at this point. I know everyone has their own experiences -- but the last 3 or so attempts at using a linux desktop has ended in frustration and at this point I don't want to touch it unless it's in a kubernetes cluster or vsphere.
@@LunaticEdit dragging them to the "Trash" doesn't always "Fully" uninstall the program or Apps either.
Yes, window management has been a pain on macOS for a long time and has only gotten marginally better over the years. One small correction though: you don't need to exit Mission Control to move a window from an inactive Desktop to another. You can use a three-finger swipe left or right, or use a keyboard shortcut (by default Control + Left/Right Arrow) to switch Desktops without leaving Mission Control.
It /does/ depend how you work. The only window management that I wish I could do on macOS that I can’t is a keyboard shortcut for “move to next monitor”. However, I agree that fullscreen is almost always useless, and maximize is what I want. But Mission Control means that I don’t need to do things like tiling.
@@natbarmore I disagree on that one. Maximize's role is to give as much space to a window as possible which is effectively what Full Screen does. Additionally, it moves the full screen window to its own desktop which is a better behaviour since, as a window is maximised, I don't want or need other windows in the way. If I'm working with a full screen window (say VSCode, Modelsim, Overleaf or what have you), any other window appearing should go to a separate desktop.
Doing so is even better when tiling. macOS' practice of treating a pair of tiled windows as a single full screen entity is also great.
As for the criticism of not being able to tile with only a single window open, I'm not sure I understand it. In what world would you want to have only a single window tiled?
Personally, I believe that replicating macOS' full screen behaviour would be a good idea for any DE out there while taking inspiration of both it and Windows' behaviour for tiling would be a good idea.
Meh, I’m alright installing other tools for window management. While on Linux, I stick to FOSS, everyone on Mac understands that some slightly more elegant solutions essentially “nickel&dime” you. Sure if you come from Linux you expect to be able to install a window manager for free, but on Mac you’ll probably pay $2 or $3
@@barbietripping There are free and open source window managers on mac, Rectangle is a popular one.
Imo, three-fingers swipe with Apple’s touchpad to switch desktops is one of the most ‘addictive’ feature of MacOS
Another gripe I have is how they seem obsessed to hide anything that is considered as "advanced" - even for simply access to "Save as" when saving something, you need a specific shortcut. And the finder which hides the actual filesystem folder hierarchy, more "special shortcuts" for simple things like deleting a file, etc. Manipulating large numbers of files is a serious PITA in general.
And windows 11 took the same route and everyone hates it for that. 😪
@@romulino yep, it is like dumbing down ppl
Win10 was my last Windows and now I'm on Garuda Linux and never looked back :D
I am fine with some stuff being simple by default, as long as I can customise it so that what I need is quick to access. Macos takes this too far. I get annoyed with nautilus using ctrl+l to edit the file path, but not showing it is stupid
@@romulino Windows 11 you just click the path bar lol it default highlights it so you can copy it lol
@I DUBZH Zorin is nice :D
I think many ppl will leave Microsoft, expecially since Valve is "steaming" up Linux (pun intented xD)
Some of this is painful to watch as a macos user :D
But yeah, window management is much better on Windows and Linux. To be effective you have to learn the keyboard shortcuts and gestures.
"Just use gestures" is the deal breaker for me. I hate gestures with a passion. Though I also dearly miss trackpoints so maybe my take isn't very popular.
@@matthewriley5819 For me its quite opposite. The Apple Trackpad and its gestures were the main selling point of macOS for me. Without it, i would not use it. It just feels so liberating being able to bring up window overviews, to go a site back in the browser etc, without having to waste time shoving the curser to some buttons all the time.
Especially with a large monitor its a great difference. On Windows the wasted microseconds of curser-shoving add up so much if you really spend a lot of time on your computer. I even get pain in my hand after a while, because i move the mouse so often every time when im not on macOS (and therefore also not using a trackpad).
I guess its all preference at the end.
But i can agree on one thing: Gestures being *mandatory* in order to probably manage your windows on macOS is a huge flaw.
Most of this video is cringe.
@@dragonballjiujitsu Cringe how? Your comment implies that you have some useful feedback, but instead you provide no useful feedback at all.
@@terraltheible How about scrolling through the comments and you will find a massive amount of info I've typed.
Alright so a few notes that I'll sprinkle as I watch the video (as an avid macOS user that prefers it over Windows and all flavors of Linux- I've tried pretty much them all)
2:38 The best part about this "global OS menu" is that it's really easy to script and search. Just clicking on "Help" gives you a search bar that lets you search the menus a la Microsoft office. You can also easily script these to automate tasks for apps that have zero scripting functionality with AppleScript.
3:14 This is just one of the pitfalls of Apple's multi-instance ideology. Until OS X came up with this concept it wasn't common to have multiple documents for one app open. They designed the dock around the idea that an application can host multiple windows but the window isn't the app, so closing the window wouldn't close the app. They offer a "kind of" solution in that you can click Hide to hide all windows of the app, however. You could really go either way, and Apple chose the way more consistent with OS principles. Completely valid criticism though.
5:33 Honestly, I prefer this sometimes. Sure, it's fun to customize the crap out of your desktop but sometimes it's really nice where you can go to your coworkers computer and not have to figure out how their desktop environment works. We used to have themes but those went away in favor of the consistency (that app devs love too). I work in a development company and I had to do a presentation on my coworkers computer, which had a tiling window manager that I didn't know how to use. You can imagine how that went.
5:53 Most macOS users use Spotlight to open apps since it's much faster than finding your app's icon, but I presume an application-specific menu would be useful to those who want it.
6:40 Honestly my favorite part of Spotlight is the built-in calculator and the ability to run commands. Super handy.
6:58 Completely agree. For pretty much all Mac power users one of the first things we install is a window tiler. Apple tried to fix this but their implementation is terrible and they deserve all criticism for it.
7:58 It used to actually be a maximize button in OS X Lion, where the full screen button was on the right side. They merged them in Yosemite and now the shortcut for maximize is to double click the top bar, which is definitely easier but is less intuitive.
8:21 This really depends on the app. Maximize events are handled by the developer, so a maximize in Adobe software maximizes the whole screen while Safari only fits the content, something I assume is to aid responsive design (?) not really sure.
10:58 I honestly can't think of a single macOS user that actually thinks the App Store is the intended way to install Mac apps. It's an absolute joke, to the point where most of Apple's official apps have versions that you can just download instead of using the App Store.
11:10 There are a variety of reasons between the sandboxing of apps, invasive update policies, app store guidelines so strict that most open source apps could only have about 75% of their functionality, but perhaps the biggest reason is the fee to get into the App Store. It's $99 a year, which compared to the alternative (downloading a .dmg) is an unnecessary cost that makes updating and releasing harder.
12:46 The only time I've experienced this was with an old version of iPhoto, and that's it. Most Mac apps retain compatibility between versions, the only time this wasn't true was when they dropped support for 32bit apps with Catalina.
13:43 You didn't criticize this but I feel like some people might be helped by this explanation, it's a DMG file since macOS app files are technically just folders that house the resources and the binaries. That's why you can't just download a ".app" file. Some apps use .zip but DMG is still the common practice.
14:10 Even in this case, 90% of apps I've encountered will have a little popup offering to move themselves to the applications folder or outright not running at all until done so. DMG isn't an official app distribution format, it's just a disk image format and that's why it doesn't have it's own "application install" methods. It's literally just a folder and it's up to the developer to tell the user.
15:06 There's a little-known workaround for this, right clicking and clicking "open" will let you avoid going into System Preferences.
Honestly, this video does highlight the main problem with macOS. Apple makes it "intuitive" but the way they do that is by sweeping most desktop management features under the rug. All of the intuitiveness is lost once you try to do power user things and most of it is kind of a "if you know you know" thing. I find Snazzy Lab's Mac Tips series really helpful and I wish Apple would be more obvious with what seems like pretty expected features.
I ain't reading allat
Yep. It’s cooler to hate on other platforms than bother to understand them. Good on you, bro!
These days, you really have to use a trackpad to take full advantage of all the window management stuff. When you are in mission control, you can also use the three-finger swipe to move between desktops, which imo makes it easy to move windows around between them. I also don't understand why they don't enable App Exposé by default. If you set it to three-finger swipe down, it will show all windows from the current app, including those that are minimized. I would say in general, the most deficient aspect of Mac OS is the Finder. It's missing many things that should have been added in the past 20 years, and it's buggy enough that you can never really trust it if you are trying to do anything with a large number of files.
Anyway, I'm glad Linux exists for you and Mac OS exists for me, because we each seem to like and prefer the conventions of each. Not everything has to be the same because people have different preferences.
+1 this.
I like using macOS and Linux for different purposes. macOS is my main Desktop OS, while Linux is the working horse. Every time i need a pragmatic solution for anything, every time i need an efficient OS without a lot of resource waste, i will pick up a Linux distro that fits those requirements. Would never use Windows or macOS for example on a Raspberry Pi (instead of RetroPi), even if it was possible. Same goes for Admin systems. Linux may has the smallest desktop market share, but on every other usercase, Linux is king.
You don't have to stick to only one operating system for *everything*. Its perfectly viable to combine different systems for different purposes.
Wouldn't know what a trackpad is to be honest. I mostly use a desktop nowadays, and even before when I regularly used a laptop I almost always connected a mouse to it. I'm also a windows guy so I'm a mouse guy. My current mouse is a MMO mouse and has 12 keys on the side that are mapped to various shortcuts. We windows guys like our mice and macros. We don't like having to use the keyboard that much unless we type, and we don't like trackpads because the accuracy and speed of a mouse is lightyears ahead.
I don't even know half the shortcuts mapped to my mouse. I just know what the macro does and have totally forgotten what keys I actually need to press on the keyboard to achieve it lmao.
And also btw I'm a Linux guy now. Windows 11 made me switch last year. But prior to Linux I had been using Windows since I was a kid. I've gotten fairly advanced with Linux, way more than I ever was with windows to be honest. Due to being an advanced user in general though, in less than a year I've managed to become way more advanced than the general Linux user that's been using it for many years. I know where everything is located, I can code my own stuff. The only parts of Linux I haven't messed with yet are kernel type stuff. And honestly I don't even want / need to. It was never my intention really to become this knowledgeable. It only happened because I made multiple messes initially and had to fix them (I'm an extremely arrogant person who will do things his way despite of consequences and risks - which should answer your question as to how I got there). I just want to use my computer to get stuff done and for entertainment.
ENT2 On Desktop Macs, many people use the Apple Trackpad instead of a mouse. Trackpads on Windows do not work as well and I don’t think anyone uses them on Windows desktop machines.
You can actually double-click on a blank spot on the top of the window, the one the traffic lights are in, to maximize. You can also set it to minimize (but that is just straight up annoying). I really don't like the behavior of the green traffic light as well, but at least maximizing works.
yeah it works which is nice but isn't apple the company that's praised to be intuitive to non techy users?
Sometimes it maximizes, and sometimes it goes in whatever which way it wants because MacOS thinks it's already maximized.
GNOME works the same way, and it doesn't even have maximize buttons.
@@a544jh Not really : GNOME, like any other OS basically, would maximize the window if you double-click it. macOS would not maximize it, but sometimes maximize, sometimes expand...
@@kevinv2507 another thing is that you can drag the window to the top panel to maximise it, and you can drag from the top panel down unmaximise it
for windows management I use Rectangle, the window interface in Mac OS is really outdated... with rectangle I even have keyboard shortcut that makes the desktop a joy. I found more easy to organize the windows in Mac OS nine than modern Mac OS
I swear by Rectangle, IMHO a solution superior to any mouse or touchpad-based one: I have all sides and corners of the screen mapped to the numeric keypad, including moving between multiple monitors.
As I will have to migrate to Windows as my daily driver later this year (I'm an Apple user since the Apple IIe!), I'm circling the idea of reproducing its functionality with AutoHotKey.
Yeah like installing extensions on gnome to make it actually functional. Honestly god awful design. I would choose Win 7 or KDE over any other mac os like garbage
@@escifi I've never used Windows 11, but Windows 10 allows you to open apps (and the associated windows) with Super (Windows) + [0-9] if they're pinned to the taskbar.
Windows 7 is better than any UI Apple has ever made, and I've been using Macs since the early 1990s. I haven't owned one since 1998, but I've used them too much. They are, IMO, the worst big company around: terribly anti-consumer and anti-repair.
I see quite a few people here who use Rectangle, which raises the question: why are you okay with having to use third-party tools to get basic UI functionality?
@@theglowcloud2215 The same reason they use Apple: they don't know any better. 95% of them could do the exact same tasks with a Chromebook. 80% of them could chuck their Macs and just use their phones to do their daily computer tasks.
But who could live without their dock icons shaking and jumping around when a notification is waiting?
Overall, I prefer macOS since I'm most familiar with it, but I feel like macOS excludes mouse users so much and its one of my biggest complaints I have about macOS. The fact that I have to install an app to disable mouse acceleration is just stupid.
And yes, you can double click on the empty part of window to maximize it but in my experience, there's like 50/50 chance of actually working and that really frustrates me every single time.
Also I really miss cover flow on finder.
Considering macOS was one of the first operating systems to fully adopt the mouse, it seems strange that now macOS is probably one of the least intuitive operating systems to use with a mouse. Using macOS with a keyboard with tools like Spotlight or Alfred (Spotlight on steroids) then I find myself being really productive. Windows is kind of catching up with Windows 11 and PowerToys on Windows 10, but still not the same.
This will sound weird, but... I personally don't like monochrome tray icons. color helps me a lot at finding the application icon I'm looking for. When they're monochrome they sort of blend together to me and it takes me more time to find stuff.
Indeed! Doesn't sound weird at all!
I will never understand why people want so much conformity in their small tray icons. All that does is to make it harder to find the actual icon you want to click on. It's form over function, and that's bad when you're regularly interacting with it. Colours, which don't even need to be bright, make is so, so much quicker and less painful to distinguish between icons.
Yeah on Plasma I've had my tray icons go monochrome white after changing to some certain icon themes and it always makes it such a pain to find what I want in there.
Same.
Was Mac since the late 1980's and still have an original MacIntosh! However, once Apple started leaving my expensive MacBook pro behind, I discovered Linux and Fedora just blows Mac OS away! Your video just confirmed that this was the best move I ever made!... Thanks!
Let's be honest, the absolute only thing Mac and Windows have over Linux is a few apps, or better hardware acceleration in some app. These are all third party and a have nothing to do with the OS. If we're talking about the base OS though, current Fedora for instance shreds Windows and Mac combined in every aspect, except maybe power management with laptops (I've only heard rumors - I don't use a laptop)
Totally agree. My experience to a T. I love the Arch distros especially. I love the whole Linux community and the innovation I find in the Linux family is innovation with purpose, and not disjointed is disconnected from the whole user experience.
@@ent2220 actually battery life is double on fedora 34 and 36 when compared to windows (Asus zenbook ux461 with i5 8250u).
The computer fan is off, performance is smooth constant 60fps and it is ice cold.
@@ent2220 Third-party support is still huge. Nintendo has had issues with not having enough third-party support and they got crushed in a few generations. IDK how well GNU/Linux would be doing without Steam. I imagine a ton more people would at least be dual-booting because Wine is far from perfect.
A Chromebook could shred a Mac just based on how they're typically used.
@@ent2220 And the power management and other such things are because of lacking proper drivers from the manufacturers. So, yeah, Mac and Windows have that on Linux: better drivers and several apps/games that are well tailored for their specific OS. In the general sense, Linux is much better. And the Linux shortcomings seem to get smaller and smaller as people start to embrace it and manufacturers see that there's a market forming for them there.
The conclusion is kind of amazing, as free and open source stuff often can be a mess when it comes to looks and ui, and apple has the reputation of being amazing in those regards. Super cool to see linux actually being superior user experience, and I have to agree; I've had to use a MacBook and an iMac in the last couple weeks and and to my huge surprise as someone who hasn't used them much, especially when it comes to managing windows it's a very frustrating os to use. Linux and open source stuff in general has come a long long way!
Linux UI is not superior. It's just Linux fan boys and their channel crying about it for attention. I'm sure many people would choose Mac OS for its looks.
@@ArunG273 I'm not here to cry or bash one os or the other, just pointing out that in my own experience linux ui is less frustrating to use than mac os. I'm pretty new to both linux and mac os and used window for my whole life just to make that clear.
@@ArunG273 The basic desktop environments of Linux are fine. Especially the recent Gnome 42 has really made Ubuntu 22.04 a very user friendly, smooth and fast OS. The UI of the OS really isn't the issue. It's the significant holes in workflows that people expect to be able to do. This is things like missing applications, but also the "ecosystem" features that many in Apple land find hard to give up.
If you've ever tried to game on a Mac, you'll run into the exact same frustration that other people run into when trying to use professional software on Linux. Some stuff straight up doesn't work, for other stuff you need to mess with the terminal to get things to run properly, and if things run it's slow as hell and crashes often.
I'm not saying Linux doesn't have UI issues that it needs to fix. But so do Mac OS and Windows. They all have the basics nailed down, and people just want to get to the application or website they care about. That just needs to work. That's where people encounter problems.
@@ArunG273 An aesthetically pleasing UI isn't necessarily also one that's nice to use. What are looks going to do if one can hardly grab and use the UI they get? Take Windows 8 for instance. It looked nice but users couldn't stand having to use it. What we see at 09:10 looks pretty similar to how Metro apps snapped on the left and right, it's probably that Microsoft did a lower quality copy of what MacOS did, which fared much worse than the MacOS design. Also the assisted window snapping where you drag your traditional window and it snaps to the left/right which MacOS lacks has become one of the basic features people expect nowadays. Mac's snapping and maximizing behave in unexpected and limiting ways without offering a more sane alternative option, which doesn't seem to help with Mac's case for superiority. Who knows? Maybe Mac is more like those tiling WMs that not everyone can live with.
@@ArunG273 Looks aren't everything. I'd rather stick with my two-tone dwm than use freaking OS X's DE. That thing is an absolute joke when it comes to window management. I feel like I'm getting carpal tunnel syndrome just hearing him talking about dragging windows all over the place.
I really recommend using Rectangle for the window manager, MacOS has awful tiling supposedly because Microsoft patented the whole "drag to tile" thing.
Is that really the reason? Then how come many paid apps bring this functionality to MacOS, and GNOME has it by default?
@@Sancredo sounds like bs, a UI is a mode of operation and therefore not covered by patent law.
Same way as saying Microsoft patented sign language
try mosaic, it's the only viable(and in my opinion better) option to people missing fancy zone. every expensive tho
@@Sancredo yeah. I assume that's because Rectangle is open source and Microsoft gave up on suing Foss projects some years ago. Most other projects by the maintainer are commercial, but he probably doesn't want to risk being sued by Ms.
When I owned a MacBook a few years back, I always got the feeling Apple didn't want me to be productive. However, I erroneously assumed that by now they would have fixed those issues, but your video pretty much made it clear that they haven't.
Oh Apple do want you to be productive. It's only that they want you to be productive in their own very specific and lots of times ass backwards way.
One example, MacOS seems to work better if instead of managing windows you manage workspaces or virtual desktops, swiping to change desktop, using everything maximised etc etc. Which is dumb, but 'works'
@@prgnify because of that alone I would never buy an Apple product myself. I'm forced to use it for work and use my 32 inch 4K monitor and have enough space to do all the work on it, but window management is ass. I rather curse the company everyday than they force me in to their way.
One positive - after work I use my Linux with Gnome and appreciate all the freedom I have. :)
@@LordAlacorn they are supporting native linux on their ARM mac, check it out (btw this is not from an apple fanboy, I rarely use their products)
@@prgnify Couldn't have said it better. When I tried apple products while I was still using windows, I quickly came to the conclusion that they were made for noobs. Sure they make some stuff really easy, but there is a glass ceiling, and to break it, you need to exert a lot of effort. And that was from a Windows perspective. It would be even worse from Linux one.
@@prgnify Everything maximized isn't dumb. It's just poorly implemented on Mac OS X. Switching full windows (monocle mode) on dwm is as easy as pressing Mod + J or Mod + K.
OS X wastes too much memory making everything pretty and adding useles animations so switching between apps feels very sluggish.
Apple has a mandatory 3 week review for apps in the app store, and hence most third party developers distribute apps using disk images and not through the app store. Also, I agree on the default window manager too. That is why I install Rectangle which is a better window manager. And to install apps, I install homebrew, which is a command line package manager.
yeah, in this day and age, given the state of desktop Linux, my jaw drops to see how much cobbling has to be done to turn a MacOS computer into a day-to-day, useable, livable experience
@@TheSulross cobbling is the principle of Linux, isn’t it ? Since you have to make it the way you like anyway.
@@shiroishii7312 Depends on the distro. If you want a solid normie build, there are plenty of distros like Linux Mint and Zorin OS that have the common stuff baked in, like competent window management, an office suite, media player, etc. Most of the cobbling is optional.
Having to install a new program because the shipped DE is that terrible is just plain hilarious considering how boring and homogeneous Mac OS X is. And using Homebrew on Mac OS just defeats the purpose of using a Mac.
Re: OP:
1. Apple takes a massive cut of sold apps in the App Store.
2. Nazi-esque enforcement of keeping apps in the IOS/Mac OS X theme so everything can look boring and the same.
3. Apple treats their devices they've sold as still belonging to Apple. They will deny any app that might allow the user to do anything that Apple doesn't want them to do. They can brick it if they think you've been naughty repairing your own home button. We're talking about a company that sends copyright threats and cease-and-desist letters to people posting repair manuals for Apple hardware.
Using the Apple App Store is like using a food delivery app: the only people coming out ahead are the middlemen.
@@shiroishii7312 yeah, that's pretty much true. but it's become a bit less so in some areas than used to be the case. However, even with the recent Ubuntu 22.04 release, which has gotten mostly favorable reviews, there are still a couple of things that require cobbling:
1) Ubuntu refuses to support flatpak out of the box and stubornly clings to their Snaps, so it's necessary to install a package to enable using flatpak apps
2) I actually still use icons on the desktop and it's necessary to install a Gnome extension in order to get decent config UI to manage that, and it's also necessary to install a browser extension in order to be able to download and install Gnome extensions (which is just beyond weird, but there you go - the bizarre landscape of the Linux world)
99 percent of devs use the App Store because an App Store app can also be installed on iPhones and iPads. Id know since I'm a cs student
I honestly didn't expect it to be so bad. Also now I finally understand why every mac user I see use apps as a small square in the middle of the screen instead of just maximazing it.
I have a mac for work and I don't use the green maximize button but for some windows I drag the corners out to make them take up the whole screen. It's a bit silly not having a button to just do that.
@@quickdudley pro tip, double tap the top bar of the window, it stretches the window to fill the screen without entering full screen mode
It's all the more annoying when they share their screen. Especially the terminal.
@@msrsooraj the terminal is actually one of the ones I deliberately don't have full-screen. My terminal windows are all either 80 or 161 columns wide. (161 so that in vim I can have two buffers open side by side 80 columns each and one column of the separator character)
@@tefkah That just seems "logical" and I didn't realize this was an issue on Mac. That being said, I've never used a Mac or iPhone. I do own a 2018 iPad pro and I'd be a liar if I said it wasn't a great device. Maybe I should look into maximizing it's potential and seeing if installing a nix distro would be easily achieved
Great review my friend and I too shall have to do my own macOS review since switching to Linux review soon. As a long-time Mac user, over 20 years, and recent full-time convert to Linux, you were both fair and balanced. The most surprising thing I have found after 20 years of macOS is how little I miss it. Yes, I am a power user, and yes, I am a geek, but nevertheless, I am proof that you can leave the macOS for Linux. My computing life just feels better holistically from a mental and emotional perspective. Accordingly, at this stage in life it's just a matter of preference and I am glad that I finally made the switch to Linux. To be completely fair and transparent, I too still own a MacBook Pro from 2014 and plan to buy a new one soon to keep up with the macOS for my own blogging and UA-cam videos. And I have a Windows 11 partition on my laptop, and I like Windows 11, as well as Windows 10. However, Linux is and has been my daily driver since November 2020, and I am convinced that you appreciate one platform without bad talking others.
Again, great job and God bless,
Pro tip: brew calls itself the missing package manager for macOS. It works like pacman and is also available on Linux!
And as a macOS user I can relate to your points. It's crazy that Apple rather features and relies on 3rd party tools for eg. window management instead of putting it into macOS itself.
In the other hand I really like Rectangle for window management. With these tools it's a bit of a Linux feeling in terms of customization, some can even mimic i3 behavior!
honestly, after installing rectangle and brew, if you squint hard enough, it looks like linux.
But, it's not out-of-the-box, and that on 2022 is really dumb from Apple
11:27 Apple doesn't allow free software to be in their store. They don't like GPL license
Damn
homebrew
Wow lmao
@@TheLinuxEXP To be fair, it's more of that the App Store *is not compatible* with GPL license. Specifically, apps downloaded from the App Store has DRM built-in, which is against GPL's "no imposing restriction of any kind are allowed". Apple wouldn't necessarily ban you from distributing GPL-licensed apps to the App Store, but the owner of the original code may complain due to license infringement.
@@SenaStuff Yup, this. There was a lot of drama in the iOS scene for a while about working with GPLed code too. A bunch of free apps that were repackaged GPL software got taken down because the original devs requested the source code, which the repackagers couldn't do because all of the Apple APIs were NDAed. etc etc. Honestly... it's why all of my code is just MIT licensed. I don't care for the GPL or die fervor.
There are 2 apps that completely smoothen macos experience. Rectangle for window management (for God's sake don't buy Magnet - it's worse and costs money) and Homebrew for package management. With them installed macos is the best system I've ever used (it's like linux but with apps)
loved rectangle, it's my fav tool
once I get homebrew I don't miss linux at all. I get it Docker is still better on linux but it's not like I can't use docker on mac lol.
The moment you need 3rd party to fix what 1st party couldn't it's just bad.
To enhance it is something completely different.
This goes for an OS, games, programs and everything else. Augmenting the already existing UX is good. Repairing (especially Apple environment) is just sad
@@Appoxo In General macos offers much more than other systems so I don't mind repairing two drawbacks with third party apps
yabai is a pretty great window manager too
The last proper Apple computer I had was an iMac G3, years later I decided to try and daily drive a hackintosh, everything worked fine, but even then I felt that OS X was stuck in place, especially when it came to the window management.
It's impressive to see that Apple are still as stubborn as ever about the UI and the only way to be productive is to constantly use shortcuts.
They don't want to risk alienating or confusing their customers. Windows 8 was an unfortunate leap in UI design that left people hating it despite it being just a tiny bit ahead of its time.
@@encycl07pedia- if windows 8 was "ahead of its time" I don't like where ui design is going
@@dylon4906 The UI elements like settings being in a pull-out/pull-down shade, floating volume popup, notifications in app icons/tiles are present in mobile OSes like Android and IOS, granted both of those came out before Win8. It was touch-centric, but most PCs were still not using touchscreens and tablets, IIRC, hadn't really taken off as much by 2012.
Win8 was a marked break from the previous Windows UI. People hate change, especially forced change. Windows 8 wasn't as bad as people think. It definitely wasn't the best Windows release ever, but it didn't deserve all the hate it got, at least not much more than Windows 10.
@@encycl07pedia- i realize in tech, you can't be too fast, you can't be too slow. actually, i think that goes for other fields too. I still don't like windows 8, because i felt the splash of colours annoyed me. I got it to work at work (and eventually format the company desktop to windows 7 -- i was an IT admin) but people don't like change. Windows users too. we complain, complain but then get use to it. I hated windows 10 tiles but now, i use it fully. Windows 11..i don't like it but design wise, i think it looks nice. some parts still boggles my mind. Like why keep two UIs? cannot keep one or let us choose during OOBE? I would keep control panel and have a more uniform design and update the windows explorer design. other than that, I feel i can power through it.
@@encycl07pedia- windows 8 was definitely a change in ui, it was the first windows release that started shoving mobile features into a desktop os. i want my desktop os to be an actual desktop os and not a desktop os with mobile features slapped onto it. it also killed the beautiful aero theme in favor of a flat boring theme in line with corporate oversimplification and its been roughly the same ever since. it did not bother to change the rest of the windows 7 features to fit more with its style and thus felt like windows 7 with a weird theme and a start menu hack, and 10 and 11 just kept slapping even more things onto it without removing the old (control panel still exists) leading to win11 being just an odd inconsistent mishmash of features from all the past windows versions since 7. 8 also introduced the msstore, ms accounts, telemetry, onedrive, etc but that has less to do with ui. this is all very subjective but it will always be my opinion that windows 8 is the worst windows because it started everything i hate about modern windows
I remember coming back to Linux after using a Mac for 5 years. It was like a breath of fresh air. I was so happy!
I totally agree. I work with iOS and Mac OS for work and come home to enjoy Linux.
@@samthemacman same, I'm not touching macOS unless someone is paying me
20 year Linux fan and 5 year macOS fan. With the exception of a little personal taste presented as objectivity, this was a refreshingly fair-minded review.
I've been on Linux since 2006 and on Mac since 2008. Linux is getting closer but still has a ways to go.
It's objective if you know nothing about Windows or think Windows 11 is the only Windows out there. 3:05 is either a bold-faced lie (taskbar in Windows since at least XP if not earlier has been dockable on top, bottom, left, or right.) or is only applicable to Windows 11 (I haven't used it).
Lots of other things like him acting like Windows can't do WM well just proves he doesn't know what he's talking about.
@@dragonballjiujitsu i find gnome very nice. I like mac but it is not for me
@@encycl07pedia- It's NORMAL to compare the latest of anything and when comparing older systems people tend to get specific - so basically it's not a bold-faced lie. Windows 11 Taskbar sucketh. You can't move like in previous versions. You have to install 3rd party apps for their menus (Classic dock etc).
@@df3yt That would be a legitimate criticism except he admits at the very beginning he's not using the latest Mac OS X. Windows 11 wasn't out when Big Sur was released.
Along with many useful UI features, I’ve come to believe one of the most useful features on MacOS is the universal menu bar. You always know where and how to configure your App in a consistent way, and is a time saver when learning how to use your software.
Yes, to be hella productive on Mac, you must memorize some shortcuts. Cmd + , to launch Preferences is golden. For most all apps on MacOS, this key combination launches the Apps Preference. Again, not 100% but a large percentage.
And for most all apps installed on Mac, the 'Help' menu item is consistent and useful. I know when I install an App on my Mac, I can click and search for Help about any menu command for that App, which is welcomed.
The consistency is unmatched in Linux and Windows.
Also, like others have mentioned, a simple Cmd+Tab provides a window into everything running on your Mac.
Like with anything, there are Mac alternative ways to accomplish the so called deficiencies Nick mentions that just have to be learned. When I started using Linux almost 20 years ago, I had to learn the Terminal. Even today, anyone that wants to use Linux has to learn the basics of Terminal commands.
Finally what made me switch to Mac was the availability of Apps. Let’s face it, Linux Apps are fine but lack the polish, usability, consistency and ease of use that Mac OS offers.
One thing that surprised me when testing KDE was it's shortcut manager. Basically whenever you have a Qt application (or another one that integrates with it's API), you have one central hotkey manager for both desktop and applications. It orders them by use case, warns you of collisions and even allows you to create custom commands to assign hotkeys to. Sure there is the problem of the non-API outliar but I'd argue within the system KDE does a spectacular job at being both consistent and flexible.
As far as I'm concerned, the menu bar and Spotlight are the only things Mac OS X does right. That's it. I'd rather have the ability to switch windows in a fraction of a second than put up with the resource hog Finder.
@Zaydan Naufal That was Unity? I thought Unity was the hideous UI with the comically-large buttons on the right.
@@encycl07pedia- That was NeXTSTEP aka the thing that turned into MacOS
@Zaydan Naufal It had, by the 16.04 version, the best implementation of a global menu, with the option of having the menu on the title bar if not maximized.
"While we might lack... all the breadth of applications you might get on MacOS..."
But that is the crux of the issue. Not a small, ignorable "rough edge".
I run Linux on my home system (and at work). I am willing to overlook the disjointed desktop experience (some apps respect the theme, some don't. Some deal with a global menu bar, some don't. Gnome seems hell bent on hiding all functionality behind a completely un-needed hamburger menu simply because that is fashionable, etc.) I can overlook the absolutely horrible and complex power management issues on my laptop. I can ignore the need to dip into the terminal to fix basic things like my mouse not coming back to life after I use a USB switcher. , but the fragmentation between distros - and the corresponding difficulty in getting software to actually do work (vs. simply arranging windows) is a huge issue.
Much of my software relies on me running CentOS 7. I wished I could update to a newer OS or different distro, but I can't. Some software that I WANT to run, however, is only available for Ubuntu. I can and do run flatpak (my preferred package manager for software) but not everything is available as a flatpak, and some of the stuff is packaged by a third party that I have no way of vetting.
I agree that the windowing manager is better under Linux (and I find the overall Linux user experience to have some significant advantages over MacOS), but to gloss over the packaging/fragmentation/lack of software on Linux as a less important, dismissible annoyance vs. the core reason Linux continues to fail to gain market share as a desktop OS seems like maybe placing the focus in the wrong place?
well I don't know about CentOS but have you tried some other distro? I use Arch (btw) and a HUGE repository and rolling release make me basically never miss out on any software I might need. Ubuntu probably also works pretty well for that
@@kerstinhoffmann2343 Ha! Talk about a delayed reply on my end. Apparently I am just learning to use notifications on UA-cam. :)
I used to use Arch, but the problem I have is that the commercial 3D content creation software that I rely on (Autodesk products, Houdini, Clarisse) is certified on CentOS 7 and not on Arch. So if I have any issues I am left on my own to solve them if I am not using the certified OS. Even beyond this, just the effort of sourcing the libraries and getting the software running eats into my time getting actual work done.
It is actually super frustrating since I would love to use a more mainstream Linux distro.
@@2000bvz Ah ok. That makes perfect sense
To me the biggest problem is Apple itself. Their hostile take on right to repair and difficulties of not being fully in their eco-system turn me off the most. Like no DE is perfect and you just have to pick your poison, but theirs comes with several extra stuff.
Yeah, I agree. Sadly, I’ve bought into the infrastructure/walled garden. I’m no fanboy, I know Apple’s problems and they piss me off but in the end of the day, it works. I have no problems with Linux server… I use it every day as a sysadmin/DBA. I also don’t use a lot of the crap they market as “innovations” either.
They make high quality equipment. My MBP survived someone tossing it in the trash bin! My Macs are a decade old and are the last repairable Macs on the planet.
@@NormanF62 I agree. I’m hesitant to give up my 2015 MBP. I have to see the M2 Mac Mini’s but honestly, as long as I keep getting security updates, I’m satisfied… until they start hobbling the software that is…
Because they didn't want to let go of the product they sold🤣 because if you asked me.. if I bought an Apple product for example iPhone that piece of hardware is already mine, so whatever I do with it for example change the hardware with a cheap one or put it in a oven or used it as a soap or etc then it's all up to me, because I already bought it I paid for it so whatever what I do with that piece of device Apple has nothing to do with it since I already own it, so the only thing that Apple own in that piece of device is the software so they should only prevent the users from tweaking that, that's why Apple preventing the right to repair doesn't make any sense to me🤷♂️
@@lwoklidfr1898 Apple makes a lot of money selling the illusion of security, which they could still maintain by having approved parts vendor and only those parts would work in the device. Yeah, maybe you’d pay a few bucks more for the part itself but it would allow them to preserve that illusion of security. But let’s be honest, Apple makes money by selling new hardware, which is why they discourage independent repair. They should’ve been been broken up long ago into hardware and software companies.
macOs is meant to be used with a trackpad and keyboard shortcuts. Swipe 4 fingers up for mission control and define other behavior as you want. I also recommend Spectacle (free) which allows to configure window tiling - alt left and alt right to tile the window to each side, and alt up to maximize. You can do alt dow to minimize as well. This combo is super quick, easy to use and frankly should be a default behavior. Also I can remember the last time I opened an app NOT through spotlight.
One more thing. Configure the trackpad for 3 finger dragging - so if you want to drag something you just hold it wit 3 fingers on the trackpad. I can't use a mac without this enabled
I actually really like window management on Mac OS. The fact that I can have multiple fullscreen application and switch between them at ease is super convenient to me. At this point desktop is a place I rarely visit to do some microscopic task.
Though it obviously doesn't change the fact those features are must have for most people.
It's the kind of feature I loved on my 13"Macbook, but really don't care about on my desktop. The integration with the trackpad made it as if that little laptop had multiple monitors to work on. On my desktop I actually have 2 large monitors, and I've never really been able to get into a multi-desktop workflow. I usually have enough space, and I just need to tile things correctly.
@@Niosus Rectangle is great if you don’t mind using shortcuts to control each window individually, and there’s also an auto-tiling window manager called Yabai that works well.
@@rikugo1 The MBP was retired a long time ago. It's a 2011 model. I don't even have a laptop these days, just a desktop and a tablet. But thanks for the tips, maybe someone else will come along and find it useful :)
I have multiple fullscreen applications simultaneously running on my main Linux box, and can switch between them with a single keystroke. That’s because I have KDE configured to give me 6 desktops, each with its own collection of windows. And on top of that KDE supports multiple “activities”, each with its own collection of windows across all desktops.
But those both things you can do in windows and linux distros. Now, try to minimize a app on mac and when you go to your desks, you cant find the app you just minimized. Mac is the only one that does this strange thing
I’ve been using mainly macOS for 20 years, so I thought I would disagree with a lot of this. But it’s mostly spot on. The usability of KDE Plasma and GNOME has advanced considerably in recent years, and now they are stealing good ideas from each other every week. Advancing by leaps and bounds in ways they should have been doing since more than a decade ago. But on the flip side there is a robust market of free and paid utilities that can solve pretty much any usability issue with macOS you can name. And then there remains the elephant in the room. MacOS has access to a mountain of commercial software like Adobe CC and MS Office that millions of people are forced to use by their employers or clients. But macOS could definitely learn a few things about UX from the best that Linux currently has to offer.
The real pain with MacOS commercial app is that they are least effort ports of Windows software, especially the Adobe apps.
@@fmlazar I disagree, many commercial software choices are Mac exclusives. And many are more optimized on Mac than on windows (Word being the ultimate example of this). Especially when it comes to photography or book publishing or many other creative tasks.
Adobe is bloated and sucks on any platform at the moment so that’s kind of not the best example of cross platform apps.
@@ghost-user559 Adobe still makes some of the apps most popular with people who professionally do a lot of image editing.
@@a0flj0 Very true. I prefer Adobe, but Affinity just makes more financial sense overall as a one time purchase. There is no reason whatsoever that I can no longer purchase the Creative Suite except corporate greed. The experience I had with Adobe means I will now literally do anything in my power to avoid using them ever again. And the more “updated” it becomes, the more bloated and clunky it is. They are the industry standard because they got their first, not because they are a company people admire or emotionally support any longer.
@@ghost-user559 Talk to professional users. Most prefer Adobe specifically because it is packed with features.
I have been a macOS user for the last 3 years, and this was hard to watch :D. But I do agree on most points to be fair. Window management is an absolute flaming pile of crap. There are free (Rectangle) and paid solutions (Magnet) to fix that, and they do it really well with keyboard shortcuts without cutting into performance or being too intrusive with the applications themselves (credit where credit's due). Howbeit, it is preposterous that macOS does not have this built-in in 2022. It would be surprising if they added it in macOS 13. The other thing I absolutely detest is the menu bar situation. It is massively annoying to scroll all the way to the top if I have a window snapped to the bottom half of a 34-inch monitor. It clearly goes on to show that window snapping and tiling were never meant to be featured on mac.
You raised a good point about installing apps. There is a lack of coherency between how installers work. Some application distributions actually have installers which copy files all over (the /usr/bin, /usr/local/bin etc.) and also place the application package contents in the /Applications directory. However, others are "portable" so to speak, expecting you to mount the disk image and copy-paste the app contents directly. Others work with the AppStore and it doesn't install it the same way as others. Don't even get me started on package managers. Brew and MacPorts are good at what they do, and I do use them almost weekly, but installation paths are a nightmare.
Also, as powerful as Spotlight search is, free applications like Raycast/ Albert take it to the next level with app-level shortcuts and plugins. Safari might be efficient, but my god is it ancient underneath at this point.
This is controversial but I think we need to remember that people don't buy systems because one OS is better than the other, and it is a silly argument and a comparison for anyone who knows anything about computing. People buy computers to get work done. There are less than 2-3 mainstream manufacturers who ship laptops with a Linux distribution installed. On top of that, most people are used to Windows or Mac from work/ school. Also, adding to the shaky reputation and reliability of budget laptop hardware (I have been stung by that hard thrice), makes a compelling case for people to buy an M1 equipped Macbook Air, which has killer performance for the price. Also add to that resale value, overall hardware experience (trackpad, screen, speakers, device integration and support for third-party accessories). And then comes mainstream app support, which no one will EVER sacrifice just because there is a good alternative. The existence of an OpenSource alternative does not compel anyone at all to switch workflows just because of the virtue of it being free. Most people don't care for it, me included.
More than 99% of computer users are not nerds. Most of us like to get our work done without having to spend 5 months tweaking the system to get it to absolute perfection. Not saying Linux distros are difficult, but remember, most people don't have any experience or don't want anything to do with installing OSs. So, it is a self-feeding cycle.
All said I am excited about Asahi coming to Macbooks natively!
I understand why people don't necessarily feel comfortable installing their own os. It's a bit outside the normal things most people do with their computer, but it is pretty easy nowadays, and there are many advantages to linux that are hard to see from the outside, which is why people who use it love it so much, even if they are in the minority
@porteal Don't get me wrong. I love all 3 OSs for their strengths (I daily drive all 3), and despise them where deserved. But trust me as someone who teaches computing, programming and other things in general to people all the way from 6 to 70+ years, people don't like doing "things" with their computers, many developers included. Unless you "spoon feed" someone linux which is close to what they are used to, and do not have to touch the terminal, people will not use it. The mere existence of something good or better is not an incentive for most people to switch.
@@MrProximace I agree that that is the main barrier keeping people from using linux
I agree with all of the above mentioned points, especially with the installation of apps. Also, I want to point out that starting from macOS Monterey, you get a option in System Preferences to choose if you want to keep the menu bar visible permanently on full screen apps or you like the default configuration where the menu bar is visible on hover.
@@MrProximace I mean, I kind of find it ridiculous that people don't know how to install an OS. I'm not saying they should be manually installing arch or something. but installing an OS should be common knowledge.
Have you tried Homebrew on macOS? It acts like a package manager, similar to apt. You can load all the FOSS apps (both command line and GUI) via this.
Using Homebrew on Mac OS X just proves you should've used Linux or BSD instead.
Always recommended macports over homebrew myself, it's just cleaner, smarter, more thought out where as homebrew makes a lot of security compromises in the name of not using "sudo" and using integrated apple libraries...
@@encycl07pedia- true
Let me try to explain the Apple mission control logic:
People don't understand virtual workspaces, so they pile everything into one workspace.
If you want to hide a window, open another window and the previous window is now below it.
If you want to find the previous window, open mission control and it would show all three thousand windows in the current workspace, so you can find it and click it.
If you want to maximize a window, you probably don't want to use another window at the same time, so a new workspace is created and your window is thrown there full screen.
If you want to switch between a full screen window and another window, just switch as if switching workspaces.
If you don't like the default behavior, then…
Go use a third party tool…
I was a Windows user for a good time, then I migrated to Linux for a lot of years, then starting to use macOS on 2011, I think people complains about window management on macOS is pointless because desktop metaphor on macOS and Apple is very different, the "zoom" feature is to do a best fit of the content, not covering the whole screen, if you need that use fullscreen function... if you insist that you want a "maximise" feature like Windows or Linux you have either a way to mimic that or pay for a 3rd party software, don't blame Apple for that...
@@adanmirandaespindola521 it also doesn’t make sense all the time to maximize the window on macs. macOS apps are usually document based. Apps can have multiple documents or windows open at any given time. It’s why when you close the all app windows it may not actually close the app like on Linux or Windows. It’s also why the global file menu exists.
Really smart analysis and many interesting points. So, what's, in your opinion, the best desktop environment?
I think is the one with a minimalistic UX but without loss of functionalities, but I can't give a name
My biggest gripe with the interface on MacOS is that the key combination to close a tab in Safari is Command+W and the combination to quit a program is Command+Q....YET, it doesn't prompt you if you accidentally hit Command+Q instead of Command+W. It just closes out all of your tabs at once. This is a horrible oversight. Yes, I could just use Waterfox or some other browser (which I do), but it's the principle of the matter.
And automatic tiling would be great! I think there's an app to have that feature added, but I believe you have to buy it?
The automatic tilling app you mentioned is amethyst I believe. It's free (and open source). Works great!
I agree with almost all things you said about window management.
The thing is that it does not show its age, it shows the weird decisions Apple makes. The could easily implement a much better window management system. Why they don't? nobody knows.
The store never got the love it deserves from the devs, I guess mostly because of the yearly fee someone needs to pay to get their app on there.
Most power users are going with brew (similar to aur). Not everything is there but there are plenty. and there s an app i think that provides a guide for it if you don't like the terminal
@CessNight5672 true indeed
@Gabriel Eder never thought that this could be patented
Thanks for the review and for your channel, great work as usual.
10:10 you need to do alt+right arrow or left arrow to move between desktops without getting out of mission control, this is a lot more intuitive with a trackpad on macbooks with gestures.
Using CMD + H to hide an application instead of minimizing it is the ideal situation on macOS. Although it has its own limitations like for example it hides all the windows for that application and you must have at least one application shown.
It stills bad, you cant find it on your working desks
The alt resize is a old feature from macos prior to 10.6 or so. Before that there effectively was no maximize window button as Apple thought that most of the users do not actually want to maximize application windows to the full screen area. Instead this button was delegated to a "smart resize" button where the software developer would decide what's the larger most optimal size of the window when pressed. I named the button "resize random" because in reality it was depending on too many factors making it rather unpredictable until pressed.
There's a lot of applications that, on being started, check whether they are ran from the original dmg and offer to copy themselves to the Applications folder. But there are cases where you just want to try or one-shot use an application before copying it into the applications folder, so it's nice that that's possible as well. Also, the out-of-the-box window management sucks, but there's a great window manager called Magnet which is usually the first thing I install on a new macOS installation.
What do you think about trackers in GNOME desktop? Is it a security leak agent? Or a good thing? Should we delete trackers in GNOME?
8:30 You maximize a window by double clicking on any empty part of the top bar of that window. Still bad. But the functionality exists, at least.
Also, I've noticed that the workspaces of fullscreened apps don't stay in consistent order. If I recall correctly, I had two separate fullscreened windows from the same app, and it just placed the most recent one to the left all the time.
That was a silly complaint on his part because using a double click on the title bar to maximize or restore has been working on Linux and Windows as well for at least 20 years.
Sometimes on Linux you get rollup/rolldown but the behaviour has always been configurable.
I actually prefer fullscreen over maximize. When an app goes fullscreen in macOS, it creates a new virtual desktop for itself, which means that I can switch back to the previous virtual desktop very easily, using either ctrl+arrow keys or a trackpad gesture. Fullscreen gives me a little bit more screen real estate than maximize, which is very important on a laptop.
GNOME has fullscreen mode as well, but the app goes fullscreen in the existing virtual desktop, covering up the apps behind it. This adds an extra step if I want to access the apps behind it. And don't even get me started on fullscreen mode in Windows...
I also like the way full screen apps work in macOS, but I don't like the way they automatically open in another workspace because this creates inconsistency with workspace keyboard shortcuts. I actually like being able to have more than one full screen app on a workspace as is the case in Gnome. I do like the way you can reorder workspaces on the Mac though.
@@rikugo1 You can turn that off in MacOS under settings I believe. I think it’s under the section with spaces and mission control.
Nice video. What about multi-screen support in macOS? I am considering a mini, but my workflow requires proper multi screen support, and also for window management.
Solid review/comparison! I enjoyed learning stuff.
On MacOS to minimise/hide 1 single app, I use Option and then click on the desired app in the global bar. To minimise/hide all other apps, except one, I hold Option-Command, then click the one app I want to keep. Keep up the cool info flow, hope to see more Linux/Mac info here.
(MacOS/Linux user here)
Some unorganized thoughts from a former Mac guy:
* Maximize on Mac has always been app and not OS driven. Makes sense sometimes when windows have size or aspect restrictions. This ends up being a mixed bag. Sometimes apps handle this nicely, and sometimes they don't. I feel like both options kinda suck personally. :-\
* A bunch of the really weird features like mission control, the fullscreen or split screen modes came straight out of iOS. They kinda ruined the Mac for me honestly... Instead of making things better, they chose to make it more like a tablet OS without making the features work well with mouse and keyboard input.
* ".app" packages are great! A lot of Mac users *hate* installers and don't trust them. It's not uncommon for stuff ported from Windows to use them to install crap all around on your drive. Apple does provide a standard installer infrastructure for ".pkg" files, but devs tend to avoid it on purpose unless they really need to install system components. Speaking as a paranoid type, I would always extract them by hand so that they couldn't install crap all around my drive. >_>
* Running apps from a dmg is generally fine... if kinda dumb. Apps are *not* suppose to write anything to their parent folder as non-admin users don't have write access to /Applications. The exceptions are usually stuff ported from Windows since... restricting write access to unprivileged users still seems to be a new idea to Windows devs.
* App Store + all the code signing crap... Ugh. This is the most significant reason I quit the Mac. We used to be able to sell Mac shareware and make a mild living off of it. When the app store came to the Mac, you lived and died by Apple choosing to feature you. It all dried up for us months after the app store launched. It's like winning the lottery now. :(
* I'm amused how passionate Linux folks get about Window management. :) In the last 30 years, I can think of just a single Windows user I knew that was passionate about this. In the Linux world it comes up regularly. Same with sytem theming. Hehe
linux users are likely passionate cause its very easy to get used to it,its not like an app you can just re-learn,its just a basic way of using any PC
When I first tried OS X (as it was called then), I noticed a peculiar bug, I’m not sure if it’s been fixed yet.
Try opening 2 apps, say A and B, such that you have 2 windows open in A, call them A1 and A2, and one window in B. Stack them so A1 is at the bottom, then B overlapping it, then A2 at the top.
Now close A2. Which window comes to the top? You would expect it to be B, but for some reason it would be A1 instead.
Does that still happen?
@@lawrencedoliveiro9104 Yes. I don't consider that a bug though. Mac has always been application and not window focused. Closing a window in general does not cause an application to lose input focus (menu bar, etc) even if it's the last window. It drives Mac users crazy how closing a window causes you to accidentally switch or quit applications in other OSes. For example, if you want to close a document, then open or create a new one... nope you switched applications instead. (Grrr)
@@lawrencedoliveiro9104 Still does that thing, that is the only thing not making sense to me of the window management on macOS xD
I switched from linux as my daily driver to macOS back in November 2020. I was running linux exclusively at home from 2015 until then. The window management is bad, as you note, though there are extensions that can solve that. The main reason I switched: working from home. I refuse to use the shitty ThinkPad T580 my work issued me - it's loud, somewhat slow at times, and just not very nice hardware in terms of the keyboard and the touchpad is trash as every non-Apple laptop's is. We use almost all web apps (Microsoft, unfortunately) along with Teams. Linux (and I tried every distro available at the time) just didn't work well with Teams or some other apps I had to use for work. Teams *looks* like it works....until you try to share you screen with others and all they see is a black screen! That was due to the Xorg vs Wayland shit that was going on at the time. Hopefully they've solved that but still, moved on for now and many others have as well.
The window management and file explorer (i.e., Finder) in mac suck. And it sucks not having the free/open source community. But aside from those two things, everything in the apple ecosystem is better IMO. You understated the interoperability benefits. I wake up, come down to start work, jiggle my bluetooth mouse or hit a key on my bluetooth keyboard (I run my Mac in clamshell mode 90% of the time and use it as a desktop replacement) and then I immediately hear and feel my Apple Watch notify my it has unlocked my mac. I take a photo on my iPhone and move it to my mac....when on linux I had to email it to myself, or save it to cloud storage, etc...on mac I just airdrop it - takes seconds and is so convenient. I no longer need a document scanner - I just navigate in macOS to the directory I want to scan a document into, click a button to "Scan from iPhone" and boom - my phone wakes up, opens the camera app, and is ready to scan. I scan however many pages I want (which is always perfect due to the camera quality), hit save, and boom - the scan appears as a pdf on my mac. These are just SOME examples of interoparability.
BTW - mac hardware is 1000x better than anything else and it's not even close. I've used top of the line Dell's and no, they aren't close even still to mac laptop hardware (and the Dell's that try are more expensive).
All that said - Apple IS a walled garden. I get that and if I were retired/not working I would go back to linux purely for that reason. I like gnome a lot, Cinnamon is okay, and I just saw that Unity just had a release - that was the best linux DE! When I no longer have to work as part of a team with others who are using Windows then yeah, I'll go back to linux. But I'll definitely miss the apple hardware and a lot of the software is great too.
Which shell (if any) is there by default? For 90% of my work both on *ixes and Windows I use command line - I am not a graphics designer, photographer nor video editor.
This year I bought a MacBook Pro M1 Pro. The default photo icon thumbnail size for Finder is tiny. It is just 64 x 64 pixels. So, in the Finder I went to View | Show View Options and made it larger and made it the default. When using Finder directly all is good, but then when I need to upload a photo to a forum, on Facebook, adding to an email, etc. a Finder window pops up with the original tiny 64 pixel thumbnails that you can select for the upload. That window ignores the thumbnail/icon size setting so you just get tiny, very hard to see thumbnails. 😞
You can keep the bar on top persistent in full screen apps now. Windows has the patent for windows snapping in commercial products, so unless it’s an open source package that is free they can’t bundle a snapping system into their windows managers, this is not me defending the decision not to have it by default (I use amethyst btw) it’s just an explanation as to why
Sounds very interesting that they can’t do it due to Microsoft’s patent. I do think chromeOS has window snapping regardless?
@@endless_puns the thing this chromeOS is it’s built on an open source project and it can be argued easily that ChromeOS is free and not a commercial product so to speak, Apple refuses to say their OS is free and it has to be run on their products only not just off the shelf components
You can use Dock Exposé / DockAltTab to provide previews on the macOS dock, as well as enabling clicking dock icons to minimize apps. Rectangle for window snapping.
thanks for the tip on dock expose
My biggest gripe with MacOS is when I full-screen videos, for example from UA-cam, and it has to play the long animation and move the playing video to a new full screen space. Then, when I command-tab to a different window, it switches back to the previous workspace. But when I command tab back to my browser app, which usually has multiple windows open. It switches not to my most recently active browser window but to my most recently active browser window in my current workspace, which is not want I want.
I really appreciate your insights and perspective on MacOS. Thanks for the video!
One thing I would consider a plus for Mac OS, is the ability to run adobe software. I would love adobe software to run on Linux and would use it there if possible, but until that happens I'm forced to use either Windows or Mac OS for part of my work flow.
And no. I don't expect adobe to ever develop their applications for Linux. :-(
That's definitely an advantage
I'd be content with the Affinity Suite to run on Linux. Serif has said they're still trying to iron out a business model for Linux porting that would work. They haven't figured it out yet. Their devs are all certified in the world of Apple and Microsoft. Linux is not up to par in the college education world. For decades, schools got special funding in favor of shilling for Microsoft. Old habits die hard. Especially in state universities.
dang... you beat me to it. I literally partially scripted this exact video from my PoV for producing once I'm not busy developing stuff again.
PS: Obviously I'm still gonna do it.
Also ayy lmao you also commented on the lack of Minimise on Click on Dock... that's literally one of the things I comment about in my script thus far... jokingly pointing out maybe THAT'S why Ubuntu does not either.
You can still make the video.
Make it
Really enjoyed this review, both showing what Linux does better as well as what Linux can learn from (and the points you make for the latter I agree with).
i find the window management practical when i use my mac as a laptop since i want to fullscreen my apps to maximize screen usage anyway and rarely need to use more than two apps side by side at the same time. However when i plug it into my 34" ultrawide i do miss better window management and miss being able to have 3 or 4 apps side by side in the full screen mode.
I think this nicely shows 2 trends:
First the macOS desktop was the leading most modern and influencial UI for a desktop OS and is loosing ground and probably will soon or already has lost that lead on UI depending on your personal preferences. This i think has a lot to do with the changes in apples top management.
The second is harder to see from the video but still makes a lot of sense in my humble mind and it is a shift of the focus from the desktop to smartphone or more general speaking Touch UI. In that for me apples still has the lead with the smoothest and most user friendly UI up to now.
PS: Luckily you didn't compared apples with oranges( unity).
More seriosly i am really happy how many choices you have based on your preferences for desktop UIs on Linux like Gnome, KDE, XFCE, Cinnamon, Mate, Budgie, Pantheon, Enlightment, Deepin, LXDE and someone is always pissed not mentioned his prefered one still. New ones are on the way like the one from Pop OS which bring in new ideas and the best of all some of them like Gnome and KDE even work together on the parts were it makes the most sense without loosing there conceptual different approaches to user interfaces.
I'd argue that macOS is meant to be used with a trackpad. The window management does kinda suck with a regular mouse, but it feels much better than many other window manager I've used on a laptop with not a ton of screen real estate and a trackpad.
I use the trackpad or magic trackpad 2 and think - with gestures and keyboard shortcuts - and I still think window management is bad on a Mac. It's almost - but not quite - enough to make me switch away from Mac.
As with most operating systems, customizing fixes all the issues. Magnet + keyboard shortcuts makes window management better, and if you really want you can find a mac "tiling" manager
Interesting video, thanks ! I like you pointing out what would be better (and each time I say to myself “mhh I just don't care because I have shortcuts for that / i use terminal as my main workspace”)
You can switch desktops from mission control. With 3 fingers on the trackpad, or with control-left/right arrow. That makes moving apps from desktop to desktop kind of bearable. But you can set a shortcut yourself. If you care about these things, you probably want some shortcuts (and there is a “kind of tiling WM” for macOS that is called amethyst. And there is yabai, but then you need some more configuration).
I have to say, I totally agree with most of your review here. I work across Windows 10 and 11, Fedora GNOME and MacOS and by far MacOS is my least favourite!
You can maximise windows by double clicking the window top bar, at least in Monterey. But the window management is awful in MacOS.
The AppStore is mostly "m'eh" once I have the apps I need I'm not going there to notice or care and most apps I install using brew.
Everything else is fine and mostly works but the Window and task management is so terrible I swear at MacOS every day
@@terrydaktyllus1320 LMFAO! A Mac apologist saying Windows users have Stockholm syndrome. That's just hilarious. It's also funny that you blame Windows on you or your wife getting malware (quite possibly a trojan) that plays ads in the file browser. That's not a Windows thing. 100% PEBMAC.
Windows 7, not Windows XP, was the apex of the Windows experience. It's been downhill since then but even Windows 8 had better window management than OS X. Windows 10 is sluggish and crappy on an HDD because the geniuses thought it should be installed on SSDs (real boneheads).
@@terrydaktyllus1320 What were you trying to say, PEBMAC? I'm not a Windows fanboy, either. I've been running only Debian or Linux Mint for years.
Well done Nick! My experience of MacOS is very similar. I bought a Mac Mini for music purposes, but was annoyed by the OS updates, so I installed Ubuntu Mate on it as I wanted be in control of what is updated and when. during my recordings of my first vinyl! :)
There's an option to pause automatic updates on macOS
@@alex.x8782 Ok, but at the time I was using MacOS, not much could be changed. It still download in background.
@@alex.x8782 I have recommended Macs many time to people that just want to have a computer that works and have money to pay for it. Nowadays I think I would recommend Chomebooks instead for people that just need a broswer,
Hi, I am currently in the process of switching from macOS to Linux (Fedora). I really enjoy both the content of your videos and the positive vibe. Keep up the good work!
The desktop management philosophy of Gnome and MacOS are very different. In Gnome there are virtual "Desktops", but in macOS there are "Spaces". A space may be a Desktop or a full screen application like in iOS. AFAIK, there is no such thing as a full screen application like macOS in Gnome. This, I find is the main point of confusion. I do not suggest that one is better than the other, but the overall mentalities are very different.
Thanks again for the great content.
Re minimizing: cmd+m, faster than clicking :)
The strongest feature of MacOS for me is the preview. There is no program like preview in Linux. No, it doesn't just "preview files".
It is a fully fletched PDF reader, allows you to remove pages, reorder them, insert signatures. It has photo editing features and so much more.
Also, the search bar/spotlight is far more functional than equivalent in Gnome.
The finder also has "tags", which don't exist in linux or windows either.
The only good thing about gnome is it's animations. I struggle to find anything close to Krunner on other OS's or DE's.
Okular is the universal document reader for Linux. View PDF, DJVU, CBx, office formats and just about everything.
@@lawrencedoliveiro9104 Preview is not just a reader though, is always installed, and works with more formats than anything else.
@@cassandrasinclair8722 Okular is just a reader. Think of it as doing one job, and doing it well. If I want to create/modify those file formats, I have plenty of other tools, more versatile than your inflexible, bloated monolith.
For me an app that totally needs to be sherlocked by Apple is "Magnet" it gives you all the hot keys and stuff and drag stuff for window arrangement/tiling stuff. It is one of the few apps I think is essential to MacOS... a lot like a lot of people feel about bartender
Magnet is the bombdiggity.
I just want to say in general, MacOS is only limiting if you don't learn the keyboard shortcuts for everything or make your own. And since all apps are forced to use that global menubar, they are also forced to let you change the keyboard shortcuts for any 3rd party apps menubar options via the System Preferences.
Coming from Linux, there's also the terminal which you should already be familiar with, and Apple makes it easy with the Automator app to do all kinds of stuff with shell scripts.
E.g. Apple TV has a nice library overview for all of your video files, but can't handle mkv files, so I wrote a bash script that converts them using ffmpeg, placing them in the "Add to Apple TV" folder, and Automator adds that as a one-click shortcut to any video file in Finder.
any time ive tried it has only worked in half the apps, or i was told not to do that. im sorry that i have 20 years of muscle memory and apple has terrible shortcut keys, i really hate using it
@@user-gv7se2tp6t I can only recall one time it didn't work, and that is when I was using Microsoft Word on MacOS, and I wanted to set a keybinds for the MacOS "Zoom" functionality (a.k.a. maximize on Windows and Linux), but it wouldn't work because there were 2 "Zoom" items throughout the menu bar for that app: one to actually set the zoom of the page and one to maximize the window. Creating a custom keyboard shortcut for "Zoom" only sets it to the first occurrence of it in the menu bar.
My solution: I stopped using Microsoft Word
@@user-gv7se2tp6t What I love about MacOS keyboard shortcuts is that they are more ergonomic than having to use my pinky for the Ctrl key for almost every keyboard shortcut. The Apple keyboards have a shorter spacebar to make room for the Command key to sit within easy reach of my thumbs. And with that thumb resting on either command key, I can pivot my left hand to reach any key on the keyboard without having my elbows contort inward like I would if I had to use the Ctrl key on Windows and Linux
@@user-gv7se2tp6t I've tried rebinding the Alt key to act as Ctrl for Windows and Linux before, but that just messes with my Alt-tab functionality, of of my most used keybinds. The second reason why I don't do that is because for non-Apple keyboards Alt is not as comfortable to press with my thumb as the Command key is because the spacebar is longer on non-Apple keyboards.
I don't like the menu bar at the top of the screen. It might have made sense in the days when most applications had menus but no toolbars, but now applications have menus and toolbars, and it makes no sense to have the menu separated from the toolbar.
You are a "We can disagree but still can be friends" type of guy. I'm a windows user but still love your passion about linux and trying other new stuffs like macOS or windows. Keep up.
I had one of the first Intel MBPs back in 2007 and am daily driving a Mid 2014 MBP. I feel like the window management was actually a little better when MacOS went by big cats.
True. I can’t remember which version changed the green button to fullscreen but no one on the planet liked it and I never figured out how to fix it. That was the same time when they introduced slow animations for things like opening Safari 🤢
It is possible to maximize a window without hiding the dock etc. by dragging it to the top of the screen or double clicking to top bar of the application.
But yes, I do agree the window management on Mac is way behind on it's compertitors
To me, the menus are "a part of the application" rather than "a part of the operating system." So when I'm on Linux or Windows I'm not "hunting" for them - they're at the top of the window for the application. So what do I do when I want to access the menu on an unfocused application? On Windows / Linux, it's easy: Click on the menu. On a Mac? Not sure. Do I have to click on the app first to focus it or something? That really sounds like a more troublesome experience.
I agree that "hunting" for the menu is not really a problem. I still like the global menu though. Some applications, like file managers, typically don't have their own always-visible menus nowadays as they're not wide enough. The global menu solves that problem as it has plenty of space at the top of the screen. And apps integrate well with it as it's the default in MacOS. A while ago I tried enabling the global menu in KDE but it was inconsistent, e.g. Firefox didn't have any menu items.
Wasn't expecting this 😎 great video.
Totally agree with your window tiling comments. Personally I think they never bothered to work on that because they assumed working on 1 screen with 1 window was what most people did. Now that they are getting a bit more serious about multi monitor setups it seems like the next logical step in the next major release. That's what I hope at least 😎
This is what I think too. MacOS is really optimized for use on a small laptop screen and using gestures and keyboard shortcuts to switch between fullscreen windows and desktops. I actually prefer not to hook it up to an external display when I'm trying to be productive. Meanwhile if I'm on Windows, I hate using it on a laptop. I have a much better time hooked up to a large external display and keep all windows on a single desktop.
I feel like Magnet fixes a lot of the window management complaints though. And if you use macOS on an external display it's much better if you use Apple's peripherals like the Magic Mouse or Trackpad.
Try minimizing a couple of windows. Then do the exposé effect to see all your open windows. Minimized windows aren’t there. Completely idiotic when what I want is an overview of all my windows including the ones I minimized in order to declutter this ungodly mess of a desktop.
I feel the opposite way. Windows shows minimized windows in the task view and alt tab views… that makes zero sense to me.
@@DiogoExMarques but those systems you mentioned are there to switch tasks, and minimized tasks are still tasks.
One thing I love about macOS is how the zoom button works and how if you hold it down it’ll create a new workspace you can split or just use that application as a fullscreen app. It’s not like the most important thing but it feels a lot less clunky than other fullscreen implementation.
With mission control using ctrl + arrow key or 3-finger swipe on trackpad works to switch the virtual desktop while staying in mission control. If your Dock is in auto-hide mode then the window zoom(alt green button or double click window title bar) behaviour should be similar to window maximise behaviour expected.
Ehmm, macOS 10.14 Mojave that I'm using (3 versions behind yours) has drag to tile feature. Did they... removed it?
I think it might be a third party tool :)
@@TheLinuxEXP lol, do you think this is what apple users are? Using a third party tool without realizing it?
I should have made myself clearer though. What I mean is that mine works identical to yours, except instead of having a small menu popped up over the green stoplight, I get to drag the window to left or right screen area
This is where the difference between UI and UX comes into play. The User Interface on macOS is arguably better than any Linux distro if for no other reason because, as Nick said, app developers actually care how their apps look on macOS. This leads to a more consistent look and feel across applications. The global menu, the monochrome status icons, the various widget sizes that stack perfectly, the consistently rounded corners of every application - all these things lead to a better overall UI. However, Nick pointed out all the user experience (UX) issues with macOS that have not been fixed over the years, the worse offender being window management which I agree is absolutely awful out of the box on macOS.
However, some of these UX pieces are made better by the excellent trackpad that comes with the macbooks. And the UX is further enhanced by the integration between macOS and other apple products. Apple's laptops also have a very, very good build quailty and with the release of M1, they also have great performance and unparalleled battery life. Sleep and hibernate on macOS is years ahead of windows or linux. It almost feels like macOS is designed with the Macbook in mind. That said, it is not an excuse to have all of these issues that have gone unfixed or unimproved for years and Apple really should do better.
I had a discussion about M1's performance, recently, with a OSX fan. Ryzen runs rounds around it. The only thing M1 has on its side is power consumption. However, my Asus ROG with Ryzen 9 has a large enough battery to give me several hours of full screen video watching (using Linux). OTOH, I was forced to use OSX a while ago, for a year, on a MacBook pro. The manufacturing of the hardware is exquisite, but even the hardware has usability problems - after hours of using the laptop, my wrists were hurting from the sharp edge of the aluminum case.
@@a0flj0 I would be interested in knowing whether you throttle or lose power unplugged. Traditionally that has been the biggest issue when it comes to other manufacturers. Apple gives you the same performance plugged in or not. Most of the other manufacturers did amazing while plugged in but performance was far worse once on battery.
@@ghost-user559 Never had that. Processor frequency is only decreased when the battery was close to empty, IME. The screen often gets dimmed instantly when you plug out the power source, but you can change that in any modern non-Apple OS via power settings.
@@a0flj0 That’s good to know. I’ll have to look up the manufactures that throttle when unplugged. I watched the comparison about a year ago or more.
I think they were “gaming laptops” so idk if that has anything to do with the differences? Perhaps they use a different gpu for some models when unplugged for certain manufacturers?
I am generally hardware agnostic although I prefer Apple as an ecosystem for work, I would definitely be in the market for a PC to game.
More so when Steam OS and Linux catch up because I despise Windows at this point. But ironically I think Microsoft does very well with consoles so I don’t know if they just have more resources on their gaming than their actual desktop at this point?
Floating windows is the way Mac OS has worked since System 6. Once you’ve used this for about 30 years you really don’t want it messed up. I prefer to work in floating windows and never use them full screen. I can always see what’s open and running on the same workspace. I love window management in Windows, but I use my windows the same way in windows. It’s really a workflow style that you develop of a user. There are quirks of Mac OS that really have travelled with the OS and it’s users since the time of MacOS on its 68k machines. But to each their own. But MacOS usually plays well with third party tools.
The answer to window management on Mac is to download an app to restore the functionality. They should obviously do that by default, but the apps I've used are great, and free so it's no a deal breaker.
In kde it's possible to make krunner appear in the middle of your screen. Just launch it and then there you will find a settings option. Click on it and then change the location from top to center. I'm never switching from KDE anymore
Reviewers seem to want things to be constantly changing (so they have something to write about?), however regular users might prefer consistency rather than a constant flow of new features and ways of working. Most people don't use all the various interface functions anyway, they're too busy doing what they need to do!
I'm glad I watched this.
I have had a (probably unfairly) negative impression of Apple since I was a kid in the '80s. I remember finding the whole experience infuriating: crazy single button mouse, no terminal, etc. I mean, I could have figured it out, but why bother if I already have access to something that does what I want. And then there's the whole expansion/customization and repair aspect that put further distance between me and Apple.
I was thinking about picking up a Mac Mini to play around with, but I'm gonna pass on that after watching this video. Looks like the experience doesn't have much to offer me.
btw, I'm on Windows 10 for work and Fedora Gnome on my personal equipment.
Not sure if this would be useful for anyone. But if you want better window management on MacOS, I recommend Rectangle, and Amethyst depending on what you like (I use both depending on the thing I am doing). Amethyst brings the feel of a tiling window manager, which while not analogous, do feel like i3/sway. Rectangle brings the snapping feature to mac, while also having lots of window configuration options to map keyboard short cuts to. Window management should be built in yes, but there are free solutions that do give you some choice depending how you prefer to work over on linux.
Nick, if you hold the Option key you’ll get a different set of options in the context menu that pops up from the green button, that will just move the window to the left or right side, and won’t try to force tiling. “Make Fullscreen” will also change to “Zoom”, the lame macOS version of maximize that was inherited from Classic Mac OS. And you don’t actually need to long-press the green button. The context menu will appear if you just hover over the green button for a second. When in doubt in macOS, ALWAYS try the Option key. Many menus have items that change when the Option key is held down.
I agree most of the part with the review Nick! The reason why Apple's choice of not tiling the window apps is stated long time from Steve Jobs where he prefered having all the window apps to be floating instead of being stacked, because that would help Unix systems approach to the era of GUI apps.
I will cover this topic in my next video (this profile channel)
your channel seems interesting and i'd like to watch it but your audio quality hurts me.
@@gsgrzegorz98 thanks! There is a problem with my device, I'll try to fix it! However, a little support and generous comment like yours are always appreciated! ✌️🙂
When I've first used OSX 7 years ago my first thought was: "it's even less configurable than Gnome". Since then it improved a bit in some areas and broke in other (like support for 32bit apps). Still after those years I prefer Linux with KDE 🙂.
And yes window management is a disaster. installation of Spectacle helps a lot in this area.
It's a colour code: red is stop, orange is hold and green is go. Since they emphasize on their desktop looking the same everywhere, it makes sense they force a full screen when you press the green button. Most of us are used to a different concept, coming from windows where the desktop "prettyness" is not that important. This would also explain why tiling must be between 2 windows, a single window would break the harmony Apple is forcing on the main desktop.
Hey there @nick, could you please create a video on how to set up btrfs snapper snapshots in fedora. The btrfs with fedora is not used to its fullest without snapshot and recovery configuration.
As somebody who uses a mac for work (I am forced to do it), this is spot on, especially the window managing part. Mac is so much worse than Linux or Windows.
I didn't like Mac and IOS the moment I got my hands on it. Meanwhile I was perfectly ok with stock GNOME which is fairly similar. GNOME just does it much better imo. Given I still use things like Dash To Panel in GNOME, but I can live without them if I so choose. With extensions, there is a decent bit of customization available, and it's fully free and open source, unlike what you'd get on a Windows or Mac. As for KDE, idk what it is about it but I just don't like it. The whole point I switched was for a more minimalist stock environment but without sacrificing customizability much (so if I need something I can easily enable it / add it). At the same time, I don't like many of the GNOME apps, but love the KDE ones (that don't start with K). For example, GwenView and SMPlayer are in a completely different league to whatever image and video viewer GNOME offers. So what I do is run GNOME with a bunch of extensions to mimick Windows to a degree and offer more options, and use some KDE apps instead of the GNOME ones. Best of all worlds I'd say.
One of the biggest beefs I have with KDE is how chaotic is is. The apps that start with a "k", and where / how their configs are saved. So many of KDE's applets / functionalities keep track of what you open, what location you go to etc., and all of that are things I don't want. I don't want recent files, history, file indexing, searching anything but my installed apps (in the start menu) and privacy-related things like that. I found this to be less prevalent in GNOME and easier to get rid of. So that's defiantly a big factor. It all goes back to GNOME being more minimalist by default. I may come from Windows but even there I have taken special care to disable things like that through the registry etc. IMO, none of what I listed here should be things enabled by default in any operating system.
You can't really make DMGs ask if you want the contents moved to the Applications folder, because DMG isn't some sort of an installer. It's just a disk image.
But yea, the defaults in macOS are often stupid. You pretty much have to just load up your OS with a bunch of 3rd party apps to handle the things macOS refuses to do properly.
Bad Window management? There's Rectangle if you want something simple, or Amethyst if you want something along the lines of xmonad. Don't want to mess with DMGs? Try homebrew, it might be there. It's definitely not ideal that you have to rely on 3rd parties to do things that the OS itself should be doing, but it's something.
The real issue comes when you hit something that can't be changed. Don't like the Dock? Well, tough luck, you ain't changing it since all 3rd party Dock replacements are extremely buggy.
But overall macOS is just *different* and many people will swear by its idiosyncrasies. Such as the app installation process. Installers are seen as evil, dragging one thing to another thing is simple and predictable.
Open apps on dmg file some users feel that weird, but is not, you can also run Windows software from ISO file, external media without install them, dragging apps to install them is not bad in fact is very simple; some apps requires change the system or do a custom setup... that's where the user gets confused and is kind of hard to resolve.
Changing more rooted things as the dock or even the menubar will break the OS experience or make it unusable, try that on Windows to change the "explorer taskbar" sure you can but beware of unexpected issues, so on Linux side this is a winning point a lot of flexibility.
People complaining that macOS does not behave like Windows or Linux is a nonsense, because as you pointed macOS is different, that's all... Windows and Linux UIs are similar, specially because some Linux desktops evolve to appear more friendly to Windows userbase, you can also try on Linux less known desktop managers and you'll see they behave totally different than macOS or Windows
Btw you *can* install some different WM (but you’re forced to still keep Quartz, so the experience is similar outside of the windows being managed) like yabai, Amerhyst. You can even install DWM if you really really want to, but it will only run on XServer windows. I do know one person who for some reason doesn’t just dualboot and runs recompiled Linux apps on macOS in an XServer instance and if they’re running it full screen they use DWM for window management.
After unzipping or extracting an app from a dmg, you can open unsigned/unrecognised apps without going through the settings app by right clicking on it in Finder and pressing "Open" in the menu, it skips all the checks and launches the app without asking any questions.
masOS is just so visually stunning, from the fonts to the theme to the wallpaper to the blur effects ... it's very easy on the eyes.
Some people like things that look good, and others like things that work well.
This. I've used Gnome, but it just isn't the same. It lacks the polish. I don't know what, exactly, is wrong, but it just doesn't work for me. Mac's UI and animations are candy for the eyes.
@@verified_tinker1818 it's so good, of course kind of unfair to compare the two, but it's so obvious that 10s of 1000s of manhours have gone into the design of macos
Good thing I'm not the only one who thinks dragging dmg to app folder to install a program is stupid.
The first time I had to help a customer to set up a VPN and our software to do home office I was just so confused...
Enabling Teamviewer is so bad I had to google it
Installing an app was just not inuitive (contrary to the apple propaganda)
Transfering files to an iPhone is just oof.
iPhone example to install and use OpenVPN:
1. Install OpenVPN
2. Send vpn file over e-mail (because customers are stupid and they manage at least that)
3. Let them find their e-mail app and then find the email
4. open the attachement
5. "Share" the attachement with OpenVPN
6. Install OpenVPN profile
Android is just (Although these steps weren't tried on apple):
1. Install OpenVPN
2. Connect phone to PC
3. Transfer file to download folder
4. Open OpenVPN
5. Search file and import it
Dmg files sometimes include read mes and other files , so your solution may not be always applicabel. but theres also a .pkg installation method which is like what you described somehow, and some apps use it
What distro and or desktop environment is used at 6:40?
That's gnome