Відео

Interesting you're seeing orientalism here as a positive thing. Adopts less forgiving route would typically mean seeing those cultures in a negative light, but, as you say, it seems like revenge and honour are linked in your reading. You can read this novel as colonial propaganda (France was 'exploring' at the time) Count of monte cristo as a superhero. I imagine the slavery issue is because there is power in form as opposed to content (I didnt mind myself) Interesting that it is Christian in that the outsiders though do succeed while those in power are condemned

The 1288 word sentence is also a run on. On my second read thru now.

Thank you for sharing! Our loved ones live on in the stories we keep alive by telling them. Oral tradition is one of the most beautiful and important forms of communication. Keep spreading the word!

You are amazing. Thank you so much. Great analysis.

Hi Eva...I am about to read Absalom by W. Faulkner...as I watch the 1999 Film The Ninth Gate with Johnny Depp.

Rewatching this after a few months and, wow, you really nailed this. Kudos to you, and I hope you grace us with some content this autumn season!

Ok, Campbridge. I am sorry William. Nikephoros.

The key to "Absalom, Absalom !" is to walk along with Quentin, with his broken watch, going to Death in Camb. Mass. Not hard to read if I get the rythm of this Great Poetry and also the "Quantum-like-sence" of Time. (hence the broken watch) I read The Book once a year for the Pleasure since 22. OK, 50 times? Who counts? A Greek friend, Nikephoros

I have a brand partnership opportunity for you, where can I get in touch with you?

it helped a lot..😁😁😁😁😁

Byron is like Dracula on steriods! The Wandering Jew ! ❤❤❤ 😮😮😮! Dr. Doom!

Byron is like Dracula on steriods! The Wandering Jew ! ❤❤❤ 😮😮😮!

George Gordon, Lord Byron ❤❤❤

Great!

Very interesting, thank you!

❤

Brillant! Thank you for this

Love this video. My favorite novel.

Thank you so much for this video! I read Lolita when I was 16 and I believe it will be a completely different experience now that I'm 11 years older.

You asked about favourite fantasy books - my favourites are the late prose romances of William Morris, written in the 1890's. I first read these as an undergraduate, having found Morris'a Collected Works in our university library (this was in the early 1970's, before they started being reprinted in paperback). Although Morris is often described as a precursor of "high fantasy", his tales are not particularly heavy on magic and are perhaps rather closer to what you describe as "low fantasy". Of Morris' prose romances my particular favourites are "The Water of the Wondrous Isles" and "The Well at the World's End" - I've re-read them every few years for the past half-century, and Birdalone and Ursula are at the top of my list of most beloved literary characters. After Morris I read "The Lord of the Rings" and I came to very much enjoy Tolkien's work - over the years I have also re-read TLotR many times - but I have always been disappointed by the paucity of female characters in Tolkien's work. My taste in fantasy has actually led me look back to Mediaeval and Renaissance literature rather than forward into modern fantasy.

Pornography for women.

I am a glass of orange juice and I do not have limbs so I do not know how I am writing this message to you. It is all very strange...

This is a very informative and beautiful video! I am so glad I found this, keep up the good work!

This is neat. I live near Mexico and this reminds me of many Mexicans beliefs and traditions. It's fun to find commonality. You seem nice so I subscribed

An excellent analysis!

It's refreshing to see someone who notices all the ugly stuff that Humbert confesses to outside of what he did to Dolores. I think that the novel is heavily inspired by Crime and Punishment and Humbert is a type of character that considers himself an ubermensch who then is led by the author to the conclusion he's just a monster. My view is that the book isn't about Humbert manipulating the reader, but Humbert manipulating himself to convince himself to not hate himself and that his paedophilia is good and then Nabokov subjecting him to a sequence of events that proves him wrong. Fun fact, this book isn't written to be presented to the jury. It was supposed to be read after he and Dolores and Humbert and also I think that Humbert simply doesn't care how the reader sees him, that's why he constantly gives out information that shows him in worst light, casts doubt at his own thoughts, etc. For example he tells the story of Anabell and then says he isn't sure if he became a paedophile because of the trauma or if he was madly in love with Anabell because she was the "right age". Lots of Humberts statements refer to what he was thinking and how he was explaining things to himself at specific point of time. Humbert has a basic problem of being unable to control his impulses around Dolores - something that he's sharing with the protagonist of the Enchanter. The difference is that it results in Dolores being convinced that they are lovers while in the Enchanter it results in the victim screaming in terror. The part where he says "it was she who seduced me" was basically a joke because he had this great ubermensch plan of exploiting her without her being aware and was actively trying to put her to sleep and have his way with her and then it turned out she's interested in him. It's certain that Humbert went way further than she wanted and also he sucks in bed. Another thing that immediately after the event, he starts blackmailing her. Like he was completely unprepared for dealing with her as a person. Like what's funny about Humbert is that he sucks at what he does. Like he doesn't groom her, doesn't do stuff like telling her that she's exceptional, that she's mature for her age and other stuff that creeps do. He just has his special plan and also no self-control. The basic problem with the great manipulator theory is that he's really basic at his doing - he's mainly just lying but if he would really be that great manipulator the story would end with Dolores being in love with Humbert and being suddenly surprised that she aged out. One thing I wonder is if Humbert snapped after Anabell died - like he describes having almost spiritual connection to her and then he describes becoming cold after she died. I wonder if his narcissism and sociopathy and inability to connect are a result of trauma. Then there's another weird part where he claims that he has no problem having sex with adult women, he just finds girl-children in specific age range to have a special appeal. That suggests that he's not a real paedophile but rather a fetishist, which sort of makes the whole thing even worse.

Because it's told from the perspective of a self-justifying pedophilic MONSTER?

I got sick of reading his endless ramblings

Its not hard. Its a masterpiece

I've always given this novel a wide berth. After watching your video, I feel that as uncomfortable a read i know it'll be, I should give this a go. After all, I'm basing my thoughts on the complaints and those who hated the book but never read it!! One day, maybe I'll get to it!! Thank you for a great video, and it's lovely to see you again!!xx

Humbert outright demonizes his victims.

And now I want to re-read it 😊

We should consider HH a criminal in court, and this book a plea to us the Jury. If majority of readers manage to fall for it and consider it a love story or justify HH, then we have failed as a society, we’ve let HH manipulate our thoughts. And looking at how Lolita is viewed in general, I think we got there a long time back. 😞

Leí el libro a finales de mis 20's o inicios de mis 30's; hace una década, aproximadamente. Me has hecho reflexionar críticamente sobre el mismo y sobre mí. Gracias.

Happy belated Independence Day mrs Eva . Iam Arabic lady subscriber to British and American UA-cam channels. I sent comments to you from long times . Thank you for your wonderful cultural channel.

I kinda recently found this Channel and subscribed a while ago after watching your video about Gothic. There are some books and a couple movies I simply wont read/watch, because I already feel very much apalled by the premise alone. Lolita feels wrong in a lot of ways. Back when I watched parts of Cronenberg's The Fly, I constantly felt uneasy for several weeks. The same happened after certain scenes of The Thing. Those are very much body gore, but they touched on a nerve that makes my mind feel like cracking. The same feeling comes up thinking about the story in Lolita. But I always enjoy good analysis, so this video was interesting at the least. May I suggest a book for future videos? Bloodmeridian; I currently read through it, as it was suggested to me as a very unique book. It is very much different from what I am used to read - not because of the display of violence, but because the style is so... pale. It doesnt use any of the "classic" writing templates to describe stuff or let characters interact with each other.

welcome back :)

In my view, Pale Fire presents a greater challenge for readers compared to Lolita due to its format as a lengthy poem. While Lolita depicts a disturbing narrative centered around a deceitful man, Nabokov's eloquent writing is beautifully displayed. It's not surprising that some may struggle with the morals of Humbert.

its hard to read because as our resident genius jk rowling tweeted its a heartbreaking love story...

After multiple attempts throughout the years, I finally listened to an audiobook of Lolita read by Jeremy Irons who also plays the main character in the movie. It was actually amazing. He brought so much personality to the character that by the end, I was conflicted about my feelings about him (as intended by the author).

Yes! Humbert is grooming us, the reader, as he groomed Lolita. He is a predatory narcissist. And he succeeds. And suddenly, upon finishing the novel, we are unnerved, because to some degree, upon first reading, we are taken in by him. Really, Lolita is an infinite novel, one of the true infinite novels

unfortunately humbert humbert is very boring so i could never get into the book fully

This was a great literary analysis! I’ve never read Lolita myself as I had been apprehensive toward it, though I’ve heard others’ analyses before and found them interesting. Your video has finally convinced me that I need to read the book for myself. I am a psychology student so the psychological nature of the book is very intriguing to me in particular. You’ve brought up some interesting points in this video, I can’t wait to explore them further in my own reading. Your way of speaking is very nice to listen to, I really enjoyed your video!

Brilliant analysis, thank you.

I found Ada to be very difficult to read. Lolita I found thrilling and enlivening to read. Its set my mind aflame. And that is what makes it the most unnerving novel I have ever read. Martin Amis said something along these lines, that many novels through history were controversial because they challenged the conventions of the time, which needed to be challenged. However, Lolita is a novel about something that can never be redeemed, being about the grooming, kidnapping and rape of a child. It took me more than one reading to notice the moments of suffering of Lolita. Humbert is a pederast and a narcissist. He erases Lolita totally. He writes with the aesthetic beauty of a genius and angel, yet he writes to erase the actions of a devil and a rapist. The morality of Lolita is located here. And yet it is unnerving. It seduces us aesthetically. It involves us in the thrill of Humbert's voice, which is witty, rapturous, infinitely full of life and aesthetic transcendence and brilliant. And yet we are unnervingly seduced into this narcissist erasure of innocence and suffering. The misery of Lolita is erased by the narcissist rapist, who 'loses' to another pederast rapist who Lolita escapes with. And finally, her death in childbirth. It is a tragedy, that is glimpsed only when we see beyond the aesthetic justification of it all by Humbert. In a wider sense, I try and think of what emotional landscape led to this poise. Nabokov witnessed atrocity covered up and justified by apologists for the Bolsheviks who sent his family into exile. This is just speculation. We can never know what hinterland within the subconscious gives birth to genius. But Lolita is unnerving in a way no other novel is.

Great analysis, but how does Clare Quilty fit into this? While he‘s also a pedophile, he exploits Lolita for profit, making her perform in porn movies and taking her to orgies, only to throw her out when she refuses to continue. Why does Nabokov include both characters, and which of the two is more disturbing?

Welcome back! Enjoyed your video and analysis… Look forward to your next video (sooner or later). All the best…

I'm so sorry to hear dystopian fiction is a trigger to you. Dystopian fiction is 1 of my favorite sub-genres. It makes me think; do North Korean refugees find 1984 triggering?

Your videos are great👏