Відео

GET OU-

​@@WGWPthis is your personal account?

@@ElTurbinayes now GET OU-

Also you ain’t getting unmuted till tomorrow :3

Glad you enjoyed and thanks for watching!

Indeed! Hope you enjoyed and thanks for watching! GSTK!

Your welcome! Thanks for your support! (We have close to a dozen active and former military in our ranks if that's what you were hinting at as well)

Hi Charlie, this is a good point that has been brought to our attention! Our response to the other comments: This was an editing oversight on our part. Historically, the British would have used the imperial system during this time (feet, yards, etc.). The metric system wasn’t adopted in the British Army until the 20th century. In contrast, the modern U.S. military uses the metric system, and several members at this event, including the one who led it, are in the military. This led to the incorrect use of the metric system in a slip. We hope you enjoyed the video otherwise, and thanks for watching!

We agree! Hope you enjoyed and thanks for watching!

Hi there, great question! Yes, ‘squad’ is a historically documented term referring to a group of 6-8 soldiers. It represents the smallest formally designated unit! This is from a period text that describes training outside Boston: “The Regiments to Exersise every fine day; | and to be frequently practised in firing ball, singly, by | squads, and platoons (particularly the young soldiers) in | all directions.” Hope this answers your question! Thanks for watching!

Hi there, this is a good point. British soldiers were taught to “cover themselves with trees, large stones, broken enclosures, *old houses* or any strong feature that presents itself upon the face of a country” -George Townsend, 1772. While we don’t have exact tactics on how they would have maneuvered around a house, British Soldiers were highly intelligent and would not subject themselves to unnecessary danger. This is our interpretation, however there is no way to know exactly how they would have moved in a fluid dynamic environment such as this. Hope you enjoyed and thanks for watching!

Hi there, Great question! First, there was an opposing force-you can briefly see him when we break the treeline, as well as firing from behind cover as we advance toward the barn. Historically, battles were fought with bayonets fixed from start to finish, as soldiers couldn’t afford to waste precious time fixing them in the midst of combat. For the sake of the video, we fixed them at the very beginning of the battle, which is still more accurate than fixing them just before a final assault. Hope this helps clarify, and thanks for watching!

Hi there, this is a good point that has been brought to our attention! Our response to the other comments: This was an editing oversight on our part. Historically, the British would have used the imperial system during this time (feet, yards, etc.). The metric system wasn’t adopted in the British Army until the 20th century. In contrast, the modern U.S. military uses the metric system, and several members at this event, including the one who led it, are in the military. This led to the incorrect use of the metric system in a slip. We hope you enjoyed the video otherwise, and thanks for watching!

Your comment made our morning! Glad you enjoyed and thanks for watching! God Save the King!

Its a reenactment! Indeed with real people but fake bullets. Hope this answered your question and thanks for watching!

most historians say yes but i think they’d be more careful and not just advancing at the enemy

but as shown here, the advancing forces did make space between them and dividing into groups of two

Hi there, contrary to popular belief, it indeed was! While the line battles you are likely envisioning did play a role in larger scale battles. Smaller engagements, skirmishing prior to larger battles and flanking engagements would have looked closer to what you see here! Check out our video on British Light Infantry for more details! Hope you enjoyed and thanks for watching!

Hi Chris, indeed you saw one. The aim of these events is to practice and video authentic tactics. The film is a vehicle we use to make this content more digestible for our viewers. In the future we may focus on making a more realistic film! Glad you otherwise enjoyed and thanks for watching!

Hi there, they are loaded from the front. Most of the reloading was cut out of the video to help with the cadence of the film. Hope you enjoyed and thanks for watching!

@@HM10thFoot Gerade das Nachladen war entscheidend. Mich hätte interessiert, auf wie viel Schuss diese Redcoats mit Brille gekommen wären in der Minute.

Cheers! Glad you enjoyed and thanks for watching! -Your friends south of the border!

Hi William, this is a good point that has been already brought to our attention! Our response to the other comments: This was an editing oversight on our part. Historically, the British would have used the imperial system during this time (feet, yards, etc.). The metric system wasn’t adopted in the British Army until the 20th century. In contrast, the modern U.S. military uses the metric system, and several members at this event, including the one who led it, are in the military. This led to the incorrect use of the metric system in a slip. We hope you enjoyed the video otherwise, and thanks for watching!

Sandwiches and a chocolate ice

Thank to your grand father for allowing us to continue our hobby today! Hope you enjoyed and thanks for watching!

No specific age limit, but depending on size, physical abilities and maturity, generally our youngest members have been musicians or powder monkeys around age 11 or 12. How old are you? And are you interested in joining? Glad you enjoyed and thanks for watching!

@HM10thFoot I am 70 in good physical condition.

Greetings! Glad you enjoyed, hopefully we’ll see some of your content in the future! Thanks for watching and GSTK!

@@HM10thFoot If you guys stop by, for sure! ;)

Don’t worry, there was plenty of reloading, just doesn’t play well into the film studio ;) hope you enjoyed and thanks for watching!

Hi James, I’m so glad you enjoyed the video! Believe it or not, reenactors don’t use fake British accents because we actually don’t know how soldiers sounded back then. The earliest recordings of Victorian English dialect are so different from modern English that some argue it’s actually closer to American dialect. Because of this, we avoid guessing and simply speak in our normal voices. I hope this clears things up, and thanks again for watching!

True indeed! Glad you enjoyed and thanks for watching!

If only ;) Hope you enjoyed and thanks for watching!

We agree ;) hope you enjoyed and thanks for watching!

The GR on the cartridge box on my abdomen stands for George Rex, which means King George

@ Thank you for your reply. I see, so 🧐 you mean they are the Royal Regiment?

​​@@ローゼンリッター連隊-ranmsansame im guessing this is the fancy royal seals of the british monarchy, part of it letters called a cypher

Appreciate the feedback! Keep an eye out for more to come!

👀 👀

Huzzah! Glad you enjoyed and thanks for watching!

Thanks for watching!