285K is not worth buying for gaming and Intel locking out the average overclocker really hurts these chips. Awesome review and I'm glad I found your channel. Thank you UA-cam algo for recommending!!
Great CPU for someone who knows about tuning. Intel and AMD are pretty much tied right now....Just got my 9950X and with a very mild tune(PBO,DDR5 6400 CL30....GB6- 3555/24791 After tuning properly should hit 3600/26000 easy.
I genuinely thought your review was incredible. Intel did not create this processor to beat other "gaming" processors, Intel created it to beat professional issues such as video editors, artists, 3D renderers, among others, adding to this the energy efficiency factor that could be infinitely better based on what they presented. It's far from being a bad processor, but it's not good either, it has its pros and cons. I always preferred the Intel platform because from my own experience, every Intel build I created worked smoothly, without stutters, but when I did 4 AMD builds, at least 2 were months of dealing with stutter until the bios was updated... Today I have a 5600x and a 3060ti, waiting for the next generation of the 9950x3d and the next ace up Intel's sleeve, which I believe will once again go head to head in several aspects of AMD.
I've got both a 265K and 285K. 100% get the 265K. The chip has better latency than the 285K by about 5ns. I got mine down to 63ns and I can't get below 67-68ns on my 285K. This has to do with the core arrangement. In games, I can't tell a difference. The 265K is a banger at productivity as well, getting well over 39K in CB23 when optimized and OC.
@@TalonsTech Crazy how a lot of these reviewers are sucking off the new X3D chips so hard right now when they still blow ass in Productivity task. Literally almost every review of the 9800X3D I've seen so far just mention gaming and the few honest reviewers show the Ultra beating the 9800X3D in Single and Multithread apps. Its like people forgot you can do other things with a PC besides game. 265k Is more then enough for me gaming at 4K.
So we tune 'this and that' so it sucks less. Fine but that still doesn't make it a great processor. Compared to AMD it's in fact miles off from being great...
Are you sharing your general sentiments on the CPU or responding to what was said? Because if it's a response, understand that at no point did I say this is a great CPU in general. I presented a nuanced perspective based on the mumbers recorded. It is good in particular applications, and not up to scratch in gaming. Intel has made strides in power efficiency and productivity applications but has gone backwards in raw gaming performance. This can't be that tough to understand.
Comparisons with 9600X only? Just remove AMD from the lot if you want to compare Intel CPUs but if you do - it is all bull.. no 9700X, 9950X, 7800X3D etc???
@@TheOverclockerMagazine The purpose of your video is to make a wise decision to choose a cpu and you dismally failed on that aspect unless what you are doing is post anything that piqued your interest, YT watchers be damned.
285K is not worth buying for gaming and Intel locking out the average overclocker really hurts these chips. Awesome review and I'm glad I found your channel. Thank you UA-cam algo for recommending!!
Do all you do is game on PC?
@@thetheoryguy5544 For a workstation chip it is good for productivity but if you game and work on it. There are better options at a cheaper price.
Best 285K review on the internet hands down
🔥 Now that's a truly awesome thing to say/write. Thank you sincerely. Glad it was meaningful to you in some way 🍻
Great CPU for someone who knows about tuning. Intel and AMD are pretty much tied right now....Just got my 9950X and with a very mild tune(PBO,DDR5 6400 CL30....GB6- 3555/24791 After tuning properly should hit 3600/26000 easy.
I genuinely thought your review was incredible. Intel did not create this processor to beat other "gaming" processors, Intel created it to beat professional issues such as video editors, artists, 3D renderers, among others, adding to this the energy efficiency factor that could be infinitely better based on what they presented. It's far from being a bad processor, but it's not good either, it has its pros and cons. I always preferred the Intel platform because from my own experience, every Intel build I created worked smoothly, without stutters, but when I did 4 AMD builds, at least 2 were months of dealing with stutter until the bios was updated... Today I have a 5600x and a 3060ti, waiting for the next generation of the 9950x3d and the next ace up Intel's sleeve, which I believe will once again go head to head in several aspects of AMD.
Im just here for control
Would have been great to compare this is a curve optimized Ryzen 9000 CPU. If you optimize a CPU, it needs to be compared to other optimized CPUs.
Shouldnt you be comparing it to the 14900k or is there a reason for using 14700k
The 14700K is the CPU I had on hand.
Giving AMD a run for their money. I'm going to buy one right now.
For productivity apps the CPU is very capable, despite only 24 cores. Power efficiency also seems much improved.
I really want the 265k...I only game in 4k.
Everyone should! You can run it in a van or tent with solar/battery power. Saves the planet. If you care you won't buy the 9800x3d.
Effect of CPU at 4K is diminished in favor of the GPU so there shouldn't be much difference between 265K, 285K or most other high end CPUs
I've got both a 265K and 285K. 100% get the 265K. The chip has better latency than the 285K by about 5ns. I got mine down to 63ns and I can't get below 67-68ns on my 285K. This has to do with the core arrangement. In games, I can't tell a difference. The 265K is a banger at productivity as well, getting well over 39K in CB23 when optimized and OC.
@@TalonsTech amazing to see people finally tuning their arrow lake cpus properly.. everybody else runs it on stock settings and crap on these cpus.
@@TalonsTech Crazy how a lot of these reviewers are sucking off the new X3D chips so hard right now when they still blow ass in Productivity task. Literally almost every review of the 9800X3D I've seen so far just mention gaming and the few honest reviewers show the Ultra beating the 9800X3D in Single and Multithread apps. Its like people forgot you can do other things with a PC besides game. 265k Is more then enough for me gaming at 4K.
So we tune 'this and that' so it sucks less. Fine but that still doesn't make it a great processor.
Compared to AMD it's in fact miles off from being great...
Are you sharing your general sentiments on the CPU or responding to what was said? Because if it's a response, understand that at no point did I say this is a great CPU in general. I presented a nuanced perspective based on the mumbers recorded. It is good in particular applications, and not up to scratch in gaming. Intel has made strides in power efficiency and productivity applications but has gone backwards in raw gaming performance.
This can't be that tough to understand.
Comparisons with 9600X only? Just remove AMD from the lot if you want to compare Intel CPUs but if you do - it is all bull.. no 9700X, 9950X, 7800X3D etc???
Calm down mate.. If you don't like it move on. Go and start the channel where you will do all that great analysis. All the best 😇
@@TheOverclockerMagazine The purpose of your video is to make a wise decision to choose a cpu and you dismally failed on that aspect unless what you are doing is post anything that piqued your interest, YT watchers be damned.
Why do Intel bothered released this garbage anyway? I thought rocket lake’s launch was bad enough already
You do know you don't have to buy this right? Intel didn't release this to hurt your feelings.