The Crown | Season 1 | Abdication Scene

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 лют 2022
  • The abdication of King Edward VIII. From the Crown Season 1, Episode 3 'Windsor'.
    All copyright goes to Netflix.
    #queen #queenelizabeth #queenelizabethii
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 397

  • @nrafter530
    @nrafter530 Рік тому +748

    The look King George gives to his daughter at the end, as if to say "I'm so sorry for this. I'm so sorry for what we're going to put you through" and young Elizabeth's reaction; fear, anxiety and trepidation.

    • @davido9080
      @davido9080 8 місяців тому +21

      …even though she would have been Queen anyway.

    • @usagi18
      @usagi18 8 місяців тому +3

      ​@@davido9080If there was any monarchy left to begin with.

    • @davido9080
      @davido9080 8 місяців тому +2

      @@usagi18 touché.

    • @usagi18
      @usagi18 8 місяців тому +8

      @@davido9080 it's ironical that a social climber saved the monarchy, isn't it?

    • @RoPiDe
      @RoPiDe 8 місяців тому +12

      🙄🙄🙄 right... "Im sorry that you'll have infinite privilege and very, very few responsibilities, and a huge fortune at you disposal"... sounds like a nightmare...

  • @two-handpianist4517
    @two-handpianist4517 Рік тому +1098

    Not many people pointed this out, but i always found it interesting that the casting directors always got the actresses playing Mary of Teck so accurate. Even in this series or in the king's speech

    • @franciscoguerrero4564
      @franciscoguerrero4564 Рік тому +70

      And too bad that Eileen Atkins never got a recognition for this performance. Neither the Screen Actors Guild recognize that when the series got a SAG nomination for best ensemble and she was not included 🤦‍♂️

    • @lauraclaire
      @lauraclaire Рік тому +14

      I agree she nailed it.

    • @gracechapman559
      @gracechapman559 Рік тому +13

      The casting for the first four seasons are amazing.

    • @imonlyndon
      @imonlyndon Рік тому +16

      eileen atkins also plays queen mary in a miniseries called “bertie and elizabeth”

    • @chrism2535
      @chrism2535 Рік тому +4

      To be fair, not the first time that she has played the role.

  • @jcs1025
    @jcs1025 Рік тому +999

    Watching this scene now after the death of the Queen at 96 years old lends so much more weight to the glances that Elizabeth and her father exchange. She was never meant to be Queen before her uncle abdicated, and she and her father never wanted the job. However, they both gave their lives to it, with the Queen being the longest reigning monarch in English history, and the 2nd longest reigning in world history.

    • @crambo000
      @crambo000 Рік тому +101

      Actually, Edward the 8th never had any children so Elizabeth would’ve became Queen anyway, albeit much later in life

    • @jcs1025
      @jcs1025 Рік тому +24

      @@crambo000 I said was never meant to be Queen before her uncle abdicated. But we don’t know how history would have played out had he not.

    • @crambo000
      @crambo000 Рік тому +8

      @@jcs1025 well you were inaccurate so I corrected your statement, you’re welcome

    • @commodorezero
      @commodorezero Рік тому +25

      @@jcs1025 Given that Edward VIII was expected to have Wallis as his long term mistress and not get married it was expected that Elizabeth would become Queen at some point. Given she was a women born to a second son she could have been surpassed in the line of succession but that was not expected to happen at this stage. If Edward didn't abdicate Elizabeth becomes Queen in 1972 and rules for 50 years dying after her Golden Jubillee not "Platinum" jubilee(which should have been 75 not 70 years but the govt wanted an excuse to have a party and they knew Elizabeth wouldn't make it to 2027).

    • @m.s.6586
      @m.s.6586 Рік тому +4

      @@commodorezero
      What he was expected and what could have happened are two different things. He would not have been the first man in his later years to father a child. Of course there are rumors he was unable to- but rumors are exactly that, rumors.

  • @MsRedfield97
    @MsRedfield97 Рік тому +179

    You can see how stressed George VI was towards the end of the speech. It's as if it finally sank into him that "Oh fuck...I'm the King now..." and he's not sure if he's up for the job.

    • @theofficialphoenixtv5765
      @theofficialphoenixtv5765 8 місяців тому +3

      He is Tsar Nicholas II as he should've been.

    • @RMSTitanicWSL
      @RMSTitanicWSL 5 місяців тому +4

      Fortunately, for the British Empire and the rest of the world, he was.......

    • @adrielsebastian5216
      @adrielsebastian5216 5 місяців тому +6

      He sure was up to the job (he guided the country through the war after all) but that job literally killed him. He never expected to be king, or at the very least not that quickly. The stress of the job caused him to start smoking, develop lung cancer and died at just 56. The Queen also didn't expect to be Queen at such a young age but mercifully was granted good health for most of her life.

    • @mistybethune9116
      @mistybethune9116 5 місяців тому

      He wasn't becoming king id what killed George vi

  • @GoofyHD3
    @GoofyHD3 Рік тому +77

    The moment when Elizabeth's fate changed forever

    • @RudesMom
      @RudesMom 6 місяців тому +2

      Possibly not. Her father was the heir apparent as David/Edward did not have children at the point so she was second in line. Even if he didn't abdicate, there was no guarantee that he would have married someone more acceptable than Wallis and had legitimate children of his own.

    • @ladyv5655
      @ladyv5655 2 місяці тому

      A story I heard was that David had mumps as a teenager which left him infertile. If that's true, then Elizabeth would have become queen eventually, probably when her uncle died in 1972. This is assuming that her own father still died of lung cancer in 1952. Instead of becoming queen as a young woman of 25, she would have become queen as a middle aged woman of 45.

    • @MightyJosh1985
      @MightyJosh1985 Місяць тому

      No, she would have been Queen anyway

    • @MightyJosh1985
      @MightyJosh1985 Місяць тому

      @@RudesMom Heir presumptive not apparent. As there was a chance that Edward could have a child who would then remove him as heir. That way when her father was King. Then Princess Elizabeth was heir presumptive, not apparent like Charles was or William is now. As they are first-born children. Sons before the Perth Agreement in 2011 changed it to first-born child regardless of sex.

    • @golden-63
      @golden-63 7 днів тому +1

      Not really. She would have become Queen anyway. His abdication only caused that to happen sooner.

  • @wolf2912
    @wolf2912 5 місяців тому +52

    King George wanted a peaceful life with his family but he became one of great britain greatest king during ww2
    And now father and daughther are reunited 😢

  • @flowerfaerie8931
    @flowerfaerie8931 2 місяці тому +15

    Someone needs to give the little girl playing baby Elizabeth a damn medal for this scene. That *look* she gives George VI at the end is absolutely chilling.

  • @spacejamsham2440
    @spacejamsham2440 Рік тому +151

    Probably best he did abdicate, given his somewhat fondness of the guy with the mustache

  • @JackCallSports
    @JackCallSports Рік тому +157

    Watching this side by side with the original
    He sounds just like him it’s insane
    Well done to the actor

  • @kevinlongman007
    @kevinlongman007 Рік тому +72

    He was not introduced as the Duke of Windsor as he did not yet have that title. He was introduced as His Royal Highness Prince Edward.

  • @dnorfed
    @dnorfed Рік тому +130

    What a masterpiece of history and how this story is told. Edwards abdication gave us eventually a great queen, how lucky we were

    • @jw9565
      @jw9565 8 місяців тому +8

      It also gave the UK a great king in George VI.

    • @TheFauve4ever
      @TheFauve4ever 6 місяців тому +6

      If he didn’t abdicate she would have been Queen in 1972. Wallis Simpson wasn’t able to have children.

    • @susansurles3776
      @susansurles3776 5 місяців тому +2

      Assuming the monarchy survived the war. Her father was a much much better king than her uncle.

    • @LukeSky2207
      @LukeSky2207 23 дні тому

      ​@@susansurles3776 I mean, it's not like they'd abolish it, winning the war and all...

  • @galogarces9182
    @galogarces9182 Рік тому +263

    Mary of Teck was so regal and dignified.

    • @lidiareyes7048
      @lidiareyes7048 Рік тому +35

      And so complex, she was centered in her duties and those of her family but she still loved them, and she lost so many of them before she died

  • @rheailiarome2287
    @rheailiarome2287 Рік тому +68

    Looking back abdicating was the only good thing he did. His brother was a better man and a great and hard working King who stood with his people to fight one of the most cruel regimes that ever existed on this earth and his daughter was as dutiful as he and one of the best monarchs that England ever had. God save the King 🙏

  • @dillonchavez5390
    @dillonchavez5390 Рік тому +400

    "My first words must be to declare my allegiance to him. This I do with all my heart." Says the guy who is suspected to fraternize with Nazi Germany and possibly be part of a plan to remove his brother from the throne should the UK fall. Aside from the abdication, his association with the nazis was shameful to say the least.

    • @Orcawhale1
      @Orcawhale1 Рік тому +15

      Invented drama, along with the coup scene.

    • @wickedwitchoftheeast88
      @wickedwitchoftheeast88 Рік тому

      @@Orcawhale1 actually it isn't invented. The Crown got that much right, tje Marburg files are real Edward VIII sold Britain out to the Nazis and you can't argue he was niave and had no idea because there were tensions between Germany and Europe when George V was on the throne. He was a traitor thats why he was exiled and not allowed in the UK unless the Sovereign gave permission for him to come back

    • @BiG-JuPO1O1
      @BiG-JuPO1O1 Рік тому +1

      Queen Mother and King George were also Nazi sympathizers so there no difference expect George and Queen Mother had to play it t safe and pretend to be for the people when their hearts didn't align what they preached.

    • @wickedwitchoftheeast88
      @wickedwitchoftheeast88 Рік тому

      @GamerKat'71 He also gave full Nazi salutes as well, what a shame he wasn't tried for treason he was lucky he lived in relative comfort in exile and he still bitched about that! He deserved far worse than he got

    • @KaiserFranzJosefI
      @KaiserFranzJosefI Рік тому +16

      @GamerKat'71 The implication that he plotted with the Nazis to depose his brother however is absolutely nonsense which neither side ever entertained

  • @anthonymason4999
    @anthonymason4999 Рік тому +56

    She took that deep breath as i did. Felt that

  • @eddihaskell
    @eddihaskell 8 місяців тому +34

    In actuality, the Wallis Simpson was not there during this final meeting. She was already in France. Queen Mary vowed never to "receive" her after the abdication.

  • @c.w.simpsonproductions1230
    @c.w.simpsonproductions1230 Рік тому +153

    The fallout from the abdication continues to echo to this day. George and Elizabeth likely would have inherited the throne eventually since it’s likely he was sterile, but since Elizabeth was forced to become Queen so early she was unable to properly parent her children. All the damage affected how each generation would raise the next.

    • @usagi18
      @usagi18 8 місяців тому

      Yup. Charles would have grown as a secure man, and married the woman he loved without a hassle. No clueless teenage girls would have been added in the equation.
      William and Harry would have been ugly as hell with that DNA. But no biggie.

    • @crazyman8472
      @crazyman8472 6 місяців тому +5

      At least Prince (now King) Charles had plenty of time to parent…right? 🤔

    • @calistafalcontail
      @calistafalcontail 6 місяців тому +3

      I dont think she was sterile but Wallis and him were not that young anymore when he became King.

    • @martinquessandier3282
      @martinquessandier3282 5 місяців тому +6

      He/She was not sterile! He and she were friends with Hitler... The echo of a non-abdication would have been worse...

    • @IMNOTAMUSED1
      @IMNOTAMUSED1 5 місяців тому +2

      On your last point, I feel it's more important to say that we would have had an outstanding Queen for a less amount of time and that would have been very bad.

  • @DGoldy303
    @DGoldy303 Рік тому +84

    2:54 She's like "Oh shit..."

    • @DaveFisher-cq2dr
      @DaveFisher-cq2dr Рік тому +1

      members of the royal family do not think with that word, especially young kids

    • @ladyv5655
      @ladyv5655 2 місяці тому

      ​@@DaveFisher-cq2dr, I bet they do. They just don't say it.

    • @MightyJosh1985
      @MightyJosh1985 Місяць тому

      Either way she would have been Queen. Just later in 1972 not 1952.

    • @DaveFisher-cq2dr
      @DaveFisher-cq2dr Місяць тому

      @@ladyv5655 maybe, but not kids, they probably just think "oh crap"

  • @HookedOnSonics518
    @HookedOnSonics518 Рік тому +565

    I'm not a citizen of the Commonwealth, but they were much better off with George VI. I shudder to think what would have happened if Britain carried on with a king who was chums with Hitler and hated non-whites.

    • @NorthernTemplar
      @NorthernTemplar Рік тому +23

      I dream of what could have been.
      Perhaps we wouldn't be in the mess we are today.

    • @netoobioha6317
      @netoobioha6317 Рік тому +147

      @@NorthernTemplar bro.

    • @terranrepublic7023
      @terranrepublic7023 Рік тому +22

      The throne would have passed onto his brother Bertie's bloodline anyway, since he never had any kids and after he dies in 1972 the next in line would be Elizabeth 2 (assuming Bertie is also dead in this alternate universe, where Edward 8 carried on but Bertie still died the same year he did in ours, in 1952), then Charles 3 etc, the world would be much the same only a few decades with a different king

    • @evansquilt
      @evansquilt Рік тому

      @@terranrepublic7023 - if he'd married someone other than Wallis Simpson, he very well might have had children. She seems to have been sterile.
      Either way, he would have been a terrible king.

    • @anneneville6255
      @anneneville6255 Рік тому +16

      @@terranrepublic7023 if he was to stay king, I doubt he could have married Wallis. Maybe with other women, he could have had children. Who knows

  • @lcute810
    @lcute810 Рік тому +30

    when you compare this scene with the original one it is so accurate like the actor’s voice is literally the same

  • @mochtegerndane7097
    @mochtegerndane7097 3 місяці тому +9

    I am not religious, but the Brits were either totally lucky - or had major help from above - when Edward left. Considering, what came after, George VI was so much better.

  • @wardarcade7452
    @wardarcade7452 4 місяці тому +5

    Actually, Sir John Reith, the BBC Director General had termed the former king as ' His Royal Highness, PRINCE Edward' when introducing him to the radio audience before he made his Abdication statement. He'd technically already abdicated hours earlier so the announcer couldn't call him 'His Majesty, the King'. It wouldn't be until the next day that he'd get informally termed as 'the Duke of Windsor' though this wouldn't be made official for some months afterwards.
    Oh, and Queen Mary only appealed to him via writing him instead of meeting him in person [and continued to refuse to meet Wallis]!

  • @carriew5106
    @carriew5106 Рік тому +275

    The past days in the UK, during the period of national mourning, have taught me not just about the Queen's sacrifice and duty, but also the enormous impact on her family. A family clearly mourning the death of their beloved mother and grandmother all whilst under the watchful eye of the press, having to get on with succession rather than being allowed to grieve like the public could do. You could see the burden clearly on King Charles and Prince William's faces especially as they watched what their futures would be.
    Watching this clip you can see how much that burden weighs on King George looking at Elizabeth and knowing how her life will forever be changed.

    • @thelittlemoonling
      @thelittlemoonling Рік тому +1

      Burden? I am pretty positive he pulled the plug on her bc he was tided of waiting to be king haha

  • @justinp5661
    @justinp5661 Рік тому +65

    George VI was the man they needed

    • @Reichsritter
      @Reichsritter Рік тому

      No

    • @theofficialphoenixtv5765
      @theofficialphoenixtv5765 Рік тому +11

      @@Reichsritter whatchu mean no? George VI was the King Britain needed during that period of time.

    • @Reichsritter
      @Reichsritter Рік тому +2

      @@theofficialphoenixtv5765 He was a do nothing mascot

    • @TheMrTobiasRieper
      @TheMrTobiasRieper Рік тому +11

      @@Reichsritter Do nothing? He helped lead the UK through the Second World War. He helped stabilize the monarchy. The UK decolonized a ton under him. He’s easily amongst the greatest monarchs ever.

    • @Reichsritter
      @Reichsritter Рік тому +1

      @@TheMrTobiasRieper He lost an Empire, what an achievement

  • @scottgrunow5201
    @scottgrunow5201 Рік тому +7

    Queen Mary never saw Wallis in person after a public presentation at a palace event David took Wallis to

  • @andrewbrendan1579
    @andrewbrendan1579 Рік тому +26

    The young actress who plays Princess Elizabeth as a child bears such a s resemblance to Claire Foy who played Elizabeth as an adult that I wonder if the two actresses are related.
    It makes for a more dramatic scene but I believe that when the former King Edward/Duke of Windsor gave his abdication message Wallis Simpson was not present. Maybe someone else can add a comment but my recollection is that Wallis was with friends at her or their home listening to the radio. I find it hard to believe Queen Mary would allow herself to be in the same room as her son's mistress. Quite a while before this, Wallis was presented at Court before the King and Queen and I think Wallis was later at a gathering at Buckingham Palace with the Queen present but before the situation had escalated to the point of abdication.

  • @lonl123
    @lonl123 Рік тому +348

    The fortune of the UK, that George VI was a real man, while overcoming doubts, insecurities and a great reluctance manned up and did his duty. He became a great King that was loved not only by his wife and children, but by the nation he served. He was in a word, a hero....while his brother was a self centered egocentric prick (And probable traitor) who in a strange twist of fate, sacrificed everything for a wicked harpy who never loved him.

    • @sarahtobore2832
      @sarahtobore2832 Рік тому +36

      She never loved him and yet she stayed with him until his death? Yeah, what a witch 🤡

    • @evansquilt
      @evansquilt Рік тому +40

      @@sarahtobore2832 - it's called "money."

    • @sarahtobore2832
      @sarahtobore2832 Рік тому +7

      @@evansquilt how much money could it have been ? Lol 🤣

    • @jebthegodemperor7301
      @jebthegodemperor7301 Рік тому +21

      @@sarahtobore2832 a lot.

    • @HorWangZaaa
      @HorWangZaaa Рік тому +20

      @@sarahtobore2832 enough that she could held a party in personal palace every day.

  • @IndependentConversations
    @IndependentConversations Рік тому +12

    History buffs Wallis and Edward had to be in separate countries at this time because if she was there, it was a legal liability that Edward would be guilty of collusion. Actually, he was more than guilty of.

  • @1mrsohara
    @1mrsohara Рік тому +26

    Three Kings in one year...

    • @davidw.2791
      @davidw.2791 Рік тому +15

      I actually bought an old book that was published in early 1936, a book mourning the passing of George V and recapping the life of the Prince of Wales now Edward VIII, and how it predicts a long and good reign of his majesty.
      Boy, talk about a time capsule.

    • @Shalashaskaa
      @Shalashaskaa Рік тому

      @@davidw.2791 What is the title of the book?

    • @davidw.2791
      @davidw.2791 Рік тому +3

      @@Shalashaskaa “Long Live The King - George V - King and Emperor; Prince and Sovereign Edward VIII” published by Winston, Toronto house.

    • @johnpickford4222
      @johnpickford4222 Рік тому +1

      “We three Kings from England Are.” Bearing no gifts we’re local so we didn’t travel far.”

    • @johnpickford4222
      @johnpickford4222 Рік тому

      @@Shalashaskaa Are you really going to read it?

  • @arfenmalik1717
    @arfenmalik1717 Рік тому +136

    Abdicating must have haunted him especially as he grew older😬😬
    Once it's gone it's gone
    He talks about being happy but come on

    • @CommonSenz
      @CommonSenz Рік тому

      well later he wanted to get back on the throne by the help of the Nazis.. that agreement ofcourse would've meant the execution of George VI and his family.

    • @Reichsritter
      @Reichsritter Рік тому +4

      I would have never abdicated

    • @nomahope3182
      @nomahope3182 Рік тому +4

      He chose love. I am sure he was happy.

    • @arfenmalik1717
      @arfenmalik1717 Рік тому

      @@nomahope3182 people love wat you can give them
      Get the difference

    • @cherylannemason
      @cherylannemason Рік тому

      @@nomahope3182 I've never been sure if it was ever about happiness--he had to have known that saying he made a mistake would've gotten him nowhere.

  • @stellac.e2086
    @stellac.e2086 Рік тому +105

    as FIRST BORN SON, he was supposed to marry first, have an heir. but was a single 'play boy', dating around & living the carefree life. then meets twice divorced wallis.

    • @evansquilt
      @evansquilt Рік тому +23

      He had a string of mistresses, every one of them married, several of them American. No one would have cared if he'd married and fathered the traditional heir-and-spare, especially if he'd been discreet about it. It was the choice of someone he could not constitutionally marry, who had already had two marriages with no children and was almost certainly sterile, that sank him.

    • @stellac.e2086
      @stellac.e2086 Рік тому +2

      @@evansquilt that's what i wrote!! mine is the shorter version. it boils down to: 'he did not fulfill his duty to marry an English girl, have an heir'.

    • @ronoccc
      @ronoccc Рік тому

      he was a twat

    • @davidw.2791
      @davidw.2791 Рік тому +8

      Now, him not marrying per se (and Albert having to take the throne after David dies childless) was still not the end of the world; like Bertie said in “The King’s Speech”, David could give his new mistress Wallis a title and a big house and he could cavort with her at night all he wants so long as he shows up for work at day.
      But he wouldn’t even do that.

    • @ohhellyeah2878
      @ohhellyeah2878 Рік тому

      And Wallis was ugly af. He was king and she was the best he could do? Lmao what a joke.

  • @tommiegirl2441
    @tommiegirl2441 17 днів тому

    This was so well played. You can feel the trepidation in George V1, and you can see the weight fall on young Elizabeth's shoulders. The look they exchange is just incredible. They both change forever in that moment when the abdicated Edward says, "God save the King." And only the two of them can really understand the burden. Fantastic!

  • @Shockage
    @Shockage Рік тому +13

    I certainly enjoyed listening to Edward's letters to his beloved.

    • @SymphonyBrahms
      @SymphonyBrahms 4 місяці тому +1

      She treated him very badly. Cheated on him and belittled him.

  • @Goldstone93
    @Goldstone93 Рік тому +4

    “No one wants to hear from a private individual.”

  • @shutup257
    @shutup257 Рік тому +13

    It was all nothing but the destiny that brought the crown to Queen Elizabeth ll

    • @johnpickford4222
      @johnpickford4222 Рік тому

      Neha Patwey: You fool, “destiny” had nothing to do with it. Her father was next in line and he only had two daughters. When he died, his daughter became Queen.

    • @shutup257
      @shutup257 Рік тому

      @@johnpickford4222 Have you forgotten her uncle, elder than her father who was originally face to the crown and who left the crown for her beloved girlfriend and then there happened a very early death of her father who forced her to handle the monarch in such an early age this is what I was talking about in my comment

  • @brettlarch8050
    @brettlarch8050 Рік тому +30

    After the abdication, poor George Vi broke down and sobbed.

    • @DaveFisher-cq2dr
      @DaveFisher-cq2dr Рік тому +5

      and I'm sure young Elizabeth was worried about her new future, all the hard work and duties that lie ahead of her now

    • @kagomefan101
      @kagomefan101 Рік тому +8

      All George VI wanted was a quiet life with his family, but his selfish brother robbed him of all of that. While I’m so grateful he was King during that time, especially during WWII, I’m so resentful of Edward. He dumped all his responsibilities on his younger brother. Total selfish prick

    • @brettlarch8050
      @brettlarch8050 Рік тому +1

      @@kagomefan101
      Truly, the worst way to backstab someone.

  • @liamroberts2576
    @liamroberts2576 Рік тому +5

    The moment Elizabeth realizes…

  • @Vic35102
    @Vic35102 Рік тому +17

    The best thing David did was to applicate It led us to have 70 years of the most amazing monarch of our time

  • @sarwoedi85
    @sarwoedi85 Рік тому +15

    the King Edward VIII's cast Alex Jenning were also play a role as Prince Charles in The Queen

    • @johnpickford4222
      @johnpickford4222 Рік тому

      The SarWow: REALLY, YOU’RE KIDDING! NO WAY! I mean NO ONE EXCEPT YOU would know or care to waste their time posting an a**hole response like that as you did.

    • @tomspence8506
      @tomspence8506 11 місяців тому +2

      And Eileen Atkins had previously played Queen Mary of Teck in the TV drama Bertie and Elizabeth.

  • @mst3KGf
    @mst3KGf 11 місяців тому +14

    "I have found it impossible to carry the heavy burden of responsibility and to discharge the duties of my responsibilities as king..."
    Very ironic given that even when he was on the throne, he was a disinterested, lazy slacker who had to be pushed to do the minimum required of him.

  • @WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT1
    @WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT1 5 місяців тому +2

    I have vintage crockery made for the would-be coronation of Edward VIII in May 1937 - the coronation that was instead held for his brother

  • @jonboxleitner7354
    @jonboxleitner7354 Рік тому

    Massive scene.

  • @lizzychann5206
    @lizzychann5206 Рік тому +3

    rip queen Elizabeth🙏🙏🙏

  • @christinageorge6945
    @christinageorge6945 8 місяців тому +10

    I wonder if David had any regrets giving up the throne and having his brother handle 2 world wars. That is a HUGE burden to put on someone’s shoulders.

    • @AussieRider20
      @AussieRider20 2 місяці тому +1

      George VI was only king during WW2. It was his father George V who was king during WW1.

  • @bds2003
    @bds2003 2 роки тому +20

    He did with all his heart.

  • @jaycorbin
    @jaycorbin Рік тому +7

    “Now that I am no longer King, I have more time to play with my new friend Hitler.”

    • @Vic35102
      @Vic35102 Рік тому

      love it ❤

    • @jaycorbin
      @jaycorbin Рік тому +1

      @@Vic35102 The fact that Edward VIII was a Nazi Sympathizer wasn’t exactly kept hidden very well.

    • @golden-63
      @golden-63 7 днів тому

      Lots of prominent Brits were sympathetic towards Hitler and the Nazis at the beginning. Edward was hardly alone in that.

    • @jaycorbin
      @jaycorbin 7 днів тому

      @@golden-63 the fact he never stopped being sympathetic has always been a black stain on the Royal Family. He’s as bad as Joseph Kennedy Sr in the US.

  • @njs9864
    @njs9864 Рік тому

    Wow the resemblance in her features!

  • @christinageorge6945
    @christinageorge6945 Рік тому +19

    Imagine how different the crown would be if he kept the crown and George VI had raised his daughters to be somewhat normal.

    • @nerdydrawer7265
      @nerdydrawer7265 Рік тому +9

      Considering his views at the time, I would say it’s for the better he never became king.

    • @gidzmobug2323
      @gidzmobug2323 8 місяців тому +8

      Assuming that he had no children, Elizabeth would have become Queen 20 years later (in 1972 instead of 1952).

    • @calistafalcontail
      @calistafalcontail 6 місяців тому +2

      Elisabeth was way more normal than Edward...she did the best she could. Your comment sounds like she was totally unhinged. She was the most sane one from all of them considering the pressure she was under. We are all flawed and she was too but in those circumstances, she turned out fine.

  • @marig6184
    @marig6184 4 місяці тому +2

    Edward expected Hitler to place him back on the throne.

  • @racheldavin7763
    @racheldavin7763 Рік тому +5

    Huge inaccuracy-Wallis wasn't there...she was in France.

    • @gidzmobug2323
      @gidzmobug2323 8 місяців тому

      I don't think that was Wallis. Might have been a secretary.

    • @Retnoob
      @Retnoob 6 місяців тому

      Incredibly minor, actually.

  • @MrMrMuhummad
    @MrMrMuhummad Рік тому +1

    I discharged my last duty as King & Emperor !

  • @TheAdvancedMusic
    @TheAdvancedMusic Рік тому +10

    Always find the lighting of such scenes as this a source of curiosity; certain character's faces in times of affliction are lit in such a way that one side is shadowed. Is this just styling for atmosphere or is it a subtle attempt by the DP to further suggest inner conflict, also? There's a great example of this in the Godfather when Hagen is being interrogated by Sollozzo.

  • @DaveFisher-cq2dr
    @DaveFisher-cq2dr Місяць тому

    this abdication speech was also well read by Guy Pearce who played David in "The King's Speech"

  • @piusx8317
    @piusx8317 4 місяці тому +2

    When you realise you're going to spend the rest of your life as a ribbon cutter 😂

  • @helstonoldboy
    @helstonoldboy Місяць тому

    That look at the end between George VI and Elizabeth II is just something else. Imagine being that little girl and realising that you were almost certainly going to become Queen. Quite different to knowing from birth. Old enough to realise what it meant. And still, never expecting to become Queen so young.
    Yes, before that point she was already 2nd in line for the throne... but Edward VIII might have had a child. Now her only hope was that her 36 year old mother would get pregnant again - and have a son.

  • @gayan2517
    @gayan2517 Рік тому +23

    Commoner : Long live the king.
    Royal guy : Er...that's my brother, Go and speak to him.😁

    • @BiG-JuPO1O1
      @BiG-JuPO1O1 Рік тому +1

      Not all commoners support monarchy

  • @francialazcano3139
    @francialazcano3139 Рік тому +1

    George face like :oh Edward what do you do???

  • @DaveFisher-cq2dr
    @DaveFisher-cq2dr Місяць тому

    2:29 and therefore that day, both Bertie and Elizabeth's destinies are changed forever, a heavy duty they both never wanted, Elizabeth knows now that in the near future she'll become queen when her father will be gone

  • @sebastiangrumman8507
    @sebastiangrumman8507 6 місяців тому +2

    The Anglican Church was founded by Henry VIII on the basis of securing a divorce, multiple divorces as it turns out. I wonder if Edward ever pointed that out? He could have added, "What's in another one, more or less? I'm just joining the queue." Defender of the Faith. What utter BS.

    • @Sifirela
      @Sifirela 5 місяців тому

      It's good that he did abdicate though, I don't think England would have survived WWII. He and Wallis Simpson had ties and were seen as sympathizers for Nazi beliefs.

  • @DaveFisher-cq2dr
    @DaveFisher-cq2dr Місяць тому

    and ever since that day, David a.k.a. King Edward VIII became forever hated and shunned by the entire Royal Family and therefore went into exile, he could have chosen any other woman, but she was the only one for him

  • @johnpickford4222
    @johnpickford4222 Рік тому +11

    Is the dark haired woman standing by him in this scene and on the couch when he speaks on the radio supposed to be Wallis Warfield Simpson? Because she wasn’t with him when this occurred; I thought she was being driven to southern France. Another playing with facts that THE CROWN does so well!!

    • @gidzmobug2323
      @gidzmobug2323 8 місяців тому

      She may have been a secretary or an assistant of some sort.

    • @michaelmeyer2725
      @michaelmeyer2725 7 місяців тому +1

      The show is a drama, not a documentary. They don't pretend to say the events that they show are historically accurate.

  • @williamjolliffe2914
    @williamjolliffe2914 Рік тому +5

    'The Crown' should reflect reality. Edward VIII chose not to serve his people. By contrast, Elizabeth II's life of service remind us of the huge, tangible power for peace and stability the British monarchy is for everyone in Britain, the commonwealth and for the world. In the 19th & 20th centuries the U.S.A, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Greece suffered in various ways civil wars, political storms, and dictatorships. This shows what can go wrong in the absence of a head of state which is above politics, which opposes illegal dictatorship and helps keep the peace. If there are many reasons England, Wales, Scotland, Canada and Australia have had no civil war since Culloden in 1746, having a constitutional monarchy to unify all the people is an important one. In the UK, 'peace' in formal speech is "The Queen's Peace".
    Of course Elizabeth II & Prince Philip had their failings as parents, and Prince Philip could be tactless. Whatever mistakes the royal family have made, let us be grateful for the service they give, and for the difference the monarchy makes for the better, in the world. There will always be violence in the world, and billions of people who know or understand nothing of the British monarchy. The value of the British crown since the 1700s is, many billions of people have lived under it without civil war, lynching, dictatorship in their lives.

    • @mariaeddycesario3067
      @mariaeddycesario3067 Рік тому

      Mel Brooks is wrong: it's not good to be a king - or queen.

    • @hi-ls6lt
      @hi-ls6lt Рік тому

      Maybe if you knew about law, you’d realise that over the years, monarch’s political power is waning to the point that one day there will be no use for them

    • @johnpickford4222
      @johnpickford4222 Рік тому

      WILLIAM JOLLIFFE: Get real. It’s fiction based on historical events and to be taken as seriously.

  • @Thepateisgreat
    @Thepateisgreat 6 місяців тому

    Queen Mary was such a g

  • @shelbyorphanage9199
    @shelbyorphanage9199 Рік тому +1

    Netflix needs to make a movie about the massacres glenn cove, Scotland

  • @MightyJosh1985
    @MightyJosh1985 Місяць тому

    People forget that Elizabeth would have been Queen even without the abdication. King Edward VII had no children with Wallis Simpson and the Duke of York/King George VI died in 1952. This would have moved Elizabeth to the next in line as heir presumptive. When Edward dies in 1972 with no children Elizabeth becomes Queen, just 20 years later.

  • @MathewRenfro
    @MathewRenfro 8 місяців тому +1

    That broad yoko ono'ed the British empire

  • @rah62
    @rah62 Рік тому +12

    1:08 - incorrect - he was introduced as The Prince Edward.

    • @briandfallon74
      @briandfallon74 Рік тому +8

      Correct, as he was created Duke of Windsor the day after His Late Majesty George VI became King.

    • @gidzmobug2323
      @gidzmobug2323 Рік тому

      ​@言行一致 The Letters Patent creating the Windsor title specified:
      *That it was for Edward's lifetime only.
      *Only Edward was to be HRH Prince (a move that some thought went against convention).
      *The title could not be inherited by any children from the marriage. They would be Mr. Or Miss (a moot point, as the marriage was childless).

  • @gabygaby5701
    @gabygaby5701 Рік тому

    All those strings of pearls….

  • @Tygearianus
    @Tygearianus 6 місяців тому +6

    We got a second Elizabethan age thanks to this abdication. I think it worked out exactly has it meant to.

    • @loner1878
      @loner1878 6 місяців тому +1

      She would have been Queen regardless when he died since he had no children and his brother died decades before.

  • @thedukeofswellington1827
    @thedukeofswellington1827 5 місяців тому

    We were deff spared a terrible king in david

  • @AndreAFirenze
    @AndreAFirenze Рік тому +2

    Wallis wasn’t there.

  • @huascar66
    @huascar66 10 місяців тому +3

    This is somewhat inaccurate. The scene where Queen Mary confronts the uncrowned King one last time, Wallis Simpson was already in the south of France, where she had fled to escape the voracious British press and to hope that the King Edward VIII would change his mind and decide not to abdicate.

  • @dlnec1
    @dlnec1 2 місяці тому

    Wallis was skulking in France, not there at all

  • @user-zd3qb2hu1n
    @user-zd3qb2hu1n 6 місяців тому

    Wallis wasn't in the country let alone in the room.

  • @matthewsuderman5612
    @matthewsuderman5612 Місяць тому

    Walis was in France

  • @Thepateisgreat
    @Thepateisgreat Місяць тому

    Even if he didn’t abdicate, and Hitler somehow didn’t take England had he not abdicated; Elizabeth still would have ended up being Queen at some point. I feel like no one gets that

  • @alenaputri908
    @alenaputri908 Рік тому

    Pemeran ratu Elizabeth II versi kecilnya kayak lady sarah anaknya putri Margaret

  • @apswim87
    @apswim87 6 місяців тому

    Not many people recognize this that if Edward VIII had not abdicated Elizabeth would have been Queen anyways much later but still.

    • @youknow227
      @youknow227 4 місяці тому

      1972 it would have been

  • @sylvainmarc2638
    @sylvainmarc2638 7 місяців тому

    So the Yorkist has won the war of the roses after All 😅 More seriously... How horrific it must be to live their lives, maybe you got "power", money etc... But I find it so dreadful. I would rather die than live in that conditions.

  • @madisworld
    @madisworld 6 місяців тому +1

    I hated how Edward treated Bertie.

  • @k1godwin361
    @k1godwin361 Рік тому

    Sad.

  • @bexie1992
    @bexie1992 Рік тому +1

    Why is there no sound?

    • @johnpickford4222
      @johnpickford4222 Рік тому

      Rebekah Chapman: The abdication was so hurtful to the that the Royal Family they couldn’t speak.

  • @st-ko5zo
    @st-ko5zo Рік тому +1

    And superficially we think that for the royals getting married to anyone they like would have been much easier than commoners😝

    • @aegonthedragon7303
      @aegonthedragon7303 Рік тому

      Eddie VIII got removed mainly because his potential alignment to Nazi Germany and praise of Adolf Hitler (Wallace Simpson was believed a Nazi sympathizer as well). The cabinet in the UK were worried that in a war Edward would sell out to the Germans so they forced him to abdicate, using his marriage plan as the reason.

  • @stephenrossiter2679
    @stephenrossiter2679 Рік тому +2

    At least he was just a traitor not an adulterous blasphemer like the new weirdo on the throne.

    • @malopephasha5341
      @malopephasha5341 8 місяців тому +2

      Mate a traitor is worse

    • @loner1878
      @loner1878 6 місяців тому

      Hunny, he was a nazi. And every king has been an adulterer, don't be naive.

  • @JS-te2vj
    @JS-te2vj 8 місяців тому +4

    As much as I feel sorry for George, and his family line to this day, every Royal is given what ordinary folk would consider tremendously unfair priveliges and wealth in exchange for their duty, and readiness for a situation where the monarchy should die or abdicate.
    They may mess around while prince or princess, but once the calling comes, they must perform. In that sense, George VI adapted soundly, Queen Elizabeth stoic in her duty, and Charles loving to his people and proud of his country. Edward VIII should be ashamed of himself - a lifetime to prepare, and threw away his duties for a marriage outside his league😅

  • @Chuck0856
    @Chuck0856 5 місяців тому

    this scene is entirely fiction -- Mary only met Wallis once, at a palace reception.

  • @dukehiroto8714
    @dukehiroto8714 6 місяців тому

    Wallis was not with him around that time ... definitely the scene of the two with Queen Mary is wrong. No?

  • @diversion8654
    @diversion8654 Рік тому

    Soy yo o jorge vi no seve muy feliz al ver que ahorra sera rey

  • @mattep74
    @mattep74 Рік тому +22

    They should have saved the actor for s4 to 6 and have him play charles.

    • @raiderglace8641
      @raiderglace8641 Рік тому +10

      Ironically he does play Charles in The Queen

    • @mattep74
      @mattep74 Рік тому +1

      @@raiderglace8641 thats what I ment. He is so like charles that he could be his body double

    • @raiderglace8641
      @raiderglace8641 Рік тому +2

      @@mattep74 Oh I agree. they did get a pretty good actor for the 90's version for the Crown tho.

    • @benjamingygi3327
      @benjamingygi3327 Рік тому

      Charles also married a divorced women just like Edward the only difference is that Edward was forced to abdicate the throne

    • @nrafter530
      @nrafter530 Рік тому +1

      He played Charles in The Queen

  • @catlover2652
    @catlover2652 5 місяців тому

    Charles should have stepped down, or and stood up to Elizabeth,and his granny Elizabeth.
    Too stay with Camilla .
    Elizabeth,put her foot down,to marry Phillip ,and got to marry the man she wanted .
    She pulled the same,with Anne and Margaret ,who weren’t allowed to marry the men they wanted .
    Margret ended up a mess, Luckily Anne was stronger.
    This guy married ,the woman he loved, since he told a big F you to his crown.

  • @efiaahimah3713
    @efiaahimah3713 Рік тому +11

    She completely ignored Wallis' courtesy 😅🤔. Should've gotten married first and have children.

    • @johnpickford4222
      @johnpickford4222 Рік тому +3

      Efia Ahimah: I believe Mrs. Simpson had left the country and was in France. Other shows indicate she did not want him to abdicate. I also believe Queen Mary would have walked out of the room had she seen her.

    • @ClaudiaRPost
      @ClaudiaRPost Рік тому +1

      Queen Mary was interesting.🙂

    • @gidzmobug2323
      @gidzmobug2323 8 місяців тому +1

      I think the lady might have been a secretary or an assistant.

  • @stuartlee6622
    @stuartlee6622 Рік тому

    No.

  • @platero1993
    @platero1993 Рік тому +1

    Season one is a huge difference in quality compare to season 5. Not saying it was a bad season tho

  • @lexusdriver1963
    @lexusdriver1963 Рік тому +1

    The reason why Edward abdicated is because of marrying an American who was a divorcee and it's frowned upon in the royal family.

    • @aegonthedragon7303
      @aegonthedragon7303 Рік тому +4

      It was also because he had positive opinions of Hitler/Nazi Germany and it was feared that he would allow fascists like Oswald Mosley to gain high spots of power in the UK government.

    • @johnpickford4222
      @johnpickford4222 Рік тому

      Lexus Driver: Well times and attitudes change. Look how welcome they made Meghan feel! And she was bi-racial but per William, “They most certainly are not a racist family.” WRONG!!

    • @MightyJosh1985
      @MightyJosh1985 Місяць тому

      It was far bigger than that. Parliament was not going to accept it. Even if Stanley Baldwin somehow convinced the UK parliament to approve it, the other realms were against it. They are not just King of the UK, but Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and South Africa (at this time) and they were not happy with the marriage to a divorcee. British monarchs rule by parliament as constitutional monarchs.
      "The Australian High Commissioner Stanley Bruce already indicated to Baldwin that Prime Minister Joseph Lyons regarded any form of marriage to Wallis as unacceptable. Bruce claimed he was so distressed he and his wife would refuse to attend the Coronation. Abdication was the only solution.
      Lyons followed up with a cable, “There would be outspoken hostility to His Majesty’s proposed wife becoming Queen while any proposal that she should become consort and not Queen … would not be approved by my Government.”

    • @lexusdriver1963
      @lexusdriver1963 Місяць тому

      @@MightyJosh1985 Wow! You learn something new everyday.

    • @lexusdriver1963
      @lexusdriver1963 Місяць тому

      @@MightyJosh1985 So even though Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin covinced the UK Parliament to approve it, the other realms were against it because they believe it would set a bad example for the Commonwealth realms?

  • @susangarland6869
    @susangarland6869 Рік тому +4

    So Edward had to abdicate because he couldn't marry a divorcee, but Charles became King even though he cheated on his wife with a married woman and later married that woman when they each divorced their spouses. If ethics change according to the times, then they're not worth anything during their times.

    • @gidzmobug2323
      @gidzmobug2323 Рік тому +5

      The Church of England has also changed their rules on divorce and remarriage since Edward. It was much more conservative then.

    • @CMOT101
      @CMOT101 Рік тому +6

      There were other issues. Not spoken of at the time, mainly their love of Nazis.

    • @cg8397
      @cg8397 Рік тому +1

      ​@@gidzmobug2323The CofE changed the rules because of Charles, there was a quiet campaign that began soon after Margaret died

    • @agentrikamcgee
      @agentrikamcgee 7 місяців тому +2

      Tbh my opinion is that Wallis was probably just the straw that broke the camel's back. Apparently it was known that Edward was quite neglectful of his duties even before he became king (for example he was apparently notorious for leaving confidential papers out in the open for his party guests to read). With a war on the horizon, the establishment was already wondering if this guy was gonna be able to lead them- then for a consort he chose Wallis, who was 1) still married to her husband when Edward announced his intention to marry her and 2) literally in bed with Nazis.
      Heck, his own father George V already had misgivings about him when he was still Prince of Wales. He famously remarked that he wished Edward would never have children so nothing would stand between Bertie and Lilibet and the throne. AND he foretold that Edward would ruin himself within a year of his death. Not exactly a shining endorsement for his ability as a future king.

    • @MightyJosh1985
      @MightyJosh1985 Місяць тому

      Different times and a different woman. In the 1930's Mrs Simpson was seen as a social climber, a twice-divorced woman. At that time the Church of England did not allow a divorced person to remarry or marry if their ex-spouse was still alive. She was also an American and of low birth, with no royal or noble blood.
      Charles was different, as times changed. The Church of England had changed it policies. Camilla was not of low birth as her family was nobility. Not to mention that they were long time lovers. They were always meant to be together.
      Side note. Dianna had more affairs than Charles.

  • @DrunkLuna
    @DrunkLuna Рік тому +10

    Harry and Meghan need to take that wise advice at 0:33 and become private citizens

    • @AquaFonic
      @AquaFonic Місяць тому

      CHANGE your record THE NEEDLE is stuck !!!

  • @caratacus6204
    @caratacus6204 Рік тому +4

    What is it about Royals and ambitious divorced American women? Like moths to a flame…

    • @johnpickford4222
      @johnpickford4222 Рік тому

      Caratacus: I take it you couldn’t land one? Also, American women are supposed to be ‘wild’ in bed compared to the English.

  • @eyesofibad2461
    @eyesofibad2461 4 місяці тому

    To this day, for this part in particular (the abdication, not the nazi stuff), i cant understand all the hate for him. He wanted to marry for love, he couldnt, he left, end of story. Why the hell the hate? WTFFF

    • @brianredmond4919
      @brianredmond4919 3 місяці тому

      Something to do with his supporting the nazis against his own people ?. And being a doormat for that nasty american woman ?.

  • @AzguardMike
    @AzguardMike Місяць тому

    "noone wants to hear what you have to say"
    take note, Harry and Meghan.

    • @AquaFonic
      @AquaFonic Місяць тому

      CHANGE your record THE NEEDLE is stuck NO ONE WANTS TO HEAR YOU EITHER !

  • @LordSpleach
    @LordSpleach Рік тому

    Baltimore=2 Britain=0