Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

7 Watches Cheaper Than A Rolex Submariner BUT Are HIGHER END !

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 сер 2024
  • 7 Watches Cheaper Than A Rolex Submariner BUT Are HIGHER END !
    In todays video of Federico Talks Watches I talk about 7 everyday watches that are higher end than a Rolex Submariner. The Rolex submariner is the world most iconic watch, but there are more luxurious pieces out there. Watches from Vacheron Constantin, Breguet, H Moser and more just to name a few. Let me know what you think in the comments section below.
    CHECK OUT delraywatch.com/
    Shame On Wrist Instagram:
    / shameonwrist
    Affiliate links
    Seiko Turtle: amzn.to/2jdk4C7
    Seiko SKX: amzn.to/2kX3li8
    Seiko SKX Black: amzn.to/2krNATS
    TOP 5 SWISS WATCHES UNDER $500 (affiliate links)
    Hamilton Khaki King: amzn.to/2iUhtqZ
    Luminox: amzn.to/2jWl0qG
    Tissot PRS 516: amzn.to/2iL2Rzh
    Victorinox Maverick: amzn.to/2jyk3VB
    Tissot Powermatic: amzn.to/2iU6tdc

КОМЕНТАРІ • 418

  • @midas1929
    @midas1929 4 роки тому +46

    Omega Speedmaster and Seamaster. As good as Rolex, cheaper new.

    • @billcore6295
      @billcore6295 3 роки тому +4

      I own a seamaster it's better than a sub

    • @billcore6295
      @billcore6295 3 роки тому

      @Chong Li I own a two tone black bay and yes it is a great watch

    • @jimlittle5769
      @jimlittle5769 3 роки тому +6

      @@billcore6295 Absolutely true. Apparently Frederico couldn't bring himself to mention the most obvious choice: The Seamaster.

    • @midas1929
      @midas1929 3 роки тому +1

      @Mrs Doubtfire My speedy was with me in the Andes, Amazonas and Congo. And yes it was many times in the water.

    • @soulboxphoto
      @soulboxphoto 2 роки тому +1

      @@jimlittle5769 thats because his video is about higher end watches that are cheaper than Rolex not better watches that are cheaper than Rolex. Omega and Rolex are at the same level horologically. Omega is not high end. I agree that its better in terms of what you get for the money but its not higher end.

  • @rozsgyi
    @rozsgyi 4 роки тому +19

    Before watching the vid, my tips: H. Moser Pioneer, Jlc Reverso or Master Compressor, Cartier Santos, Bulgari Octo, Grand Seiko, Omega seamaster co-axial, Zenith Defy

  • @WDNCh
    @WDNCh 4 роки тому +45

    Tudor Pelagos is the real deal
    Only 3-4k, titanium case, inhouse movement with 70 hr power reserve, 500m water resistence, insane lume, and looks way better than a sub

    • @evh4611
      @evh4611 4 роки тому +1

      Only grade two titanium. Even the Seiko Shogun has grade five titanium.

    • @gI-jl3lq
      @gI-jl3lq 4 роки тому

      Have you tried one on? I have and in no way does it look better than a Sub!!!

    • @WDNCh
      @WDNCh 4 роки тому +3

      I own both and the sub is just boring tbh. It‘s a nice investment though. Pelagos for wear, Sub for the safe.

    • @CosmicPipe
      @CosmicPipe 3 роки тому +1

      @@evh4611 No question grade 5 is the good stuff. When compared with Titanium grade 5 (Ti 6Al-4V), Titanium grade 2 is generally selected where aqueous corrosion resistance and/or formability are required. In regard to metallurgy, the Brinell Hardness of Ti grade 2 is in the 200 range where 316L and 904L ("Oystersteel") are roughly 200 and 160 respectively. As a material selection for dive watch design... Ti grade 2 is pretty awesome.

  • @rfern263
    @rfern263 4 роки тому +122

    The point is well made. Rolex is overpriced and paying today’s inflated prices for Rolex is just plain dumb.

    • @iamsheep
      @iamsheep 4 роки тому +8

      It’s the status symbol, but they also retain their value. It’s hard to argue getting one either

    • @kronikinsomniak
      @kronikinsomniak 4 роки тому

      @MA Campisi which VC model did you buy?

    • @FatSamEIE
      @FatSamEIE 4 роки тому +10

      Why is it dumb? If you have the money and want the watch, buy it. Maybe it would be dumb for you, but not everyone has your point of view and/or budget.

    • @gregsolovieff6711
      @gregsolovieff6711 4 роки тому

      MA Campisi I’d get the VC! It’s so special!

    • @benoitbauer953
      @benoitbauer953 4 роки тому +5

      I bought my Sub 114060 at retail price. I can wear it 2 year and sell it for the same price if not with a profit; What's dumb about that? I have tried all current Seamster models and none can match the Sub when it come to dressing up. Rolex will simply throw in their new movement and twick it a bit and put the Seamaster to shame. Nothing against Seamaster, I actually bought one, the 2255.80 (Electric Blue), 41m, comes with the Speedster bracelet (not the ugly Bond). Omega is my "sport" diver (T-shirt/Polo) and my Sub is definitely on the dressier side of the spectrum (shirt and jacket). Just need to be smart and enjoy the best of both world :)

  • @hormazdirani1431
    @hormazdirani1431 4 роки тому +5

    I thank you Federico for the love and respect you showed for the very mature watchmaker H.Moser & Co. They truly are the gems which more of us should discover.

  • @jamesg4670
    @jamesg4670 4 роки тому +8

    Its actually unreal the amount of better/higher end watches you can buy for the submariner at retail price let alone resale

  • @MAKESQ
    @MAKESQ 4 роки тому +11

    I've got that 50 Fathoms and it is nice! Have had it for years, never got tired of it.

  • @7292ale
    @7292ale 4 роки тому +46

    What about Grand Seiko? Probably the best choice today: vert high finishing, spring drive accuracy and great price

  • @stephenlewis3620
    @stephenlewis3620 4 роки тому +18

    In a long line of excellent videos, this is right near the top. A terrific subject that needs more exploration, and very well done. A+++

    • @user-wi9nn6dz8w
      @user-wi9nn6dz8w 4 роки тому

      I bought the VC Overseas 2 brand new with full warranty from an AD in the Us for the price of a Submariner back in 2016.

  • @defenstrator4660
    @defenstrator4660 4 роки тому +34

    I’ve looked at the Blanc Pain but they seem just as expensive.

    • @LiquidSm0ke
      @LiquidSm0ke 4 роки тому

      Defenstrator yes they hold there value very well

  • @evh4611
    @evh4611 4 роки тому +6

    I tell you all this channel is one the very best watch channels on UA-cam. Hands Down

  • @nrbrown5985
    @nrbrown5985 4 роки тому +62

    I'd argue that most of the Grand Seiko line is higher end than Rolex too.

    • @diegobittar7425
      @diegobittar7425 4 роки тому +9

      Japanese makes everything better. Now they are into making the best whisky (and they will do it). Maybe some day they would like to make the best empanada, and they will. But one thing... They set themselves to win over an specific target, and that is their strategy, when they learn the rule of a game and play it better than the masters. But they do not create games. They learned from the Swiss the best manufacturers, they did the best quartz movement, but didn't invented it. I love them, I love Seiko and Grand Seiko and knowing that are reinterpretation of Rolex, even all that tzaratzu polished, there is a Rolex inspired deep down.

    • @VersedNJ
      @VersedNJ 4 роки тому +1

      I agree and a consideration. Might be one of my next watches. I don't have quartz hate. It comes to the movement

    • @subscriberwithoutanyvide-rq5ym
      @subscriberwithoutanyvide-rq5ym 4 роки тому

      Yes

    • @diegosauma9957
      @diegosauma9957 4 роки тому +2

      @@diegobittar7425 I would definitely not say that Grand Seiko is a reinterpretation of Rolex since it carries all the DNA from Seiko (founded 40 years before Rolex) but to the higher standards they could achieve. And if just takes to compare one to each other to realize they are extremely different.

    • @claytonberg721
      @claytonberg721 4 роки тому +3

      In most ways yes. While the bracelet is finished better it doesn't feel as substantial as the sub.
      Case finishing and dial finishing, there is no comparison, GS takes rolex to the woodshed. Fed is not a GS fan though, he'll never rave about them.

  • @randyallen2771
    @randyallen2771 4 роки тому +18

    Great piece Fed, appreciate you taking time to put out something thoughtful that challenges the viewers to really explore higher horology watches instead of following the conventional pattern and drowning themselves in the whole Rolex whirlpool.
    Might we have more please?

  • @totisanchez3607
    @totisanchez3607 4 роки тому +11

    You had me at Blancpain!
    Agree with you Feds.
    Last two videos are home runs.
    Take care

  • @rickgreen7393
    @rickgreen7393 4 роки тому +7

    Federico this is the best video you made so far in my humble opinion! You absolutely nailed it! This is a perfect list

  • @Mili_the_Gauss
    @Mili_the_Gauss 4 роки тому +5

    I thought that the Zenith el Premero and at least one JLC would have made the list but couldn't agree more with the Breguet marine and the Type XX.

  • @stratocaster9631
    @stratocaster9631 2 роки тому +1

    These type of videos help Rolex stay at the top of the sales rank as people perceive it further as the go to brand that everyone desires and every other brand is compared to.

  • @InChristJesus87
    @InChristJesus87 4 роки тому +7

    I'm all for announcing companies most people don't know but as a worthy mention I think the Seamaster 300M should have been on the list.

    • @Ronaldalan114
      @Ronaldalan114 4 роки тому

      InChrist87 couldn’t agree more. I have to disagree with every choice he listed from a depreciation point of view

  • @davidmeier8860
    @davidmeier8860 4 роки тому +8

    The GO is probably my favorite on the listt for a regular, everyday watch. They're so well made.

  • @josephknecht4272
    @josephknecht4272 4 роки тому +4

    The Roger Dubuis Easy Diver is one of the greatest watches ever made. The curvaceous and symmetrical case design is both highly creative and technically brilliant: sexy and masculine at the same time. The movement is better finished than a Patek's. Moreover, it is 300 meters water resistant. In short, the watch is a marriage between a Rolex, a Patek, and an F.P. Journe.

  • @daniellee8162
    @daniellee8162 4 роки тому +43

    "Rolex, the king of marketing"

    • @Ronaldalan114
      @Ronaldalan114 4 роки тому +1

      Daniel Lee I would agree. And that makes me feel good as an owner for the value of my time pieces moving forward.

    • @daniellee8162
      @daniellee8162 4 роки тому

      @@Ronaldalan114 don't get me wrong, they are excellent pieces and at the price they sell, I'd sure hope they hold the value and that marketing keeps it that way.

    • @rickgreen7393
      @rickgreen7393 3 роки тому +1

      Bravo! I would add, "the King of Unethical Marketing".

  • @fpoynton1604
    @fpoynton1604 4 роки тому +2

    Fed - this was a fantastic program. The watches you shared had such artismal character, class , interesting design, unique identity , history, amazing quality - they presented as a remarkably interesting and fascinating collection in themselves. Just so much more interesting then a collection of only one or two brands. Very cool.

  • @specialkfouryou
    @specialkfouryou 4 роки тому +23

    At retail, a lot of the Rolex catalog, including the Sub is hard to argue with....at the prices some people are paying second hand....not worth it at all. Why anyone would pay 15k+ for a current GMT or Hulk is beyond me.

    • @0dium.
      @0dium. 4 роки тому +3

      hype corrodes the human spirit .. that's the reason

    • @specialkfouryou
      @specialkfouryou 4 роки тому

      @@0dium. Well said

  • @anotherknight75
    @anotherknight75 4 роки тому +13

    That Blancpain.... one day, one day.

  • @TheChosenOne_
    @TheChosenOne_ 4 роки тому +5

    Great topic. Would love to have more of that kind. High end stuff for a rather small price compared to inflated pieces

  • @richardi5647
    @richardi5647 4 роки тому +9

    “Carrying the water” for watch collecting again! Thank you. 😀

  • @aaradill
    @aaradill 4 роки тому +4

    Kudos, Fede for always coming up with new topics that are truly relevant to everyday watch enthusiasts who may lack expertise (like myself). Thank you!

  • @joelopic
    @joelopic 3 роки тому +1

    Fantastic info. Most have not heard of half of these brands hence opening up a whole new shopping world of interest. Great work Fed. Thank you

  • @TKsheng
    @TKsheng 4 роки тому +6

    Everytime i see a video taking about the sub, i always count myself lucky to have bought the no date ceramic sub at a hair below 9k sgd retail after discount in 2012. Phew.
    Great video as always Federico! And keep up the good work! Nice GP btw!

  • @johnkayode1617
    @johnkayode1617 4 роки тому +6

    Thanks for the information. There is much more to explore in horology outside Rolex

  • @finkejak
    @finkejak 4 роки тому +5

    Gotta love Moser... Though with Vacheron in the race, that's a tough call.

  • @guannan5085
    @guannan5085 4 роки тому +7

    Love that Roger Dubuis! Such an underrated brand. I know its designs are not for everyone but you can only appreciate it when you see the watch up close

  • @wesleybommer6092
    @wesleybommer6092 4 роки тому +5

    The craftsmanship and detail that goes into a Breguet blows away the well built ordinary of a Rolex 10 out of 10 times.

  • @DonutIgnoramus
    @DonutIgnoramus 4 роки тому +3

    I take Metro North New Haven line everyday from Greenwich. I see at least 5 subs before I leave the train and about 5-10 walking to my job in mid town. After a short lunch break and walking back to Grand Central I will have seen an additional 10-20 subs. While the sub is a beautiful watch, they are a dime a dozen and are purely a status symbol to most from what I gather.

  • @pedrosaenz2800
    @pedrosaenz2800 4 роки тому +53

    Submariner waa never a luxury watch. People and market turned a tool watch into a luxury item. 😎

    • @UGA.D
      @UGA.D 4 роки тому +7

      You can thank the AP Royal Oak for that. Designed in a day and pushed out the door for 3300 Swiss Francs (in 1972 money!) for a steel watch. That was more than a gold Patek and more than TEN TIMES the submariner.

    • @Rainism969
      @Rainism969 4 роки тому

      Its a “luxury sport watch” but never been a dress watch.
      You can wear Submariner with business suit but not with black-tie.

    • @UGA.D
      @UGA.D 4 роки тому +3

      @@highnrising I'd say Rolex was a tool and Tudor a less expensive tool. I know a few different fellows who are original owners of submariners going back to the 60s and 70s and they are very clear that they were not luxury items when purchased.

    • @jimbeam4111
      @jimbeam4111 4 роки тому

      賜龍怜音 unless you’re an early James Bond

    • @Rainism969
      @Rainism969 4 роки тому

      @@jimbeam4111 exactly

  • @bubbab7792
    @bubbab7792 4 роки тому +6

    Nice job Fed. I like Rolex, just ain’t paying the price, nice alternatives. 👍

  • @erikdewilde7404
    @erikdewilde7404 4 роки тому +6

    You forgot Jeager Lecoultre

    • @FatSamEIE
      @FatSamEIE 4 роки тому

      A reverso small seconds(the newish blue one)- absolutely stunning watch and my next "proper" purchase

  • @JK-nt8lf
    @JK-nt8lf 4 роки тому +3

    Actually this is my price point for my next watch, less than 10k. I have experienced a lot of brands like Omega, GS, Brietling, and etc and looking to move up in terms of price. Do I go Rolex or entry level haute horology?

    • @scuderia747bhp
      @scuderia747bhp 4 роки тому

      Skip the Rolex go for the AP 😉. You can do it.

    • @mbnb007
      @mbnb007 4 роки тому

      If your like subs, and you can get one at RRP then it a no brainer, but ultimately it depends what 'you' like the most.. personally i cant take out the 'loss' factor when buying expensive watches, so I look at what 'I' like and how much i could potentially lose in a worst case scenario ie dont like the watch anymore or I had to sell in a worst case financial situation..

  • @YY-nd8lz
    @YY-nd8lz 4 роки тому +5

    And there are a lot more:
    - Girard Perregaux Laureato (not a dive watch)
    - Chopard L.U.C. Pro One Diver and L.U.C Pro One GMT
    - Blancpain Air Command Flyback
    - Ulysse Nardin Maxi Marine Diver
    - a lot of Divers from Omega
    - IWC Ingenieur and DaVinci (even as a perpetual calendar)
    - Hermès Dressage with In-house caliber (Vaucher), ok no diver
    - Parmigiani (no Divers)
    - and more and more and more ...
    And btw, I really like my GMT II

    • @cecedabo
      @cecedabo 4 роки тому

      an6 Ingenieur is well made for sure but wouldnt pay that much for a Sellita... Agree with the rest of the list tho

  • @Ronaldalan114
    @Ronaldalan114 4 роки тому +1

    My question is how do all of these watches you suggest, hold up in value in the secondary market? Have they appreciated in the last 5 years? A Rolex quite frankly doesn’t cost a dime. When I invest in the right time piece, and I wait and buy new at retail, the day I leave my dealer, my net worth has increased. I could care less if I’m paying $7K for a watch or $14K for a watch, what I care about is my net worth the day after my purchase. Rolex provides that security, AP, provides that, Patek provides that. A small collection of other watches provide that, but perhaps not across their entire brand offerings.

    • @user-dr7tb4xf4o
      @user-dr7tb4xf4o 4 роки тому +1

      Ron Sterud all of these watches don't hold up in value very well, that's the reason you can pick them up for cheaper than a Sub. I think that's the whole point of the video. Most of the watches he presented if not all, originally cost more than a Submariner, but through depreciation they now can be bought for less money than a Sub in the secondary market; so you get a watch which has better build quality, better movements, better finishing than what you would get with the Submariner. So obviously these watches are not for you, since you care about resale value, and there's nothing wrong with that; but for some people who don't care about resale value since they're never going to sell their watches anyway, and just care about the quality of the product they're getting for the money they're spending, then these watches could be really good options.

    • @Ronaldalan114
      @Ronaldalan114 4 роки тому

      B S in my collection, I have some seriously depreciated watches, I call them jewelry lol. But for those watches, my budget is under $5,000 for those pieces. For anything more expensive, I keep close tabs on the secondary market. If I can pick up some high horological for 60% below retail, I’ll consider it, however, I consider more how it dropped 60% and if it’s possible it could drop more. For example, I wouldn’t touch a Roger Dubuis, due to the unknown future of the brand under a VC.

  • @ClinicalDecisionYikesYT
    @ClinicalDecisionYikesYT 4 роки тому +2

    I have not seen the video yet, but I expect them to be Invictas with Popeye and Garfield on the dial, or I'm gonna riot!! I'm kidding obviously. Thanks for brightening up Monday, Fed.

  • @diegosauma9957
    @diegosauma9957 4 роки тому +6

    You always show some amazing watches Federico. But I don't get why you wouldn't put a Grand Seiko on the list, they are amazing value and higher end than Rolex for sure

    • @pedrosaenz2800
      @pedrosaenz2800 4 роки тому +7

      And an Omega Seamaster 300m !! By far the best contender....

  • @terrytong9251
    @terrytong9251 4 роки тому +2

    Most of these watches are more expensive then the Rolex sub. Such as the Blancpain, Vacheron, Moser. Or am I incorrect?

    • @user-dr7tb4xf4o
      @user-dr7tb4xf4o 4 роки тому +1

      He's talking about how much you could get one preowned, not retail price; especially now that people are paying over retail for Rolex.

    • @terrytong9251
      @terrytong9251 4 роки тому

      B S ahhh cool. Was misled by the title. Cheers

  • @phillipskillern5513
    @phillipskillern5513 4 роки тому +1

    Great vid Fed! Love seeing you wear the GP. Between the VC Overseas vs. GP Laureato, which would be you choice? Keep up the content.

  • @gregsnavely9272
    @gregsnavely9272 4 роки тому +1

    i just picked up my Sub for $5,500. I was actually looking for Explorer 2 when I was able to strike this deal. It is a no date 1997 sub that is basically flawless.

  • @williamrizzo1285
    @williamrizzo1285 4 роки тому +14

    I would like to add the Omega Seamaster 300M.

    • @UGA.D
      @UGA.D 4 роки тому +7

      Saw them in the ATL boutique, yesterday. So much better of a machine than a Rolex sub.

    • @mirwaissnajibi
      @mirwaissnajibi 4 роки тому

      @Al B. I like the double clasp on some of the models and the switch on some of the others

  • @timgraley3019
    @timgraley3019 4 роки тому +2

    Hey Fed... What a superb video. I had no idea the Fifty Fathoms could be had for less than a Rolex Sub. The Roger Dubuis is absolutely stunning. I have always wanted to own one some day. Thank you for this video and showing us what's out there that is cheaper than the Sub. I would like to see more of this type of video. I am not a big fan of Rolex and do not desire to own one.
    May peace be with you and your family always!

  • @asssets
    @asssets 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you for this vid, I'm tired to see same watches on youtube. Will get back to this video when shopping for 5-7 grand piece.

  • @jamess8175
    @jamess8175 4 роки тому +1

    Rolex buyers are only after value retention and resale value, not about "high-end" or "high horology". That's why it doesn't take a very well-informed buyer to settle for a Rolex.
    For US$10,000, I would prefer the Breguet Type XXI in full bracelet. The watch simply oozes quality and craftsmanship, yet features a flyback chronograph with two hands and having the second hand stacked on top of the other. So well made, you can't even tell there are two hands stacked up at the 12 o'clock home position unless one has moved away. Impeccable quality and calibration.

    • @mbnb007
      @mbnb007 4 роки тому

      while i agree retention and resale is important to rolex owners I would suggest wearing a watch that says "Rolex" on it is the most important thing... I would argue that a watch buyer that buys a watch that has good retention and resale value IS a 'well informed' buyer... Rolex from a high horological stand point is very important especially in the historical innovation they have patented through the years..

  • @sealevelbear
    @sealevelbear 4 роки тому +2

    Breguet always captures my eye and my heart.

  • @karlomcastro
    @karlomcastro 4 роки тому +6

    I appreciate your thoughts on this subject, Federico. Certainly there are many well-made watches (arguably better made than the Sub) at a lower price point. As you pointed out, watches like the Blancplain you showed are less expensive than the Sub in the pre-owned market. At MSRP, the Fifthy Fathoms and some of the others you showed are actually more expensive. Surely many other watch brands would like to be in the position of Rolex wherein they can increase prices and limit production and still be fine. Most often than not though, buying and owning a watch is all about feelings. Either you love a timepiece or you don't. Cheers!

  • @rumporridge1
    @rumporridge1 4 роки тому +1

    Fed you had two watches on my short list. Blancpain and the Brequet Type XX. Awesome list as a whole. And yes I do love my ceramic sub lol.

  • @paulsholtz6520
    @paulsholtz6520 4 роки тому +1

    Breguet Type XX chronograph is beautiful but I don't know that it's waterproof or competes directly w/ a Submariner. Nice list, I would have included the JLC Master Compressor line, out-of-production but gorgeous sports watches that can be had at a steal.

  • @SirBitchalot
    @SirBitchalot 4 роки тому +9

    I'd give my right arm to own an H Moser. (Not the left arm. I need that one to wear the watch.)

  • @rafaelbarajas7045
    @rafaelbarajas7045 4 роки тому +1

    I would have added the new ceramic wave dial omega. Technologically better in a good number of ways, high attention to detail, a third of the price. keep up the good content Fed, cheers

  • @shergar2075
    @shergar2075 4 роки тому +15

    Rolex has become a fashion brand every mug must have one

    • @tiberiu_nicolae
      @tiberiu_nicolae 4 роки тому +1

      I feel that Rolex telegraphs Nouveau Riche...

    • @smashexentertainment676
      @smashexentertainment676 4 роки тому

      Mainstream Rolex like batman, pepsi, hulk, sub, yeah, boring stuff. But they also have Sky Dweller, Root Beer etc. Gorgeous pieces.

  • @ResetToZero3210
    @ResetToZero3210 4 місяці тому

    Funny, I never considered Rolex watches cool…they seem so “blah”, predictable. I do respect the brand but if you are looking for understated elegance and real exclusivity, I fully agree with Frederico. I got the Oris Aquis blue dial…the coolest dive watch ever and very well made. My next one will be the Blancpain.

  • @SiCutler
    @SiCutler 4 роки тому +1

    The vacheron and that last breguet 😍. Great video topic and content

  • @douglasmstewart
    @douglasmstewart 2 місяці тому

    Just revisiting this video after 4 years and I wish could still get a Breguet Marine or Overseas for under $10k. I should’ve bought both back then

  • @hans.lankamp
    @hans.lankamp 4 роки тому +7

    You might be able to squeeze into a Lange Saxonia for $10.500!

    • @FedericoTalksWatches
      @FedericoTalksWatches  4 роки тому +4

      Agreed. I tried to stick to steel every day watches though.

    • @hans.lankamp
      @hans.lankamp 4 роки тому +1

      @@FedericoTalksWatches that makes sense, Lange's aren't really everyday watches for most people

  • @Tammacazi10
    @Tammacazi10 4 роки тому

    I understand that there are many nice high end watches that are better value than the submariner, but, it isn't a submariner. The Rolex Sub is just such an iconic piece that looks so much better than any other watch imo. I am biased since I really only like dive watches because they fit my lifestyle the best, but the sub not only looks the best, it performs extremely well. I can't wait to get my hands on one after I graduate college in the next couple years.

  • @chrisbarnhart2032
    @chrisbarnhart2032 4 роки тому +1

    any watch you HAVE to wind and take in for service and feels like a ton of bricks on your wrist AND you have to worry about being mugged for isnt luxury.. maintenence free quartz is actually luxurious.. lol but thats just me

  • @sabaruengineering3843
    @sabaruengineering3843 4 роки тому +1

    Seiko Astron 5X, Omega 15000 Gauss, Citizen Attesa GPS, G-Shock MR.G, Casio Oceanus, Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Rescue-Timer, & Sinn T2 EZM 15

  • @loukasantoniou8054
    @loukasantoniou8054 4 роки тому +1

    blancpain ff chrono is as tough as rolex plus chrono and its about 11 grand, federico how can you not mention piaget with the polo fortyfive gmt flyback chronograph. high end complicated and very wearable at 12mm thick

  • @kaypee1972
    @kaypee1972 4 роки тому +2

    How about presenting 7 dive watches with similar or superior quality / prestige than the Sub for lower price.

    • @tryitout-701
      @tryitout-701 4 роки тому

      kaypee1972 the Pelagos is a no brainer

  • @samiransar387
    @samiransar387 4 роки тому +1

    Everything except the Moser was not visually appealing to ME. No offense people.

  • @lonewolfemcquade8133
    @lonewolfemcquade8133 3 роки тому +1

    Alot of think of the Rolex day date as the trademark Rolex. I actually asked this question and most say the day date. I would say the Submariner if I had to pick

  • @ghettotraveller2027
    @ghettotraveller2027 4 роки тому +2

    JLC Polaris

  • @bikerdude1375
    @bikerdude1375 4 роки тому +3

    There are better, faster and more exclusive cars than Ferrari. However, Ferrari will always be the king of exotic cars. Same rule applies to Rolex. The market will always decide.

    • @FedericoTalksWatches
      @FedericoTalksWatches  4 роки тому +5

      Except Patek is Ferrari and Rolex is much much more mid level

    • @mbnb007
      @mbnb007 4 роки тому

      @@FedericoTalksWatches maybe.. say... a ...Maserati... nice to look at cost quite a bit but nothing to write home about under the hood lol :P

  • @rkillalea6706
    @rkillalea6706 4 роки тому +3

    WAIT! no invicta pro diver Micky mouse edition?

  • @pukenanginang
    @pukenanginang 4 роки тому +16

    What makes Rolex special and hard to get?
    Answer: “US”

    • @rickgreen7393
      @rickgreen7393 3 роки тому

      New in demand models are impossible to get, unless you buy at a mark up in the secondary market ... or get unethical favored status with an unethical AD.

  • @supremegalacticcommander2783
    @supremegalacticcommander2783 4 роки тому +1

    What about the Blancpain Leman Flyback? I had the Type XX, awesome watch and loved that I had a "Breguet". Swapped it out for the, yes, Blancpain Leman Flyback, much cooler movement especially when I put the RGM exhibition back. Great video as always Federico, and I totally agree with your point. ps. the "watch guy snob" in me would much prefer most of the watches you mentioned (especially the one you were wearing!) over a Sub. Forgive me, but I feel like it's the watch the show-off guy get who doesn't really know much about watches. That said, he made a good decision in terms of resale value and over quality!

  • @svenskafamiljenagnetoftrui9739
    @svenskafamiljenagnetoftrui9739 4 роки тому

    Great channel! Thanks for all the great UA-cam videos! If i want to buy a yellow gold rolex, 2017-2019, sub, gmt, daydate or sky dweller, wich one will gane or hold it,s value the most in a 10-15 year period? Thanks

  • @jimlittle5769
    @jimlittle5769 3 роки тому

    The new Seamaster is actually better than the new Sub and over 3K less, and you can actually buy one at an AD. No waiting list, no games, no need to build a relationship with the AD by buying watches you don't need/want so you can get in tight with the AD and move you up a list.

  • @tonygiles1841
    @tonygiles1841 4 роки тому +1

    Great video!
    Although some of the comments below just reinforce my prejudice that for many the Rolex is "about the dosh and not the watch"

    • @mbnb007
      @mbnb007 4 роки тому +1

      would like to know, how many really care about the finishing or movement of a watch vs what the the general public perception of the watch your wearing is... Id say the later would out weigh the former by a very large number... human nature and peacock syndrome... unfortunately we are all pre programmed to large extent on anything we buy, wear etc etc.. is it right .. No, is it a fact ... Yes

  • @norwegianviking2612
    @norwegianviking2612 4 роки тому +2

    One thing you have to watch out when buying some of these watches are the service cost. Even taking some of these to an independent watch maker is going to leave a large mark in your wallet.

    • @FedericoTalksWatches
      @FedericoTalksWatches  4 роки тому +1

      Not that bad actually compared to a sub, most are only marginally more.

    • @norwegianviking2612
      @norwegianviking2612 4 роки тому +1

      @@FedericoTalksWatches Interesting. I imagined a 3135 wouldn't run that high at an independent watch maker compered to the h moser, Roger dubuis or Breguet fly back chronograph you showcased in this video. It's been one of the reasons why I've been holding of on buying anything higher end than a Rolex.

    • @zz.158
      @zz.158 4 роки тому

      @@FedericoTalksWatches how much to service a Moser and VC and Blancpain compared to Rolex Frederico?

  • @markk6214
    @markk6214 4 роки тому +3

    I’ve got a beautiful Breitling Sea Wolf!

  • @alienlife9832
    @alienlife9832 4 роки тому +1

    Great video fed as always and yeah great value watches but waaay more expensive when service time comes around !

  • @TungTran-pp3tx
    @TungTran-pp3tx 3 роки тому

    I hear what you say but for a person who does not have a lot of money I want to spend on a watch brand that is known worldwide and maintained its value which is a Rolex. The other brands you mentioned are known only to the watch enthusiasts but everybody knows Rolex.

  • @arthurjin0722
    @arthurjin0722 4 роки тому +13

    Everybody thinking: make profit with Rolex, and buy these watches “USED”..

  • @targaryenking8877
    @targaryenking8877 3 роки тому

    What's sad is that the DJ 36mm with fluted bezel is more high-end than the Submariner no date. I guess that date function matters ;)

  • @300001111
    @300001111 4 роки тому

    What about Zenith Defy Classic? And, while this isn‘t the topic here, you could especially say the Zenith El Primero 21 is cheaper (it is, by exactly 100 Swiss Francs) and more high end than a Rolex Daytona

  • @Graetzersebastian
    @Graetzersebastian 4 роки тому

    I think that you could do a series of shows about some of the best watch producing countries and regions in the planet. You could do a weekly show on the culture, watch brands, visit tours of the watch company.

  • @menaseven9093
    @menaseven9093 4 роки тому +2

    I like the Vacheron Constantin Overseas and the Breguet Marine.

  • @Diderot68
    @Diderot68 4 роки тому

    1) I prefer a Fifity Fathoms 5015 to the Sub, anytime. Problem is, a Sub has more resale value in the market, so more people will choose the Sub, and then it feeds on itself, and the vicious cycle goes on and on. It will stop when there are too many Subs around. In fact, there is already so many around now that I am starting to feel that the Sub is a boring watch. 2) Agree with Federico on some others, such as Roger Dubuis, Moser & Cie, Breguet etc. The VC has no in house movement? VC Overseas bazels look awful in my eyes. So maybe the VC should not be on this list.

  • @BrettinLux
    @BrettinLux 4 роки тому

    I was in the market for a new watch and was set on buying a Rolex Sub.I spent a month going to the AD but could never hand my credit card over.I travelled on holiday and ended up at a Seiko dealer while waiting for a flight on the airport.Long story short i ended up purchasing a Seiko Grand Seiko diver and an Omega Seamaster Aqua terra. I now look at guys with their Sub on and wonder if they even looked at anything else.

  • @Alejandro.T-k3c
    @Alejandro.T-k3c 4 роки тому +1

    Hey Federico! what about making a video about some alternatives to Rolex GMT II, something between the 5k to 10k range

    • @tryitout-701
      @tryitout-701 4 роки тому +1

      Alejandro Torres Tudor gmt. It looks better Than the new Rolex

  • @barryisland3349
    @barryisland3349 4 роки тому +25

    Rolex has become nothing about Horology anymore.. its become a commodity every piece you have mentioned is better made a better movement and better quality than any Submariner...Even the 16600 is better piece than the Submariner..but the Herd want a Sub just because....

    • @Fjallrav4
      @Fjallrav4 4 роки тому

      Barry island agree that the 16600 is a better choice and for $8000 you can get a mint one.

  • @denisdaly1708
    @denisdaly1708 3 роки тому

    My other subscriptions are for under 500 and 1k watches. I learn about high end horology on this channel. Keep them coming.

  • @richardbaptist5080
    @richardbaptist5080 4 роки тому

    Roger Dubuis Easy diver chronograph with the lemania hand wound movement with geneva seal finishing (same movement as in some phillipe patek models), that's the one to get. Love that GO, that bracelet is killer! Also see through case back. Can I really get a Blancpain fifty fathoms for less than 10k? Great video Fed, great choices, great advice.

  • @Thesupermanning
    @Thesupermanning 4 роки тому +1

    Just goes to show the power of marketing. Rolex wins that game for mechanical timepieces. It would be tough to dethrone the crown now that mechanical watches are a thing of the past for most people. If we take a broader perspective, Apple is actually winning the watch game these days.

  • @UGA.D
    @UGA.D 4 роки тому +1

    Best video in a while... which is saying something, because all your videos are great. Thanks!

  • @thetravelingnomad6203
    @thetravelingnomad6203 4 роки тому

    As a Swedish novice collector in love with blue Seamaster chronos, without the reach to the US or Japanese markets, I wonder If pre-owned Ulysse Nardin maxi marine divers (263-33) for around 3500 us dollars in West Europe with box and papers and not older than 7 years are a valid or high end enough contender to be on the list.

  • @leeharding8306
    @leeharding8306 4 роки тому

    The good thing about the Rolex game/bubble thing is if you’re not prepared to play it there’s a whole bunch of much more interesting stuff out there. The new Seamaster is a better watch than the sub too.

  • @TheBithen00
    @TheBithen00 4 роки тому +3

    Good stuff, Rolex is not the end or be all there is!

  • @marktuyet
    @marktuyet 4 роки тому +9

    You forgot Squale . TVG told me to say that . Nice one Federico .

  • @barbz5235
    @barbz5235 4 роки тому +1

    No mention of GS?

  • @nottavictim5
    @nottavictim5 4 роки тому

    When I purchased my VC Overseas (non chrono) these were exactly my thoughts. Did I want the mass produced watch on the wrist of every little freshly bonused banker or did I want a “holy trinity” gorgeous timepiece with a badass black textured dial and Maltese Cross bracelet? I bought the VC and it has since doubled in value.

    • @tikiecue5677
      @tikiecue5677 3 роки тому

      Perhaps Rolex has the easier name to pronoun e hence remember? Lol! If you look at thr BIG THREE, they all have 2 names, and some people will see oh named after the maker, just like my Daniel Wellington and Filippo Loreti collection... :)

  • @brelaxed13
    @brelaxed13 4 роки тому +1

    Fantastic video with great points.

  • @thewolfetones
    @thewolfetones 2 роки тому

    Vacheron Constantin overseas is a beautiful piece but I checked chrono 24 and that's not cheaper than a submariner by a stretch