Відео

Yes it is

Calm down mate.. If you don't like it move on. Go and start the channel where you will do all that great analysis. All the best 😇

@@TheOverclockerMagazine The purpose of your video is to make a wise decision to choose a cpu and you dismally failed on that aspect unless what you are doing is post anything that piqued your interest, YT watchers be damned.

You do know you don't have to buy this right? Intel didn't release this to hurt your feelings.

Yes, your GPU PCIe link speed will be reduced to X8 lanes. Three of the total four are wired to the CPU and if you populate any two of these, GPU link speed is reduced

The 14700K is the CPU I had on hand.

For productivity apps the CPU is very capable, despite only 24 cores. Power efficiency also seems much improved.

2*24 is on the QVL for 8200 and a number of 2*16 kits at 8000. The A die I used isn't meant for 8000, but could post it as you saw. If I wanted to run 8000, I'd bet on 2*24 over 2*16

@ QVL doesn’t really mean much, a lot of manufactures gives misleading numbers So many z790 boards for example claimed 8000mhz but those were complete lies Did you get around to testing if 8000 could pass something like yrcuncher vt3 or karhu

@@Frosty-dr8bs 8000 on AMD has been stable for a while, espeically since AGESA 1.2.0.2. Simple DDR5 8000 operation was one of the key updates for the AGESA. All the Mdie I tried on the board worked fine at 8000 XMP and 8200 for another Titanium kit I have. As for VST, I did not do hours of this as there was no reason to doubt it could since lesser boards from 600 series were already capable of this (B650E Aorus Elite X ICE for example). You can also check the QVL DRAM vendor side as well. For instance GSkill certified their DDR5 8000 on the X870E Aorus Master for both 2*16 Adie and 2*24Mdie. Memory OC on WiFi7 & Master is identical

@ that is good to know thank you

Everyone should! You can run it in a van or tent with solar/battery power. Saves the planet. If you care you won't buy the 9800x3d.

Effect of CPU at 4K is diminished in favor of the GPU so there shouldn't be much difference between 265K, 285K or most other high end CPUs

I've got both a 265K and 285K. 100% get the 265K. The chip has better latency than the 285K by about 5ns. I got mine down to 63ns and I can't get below 67-68ns on my 285K. This has to do with the core arrangement. In games, I can't tell a difference. The 265K is a banger at productivity as well, getting well over 39K in CB23 when optimized and OC.

​@@TalonsTech amazing to see people finally tuning their arrow lake cpus properly.. everybody else runs it on stock settings and crap on these cpus.

@@TalonsTech Crazy how a lot of these reviewers are sucking off the new X3D chips so hard right now when they still blow ass in Productivity task. Literally almost every review of the 9800X3D I've seen so far just mention gaming and the few honest reviewers show the Ultra beating the 9800X3D in Single and Multithread apps. Its like people forgot you can do other things with a PC besides game. 265k Is more then enough for me gaming at 4K.

Do all you do is game on PC?

@@thetheoryguy5544 For a workstation chip it is good for productivity but if you game and work on it. There are better options at a cheaper price.

Unfortunately or fortunately (depending on how you feel about RGB lighting), it does not have lighting there.

Yes indeed initial bootup times can be long, but afterwards it's normal. Memory context restore does for sure reduce boot up times, but I can't speak to how it affects long term stability. Best bet I suppose is to enable it, but set a fail proof dram frequency, 5200 or lower. Should not he any dram instability at such a low frequency

Do you need the additional 16GB of Memory? If not rather save your money and get the Corsair kit. That being said, the Kingston kit is exceptional and it runs 8600 C38 @1.45V (default) on Z890 without much effort. So I'd say get the Kingston if you plan on pushing your system well beyond DDR5 8000 but if not the 7200 C34 is great

Are you sharing your general sentiments on the CPU or responding to what was said? Because if it's a response, understand that at no point did I say this is a great CPU in general. I presented a nuanced perspective based on the mumbers recorded. It is good in particular applications, and not up to scratch in gaming. Intel has made strides in power efficiency and productivity applications but has gone backwards in raw gaming performance. This can't be that tough to understand.

🔥 Now that's a truly awesome thing to say/write. Thank you sincerely. Glad it was meaningful to you in some way 🍻

Really happy with this board tbh, and haven't used the Tomahawk so can't say.

Tomahawk does oc better by 1.7% according to monitor unboxed, but both are similar.

@@hyprjay X870 vs X870E chipset. They are priced the same in my country. My MSI B550 Tomahawk is working flawlessly since 2020. So, I'm kind of leaning towards the Tomahawk, but the latter has a better chipset. Hard decision

That's great. Should be one of the fastest gaming setups you can own as it is

It's fortunate then your feelings are your own and aren't relevant to anyone but you. 🍻 Feel free to move on and all the best.

Well the 8000 kit can easily do 6400 CL30 so there's some flexibility there. But in all honesty just go with the Titanium 6400 kit

@@TheOverclockerMagazine Thanks! Buildzoid is saying there is some latency advantage (which helps with gaming) to running 2:1 mode with UCLK and FCLK synchronised, especially at 2000 MHz, it's just that you need a good motherboard for the 8000 to work. So yeah whichever kit I get I'll at least try 8000. I'm doing flight simulators so the CPU and memory performance is maybe a bit more critical than most games. It'll be fun to test, as long as I spend more time flying than tweaking settings.

Nah there's no back plate here outside of the small addional plate for the primary PCIe slot

For the price, this is really awesome and should be even lower today

@@TheOverclockerMagazine the price has gone down by a bit! At my local store, there is this exact XFX card for $550

@@TheOverclockerMagazine the price has gone down by a lot! At my local store, there is this exact card for $550!

B650E can run the GPU at x16 with additional x4 for NMVe. But B650 will drop the GPU to x8. That being said, you can just not use the M.2 socket wired to the CPU on B650 and use the others from the PCH at Gen4 x4 and retain the full x16 lanes for your GPU

We shall have to see how it all plays out. 2024 not the greatest years for CPUs.

The 3rd one is for dimm.2

@@daddyskywalker_1350 Thanks

Not with a dedicated GPU, unfortunately you cannot.

Yeah at every launch of a platform Asus goes all out to prove the capabilites of their boards and they knock it out the park all the time.

Definitely suitable for a badass gaming rig as well. At this point Apex is a very completw board suitable for extreme Overclocking and for gaming setup just as much

Much appreciated 🪄

Come to rAge I'll be there and so will this board

@@TheOverclockerMagazine Can't wait, it shall be overdue catchup indeed 😁

@@TheOverclockerMagazine this is great news! 🤩

Agreed! Seeing someone like Neo doing overclocking in person would be so amazing! I'll come to rAge just for that alone

@@frikkiefrikkels7971 Heck yeah 😉🔥

I've not had crashes per say but have had some odd behavior, RGB effects not setting in sync with other components etc. Generally not the greatest software, so unsurprised by your challenges. That being said, do ping tech support, cause the more of us report the issues officially the more likely and the sooner the software will be fixed/updated.

@@TheOverclockerMagazine thank you

Most definitely. Pretty much sets the standard for now across many disciplines. Really like the two cable solution and the epic performance

@@TheOverclockerMagazine I found mine on ebay for $30. That's cheaper than a Five Guys meal for three people. hahaha

No it will not share lanes. You'll get a full x16 and full x4

@@TheOverclockerMagazine one more question. Can I use my Pci-E 3.0 M.2 NVMe SSD on this board. I'm not really sure, that this board only supports 4.0 and 5.0.

@@TheOverclockerMagazine thanks for ur help

Oh no that doesn't sound good. At the very least 7800 should be possible. In fact you should not need 1.45V for 7200. Are you on the latest BIOS?

Yes using the latest bios. Actually I tried to run TM5 and it was not stable :( Going to try tweak some cpu voltages maybe? Since I’m UVing the ring voltage, and cpu core voltage but I don’t think those change something. What do you think?